<p>Only textbooks, texts published by government and other formal texts, e.g. Company name registered <strong>are forced to be in SC</strong>.  In other circumstance, TC or SC are just an economical problem.</p>

<p>For example, if you wrote a book, if you can make the publisher believe the TC edition will be sold more than SC, then you can publish the TC edition.</p>

<p>They are converted to SC, do not mean the TC edition will be deprecated, the TC edition could be still get published, if the publisher believe they could be sold out. </p>

<p>There are many people like to read classical texts in traditional.</p>

<p>Here is the fist page of amazon.cn when you search '繁体版'(traditional edition), </p>

<p>The first is Daoist, the 3rd is Chuang Tzu, they are all traditional and vertical. </p>

<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/ew7Sk.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/ew7Sk.png" alt="enter image description here"></a></p>

<p>If you can not find it in store, you can find it in libraries.</p>

<p>When you in school, you will study the <strong>SC</strong> edition.
And allmost all young people <strong>can read TC</strong>, because you will meet TC texts in TV, games, books, everywhere in your life.</p>

<p>So don't worry this problem.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-07-23T04:39:50.193Z
Please let me just confirm something - So, in Mainland China, the classic texts are still studied in school using traditional characters? Barry has written below that in textbooks they are written in simplified characters. Thanks a lot!
YI-78
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-07-24T09:30:36.290Z
@YI-78, Sorry, My typo. In school, only simplified.
sfy
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-07-18T11:43:07.610Z
2017-07-24T09:27:10.310Z
2017-07-24T09:27:10.310Z
sfy
<p>I would like to answer your questions one by one at first, but I decide to give you a comprehensive answer here. I'll take Buddhism for example. Daoism and Confucianism (NOT a religion) are similar.<br>
Buddhism are still publishing books in Traditional Chinese (TC). In fact, you can find both Traditional Chinese and Simplified Chinese (SC) versions of books existing in China. It is a widespread opinion that reading books in TC will be more beneficial than Simplified Chinese (SC), since TC is the script used back to the foundation of the two religions. Similarly, if someone believes Tibetan Buddhism, many lamas will require him to chant in Tibetan language. Such phenomenon is still common.<br>
However, most experienced and renowned religious leaders (such as Master Jingkong and Dzongsar Rinpoche) are against such unnecessary restriction. Their opinions are: Since most Chinese now are taught SC, and religions should benefit as many people as possible, it's best to publish books and scriptures in SC, the most popular script in China. It should also be allowed to chant in Chinese language instead of Tibetan or Sanskrit, as it will make no difference except that Chinese people will find chanting much easier.<br>
Traditional Chinese script is not taught in today's schools and universities in China, except for Chinese language major. However, it's not a big problem for the majority of Chinese to read TC due to the influence of Taiwan and Hong Kong(but most of them can't write it). For classical Chinese texts, they are still taught from primary school through high school, but they are all written in SC.<br>
For Buddhism classics in Simplified Chinese, please visit:<br>
<a href="http://www.fodian.net/index1.htm" rel="nofollow noreferrer">http://www.fodian.net/index1.htm</a><br>
This website cooperates with CBETA in Taiwan, which publishes corrected version of Buddhism classics.<br>
You can leave a comment below if you have any remaining questions. Don't forget to give me an upvote or accept this answer if you find it useful. </p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-06-14T07:49:21.283Z
2017-06-14T07:49:21.283Z
Winfred Huang
<blockquote>
  <p>are classic texts still teached in schools the same way they were before? </p>
</blockquote>

<p>classical texts are still taught in schools nowadays. well, "before", you mean last century, "before 1911", or hundreds / thousands of years ago?</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>do they use traditional characters at all?</p>
</blockquote>

<p>clearly, using traditional script in macau, hongkong &amp; taiwan.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>what kind of projects are there to preserve these texts</p>
</blockquote>

<p>a few websites have classical texts "collected", in <strong>traditional chinese</strong> such as:</p>

<p><a href="http://tripitaka.cbeta.org" rel="nofollow noreferrer">漢文大藏經</a></p>

<p>i'm not sure if this one is a "complete" buddhism text collection, well, it should be the largest.</p>

<p><a href="https://www.kanripo.org" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Kanseki Repository</a></p>

<p>currently, it's the best sources for classical text, it included <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siku_Quanshu" rel="nofollow noreferrer"> 四庫全書</a> and more. further, it put buddhism texts &amp; taoism texts into separate categories; ought to be easier to find.</p>

<p><a href="https://archive.org" rel="nofollow noreferrer">internet archive</a></p>

