* Bonatti et al. [2010] P. A. Bonatti, P. Kärger, and D. Olmedilla.  Reactive policies for the semantic web.  In _Extended Semantic Web Conference_ , pages 76–90. Springer, 2010\.
  * Booth et al. [2004] D. Booth, H. Haas, F. McCabe, E. Newcomer, M. Champion, C. Ferris, and D. Orchard.  Web services architecture.  Technical report, W3C Working Group, 2004.  URL https://www.w3.org/TR/ws-arch/#wsdisc.
  * Bordini and Hübner [2005] R. H. Bordini and J. F. Hübner.  Bdi agent programming in agentspeak using jason.  In _International workshop on computational logic in multi-agent systems_. Springer, 2005.
  * Braud et al. [2021] A. Braud, G. Fromentoux, B. Radier, and O. Le Grand.  The road to european digital sovereignty with gaia-x and idsa.  _IEEE Network_ , 35(2):4–5, 2021.
  * Brown et al. [1998] S. M. Brown, E. Santos, and S. B. Banks.  Utility theory-based user models for intelligent interface agents.  In _Conference of the Canadian Society for Computational Studies of Intelligence_ , pages 378–392. Springer, 1998.
  * Bryson [2000] J. Bryson.  Cross-paradigm analysis of autonomous agent architecture.  _Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence_, 12(2):165–189, 2000.
  * Bryson et al. [2002] J. J. Bryson, D. L. Martin, S. A. McIlraith, and L. A. Stein.  Toward behavioral intelligence in the semantic web.  _Computer_ , 35(11):48–54, 2002.
  * Bryson et al. [2003] J. J. Bryson, D. Martin, S. A. McIlraith, and L. A. Stein.  Agent-based composite services in daml-s: The behavior-oriented design of an intelligent semantic web.  In _Web Intelligence_ , pages 37–58. Springer, 2003.
  * Buhler and Vidal [2005] P. A. Buhler and J. M. Vidal.  Towards adaptive workflow enactment using multiagent systems.  _Information technology and management_ , 6(1):61–87, 2005.
  * Buoncompagni et al. [2017] L. Buoncompagni, A. Capitanelli, and F. Mastrogiovanni.  A ros multi-ontology references services: Owl reasoners and application prototyping issues.  _arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.10151_ , 2017.
  * Calbimonte et al. [2017] J.-P. Calbimonte, D. Calvaresi, and M. Schumacher.  Multi-agent interactions on the web through linked data notifications.  In _Multi-Agent Systems and Agreement Technologies_ , pages 44–53. Springer, 2017.
  * Casanovas [2015] P. Casanovas.  Semantic web regulatory models: Why ethics matter.  _Philosophy & technology_, 28(1):33–55, 2015\.
  * Castelfranchi [1994] C. Castelfranchi.  Guarantees for autonomy in cognitive agent architecture.  In _International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages_ , pages 56–70. Springer, 1994.
  * Challenger et al. [2018] M. Challenger, B. T. Tezel, O. F. Alaca, B. Tekinerdogan, and G. Kardas.  Development of semantic web-enabled bdi multi-agent systems using sea_ml: An electronic bartering case study.  _Applied Sciences_ , 8(5):688, 2018.
  * Chen et al. [2004] H. Chen, T. Finin, A. Joshi, L. Kagal, F. Perich, and D. Chakraborty.  Intelligent agents meet the semantic web in smart spaces.  _IEEE Internet computing_ , 8(6):69–79, 2004\.
  * Chiu and Leung [2005] D. K. Chiu and H.-f. Leung.  Towards ubiquitous tourist service coordination and integration: a multi-agent and semantic web approach.  In _Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Electronic commerce_ , pages 574–581, 2005.
  * Damianou et al. [2000] N. Damianou, N. Dulay, E. C. Lupu, and M. Sloman.  Ponder: A language for specifying security and management policies for distributed systems.  Technical report, Imperial College, Department of Computing, 2000.
  * Dantas et al. [2015] J. R. V. Dantas, H. A. Lira, B. de Azevedo Muniz, T. M. Nunes, and P. P. M. Farias.  Semantic web services discovery adopting serin.  In _2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer and Information Technology; Ubiquitous Computing and Communications; Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing; Pervasive Intelligence and Computing_ , pages 387–394. IEEE, 2015.
