<p>I wouldn't take it as a special structure. I take 什么时候出现不好 or 他喜欢谁不好 as a normal rhetorical question, denoting <em><strong>positive meaning</strong></em>.  They means 什么时候出现都好 and 他喜欢谁都好.  好 is used as an adjective meaning <em><strong>fine, ok, good</strong></em>.  Grammatically, 什么时候出现 and 他喜欢谁 is  <em><strong>subject</strong></em>, and 不好 is <em><strong>predicate</strong></em>.</p>
<p>什么时候出现不好 means <em><strong>whenever it appears is fine</strong></em> and 他喜欢谁不好 <em><strong>whoever he likes is fine</strong></em>.</p>
<p>The rhetorical question 什么时候出现不好(compare to 什么时候出现都好) puts more emphasis which implies a <em>but</em>. The 'but' is often omitted as the examples you quoted.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>Can any &quot;question&quot; go in front of 不好? </p>
</blockquote>
<p>No, not all questions could go in front of it. It works well with <em><strong>selective</strong></em> questions. E. g. 去哪，什么时候，什么地方，什么人，谁, etc.  In those questions, you can select who, what time, where, etc.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-09-14T00:14:13.353Z
2020-09-14T00:14:13.353Z
dan
<p>什么时候出现不好，偏偏在这个时候出现<br>
Why not show up some other time, but this very moment.</p>
<p>他(她)喜欢谁不好，偏偏喜欢一个不懂得尊重她的男人<br>
Why doesn't she choose/like someone else, but a man who doesn't respect her.</p>
<p>Key words in this structure <code>...不好, 偏偏...</code>:</p>
<ol>
<li><code>什么</code> is NOT a question word, but means <code>any (other)</code>, so does <code>谁</code> in the 2nd example.</li>
<li><code>不好</code> means <code>why not</code>.</li>
<li><code>偏偏</code> means <code>unexpectedly</code>.</li>
</ol>
<hr />
<p>First, this type of sentences indicates a contrast condition, so &quot;<strong>but</strong>&quot;, &quot;<strong>in contrast</strong>&quot;, &quot;<strong>unexpectedly</strong>&quot; or even &quot;<strong>ironically</strong>&quot; can be added afterwards (as long as it is grammarly correct, if this is what you are pursuing).</p>
<p>And imho, this is also a very emotional sentence or subjective expression with a tone of grumbling or judging others behind. And <code>不好</code> sounds more like a <a href="https://resources.allsetlearning.com/chinese/grammar/Rhetorical_questions#Rhetorical_Question_with_.E4.B8.8D_or_.E6.B2.A1" rel="nofollow noreferrer">rhetorical question  </a>, like <code>吃苹果不好吗，偏偏要梨</code>， so the first example sometimes also goes like &quot;什么时候出现<strong>都好</strong>，偏偏在这个时候出现&quot;. Interesting?</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-09-13T23:49:03.543Z
2020-09-13T23:57:01.637Z
2020-09-13T23:57:01.637Z
Shaw
<p>什么 in this structure is not indicating question form, it is acting as a pronoun for  an indefinite object</p>
<p>'What' in &quot;eat what you want&quot; means 'whatever' --  not a specific thing</p>
<p>'when' in &quot;come when you want&quot; means &quot;whenever' -- not a specific time</p>
<blockquote>
<p>不好 means 'not good'; [XXXX不好] = [say not good to XXXX] = [not choose to XXXX]</p>
</blockquote>
<ul>
<li><p>什么时候出现<strong>不好</strong>，偏偏在这个时候出现 = <strong>not choose to</strong> appear in just any moment. It has to appear at this moment</p>
</li>
<li><p>他喜欢谁<strong>不好</strong>，偏偏喜欢一个不懂得尊重她的男人 = She <strong>doesn't choose to</strong> love just anyone. She has to love a man who doesn't respect her</p>
</li>
</ul>
<blockquote>
<p><em>Does it required a &quot;but&quot; clause afterward for contrast?</em></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Yes, it does</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-09-13T22:24:54.237Z
2020-09-13T22:24:54.237Z
Tang Ho
<p>This is a very good example:  Once you start using grammar to analyze an unusual sentence, arguments start and you get many different answers.  Tell me why care about grammar structure, especially using so many jargon to explain to your student?  Try my way:
&quot;什么时候出现&quot; 不好，偏偏 &quot;在这个时候出现&quot;。</p>
<p>1 contents inside quotation marks are replaceable.
2 不好 is sarcastic negative, implying positive, must be w--ever as covering all except:
3 偏偏 is sarcastic positive, implying negative, &quot;I don't approve this exception from 2.
Try make few sentences out of this pattern.</p>
<p>Above is exactly what I taught my students: Did I use any grammar term?  As long as they understand and most important of all, can imitate and use it, why get grammar involved?</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-09-14T09:51:34.710Z
Arguments start because an awful lot of answerers are 1. unaware of grammar; 2. provide unreferenced opinions; 3. don't provide enough examples to substantiate said opinion. Avoiding linguistics jargon is a respectable teaching choice (when it's not forced by some other factor...) but please don't decorate your answers with this many anti-grammar remarks. It looks like you're pushing an agenda. You can provide meaningful and effective answers, according to your style, while keeping a neutral tone.
blackgreen
CC BY-SA 4.0
2020-09-14T02:01:45.853Z
2020-09-14T02:01:45.853Z
James Liu 刘老师
<p>A few examples in a video about 偏偏 (time links to examples below) use a structure that seems to be &quot;[Question Word] + V + 不好&quot;. The meaning seems to be similar to structures like “想吃什么[就吃什么]&quot;. How does this structure work? Can any &quot;question&quot; go in front of 不好? Does it required a &quot;but&quot; clause afterward for contrast?</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="https://youtu.be/nDSfejkA6AA?t=173" rel="nofollow noreferrer">什么时候出现不好，偏偏在这个时候出现</a> &quot;He could've appear [sic] at any other time, but he chooses to appear at this (awkward) moment&quot;</li>
<li><a href="https://youtu.be/nDSfejkA6AA?t=236" rel="nofollow noreferrer">他喜欢谁不好，偏偏喜欢一个不懂得尊重她的男人</a> &quot;She can choose to like anyone else, but she chooses to like the one who doesn't respect her&quot;</li>
</ul>

