* Dehe and Bamford (2015) Dehe, B., Bamford, D., 2015\.  Development, test and comparison of two Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) models: A case of healthcare infrastructure location.  Expert Systems with Applications 42, 6717–6727.  doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.04.059.
  * Dell’Ovo et al. (2018) Dell’Ovo, M., Capolongo, S., Oppio, A., 2018.  Combining spatial analysis with MCDA for the siting of healthcare facilities.  Land Use Policy 76, 634–644.  doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.02.044.
  * Demartini and Trucco (2017) Demartini, C., Trucco, S., 2017\.  Are performance measurement systems useful? Perceptions from health care.  BMC health services research 17, 1–15.  doi:10.1186/s12913-017-2022-9.
  * Dempsey et al. (2011) Dempsey, N., Bramley, G., Power, S., Brown, C., 2011\.  The social dimension of sustainable development: Defining urban social sustainability.  Sustainable development 19, 289–300.  doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.417.
  * Deng et al. (2021) Deng, J., Deng, Y., Cheong, K.H., 2021.  Combining conflicting evidence based on Pearson correlation coefficient and weighted graph.  International Journal of Intelligent Systems 36, 7443–7460.  doi:10.1002/int.22593.
  * Dezert et al. (2020) Dezert, J., Tchamova, A., Han, D., Tacnet, J.M., 2020\.  The SPOTIS rank reversal free method for multi-criteria decision-making support, in: 2020 IEEE 23rd International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION), IEEE. pp. 1–8.  doi:https://doi.org/10.23919/FUSION45008.2020.9190347.
  * Drucker (2012) Drucker, P., 2012.  The practice of management.  Routledge.
  * Du et al. (2020) Du, Y., Zheng, Y., Wu, G., Tang, Y., 2020.  Decision-making method of heavy-duty machine tool remanufacturing based on AHP-entropy weight and extension theory.  Journal of Cleaner Production 252, 119607.  doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119607.
  * Duleba (2022) Duleba, S., 2022.  Introduction and comparative analysis of the multi-level parsimonious AHP methodology in a public transport development decision problem.  Journal of the Operational Research Society 73, 230–243.  doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2020.1824553.
  * Eastlick and Haapala (2012) Eastlick, D.D., Haapala, K.R., 2012\.  Increasing the utility of sustainability assessment in product design, in: International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, American Society of Mechanical Engineers. pp. 713–722.  doi:https://doi.org/10.1115/DETC2012-71144.
  * energyinpython (2022) energyinpython, 2022.  SSP-AHP for sustainability assessment.  URL: https://github.com/energyinpython/SSP-AHP-sustainability-assessment.
  * Eslami et al. (2019) Eslami, Y., Dassisti, M., Lezoche, M., Panetto, H., 2019\.  A survey on sustainability in manufacturing organisations: dimensions and future insights.  International Journal of Production Research 57, 5194–5214.  doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2018.1544723.
  * Ezbakhe and Perez-Foguet (2018) Ezbakhe, F., Perez-Foguet, A., 2018\.  Multi-criteria decision analysis under uncertainty: two approaches to incorporating data uncertainty into water, sanitation and hygiene planning.  Water resources management 32, 5169–5182.  doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-2152-9.
  * Fujisawa and Klazinga (2017) Fujisawa, R., Klazinga, N.S., 2017\.  Measuring patient experiences (PREMS): Progress made by the OECD and its member countries between 2006 and 2016.  OECD Health Working Papers 102.  URL: https://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=DELSA/HEA/WD/HWP(2017)12&docLanguage=En.
  * Gaál et al. (2011) Gaál, P., Szigeti, S., Csere, M., Gaskins, M., Panteli, D., Organization, W.H., et al., 2011\.  Hungary: Health system review.  URL: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/330326.
  * Garcés et al. (2003) Garcés, J., Ródenas, F., Sanjosé, V., 2003.  Towards a new welfare state: the social sustainability principle and health care strategies.  Health Policy 65, 201–215.  doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-8510(02)00200-2.
