<p>Yes, both are meant approximation, but 大概 is a gross estimation - the house is approximately 900 sf; 左右 implies a calculated estimation - the house is 900 sf plus or minus.</p>
<p>大概 also can be used to express perceived uncertainty - 大概不好吧. 大概快到了. It is used in both measurable and non-measurable matters/objects.</p>
<p>左右 is used on the measurable matters/objects, like area, volume, dollar, distance...etc.</p>
<p>They can be used together, 這房子的面積大概在九十平方米左右 - The house's floor area is approximately 90 square meter, plus or minus. Note, in here, 大概 can be replaced by &quot;大約&quot;, which is another term for approximation.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-04-26T15:48:53.103Z
2021-04-26T15:48:53.103Z
r13
<p>I can't give you why there is a difference in word sequence, but I can give you an example</p>
<p>The house is roughly 90 sq meters.</p>
<ol>
<li>'这栋房子<strong>大概</strong>(有)90平方米'。</li>
<li>'这栋房子(有)90平方米<strong>左右</strong>'。</li>
</ol>
<p>both correct, but</p>
<ol start="3">
<li>'这栋房子左右(有)90平方米'</li>
</ol>
<p>is not valid. This is actually a wrong/weird way of saying &quot;there are 90 sq meters on (to) the left and also 90 sq meters on (to) the right of the house&quot;. Which should really be '这栋房子左边有90平方米，右边有90平方米' Still, what you are trying to say is not clear? is this the size of the house or the size of the yard to the left and to the right of the house</p>
<p>Now '左右' has the their original meanings when preceding, to (on) the left(左） and to (on) the right（右）.</p>
<p>But '大概' never means directions (left, right)
It means</p>
<ol>
<li>rough(ly), approximate(ly), about，probably</li>
<li>Maybe, seems</li>
</ol>
<p>Informally, '大概' could also follow. E.g. '房子九十平方米（，）大概' （comma is optional, but this is just oral so doesn't matter..</p>
<p>but '左右' never precede in these kind of case.</p>
<p>There are many differences in grammar between English and Chinese, I would not suggest compare grammar. I would say Chinese grammar is not as systematic as English grammar, or it was a bad idea to create grammar for Chinese in English grammar style (just my opinion)</p>
<p>To my knowledge, there is no simple/systemic explanation of why there is a word sequence difference. Even ‘左右’ means roughly in this case, it is not an adv. in grammar definition.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-04-26T23:05:31.577Z
“ it was a bad idea to create grammar for Chinese in English grammar style ” Very, very true!! Western Grammar is a mess and doesn't even explain English! It will never explain the workings of Chinese! The most basic concepts of Western Grammar remain undefined: define: 'Subject' or: 'Sentence'
Pedroski
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-04-27T00:20:23.147Z
You cannot "create" grammar. Grammar is a natural part of any language. If by "western grammar" or "english grammar" you mean to say "the western study and categorization of grammar" then please direct me to the nearest chinese equivalent
小奥利奥
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-04-27T07:29:11.317Z
'grammar': "a set of actual or presumed prescriptive notions about correct use of a language." 'grammar' is fluid. 'grammar' in its Western sense was originally: "How to write Latin correctly" Latin being a language with 6 cases, noun declensions and verb inflections. Words without declensions or inflections are known as particles. This is a set of man-made rules, created by men. The basic notions of modern Western Grammar are undefined and undefinable. It is an art form not a scientific study of language. Please direct me to the scientific definitions of the "prescriptive notions" of grammar.
Pedroski
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-04-29T07:59:51.350Z
这栋房子左右(有)90平方米 is correct but with another different meaning：this house have more or less 90 sq meters。（这栋房子多多少少有90平方米）
imkzh
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-04-26T22:10:21.067Z
2021-04-26T22:10:21.067Z
user28077
<p>Tl;dr: We can approach the question using classical Chinese. <code>左右</code> is originally a noun modified by the uncertain measurement that goes before it. <code>概</code> seems to only work as a preceding adverb.</p>
<ol>
<li><p>For the sole purpose of justifying <code>左右</code> as being exclusively a complement (補語) but not otherwise (i.e., a preceding adverb / 狀語), I think there is no harm in looking at the word literally (which is also probably its etymology).</p>
<p>We know in classical Chinese <code>左右</code> as a noun means 'two sides', or more commonly, as a syndecdoche (借代) meaning 'courtiers':</p>
<blockquote>
<p><strong>左右</strong>欲刃相如，相如張目叱之，<strong>左右</strong>皆靡。《史記·廉頗藺相如列傳》</p>
<p><em>The courtiers</em> wished to slay Xiangru. But Xiangru berated them in return, his eyes wide open, and they all retreated. (<em>Shiji</em> 81)</p>
</blockquote>
<p>With this in mind it is not hard to think of your phrase as</p>
<blockquote>
<p>九十平方米之左右 (lit. the two sides of 90 sq m; meaning anywhere close to 90 sq m),</p>
</blockquote>
<p>which actually makes <code>九十平方米</code> the preceding adjective (定語) of the phrase. Over time, however, it becomes more natural to treat <code>九十平方米–左右</code> not as a modifier–noun (定語–名詞) phrase, but a nominal word group–complement phrase (名詞詞組–補語).</p>
</li>
<li><p>This is in stark contrast to the stabler historical nature of <code>大概</code> (or <code>概</code> in classical Chinese) as a preceding adverb (狀語):</p>
<blockquote>
<p>余以所聞，（許）由、（務）光義至高，其文辭不少<strong>概</strong>見，何哉？《史記·伯夷列傳》</p>
<p>Now from what I have heard, Xu You and Wu Guang were supposed to have had the highest sense of right — why is it, then, that they are not even mentioned <em>in passing</em> in Confucius' writing? (<em>Shiji</em> 61, tr. Owen 1946)</p>
</blockquote>
<p><code>不少</code> (not at the very least) and <code>概</code> (in brief) precede and are clearly adverbial on <code>見</code> (to be seen).</p>
<p>The positioning of <code>概</code> appears to be less flexible than say <code>盡</code> (you can have <code>吃盡</code> but <code>盡訴</code> in modern Chinese; see my third point <a href="https://chinese.stackexchange.com/a/43523/27428">here</a>). That is also observed in words like <code>概括</code> (but not <code>*括概</code>), for example.</p>
</li>
</ol>
<p><strong>Reference:</strong>
Owen, Stephen. <em>An Anthology of Chinese Literature: Beginnings to 1911</em>. New York: W. W. Norton, 1996.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-04-27T22:14:13.967Z
Good ideas! Thanks! If course, Chinese being Chinese, it likes enveloping combinations: 房子大概九十平方米左右。
Pedroski
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-04-27T14:46:36.850Z
2021-04-27T14:52:28.193Z
2021-04-27T14:52:28.193Z
L Parker
<p>房子大概九十平方米。<br />
房子九十平方米左右。</p>
<p>I believe, 大概，左右 both mean: roughly, approximately.</p>
<p>Why should/must 大概 precede and 左右 follow?</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-04-26T16:28:03.560Z
大概 is an adjective, 左右 is a noun.
sfy
CC BY-SA 4.0
2021-04-27T05:51:44.980Z
左右 more or less; plus or minus;
Zhang
<meaning><word-order>
The difference between 左右 and 大概
# The difference between 左右 and 大概

