perspectives and may not adequately consider the diverse cultural contexts in
informal sectors across Africa. Cultural nuances and ethical considerations
may vary significantly, making it challenging to have universal guidelines
that address all cultural intricacies. Informal sectors in Africa often
experience a significant digital divide, with limited access to technology and
digital literacy. MI ethics guidelines may assume a certain level of
technological infrastructure and awareness, making their application
challenging in contexts where such resources are scarce. Many MI ethics
guidelines are presented in languages that may not be accessible or easily
understood by individuals in informal sectors who may have limited proficiency
in official languages or foreign languages. This language barrier poses
challenges in disseminating and implementing ethical principles effectively.
The informal sectors in Africa operate under unique economic dynamics that may
not align with formal economic structures. MI ethics guidelines crafted for
formal settings may not address the specific challenges, needs, and ethical
considerations prevalent in informal economies. Informal sectors often lack
robust regulatory frameworks and oversight. The absence of clear regulations
makes it difficult to enforce MI ethics guidelines, leaving informal workers
and businesses vulnerable to ethical violations without proper accountability
mechanisms. Awareness of MI ethics guidelines may be low in informal sectors
due to limited access to information and educational resources. Individuals
and businesses may not be aware of ethical considerations related to MI,
hindering the adoption of ethical practices. Informal sectors face resource
constraints, limiting their ability to invest in MI technologies that align
with ethical guidelines. Prioritizing ethical considerations may take a
backseat when basic survival and economic challenges are more pressing. Power
imbalances within informal sectors, such as gender and socioeconomic
disparities, may exacerbate ethical challenges. MI ethics guidelines may not
sufficiently address these imbalances, leaving certain groups more vulnerable
to negative impacts of MI technologies. Rapid changes in technology may
outpace the adaptability of MI ethics guidelines in informal sectors.
Guidelines may struggle to keep pace with evolving MI applications, leading to
gaps in addressing emerging ethical issues. Historical and societal factors
may contribute to a trust deficit in certain informal sectors. MI ethics
guidelines may face resistance or skepticism, requiring tailored approaches to
build trust and ensure effective ethical practices.

We look at a 10-row, 7-column table of ethics. We have selected only a few
topics as rows as an illustration of context-sensibility of ethics and the
topics can be complemented. The selected rows are:

  * •

Community Engagement and Communal Values:

  * •

Cultural Sensitivity:

  * •

Environmental Stewardship:

  * •

Social Justice and Equality:

  * •

Healthcare Equity:

  * •

Education Access:

  * •

Economic Inclusivity:

  * •

Technological Ethics:

  * •

Political Accountability:

  * •

Local, Inter-regional and International Collaboration.

And the columns are:

  * •

Individual

  * •

Different Cultures

  * •

Institutions

  * •

Nation:

  * •

On and off-line platforms

  * •

Globally

  * •

Over Time.

###  8.1 MI ethics

Below we breakdown the technological ethics into 60 sub-items: 30 technical MI
ethics and 30 non-technical MI ethics in the African context. Each of the
items layers by the 7-column multimodality.

####  8.1.1  Technical MI ethics

  * •

Fair Algorithmic Design: Ensuring fairness in the technical design of
algorithms to avoid biases and discriminatory outcomes.

  * •

Bias Detection and Mitigation: Developing techniques to identify and address
biases within MI models.

  * •

Explainable MI: Creating MI systems that provide transparent explanations for
their decision-making processes.

  * •

Privacy-Preserving Technologies: Implementing methods to protect individuals’
privacy when handling sensitive data.

  * •

Robustness and Security: Designing MI systems resilient to adversarial attacks
and ensuring cybersecurity measures.

  * •

Accountability in Algorithmic Decision-Making: Establishing mechanisms to hold
MI systems accountable for their decisions.

  * •

Bias-Free Data Collection: Ensuring the collection of diverse and
representative datasets to reduce biases in MI models.

  * •

Ethical Data Governance: Implementing ethical frameworks for the collection,
storage, and usage of data in MI applications.

  * •

Responsible MI Research: Conducting MI research with ethical considerations,
transparency, and social impact in mind.

  * •

Model Fairness Evaluation: Developing metrics and standards to assess the
fairness of MI models.

  * •

Algorithmic Transparency: Making algorithms and decision processes
understandable to stakeholders.

  * •

Algorithmic Accountability: Assigning responsibility for the outcomes of MI
algorithms and decision-making.

  * •

Data Accuracy and Quality: Ensuring high-quality and accurate data inputs for
MI models.

  * •

Human-Centric Design: Prioritizing the needs and well-being of humans in the
design of MI systems.

  * •

Human-in-the-Loop Systems: Integrating human oversight and decision-making
into MI processes.

  * •

Ethical Use of MI in Research: Ensuring that MI technologies are used
ethically in academic and industrial research.

  * •

Continuous Monitoring and Auditing: Regularly assessing MI systems for ethical
compliance and performance.

  * •

Adversarial Robustness: Developing MI models that resist adversarial attempts
to manipulate their behavior.

  * •

Fairness in Feature Engineering: Ensuring fairness in the selection and use of
features in MI models.

  * •

Secure Model Deployment: Implementing secure and ethical practices when
deploying MI models.

  * •

Algorithmic Impact Assessment: Evaluating the potential impact of algorithms
on various stakeholders.

  * •

Interpretability of Predictions: Making MI predictions interpretable and
understandable to end-users.

  * •

Bias-Aware Machine Learning: Incorporating awareness of bias in machine
learning processes.

  * •

MI System Reliability: Ensuring the reliability and consistency of MI systems
in diverse scenarios.

  * •

Energy Efficiency: Developing MI models and algorithms that are
environmentally sustainable.

  * •

Safety Mechanisms in Autonomous Systems: Implementing safety features in AI-
powered autonomous systems.

  * •

Model Update Ethics: Addressing ethical considerations when updating MI models
over time.

  * •

Ethical Use of MI in Healthcare: Ensuring responsible deployment of MI
technologies in medical settings.

  * •

Cross-Cultural MI Understanding: Adapting MI systems to understand and respect
diverse cultural contexts.