  * Giovanelli et al. (2015) Giovanelli, L., Marinò, L., Rotondo, F., Fadda, N., Ezza, A., Amadori, M., 2015\.  Developing a performance evaluation system for the Italian public healthcare sector.  Public Money & Management 35, 297–302.  doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2015.1047274.
  * Goepel (2018) Goepel, K.D., 2018.  Implementation of an online software tool for the analytic hierarchy process (AHP-OS).  International journal of the analytic hierarchy process 10.  doi:https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v10i3.590.
  * Gouda and Saranga (2020) Gouda, S.K., Saranga, H., 2020\.  Pressure or premium: what works best where? Antecedents and outcomes of sustainable manufacturing practices.  International Journal of Production Research 58, 7201–7217.  doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2020.1717010.
  * Greve (2016) Greve, B., 2016.  Migrants and health in the Nordic welfare states.  Public Health Reviews 37, 1–11.  doi:10.1186/s40985-016-0023-6.
  * Hajirasouli and Kumarasuriyar (2016) Hajirasouli, A., Kumarasuriyar, A., 2016\.  The social dimention of sustainability: Towards some definitions and analysis.  Journal of Social Science for Policy Implications 4, 23–34.  doi:https://doi.org/10.15640/jsspi.v4n2a3.
  * Hallstedt (2017) Hallstedt, S.I., 2017.  Sustainability criteria and sustainability compliance index for decision support in product development.  Journal of Cleaner production 140, 251–266.  doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.068.
  * Hollander et al. (2016) Hollander, R., Amekudzi-Kennedy, A., Bell, S., Benya, F., Davidson, C., Farkos, C., Fasenfest, D., Guyer, R., Hjarding, A., Lizotte, M., et al., 2016\.  Network priorities for social sustainability research and education: Memorandum of the Integrated Network on Social Sustainability Research Group.  Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy 12, 1–7.  doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2016.11908150.
  * Huang and Badurdeen (2017) Huang, A., Badurdeen, F., 2017\.  Sustainable manufacturing performance evaluation: Integrating product and process metrics for systems level assessment.  Procedia Manufacturing 8, 563–570.  doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.02.072.
  * Hugé et al. (2013) Hugé, J., Waas, T., Dahdouh-Guebas, F., Koedam, N., Block, T., 2013.  A discourse-analytical perspective on sustainability assessment: interpreting sustainable development in practice.  Sustainability science 8, 187–198.  doi:10.1007/s11625-012-0184-2.
  * Huq et al. (2014) Huq, F.A., Stevenson, M., Zorzini, M., 2014.  Social sustainability in developing country suppliers: An exploratory study in the ready made garments industry of Bangladesh.  International Journal of Operations & Production Management 34, 610–638.  doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-10-2012-0467.
  * Hurst and Jee-Hughes (2001) Hurst, J., Jee-Hughes, M., 2001\.  Performance measurement and performance management in OECD health systems.  Occasional Papers 47.  URL: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/788224073713.pdf?expires=1644004185&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=138BFDDA56718B93A4C4B456E1797D56.
  * Hussain et al. (2019) Hussain, M., Khan, M., Ajmal, M., 2019.  Exploration and assessment of the motivators of social sustainability in healthcare supply chains: Multistake holder’s perspective.  Sustainable Development 27, 573–586.  doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1922.
  * Hussain et al. (2016) Hussain, M., Khan, M., Al-Aomar, R., 2016.  A framework for supply chain sustainability in service industry with Confirmatory Factor Analysis.  Renewable and sustainable energy reviews 55, 1301–1312.  doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.097.
  * Jahani Sayyad Noveiri and Kordrostami (2021) Jahani Sayyad Noveiri, M., Kordrostami, S., 2021\.  Sustainability assessment using a fuzzy DEA aggregation approach: A healthcare application.  Soft Computing 25, 10829–10849.  doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-021-05992-y.
