<p>Most Chinese can read the both. The reason is that only a small portion of hanzi are different between traditional and simplified Chinese. (in other words, only a small portion is simplified from traditional version to simplified version.) Most hanzi are the same.</p>

<p>In mainland Chinese, you still can see traditional hanzi everywhere like plaques, posters, chess, academic philological periodicals. In Taiwan or Hong Kong, people also use some simplified ones in handwriting.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2013-01-16T14:40:49.543Z
2020-06-08T13:12:18.067Z
2020-06-08T13:12:18.067Z
Wei Huang
<p>You are correct. Most people read simplified with the exception of Taiwan and HK (although, they can read it too).</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-12-12T16:07:54.457Z
2012-12-12T16:07:54.457Z
user3871
<p>More people can read simplified than traditional, by a significant margin. There are roughly 1.3 billion people mainland China where simplified has been the standard since the 50s and 60s. Taiwan and Hong Kong, the three places traditional is the standard, total about 32 million between them (23 million in the Taiwan/ROC, 7 million in Hong Kong, 2 million in Macau). There are a lot of people from mainland China and Chinese outside of countries where Chinese in the primary language who can also read traditional, but I have no clue on the numbers.</p>

<p>Most people can get by more or less when reading the other character set because there are a lot of very standard substitutions. It is however easier to read simplified if you only know traditional.</p>

<p>Example substitutions (some standard ones):<br>
妈 马 语 诚 给 纽 约<br>
媽 馬 語 誠 給 紐 約<br>
(and some random ones):<br>
龟 龙<br>
龜 龍</p>

<p>Tools to convert between the two are readily available, although, as Ironfrost points out, these tools have a lot of problems with some of the 1:many conversion choices. Look at his comments below.</p>

<p><a href="http://translate.google.com/#zh-CN/zh-TW/" rel="nofollow">http://translate.google.com/#zh-CN/zh-TW/</a></p>

<p><a href="http://translate.google.com/#zh-TW/zh-CH/" rel="nofollow">http://translate.google.com/#zh-TW/zh-CH/</a></p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2013-01-09T07:00:27.827Z
I strongly disagree with the last paragraph of this answer. It's common for 2 or more Traditional characters to have merged into only one Simplified character, so automatic conversions from Simplified to Traditional are usually full of errors. Traditional-to-Simplified is generally better, because there are only a handful of characters with multiple simplified forms for one traditional form, but still not 100% perfect.
Ironfrost
CC BY-SA 3.0
2013-01-09T07:00:57.527Z
[...continued] The converter you linked to is particularly bad, because it doesn't take context into account at all. For example, 麵 (miàn: flour) and 面 (miàn: face) are separate characters in Traditional Chinese, but both written as 面 in Simplified. That converter always outputs 面, even if the character is part of a word like 面包 (miànbāo: bread) where the correct traditional form is 麵.
Ironfrost
CC BY-SA 3.0
2013-01-09T07:02:00.427Z
[...continued] There are better converters like Google Translate or the one on Chinese Wikipedia that try to guess the right character based on context, but even they still often make mistakes. I wouldn't advise using them to translate a product you're charging money for.
Ironfrost
CC BY-SA 3.0
2013-01-09T21:50:51.330Z
Answer improved by edit. Still recommend changing the link for the converter though.
Stumpy Joe Pete
CC BY-SA 3.0
2013-01-10T16:07:04.890Z
@StumpyJoePete, I haven't had time to do research on alternative services. If you have a good link, I'd be happy to throw that up, otherwise I'll try to do that this weekend.
juckele
CC BY-SA 3.0
2013-01-11T09:06:05.033Z
Add Macao (2 million) to the Traditional list :-) Plus a big share of the Chinese diaspora in South-East Asia and the West (with the notable -- but not very significant population-wise -- of Singapore).
dda
CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-12-12T17:29:00.100Z
2013-01-11T15:27:28.080Z
2013-01-11T15:27:28.080Z
juckele
<p>I'm trying to decide whether it would be better to use traditional or simplified characters for an iPhone game I'm making. If something is written in traditional, how many people will be able to read it? If something is written in simplified, how many people will be able to read it? From my research it seems most people can read simplified.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2012-12-14T16:35:31.013Z
yay for editing
Stumpy Joe Pete
<characters><traditional-vs-simplified>
What are the relative literacy rates in for simplified and traditional characters?
# What are the relative literacy rates in for simplified and traditional characters?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2012-12-12)

