<p>When you use the word 外遇, it is a noun. It should be王先生有了外遇。外遇的对象是李小姐。</p>
<p>有了外遇 is the verb phrase for the noun 外遇. The 3rd person need to be mentioned in a separated sentence. In this way, you know who is the one betrayed the marriage and who is the 3rd person. And the 3rd person's marriage status is not mentioned, it can be anything.</p>
<p>Headlines sometimes tend to use super compact expressions, which are not common elsewhere. Like 或 means 可能， 拟 means 打算. Here I guess is the same thing, even though it is not common to say so, it saves space .</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-11-02T08:07:18.180Z
Just the opposite from "suicide". "自杀" in Chinese can be both noun and verb, but "suicide" must be "commited" in English, because it's a noun.
Winfred Huang
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-10-23T11:40:54.793Z
2020-10-23T11:47:03.287Z
2020-10-23T11:47:03.287Z
River
<p>王先生外遇李小姐 and 王先生跟李小姐有外遇 have very similar meaning.</p>
<p>The meaning of 王先生外遇(了)李小姐 would be 王先生 who took the initiative to 外遇李小姐.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-10-23T07:38:05.597Z
I saw sentences like that on a news headline from Taiwan, but I suspect it is not universally accepted in the Mandarin-speaking world.
Apollyon
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-10-23T08:55:50.797Z
That's because 外遇 is, in a certain context, a loaded term. It could mean an innocuous date, or an illicit affair. Use it cautiously.
Wayne Cheah
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-10-23T09:55:59.637Z
I mean, I suspect it's not universally accepted for the grammatical reason that "外遇" cannot be a transitive verb. It's uncontroversial to say "王先生跟李小姐外遇."
Apollyon
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-10-23T07:28:20.903Z
2020-10-23T11:47:37.863Z
2020-10-23T11:47:37.863Z
HungYu Chang
<p>Is 外遇 used correctly as a transitive verb in the following sentence?</p>
<blockquote>
<p>王先生<strong>外遇</strong>李小姐。</p>
</blockquote>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-10-23T06:39:02.410Z
perhaps 王先生跟李小姐有外遇? I've never seen the term 外遇 before but from looking online it seems to be a noun
小奥利奥
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-10-23T23:29:13.837Z
王先生外遇李小姐。is ok to say colloquially, though 外遇 is normally a noun.
dan
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-10-24T05:05:41.900Z
That usage as a transitive verb  was unheard-of two decades ago.
Apollyon
<verbs>
transitive verb in Mandarin:外遇李小姐
# transitive verb in Mandarin:外遇李小姐

(Asked by: username_0 on 2020-10-23)

Is 外遇 used correctly as a transitive verb in the following sentence?

> 王先生**外遇**李小姐。

**Tags:** verbs
> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: perhaps 王先生跟李小姐有外遇? I've never seen the term 外遇 before but from looking online it seems to be a noun  
> **username_2**: 王先生外遇李小姐。is ok to say colloquially, though 外遇 is normally a noun.  
> **username_0**: That usage as a transitive verb  was unheard-of two decades ago.  

---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_3 on 2020-10-23. Score: 1

When you use the word 外遇, it is a noun. It should be王先生有了外遇。外遇的对象是李小姐。

有了外遇 is the verb phrase for the noun 外遇. The 3rd person need to be mentioned in a separated sentence. In this way, you know who is the one betrayed the marriage and who is the 3rd person. And the 3rd person's marriage status is not mentioned, it can be anything.

Headlines sometimes tend to use super compact expressions, which are not common elsewhere. Like 或 means 可能， 拟 means 打算. Here I guess is the same thing, even though it is not common to say so, it saves space .

> **Comments:**
> **username_4**: Just the opposite from "suicide". "自杀" in Chinese can be both noun and verb, but "suicide" must be "commited" in English, because it's a noun.  

---

### Answer by username_5 on 2020-10-23. Score: -1

王先生外遇李小姐 and 王先生跟李小姐有外遇 have very similar meaning.

The meaning of 王先生外遇(了)李小姐 would be 王先生 who took the initiative to 外遇李小姐.

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: I saw sentences like that on a news headline from Taiwan, but I suspect it is not universally accepted in the Mandarin-speaking world.  
> **username_6**: That's because 外遇 is, in a certain context, a loaded term. It could mean an innocuous date, or an illicit affair. Use it cautiously.  
> **username_0**: I mean, I suspect it's not universally accepted for the grammatical reason that "外遇" cannot be a transitive verb. It's uncontroversial to say "王先生跟李小姐外遇."  

---