  * Kim and Jeon (2020) Kim, H., Jeon, B., 2020.  Developing a framework for performance assessment of the public long-term care system in Korea: methodological and policy lessons.  Health Research Policy and Systems 18, 1–10.  doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-020-0529-8.
  * Kollberg et al. (2005) Kollberg, B., Elg, M., Lindmark, J., 2005.  Design and implementation of a performance measurement system in Swedish health care services: a multiple case study of 6 development teams.  Quality Management in Healthcare 14, 95–111.
  * Kumar and Anbanandam (2019) Kumar, A., Anbanandam, R., 2019\.  Development of social sustainability index for freight transportation system.  Journal of cleaner production 210, 77–92.  doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.353.
  * Lahelma et al. (2002) Lahelma, E., Kivelä, K., Roos, E., Tuominen, T., Dahl, E., Diderichsen, F., Elstad, J.I., Lissau, I., Lundberg, O., Rahkonen, O., et al., 2002\.  Analysing changes of health inequalities in the Nordic welfare states.  Social science & medicine 55, 609–625.  doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00191-5.
  * Lawal et al. (2021) Lawal, A.S., Servadio, J.L., Davis, T., Ramaswami, A., Botchwey, N., Russell, A.G., 2021\.  Orthogonalization and machine learning methods for residential energy estimation with social and economic indicators.  Applied Energy 283, 116114\.  doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.116114.
  * Lennox et al. (2020) Lennox, L., Linwood-Amor, A., Maher, L., Reed, J., 2020\.  Making change last? Exploring the value of sustainability approaches in healthcare: a scoping review.  Health research policy and systems 18, 1–24.  doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-020-00601-0.
  * Lennox et al. (2018) Lennox, L., Maher, L., Reed, J., 2018.  Navigating the sustainability landscape: a systematic review of sustainability approaches in healthcare.  Implementation Science 13, 1–17.  doi:10.1186/s13012-017-0707-4.
  * Levesque and Sutherland (2020) Levesque, J.F., Sutherland, K., 2020\.  Combining patient, clinical and system perspectives in assessing performance in healthcare: an integrated measurement framework.  BMC health services research 20, 1–14.  doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4807-5.
  * Li et al. (2022a) Li, X., Han, Z., Yazdi, M., Chen, G., 2022a.  A CRITIC-VIKOR based robust approach to support risk management of subsea pipelines.  Applied Ocean Research 124, 103187\.  doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apor.2022.103187.
  * Li et al. (2020) Li, Y., Zhang, Q., Wang, L., Liang, L., 2020.  Regional environmental efficiency in China: An empirical analysis based on entropy weight method and non-parametric models.  Journal of Cleaner Production 276, 124147.  doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124147.
  * Li et al. (2022b) Li, Z., Luo, Z., Wang, Y., Fan, G., Zhang, J., 2022b.  Suitability evaluation system for the shallow geothermal energy implementation in region by Entropy Weight Method and TOPSIS method.  Renewable Energy 184, 564–576.  doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.11.112.
  * Lizarondo et al. (2014) Lizarondo, L., Grimmer, K., Kumar, S., 2014.  Assisting allied health in performance evaluation: a systematic review.  BMC health services research 14, 1–12.  doi:10.1186/s12913-014-0572-7.
  * Locke and Latham (2013) Locke, E.A., Latham, G.P., 2013\.  New developments in goal setting and task performance.  New York: Routledge, 2013.
  * Lotfi and Fallahnejad (2010) Lotfi, F.H., Fallahnejad, R., 2010\.  Imprecise Shannon’s entropy and multi attribute decision making.  Entropy 12, 53–62.  doi:10.3390/e12010053.
