<p>I think it's safe to say that there's at least one model of 3D printer that works in microgravity -- since <a href="https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/research/news/3d-printing-in-space-long-duration-spaceflight-applications" rel="nofollow noreferrer">one was sent to the International Space Station a few months ago</a>.  I presume the one there is an FDM type, as those need not be dependent on gravity; my Ender 3, for instance, has positive drive both ways on all three axes, so as long as the filament source is kept captive, the printer ought to work the same as it would on Earth.</p>
<p>Beyond that, there is the Quinly setup, in which a common FDM printer like the Ender 3 is set up at about a 45 degree angle, using a polymer coated glass bed, to allow network printing part after part (the printer pushes the parts off the cooled bed with the X gantry and hot end housing before preheating for the next print).  Similar methods are used to print at a significant angle on a flat build surface for conveyor bed printers that can both print very long parts, and print sequences of parts one after the other (the belt carries the parts to the turn-around, then the flex pops them off).</p>
<p>The operation of common FDM printers depends on mechanical grip of the filament, screw or toothed belt drive of the axes, and adhesion of the first layer to the build surface and of subsequent layers to those already laid down --- this ought to work even upside down, against gravity, at least until the weight of the part starts to compete with its adhesion strength.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-06-03T16:55:00.687Z
would you link to the NASA/ESA/JAXA article on that project?
Trish
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-06-01T16:02:46.900Z
2021-06-03T16:57:05.483Z
2021-06-03T16:57:05.483Z
Zeiss Ikon
<p>Yes!</p>
<p>3D Printing upside would only potentially have an issue with the first layer if you're using an extremely large gap on the first layer, however in normal circumstances there's enough pressure that the filament is squished into the bed, if you've got one yourself you can put it on it's side, the question when it comes to 3D Printing <em>isn't</em> upside down, but not the correct way, as it's presuming that gravity pushing down is the important thing, while in every other orientation it also works.</p>
<p>In theory SLA printing would work just fine, as long as you're able to seal the build plate and vat together so no resin leaks out.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-12-30T13:16:34.773Z
I think I remember that Adrian Bowyer did test with upside down printing and found that gravity is less important than we might think. Also MadeInSpace created a 3d printer that is now operational on the ISS. So zero gravity is also covered. Maybe add these to your answer? I wounder about bridging though,...
Lars Pötter
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-05-29T19:58:52.387Z
@LarsPötter: Bridging should only do better.
R.. GitHub STOP HELPING ICE
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-12-29T03:30:32.420Z
2020-12-29T03:30:32.420Z
Barrel
<p>Barrel's answer is absolutely correct, <em>provided the printer doesn't have gratuitous dependencies on gravity</em>. For example, a lot of high-end CoreXY designs I've seen, with 3 Z motors for automatic true leveling, rely on gravity to move/hold the bed in the -Z direction and only drive the +Z direction. This is often done for the purpose of decoupling from error in lead screws/ball screws, as in the <a href="https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:4387638" rel="nofollow noreferrer">HevORT ZR V2</a>. Such machines can't print in alternate orientations or zero/low gravity. However, they can be adapted to drive the Z in both directions.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-05-29T18:00:30.833Z
2021-05-29T18:00:30.833Z
R.. GitHub STOP HELPING ICE
<p>Lulzbot used to do this at trade shows -- printers on their side, printing all day long.</p>
<p>So long as it sticks to the bed, and sticks to the subsequent layers of the part, it works.</p>
<p>The determining factor is gravity -- if the part being printed has overhangs or unsupported areas, the extruded material would fall back at the extruder, instead of down onto the part. You may get around this with dual extrusion supports, but if there's any layer separation, it would probably fail quickly, lol.</p>
<p>Zero gravity? Easier than upside down with gravity, I'd think!</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-05-29T22:21:04.573Z
Welcome to 3D Printing SE and thank you for your contribution. When you get a chance, please take the [tour] to understand how the site works and how it is different than others.
agarza
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-05-29T22:02:26.887Z
2021-05-29T22:02:26.887Z
Rob Lent
<p>SLA printing wouldn't just work on earth, it just needs some sort of gravitational pull just to keep the liquid down. On the other hand, &quot;normal&quot; 3D printing in theory could print upside down, sideways or in 0 gravity because the process that takes to print is it squishes melted filament down onto other filament that has been melted and cooled or the print bed, the only constraint with doing that is making sure that making sure that the print doesn't slip or fall</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-05-31T18:43:47.437Z
2021-05-31T18:43:47.437Z
alexjshepler
<p>I assume SLA printing only works on Earth and upright.</p>
<p>But would fused-filament printer (e.g. Prusa Mk3) work in zero gravity? What about upside down or sideways? If not, could it be modified to work in other orientations? Have there been any demonstrations of it?</p>

<print-quality><extrusion><fdm>
Will 3D printing work upside down or in zero gravity?
BetterSense
# Will 3D printing work upside down or in zero gravity?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2020-12-29)

I assume SLA printing only works on Earth and upright.

