<p>I think your question can only be answered if framed right, i.e.</p>

<p>When I write a given character this or that way, </p>

<ul>
<li>will people be able to read it? </li>
<li>will I get bad marks in an exam?</li>
<li>will many people consider it wrong?</li>
<li>am I following/violating a long-standing tradition? </li>
</ul>

<p>and so on. One way to answer your question is the easy way out: just adhere to a well-known, published standard. In that case, there's clearly one right and many wrong ways to write a character, and @dan basically answered it: "The simple answer is 'wrong'. 男 is 田 + 力". Unfortunately, those prescriptive standards are often wrong or problematic themselves.</p>

<p>The more interesting way to answer your question is to look at how writers in the past and present actually do write a given character, and then decide whether you want to break or bend the apparent rules or rather follow them. In your specific case, I'd look at the many samples given at <a href="http://shufa.guoxuedashi.com/7537/1/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://shufa.guoxuedashi.com/7537/1/</a> (kaishu), <a href="http://shufa.guoxuedashi.com/7537/2/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://shufa.guoxuedashi.com/7537/2/</a> (xingshu) and <a href="http://shufa.guoxuedashi.com/7537/3/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://shufa.guoxuedashi.com/7537/3/</a> (caoshu); I think what you can easily see there is that while there's plenty of evidence for a historical variant of 男 that has something like  under the 田, there's not a single sample where 田 and 力 share the vertical stroke. </p>

<p>This leads me to answer your question with "you probably don't want to write 男 with a single vertical stroke because you'd be the only one to do so".</p>

<p>@nichijou's answer ("you break the consistency of writing any character with a 田") is generally reasonable, but then there <em>are</em> singular characters that are habitually or even prescriptively written in ways that are inconsistent, e.g. look at 所; it is often written like  even in kaishu, and at any rate the left part retains the form 戶 although it should be 户 in the PRC.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-11-07T14:19:40.907Z
2017-11-07T14:19:40.907Z
John Frazer
<p>even for daily writing, I think it's a bad choice, since you break the consistency of writing any character with a 田</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-11-07T07:33:54.467Z
2017-11-07T07:33:54.467Z
nichijou
<p>Wrong, even if you want to be faster or lazily. </p>

<p>It is a convention that some strokes can be linked, some can not, some components can be reduced, some can not. If people break that convention in daily writings, he will not get a good impression from others.</p>

<p>If you don't know how, it is always a good habit to write strokes one by one.  </p>

<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/tn5ls.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/tn5ls.png" alt="enter image description here"></a></p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-11-08T16:09:05.870Z
2017-11-09T08:58:37.830Z
2017-11-09T08:58:37.830Z
sfy
<p>The simple answer is 'wrong'. 男 is 田 + 力. </p>

<p>It might be ok for daily writing, but it would be wrong for any type of exams. </p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-11-04T08:32:47.677Z
2017-11-04T08:32:47.677Z
dan
<p>Wiktionary gives the stroke order for <a href="https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%E7%94%B7" rel="nofollow noreferrer">男</a> as:</p>

<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/JDIdD.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/JDIdD.png" alt="Stroke order for 男"></a></p>

<p>I'm wondering if it's wrong to merge the two vertical strokes like this:</p>

<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/QokmK.jpg" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/QokmK.jpg" alt="writing 男 by combining two strokes"></a></p>

<p><strong>Question</strong>: Is it legitimate to write 男 merging the two vertical strokes?</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-11-04T06:50:42.047Z
As long as you know the correct stoke order of '男', it is not a problem to write it in a slightly modified form ( in hand writing) as a personal style. I write my last name 'Ho' with the vertical  stoke in 'H' extends  and touching the 'O' .
Tang Ho
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-11-04T12:19:28.700Z
as long as user does not forget the correct number of strokes
user6065
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-11-04T13:12:07.203Z
As long as there're no minimal pairs, I would not pay attention to prescriptivist advice; actually, different typefaces and fonts merge them.
GJC
<handwriting>
Is it legitimate to write 男 merging the two vertical strokes?
# Is it legitimate to write 男 merging the two vertical strokes?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2017-11-04)

Wiktionary gives the stroke order for [男](https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%E7%94%B7) as:

[![Stroke order for 男](https://i.sstatic.net/JDIdD.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/JDIdD.png)

I'm wondering if it's wrong to merge the two vertical strokes like this:

[![writing 男 by combining two strokes](https://i.sstatic.net/QokmK.jpg)](https://i.sstatic.net/QokmK.jpg)

**Question**: Is it legitimate to write 男 merging the two vertical strokes?

**Tags:** handwriting
> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: As long as you know the correct stoke order of '男', it is not a problem to write it in a slightly modified form ( in hand writing) as a personal style. I write my last name 'Ho' with the vertical  stoke in 'H' extends  and touching the 'O' .  
> **username_2**: as long as user does not forget the correct number of strokes  
> **username_3**: As long as there're no minimal pairs, I would not pay attention to prescriptivist advice; actually, different typefaces and fonts merge them.  

---

## 4 answers

### Answer by username_7 on 2017-11-04. Score: 3 | Accepted answer

The simple answer is 'wrong'. 男 is 田 + 力.

It might be ok for daily writing, but it would be wrong for any type of exams.


---

### Answer by username_4 on 2017-11-07. Score: 2

I think your question can only be answered if framed right, i.e.

When I write a given character this or that way,

* will people be able to read it?
* will I get bad marks in an exam?
* will many people consider it wrong?
* am I following/violating a long-standing tradition?

and so on. One way to answer your question is the easy way out: just adhere to a well-known, published standard. In that case, there's clearly one right and many wrong ways to write a character, and @dan basically answered it: "The simple answer is 'wrong'. 男 is 田 + 力". Unfortunately, those prescriptive standards are often wrong or problematic themselves.

The more interesting way to answer your question is to look at how writers in the past and present actually do write a given character, and then decide whether you want to break or bend the apparent rules or rather follow them. In your specific case, I'd look at the many samples given at <http://shufa.guoxuedashi.com/7537/1/> (kaishu), <http://shufa.guoxuedashi.com/7537/2/> (xingshu) and <http://shufa.guoxuedashi.com/7537/3/> (caoshu); I think what you can easily see there is that while there's plenty of evidence for a historical variant of 男 that has something like under the 田, there's not a single sample where 田 and 力 share the vertical stroke.

This leads me to answer your question with "you probably don't want to write 男 with a single vertical stroke because you'd be the only one to do so".

@nichijou's answer ("you break the consistency of writing any character with a 田") is generally reasonable, but then there *are* singular characters that are habitually or even prescriptively written in ways that are inconsistent, e.g. look at 所; it is often written like even in kaishu, and at any rate the left part retains the form 戶 although it should be 户 in the PRC.


---

### Answer by username_5 on 2017-11-07. Score: 1

even for daily writing, I think it's a bad choice, since you break the consistency of writing any character with a 田


---

### Answer by username_6 on 2017-11-08. Score: 1

Wrong, even if you want to be faster or lazily.

It is a convention that some strokes can be linked, some can not, some components can be reduced, some can not. If people break that convention in daily writings, he will not get a good impression from others.

If you don't know how, it is always a good habit to write strokes one by one.

[![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/tn5ls.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/tn5ls.png)


---