  * •

Secure Federated Learning: Ensuring the security and privacy of federated
learning processes.

####  8.1.2  Non-technical MI ethics

  * •

Informed Consent: Ensuring individuals are adequately informed and consent to
the use of MI technologies.

  * •

Ethical Governance: Establishing ethical guidelines and policies for the
responsible development and deployment of MI.

  * •

Social Impact Assessment: Evaluating the broader societal impact of MI
technologies before deployment.

  * •

Inclusivity and Diversity: Promoting diversity in MI development teams and
considering diverse perspectives in MI applications.

  * •

Global Collaboration on MI Ethics: Fostering international cooperation to
address global MI ethical challenges.

  * •

Human Rights Protection: Safeguarding human rights in the development and
deployment of MI systems.

  * •

Ethical Education and Awareness: Promoting awareness and education on MI
ethics for stakeholders and the general public.

  * •

Cultural Sensitivity: Adapting MI technologies to respect and align with
diverse cultural norms and values.

  * •

Dual-Use Technology Awareness: Recognizing the potential dual-use nature of MI
technologies and implementing safeguards.

  * •

Public Participation: Involving the public in decision-making processes
related to MI technologies to ensure inclusivity and representation.

  * •

Ethical Impact on Employment: Addressing the ethical implications of MI on
employment and workforce dynamics.

  * •

Responsible MI Procurement: Considering ethical factors when procuring MI
technologies for public or private use.

  * •

Community Engagement: Engaging with local communities to understand and
address their concerns about MI technologies.

  * •

MI and Democratic Values: Ensuring that MI technologies align with democratic
principles and values.

  * •

User Empowerment: Empowering users to have control over their data and MI
interactions.

  * •

Digital Divide Reduction: Implementing strategies to bridge the digital divide
and ensure equitable access to MI benefits.

  * •

Fair Distribution of MI Benefits: Ensuring that the benefits of MI
technologies are distributed equitably across society.

  * •

Long-Term Environmental Sustainability: Assessing and mitigating the
environmental impact of MI technologies.

  * •

Ethical Marketing and Advertising: Ensuring ethical practices in the marketing
and advertising of MI products and services.

  * •

Responsible MI Journalism: Ethically reporting on MI developments and ensuring
accuracy and transparency.

  * •

MI and Accessibility: Designing MI systems that are accessible to individuals
with diverse abilities.

  * •

MI and Cultural Heritage Preservation: Safeguarding cultural heritage in the
development and deployment of MI technologies.

  * •

Human-MI Collaboration Ethics: Establishing ethical guidelines for
collaborative interactions between humans and MI systems.

  * •

MI Impact on Social Equality: Considering and addressing the potential impact
of MI on social equality.

  * •

Algorithmic Accountability in Government: Ensuring accountability for MI use
in governmental decision-making.

  * •

Elderly and Vulnerable Population Protection: Safeguarding the rights and
well-being of elderly and vulnerable populations in MI applications.

  * •

Ethical MI Policy Development: Creating policies that consider the ethical
implications of MI technologies.

  * •

Cross-Industry Collaboration: Encouraging collaboration between different
industries to address common MI ethical challenges.

  * •

MI and Child Protection: Implementing measures to protect children’s privacy
and well-being in MI applications.

  * •

MI for Social Good: Promoting the use of MI technologies for positive social
impact and humanitarian causes.

Tables 55, 56 and 57 display some examples of technical MI ethics. Tables 58,
59 and 60 display some examples of non-technical MI ethics.

