<p>I found <a href="http://www.chinesetest.cn/gonewcontent.do?id=5589387" rel="nofollow noreferrer">this report</a> provided by the institution that runs the Chinese Proficiency Test (HSK). The report was about the tests that took place in year 2010, which was ten years ago, so things may have changed a bit, but I think we can still get a general idea from it.</p>
<p>According to the report, before November 2009, HSK had three levels: elementary, intermediate and advanced. After then it became the new HSK, which has six levels where six is the highest.</p>
<p>Since there is no good definition of &quot;can speak Chinese&quot;, let us assume people who passed the highest level of HSK can speak Chinese. (The two concepts do not equal, but that's the best we can get.)</p>
<p>I don't know how to edit tables here, so I had to paste pictures of the tables (translated into English by me) from that report.
<a href="https://i.sstatic.net/zQFkb.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/zQFkb.png" alt="enter image description here" /></a></p>
<p>As we can see, there were 12099 people who passed the HSK 6 test in year 2010.</p>
<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/Q6biJ.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/Q6biJ.png" alt="enter image description here" /></a></p>
<p>It is noted in the report that in the second half year of 2010, the test stopped asking examinees for this information of whether they are of Chinese origin or not, so the numbers here are smaller than the total number.</p>
<p>From the table we can see there are only about 15% of people who are of Chinese origin, so most of the examinees are not of Chinese origin.</p>
<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/mGQsu.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/mGQsu.png" alt="enter image description here" /></a></p>
<p>So most examinees are from Asia. The other continents have only a few hundreds together for HSK 6, and we don't know how many of them actually passed.</p>
<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/WrWXy.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/WrWXy.png" alt="enter image description here" /></a></p>
<p>Country information. We don't know which level they took or whether they passed, but if the proportion does not vary very much, we can have an educated guess.</p>
<p>12099 people passed the HSK 6 test in year 2010 and 86.75% of the total examinees of HSK 6 are non-Chinese, so that's about 10 thousand people. Let us multiply that with 20 for all the years and that makes 200 thousand people globally. Africa only has 0.64% so that's about 1000 people. Oceania (0.77%) has only a few more than Africa. That's above 130, but maybe the source in the OP has a higher standard for Chinese proficiency, or people of Chinese origin has a higher chance of passing the test, so for such a rough estimation, I think the numbers are reasonable.</p>
<p>Other interesting statistics:
<a href="https://i.sstatic.net/mLSIB.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/mLSIB.png" alt="enter image description here" /></a>
American people are actually very good at listening!</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-08-24T09:04:41.053Z
2020-08-24T09:21:39.247Z
2020-08-24T09:21:39.247Z
Betty
<p>I have been reading about the rapid expansion of the Confucius Institute program and am interested in what its 'results' have been in terms of actually producing people who can speak 普通话.</p>
<p>I have found an answer in the context of Australia, <a href="https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-06-24/fact-checka-are-there-only-130-people-who-can-speak-mandarin/11235484" rel="nofollow noreferrer">where the estimate was about 130:</a></p>
<blockquote>
<p>&quot;while there were probably more than 130 Australians of non-Chinese
background who could speak good conversational Chinese, there were
probably fewer than 130 who could read, write and speak Chinese with
the proficiency necessary for the highest professional levels.&quot;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I am particularly interested in the context of Africa, although finding good data on this from anywhere has proven difficult.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-08-23T10:43:52.353Z
Only 130? Wow, that's really a long way to go.
Betty
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-08-23T12:36:19.373Z
There are a few details here that might be of aid to you: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_as_a_foreign_language
Mou某
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-08-24T07:01:06.393Z
Are you asking for "can speak Chinese" or "can read, write and speak Chinese with the proficiency necessary for the highest professional levels"? These are two completely different questions.
Olle Linge
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-08-24T08:20:30.887Z
I have deliberately not specified exactly what the criteria is - as the article I have referenced shows, every study tends to define its own criteria. At this point I would accept a detailed answer under any reasonable criteria.
Burrough Clarke
<learning>
How many non-native speakers of Chinese are there?
# How many non-native speakers of Chinese are there?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2020-08-23)

I have been reading about the rapid expansion of the Confucius Institute program and am interested in what its 'results' have been in terms of actually producing people who can speak 普通话.

I have found an answer in the context of Australia, [where the estimate was about 130:](https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-06-24/fact-checka-are-there-only-130-people-who-can-speak-mandarin/11235484)

> "while there were probably more than 130 Australians of non-Chinese
> background who could speak good conversational Chinese, there were
> probably fewer than 130 who could read, write and speak Chinese with
> the proficiency necessary for the highest professional levels."

I am particularly interested in the context of Africa, although finding good data on this from anywhere has proven difficult.

**Tags:** learning
> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: Only 130? Wow, that's really a long way to go.  
> **username_2**: There are a few details here that might be of aid to you: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_as_a_foreign_language  
> **username_3**: Are you asking for "can speak Chinese" or "can read, write and speak Chinese with the proficiency necessary for the highest professional levels"? These are two completely different questions.  
> **username_0**: I have deliberately not specified exactly what the criteria is - as the article I have referenced shows, every study tends to define its own criteria. At this point I would accept a detailed answer under any reasonable criteria.  

---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2020-08-24. Score: 7 | Accepted answer

I found [this report](http://www.chinesetest.cn/gonewcontent.do?id=5589387) provided by the institution that runs the Chinese Proficiency Test (HSK). The report was about the tests that took place in year 2010, which was ten years ago, so things may have changed a bit, but I think we can still get a general idea from it.

According to the report, before November 2009, HSK had three levels: elementary, intermediate and advanced. After then it became the new HSK, which has six levels where six is the highest.

Since there is no good definition of "can speak Chinese", let us assume people who passed the highest level of HSK can speak Chinese. (The two concepts do not equal, but that's the best we can get.)

I don't know how to edit tables here, so I had to paste pictures of the tables (translated into English by me) from that report.
[![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/zQFkb.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/zQFkb.png)

As we can see, there were 12099 people who passed the HSK 6 test in year 2010.

[![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/Q6biJ.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/Q6biJ.png)

It is noted in the report that in the second half year of 2010, the test stopped asking examinees for this information of whether they are of Chinese origin or not, so the numbers here are smaller than the total number.

From the table we can see there are only about 15% of people who are of Chinese origin, so most of the examinees are not of Chinese origin.

[![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/mGQsu.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/mGQsu.png)

So most examinees are from Asia. The other continents have only a few hundreds together for HSK 6, and we don't know how many of them actually passed.

[![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/WrWXy.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/WrWXy.png)

Country information. We don't know which level they took or whether they passed, but if the proportion does not vary very much, we can have an educated guess.

12099 people passed the HSK 6 test in year 2010 and 86.75% of the total examinees of HSK 6 are non-Chinese, so that's about 10 thousand people. Let us multiply that with 20 for all the years and that makes 200 thousand people globally. Africa only has 0.64% so that's about 1000 people. Oceania (0.77%) has only a few more than Africa. That's above 130, but maybe the source in the OP has a higher standard for Chinese proficiency, or people of Chinese origin has a higher chance of passing the test, so for such a rough estimation, I think the numbers are reasonable.

Other interesting statistics:
[![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/mLSIB.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/mLSIB.png)
American people are actually very good at listening!


---