(Asked by: username_0 on 2021-04-26)

房子大概九十平方米。  
房子九十平方米左右。

I believe, 大概，左右 both mean: roughly, approximately.

Why should/must 大概 precede and 左右 follow?

**Tags:** meaning, word-order
> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: 大概 is an adjective, 左右 is a noun.  
> **username_2**: 左右 more or less; plus or minus;  

---

## 3 answers

### Answer by username_3 on 2021-04-26. Score: 2

Yes, both are meant approximation, but 大概 is a gross estimation - the house is approximately 900 sf; 左右 implies a calculated estimation - the house is 900 sf plus or minus.

大概 also can be used to express perceived uncertainty - 大概不好吧. 大概快到了. It is used in both measurable and non-measurable matters/objects.

左右 is used on the measurable matters/objects, like area, volume, dollar, distance...etc.

They can be used together, 這房子的面積大概在九十平方米左右 - The house's floor area is approximately 90 square meter, plus or minus. Note, in here, 大概 can be replaced by "大約", which is another term for approximation.


---

### Answer by username_4 on 2021-04-26. Score: 1

I can't give you why there is a difference in word sequence, but I can give you an example

The house is roughly 90 sq meters.

1. '这栋房子**大概**(有)90平方米'。
2. '这栋房子(有)90平方米**左右**'。

both correct, but

3. '这栋房子左右(有)90平方米'

is not valid. This is actually a wrong/weird way of saying "there are 90 sq meters on (to) the left and also 90 sq meters on (to) the right of the house". Which should really be '这栋房子左边有90平方米，右边有90平方米' Still, what you are trying to say is not clear? is this the size of the house or the size of the yard to the left and to the right of the house

Now '左右' has the their original meanings when preceding, to (on) the left(左） and to (on) the right（右）.