  * Lu et al. (2011) Lu, T., Gupta, A., Jayal, A., Badurdeen, F., Feng, S.C., Jawahir, I., et al., 2011.  A framework of product and process metrics for sustainable manufacturing, in: Advances in sustainable manufacturing. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 333–338.  doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20183-7_48.
  * Macassa and Tomaselli (2020) Macassa, G., Tomaselli, G., 2020\.  Rethinking developed nations’ health systems through a social sustainability perspective in the light of the COVID-19 pandemic. A viewpoint.  Journal of Public Health Research 9\.  doi:10.4081/jphr.2020.1834.
  * Maghsoudi et al. (2020) Maghsoudi, T., Cascon-Pereira, R., Beatriz Hernández Lara, A., 2020.  The role of collaborative healthcare in improving social sustainability: A conceptual framework.  Sustainability 12, 3195\.  doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083195.
  * Magnussen et al. (2009) Magnussen, J., Vrangbaek, K., Saltman, R., 2009.  EBOOK: Nordic Health Care Systems: Recent Reforms and Current Policy Challenges.  Open University Press: New York.  URL: https://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/98417/E93429.pdf.
  * Makan and Fadili (2021) Makan, A., Fadili, A., 2021\.  Sustainability assessment of healthcare waste treatment systems using surrogate weights and PROMETHEE method.  Waste Management & Research 39, 73–82.  doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X20947162.
  * Matters (2019) Matters, O.M.W., 2019.  The Patient-Reported Indicator Surveys.  Measuring What Matters: the Patient-Reported Indicator Surveys, Patient-Reported Indicators for Assessing Health System Performance, Status Report 3019, OECD, 2019 URL: https://www.oecd.org/health/health-systems/Measuring-what-matters-the-Patient-Reported-Indicator-Surveys.pdf.
  * Moldavska and Welo (2016) Moldavska, A., Welo, T., 2016\.  Development of manufacturing sustainability assessment using systems thinking.  Sustainability 8, 5\.  doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su8010005.
  * Moldavska and Welo (2019) Moldavska, A., Welo, T., 2019\.  A Holistic approach to corporate sustainability assessment: Incorporating sustainable development goals into sustainable manufacturing performance evaluation.  Journal of Manufacturing Systems 50, 53–68.  doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2018.11.004.
  * Moore et al. (2017) Moore, J.E., Mascarenhas, A., Bain, J., Straus, S.E., 2017\.  Developing a comprehensive definition of sustainability.  Implementation Science 12, 1–8.  doi:10.1186/s13012-017-0637-1.
  * Morrison-Saunders et al. (2015) Morrison-Saunders, A., Pope, J., Bond, A., 2015.  Handbook of sustainability assessment.  Edward Elgar Publishing.
  * Mühlbacher and Kaczynski (2016) Mühlbacher, A.C., Kaczynski, A., 2016\.  Making good decisions in healthcare with multi-criteria decision analysis: the use, current research and future development of MCDA.  Applied health economics and health policy 14, 29–40.  doi:DOI10.1007/s40258-015-0203-4.
  * Murphy (2012) Murphy, K., 2012.  The social pillar of sustainable development: a literature review and framework for policy analysis.  Sustainability: Science, practice and policy 8, 15–29.  doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2012.11908081.
  * Murray and Frenk (2000) Murray, C.J., Frenk, J., 2000\.  A framework for assessing the performance of health systems.  Bulletin of the world Health Organization 78, 717–731.
  * Németh et al. (2019) Németh, B., Molnár, A., Bozóki, S., Wijaya, K., Inotai, A., Campbell, J.D., Kaló, Z., 2019.  Comparison of weighting methods used in multicriteria decision analysis frameworks in healthcare with focus on low-and middle-income countries.  Journal of comparative effectiveness research 8, 195–204.  doi:https://doi.org/10.2217/cer-2018-0102.
  * Norouzi and Fani (2021) Norouzi, N., Fani, M., 2021\.  Comparison of Weak and Strong Theories of Environmental Sustainability in the Conceptual Context of Sustainable Development.  Research Journal of Ecology and Environmental Sciences 1, 108–122.  doi:10.31586/rjees.2021.144.
