<p>I would say it's not the best approach. </p>

<p>In the situation you've described I would rather install some kind of vertical ring a bit above your printer. This ring would organize your filament going from any direction. </p>

<p>So let's assume you got one spool on the right and one on the left of your printer, both are 1m away from the printer itself. If you get filament and put throught the ring then to your extruder.</p>

<p>In my opinion the ring should be around 15..20cm over the printer, it should have around 10..15cm diameter and spools should not be too low.</p>

<p>The only issue I see is unwinding spools which are too far from the printer because then filament would be unwinded angular but the same issue would be with and without teflon tube.</p>

<p><strong>[edit]</strong>
Here is a simple change of your design</p>

<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/slvWkm.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/slvWkm.png" alt="enter image description here"></a></p>

<p><strong>[edit2]</strong>
Please also note that you can assure proper angle of unwinding filament by installing small rings ("eyes") next to spools. These eyes will direct filament out of spool and then filament will turn to your big ring mounted on the printer. This is common solution in textile industry</p>

<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/RQjybm.jpg" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/RQjybm.jpg" alt="enter image description here"></a></p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-06-13T11:54:43.260Z
Thanx Tormod. Acording to my experience - tube longer than 1m is not a good idea. #1 it's harder to pull/push filament. #2 such long/heavy tube has influence on movement of the caret. #3 it's uncomfortable to install/uninstall filament
darth pixel
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-06-13T12:12:29.933Z
I absolutely agree, Darth! :-)
Tormod Haugene
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-06-13T18:22:04.637Z
I'm not sure I understand your proposed setup with the ring. Would it be too much trouble to ask for a quick mockup image (like the one I added to the question)?
mhelvens
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-06-13T18:30:22.443Z
And the issue of pulling filament at an angle (and expecting the spool to keep up) is the reason I'm suggesting tubes. If the filament angle is properly guided at the source, I don't see that as a problem. Thoughts?
mhelvens
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-06-14T04:55:11.160Z
@mhelvens please take a look on my post (edit). Please also note that rings can be used on both sides of the design (Thanx Tormod). You can apply little "eye" next to the spool which will assure the filament is unwinded at proper angle, then there could be a loooong way to the ring proposed by me :) (of course on that way there could be even more rings which will direct filament properly)... assuming you are pulling, which you do
darth pixel
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-06-13T08:24:48.347Z
2016-06-14T06:27:23.920Z
2016-06-14T06:27:23.920Z
darth pixel
<p>This is somewhat similar to a question I asked a while back. Pay attention to Ryan Carlyle's response in <a href="https://3dprinting.stackexchange.com/questions/768/filament-guides-drag">the question I posted</a>. His post essentially explains various ways that guide tubes may hinder extrusion due to drag. In regards to the length of your guide tubes, ensure that the tube is relatively straight.</p>

<p>If you are holding the filament above the machine, chances are that you wont really need the tubes anyways and the distance between the spool and the extruder won't matter either. The point of tube is to ensure the filament doesn't bind coming from the back of the machine, thus potentially clogging your extruder.</p>

<p><strong>Update</strong>
Based on the OP's drawing, I think it would benefit to change the design to drop the tubes all together. The tubes can provide many point of contact and managing so many lines at once may become problematic. So, possibly drop the tubes and intend on not drawing your filament unless they are fed into the extruder. You could install smaller ends of tubes at either end of assembly (one at the storage rack, the other above the extruder) to ensure the filament is being fed/pulled straight. The space between the storage rack and the machine doesn't matter. Here's a basic edit of your design that might be easier to manage. For kicks, here's <a href="http://www.thingiverse.com/thing:993473" rel="nofollow noreferrer">a design I made</a> for my own machine as a "quick-change" design.</p>

<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/NQXGg.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/NQXGg.png" alt="enter image description here"></a></p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-06-13T18:27:04.177Z
Even if the spools hang above the printer (which is the plan), I feel like things might go wrong if the extruder tries to pull filament from the spool at an awkward angle. Anyway, the answer you're referring to is useful. Thanks!
mhelvens
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-06-13T19:44:19.373Z
Thank you for uploading your sketch, it helped understand more of what you're trying to achieve! +1
tbm0115
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-06-13T14:19:41.750Z
2016-06-13T19:43:45.217Z
2017-04-13T13:00:58.447Z
tbm0115
<p>I would like to add to the already great discussion, that this general approach is prone to filament degradation by water intake. That is, if you are using filament for which this is an issue (PLA as the most prominent example).</p>