Individuals |  Cultures |  Developers |  Institutions |  Nation |  Platforms |  Globally |  Over Time
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---
Fair Algorithmic Design |  Cultural diversity influences algorithm fairness |  Developer responsibility in ethical MI |  Institutional policies guide ethical MI |  National regulations on MI ethics |  Platform-specific ethical guidelines |  Global collaborations for ethical MI |  Ethical considerations evolve over time
Bias Detection and Mitigation |  Identifying and correcting algorithmic biases |  Developer tools for bias detection |  Institutional strategies for bias mitigation |  National initiatives to address bias |  Platform-specific bias handling mechanisms |  Global efforts to mitigate biases in MI |  Ethical norms adapt as biases change
Explainable MI |  Transparent algorithms for user understanding |  Developer emphasis on explainable models |  Institutional push for transparent MI systems |  National demand for understandable MI |  Platform commitment to explainability |  Global standards for MI transparency |  Ethical importance of explainability grows
Privacy-Preserving Technologies |  Individual privacy prioritized in MI systems |  Developer implementation of privacy-preserving techniques |  Institutional safeguards for user privacy |  National laws protecting individual privacy |  Platform-specific privacy measures |  Global consensus on MI privacy standards |  Ethical concerns over MI and privacy persist
Robustness and Security |  Ensuring MI systems are robust against adversarial attacks |  Developer focus on building secure MI models |  Institutional measures for MI system robustness |  National security regulations for MI applications |  Platform-specific security protocols |  Global collaboration for MI security standards |  Ethical implications of MI vulnerabilities
Accountability in Algorithmic Decision-Making |  Holding individuals accountable for MI decisions |  Developer responsibility in algorithmic choices |  Institutional frameworks for MI decision accountability |  National guidelines for accountable MI decisions |  Platform-specific accountability mechanisms |  Global efforts for accountable MI practices |  Ethical considerations of decision responsibility
Bias-Free Data Collection |  Ensuring unbiased data collection practices |  Developer commitment to unbiased data gathering |  Institutional guidelines for bias-free data collection |  National regulations on fair data collection |  Platform-specific data ethics policies |  Global consensus on bias-free data practices |  Ethical importance of unbiased data collection
Ethical Data Governance |  Ethical management and use of data |  Developer adherence to ethical data practices |  Institutional policies for ethical data governance |  National frameworks for responsible data use |  Platform-specific data governance standards |  Global collaboration on ethical data management |  Evolving ethical norms in data governance
Responsible MI Research |  Ethical considerations in machine learning research |  Developer commitment to responsible MI research |  Institutional support for ethical research practices |  National funding for responsible MI research |  Platform-specific research ethics guidelines |  Global initiatives for responsible MI research |  Ethical challenges in advancing MI research
Model Fairness Evaluation |  Evaluating models for fairness and impartiality |  Developer tools for model fairness assessment |  Institutional frameworks for model fairness evaluation |  National standards for fair MI models |  Platform-specific fairness evaluation practices |  Global benchmarks for model fairness |  Ethical scrutiny in assessing model fairness
Table 55: Some Examples of Technical MI Ethics 1 Algorithmic Transparency |  Openness in algorithmic processes |  Developer commitment to transparent algorithms |  Institutional push for algorithmic transparency |  National regulations on algorithmic transparency |  Platform-specific transparency measures |  Global standards for algorithmic openness |  Ethical importance of transparency in algorithms
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---
Algorithmic Accountability |  Holding algorithms accountable for their impact |  Developer responsibility in algorithmic outcomes |  Institutional frameworks for algorithmic accountability |  National guidelines for accountable algorithms |  Platform-specific accountability measures |  Global efforts for algorithmic responsibility |  Ethical considerations in holding algorithms accountable
Data Accuracy and Quality |  Ensuring accuracy and quality in data used for MI |  Developer focus on accurate and high-quality data |  Institutional standards for data accuracy |  National regulations on data quality for MI |  Platform-specific data quality measures |  Global consensus on data accuracy in MI |  Ethical implications of inaccurate data
Human-Centric Design |  Designing MI systems with a focus on human needs |  Developer emphasis on human-centered MI design |  Institutional encouragement of human-centric MI |  National support for human-focused MI development |  Platform commitment to human-centric design |  Global initiatives for MI systems aligned with human values |  Ethical considerations in human-centric MI
Human-in-the-Loop Systems |  Integrating human input in MI decision-making |  Developer implementation of human-in-the-loop systems |  Institutional support for human involvement in MI processes |  National guidelines for human-in-the-loop MI |  Platform-specific mechanisms for human-in-the-loop MI |  Global standards for human-in-the-loop MI systems |  Ethical importance of human involvement in MI
Ethical Use of MI in Research |  Ethical considerations in the use of MI in research |  Developer commitment to ethically using MI in research |  Institutional guidelines for the ethical use of MI in research |  National frameworks for responsible MI research use |  Platform-specific ethics in MI research practices |  Global initiatives for ethical use of MI in research |  Evolving ethical norms in MI research use
Continuous Monitoring and Auditing |  Regular monitoring and auditing of MI systems |  Developer practices for continuous MI system evaluation |  Institutional frameworks for MI system monitoring |  National regulations on continuous MI system auditing |  Platform-specific monitoring and auditing measures |  Global standards for MI system evaluation |  Ethical implications of continuous monitoring and auditing
Adversarial Robustness |  Building MI systems resilient to adversarial attacks |  Developer focus on adversarial robustness in MI models |  Institutional measures for adversarial resilience in MI |  National guidelines for adversarial robustness in MI applications |  Platform-specific defenses against adversarial attacks |  Global collaboration for adversarial robustness in MI |  Ethical considerations in addressing adversarial vulnerabilities
Fairness in Feature Engineering |  Ensuring fairness in the selection of features for MI models |  Developer attention to fairness in feature engineering |  Institutional guidelines for fair feature selection |  National regulations on fairness in feature engineering |  Platform-specific fairness considerations in feature engineering |  Global consensus on fairness in MI feature selection |  Ethical implications of biased feature engineering
Secure Model Deployment |  Ensuring secure deployment of MI models |  Developer practices for secure model deployment |  Institutional measures for secure MI model deployment |  National guidelines for secure MI model deployment |  Platform-specific security protocols for model deployment |  Global standards for secure MI model deployment |  Ethical considerations in secure model deployment
Table 56: Some Examples of Technical MI Ethics 2 Algorithmic Impact Assessment |  Assessing societal impact of algorithms |  Developer tools for impact assessment |  Institutional frameworks for algorithmic impact evaluation |  National guidelines for algorithmic impact assessment |  Platform-specific impact assessment practices |  Global standards for algorithmic societal impact assessment |  Ethical implications in assessing algorithmic impact