  * Davis et al. [2006] A. Davis, O. Dieste, A. Hickey, N. Juristo, and A. M. Moreno.  Effectiveness of requirements elicitation techniques: Empirical results derived from a systematic review.  In _14th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference (RE’06)_ , pages 179–188. IEEE, 2006.
  * Demarchi et al. [2018] F. Demarchi, E. R. Santos, and R. A. Silveira.  Integration between agents and remote ontologies for the use of content on the semantic web.  In _ICAART (1)_ , pages 125–132, 2018.
  * Dietzold and Auer [2006] S. Dietzold and S. Auer.  Access control on rdf triple stores from a semantic wiki perspective.  In _Proceedings of the ESWC’06 Workshop on Scripting for the Semantic Web_ , 2006.
  * Dignum [2018] V. Dignum.  Ethics in artificial intelligence: introduction to the special issue, 2018\.
  * Ding et al. [2003] L. Ding, L. Zhou, and T. W. Finin.  Trust based knowledge outsourcing for semantic web agents.  In _Web Intelligence_ , pages 379–387, 2003.
  * Ding et al. [2005] L. Ding, P. Kolari, T. Finin, A. Joshi, Y. Peng, and Y. Yesha.  On homeland security and the semantic web: A provenance and trust aware inference framework.  In _AAAI Spring Symposium: AI Technologies for Homeland Security_ , 2005.
  * Dong et al. [2015] J. S. Dong, Y. Feng, Y.-F. Li, C. K.-Y. Tan, B. Wadhwa, and H. H. Wang.  Bowl: augmenting the semantic web with beliefs.  _Innovations in Systems and Software Engineering_ , 11(3), 2015.
  * Dowling [2000] C. Dowling.  Intelligent agents: some ethical issues and dilemmas.  _Proc. AIC 2000_ , pages 28–32, 2000.
  * Ermolayev et al. [2004] V. Ermolayev, N. Keberle, S. Plaksin, O. Kononenko, and V. Terziyan.  Towards a framework for agent-enabled semantic web service composition.  _International Journal of Web Services Research (IJWSR)_ , 1(3):63–87, 2004.
  * Fernández et al. [2017] J. D. Fernández, S. Kirrane, A. Polleres, and S. Steyskal.  Self-enforcing access control for encrypted rdf.  In _European Semantic Web Conference_ , pages 607–622. Springer, 2017\.
  * Flouris et al. [2010] G. Flouris, I. Fundulaki, M. Michou, and G. Antoniou.  Controlling access to rdf graphs.  In _Proceedings of the Third Future Internet Conference on Future Internet_ , pages 107–117. Springer-Verlag, 2010.
  * Fornara and Colombetti [2019] N. Fornara and M. Colombetti.  Using semantic web technologies and production rules for reasoning on obligations, permissions, and prohibitions.  _AI Communications_ , 32(4):319–334, 2019.
  * Fornara et al. [2018] N. Fornara, A. Chiappa, and M. Colombetti.  Using semantic web technologies and production rules for reasoning on obligations and permissions.  In _International Conference on Agreement Technologies_ , pages 49–63. Springer, 2018.
  * Franklin and Graesser [1996] S. Franklin and A. Graesser.  Is it an agent, or just a program?: A taxonomy for autonomous agents.  In _International workshop on agent theories, architectures, and languages_ , pages 21–35. Springer, 1996.
  * Gabillon and Letouzey [2010] A. Gabillon and L. Letouzey.  A view based access control model for sparql.  In _Network and System Security (NSS), 2010 4th International Conference on_ , pages 105–112, Sept 2010.
  * Gandon [2019] F. Gandon.  The web we mix: Benevolent ais for a resilient web.  In _Proceedings of the 10th ACM Conference on Web Science_ , pages 115–116, 2019.
  * Gandon and Sadeh [2004] F. L. Gandon and N. M. Sadeh.  Semantic web technologies to reconcile privacy and context awareness.  _Journal of Web Semantics_ , 1(3):241–260, 2004\.
  * García-Sánchez et al. [2008] F. García-Sánchez, J. T. Fernández-Breis, R. Valencia-García, J. M. Gómez, and R. Martínez-Béjar.  Combining semantic web technologies with multi-agent systems for integrated access to biological resources.  _Journal of Biomedical Informatics_ , 41(5):848–859, 2008.