<p>Also, your goal is to exchange more quickly, that is without (un-)mounting whole spools each time. Basically you want to have a multi-filament spool holder, if I understand correctly. If you design an enclosed box with a single outlet you could incorporate silica gel inside and a reduced effort to swap the filament. I would still avoid a nice free-hanging spool solution due to the degradation issue.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-06-14T20:26:40.357Z
A good point! An enclosed box would definitely be a good move. This also seems to be an argument in favor of tubes all the way, rather than short filament guides on both ends. --- I don't understand your "box with a single outlet" plan, though. I don't see the point, and it would probably complicate filament swapping, because I'd have to open up the spool enclosure to feed a new strand through the tube. Right now I'm still inclined to run a bunch of separate tubes to slightly above the extruder, like in my mockup image.
mhelvens
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-06-15T12:54:38.307Z
Yes, if you can get the tubes somewhat airtight or don't use the first part of the filament each time you swap, your idea works better. Why wouldn't you want the whole box very close to the printer so that you wouldn't need the individual tubes altogether? Having 5 tubes being moved by the carriage is additional load to the motor that doesn't benefit the print itself.
kamuro
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-06-15T13:29:00.460Z
The placement of the spools is purely a matter of constraints in the printer-room. It turns out the spools would have to be at a distance of about 50cm. --- Moreover, as J. Roibal has suggested in a comment, it may be fun to try to fully automate filament swapping some day. I'd definitely need individual tubes for that. Would multiple tubes really add significantly to the load? I'll have to experiment.
mhelvens
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-06-15T16:24:40.307Z
The load may depend on how the tubes are directed to the printer. I had a problem when building a repstrap, - as soon as the bowden tube was attached, the motor wouldn't move anymore. Truth be told, it was a tiny cd laser carriage drive motor, but but it moved flawlessly without the tube. You can easily find out how much you have to increase the current at the border to losing steps. I would guess that it doesn't influence your printer too much (watch ghosting), but if it can be easily avoided, why shouldn't one think about it when designing ;) Fully automated sounds like real fun ;)
kamuro
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-06-14T11:56:42.953Z
2016-12-06T21:25:10.133Z
2016-12-06T21:25:10.133Z
kamuro
<p>Yes, this is feasible. You should constrain the tube at both ends, this prevents the spool from pulling up on the extruder. This approach is known as <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bl_JPJAhuEo" rel="nofollow">reverse bowden</a> setup.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-06-13T18:23:41.550Z
What do you mean by 'constrain the tube at both ends'? Are you simply suggesting that neither end should hang loose? Please have a quick look at the image I added to the question, to see if it matches your meaning.
mhelvens
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-06-14T14:05:25.473Z
Yes, this matches what I mean. Without the tube, the force required to get the spools to unwind is transferred to the extruder (possibly moving it around and decreasing print quality). With the tube in place, that force is instead applied to the mount of the tube.
Tom van der Zanden
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-06-13T10:46:33.743Z
2016-06-13T10:46:33.743Z
Tom van der Zanden
<p>This shouldn't be too much of an issue, as long as:</p>

<ol>
<li>You guide the filament properly to avoid breakage (at both ends as Tom mentions)</li>
<li>You avoid too much friction between the pulling extruder motor and the spool itself.</li>
</ol>

<p>You mention that you consider using a 1-2 meter teflon tube to guide the filament. Although this <em>might</em> work, long teflon tubes will increase the friction from pulling the filament. Furthermore, I really doubt having such a long tube will be beneficial at all; quite on the contrary, I think it could be rather impractical. Most likely, having simple guides at both ends (whether its tube stubs or rings) will suffice.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-06-13T18:28:52.467Z
Aha. Guides at both ends, rather than a tube all the way. I can see the sense in that. Now that I think about it, other answers (like darth pixel's) may also have hinted at this.
mhelvens
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-06-13T19:51:41.727Z
@mhelvens, I believe that both Tom and Darth hinted at this. Whether it's a tube or rings probably doesn't really matter that much. :-)
Tormod Haugene
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-06-15T10:32:50.593Z
@TormodHaugene Actually, tube v.s. rings makes a difference. A tube has the advantage I mentioned in my answer, rings don't.
Tom van der Zanden
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-06-13T11:11:14.450Z
2016-06-13T11:11:14.450Z
Tormod Haugene
<p>Your idea is actually good, but i would add some edits to it. First of all, to keep your equipment clean, you would like to add little foam rubbers to clean the filament at the entrance of the tubes, to clean out the dust that will be accumulating over the rolls.</p>