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---
Interpretability of Predictions |  Making MI predictions interpretable |  Developer focus on interpretable prediction models |  Institutional encouragement of interpretable MI predictions |  National support for interpretable MI predictions |  Platform-specific interpretable prediction mechanisms |  Global standards for interpretable MI predictions |  Ethical considerations in prediction interpretability
Bias-Aware Machine Learning |  Developing MI models with awareness of biases |  Developer emphasis on bias-aware ML models |  Institutional guidelines for bias-aware machine learning |  National regulations on bias-aware machine learning |  Platform-specific mechanisms for addressing biases in ML |  Global collaboration for bias-aware ML practices |  Ethical considerations in developing MI models with bias awareness
MI System Reliability |  Ensuring reliability in MI systems |  Developer practices for reliable MI models |  Institutional measures for MI system reliability |  National standards for reliable MI applications |  Platform-specific reliability assurance |  Global standards for MI system reliability |  Ethical implications of unreliable MI systems
Energy Efficiency |  Developing energy-efficient MI solutions |  Developer focus on MI models with low energy consumption |  Institutional encouragement of energy-efficient MI |  National support for eco-friendly MI technologies |  Platform-specific energy efficiency measures |  Global initiatives for energy-efficient MI |  Ethical considerations in MI’s environmental impact
Safety Mechanisms in Autonomous Systems |  Implementing safety measures in autonomous MI systems |  Developer incorporation of safety mechanisms in autonomy |  Institutional frameworks for safety in autonomous systems |  National regulations on safety in autonomous MI |  Platform-specific safety protocols for autonomy |  Global collaboration on safety standards in autonomous MI |  Ethical implications of safety in autonomous systems
Model Update Ethics |  Ethical considerations in updating MI models |  Developer commitment to ethical model updates |  Institutional guidelines for ethical model updates |  National frameworks for responsible model updates |  Platform-specific ethical considerations in model updates |  Global initiatives for ethical model updates |  Evolving ethical norms in updating MI models
Ethical Use of MI in Healthcare |  Ethical considerations in deploying MI in healthcare |  Developer commitment to ethical use of MI in health applications |  Institutional guidelines for ethical use of MI in healthcare |  National regulations on ethical MI in healthcare |  Platform-specific ethics in MI for healthcare |  Global initiatives for ethical use of MI in healthcare |  Evolving ethical norms in MI’s role in healthcare
Cross-Cultural MI Understanding |  Ensuring cultural understanding in MI models |  Developer focus on cross-cultural MI models |  Institutional support for cross-cultural MI understanding |  National encouragement of culturally-aware MI |  Platform-specific measures for cross-cultural MI |  Global collaboration for culturally-sensitive MI |  Ethical considerations in cross-cultural MI understanding
Secure Federated Learning |  Ensuring security in federated learning setups |  Developer practices for secure federated learning |  Institutional measures for secure federated MI |  National guidelines for secure federated learning |  Platform-specific security protocols for federated MI |  Global standards for secure federated learning |  Ethical implications of security in federated MI
Table 57: Some examples of Technical MI Ethics 3 Individuals |  Cultures |  Developers |  Institutions |  Nation |  Platforms |  Globally |  Over Time
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---
Informed Consent |  Individuals making informed decisions in MI use |  Developer communication of MI implications |  Institutional practices for informed consent |  National laws on informed consent for MI |  Platform-specific consent mechanisms |  Global standards for MI informed consent |  Changing norms in MI informed decision-making
Ethical Governance |  Ethical decision-making at governance levels |  Developer adherence to ethical governance principles |  Institutional frameworks for ethical governance |  National policies on MI ethical governance |  Platform-specific ethical governance structures |  Global collaboration on MI ethical governance |  Evolving ethical governance norms
Social Impact Assessment |  Assessing societal impact of MI implementations |  Developer tools for social impact assessment |  Institutional frameworks for MI social impact assessment |  National guidelines for assessing MI’s societal impact |  Platform-specific impact assessment practices |  Global standards for MI social impact assessment |  Ethical considerations in assessing MI’s societal impact
Inclusivity and Diversity |  Ensuring inclusivity and diversity in MI use |  Developer focus on inclusive and diverse MI models |  Institutional support for inclusive MI practices |  National encouragement of diverse MI applications |  Platform-specific measures for inclusivity and diversity |  Global collaboration for diverse MI |  Ethical considerations in promoting inclusivity and diversity
Global Collaboration on MI Ethics |  Collaborating globally on ethical MI standards |  Developer engagement in global MI ethics discussions |  Institutional support for international MI ethics collaborations |  National involvement in global MI ethics initiatives |  Platform-specific global collaboration mechanisms |  Worldwide cooperation on MI ethics |  Evolving global ethical norms in MI
Human Rights Protection |  Protecting human rights in MI use |  Developer commitment to human rights in MI applications |  Institutional safeguards for MI and human rights |  National laws on MI and human rights protection |  Platform-specific human rights considerations |  Global standards for MI and human rights |  Ethical considerations in protecting human rights in MI
Ethical Education and Awareness |  Promoting ethical MI education |  Developer emphasis on ethical MI education |  Institutional support for MI ethics education |  National initiatives for ethical MI education |  Platform-specific educational programs on MI ethics |  Global efforts for MI ethics education |  Evolving ethical education norms in MI
Cultural Sensitivity |  Ensuring cultural sensitivity in MI models |  Developer focus on culturally-sensitive MI models |  Institutional encouragement of culturally-aware MI |  National support for culturally-sensitive MI applications |  Platform-specific measures for cultural sensitivity in MI |  Global collaboration for culturally-sensitive MI |  Ethical considerations in cultural sensitivity in MI
Dual-Use Technology Awareness |  Raising awareness of dual-use MI technologies |  Developer consideration of dual-use implications |  Institutional frameworks for dual-use MI awareness |  National regulations on dual-use MI applications |  Platform-specific dual-use technology guidelines |  Global collaboration on dual-use MI awareness |  Ethical implications of dual-use MI technologies
Public Participation |  Involving the public in MI decision-making |  Developer practices for public involvement in MI |  Institutional frameworks for public participation in MI |  National guidelines for public engagement in MI |  Platform-specific mechanisms for public involvement |  Global standards for public participation in MI |  Ethical considerations in public engagement in MI
Table 58: Some Examples of Non-Technical MI Ethics 1 Ethical Impact on Employment |  Considering ethical impact on employment in MI |  Developer awareness of employment implications |  Institutional frameworks for ethical employment impact |  National policies on MI’s ethical impact on employment |  Platform-specific considerations for ethical employment impact |  Global collaboration on ethical employment impact |  Evolving ethical norms in MI’s impact on employment