But would fused-filament printer (e.g. Prusa Mk3) work in zero gravity? What about upside down or sideways? If not, could it be modified to work in other orientations? Have there been any demonstrations of it?

**Tags:** print-quality, extrusion, fdm

---

## 5 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2021-06-01. Score: 3

I think it's safe to say that there's at least one model of 3D printer that works in microgravity -- since [one was sent to the International Space Station a few months ago](https://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/station/research/news/3d-printing-in-space-long-duration-spaceflight-applications). I presume the one there is an FDM type, as those need not be dependent on gravity; my Ender 3, for instance, has positive drive both ways on all three axes, so as long as the filament source is kept captive, the printer ought to work the same as it would on Earth.

Beyond that, there is the Quinly setup, in which a common FDM printer like the Ender 3 is set up at about a 45 degree angle, using a polymer coated glass bed, to allow network printing part after part (the printer pushes the parts off the cooled bed with the X gantry and hot end housing before preheating for the next print). Similar methods are used to print at a significant angle on a flat build surface for conveyor bed printers that can both print very long parts, and print sequences of parts one after the other (the belt carries the parts to the turn-around, then the flex pops them off).

The operation of common FDM printers depends on mechanical grip of the filament, screw or toothed belt drive of the axes, and adhesion of the first layer to the build surface and of subsequent layers to those already laid down --- this ought to work even upside down, against gravity, at least until the weight of the part starts to compete with its adhesion strength.

> **Comments:**
> **username_2**: would you link to the NASA/ESA/JAXA article on that project?  

---

### Answer by username_3 on 2020-12-29. Score: 2

Yes!

3D Printing upside would only potentially have an issue with the first layer if you're using an extremely large gap on the first layer, however in normal circumstances there's enough pressure that the filament is squished into the bed, if you've got one yourself you can put it on it's side, the question when it comes to 3D Printing *isn't* upside down, but not the correct way, as it's presuming that gravity pushing down is the important thing, while in every other orientation it also works.

In theory SLA printing would work just fine, as long as you're able to seal the build plate and vat together so no resin leaks out.

> **Comments:**
> **username_4**: I think I remember that Adrian Bowyer did test with upside down printing and found that gravity is less important than we might think. Also MadeInSpace created a 3d printer that is now operational on the ISS. So zero gravity is also covered. Maybe add these to your answer? I wounder about bridging though,...  
> **username_5**: @LarsPötter: Bridging should only do better.  

---

### Answer by username_5 on 2021-05-29. Score: 2

Barrel's answer is absolutely correct, *provided the printer doesn't have gratuitous dependencies on gravity*. For example, a lot of high-end CoreXY designs I've seen, with 3 Z motors for automatic true leveling, rely on gravity to move/hold the bed in the -Z direction and only drive the +Z direction. This is often done for the purpose of decoupling from error in lead screws/ball screws, as in the [HevORT ZR V2](https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:4387638). Such machines can't print in alternate orientations or zero/low gravity. However, they can be adapted to drive the Z in both directions.


---

### Answer by username_6 on 2021-05-29. Score: 0

Lulzbot used to do this at trade shows -- printers on their side, printing all day long.

So long as it sticks to the bed, and sticks to the subsequent layers of the part, it works.

The determining factor is gravity -- if the part being printed has overhangs or unsupported areas, the extruded material would fall back at the extruder, instead of down onto the part. You may get around this with dual extrusion supports, but if there's any layer separation, it would probably fail quickly, lol.

Zero gravity? Easier than upside down with gravity, I'd think!

> **Comments:**
> **username_7**: Welcome to 3D Printing SE and thank you for your contribution. When you get a chance, please take the [tour] to understand how the site works and how it is different than others.  

---

### Answer by username_8 on 2021-05-31. Score: 0

SLA printing wouldn't just work on earth, it just needs some sort of gravitational pull just to keep the liquid down. On the other hand, "normal" 3D printing in theory could print upside down, sideways or in 0 gravity because the process that takes to print is it squishes melted filament down onto other filament that has been melted and cooled or the print bed, the only constraint with doing that is making sure that making sure that the print doesn't slip or fall


---

