<p>Note that sometimes the transcription reflects the actual reading rather than the "single-character-pinyin".</p>

<p>For example, 你好 is sometimes transcribed as <strong>ní hăo</strong>, even if the "actual" transcription per-character would actually be <strong>nǐ hăo</strong>. This happens because when two third tones are next to each other, the first one becomes a second tone (when reading/pronouncing the characters, not when writing). </p>

<p>In other cases there is a totall loss of the tone, such as in 窗户 (window) transcribed — and read — as <strong>chuāng hu</strong><sup>1</sup>, rather than <strong>chuāng hù</strong>.</p>

<hr>

<p><sup>1: The source is the CEDICT dictionary.</sup></p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2011-12-15T16:29:54.347Z
Representing tone-changes triggered by neighboring tones is pretty consistent actually. I believe the standard is to write the underlying "original" tone. The discrepancies I'm referring to are not triggered by context; they are dialectal (I think.)
user103
CC BY-SA 3.0
2011-12-15T16:32:00.430Z
Can you provide some actual examples of such discrepancies you're referring to?
Alenanno
CC BY-SA 3.0
2011-12-15T17:17:59.000Z
The measure word 个 in èrshí gè nánrén or èrshí ge nánrén
上 as in zǎoshang or zǎoshàng
候 as in shénme shíhou or shénme shíhòu
边 as in shàngbian or shàngbiān
As you can see, it has something to do with optionally using a neutral tone in place of another tone.
user103
CC BY-SA 3.0
2011-12-15T18:01:02.383Z
I think it's the same phenomenon I described in the second part of my answer, where some characters lose their tones, and not just for a matter of transcription.
Alenanno
CC BY-SA 3.0
2011-12-15T15:51:20.590Z
2011-12-15T15:51:20.590Z
Alenanno
<p>When the tone that's written doesn't match what tone you'd expect to see that indicates that the transcription is meant to match the pronunciation. For example, the book <a href="http://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/0415700108" rel="nofollow">"Modern Chinese Grammar" by Claudia Ross and Jing-heng Sheng Ma</a> writes third tones as second tones when tone sandhi occurs. Other references do not necessarily do this.</p>

<p>What is more consistently done is omitting the tone mark when that syllable loses its tone in common use. Here, you will run into differences between regions; for example in Taiwan Mandarin speakers often keep the tone on a word's second syllable whereas in mainland China Mandarin speakers more often omit that tone.</p>

<p>Considering that the point of Pinyin is to show the pronunciation, it makes sense to leave off tones that are not pronounced. As for "standard pinyin spelling", looking up an individual character should give you its pronunciations with tone(s).</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2011-12-16T14:17:37.487Z
2011-12-16T14:17:37.487Z
Mr. Shiny and New 安宇
<p>I have noticed discrepancies in how native Mandarin speakers spell certain words in Pinyin reflecting differences in pronunciation, for instance, pángbiān vs. pángbian and zǎoshang vs. zǎoshàng. I've been told that these reflect differences across dialects. I even find these discrepancies across dictionaries, so I'm wondering if anyone knows of a source for standard Pinyin spellings.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2011-12-27T18:30:25.113Z
It is hard to standardize language. Wouldn't quoting a specific dictionary be reference enough? Just choose one of the bigger ones.
cburgmer
<pinyin>
Looking for Pinyin standards
# Looking for Pinyin standards

(Asked by: username_0 on 2011-12-15)

I have noticed discrepancies in how native Mandarin speakers spell certain words in Pinyin reflecting differences in pronunciation, for instance, pángbiān vs. pángbian and zǎoshang vs. zǎoshàng. I've been told that these reflect differences across dialects. I even find these discrepancies across dictionaries, so I'm wondering if anyone knows of a source for standard Pinyin spellings.

**Tags:** pinyin
> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: It is hard to standardize language. Wouldn't quoting a specific dictionary be reference enough? Just choose one of the bigger ones.  

---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_2 on 2011-12-15. Score: 1

Note that sometimes the transcription reflects the actual reading rather than the "single-character-pinyin".

For example, 你好 is sometimes transcribed as **ní hăo**, even if the "actual" transcription per-character would actually be **nǐ hăo**. This happens because when two third tones are next to each other, the first one becomes a second tone (when reading/pronouncing the characters, not when writing).

In other cases there is a totall loss of the tone, such as in 窗户 (window) transcribed — and read — as **chuāng hu**1, rather than **chuāng hù**.

---

1: The source is the CEDICT dictionary.

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: Representing tone-changes triggered by neighboring tones is pretty consistent actually. I believe the standard is to write the underlying "original" tone. The discrepancies I'm referring to are not triggered by context; they are dialectal (I think.)  
> **username_2**: Can you provide some actual examples of such discrepancies you're referring to?  
> **username_0**: The measure word 个 in èrshí gè nánrén or èrshí ge nánrén 上 as in zǎoshang or zǎoshàng 候 as in shénme shíhou or shénme shíhòu 边 as in shàngbian or shàngbiān As you can see, it has something to do with optionally using a neutral tone in place of another tone.  
> **username_2**: I think it's the same phenomenon I described in the second part of my answer, where some characters lose their tones, and not just for a matter of transcription.  

---

### Answer by username_3 on 2011-12-16. Score: 0

When the tone that's written doesn't match what tone you'd expect to see that indicates that the transcription is meant to match the pronunciation. For example, the book ["Modern Chinese Grammar" by Claudia Ross and Jing-heng Sheng Ma](http://rads.stackoverflow.com/amzn/click/0415700108) writes third tones as second tones when tone sandhi occurs. Other references do not necessarily do this.

What is more consistently done is omitting the tone mark when that syllable loses its tone in common use. Here, you will run into differences between regions; for example in Taiwan Mandarin speakers often keep the tone on a word's second syllable whereas in mainland China Mandarin speakers more often omit that tone.

Considering that the point of Pinyin is to show the pronunciation, it makes sense to leave off tones that are not pronounced. As for "standard pinyin spelling", looking up an individual character should give you its pronunciations with tone(s).


---