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---
Responsible MI Procurement |  Ethical considerations in MI system procurement |  Developer commitment to responsible MI procurement |  Institutional guidelines for ethical MI procurement |  National standards for responsible MI system acquisition |  Platform-specific considerations in MI procurement |  Global initiatives for responsible MI procurement |  Evolving norms in ethical MI procurement
Community Engagement |  Engaging with communities in MI development |  Developer practices for community engagement in MI |  Institutional frameworks for community involvement in MI |  National policies on community engagement in MI |  Platform-specific community engagement mechanisms |  Global standards for MI community involvement |  Ethical considerations in community engagement
MI and Democratic Values |  Upholding democratic values in MI applications |  Developer adherence to democratic principles in MI |  Institutional support for democratic MI practices |  National laws on MI and democratic values |  Platform-specific democratic MI considerations |  Global collaboration on democratic MI standards |  Evolving norms in MI’s alignment with democratic values
User Empowerment |  Empowering users in MI interactions |  Developer focus on empowering users in MI systems |  Institutional support for user empowerment in MI |  National guidelines for user empowerment in MI |  Platform-specific mechanisms for user empowerment |  Global standards for MI user empowerment |  Ethical considerations in user empowerment in MI
Digital Divide Reduction |  Reducing digital divides with ethical MI |  Developer efforts to address digital inequalities |  Institutional strategies for reducing the digital divide |  National policies on digital divide reduction through MI |  Platform-specific measures for digital divide reduction |  Global collaboration on MI for digital divide reduction |  Ethical implications of MI in addressing digital disparities
Fair Distribution of MI Benefits |  Ensuring fair distribution of MI benefits |  Developer consideration of benefit distribution in MI |  Institutional frameworks for fair benefit distribution |  National policies on equitable MI benefits |  Platform-specific mechanisms for fair MI benefit distribution |  Global collaboration for equitable MI benefits |  Ethical considerations in MI benefit distribution
Long-Term Environmental Sustainability |  Considering long-term environmental impact in MI |  Developer awareness of MI’s environmental footprint |  Institutional frameworks for sustainable MI practices |  National regulations on MI and environmental sustainability |  Platform-specific measures for environmentally sustainable MI |  Global collaboration on MI’s environmental impact |  Ethical implications of MI’s environmental footprint
Ethical Marketing and Advertising |  Ethical considerations in MI marketing |  Developer practices for ethical MI advertising |  Institutional guidelines for ethical MI marketing |  National standards for responsible MI promotion |  Platform-specific ethical marketing in MI |  Global initiatives for ethical MI advertising |  Evolving norms in MI marketing ethics
Responsible MI Journalism |  Ethical considerations in reporting on MI |  Developer commitment to responsible MI journalism |  Institutional guidelines for ethical reporting on MI |  National standards for journalism on MI |  Platform-specific responsible MI reporting practices |  Global collaboration on ethical MI journalism |  Evolving norms in MI journalism ethics
Table 59:  Some examples of Non-Technical MI Ethics 2 MI and Accessibility |  Ensuring accessibility in MI applications |  Developer focus on accessible MI models |  Institutional support for accessible MI practices |  National regulations on MI accessibility |  Platform-specific measures for MI accessibility |  Global collaboration for accessible MI |  Ethical considerations in MI accessibility
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---
MI and Cultural Heritage Preservation |  Ethical considerations in preserving cultural heritage with MI |  Developer practices for culturally-sensitive MI in heritage preservation |  Institutional frameworks for ethical cultural heritage MI |  National guidelines for preserving cultural heritage with MI |  Platform-specific cultural heritage MI considerations |  Global collaboration on MI for cultural heritage preservation |  Evolving norms in MI’s role in cultural heritage
Human-MI Collaboration Ethics |  Ethical considerations in human-MI collaborations |  Developer commitment to ethical human-MI collaboration |  Institutional guidelines for ethical human-MI partnerships |  National policies on ethical MI collaboration with humans |  Platform-specific ethics in human-MI cooperation |  Global standards for ethical human-MI collaboration |  Evolving norms in MI’s interaction with humans
MI Impact on Social Equality |  Considering social equality in MI impact |  Developer awareness of MI’s impact on social equality |  Institutional frameworks for assessing MI’s impact on social equality |  National policies on MI and social equality |  Platform-specific measures for promoting social equality in MI |  Global collaboration on MI’s impact on social equality |  Ethical implications of MI’s influence on social equality
Algorithmic Accountability in Government |  Holding government algorithms accountable |  Developer practices for accountable government algorithms |  Institutional frameworks for algorithmic accountability in government |  National regulations on MI accountability in government |  Platform-specific mechanisms for accountable government algorithms |  Global collaboration on accountable government MI |  Ethical considerations in government algorithm accountability
Elderly and Vulnerable Population Protection |  Protecting elderly and vulnerable populations in MI |  Developer consideration of MI’s impact on vulnerable populations |  Institutional safeguards for elderly and vulnerable individuals in MI use |  National guidelines for protecting vulnerable populations with MI |  Platform-specific measures for safeguarding vulnerable populations |  Global collaboration on MI protection for vulnerable individuals |  Ethical implications of MI’s influence on elderly and vulnerable populations
Ethical MI Policy Development |  Ethical considerations in MI policy creation |  Developer commitment to ethical MI policy development |  Institutional guidelines for ethical MI policy formulation |  National policies on creating ethical MI frameworks |  Platform-specific ethical MI policy development |  Global collaboration on ethical MI policy creation |  Evolving norms in MI policy development ethics
Cross-Industry Collaboration and Coopetition |  Collaborating across industries for ethical MI |  Developer engagement in cross-industry MI collaborations |  Institutional support for ethical collaboration and coopetition in MI |  National encouragement of cross-industry MI partnerships |  Platform-specific mechanisms for cross-industry MI collaboration |  Global standards for cross-industry MI coopetition |  Ethical implications of MI collaboration across industries
MI and Child Protection |  Ensuring child protection in MI applications |  Developer focus on child-safe MI models |  Institutional support for MI applications ensuring child safety |  National regulations on MI and child protection |  Platform-specific measures for child-safe MI |  Global collaboration on MI for child protection |  Ethical considerations in MI’s impact on child safety
MI for Social Good |  Promoting MI for positive social impact |  Developer commitment to using MI for social good |  Institutional frameworks for MI applications benefiting society |  National policies on MI for social good |  Platform-specific initiatives for MI’s positive social impact |  Global collaboration on MI for social good |  Evolving norms in MI’s role for societal benefit
Table 60:  Some examples of Non-Technical MI Ethics 3

