<p>There are some Chinese characters that are called "象形字"， meaning that each of them representing a vivid picture, like "月（moon）"， “日（sun）”，“龟（tortoise )”, "马（horse）"， “鸟（bird）。”</p>

<p>There are some Chinese characters that are called “指事字” and "会意字". They are somehow like what you had in mind by "each character represents an idea". Examples of "指事字"  are "一（one）"， “二（two）”， “三（three）” “上（up）”， “下（down）”. An examples of "会意字" is “采（pick）”  that is a claw over a tree (木).</p>

<p>But the above mentioned characters only constitutes a small portion of Chinese character set.  </p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-12-17T03:54:04.823Z
2018-12-17T04:10:20.973Z
2018-12-17T04:10:20.973Z
John Z. Li
<blockquote>
  <p>Is there is an accurate, brief characterisation of the language?</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Considering it had developed over such a long period of time, it would be a trade-off between these two. The shortest, yet acceptable answer I can give is:</p>

<p>Written Chinese characters started with both pictorial and ideographic ones, but has grown more complex over history: Sometimes two characters that had the same sound would get confused and become the same character. Sometimes new characters are made combining the sound from one and meaning of another. Loanwords from sounds also exist throughout history. But the sounds also changed throughout history.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2018-04-19T13:23:10.683Z
2018-04-19T13:23:10.683Z
Zuoanqh
<p>According to this article: 
<a href="https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/19929343" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/19929343</a></p>

<p>Chinese writing should be categorized as <strong>"morphosyllabic"</strong> or <strong>"logosyllabic"</strong>,「语素音节文字」或意译作「意音文字」</p>

<p><strong>文字类型（Types of Writing Systems）</strong></p>

<p><strong>非文字（non-writing</strong>）</p>

<ul>
<li><p>表意图（ideogram）</p></li>
<li><p>象形图（pictogram）</p></li>
</ul>

<p><strong>文字（writing system）</strong></p>

<ul>
<li><p>表音文字（phonogram）</p></li>
<li><p>音节文字（syllabary）/ 音拍文字（moraic writing）</p></li>
<li><p>音位文字（phonemic writing）[1]</p></li>
<li><p>辅音文字（abjad）</p></li>
<li><p>元音附标文字（abugida）</p></li>
<li><p>全音位文字（alphabet）</p></li>
<li><p>语素文字（morphogram）</p></li>
<li><p>语素音节文字（morphosyllabary）/ 语素音拍文字（morphomoraic writing）</p></li>
</ul>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-12-18T05:36:59.587Z
2018-12-18T05:42:29.193Z
2018-12-18T05:42:29.193Z
sfy
<p>Chinese writing - that of Mandarin - does not seem anything like picture language as that is represented by Egyptian hieroglyphs. Nor does it seem ideographic in the sense that each character represents an idea. Is there is an accurate, brief characterisation of the language ? Perhaps there is not. I ask my question from a position of, as you will have realised, very considerable ignorance. But I would appreciate any guidance. </p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2018-01-01T10:58:01.017Z
See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_character_classification for a brief overview. It is simplistic but gets you there for the majority of characters.
dROOOze
CC BY-SA 3.0
2018-01-01T21:13:30.443Z
John DeFrancis debunked the "ideographic myth" in his book [The Chinese Language: Fact and Fantasy](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Chinese_Language:_Fact_and_Fantasy). Highly recommended reading!
Tsundoku
CC BY-SA 3.0
2018-01-02T15:38:54.303Z
About half of the significant ideas presented in that book are quite inaccurate, especially with regards to his extreme overestimation of the proportion of characters with phonetic elements (more accurate estimations have been given by up-to-date research on Chinese paleography), the rather controversial idea that written ideas cannot be separated from spoken language (obvious counterexamples would be mathematical equations, or road signs depicting hazardous situations), and that the writing system is harmful to literacy (no empirical evidence of this at all).
dROOOze
<traditional-characters>
Is Chinese writing pictorial, ideographic - or neither?
# Is Chinese writing pictorial, ideographic - or neither?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2018-01-01)

Chinese writing - that of Mandarin - does not seem anything like picture language as that is represented by Egyptian hieroglyphs. Nor does it seem ideographic in the sense that each character represents an idea. Is there is an accurate, brief characterisation of the language ? Perhaps there is not. I ask my question from a position of, as you will have realised, very considerable ignorance. But I would appreciate any guidance.

**Tags:** traditional-characters
> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chinese_character_classification for a brief overview. It is simplistic but gets you there for the majority of characters.  
> **username_2**: John DeFrancis debunked the "ideographic myth" in his book [The Chinese Language: Fact and Fantasy](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Chinese_Language:_Fact_and_Fantasy). Highly recommended reading!  
> **username_1**: About half of the significant ideas presented in that book are quite inaccurate, especially with regards to his extreme overestimation of the proportion of characters with phonetic elements (more accurate estimations have been given by up-to-date research on Chinese paleography), the rather controversial idea that written ideas cannot be separated from spoken language (obvious counterexamples would be mathematical equations, or road signs depicting hazardous situations), and that the writing system is harmful to literacy (no empirical evidence of this at all).  

---

## 3 answers

### Answer by username_3 on 2018-12-17. Score: 1

There are some Chinese characters that are called "象形字"， meaning that each of them representing a vivid picture, like "月（moon）"， “日（sun）”，“龟（tortoise )”, "马（horse）"， “鸟（bird）。”

There are some Chinese characters that are called “指事字” and "会意字". They are somehow like what you had in mind by "each character represents an idea". Examples of "指事字" are "一（one）"， “二（two）”， “三（three）” “上（up）”， “下（down）”. An examples of "会意字" is “采（pick）” that is a claw over a tree (木).

But the above mentioned characters only constitutes a small portion of Chinese character set.


---

### Answer by username_4 on 2018-04-19. Score: 1

> Is there is an accurate, brief characterisation of the language?

Considering it had developed over such a long period of time, it would be a trade-off between these two. The shortest, yet acceptable answer I can give is:

Written Chinese characters started with both pictorial and ideographic ones, but has grown more complex over history: Sometimes two characters that had the same sound would get confused and become the same character. Sometimes new characters are made combining the sound from one and meaning of another. Loanwords from sounds also exist throughout history. But the sounds also changed throughout history.


---

### Answer by username_5 on 2018-12-18. Score: 0

According to this article:
<https://zhuanlan.zhihu.com/p/19929343>

Chinese writing should be categorized as **"morphosyllabic"** or **"logosyllabic"**,「语素音节文字」或意译作「意音文字」

**文字类型（Types of Writing Systems）**

**非文字（non-writing**）

* 表意图（ideogram）
* 象形图（pictogram）

**文字（writing system）**

* 表音文字（phonogram）
* 音节文字（syllabary）/ 音拍文字（moraic writing）
* 音位文字（phonemic writing）[1]
* 辅音文字（abjad）
* 元音附标文字（abugida）
* 全音位文字（alphabet）
* 语素文字（morphogram）
* 语素音节文字（morphosyllabary）/ 语素音拍文字（morphomoraic writing）


---