<p>Another thing that i would recommend is to hang the tubes on a separate support for them and not on the extruder head, as it would add some additional friction to it and can cause the 3d model with additional friction making it distorted.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-06-13T22:48:32.400Z
Can you discuss your improvements further? I am interested in the maintenance portion of your answer, in particular.
J. Roibal - BlockchainEng
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-06-14T20:22:02.280Z
@DanBoyko: I'd be interested to see you finish that last sentence. :-)
mhelvens
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-07-02T00:01:23.487Z
i am really sorry, don't know why it cut the answer, i was about to say that i would damage the 3d model with additional friction making it distorted
Dan Boyko
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-06-13T22:33:41.380Z
2016-12-06T16:38:33.737Z
2016-12-06T16:38:33.737Z
Dan Boyko
<p>I'm setting up my printer in a small room, and I thought I'd come up with a system for more easily swapping filaments, but I'm not yet sure it is feasible.</p>

<p>Rather than physically replace the spool, I'd like to hang most of my spools on the wall, where they can rotate, and only swap filament leads in the (direct drive) extruder. The spools would be placed at some distance from the extruder, and at various angles. So to make sure the filament is pulled from the spool at the proper angle, and to avoid breaking it, I think it should probably run through a <a href="http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B01CVKM62Q" rel="noreferrer">flexible tube</a> to reach the printer.</p>

<p>I know such tubes are used for Bowden style extruders, but what I'm proposing is different in at least two ways: <strong>[1]</strong> the extruder motor would be <em>pulling</em> (not <em>pushing</em>) filament through the tube and <strong>[2]</strong> the tube would be longer than normal, e.g., between 1 and 2 meters.</p>

<p>Is this plan feasible? Or are the problems I am not foreseeing?</p>

<hr>

<p><strong>Edit 1:</strong> I don't know where I got 1-2 meters from. The distance is actually closer to 50cm.</p>

<p><strong>Edit 2:</strong> To clarify my proposed setup, here's a crude mockup:</p>

<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/nWcuk.png" rel="noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/nWcuk.png" alt="mockup"></a></p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-06-13T21:21:39.960Z
Fantastic approach and I really like the possibilities that this idea creates. My questions: How would the printer know to swap filaments, and which filaments to swap? (potentially written into the G-Code?) How will the printer swap the filament? In answer to the second question, I am envisioning some type of cutter which then melts (fuses) the second filament to the first, but how can this be accomplished in a uniform fashion? Anyways, I think this is a fantastic idea, I'll be watching this thread closely! Contact me if I can help in any way.
J. Roibal - BlockchainEng
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-06-13T21:30:26.447Z
@J.Roibal: Your interpretation is a bit more ambitious than my actual idea. :-) I was still thinking of swapping filaments manually, just minimizing the time and effort required. This would certainly help you to hot-swap filaments during a print, but I currently have no plans to fully automate this. --- I know about [another recent project](http://www.mosaicmanufacturing.com) you may be interested in. But it's a bit more pricey than what I have in mind.
mhelvens
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-06-13T21:32:33.630Z
my heavens, mhelvens! I can totally see how this could become automated, removing the necessity of dual-extruder 3-d printers while adding the capability to print in dozens of colors and types of materials, automatically.
J. Roibal - BlockchainEng
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-06-13T22:16:22.623Z
@J.Roibal: Sure. I can see that too. And I may automate the process in the future. But it would be a hobby project, as this is, and I would not achieve the precision required for multi-color prints. Developing that technology would be a full-time effort, because it is more complicated than you might think. --- Anyway, as I hinted in my previous comment, the technology you want does already exist. Have a look at the [Palette](http://www.mosaicmanufacturing.com). I wish I could afford one.
mhelvens
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-06-13T22:24:45.183Z
@J.Roibal: The Palette splices multiple filaments into a single stream, as you suggest. The problem is that colors mix together in the hot-end. To get crisp color-swaps, they build a 'transition tower' on the side of the main print, to purge the mixed plastic. --- The solution we're talking about here would work differently. For every swap, it would retract the current filament, and start extruding another. This would probably evolve into multiple Bowden extruders feeding the same hot-end, and might not produce as much waste. Sounds like a fun project. But I do have a day job. ;-)
mhelvens
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-06-16T13:32:25.437Z
Interesting idea. Sadly you are overthinking it.

