Upload folder using huggingface_hub
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
@@ -50,7 +50,6 @@ Model is deployed on huggingface space for inference
|
|
50 |
|
51 |
# Model Comparison
|
52 |
We have compared our model with the following models
|
53 |
-
- Solidity LLM 2B
|
54 |
- GPT 4.5 Preview
|
55 |
- GPT 4o mini
|
56 |
- Gwen 2.5-Coder-7B
|
@@ -66,10 +65,13 @@ On the following parameters
|
|
66 |
## Benchmark
|
67 |
Below is a figure summarizing the performance of each model across the four evaluation metrics.
|
68 |

|
69 |
-
|
70 |
-
|
71 |
-
-
|
72 |
-
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73 |
|
74 |
|
75 |
# Uses
|
|
|
50 |
|
51 |
# Model Comparison
|
52 |
We have compared our model with the following models
|
|
|
53 |
- GPT 4.5 Preview
|
54 |
- GPT 4o mini
|
55 |
- Gwen 2.5-Coder-7B
|
|
|
65 |
## Benchmark
|
66 |
Below is a figure summarizing the performance of each model across the four evaluation metrics.
|
67 |

|
68 |
+
|
69 |
+
Following obvservation were made regarding Solidity LLM.
|
70 |
+
- Highest Compilation Success Rate (~83%), demonstrating strong Solidity syntax and structure generation.
|
71 |
+
- Good OpenZeppelin Compliance (~65%), indicating frequent use of standard libraries and contract patterns.
|
72 |
+
- Top Gas Efficiency (~72%), producing optimized code as evaluated by tools like Slither.
|
73 |
+
- Moderate Security Score (~58%), showing acceptable security posture but room for improvement.
|
74 |
+
- Concise Code (~70% LOC score), generating relatively compact and efficient smart contracts.
|
75 |
|
76 |
|
77 |
# Uses
|