###  8.2  Rows: Selected ethics topics

####  Community Engagement and Communal Values

  * •

Individual: Active participation and collaboration within local communities,
emphasizing shared values, traditional practices, and community development.

  * •

Different Cultures: Respect for diverse ethnic, linguistic, and cultural
identities, fostering unity and cooperation while preserving and celebrating
unique cultural expressions.

  * •

Institutions: Support for community-based institutions that uphold communal
values, ensuring their integration into broader societal frameworks and
decision-making processes.

  * •

Nation: National policies promoting community engagement, preserving cultural
heritage, and recognizing the importance of communal values in shaping the
nation’s identity.

  * •

Globally: Collaboration with global entities while maintaining a strong
connection to African cultural values, contributing to a more inclusive and
culturally sensitive global community.

  * •

Over Time: Preservation and adaptation of communal values over generations,
acknowledging their historical significance and evolving in harmony with
changing societal needs.

####  Cultural Sensitivity

  * •

Individual: Personal awareness and respect for the rich tapestry of African
cultures, promoting inclusive attitudes and fostering cross-cultural
understanding in daily interactions.

  * •

Different Cultures: Encouragement of cultural exchange, dialogue, and mutual
appreciation among diverse African cultures, emphasizing the importance of
preserving cultural heritage.

  * •

Institutions: Integration of cultural sensitivity into institutional policies,
ensuring fair representation and equitable treatment of individuals from
various cultural backgrounds.

  * •

Nation: National efforts to protect and promote cultural diversity,
recognizing the intrinsic value of each culture in contributing to the
nation’s identity.

  * •

Globally: Advocacy for global recognition and respect of African cultures,
challenging stereotypes and fostering a positive image of Africa on the global
stage.

  * •

Over Time: Preservation of cultural heritage and adaptation to contemporary
contexts, allowing cultural traditions to evolve while maintaining their
authenticity.

####  Environmental Stewardship

  * •

Individual: Sustainable practices and environmental awareness at the
individual level, emphasizing the importance of preserving Africa’s diverse
ecosystems and natural resources.

  * •

Different Cultures: Incorporation of traditional ecological knowledge into
environmental conservation efforts, recognizing the symbiotic relationship
between African cultures and nature.

  * •

Institutions: Implementation of policies that prioritize environmental
sustainability, considering the impact on local ecosystems and ensuring
responsible resource management.

  * •

Nation: National strategies for environmental protection, addressing
challenges like deforestation, wildlife conservation, and climate change
adaptation in the African context.

  * •

Globally: Collaboration on global environmental initiatives, advocating for
equitable representation and acknowledging Africa’s role in the global
ecological balance.

  * •

Over Time: Long-term environmental planning, balancing development with
conservation to secure a sustainable and thriving environment for future
generations.

####  Social Justice and Equality

  * •

Individual: Advocacy for social justice, equality, and human rights at the
individual level, addressing issues like gender inequality, discrimination,
and social disparities.

  * •

Different Cultures: Recognition and celebration of diversity, promoting
inclusive social structures that respect and uphold the rights of individuals
from various cultural backgrounds.

  * •

Institutions: Development and implementation of policies that combat social
injustices, ensuring equal opportunities and fair representation within
societal institutions.

  * •

Nation: National commitment to social justice, actively addressing historical
inequalities and working towards a more inclusive and equitable society.

  * •

Globally: Participation in global movements for social justice, challenging
systemic inequalities on the international stage and advocating for Africa’s
interests.

  * •

Over Time: Ongoing efforts to eradicate social injustices, acknowledging
historical challenges and working towards a more just and equal future.

####  Healthcare Equity

  * •

Individual: Access to healthcare education and proactive engagement in
personal health practices, promoting preventive measures and awareness within
local communities.

  * •

Different Cultures: Integration of culturally sensitive healthcare practices,
recognizing traditional healing methods and addressing healthcare disparities
in diverse cultural contexts.

  * •

Institutions: Development of healthcare policies that prioritize equity,
ensuring equal access to quality healthcare services for all citizens.

  * •

Nation: National healthcare strategies that address public health challenges,
emphasizing universal access to healthcare and reducing health inequalities.

  * •

Globally: Collaboration on global health initiatives, advocating for fair
distribution of resources and acknowledging Africa’s contributions to global
health.

  * •

Over Time: Progress in healthcare infrastructure and services, adapting to
evolving health needs and ensuring continuous improvement in healthcare
equity.

####  Education Access

  * •

Individual: Pursuit of education and lifelong learning, emphasizing the value
of knowledge and skills to empower individuals and contribute to community
development.

  * •

Different Cultures: Recognition of diverse learning styles and educational
approaches, fostering an inclusive education system that respects various
cultural perspectives.

  * •

Institutions: Implementation of inclusive educational policies, ensuring equal
access to quality education for individuals from different cultural
backgrounds.

  * •

Nation: National commitment to education as a key driver of development,
investing in educational infrastructure and promoting access for all citizens.

  * •

Globally: Engagement in international collaborations on educational
initiatives, contributing African perspectives to global education
discussions.

  * •

Over Time: Evolution of education systems to meet changing needs, adapting to
technological advancements and ensuring education remains a cornerstone of
societal progress.

####  Economic Inclusivity

  * •

Individual: Entrepreneurship, financial literacy, and economic empowerment at
the individual level, fostering economic independence and community
development.

  * •

Different Cultures: Recognition and integration of diverse economic models,
acknowledging the richness of various African economic practices and promoting
inclusive economic policies.

  * •

Institutions: Implementation of policies that promote economic inclusivity,
ensuring fair distribution of resources and opportunities within the national
economic framework.

  * •

Nation: National strategies for inclusive economic development, addressing
economic disparities and fostering economic resilience.

  * •

Globally: Engagement in global economic collaborations, advocating for fair
representation and acknowledging Africa’s potential in shaping global economic
landscapes.

  * •

Over Time: Adaptation of economic strategies to evolving global markets,
balancing traditional economic practices with innovative approaches for
sustainable economic inclusivity.

####  Technological Ethics

  * •

Individual: Ethical use of technology, digital literacy, and participation in
technological advancements, recognizing the role of technology in shaping the
African narrative.

  * •

Different Cultures: Integration of diverse perspectives into technological
innovation, ensuring that technological solutions consider the cultural
context and benefit diverse communities.

  * •

Institutions: Development of ethical guidelines for technology use, fostering
responsible innovation and addressing potential ethical challenges in
technological advancements.

  * •

Nation: National policies that promote responsible and inclusive technology
development, bridging the digital divide and ensuring equitable access to
technological benefits.

  * •

Globally: Participation in global discussions on technological ethics,
advocating for fair representation and ethical considerations that address
Africa’s unique challenges and opportunities.

  * •

Over Time: Ethical adaptation to technological advancements, recognizing the
evolving role of technology in African societies and ensuring its alignment
with ethical principles over time.

####  Political Accountability

  * •

Individual: Civic engagement, political awareness, and active participation at
the individual level, fostering a sense of responsibility and accountability
in governance.

  * •

Different Cultures: Recognition of diverse political perspectives, promoting
inclusive political discourse that considers cultural nuances and diverse
voices.

  * •

Institutions: Development of transparent and accountable political systems,
ensuring representation and responsiveness to the needs of diverse cultural
and social groups.