  * García-Sánchez et al. [2009] F. García-Sánchez, R. Valencia-García, R. Martínez-Béjar, and J. T. Fernández-Breis.  An ontology, intelligent agent-based framework for the provision of semantic web services.  _Expert Systems with Applications_ , 36(2):3167–3187, 2009.
  * Genesereth and Nilsson [2012] M. R. Genesereth and N. J. Nilsson.  _Logical foundations of artificial intelligence_.  Morgan Kaufmann, 2012.
  * Gerbracht [2008] S. Gerbracht.  Possibilities to Encrypt an RDF-Graph.  In _Proc. of Information and Communication Technologies: From Theory to Applications_ , pages 1–6, 2008.
  * Ghanadbashi and Golpayegani [2021] S. Ghanadbashi and F. Golpayegani.  Using ontology to guide reinforcement learning agents in unseen situations.  _Applied Intelligence_ , pages 1–17, 2021.
  * Gibbins et al. [2003] N. Gibbins, S. Harris, and N. Shadbolt.  Agent-based semantic web services.  In _Proceedings of the 12th international conference on World Wide Web_ , pages 710–717, 2003.
  * Giereth [2005] M. Giereth.  On Partial Encryption of RDF-Graphs.  In _Proc. of International Semantic Web Conference_ , volume 3729, pages 308–322, 2005.
  * Girardi and Leite [2013] R. Girardi and A. Leite.  A survey on software agent architectures.  _IEEE Intell. Informatics Bull._ , 14(1):8–20, 2013.
  * Gladun et al. [2009] A. Gladun, J. Rogushina, F. Garcı, R. Martínez-Béjar, J. T. Fernández-Breis, et al.  An application of intelligent techniques and semantic web technologies in e-learning environments.  _Expert Systems with Applications_ , 36(2):1922–1931, 2009.
  * Goguen and Linde [1993] J. A. Goguen and C. Linde.  Techniques for requirements elicitation.  In _[1993] Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering_ , pages 152–164. IEEE, 1993.
  * Gomes and Alferes [2015] A. S. Gomes and J. J. Alferes.  A procedure for an event-condition-transaction language.  In _International Conference on Web Reasoning and Rule Systems_ , pages 113–129. Springer, 2015.
  * Gordon et al. [2009] T. F. Gordon, G. Governatori, and A. Rotolo.  Rules and norms: Requirements for rule interchange languages in the legal domain.  In _International Workshop on Rules and Rule Markup Languages for the Semantic Web_ , pages 282–296. Springer, 2009.
  * Guo et al. [2005] Y. Guo, Z. Pan, and J. Heflin.  Lubm: A benchmark for owl knowledge base systems.  _Journal of Web Semantics_ , 3(2-3):158–182, 2005\.
  * Hajji and Al Maghrabi [2017] M. S. Hajji and A. Al Maghrabi.  Semantic web services methodology and tool extensions.  _International Journal of Applied Engineering Research_ , 12(2):256–262, 2017.
  * Harth and Käfer [2017] A. Harth and T. Käfer.  Specifying and executing user agent behaviour with condition-action rules.  In _Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Decentralizing the Semantic Web co-located with the 16th International Semantic Web Conference_ , 2017\.
  * Heitmann et al. [2017] B. Heitmann, F. Hermsen, and S. Decker.  k-rdf-neighbourhood anonymity: Combining structural and attribute-based anonymisation for linked data.  In _Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Society, Privacy and the Semantic Web - Policy and Technology (PrivOn2017) (PrivOn)_ , 2017.
  * Hendler [2001] J. Hendler.  Agents and the semantic web.  _IEEE Intelligent systems_ , 16(2):30–37, 2001\.
  * Hendler [2007] J. Hendler.  Where are all the intelligent agents?  _IEEE Annals of the History of Computing_ , 22(03):2–3, 2007.
  * Hermans [1997] B. Hermans.  Intelligent software agents on the internet: Chapters 6-7.  _First Monday_ , 1997.  URL https://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/fm/article/download/516/437.
  * High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence (2019) [AI HLEG] High-Level Expert Group on Artificial Intelligence (AI HLEG).  Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy AI, 2019.  URL https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai.
  * Hogan et al. [2021] A. Hogan, E. Blomqvist, M. Cochez, C. d’Amato, G. de Melo, C. Gutierrez, J. E. L. Gayo, S. Kirrane, S. Neumaier, A. Polleres, R. Navigli, A.-C. N. Ngomo, S. M. Rashid, A. Rula, L. Schmelzeisen, J. Sequeda, S. Staab, and A. Zimmermann.  Knowledge graphs, 2021.
