<p>There should be no problem in doing so -- mix and match features from the various source languages. A precedent for this, for example, is English:</p>
<ul>
<li>The syntax/grammar is mainly Germanic, including many function words</li>
<li>The vocabulary is mixed (Latin, Norse, Anglo-Saxon, Norman French, Indian, etc.)</li>
</ul>
<p>I would choose one language as the &quot;base&quot; (in the English case, it's Old English/Anglo-Saxon) and then modify it by replacing/adding some of the vocabulary from the different languages. Also, some grammatical features (morphological endings, etc.) could be mixed up.</p>
<p>If you do it iteratively (i.e., revising the language multiple times, simulating contact between the current version and another influencing language), you can also take into account other types of changes, such as dropping endings that are harder to pronounce or making higher frequent words shorter and less regular.</p>
<p>What you do exactly is up to you, but there shouldn't be any problem from a linguistic point of view.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-06-24T08:14:57.577Z
2022-09-20T08:02:11.020Z
2022-09-20T08:02:11.020Z
Oliver Mason
<p>Possible? Definitely yes!</p>
<p>But I want to give you some more hints on how to do it:</p>
<p><em>Based on common features:</em> When choosing the sounds for your conlang, prefer those that have broad coverage in your language base, and avoid those that are specific to only one. Do the same for syllable structure; look at what consonants can cluster with each other in a lot of your base languages.</p>
<p><em>Select common words:</em> Look what words already have crossed the language boundaries and appear as loan words in other languages. These words are hot candidates for inclusion in your conlang. Note also that the process of loaning words tends to result in phonological and morphological simplifications; consider adopting these simplifications as well.</p>
<p><em>Morphology:</em> Look for common categories expressed by morphology in the base languages and use a simplified system. While Arabic morphology (inflectional and derivational) is elegant and impressive, it does not carry well over to languages with a different structure (no triconsonantal roots). But you still can borrow some elements from it (e.g., prefixes and suffixes). Make sure to create at least some derivational morphology; it will simplify the language and the process of creating the vocab.</p>
<p><em>Syntax:</em> Check out the basic word order and how to form relative and subordinate clauses in your base language and create a syntax from this information. Also, look for <em>word order</em> phenomena (adjectives before or after the noun, prepositions or postpositions, genitives before or after the noun) and decide how to do them.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-06-25T12:43:14.763Z
2022-09-16T09:08:51.913Z
2022-09-16T09:08:51.913Z
Sir Cornflakes
<p>I wonder how it is possible to construct a language based on the existing languages. My country has Indo-European, Altaic, Semitic, and a small portion of Dravidian and Caucasic languages. I am thinking of a constructed language based on all these languages.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-06-23T12:28:57.877Z
Hello and welcome to our site! This is a very broad question... Could you narrow it down to something more specific?
curiousdannii
<conlang-creation><naturalism><zonal-languages>
Constructing a language based on existing languages from different families
# Constructing a language based on existing languages from different families

(Asked by: username_0 on 2019-06-23)

I wonder how it is possible to construct a language based on the existing languages. My country has Indo-European, Altaic, Semitic, and a small portion of Dravidian and Caucasic languages. I am thinking of a constructed language based on all these languages.

**Tags:** conlang-creation, naturalism, zonal-languages
> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: Hello and welcome to our site! This is a very broad question... Could you narrow it down to something more specific?  

---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_2 on 2019-06-24. Score: 4 | Accepted answer

There should be no problem in doing so -- mix and match features from the various source languages. A precedent for this, for example, is English:

* The syntax/grammar is mainly Germanic, including many function words
* The vocabulary is mixed (Latin, Norse, Anglo-Saxon, Norman French, Indian, etc.)

I would choose one language as the "base" (in the English case, it's Old English/Anglo-Saxon) and then modify it by replacing/adding some of the vocabulary from the different languages. Also, some grammatical features (morphological endings, etc.) could be mixed up.

If you do it iteratively (i.e., revising the language multiple times, simulating contact between the current version and another influencing language), you can also take into account other types of changes, such as dropping endings that are harder to pronounce or making higher frequent words shorter and less regular.

What you do exactly is up to you, but there shouldn't be any problem from a linguistic point of view.


---

### Answer by username_3 on 2019-06-25. Score: 2

Possible? Definitely yes!

But I want to give you some more hints on how to do it:

*Based on common features:* When choosing the sounds for your conlang, prefer those that have broad coverage in your language base, and avoid those that are specific to only one. Do the same for syllable structure; look at what consonants can cluster with each other in a lot of your base languages.

*Select common words:* Look what words already have crossed the language boundaries and appear as loan words in other languages. These words are hot candidates for inclusion in your conlang. Note also that the process of loaning words tends to result in phonological and morphological simplifications; consider adopting these simplifications as well.

*Morphology:* Look for common categories expressed by morphology in the base languages and use a simplified system. While Arabic morphology (inflectional and derivational) is elegant and impressive, it does not carry well over to languages with a different structure (no triconsonantal roots). But you still can borrow some elements from it (e.g., prefixes and suffixes). Make sure to create at least some derivational morphology; it will simplify the language and the process of creating the vocab.

*Syntax:* Check out the basic word order and how to form relative and subordinate clauses in your base language and create a syntax from this information. Also, look for *word order* phenomena (adjectives before or after the noun, prepositions or postpositions, genitives before or after the noun) and decide how to do them.


---