  * •

Nation: National commitment to political accountability, addressing
corruption, promoting transparency, and ensuring fair and inclusive political
processes that respect the diverse cultural and social fabric of the nation.

  * •

Globally: Active engagement in international political collaborations,
contributing African perspectives to global governance discussions, and
advocating for fair representation on the global stage.

  * •

Over Time: Evolution of political systems that adapt to changing societal
needs, acknowledging historical challenges, and continuously working towards
accountable and inclusive governance over time.

####  Local, Inter-regional, and International Collaboration

  * •

Individual: Promotion of collaboration at the local level, emphasizing
community engagement and fostering partnerships for community development.

  * •

Different Cultures: Integration of diverse cultural perspectives in
collaborative initiatives, recognizing the richness of cultural diversity in
shaping collaborative efforts.

  * •

Institutions: Development of policies that facilitate inter-regional and
international collaboration, ensuring equitable participation and mutual
benefit.

  * •

Nation: National strategies for diplomatic collaboration, promoting Africa’s
interests on the international stage while respecting the diversity of African
nations.

  * •

Globally: Active engagement in global collaborations, contributing African
perspectives to international discussions and fostering partnerships that
address global challenges.

  * •

Over Time: Adaptation of collaboration strategies to changing global dynamics,
recognizing historical collaborations and continuously working towards more
effective and inclusive collaborative efforts over time.

In the African context, each of these rows emphasizes the unique challenges,
opportunities, and values that contribute to the multifaceted MI ethical
landscape. The interconnectedness of these aspects reflects the dynamic and
evolving nature of MI ethics in Africa, where the preservation of cultural
identity, environmental sustainability, social justice, and inclusive economic
development are integral components of MI ethical considerations across
various scales and over time.

###  8.3  Columns: MI Ethics from individuals to the globe level

####  Individual

  * •

Community Engagement and Communal Values: Personal commitment to actively
participate in and contribute to local communities, emphasizing shared values
and collaborative initiatives for community development.

  * •

Cultural Sensitivity: Personal awareness and respect for the diverse cultures
within Africa, fostering an inclusive attitude that appreciates and celebrates
the richness of cultural identities.

  * •

Environmental Stewardship: Individual responsibility for sustainable
practices, including ecological awareness and a commitment to preserving
Africa’s diverse ecosystems and natural resources.

  * •

Social Justice and Equality: Personal advocacy for social justice, human
rights, and equality, addressing issues like gender inequality,
discrimination, and socioeconomic disparities.

  * •

Healthcare Equity: Commitment to personal health practices and proactive
engagement in healthcare education, contributing to equitable access to
healthcare services.

  * •

Education Access: Pursuit of education and lifelong learning, recognizing the
transformative power of education in personal and community development.

  * •

Economic Inclusivity: Individual initiatives in entrepreneurship, financial
literacy, and economic empowerment, fostering economic independence and
community resilience.

  * •

Technological Ethics: Ethical use of technology, digital literacy, and
responsible participation in technological advancements, considering the
impact of technology on African societies.

  * •

Political Accountability: Civic engagement, political awareness, and active
participation at the individual level, contributing to transparent and
accountable political processes.

  * •

Local, Inter-regional, and International Collaboration: Promotion of
collaboration at the local level, emphasizing community engagement and
fostering partnerships for community development.

####  Different Cultures

  * •

Community Engagement and Communal Values: Embracing and integrating diverse
cultural practices within local communities, promoting unity while respecting
unique cultural expressions.

  * •

Cultural Sensitivity: Encouraging cultural exchange, dialogue, and mutual
appreciation among diverse African cultures, fostering cross-cultural
understanding and harmony.

  * •

Environmental Stewardship: Incorporating traditional ecological knowledge into
environmental conservation efforts, recognizing the symbiotic relationship
between African cultures and nature.

  * •

Social Justice and Equality: Recognition and celebration of diversity,
promoting inclusive social structures that respect and uphold the rights of
individuals from various cultural backgrounds.

  * •

Healthcare Equity: Integration of culturally sensitive healthcare practices,
acknowledging traditional healing methods and addressing healthcare
disparities in diverse cultural contexts.

  * •

Education Access: Recognition of diverse learning styles and educational
approaches, fostering an inclusive education system that respects various
cultural perspectives.

  * •

Economic Inclusivity: Acknowledgment and integration of diverse economic
models, ensuring that economic policies consider the richness of various
African economic practices.

  * •

Technological Ethics: Integration of diverse perspectives into technological
innovation, ensuring that technological solutions consider the cultural
context and benefit diverse communities.

  * •

Political Accountability: Recognition of diverse political perspectives,
promoting inclusive political discourse that considers cultural nuances and
diverse voices.

  * •

Local, Inter-regional, and International Collaboration: Integration of diverse
cultural perspectives in collaborative initiatives, recognizing the richness
of cultural diversity in shaping collaborative efforts.

####  Institutions

  * •

Community Engagement and Communal Values: Support for community-based
institutions that uphold communal values, ensuring their integration into
broader societal frameworks and decision-making processes.

  * •

Cultural Sensitivity: Integration of cultural sensitivity into institutional
policies, ensuring fair representation and equitable treatment of individuals
from various cultural backgrounds.

  * •

Environmental Stewardship: Implementation of policies that prioritize
environmental sustainability, considering the impact on local ecosystems and
ensuring responsible resource management.

  * •

Social Justice and Equality: Development and implementation of policies that
combat social injustices, ensuring equal opportunities and fair representation
within societal institutions.

  * •

Healthcare Equity: Development of healthcare policies that prioritize equity,
ensuring equal access to quality healthcare services for all citizens.

  * •

Education Access: Implementation of inclusive educational policies, ensuring
equal access to quality education for individuals from different cultural
backgrounds.

  * •

Economic Inclusivity: Implementation of policies that promote economic
inclusivity, ensuring fair distribution of resources and opportunities within
the national economic framework.

  * •

Technological Ethics: Development of ethical guidelines for technology use,
fostering responsible innovation and addressing potential ethical challenges
in technological advancements.

  * •

Political Accountability: Development of transparent and accountable political
systems, ensuring representation and responsiveness to the needs of diverse
cultural and social groups.