  * Hoy [2018] M. B. Hoy.  Alexa, siri, cortana, and more: an introduction to voice assistants.  _Medical reference services quarterly_ , 37(1):81–88, 2018.
  * Huhns [2002] M. N. Huhns.  Agents as web services.  _IEEE Internet computing_ , 6(4):93–95, 2002\.
  * Jain and Farkas [2006] A. Jain and C. Farkas.  Secure resource description framework: An access control model.  In _Proceedings of the Eleventh ACM Symposium on Access Control Models and Technologies_ , pages 121–129. ACM, 2006.
  * Jennings and Wooldridge [1996] N. Jennings and M. Wooldridge.  Software agents.  _IEE review_ , 42(1):17–20, 1996.
  * Jochum et al. [2019] B. Jochum, L. Nürnberg, N. Aßfalg, and T. Käfer.  Data-driven workflows for specifying and executing agents in an environment of reasoning and restful systems.  In _International Conference on Business Process Management_ , pages 93–105. Springer, 2019.
  * Jutla and Xu [2004] D. Jutla and L. Xu.  Privacy agents and ontology for the semantic web.  _AMCIS 2004 Proceedings_ , page 210, 2004.
  * Jutla et al. [2006] D. N. Jutla, P. Bodorik, and Y. Zhang.  Pecan: An architecture for users’ privacy-aware electronic commerce contexts on the semantic web.  _Information Systems_ , 31(4-5):295–320, 2006\.
  * Käfer and Harth [2018] T. Käfer and A. Harth.  Rule-based programming of user agents for linked data.  In _LDOW@ WWW_ , 2018.
  * Kagal and Finin [2003] L. Kagal and T. Finin.  A policy language for a pervasive computing environment.  In _Proceedings POLICY 2003. IEEE 4th International Workshop on Policies for Distributed Systems and Networks_ , pages 63–74. IEEE Comput. Soc, 2003.
  * Kagal et al. [2004] L. Kagal, T. Finin, M. Paolucci, N. Srinivasan, K. Sycara, and G. Denker.  Authorization and privacy for semantic web services.  _IEEE Intelligent Systems_ , 19(4):50–56, 2004\.
  * Kagal et al. [2002] L. Kagal et al.  Rei: A policy language for the me-centric project.  Technical report, HP Laboratories Palo Alto, 2002.
  * Kasten et al. [2013] A. Kasten, A. Scherp, F. Armknecht, and M. Krause.  Towards search on encrypted graph data.  In _Proc. of the International Conference on Society, Privacy and the Semantic Web-Policy and Technology_ , pages 46–57, 2013.
  * Kasten et al. [2014] A. Kasten, A. Scherp, and P. Schauß.  _A Framework for Iterative Signing of Graph Data on the Web_ , pages 146–160.  Springer International Publishing, 2014.  doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-07443-6_11.  URL https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07443-6_11.
  * Khalili et al. [2008] A. Khalili, A. H. Badrabadi, and F. Khoshalhan.  A framework for distributed market place based on intelligent software agents and semantic web services.  In _2008 IEEE Congress on Services Part II (services-2 2008)_ , pages 141–148. IEEE, 2008.
  * Kirrane and Decker [2018] S. Kirrane and S. Decker.  Intelligent agents: The vision revisited.  In _Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Decentralizing the Semantic Web co-located with the 17th International Semantic Web Conference_ , 2018\.
  * Kirrane et al. [2013] S. Kirrane, A. Abdelrahman, A. Mileo, and S. Decker.  Secure manipulation of linked data.  In _The Semantic Web - ISWC 2013_ , volume 8218. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013.
  * Kirrane et al. [2020] S. Kirrane, M. Sabou, J. D. Fernández, F. Osborne, C. Robin, P. Buitelaar, E. Motta, and A. Polleres.  A decade of semantic web research through the lenses of a mixed methods approach.  _Semantic Web_ , 11(6):979–1005, 2020.
  * Kootbally et al. [2017] Z. Kootbally, T. R. Kramer, C. Schlenoff, and S. K. Gupta.  Overview of an ontology-based approach for kit building applications.  In _2017 ieee 11th international conference on semantic computing (icsc)_ , pages 520–525. IEEE, 2017.