<grammar><meaning>
Who/what/when + V + 不好 meaning "could V any time/thing/one"
# Who/what/when + V + 不好 meaning "could V any time/thing/one"

(Asked by: username_0 on 2020-09-13)

A few examples in a video about 偏偏 (time links to examples below) use a structure that seems to be "[Question Word] + V + 不好". The meaning seems to be similar to structures like “想吃什么[就吃什么]". How does this structure work? Can any "question" go in front of 不好? Does it required a "but" clause afterward for contrast?

* [什么时候出现不好，偏偏在这个时候出现](https://youtu.be/nDSfejkA6AA?t=173) "He could've appear [sic] at any other time, but he chooses to appear at this (awkward) moment"
* [他喜欢谁不好，偏偏喜欢一个不懂得尊重她的男人](https://youtu.be/nDSfejkA6AA?t=236) "She can choose to like anyone else, but she chooses to like the one who doesn't respect her"

**Tags:** grammar, meaning

---

## 4 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2020-09-14. Score: 1 | Accepted answer

I wouldn't take it as a special structure. I take 什么时候出现不好 or 他喜欢谁不好 as a normal rhetorical question, denoting ***positive meaning***. They means 什么时候出现都好 and 他喜欢谁都好. 好 is used as an adjective meaning ***fine, ok, good***. Grammatically, 什么时候出现 and 他喜欢谁 is ***subject***, and 不好 is ***predicate***.

什么时候出现不好 means ***whenever it appears is fine*** and 他喜欢谁不好 ***whoever he likes is fine***.

The rhetorical question 什么时候出现不好(compare to 什么时候出现都好) puts more emphasis which implies a *but*. The 'but' is often omitted as the examples you quoted.

> Can any "question" go in front of 不好?

No, not all questions could go in front of it. It works well with ***selective*** questions. E. g. 去哪，什么时候，什么地方，什么人，谁, etc. In those questions, you can select who, what time, where, etc.


---

### Answer by username_2 on 2020-09-13. Score: 1

什么时候出现不好，偏偏在这个时候出现  
Why not show up some other time, but this very moment.

他(她)喜欢谁不好，偏偏喜欢一个不懂得尊重她的男人  
Why doesn't she choose/like someone else, but a man who doesn't respect her.

Key words in this structure `...不好, 偏偏...`:

1. `什么` is NOT a question word, but means `any (other)`, so does `谁` in the 2nd example.
2. `不好` means `why not`.
3. `偏偏` means `unexpectedly`.

---

First, this type of sentences indicates a contrast condition, so "**but**", "**in contrast**", "**unexpectedly**" or even "**ironically**" can be added afterwards (as long as it is grammarly correct, if this is what you are pursuing).

And imho, this is also a very emotional sentence or subjective expression with a tone of grumbling or judging others behind. And `不好` sounds more like a [rhetorical question](https://resources.allsetlearning.com/chinese/grammar/Rhetorical_questions#Rhetorical_Question_with_.E4.B8.8D_or_.E6.B2.A1) , like `吃苹果不好吗，偏偏要梨`， so the first example sometimes also goes like "什么时候出现**都好**，偏偏在这个时候出现". Interesting?


---

### Answer by username_3 on 2020-09-13. Score: 0

什么 in this structure is not indicating question form, it is acting as a pronoun for an indefinite object

'What' in "eat what you want" means 'whatever' -- not a specific thing

'when' in "come when you want" means "whenever' -- not a specific time

> 不好 means 'not good'; [XXXX不好] = [say not good to XXXX] = [not choose to XXXX]

* 什么时候出现**不好**，偏偏在这个时候出现 = **not choose to** appear in just any moment. It has to appear at this moment
* 他喜欢谁**不好**，偏偏喜欢一个不懂得尊重她的男人 = She **doesn't choose to** love just anyone. She has to love a man who doesn't respect her

> *Does it required a "but" clause afterward for contrast?*

Yes, it does


---

### Answer by username_4 on 2020-09-14. Score: 0

This is a very good example: Once you start using grammar to analyze an unusual sentence, arguments start and you get many different answers. Tell me why care about grammar structure, especially using so many jargon to explain to your student? Try my way:
"什么时候出现" 不好，偏偏 "在这个时候出现"。

1 contents inside quotation marks are replaceable.
2 不好 is sarcastic negative, implying positive, must be w--ever as covering all except:
3 偏偏 is sarcastic positive, implying negative, "I don't approve this exception from 2.
Try make few sentences out of this pattern.

Above is exactly what I taught my students: Did I use any grammar term? As long as they understand and most important of all, can imitate and use it, why get grammar involved?

> **Comments:**
> **username_5**: Arguments start because an awful lot of answerers are 1. unaware of grammar; 2. provide unreferenced opinions; 3. don't provide enough examples to substantiate said opinion. Avoiding linguistics jargon is a respectable teaching choice (when it's not forced by some other factor...) but please don't decorate your answers with this many anti-grammar remarks. It looks like you're pushing an agenda. You can provide meaningful and effective answers, according to your style, while keeping a neutral tone.  

---

