<p>Yes. For Mandarin (Simplified Chinese):</p>

<p><a href="http://book.douban.com/subject/1082272/">The Contemporary Chinese Dictionary</a> (现代汉语词典): This one is for words and phrases. They have a version in both Chinese and English.</p>

<p><a href="http://book.douban.com/subject/1133158/">Xinhua Dictionary</a> (新华字典): this is for Chinese characters. Also available in both English and Chinese. </p>

<p>I'm not too familiar with traditional dictionaries. But 國語日報辭典 seems pretty popular from googling around. </p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-07-19T23:12:07.057Z
@Bathrobe 现代汉语词典 is sort of authoritative. To me, 溏鹅 isn't a proper Chinese word -- I have never seen it before -- pelican is called 鹈鹕 in Chinese.
user58955
CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-07-21T00:26:14.973Z
Yes, 鹈鹕 is standard, but 溏鹅 is also used, especially in Taiwan. Look up "塘鹅暗杀令" on Baidu. Yes, it's 'The Pelican Brief'. 现代汉语词典 has that kind of problem: too restrictive. Don't rely on it as an ironclad guide to the Chinese language. There's much more to the language than what's found in 现代汉语词典.
Bathrobe
CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-01-11T11:37:27.547Z
现代汉语词典 may be 'standard', but it has problems, being too northern in emphasis and still rather '50s plebeian style' in its usage judgments. I don't think it can really be relied on as a standard authoritative dictionary; its attempts to delimit usage can be and are regularly ignored. It's also too small. As a trivial example, it doesn't list 溏鹅 for pelican, but if you tried to insist that 溏鹅 isn't a proper Chinese word because it's not in 现代汉语词典, you'd really have your priorities mixed up.
Bathrobe
CC BY-SA 3.0
2011-12-13T21:37:34.283Z
2011-12-13T21:47:03.863Z
2011-12-13T21:47:03.863Z
Rachel Z
<p>Xinhua Dictionary is kind of a gold-standard for Chinese dictionaries, similar to the place Merriam-Webster holds in the English-speaking world.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2011-12-17T14:19:18.007Z
+1 @NullUserException.. i'd have to agree there
jsj
CC BY-SA 3.0
2011-12-21T19:23:29.443Z
haha, ok this is a chinese site. let's not get into an argument about British vs. American English...
weiy
CC BY-SA 3.0
2011-12-14T22:03:02.190Z
Merriam-Webster, eh? The [OED](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxford_English_Dictionary) is arguably the most respectable English dictionary out there. Because you know, it was written by the English.
Orion
CC BY-SA 3.0
2011-12-13T22:04:27.853Z
2011-12-13T22:04:27.853Z
weiy
<p>A per the topic, I think something like <strong>现代汉语规范词典编辑</strong> would be what you are looking for.</p>
<p>From 百度百科:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><strong>一、《现代汉语规范词典》中“规范”二字的含义√</strong></p>
<p>我们从不认为书名中没有“规范”二字的就都是不规范的词典，从不认为有“规范”二字的就都是规范的词典。本词典书名中的“规范”二字指的是体现国家通用语言文字法、国家语言文字方针政策的各项现行的语言文字规范标准，即本词典旨在努力全面严格地贯彻执行这些规范标准。这个含义在本词典的三份序言及前言中已经说明。</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Which basically says that they're trying to 'standardize' Mandarin.</p>
<p>There's a lot of footnotes throughout the dictionary which emphasize these changes. If you take a word like <code>确凿</code> for instance, a lot of Chinese people will pronounce this quèzuò, as this is what was taught in schools ten to twenty years ago, but since then the pronunciation of this word has been standardized: 《现代汉语规范词典》has it lised as quèzáo with a footnote saying 凿：不读“zuò”.</p>
<p>Apple also has 《现代汉语规范词典》available as, it's <em>only</em>, it's CH-CH dictionary on it's iDevices - next to Oxford's CH-ENG dictionary - if that means anything to you as standardization goes.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2014-07-19T15:27:05.107Z
2014-07-19T15:27:05.107Z
2020-06-17T09:50:11.587Z
Mou某
<blockquote>
  <p>Are there standard dictionaries for Chinese?</p>
</blockquote>

<p>If you are always online, please use the Chinese dictionary on line:
<a href="http://xh.5156edu.com/" rel="nofollow">http://xh.5156edu.com/</a></p>

<p>For more information about Chinese words, you can see "CiHai" （辞海）<a href="http://www.xiexingcun.com/cihai/" rel="nofollow">http://www.xiexingcun.com/cihai/</a>, this is a book similar to <em>Encyclopedia Britannica</em></p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2013-09-26T06:43:18.903Z
2013-09-26T06:43:18.903Z
xqMogvKW
<p>Standard dictionaries have had a profound effect on languages like English. They've helped normalize spelling and pronunciation and provide reference for meanings and disambiguation.</p>

<p>When thinking of English dictionaries, Oxford and Merriam-Webster immediately come to mind.</p>

<p><strong>Are there standard, popular dictionaries for Mandarin and Cantonese?</strong></p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-10-31T07:42:20.967Z
I was wondering why online dictionaries weren't mentioned in this question. Then I found they were hiding in http://chinese.stackexchange.com/a/1195/200
Golden Cuy
<books><reference-materials><dictionary><resources>
Are there standard dictionaries for Chinese?
# Are there standard dictionaries for Chinese?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2011-12-13)

Standard dictionaries have had a profound effect on languages like English. They've helped normalize spelling and pronunciation and provide reference for meanings and disambiguation.