  * Kravari et al. [2016] K. Kravari, N. Bassiliades, and G. Governatori.  A policy-based b2c e-contract management workflow methodology using semantic web agents.  _Artificial Intelligence and Law_ , 24(2):93–131, 2016.
  * Ksystra and Stefaneas [2016] K. Ksystra and P. Stefaneas.  Formal analysis and verification support for reactive rule-based web agents.  _International Journal of Web Information Systems_ , 2016.
  * Laufer and Schwabe [2017] C. Laufer and D. Schwabe.  On modeling political systems to support the trust process.  In _Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Society, Privacy and the Semantic Web - Policy and Technology (PrivOn2017) (PrivOn)_ , 2017.
  * Leite and Girardi [2014] A. Leite and R. Girardi.  A case-based reasoning architecture of a hybrid software agent.  In _2014 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conferences on Web Intelligence (WI) and Intelligent Agent Technologies (IAT)_ , volume 3, pages 79–86. IEEE, 2014.
  * Leite et al. [2013] A. Leite, R. Girardi, and P. Novais.  Using ontologies in hybrid software agent architectures.  In _2013 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conferences on Web Intelligence (WI) and Intelligent Agent Technologies (IAT)_ , volume 3, pages 155–158. IEEE, 2013.
  * Lin [2016] Z. Lin.  From isomorphism-based security for graphs to semantics-preserving security for the resource description framework (rdf).  Master’s thesis, University of Waterloo, 2016.
  * Lister et al. [2002] K. Lister, L. Sterling, et al.  Reconciling ontological differences for intelligent agents.  _Meaning Negotiation, AAAI Press (Menlo Park, America, 2002)_ , 2002\.
  * Luck et al. [2005] M. Luck, P. McBurney, O. Shehory, and S. Willmott.  Agent technology: computing as interaction (a roadmap for agent based computing).  Technical report, University of Southampton, 2005.
  * Maes [1995] P. Maes.  Artificial life meets entertainment: lifelike autonomous agents.  _Communications of the ACM_ , 38(11):108–114, 1995.
  * McIlraith et al. [2001] S. A. McIlraith, T. C. Son, and H. Zeng.  Semantic web services.  _IEEE intelligent systems_ , 16(2):46–53, 2001\.
  * Merkle and Philipp [2019] N. Merkle and P. Philipp.  Cooperative web agents by combining semantic technologies with reinforcement learning.  In _Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Knowledge Capture_ , pages 205–212, 2019.
  * Ming et al. [2017] Z. Ming, G. Wang, Y. Yan, J. Dal Santo, J. K. Allen, and F. Mistree.  An ontology for reusable and executable decision templates.  _Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering_ , 17(3), 2017.
  * Mizoguchi et al. [1995] R. Mizoguchi, M. Ikeda, K. Seta, and J. Vanwelkenhuysen.  Ontology for modeling the world from problem solving perspectives.  In _Proc. of IJCAI-95 Workshop on Basic Ontological Issues in Knowledge Sharing_ , pages 1–12, 1995.
  * Morgenstern and Von Neumann [1953] O. Morgenstern and J. Von Neumann.  _Theory of games and economic behavior_.  Princeton university press, 1953.
  * Motta et al. [2003] E. Motta, J. Domingue, L. Cabral, and M. Gaspari.  Irs–ii: A framework and infrastructure for semantic web services.  In _International Semantic Web Conference_ , pages 306–318. Springer, 2003.
  * Muller [2008] G. Muller.  A reference architecture primer.  _Eindhoven Univ. of Techn., Eindhoven, White paper_ , 2008.
  * Müller [1998] J. P. Müller.  Architectures and applications of intelligent agents: A survey.  _Knowledge Engineering Review_ , 13(4):353–380, 1998.
  * Newell and Simon [2007] A. Newell and H. A. Simon.  Computer science as empirical inquiry: Symbols and search.  In _ACM Turing award lectures_ , page 1975, 2007.
  * Ngomo and Röder [2016] A.-C. N. Ngomo and M. Röder.  Hobbit: holistic benchmarking for big linked data.  _ERCIM News_ , 2016(105), 2016.
  * Oren et al. [2008] E. Oren, R. Delbru, M. Catasta, R. Cyganiak, H. Stenzhorn, and G. Tummarello.  Sindice. com: a document-oriented lookup index for open linked data.  _International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies_ , 3(1):37–52, 2008.
  * Outtagarts [2009] A. Outtagarts.  Mobile agent-based applications: A survey.  _International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security_ , 9(11):331–339, 2009.