At the hackerspace we have plenty of setups like this, but we do not bother with tubes. Just hang it and go :-)
MakerModder
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-06-17T10:53:46.463Z
@StarWind: Could you link me to some examples, perhaps? With pictures / descriptions?
mhelvens
CC BY-SA 3.0
2016-06-17T11:37:17.633Z
Yeah so it is the guys who make the Flexon extruder.. here is their site with photos 
http://diabasepe.com/
MakerModder
<filament><extruder><motor>
Pulling filament through long tubes
mhelvens
# Pulling filament through long tubes

(Asked by: username_0 on 2016-06-13)

I'm setting up my printer in a small room, and I thought I'd come up with a system for more easily swapping filaments, but I'm not yet sure it is feasible.

Rather than physically replace the spool, I'd like to hang most of my spools on the wall, where they can rotate, and only swap filament leads in the (direct drive) extruder. The spools would be placed at some distance from the extruder, and at various angles. So to make sure the filament is pulled from the spool at the proper angle, and to avoid breaking it, I think it should probably run through a [flexible tube](http://www.amazon.co.uk/dp/B01CVKM62Q) to reach the printer.

I know such tubes are used for Bowden style extruders, but what I'm proposing is different in at least two ways: **[1]** the extruder motor would be *pulling* (not *pushing*) filament through the tube and **[2]** the tube would be longer than normal, e.g., between 1 and 2 meters.

Is this plan feasible? Or are the problems I am not foreseeing?

---

**Edit 1:** I don't know where I got 1-2 meters from. The distance is actually closer to 50cm.

**Edit 2:** To clarify my proposed setup, here's a crude mockup:

[![mockup](https://i.sstatic.net/nWcuk.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/nWcuk.png)

**Tags:** filament, extruder, motor
> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: Fantastic approach and I really like the possibilities that this idea creates. My questions: How would the printer know to swap filaments, and which filaments to swap? (potentially written into the G-Code?) How will the printer swap the filament? In answer to the second question, I am envisioning some type of cutter which then melts (fuses) the second filament to the first, but how can this be accomplished in a uniform fashion? Anyways, I think this is a fantastic idea, I'll be watching this thread closely! Contact me if I can help in any way.  
> **username_0**: @J.Roibal: Your interpretation is a bit more ambitious than my actual idea. :-) I was still thinking of swapping filaments manually, just minimizing the time and effort required. This would certainly help you to hot-swap filaments during a print, but I currently have no plans to fully automate this. --- I know about [another recent project](http://www.mosaicmanufacturing.com) you may be interested in. But it's a bit more pricey than what I have in mind.  
> **username_1**: my heavens, mhelvens! I can totally see how this could become automated, removing the necessity of dual-extruder 3-d printers while adding the capability to print in dozens of colors and types of materials, automatically.  
> **username_0**: @J.Roibal: Sure. I can see that too. And I may automate the process in the future. But it would be a hobby project, as this is, and I would not achieve the precision required for multi-color prints. Developing that technology would be a full-time effort, because it is more complicated than you might think. --- Anyway, as I hinted in my previous comment, the technology you want does already exist. Have a look at the [Palette](http://www.mosaicmanufacturing.com). I wish I could afford one.  
> **username_0**: @J.Roibal: The Palette splices multiple filaments into a single stream, as you suggest. The problem is that colors mix together in the hot-end. To get crisp color-swaps, they build a 'transition tower' on the side of the main print, to purge the mixed plastic. --- The solution we're talking about here would work differently. For every swap, it would retract the current filament, and start extruding another. This would probably evolve into multiple Bowden extruders feeding the same hot-end, and might not produce as much waste. Sounds like a fun project. But I do have a day job. ;-)  
> **username_2**: Interesting idea. Sadly you are overthinking it.  At the hackerspace we have plenty of setups like this, but we do not bother with tubes. Just hang it and go :-)  
> **username_0**: @StarWind: Could you link me to some examples, perhaps? With pictures / descriptions?  
> **username_2**: Yeah so it is the guys who make the Flexon extruder.. here is their site with photos  http://diabasepe.com/  

---

## 6 answers

### Answer by username_3 on 2016-06-13. Score: 8

I would say it's not the best approach.

