Answers.Body: <p>I could imagine that this design was chosen to take care of slight angular missalignment of the tracks at the peak of the bridge (the two parts are not exactly in a straight line but slightly bent at the joint). I cannot confirm whether this is possible, because I don't own these parts, but I think for easy assembly and disassembly they have to have a little bit of wiggle room.</p>
  
  <p>The problem in this situation could arise when the train passes the joint, the tracks are not in a straight line, the gear rack reaches directly up until the end of the two tracks on both sides and the solid axle in the train forces the two gear parts on both wheels to be aligned to each other, but the gear rack on the tracks would shift, forcing one side to raise up, putting the wheel teeth on top of the gear rack teeth.</p>
  
  <p>This is only a good guess, but I could imagine in combination with a heavy train this could lead to the train not moving any further because the wheels are again and again slipping out of the gear rack.</p>
  
  <p>The chosen design prevents this because the teeth only need to grab on one side while the other side has a some time to align to the "new direction" again.</p>
  
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-05-17T20:51:23.913Z
Answers.Text: Hi Tobias, this makes perfect sense! Welcome to Bricks.SE.
Answers.UserDisplayName: Metalbeard
Answers.ContentLicense: CC BY-SA 4.0
Answers.CreationDate: 2019-05-17T06:32:37.380Z
Answers.LastActivityDate: 2019-05-17T06:32:37.380Z
Answers.UserDisplayName: Tobias Schulte
Body: <p>DUPLO bridge elements include racks to allow the powered trains to be able to make the climb. An example of this is element <a href="https://brickset.com/parts/6232170/duplo-bridge-upper-part" rel="noreferrer">35138</a>:</p>
  
  <p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/dYARV.png" rel="noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/dYARV.png" alt="DUPLO train bridge upper (35138)"></a></p>
  
  <p>I noticed that the gear rack on this element is not continuous at the peak of the bridge. Here's what the rack looks like at that point:</p>
  
  <p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/eDFrc.jpg" rel="noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/eDFrc.jpg" alt="gear rack photo"></a></p>
  
  <p>It seems to me that a continuous gear rack would be the obvious design choice. What is gained by including this gap?</p>
  
Tags: <trains><duplo>
Title: What is the purpose of the discontinuity in the DUPLO train bridge rack?
UserDisplayName: jncraton
ThreadText: # What is the purpose of the discontinuity in the DUPLO train bridge rack?
  
  (Asked by: username_0 on 2019-05-13)
  
  DUPLO bridge elements include racks to allow the powered trains to be able to make the climb. An example of this is element [35138](https://brickset.com/parts/6232170/duplo-bridge-upper-part):
  
  [![DUPLO train bridge upper (35138)](https://i.sstatic.net/dYARV.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/dYARV.png)
  
  I noticed that the gear rack on this element is not continuous at the peak of the bridge. Here's what the rack looks like at that point:
  
  [![gear rack photo](https://i.sstatic.net/eDFrc.jpg)](https://i.sstatic.net/eDFrc.jpg)
  
  It seems to me that a continuous gear rack would be the obvious design choice. What is gained by including this gap?
  
  **Tags:** trains, duplo
  
  ---
  
  ## 1 answers
  
  ### Answer by username_1 on 2019-05-17. Score: 7 | Accepted answer
  
  I could imagine that this design was chosen to take care of slight angular missalignment of the tracks at the peak of the bridge (the two parts are not exactly in a straight line but slightly bent at the joint). I cannot confirm whether this is possible, because I don't own these parts, but I think for easy assembly and disassembly they have to have a little bit of wiggle room.
  
  The problem in this situation could arise when the train passes the joint, the tracks are not in a straight line, the gear rack reaches directly up until the end of the two tracks on both sides and the solid axle in the train forces the two gear parts on both wheels to be aligned to each other, but the gear rack on the tracks would shift, forcing one side to raise up, putting the wheel teeth on top of the gear rack teeth.
  
  This is only a good guess, but I could imagine in combination with a heavy train this could lead to the train not moving any further because the wheels are again and again slipping out of the gear rack.
  
  The chosen design prevents this because the teeth only need to grab on one side while the other side has a some time to align to the "new direction" again.
  
  > **Comments:**
  > **username_2**: Hi Tobias, this makes perfect sense! Welcome to Bricks.SE.  
  
  ---
  
  