  * Pai et al. [2016] F.-P. Pai, I.-C. Hsu, and Y.-C. Chung.  Semantic web technology for agent interoperability: a proposed infrastructure.  _Applied Intelligence_ , 44(1):1–16, 2016.
  * Pal et al. [2020] C.-V. Pal, F. Leon, M. Paprzycki, and M. Ganzha.  A review of platforms for the development of agent systems.  _arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.08961_ , 2020.
  * Palmirani et al. [2011] M. Palmirani, G. Governatori, A. Rotolo, S. Tabet, H. Boley, and A. Paschke.  Legalruleml: Xml-based rules and norms.  In _International Workshop on Rules and Rule Markup Languages for the Semantic Web_. Springer, 2011.
  * Palmirani et al. [2018] M. Palmirani, M. Martoni, A. Rossi, C. Bartolini, and L. Robaldo.  Pronto: Privacy ontology for legal reasoning.  In _International Conference on Electronic Government and the Information Systems Perspective_. Springer, 2018.
  * Panait and Luke [2005] L. Panait and S. Luke.  Cooperative multi-agent learning: The state of the art.  _Autonomous agents and multi-agent systems_ , 11(3):387–434, 2005.
  * Paolucci and Sycara [2003] M. Paolucci and K. Sycara.  Autonomous semantic web services.  _IEEE Internet computing_ , 7(5):34–41, 2003\.
  * Papamarkos et al. [2003] G. Papamarkos, A. Poulovassilis, and P. T. Wood.  Event-condition-action rule languages for the semantic web.  In _Proceedings of the First International Conference on Semantic Web and Databases_ , pages 294–312. Citeseer, 2003.
  * Papamarkos et al. [2004] G. Papamarkos, A. Poulovassilis, and P. T. Wood.  Rdftl: An event-condition-action language for rdf.  In _Proc. of the 3rd International Workshop on Web Dynamics_ , 2004\.
  * Payne [2008] T. R. Payne.  Web services from an agent perspective.  _IEEE Intelligent Systems_ , 23(2):12–14, 2008\.
  * Pham and Stacey [2011] H. Pham and D. Stacey.  Practical goal-based reasoning in ontology-driven applications.  In _KEOD_ , pages 99–109, 2011.
  * Poslad [2007] S. Poslad.  Specifying protocols for multi-agent systems interaction.  _ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems (TAAS)_ , 2(4):15–es, 2007.
  * Poulovassilis et al. [2006] A. Poulovassilis, G. Papamarkos, and P. T. Wood.  Event-condition-action rule languages for the semantic web.  In _International conference on extending database technology_ , pages 855–864. Springer, 2006.
  * Puerto et al. [2012] E. Puerto, J. Aguilar, et al.  Automatic learning of ontologies for the semantic web: Experiment lexical learning.  _Respuestas_ , 17(2):5–12, 2012.
  * Radulovic et al. [2015] F. Radulovic, R. García Castro, and A. Gómez-Pérez.  Towards the anonymisation of rdf data, 2015.  URL https://doi.org/10.18293/SEKE2015-167.
  * Rajpathak and Motta [2004] D. Rajpathak and E. Motta.  An ontological formalization of the planning task.  In _International Conference on Formal Ontology in Information Systems (FOIS 2004)_ , pages 305–316, 2004.
  * Rao et al. [1995] A. S. Rao, M. P. Georgeff, et al.  Bdi agents: From theory to practice.  In _Icmas_ , volume 95, pages 312–319, 1995.
  * Reddivari et al. [2005] P. Reddivari, T. Finin, and A. Joshi.  Policy-based access control for an rdf store.  In _Proceedings of the Policy Management for the Web workshop_ , pages 78–83, 2005.
  * Rosenschein and Genesereth [1988] J. S. Rosenschein and M. R. Genesereth.  Deals among rational agents.  In _Readings in Distributed Artificial Intelligence_ , pages 227–234. Elsevier, 1988.
  * Russel and Norvig [2013] S. Russel and P. Norvig.  _Artificial intelligence: a modern approach_.  Pearson Education Limited, 2013.
  * Sacco and Passant [2011] O. Sacco and A. Passant.  A privacy preference ontology (ppo) for linked data.  In _Linked Data on the Web_. CEUR-WS, 2011.