<p>this one had the cadal (china-america digital academic library), which had 78K+ books in classical text. unfortunately, the "books provider" made many unforgivable errors, that the meta-data for these books are, far from perfect :(</p>

<p>btw, it was blocked in "that area" now. c'est la vie :(</p>

<p>second to last, as i know, the simplified chinese should be used for modern text only; all texts from the past (literatures of yore) should be use traditional chinese characters.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>buddhism to propagate once again</p>
</blockquote>

<p>are you kidding? or, a evil cult (邪教), pretending it's buddhism?</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-06-14T03:49:11.210Z
I think you maybe misread my question, since I'm asking specifically about these texts in simplified Chinese. I mean to ask about the efforts made to convert this material to simplified Chinese, **not** how they're being preserved in the original script. I edited the original question a little to make it clearer.

About Buddhism, check out news for Xi Jinping meeting with Venerable Master Hsing Yun, from Fo Guang Shan, for example. Fo Guang Shan is a real buddhist order which was even allowed to rebuild their ancestral temple in China.
YI-78
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-06-14T07:31:26.687Z
in textbooks, classics are written in simplified Chinese. But publications in traditional Chinese are also accessible.
Gestaltfilter
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-06-14T01:56:02.043Z
2017-06-14T01:56:02.043Z
水巷孑蠻
<p>Whenever something is newly published, it is usually in Simplified. That's probably just it. If something is in Traditional because it was made / written before Simplified was popularized, well the copies, if they exist, are just kept.</p>

<p>If this is what you are wondering: it is not hard at all to convert Traditional to Simplified, especially for a human. If people want to publish something now, they typically type. Now, how do they type? They look at the original and essentially digitalize it. It is just that they probably usually just type in Simplified because that is how they have their input method configured. Thus a text body in Traditional is digitalized in Simplified seamlessly.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-06-16T18:44:53.180Z
2017-06-16T18:44:53.180Z
Rethliopuks
<p>In the past I've came across a few websites that distribute Buddhist texts in simplified Chinese, which is somewhat unsurprising since there's active interest in Buddhism to propagate once again in China. I'm not aware of a full canon in simplified Chinese, but I know there are many texts already converted so simplified.</p>

<p>But what about other formative texts in Chinese culture, such as Daoist and Confucianist? Or even Buddhist canons, since I'm not aware of one that was completely converted to simplified Chinese.</p>

<p>What kind of projects are there to preserve these texts in the modern script? Published books, websites..? Either by the government or private companies.</p>

<p>Are classic texts still teached in schools the same way they were before the introduction of today's simplified characters and the cultural revolution? Do they use traditional characters at all? How does one go about studying the classics nowadays?</p>

<p>Thanks!</p>

<classical-chinese><traditional-vs-simplified>
What's the state of Chinese classical texts in the mainland after Simplified Chinese (and the Cultural Revolution)?
# What's the state of Chinese classical texts in the mainland after Simplified Chinese (and the Cultural Revolution)?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2017-06-13)

In the past I've came across a few websites that distribute Buddhist texts in simplified Chinese, which is somewhat unsurprising since there's active interest in Buddhism to propagate once again in China. I'm not aware of a full canon in simplified Chinese, but I know there are many texts already converted so simplified.

But what about other formative texts in Chinese culture, such as Daoist and Confucianist? Or even Buddhist canons, since I'm not aware of one that was completely converted to simplified Chinese.

What kind of projects are there to preserve these texts in the modern script? Published books, websites..? Either by the government or private companies.

Are classic texts still teached in schools the same way they were before the introduction of today's simplified characters and the cultural revolution? Do they use traditional characters at all? How does one go about studying the classics nowadays?

Thanks!

**Tags:** classical-chinese, traditional-vs-simplified

---

## 4 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2017-07-18. Score: 1 | Accepted answer

Only textbooks, texts published by government and other formal texts, e.g. Company name registered **are forced to be in SC**. In other circumstance, TC or SC are just an economical problem.

For example, if you wrote a book, if you can make the publisher believe the TC edition will be sold more than SC, then you can publish the TC edition.

They are converted to SC, do not mean the TC edition will be deprecated, the TC edition could be still get published, if the publisher believe they could be sold out.

There are many people like to read classical texts in traditional.

Here is the fist page of amazon.cn when you search '繁体版'(traditional edition),

The first is Daoist, the 3rd is Chuang Tzu, they are all traditional and vertical.

[![enter image description here](https://i.sstatic.net/ew7Sk.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/ew7Sk.png)

If you can not find it in store, you can find it in libraries.