When thinking of English dictionaries, Oxford and Merriam-Webster immediately come to mind.

**Are there standard, popular dictionaries for Mandarin and Cantonese?**

**Tags:** books, reference-materials, dictionary, resources
> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: I was wondering why online dictionaries weren't mentioned in this question. Then I found they were hiding in http://chinese.stackexchange.com/a/1195/200  

---

## 4 answers

### Answer by username_2 on 2011-12-13. Score: 14

Yes. For Mandarin (Simplified Chinese):

[The Contemporary Chinese Dictionary](http://book.douban.com/subject/1082272/) (现代汉语词典): This one is for words and phrases. They have a version in both Chinese and English.

[Xinhua Dictionary](http://book.douban.com/subject/1133158/) (新华字典): this is for Chinese characters. Also available in both English and Chinese.

I'm not too familiar with traditional dictionaries. But 國語日報辭典 seems pretty popular from googling around.

> **Comments:**
> **username_4**: 现代汉语词典 may be 'standard', but it has problems, being too northern in emphasis and still rather '50s plebeian style' in its usage judgments. I don't think it can really be relied on as a standard authoritative dictionary; its attempts to delimit usage can be and are regularly ignored. It's also too small. As a trivial example, it doesn't list 溏鹅 for pelican, but if you tried to insist that 溏鹅 isn't a proper Chinese word because it's not in 现代汉语词典, you'd really have your priorities mixed up.  
> **username_3**: @Bathrobe 现代汉语词典 is sort of authoritative. To me, 溏鹅 isn't a proper Chinese word -- I have never seen it before -- pelican is called 鹈鹕 in Chinese.  
> **username_4**: Yes, 鹈鹕 is standard, but 溏鹅 is also used, especially in Taiwan. Look up "塘鹅暗杀令" on Baidu. Yes, it's 'The Pelican Brief'. 现代汉语词典 has that kind of problem: too restrictive. Don't rely on it as an ironclad guide to the Chinese language. There's much more to the language than what's found in 现代汉语词典.  

---

### Answer by username_5 on 2011-12-13. Score: 5

Xinhua Dictionary is kind of a gold-standard for Chinese dictionaries, similar to the place Merriam-Webster holds in the English-speaking world.

> **Comments:**
> **username_7**: Merriam-Webster, eh? The [OED](http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxford_English_Dictionary) is arguably the most respectable English dictionary out there. Because you know, it was written by the English.  
> **username_6**: +1 @NullUserException.. i'd have to agree there  
> **username_5**: haha, ok this is a chinese site. let's not get into an argument about British vs. American English...  

---

### Answer by username_8 on 2014-07-19. Score: 1

A per the topic, I think something like **现代汉语规范词典编辑** would be what you are looking for.

From 百度百科:

> **一、《现代汉语规范词典》中“规范”二字的含义√**
>
> 我们从不认为书名中没有“规范”二字的就都是不规范的词典，从不认为有“规范”二字的就都是规范的词典。本词典书名中的“规范”二字指的是体现国家通用语言文字法、国家语言文字方针政策的各项现行的语言文字规范标准，即本词典旨在努力全面严格地贯彻执行这些规范标准。这个含义在本词典的三份序言及前言中已经说明。

Which basically says that they're trying to 'standardize' Mandarin.

There's a lot of footnotes throughout the dictionary which emphasize these changes. If you take a word like `确凿` for instance, a lot of Chinese people will pronounce this quèzuò, as this is what was taught in schools ten to twenty years ago, but since then the pronunciation of this word has been standardized: 《现代汉语规范词典》has it lised as quèzáo with a footnote saying 凿：不读“zuò”.

Apple also has 《现代汉语规范词典》available as, it's *only*, it's CH-CH dictionary on it's iDevices - next to Oxford's CH-ENG dictionary - if that means anything to you as standardization goes.


---

### Answer by username_9 on 2013-09-26. Score: 0

> Are there standard dictionaries for Chinese?

If you are always online, please use the Chinese dictionary on line:
<http://xh.5156edu.com/>

For more information about Chinese words, you can see "CiHai" （辞海）<http://www.xiexingcun.com/cihai/>, this is a book similar to *Encyclopedia Britannica*


---