In the situation you've described I would rather install some kind of vertical ring a bit above your printer. This ring would organize your filament going from any direction.

So let's assume you got one spool on the right and one on the left of your printer, both are 1m away from the printer itself. If you get filament and put throught the ring then to your extruder.

In my opinion the ring should be around 15..20cm over the printer, it should have around 10..15cm diameter and spools should not be too low.

The only issue I see is unwinding spools which are too far from the printer because then filament would be unwinded angular but the same issue would be with and without teflon tube.

**[edit]**
Here is a simple change of your design

[![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/slvWkm.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/slvWkm.png)

**[edit2]**
Please also note that you can assure proper angle of unwinding filament by installing small rings ("eyes") next to spools. These eyes will direct filament out of spool and then filament will turn to your big ring mounted on the printer. This is common solution in textile industry

[![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/RQjybm.jpg)](https://i.sstatic.net/RQjybm.jpg)

> **Comments:**
> **username_3**: Thanx Tormod. Acording to my experience - tube longer than 1m is not a good idea. #1 it's harder to pull/push filament. #2 such long/heavy tube has influence on movement of the caret. #3 it's uncomfortable to install/uninstall filament  
> **username_4**: I absolutely agree, Darth! :-)  
> **username_0**: I'm not sure I understand your proposed setup with the ring. Would it be too much trouble to ask for a quick mockup image (like the one I added to the question)?  
> **username_0**: And the issue of pulling filament at an angle (and expecting the spool to keep up) is the reason I'm suggesting tubes. If the filament angle is properly guided at the source, I don't see that as a problem. Thoughts?  
> **username_3**: @mhelvens please take a look on my post (edit). Please also note that rings can be used on both sides of the design (Thanx Tormod). You can apply little "eye" next to the spool which will assure the filament is unwinded at proper angle, then there could be a loooong way to the ring proposed by me :) (of course on that way there could be even more rings which will direct filament properly)... assuming you are pulling, which you do  

---

### Answer by username_5 on 2016-06-13. Score: 5

This is somewhat similar to a question I asked a while back. Pay attention to Ryan Carlyle's response in [the question I posted](https://3dprinting.stackexchange.com/questions/768/filament-guides-drag). His post essentially explains various ways that guide tubes may hinder extrusion due to drag. In regards to the length of your guide tubes, ensure that the tube is relatively straight.

If you are holding the filament above the machine, chances are that you wont really need the tubes anyways and the distance between the spool and the extruder won't matter either. The point of tube is to ensure the filament doesn't bind coming from the back of the machine, thus potentially clogging your extruder.

**Update**
Based on the OP's drawing, I think it would benefit to change the design to drop the tubes all together. The tubes can provide many point of contact and managing so many lines at once may become problematic. So, possibly drop the tubes and intend on not drawing your filament unless they are fed into the extruder. You could install smaller ends of tubes at either end of assembly (one at the storage rack, the other above the extruder) to ensure the filament is being fed/pulled straight. The space between the storage rack and the machine doesn't matter. Here's a basic edit of your design that might be easier to manage. For kicks, here's [a design I made](http://www.thingiverse.com/thing:993473) for my own machine as a "quick-change" design.

[![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/NQXGg.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/NQXGg.png)

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: Even if the spools hang above the printer (which is the plan), I feel like things might go wrong if the extruder tries to pull filament from the spool at an awkward angle. Anyway, the answer you're referring to is useful. Thanks!  
> **username_5**: Thank you for uploading your sketch, it helped understand more of what you're trying to achieve! +1  

---

### Answer by username_6 on 2016-06-14. Score: 4

I would like to add to the already great discussion, that this general approach is prone to filament degradation by water intake. That is, if you are using filament for which this is an issue (PLA as the most prominent example).