  * Schraudner and Charpenay [2020] D. Schraudner and V. Charpenay.  An http/rdf-based agent infrastructure for manufacturing using stigmergy.  In _European Semantic Web Conference_ , pages 197–202. Springer, 2020\.
  * Scioscia et al. [2014] F. Scioscia, M. Ruta, G. Loseto, F. Gramegna, S. Ieva, A. Pinto, and E. Di Sciascio.  A mobile matchmaker for the ubiquitous semantic web.  _International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems (IJSWIS)_ , 10(4):77–100, 2014.
  * Sculley and Byrne [1987] J. Sculley and J. A. Byrne.  _Odyssey_.  Harper & Row Publishers, Inc., 1987.
  * Seghir and Kazar [2017] N. B. Seghir and O. Kazar.  A new framework for web service discovery in distributed environments.  In _2017 First International Conference on Embedded & Distributed Systems (EDiS)_, pages 1–6. IEEE, 2017.
  * Seghir et al. [2015] N. B. Seghir, O. Kazar, and K. Rezeg.  A decentralized framework for semantic web services discovery using mobile agent.  _International Journal of Information Technology and Web Engineering (IJITWE)_ , 10(4):20–43, 2015.
  * Seghir et al. [2017] N. B. Seghir, O. Kazar, K. Rezeg, and S. Bourekkache.  A semantic web services discovery approach based on a mobile agent using metadata.  _International Journal of Intelligent Computing and Cybernetics_ , 2017.
  * Shafiq et al. [2006] M. O. Shafiq, Y. Ding, and D. Fensel.  Bridging multi agent systems and web services: towards interoperability between software agents and semantic web services.  In _2006 10th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference (EDOC’06)_ , pages 85–96. IEEE, 2006.
  * Sheshagiri et al. [2004] M. Sheshagiri, N. Sadeh, and F. Gandon.  Using semantic web services for context-aware mobile applications.  In _MobiSys 2004 Workshop on Context Awareness_. Citeseer, 2004.
  * Shi et al. [2016] W. Shi, J. Cao, Q. Zhang, Y. Li, and L. Xu.  Edge computing: Vision and challenges.  _IEEE internet of things journal_ , 3(5):637–646, 2016.
  * Shoham et al. [2003] Y. Shoham, R. Powers, and T. Grenager.  Multi-agent reinforcement learning: a critical survey.  Technical report, Technical report, Stanford University, 2003.
  * Silva et al. [2017] R. R. C. Silva, B. C. Leal, F. T. Brito, V. M. P. Vidal, and J. C. Machado.  A differentially private approach for querying rdf data of social networks.  In _Proceedings of the 21st International Database Engineering & Applications Symposium_, pages 74–81. ACM, 2017.  ISBN 978-1-4503-5220-8.
  * Sommerville et al. [1998] I. Sommerville, P. Sawyer, and S. Viller.  Viewpoints for requirements elicitation: a practical approach.  In _Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering: RE’98_ , pages 74–81. IEEE, 1998.
  * Sycara et al. [2004] K. Sycara, M. Paolucci, J. Soudry, and N. Srinivasan.  Dynamic discovery and coordination of agent-based semantic web services.  _IEEE Internet computing_ , 8(3):66–73, 2004\.
  * Tamma and Payne [2008] V. Tamma and T. R. Payne.  Is a semantic web agent a knowledge-savvy agent?  _IEEE Intelligent Systems_ , 23(4):82–85, 2008\.
  * Tamma et al. [2004] V. Tamma, I. Blacoe, B. L. Smith, and M. Wooldridge.  Serse: searching for semantic web content.  In _ECAI_ , volume 16, page 63, 2004.
  * Terziyan [2008] V. Terziyan.  Smartresource–proactive self-maintained resources in semantic web: Lessons learned.  _International Journal of Smart Home_ , 2(2):33–57, 2008.
  * Tonti et al. [2003] G. Tonti, J. M. Bradshaw, R. Jeffers, R. Montanari, N. Suri, and A. Uszok.  Semantic web languages for policy representation and reasoning: A comparison of kaos, rei, and ponder.  In _International Semantic Web Conference_ , pages 419–437. Springer, 2003.
  * Torraco [2005] R. J. Torraco.  Writing integrative literature reviews: Guidelines and examples.  _Human resource development review_ , 4(3):356–367, 2005.