When you in school, you will study the **SC** edition.
And allmost all young people **can read TC**, because you will meet TC texts in TV, games, books, everywhere in your life.

So don't worry this problem.

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: Please let me just confirm something - So, in Mainland China, the classic texts are still studied in school using traditional characters? Barry has written below that in textbooks they are written in simplified characters. Thanks a lot!  
> **username_1**: @YI-78, Sorry, My typo. In school, only simplified.  

---

### Answer by username_2 on 2017-06-14. Score: 1

I would like to answer your questions one by one at first, but I decide to give you a comprehensive answer here. I'll take Buddhism for example. Daoism and Confucianism (NOT a religion) are similar.  
Buddhism are still publishing books in Traditional Chinese (TC). In fact, you can find both Traditional Chinese and Simplified Chinese (SC) versions of books existing in China. It is a widespread opinion that reading books in TC will be more beneficial than Simplified Chinese (SC), since TC is the script used back to the foundation of the two religions. Similarly, if someone believes Tibetan Buddhism, many lamas will require him to chant in Tibetan language. Such phenomenon is still common.  
However, most experienced and renowned religious leaders (such as Master Jingkong and Dzongsar Rinpoche) are against such unnecessary restriction. Their opinions are: Since most Chinese now are taught SC, and religions should benefit as many people as possible, it's best to publish books and scriptures in SC, the most popular script in China. It should also be allowed to chant in Chinese language instead of Tibetan or Sanskrit, as it will make no difference except that Chinese people will find chanting much easier.  
Traditional Chinese script is not taught in today's schools and universities in China, except for Chinese language major. However, it's not a big problem for the majority of Chinese to read TC due to the influence of Taiwan and Hong Kong(but most of them can't write it). For classical Chinese texts, they are still taught from primary school through high school, but they are all written in SC.  
For Buddhism classics in Simplified Chinese, please visit:  
<http://www.fodian.net/index1.htm>  
This website cooperates with CBETA in Taiwan, which publishes corrected version of Buddhism classics.  
You can leave a comment below if you have any remaining questions. Don't forget to give me an upvote or accept this answer if you find it useful.


---

### Answer by username_3 on 2017-06-14. Score: 0

> are classic texts still teached in schools the same way they were before?

classical texts are still taught in schools nowadays. well, "before", you mean last century, "before 1911", or hundreds / thousands of years ago?

> do they use traditional characters at all?

clearly, using traditional script in macau, hongkong & taiwan.

> what kind of projects are there to preserve these texts

a few websites have classical texts "collected", in **traditional chinese** such as:

[漢文大藏經](http://tripitaka.cbeta.org)

i'm not sure if this one is a "complete" buddhism text collection, well, it should be the largest.

[Kanseki Repository](https://www.kanripo.org)

currently, it's the best sources for classical text, it included  [四庫全書](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siku_Quanshu) and more. further, it put buddhism texts & taoism texts into separate categories; ought to be easier to find.

[internet archive](https://archive.org)

this one had the cadal (china-america digital academic library), which had 78K+ books in classical text. unfortunately, the "books provider" made many unforgivable errors, that the meta-data for these books are, far from perfect :(

btw, it was blocked in "that area" now. c'est la vie :(

second to last, as i know, the simplified chinese should be used for modern text only; all texts from the past (literatures of yore) should be use traditional chinese characters.

> buddhism to propagate once again

are you kidding? or, a evil cult (邪教), pretending it's buddhism?

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: I think you maybe misread my question, since I'm asking specifically about these texts in simplified Chinese. I mean to ask about the efforts made to convert this material to simplified Chinese, **not** how they're being preserved in the original script. I edited the original question a little to make it clearer.  About Buddhism, check out news for Xi Jinping meeting with Venerable Master Hsing Yun, from Fo Guang Shan, for example. Fo Guang Shan is a real buddhist order which was even allowed to rebuild their ancestral temple in China.  
> **username_4**: in textbooks, classics are written in simplified Chinese. But publications in traditional Chinese are also accessible.  

---

### Answer by username_5 on 2017-06-16. Score: 0

Whenever something is newly published, it is usually in Simplified. That's probably just it. If something is in Traditional because it was made / written before Simplified was popularized, well the copies, if they exist, are just kept.

If this is what you are wondering: it is not hard at all to convert Traditional to Simplified, especially for a human. If people want to publish something now, they typically type. Now, how do they type? They look at the original and essentially digitalize it. It is just that they probably usually just type in Simplified because that is how they have their input method configured. Thus a text body in Traditional is digitalized in Simplified seamlessly.


---