Also, your goal is to exchange more quickly, that is without (un-)mounting whole spools each time. Basically you want to have a multi-filament spool holder, if I understand correctly. If you design an enclosed box with a single outlet you could incorporate silica gel inside and a reduced effort to swap the filament. I would still avoid a nice free-hanging spool solution due to the degradation issue.

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: A good point! An enclosed box would definitely be a good move. This also seems to be an argument in favor of tubes all the way, rather than short filament guides on both ends. --- I don't understand your "box with a single outlet" plan, though. I don't see the point, and it would probably complicate filament swapping, because I'd have to open up the spool enclosure to feed a new strand through the tube. Right now I'm still inclined to run a bunch of separate tubes to slightly above the extruder, like in my mockup image.  
> **username_6**: Yes, if you can get the tubes somewhat airtight or don't use the first part of the filament each time you swap, your idea works better. Why wouldn't you want the whole box very close to the printer so that you wouldn't need the individual tubes altogether? Having 5 tubes being moved by the carriage is additional load to the motor that doesn't benefit the print itself.  
> **username_0**: The placement of the spools is purely a matter of constraints in the printer-room. It turns out the spools would have to be at a distance of about 50cm. --- Moreover, as J. Roibal has suggested in a comment, it may be fun to try to fully automate filament swapping some day. I'd definitely need individual tubes for that. Would multiple tubes really add significantly to the load? I'll have to experiment.  
> **username_6**: The load may depend on how the tubes are directed to the printer. I had a problem when building a repstrap, - as soon as the bowden tube was attached, the motor wouldn't move anymore. Truth be told, it was a tiny cd laser carriage drive motor, but but it moved flawlessly without the tube. You can easily find out how much you have to increase the current at the border to losing steps. I would guess that it doesn't influence your printer too much (watch ghosting), but if it can be easily avoided, why shouldn't one think about it when designing ;) Fully automated sounds like real fun ;)  

---

### Answer by username_7 on 2016-06-13. Score: 3

Yes, this is feasible. You should constrain the tube at both ends, this prevents the spool from pulling up on the extruder. This approach is known as [reverse bowden](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bl_JPJAhuEo) setup.

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: What do you mean by 'constrain the tube at both ends'? Are you simply suggesting that neither end should hang loose? Please have a quick look at the image I added to the question, to see if it matches your meaning.  
> **username_7**: Yes, this matches what I mean. Without the tube, the force required to get the spools to unwind is transferred to the extruder (possibly moving it around and decreasing print quality). With the tube in place, that force is instead applied to the mount of the tube.  

---

### Answer by username_4 on 2016-06-13. Score: 1

This shouldn't be too much of an issue, as long as:

1. You guide the filament properly to avoid breakage (at both ends as Tom mentions)
2. You avoid too much friction between the pulling extruder motor and the spool itself.

You mention that you consider using a 1-2 meter teflon tube to guide the filament. Although this *might* work, long teflon tubes will increase the friction from pulling the filament. Furthermore, I really doubt having such a long tube will be beneficial at all; quite on the contrary, I think it could be rather impractical. Most likely, having simple guides at both ends (whether its tube stubs or rings) will suffice.

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: Aha. Guides at both ends, rather than a tube all the way. I can see the sense in that. Now that I think about it, other answers (like darth pixel's) may also have hinted at this.  
> **username_4**: @mhelvens, I believe that both Tom and Darth hinted at this. Whether it's a tube or rings probably doesn't really matter that much. :-)  
> **username_7**: @TormodHaugene Actually, tube v.s. rings makes a difference. A tube has the advantage I mentioned in my answer, rings don't.  

---

### Answer by username_8 on 2016-06-13. Score: 0

Your idea is actually good, but i would add some edits to it. First of all, to keep your equipment clean, you would like to add little foam rubbers to clean the filament at the entrance of the tubes, to clean out the dust that will be accumulating over the rolls.

Another thing that i would recommend is to hang the tubes on a separate support for them and not on the extruder head, as it would add some additional friction to it and can cause the 3d model with additional friction making it distorted.

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: Can you discuss your improvements further? I am interested in the maintenance portion of your answer, in particular.  
> **username_0**: @DanBoyko: I'd be interested to see you finish that last sentence. :-)  
> **username_8**: i am really sorry, don't know why it cut the answer, i was about to say that i would damage the 3d model with additional friction making it distorted  

---