  * OECD (2021a) OECD, 2021a.  France: Country Health Profile 2021, State of Health in the EU.
  * OECD (2021b) OECD, 2021b.  Hungary: Country Health Profile 2021, State of Health in the EU.
  * OECD (2021c) OECD, 2021c.  Latvia: Country Health Profile 2021, State of Health in the EU.
  * OECD (2021d) OECD, 2021d.  Norway: Country Health Profile 2021, State of Health in the EU.
  * OECD (2021e) OECD, 2021e.  OECD Health Statistics 2021.  URL: https://www.oecd.org/health/health-data.htm.
  * OECD (2021f) OECD, 2021f.  Poland: Country Health Profile 2021, State of Health in the EU.
  * Oppio et al. (2018) Oppio, A., Bottero, M., Arcidiacono, A., 2018.  Assessing urban quality: a proposal for a MCDA evaluation framework.  Annals of Operations Research , 1–18doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2738-2.
  * Ortíz et al. (2016) Ortíz, M.A., Cómbita, J.P., Hoz, Á.l.A.D.l., Felice, F.D., Petrillo, A., 2016.  An integrated approach of AHP-DEMATEL methods applied for the selection of allied hospitals in outpatient service.  International Journal of Medical Engineering and Informatics 8, 87–107.
  * Osborn et al. (2016) Osborn, R., Squires, D., Doty, M.M., Sarnak, D.O., Schneider, E.C., 2016.  In new survey of eleven countries, US adults still struggle with access to and affordability of health care.  Health Affairs (Project Hope) 35, 2327–2336.  doi:https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1088.
  * Öztürk et al. (2020) Öztürk, N., Tozan, H., Vayvay, Ö., 2020.  A new decision model approach for health technology assessment and a case study for dialysis alternatives in Turkey.  International journal of environmental research and public health 17, 3608.  doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17103608.
  * Pamučar and Ćirović (2015) Pamučar, D., Ćirović, G., 2015\.  The selection of transport and handling resources in logistics centers using Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area Comparison (MABAC).  Expert systems with applications 42, 3016–3028.  doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2014.11.057.
  * Papanicolas et al. (2008) Papanicolas, I., Smith, P.C., Mossialos, E., 2008.  Principles of performance measurement.  Euro Observer 10, 1–5.
  * Pereira et al. (2020) Pereira, M.A., Machete, I.F., Ferreira, D.C., Marques, R.C., 2020\.  Using multi-criteria decision analysis to rank European health systems: The Beveridgian financing case.  Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 72, 100913.  doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2020.100913.
  * Pianosi et al. (2016) Pianosi, F., Beven, K., Freer, J., Hall, J.W., Rougier, J., Stephenson, D.B., Wagener, T., 2016.  Sensitivity analysis of environmental models: A systematic review with practical workflow.  Environmental Modelling & Software 79, 214–232.  doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.02.008.
  * Pope et al. (2017) Pope, J., Bond, A., Huge, J., Morrison-Saunders, A., 2017.  Reconceptualising sustainability assessment.  Environmental impact assessment review 62, 205–215.  doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2016.11.002.
  * Pope et al. (2015) Pope, J., Bond, A., Morrison-Saunders, A., 2015.  A conceptual framework for sustainability assessment, in: Handbook of sustainability assessment. Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 20–42.  doi:https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783471379.
  * Popescu et al. (2018) Popescu, M.E., Militaru, E., Cristescu, A., Vasilescu, M.D., Maer Matei, M.M., 2018.  Investigating health systems in the European Union: Outcomes and fiscal sustainability.  Sustainability 10, 3186\.  doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093186.
  * Puška et al. (2021) Puška, A., Stević, Ž., Pamučar, D., 2021.  Evaluation and selection of healthcare waste incinerators using extended sustainability criteria and multi-criteria analysis methods.  Environment, Development and Sustainability , 1–31doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01902-2.
