<p>You've got several options:</p>

<h2>Generate full-size STL, cut via software later</h2>

<p>If you just have an STL, you can use software such as Meshmixer to modify it. In this case, a plain <code>plane cut</code> would suffice.</p>

<h2>Modifiy the design file</h2>

<p>A better way is to go into the design file (in your case fusion) and modify it there. In your case, it's rather easy:</p>

<ul>
<li>add a construction plane

<ul>
<li>choose the right constraints, e.g. an angle to the XZ plane or a distance to the XY plane</li>
</ul></li>
<li>choose the model

<ul>
<li><code>Edit &gt; split model</code></li>
<li>choose the construction plane you made</li>
</ul></li>
<li>rinse and repeat</li>
</ul>

<p>If you want to get rid of parts that became superfluous after this, use the <code>remove</code> option, not the <code>delete</code> option, as the later tries to make sure that the object never was made in the workflow.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-02-26T22:03:41.377Z
While this works I realized I can't delete the remaining objects that I don't need without it reverting the split and putting the object back together.  more then likely something in doing wrong
Ragekillen
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-02-26T22:32:29.990Z
@Ragekillen use `remove`.
Trish
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-02-27T18:51:09.270Z
I might add that it might be simpler to cut into 6 or 8 sections for symmetry.  And more important: redesign the subsection with some sort of interlocking tabs to facilitate assembly.  And don't pull a Morton-Thiokol!
Carl Witthoft
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-02-27T19:10:38.970Z
@CarlWitthoft for radial cuts? yes. I actually prefer to make interlocking parts with some complex cutter (Dovetail is lovely), but those are not simple...
Trish
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-02-28T07:58:04.597Z
thanks everyone. I completed my model yesterday and @Carl Witthoft I already had thought about interlocking tabs so i made small cylinders that will slide into an equivalent sized whole( most likely will have to super glue them for a finishing touch but o well).  finished product can be seen here if interested   https://gyazo.com/b7469709c80d776467f8aaf4acb3de15
Ragekillen
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-02-26T20:14:52.073Z
2019-02-26T22:32:17.993Z
2019-02-26T22:32:17.993Z
Trish
<p>I currently have a model in fusion 360 of cylinders with the largest being 40" diameter in a specific pattern as seen below. My printer is a Ender-3x with the build plate dimensions of 8.7" x 8.7" x 9.8"</p>

<p>I need to break this model into 5 pieces of exactly equivalent length so I can print same piece 5 times to equal a full cylinder </p>

<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/vp61T.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/vp61T.png" alt="enter image description here"></a> </p>

<3d-models><stl><fusion360>
how to split a 40" model into 5 parts to print seperate
Ragekillen
# how to split a 40" model into 5 parts to print seperate

(Asked by: username_0 on 2019-02-26)

I currently have a model in fusion 360 of cylinders with the largest being 40" diameter in a specific pattern as seen below. My printer is a Ender-3x with the build plate dimensions of 8.7" x 8.7" x 9.8"

I need to break this model into 5 pieces of exactly equivalent length so I can print same piece 5 times to equal a full cylinder

[![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/vp61T.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/vp61T.png)

**Tags:** 3d-models, stl, fusion360

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2019-02-26. Score: 1 | Accepted answer

You've got several options:

## Generate full-size STL, cut via software later

If you just have an STL, you can use software such as Meshmixer to modify it. In this case, a plain `plane cut` would suffice.

## Modifiy the design file

A better way is to go into the design file (in your case fusion) and modify it there. In your case, it's rather easy:

* add a construction plane
  + choose the right constraints, e.g. an angle to the XZ plane or a distance to the XY plane
* choose the model
  + `Edit > split model`
  + choose the construction plane you made
* rinse and repeat

If you want to get rid of parts that became superfluous after this, use the `remove` option, not the `delete` option, as the later tries to make sure that the object never was made in the workflow.

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: While this works I realized I can't delete the remaining objects that I don't need without it reverting the split and putting the object back together.  more then likely something in doing wrong  
> **username_1**: @Ragekillen use `remove`.  
> **username_2**: I might add that it might be simpler to cut into 6 or 8 sections for symmetry.  And more important: redesign the subsection with some sort of interlocking tabs to facilitate assembly.  And don't pull a Morton-Thiokol!  
> **username_1**: @CarlWitthoft for radial cuts? yes. I actually prefer to make interlocking parts with some complex cutter (Dovetail is lovely), but those are not simple...  
> **username_0**: thanks everyone. I completed my model yesterday and @Carl Witthoft I already had thought about interlocking tabs so i made small cylinders that will slide into an equivalent sized whole( most likely will have to super glue them for a finishing touch but o well).  finished product can be seen here if interested   https://gyazo.com/b7469709c80d776467f8aaf4acb3de15  

---

