Create winequality.names
Browse files- winequality.names +72 -0
winequality.names
ADDED
@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
+
Citation Request:
|
2 |
+
This dataset is public available for research. The details are described in [Cortez et al., 2009].
|
3 |
+
Please include this citation if you plan to use this database:
|
4 |
+
|
5 |
+
P. Cortez, A. Cerdeira, F. Almeida, T. Matos and J. Reis.
|
6 |
+
Modeling wine preferences by data mining from physicochemical properties.
|
7 |
+
In Decision Support Systems, Elsevier, 47(4):547-553. ISSN: 0167-9236.
|
8 |
+
|
9 |
+
Available at: [@Elsevier] http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2009.05.016
|
10 |
+
[Pre-press (pdf)] http://www3.dsi.uminho.pt/pcortez/winequality09.pdf
|
11 |
+
[bib] http://www3.dsi.uminho.pt/pcortez/dss09.bib
|
12 |
+
|
13 |
+
1. Title: Wine Quality
|
14 |
+
|
15 |
+
2. Sources
|
16 |
+
Created by: Paulo Cortez (Univ. Minho), Antonio Cerdeira, Fernando Almeida, Telmo Matos and Jose Reis (CVRVV) @ 2009
|
17 |
+
|
18 |
+
3. Past Usage:
|
19 |
+
|
20 |
+
P. Cortez, A. Cerdeira, F. Almeida, T. Matos and J. Reis.
|
21 |
+
Modeling wine preferences by data mining from physicochemical properties.
|
22 |
+
In Decision Support Systems, Elsevier, 47(4):547-553. ISSN: 0167-9236.
|
23 |
+
|
24 |
+
In the above reference, two datasets were created, using red and white wine samples.
|
25 |
+
The inputs include objective tests (e.g. PH values) and the output is based on sensory data
|
26 |
+
(median of at least 3 evaluations made by wine experts). Each expert graded the wine quality
|
27 |
+
between 0 (very bad) and 10 (very excellent). Several data mining methods were applied to model
|
28 |
+
these datasets under a regression approach. The support vector machine model achieved the
|
29 |
+
best results. Several metrics were computed: MAD, confusion matrix for a fixed error tolerance (T),
|
30 |
+
etc. Also, we plot the relative importances of the input variables (as measured by a sensitivity
|
31 |
+
analysis procedure).
|
32 |
+
|
33 |
+
4. Relevant Information:
|
34 |
+
|
35 |
+
The two datasets are related to red and white variants of the Portuguese "Vinho Verde" wine.
|
36 |
+
For more details, consult: http://www.vinhoverde.pt/en/ or the reference [Cortez et al., 2009].
|
37 |
+
Due to privacy and logistic issues, only physicochemical (inputs) and sensory (the output) variables
|
38 |
+
are available (e.g. there is no data about grape types, wine brand, wine selling price, etc.).
|
39 |
+
|
40 |
+
These datasets can be viewed as classification or regression tasks.
|
41 |
+
The classes are ordered and not balanced (e.g. there are munch more normal wines than
|
42 |
+
excellent or poor ones). Outlier detection algorithms could be used to detect the few excellent
|
43 |
+
or poor wines. Also, we are not sure if all input variables are relevant. So
|
44 |
+
it could be interesting to test feature selection methods.
|
45 |
+
|
46 |
+
5. Number of Instances: red wine - 1599; white wine - 4898.
|
47 |
+
|
48 |
+
6. Number of Attributes: 11 + output attribute
|
49 |
+
|
50 |
+
Note: several of the attributes may be correlated, thus it makes sense to apply some sort of
|
51 |
+
feature selection.
|
52 |
+
|
53 |
+
7. Attribute information:
|
54 |
+
|
55 |
+
For more information, read [Cortez et al., 2009].
|
56 |
+
|
57 |
+
Input variables (based on physicochemical tests):
|
58 |
+
1 - fixed acidity
|
59 |
+
2 - volatile acidity
|
60 |
+
3 - citric acid
|
61 |
+
4 - residual sugar
|
62 |
+
5 - chlorides
|
63 |
+
6 - free sulfur dioxide
|
64 |
+
7 - total sulfur dioxide
|
65 |
+
8 - density
|
66 |
+
9 - pH
|
67 |
+
10 - sulphates
|
68 |
+
11 - alcohol
|
69 |
+
Output variable (based on sensory data):
|
70 |
+
12 - quality (score between 0 and 10)
|
71 |
+
|
72 |
+
8. Missing Attribute Values: None
|