  * Rahman et al. (2021) Rahman, H.U., Raza, M., Afsar, P., Alharbi, A., Ahmad, S., Alyami, H., 2021\.  Multi-criteria decision making model for application maintenance offshoring using analytic hierarchy process.  Applied Sciences 11, 8550\.  doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/app11188550.
  * Rajak et al. (2016) Rajak, S., Parthiban, P., Dhanalakshmi, R., 2016.  Sustainable transportation systems performance evaluation using fuzzy logic.  Ecological Indicators 71, 503–513.  doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.07.031.
  * Rezvan et al. (2014) Rezvan, P., Azadnia, A.H., Noordin, M.Y., Seyedi, S.N., 2014\.  Sustainability assessment methodology for concrete manufacturing process: a fuzzy inference system approach, in: Advanced Materials Research, Trans Tech Publ. pp. 814–818.  doi:https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.845.814.
  * Rocha et al. (2021) Rocha, A., Costa, A.S., Figueira, J.R., Ferreira, D.C., Marques, R.C., 2021.  Quality assessment of the Portuguese public hospitals: A multiple criteria approach.  Omega 105, 102505\.  doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2021.102505.
  * Rostamzadeh et al. (2018) Rostamzadeh, R., Ghorabaee, M.K., Govindan, K., Esmaeili, A., Nobar, H.B.K., 2018.  Evaluation of sustainable supply chain risk management using an integrated fuzzy TOPSIS-CRITIC approach.  Journal of Cleaner Production 175, 651–669.  doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.12.071.
  * Saad (2003) Saad, S.G., 2003.  Integrated environmental management for hospitals.  Indoor and built environment 12, 93–98.  doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1420326X03012001015.
  * Sałabun et al. (2020) Sałabun, W., Wątróbski, J., Shekhovtsov, A., 2020.  Are MCDA methods benchmarkable? a comparative study of TOPSIS, VIKOR, COPRAS, and PROMETHEE II methods.  Symmetry 12, 1549\.  doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/sym12091549.
  * Sarkis et al. (2010) Sarkis, J., Gonzalez-Torre, P., Adenso-Diaz, B., 2010.  Stakeholder pressure and the adoption of environmental practices: The mediating effect of training.  Journal of operations Management 28, 163–176.  doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2009.10.001.
  * Sarriot et al. (2004) Sarriot, E.G., Winch, P.J., Ryan, L.J., Bowie, J., Kouletio, M., Swedberg, E., LeBan, K., Edison, J., Welch, R., Pacqué, M.C., 2004\.  A methodological approach and framework for sustainability assessment in NGO-implemented primary health care programs.  The International journal of health planning and management 19, 23–41.  doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/hpm.744.
  * Servadio and Convertino (2018) Servadio, J.L., Convertino, M., 2018\.  Optimal information networks: Application for data-driven integrated health in populations.  Science Advances 4, e1701088.  doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1701088.
  * Seuring and Müller (2008) Seuring, S., Müller, M., 2008\.  From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management.  Journal of cleaner production 16, 1699–1710.  doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.04.020.
  * Seyedmohammadi et al. (2018) Seyedmohammadi, J., Sarmadian, F., Jafarzadeh, A.A., Ghorbani, M.A., Shahbazi, F., 2018.  Application of SAW, TOPSIS and fuzzy TOPSIS models in cultivation priority planning for maize, rapeseed and soybean crops.  Geoderma 310, 178–190.  doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.09.012.
  * Sidhu et al. (2022) Sidhu, A.S., Singh, S., Kumar, R., 2022.  Bibliometric analysis of entropy weights method for multi-objective optimization in machining operations.  Materials Today: Proceedings 50, 1248–1255.  doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.08.132.