I'm trying to decide whether it would be better to use traditional or simplified characters for an iPhone game I'm making. If something is written in traditional, how many people will be able to read it? If something is written in simplified, how many people will be able to read it? From my research it seems most people can read simplified.

**Tags:** characters, traditional-vs-simplified
> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: yay for editing  

---

## 3 answers

### Answer by username_4 on 2012-12-12. Score: 5 | Accepted answer

More people can read simplified than traditional, by a significant margin. There are roughly 1.3 billion people mainland China where simplified has been the standard since the 50s and 60s. Taiwan and Hong Kong, the three places traditional is the standard, total about 32 million between them (23 million in the Taiwan/ROC, 7 million in Hong Kong, 2 million in Macau). There are a lot of people from mainland China and Chinese outside of countries where Chinese in the primary language who can also read traditional, but I have no clue on the numbers.

Most people can get by more or less when reading the other character set because there are a lot of very standard substitutions. It is however easier to read simplified if you only know traditional.

Example substitutions (some standard ones):  
妈 马 语 诚 给 纽 约  
媽 馬 語 誠 給 紐 約  
(and some random ones):  
龟 龙  
龜 龍

Tools to convert between the two are readily available, although, as Ironfrost points out, these tools have a lot of problems with some of the 1:many conversion choices. Look at his comments below.

<http://translate.google.com/#zh-CN/zh-TW/>

<http://translate.google.com/#zh-TW/zh-CH/>

> **Comments:**
> **username_5**: I strongly disagree with the last paragraph of this answer. It's common for 2 or more Traditional characters to have merged into only one Simplified character, so automatic conversions from Simplified to Traditional are usually full of errors. Traditional-to-Simplified is generally better, because there are only a handful of characters with multiple simplified forms for one traditional form, but still not 100% perfect.  
> **username_5**: [...continued] The converter you linked to is particularly bad, because it doesn't take context into account at all. For example, 麵 (miàn: flour) and 面 (miàn: face) are separate characters in Traditional Chinese, but both written as 面 in Simplified. That converter always outputs 面, even if the character is part of a word like 面包 (miànbāo: bread) where the correct traditional form is 麵.  
> **username_5**: [...continued] There are better converters like Google Translate or the one on Chinese Wikipedia that try to guess the right character based on context, but even they still often make mistakes. I wouldn't advise using them to translate a product you're charging money for.  
> **username_1**: Answer improved by edit. Still recommend changing the link for the converter though.  
> **username_4**: @StumpyJoePete, I haven't had time to do research on alternative services. If you have a good link, I'd be happy to throw that up, otherwise I'll try to do that this weekend.  
> **username_6**: Add Macao (2 million) to the Traditional list :-) Plus a big share of the Chinese diaspora in South-East Asia and the West (with the notable -- but not very significant population-wise -- of Singapore).  

---

### Answer by username_2 on 2013-01-16. Score: 4

Most Chinese can read the both. The reason is that only a small portion of hanzi are different between traditional and simplified Chinese. (in other words, only a small portion is simplified from traditional version to simplified version.) Most hanzi are the same.

In mainland Chinese, you still can see traditional hanzi everywhere like plaques, posters, chess, academic philological periodicals. In Taiwan or Hong Kong, people also use some simplified ones in handwriting.


---

### Answer by username_3 on 2012-12-12. Score: 3

You are correct. Most people read simplified with the exception of Taiwan and HK (although, they can read it too).


---