But '大概' never means directions (left, right)
It means

1. rough(ly), approximate(ly), about，probably
2. Maybe, seems

Informally, '大概' could also follow. E.g. '房子九十平方米（，）大概' （comma is optional, but this is just oral so doesn't matter..

but '左右' never precede in these kind of case.

There are many differences in grammar between English and Chinese, I would not suggest compare grammar. I would say Chinese grammar is not as systematic as English grammar, or it was a bad idea to create grammar for Chinese in English grammar style (just my opinion)

To my knowledge, there is no simple/systemic explanation of why there is a word sequence difference. Even ‘左右’ means roughly in this case, it is not an adv. in grammar definition.

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: “ it was a bad idea to create grammar for Chinese in English grammar style ” Very, very true!! Western Grammar is a mess and doesn't even explain English! It will never explain the workings of Chinese! The most basic concepts of Western Grammar remain undefined: define: 'Subject' or: 'Sentence'  
> **username_5**: You cannot "create" grammar. Grammar is a natural part of any language. If by "western grammar" or "english grammar" you mean to say "the western study and categorization of grammar" then please direct me to the nearest chinese equivalent  
> **username_0**: 'grammar': "a set of actual or presumed prescriptive notions about correct use of a language." 'grammar' is fluid. 'grammar' in its Western sense was originally: "How to write Latin correctly" Latin being a language with 6 cases, noun declensions and verb inflections. Words without declensions or inflections are known as particles. This is a set of man-made rules, created by men. The basic notions of modern Western Grammar are undefined and undefinable. It is an art form not a scientific study of language. Please direct me to the scientific definitions of the "prescriptive notions" of grammar.  
> **username_6**: 这栋房子左右(有)90平方米 is correct but with another different meaning：this house have more or less 90 sq meters。（这栋房子多多少少有90平方米）  

---

### Answer by username_7 on 2021-04-27. Score: 1

Tl;dr: We can approach the question using classical Chinese. `左右` is originally a noun modified by the uncertain measurement that goes before it. `概` seems to only work as a preceding adverb.

1. For the sole purpose of justifying `左右` as being exclusively a complement (補語) but not otherwise (i.e., a preceding adverb / 狀語), I think there is no harm in looking at the word literally (which is also probably its etymology).

   We know in classical Chinese `左右` as a noun means 'two sides', or more commonly, as a syndecdoche (借代) meaning 'courtiers':

   > **左右**欲刃相如，相如張目叱之，**左右**皆靡。《史記·廉頗藺相如列傳》
   >
   > *The courtiers* wished to slay Xiangru. But Xiangru berated them in return, his eyes wide open, and they all retreated. (*Shiji* 81)

   With this in mind it is not hard to think of your phrase as

   > 九十平方米之左右 (lit. the two sides of 90 sq m; meaning anywhere close to 90 sq m),

   which actually makes `九十平方米` the preceding adjective (定語) of the phrase. Over time, however, it becomes more natural to treat `九十平方米–左右` not as a modifier–noun (定語–名詞) phrase, but a nominal word group–complement phrase (名詞詞組–補語).
2. This is in stark contrast to the stabler historical nature of `大概` (or `概` in classical Chinese) as a preceding adverb (狀語):

   > 余以所聞，（許）由、（務）光義至高，其文辭不少**概**見，何哉？《史記·伯夷列傳》
   >
   > Now from what I have heard, Xu You and Wu Guang were supposed to have had the highest sense of right — why is it, then, that they are not even mentioned *in passing* in Confucius' writing? (*Shiji* 61, tr. Owen 1946)

   `不少` (not at the very least) and `概` (in brief) precede and are clearly adverbial on `見` (to be seen).

   The positioning of `概` appears to be less flexible than say `盡` (you can have `吃盡` but `盡訴` in modern Chinese; see my third point [here](https://chinese.stackexchange.com/a/43523/27428)). That is also observed in words like `概括` (but not `*括概`), for example.

**Reference:**
Owen, Stephen. *An Anthology of Chinese Literature: Beginnings to 1911*. New York: W. W. Norton, 1996.

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: Good ideas! Thanks! If course, Chinese being Chinese, it likes enveloping combinations: 房子大概九十平方米左右。  

---