  * Singh and Prasher (2019) Singh, A., Prasher, A., 2019\.  Measuring healthcare service quality from patients’ perspective: using Fuzzy AHP application.  Total Quality Management & Business Excellence 30, 284–300.  doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2017.1302794.
  * Singh et al. (2014) Singh, S., Olugu, E.U., Fallahpour, A., 2014.  Fuzzy-based sustainable manufacturing assessment model for SMEs.  Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy 16, 847–860.  doi:10.1007/s10098-013-0676-5.
  * Sneddon et al. (2006) Sneddon, C., Howarth, R.B., Norgaard, R.B., 2006.  Sustainable development in a post-Brundtland world.  Ecological economics 57, 253–268.  doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.04.013.
  * Sotiropoulou and Vavatsikos (2021) Sotiropoulou, K.F., Vavatsikos, A.P., 2021\.  Onshore wind farms GIS-Assisted suitability analysis using PROMETHEE II.  Energy Policy 158, 112531\.  doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112531.
  * Sowada et al. (2019) Sowada, C., Sagan, A., Kowalska-Bobko, I., Badora-Musiał, K., Bochenek, T., Domagała, A., Dubas-Jakóbczyk, K., Kocot, E., Mrożek-Gąsiorowska, M., Sitko, S.J., et al., 2019.  Poland: Health system review.  Health systems in transition 21, 1–234.  URL: https://www.ecoi.net/en/file/local/2014369/18176127-eng.pdf.
  * Stewart and Durbach (2016) Stewart, T.J., Durbach, I., 2016\.  Dealing with uncertainties in MCDA, in: Multiple criteria decision analysis. Springer, pp. 467–496.  doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-3094-4_12.
  * Tello and Baez-Camargo (2015) Tello, J., Baez-Camargo, C., 2015\.  Strengthening health system accountability: a WHO European Region multi-country study.  WHO Regional Office for Europe.  URL: http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/277990/Strengthening-health-systemaccountability-multi-country-study.pdf?ua=1.
  * Torkayesh et al. (2021) Torkayesh, A.E., Pamucar, D., Ecer, F., Chatterjee, P., 2021\.  An integrated BWM-LBWA-CoCoSo framework for evaluation of healthcare sectors in Eastern Europe.  Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 78, 101052.  doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2021.101052.
  * Tuş and Aytaç Adalı (2019) Tuş, A., Aytaç Adalı, E., 2019\.  The new combination with CRITIC and WASPAS methods for the time and attendance software selection problem.  Opsearch 56, 528–538.  doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12597-019-00371-6.
  * UN (2015) UN, 2015.  Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.  URL: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/transformingourworld.
  * Urquhart et al. (2020) Urquhart, R., Kendell, C., Cornelissen, E., Madden, L.L., Powell, B.J., Kissmann, G., Richmond, S.A., Willis, C., Bender, J.L., 2020.  Defining sustainability in practice: views from implementing real-world innovations in health care.  BMC health services research 20, 1–7.  doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-4933-0.
  * Visser and Sunter (2002) Visser, W., Sunter, C., 2002\.  Beyond reasonable greed: why sustainable business is a much better idea!  Cape Town: Human & Rousseau Tafelberg.
  * Vuong et al. (2017) Vuong, Q.H., Vuong, T.T., Ho, T.M., Nguyen, H.V., 2017\.  Psychological and socio-economic factors affecting social sustainability through impacts on perceived health care quality and public health: The case of Vietnam.  Sustainability 9, 1456\.  doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su9081456.
  * Waas et al. (2014) Waas, T., Hugé, J., Block, T., Wright, T., Benitez-Capistros, F., Verbruggen, A., 2014\.  Sustainability assessment and indicators: Tools in a decision-making strategy for sustainable development.  Sustainability 6, 5512–5534.  doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su6095512.
  * Wątróbski et al. (2022a) Wątróbski, J., Bączkiewicz, A., Sałabun, W., 2022a.  pyrepo-mcda-Reference objects based MCDA software package.  SoftwareX 19, 101107\.  doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2022.101107.