  * Usbeck et al. [2015] R. Usbeck, M. Röder, A.-C. Ngonga Ngomo, C. Baron, A. Both, M. Brümmer, D. Ceccarelli, M. Cornolti, D. Cherix, B. Eickmann, et al.  Gerbil: general entity annotator benchmarking framework.  In _Proceedings of the 24th international conference on World Wide Web_ , pages 1133–1143, 2015.
  * Uszok et al. [2003] A. Uszok, J. Bradshaw, R. Jeffers, N. Suri, P. Hayes, M. Breedy, L. Bunch, M. Johnson, S. Kulkarni, and J. Lott.  Kaos policy and domain services: Toward a description-logic approach to policy representation, deconfliction, and enforcement.  In _Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Workshop on Policies for Distributed Systems and Networks_ , pages 93–. IEEE Computer Society, 2003.
  * Uszok et al. [2004] A. Uszok, J. M. Bradshaw, M. Johnson, R. Jeffers, A. Tate, J. Dalton, and S. Aitken.  Kaos policy management for semantic web services.  _IEEE Intelligent Systems_ , 19(4):32–41, 2004\.
  * Van Der Vecht et al. [2006] B. Van Der Vecht, A. P. Meyer, M. Neef, F. Dignum, and J.-J. C. Meyer.  Influence-based autonomy levels in agent decision-making.  In _International Workshop on Coordination, Organizations, Institutions, and Norms in Agent Systems_ , pages 322–337. Springer, 2006.
  * Van Riemsdijk et al. [2015] M. B. Van Riemsdijk, L. Dennis, M. Fisher, and K. V. Hindriks.  A semantic framework for socially adaptive agents: Towards strong norm compliance.  In _Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems_ , pages 423–432. Citeseer, 2015.
  * Venkatachalam et al. [2016] K. Venkatachalam, N. Karthikeyan, and S. Kannimuthu.  Comprehensive survey on semantic web service discovery and composition.  _Adv Nat Appl Sci AENSI Publ_ , 10(5):32–40, 2016\.
  * Verborgh et al. [2015] R. Verborgh, E. Mannnens, and R. Van de Walle.  Bottom-up web apis with self-descriptive responses.  In _Proceedings of the First Karlsruhe Service Summit Workshop-Advances in Service Research_ , page 143, 2015.
  * Wang et al. [2015] H. H. Wang, N. Gibbins, T. Payne, A. Patelli, and Y. Wang.  A survey of semantic web services formalisms.  _Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience_ , 27(15):4053–4072, 2015.
  * White [1994] J. White.  Telescript technology: the foundation for the electronic marketplace.  Technical report, General Magic, 1994.  URL http://www.datarover.com/Telescript/Whitepapers/wp1/whitepaper-1.html.
  * Whittemore and Knafl [2005] R. Whittemore and K. Knafl.  The integrative review: updated methodology.  _Journal of advanced nursing_ , 52(5):546–553, 2005.
  * Wong [2009] W. Y. Wong.  _Learning lightweight ontologies from text across different domains using the web as background knowledge_.  University of Western Australia, 2009.
  * Wooldridge [2001] M. Wooldridge.  Intelligent agents: The key concepts.  In _ECCAI Advanced Course on Artificial Intelligence_ , pages 3–43. Springer, 2001.
  * Wooldridge and Jennings [1994] M. Wooldridge and N. R. Jennings.  Agent theories, architectures, and languages: a survey.  In _International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages_ , pages 1–39. Springer, 1994.
  * Wooldridge and Jennings [1995] M. J. Wooldridge and N. R. Jennings.  Intelligent agents: Theory and practice.  _The knowledge engineering review_ , 10(2):115–152, 1995.
  * Young et al. [2016] J. Young, V. Basile, L. Kunze, E. Cabrio, and N. Hawes.  Towards lifelong object learning by integrating situated robot perception and semantic web mining.  In _22nd European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, ECAI 2016_ , volume 285, pages 1458–1466. IOS Press, 2016.
  * Zapater et al. [2015] J. J. S. Zapater, D. M. L. Escrivá, F. R. S. García, and J. J. M. Durá.  Semantic web service discovery system for road traffic information services.  _Expert Systems with Applications_ , 42(8):3833–3842, 2015.
  * Zowghi and Coulin [2005] D. Zowghi and C. Coulin.  Requirements elicitation: A survey of techniques, approaches, and tools.  In _Engineering and managing software requirements_ , pages 19–46. Springer, 2005.