<p>I would imagine that the main reason that &quot;major watch brands&quot; don't offer free models is so that they don't put themselves out of business. The same goes for car brands and most, if not all, other commercial products. After sales parts and repairs <em>can</em> be a significant revenue earner, and if free DIY repair solutions were provided then that revenue stream would be lost. Not to mention the probable voiding of any warranties, when the owner opens the watch up, in order to attempt the repair themselves.</p>
<p>Off the top of my head, I can't think of any commercial enterprise that offers free 3D models for parts, <em>unless</em> they have gone out of business (and not bought out by another company) and the plans have been kindly made open-source. I came across an example of this recently, via some obscure youtube video, which was an obsolete, yet well-known, computer hardware manufacturer who had made their blueprints available (circuit diagrams, source code, etc.).</p>
<p>Also, it would require a considerable amount of additional work, by the manufacturer, for all of the individual watch parts to be separately modelled accurately (into a printable 3D file format), and just would not be profitable (nor practical, given issue of accuracy raised by <a href="https://3dprinting.stackexchange.com/a/16466/4762">the answer by Tillex72</a>). In addition, and I'm guessing here and will probably be proved to be incorrect, I'd imagine that the pool of watch enthusiasts that have a 3D printer is quite small - so the target audience wouldn't be large enough to generate the demand to make it worthwhile, even if the files were made available for a considerable fee.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-06-08T08:13:24.547Z
2021-06-08T19:33:25.427Z
2021-06-08T19:33:25.427Z
Greenonline
<p>The way you manufacture a part has enormous effects on how the mechanism around it is designed. In a complex enough mechanism you can't just replace any milled part with a 3D printed one.</p>
<p>Furthermore, the answer to your question is already partly in <a href="https://www.scmp.com/magazines/style/tech-design/article/2127463/how-3d-printing-changing-swiss-luxury-watchmaking" rel="nofollow noreferrer">the article</a> you linked:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>... the technology is not mature enough for production.</p>
<p>(Tino Bobe)</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I guess the watch casing would be the only part that could be possible or reasonable to 3D-print today but would have a distinctly different look than the original, which makes it not desirable.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-06-07T13:04:49.317Z
2021-06-08T19:30:49.307Z
2021-06-08T19:30:49.307Z
Tillex72
<p>I have noticed major watches watch brands do not seem to offer manuals to 3D print your own parts.</p>
<p>Is there a reason for this?</p>
<p>I would assume in this day and age, with <a href="https://www.careeronestop.org/Toolkit/Careers/Occupations/occupation-profile.aspx?keyword=Watch%20repairers&amp;onetcode=49906400&amp;location=US" rel="nofollow noreferrer">watch repair a dying profession</a>, transitioning parts to 3D printing would be a logical next step (notice luxury watches are still very popular but <a href="https://monochrome-watches.com/top-50-swiss-watch-brands-2020-market-share-sales-editorial/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">also fluctuating</a>).</p>
<p>I have found <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_8AvZnqt5NE" rel="nofollow noreferrer">minimal information</a> on 3D printing watches.  Maybe there is another name for this science and it's not typically fit for 3D printing?  It appears some <a href="https://www.scmp.com/magazines/style/tech-design/article/2127463/how-3d-printing-changing-swiss-luxury-watchmaking" rel="nofollow noreferrer">purists</a> aren't into 3D printing.  So it appears watch parts are <a href="https://www.productionmachining.com/articles/keeping-watch-on-small-parts" rel="nofollow noreferrer">machined</a> except for the small parts.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-06-07T12:40:34.040Z
Maybe printing plastic watch bands would be practical.
Perry Webb
<metal-printing>
Metal watches 3D printing
William
# Metal watches 3D printing

(Asked by: username_0 on 2021-06-06)

I have noticed major watches watch brands do not seem to offer manuals to 3D print your own parts.

Is there a reason for this?

I would assume in this day and age, with [watch repair a dying profession](https://www.careeronestop.org/Toolkit/Careers/Occupations/occupation-profile.aspx?keyword=Watch%20repairers&onetcode=49906400&location=US), transitioning parts to 3D printing would be a logical next step (notice luxury watches are still very popular but [also fluctuating](https://monochrome-watches.com/top-50-swiss-watch-brands-2020-market-share-sales-editorial/)).

I have found [minimal information](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_8AvZnqt5NE) on 3D printing watches. Maybe there is another name for this science and it's not typically fit for 3D printing? It appears some [purists](https://www.scmp.com/magazines/style/tech-design/article/2127463/how-3d-printing-changing-swiss-luxury-watchmaking) aren't into 3D printing. So it appears watch parts are [machined](https://www.productionmachining.com/articles/keeping-watch-on-small-parts) except for the small parts.

**Tags:** metal-printing
> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: Maybe printing plastic watch bands would be practical.  

---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_2 on 2021-06-08. Score: 1

I would imagine that the main reason that "major watch brands" don't offer free models is so that they don't put themselves out of business. The same goes for car brands and most, if not all, other commercial products. After sales parts and repairs *can* be a significant revenue earner, and if free DIY repair solutions were provided then that revenue stream would be lost. Not to mention the probable voiding of any warranties, when the owner opens the watch up, in order to attempt the repair themselves.

Off the top of my head, I can't think of any commercial enterprise that offers free 3D models for parts, *unless* they have gone out of business (and not bought out by another company) and the plans have been kindly made open-source. I came across an example of this recently, via some obscure youtube video, which was an obsolete, yet well-known, computer hardware manufacturer who had made their blueprints available (circuit diagrams, source code, etc.).

Also, it would require a considerable amount of additional work, by the manufacturer, for all of the individual watch parts to be separately modelled accurately (into a printable 3D file format), and just would not be profitable (nor practical, given issue of accuracy raised by [the answer by Tillex72](https://3dprinting.stackexchange.com/a/16466/4762)). In addition, and I'm guessing here and will probably be proved to be incorrect, I'd imagine that the pool of watch enthusiasts that have a 3D printer is quite small - so the target audience wouldn't be large enough to generate the demand to make it worthwhile, even if the files were made available for a considerable fee.


---

### Answer by username_3 on 2021-06-07. Score: 1

The way you manufacture a part has enormous effects on how the mechanism around it is designed. In a complex enough mechanism you can't just replace any milled part with a 3D printed one.

Furthermore, the answer to your question is already partly in [the article](https://www.scmp.com/magazines/style/tech-design/article/2127463/how-3d-printing-changing-swiss-luxury-watchmaking) you linked:

> ... the technology is not mature enough for production.
>
> (Tino Bobe)

I guess the watch casing would be the only part that could be possible or reasonable to 3D-print today but would have a distinctly different look than the original, which makes it not desirable.


---