  * Wątróbski et al. (2022b) Wątróbski, J., Bączkiewicz, A., Sałabun, W., 2022b.  Version [1.1]–[pyrepo-mcda-Reference objects based MCDA Software Package].  SoftwareX 19, 101197\.  doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.softx.2022.101197.
  * Wątróbski et al. (2019) Wątróbski, J., Jankowski, J., Ziemba, P., Karczmarczyk, A., Zioło, M., 2019.  Generalised framework for multi-criteria method selection.  Omega 86, 107–124.  doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2018.07.004.
  * WCED (1987) WCED, 1987.  World commission on environment and development.  Our common future 17, 1–91.  URL: http://www.ask-force.org/web/Sustainability/Brundtland-Our-Common-Future-1987-2008.pdf.
  * WHO (2000a) WHO, 2000a.  Equity in access to public health-report and documentation of the technical discussions.  Technical Report. WHO Regional Office for South-East Asia.
  * WHO (2000b) WHO, 2000b.  The world health report 2000 – Health systems: improving performance.
  * WHO (2007) WHO, 2007.  Everybody’s business: strengthening health systems to improve health outcomes: WHO’s framework for action.  Production , 1–56.
  * WHO (2010) WHO, 2010.  The world health report: health systems financing: the path to universal coverage: executive summary.  Technical Report. World Health Organization.
  * WHO (2018a) WHO, 2018a.  2018 Global reference list of 100 core health indicators (plus health-related SDGs).  Technical Report. World Health Organization.  URL: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/259951/WHO-HIS-IER-GPM-2018.1-eng.pdf?sequence=1.
  * WHO (2018b) WHO, 2018b.  WHO Patient Safety.  URL: https://www.who.int/patientsafety/about/en/.
  * WHO (2022) WHO, 2022.  Universal health coverage.  URL: https://www.who.int/health-topics/universal-health-coverage#tab=tab_1.
  * WHO (2000c) WHO, I., 2000c.  The world health report 2000. Health systems: improving performance.  Bulletin of the World Health Organization 78, 1064.
  * Yuan et al. (2020) Yuan, J., Zhang, L., Tan, Y., Skibniewski, M.J., 2020.  Evaluating the regional social sustainability contribution of public-private partnerships in China: The development of an indicator system.  Sustainable Development 28, 259–278.  doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2001.
  * Zamora et al. (2021) Zamora, B., Garrison, L.P., Unuigbe, A., Towse, A., 2021\.  Reconciling ACEA and MCDA: is there a way forward for measuring cost-effectiveness in the US healthcare setting?  Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation 19, 1–14.  doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12962-021-00266-8.
  * Zhao et al. (2020) Zhao, D., Li, C., Wang, Q., Yuan, J., 2020.  Comprehensive evaluation of national electric power development based on cloud model and entropy method and TOPSIS: A case study in 11 countries.  Journal of Cleaner Production 277, 123190.  doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123190.
  * Ziemba (2019) Ziemba, P., 2019.  Towards strong sustainability management—A generalized PROSA method.  Sustainability 11, 1555\.  doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061555.
  * Ziemba (2020) Ziemba, P., 2020.  Multi-criteria stochastic selection of electric vehicles for the sustainable development of local government and state administration units in Poland.  Energies 13, 6299\.  doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/en13236299.
  * Ziemba et al. (2017) Ziemba, P., Wątróbski, J., Zioło, M., Karczmarczyk, A., 2017\.  Using the PROSA method in offshore wind farm location problems.  Energies 10, 1755\.  doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/en10111755.
  * Ziout et al. (2013) Ziout, A., Azab, A., Altarazi, S., ElMaraghy, W., 2013\.  Multi-criteria decision support for sustainability assessment of manufacturing system reuse.  CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology 6, 59–69.  doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirpj.2012.10.006.