  * •

Local, Inter-regional, and International Collaboration: Development of
policies that facilitate inter-regional and international collaboration,
ensuring equitable participation and mutual benefit.

####  Nation

  * •

Community Engagement and Communal Values: National policies promoting
community engagement, preserving cultural heritage, and recognizing the
importance of communal values in shaping the nation’s identity.

  * •

Cultural Sensitivity: National efforts to protect and promote cultural
diversity, recognizing the intrinsic value of each culture in contributing to
the nation’s identity.

  * •

Environmental Stewardship: National strategies for environmental protection,
addressing challenges like deforestation, wildlife conservation, and climate
change adaptation in the African context.

  * •

Social Justice and Equality: Policies should aim to address social injustices
and promote equality, ensuring that MI benefits are accessible to all segments
of society.

  * •

Healthcare Equity: National MI in healthcare should focus on equity, providing
accessible and affordable healthcare solutions for all citizens.

  * •

Education Access: Policies should promote equal access to education through
MI, bridging educational gaps and ensuring inclusivity.

  * •

Economic Inclusivity: National MI strategies should foster economic
inclusivity, preventing disparities and ensuring that the economic benefits of
MI are widespread.

  * •

Technological Ethics: National policies should address ethical considerations
related to technology, promoting responsible and ethical MI practices.

  * •

Political Accountability: Policies should incorporate mechanisms for political
accountability, ensuring that MI decisions align with democratic values and
are subject to scrutiny.

  * •

Local, Inter-regional and International Collaboration: Collaboration at
different levels is essential, involving local communities, inter-regional
partnerships, and international collaborations to address global challenges
and share best practices.

####  On and Off-Line Platforms

  * •

Community Engagement and Communal Values: Online platforms should engage
communities, respecting communal values, and ensuring that MIinteractions
align with local norms.

  * •

Cultural Sensitivity: Platforms should be culturally sensitive, catering to
diverse cultural backgrounds and ensuring that online MI experiences are
respectful.

  * •

Environmental Stewardship: Platforms should consider environmental impacts,
adopting eco-friendly practices in data centers and technology infrastructure.

  * •

Social Justice and Equality: Online platforms should promote social justice
and equality, preventing discrimination and ensuring fair representation.

  * •

Healthcare Equity: Online healthcare platforms should prioritize equity,
providing accessible healthcare information and services to all users.

  * •

Education Access: Online education platforms should ensure equal access to
educational resources, addressing digital divides and promoting inclusivity.

  * •

Economic Inclusivity: Platforms should promote economic inclusivity,
preventing digital exclusion and ensuring equal opportunities for online
participation.

  * •

Technological Ethics: Online platforms should adhere to ethical standards,
ensuring responsible data handling, privacy protection, and transparent
algorithms.

  * •

Political Accountability: Platforms should establish mechanisms for political
accountability, ensuring transparent governance and accountability in MI-
driven decisions.

  * •

Local, Inter-regional and International Collaboration: Collaboration on
platforms should extend beyond borders, involving local, inter-regional, and
international partnerships to address global challenges and ensure diverse
perspectives.

####  Globally

  * •

Community Engagement and Communal Values: Global MI initiatives should engage
communities worldwide, respecting diverse communal values and incorporating
them into decision-making processes.

  * •

Cultural Sensitivity: Global collaborations should be culturally sensitive,
considering and respecting diverse cultural values across different regions.

  * •

Environmental Stewardship: Global MI efforts should prioritize environmental
stewardship, promoting sustainable practices and minimizing the carbon
footprint of MI technologies.

  * •

Social Justice and Equality: Global MI collaborations should address global
social injustices and promote equality on a worldwide scale.

  * •

Healthcare Equity: Global efforts in MI healthcare should focus on equity,
ensuring that healthcare solutions are accessible and beneficial to
populations globally.

  * •

Education Access: Global initiatives should promote equal access to education
through MI, bridging educational gaps and ensuring global educational
inclusivity.

  * •

Economic Inclusivity: Global MI strategies should foster economic inclusivity,
preventing global disparities and ensuring that economic benefits are
distributed equitably.

  * •

Technological Ethics: Global collaborations should uphold technological
ethics, establishing common ethical standards and principles for MI
development and deployment globally.

  * •

Political Accountability: Global initiatives should incorporate mechanisms for
political accountability, ensuring that MI decisions align with democratic
values and are subject to international scrutiny.

  * •

Local, Inter-regional and International Collaboration: Collaboration at a
global level is essential, involving local, inter-regional, and international
partnerships to address global challenges and share best practices on a
broader scale.

####  Over Time

  * •

Community Engagement and Communal Values: Changes over time should involve
ongoing community engagement, ensuring that communal values are considered and
respected in evolving MI strategies.

  * •

Cultural Sensitivity: Evolving MI strategies should remain culturally
sensitive, adapting to changing cultural contexts over time.

  * •

Environmental Stewardship: MI developments should adapt over time to align
with evolving environmental standards and best practices.

  * •

Social Justice and Equality: Over time, MI policies should adapt to address
emerging social justice issues and promote ongoing equality.

  * •

Healthcare Equity: MI in healthcare should adapt over time to ensure ongoing
equity, addressing evolving healthcare challenges and disparities.

  * •

Education Access: MI in education should evolve over time to meet changing
educational needs and ensure continuous access to educational resources.

  * •

Economic Inclusivity: Over time, MI strategies should adapt to foster ongoing
economic inclusivity, preventing the emergence of new disparities.

  * •

Technological Ethics: Over time, technological ethics should evolve to address
emerging ethical challenges associated with advancing MI technologies.

  * •

Political Accountability: Over time, MI policies should adapt to maintain
political accountability, addressing new challenges and ensuring ongoing
transparency in political decisions influenced by MI.

  * •

Local, Inter-regional and International Collaboration: Collaboration should
continue over time, adapting to changing global dynamics and ensuring that MI
efforts remain collaborative, inclusive, and responsive to evolving
challenges.

###  8.4 Multi-scale ethics interactions

The strong interactions between the rows and columns of ethics in the
multiscale framework create a comprehensive and interconnected ethical
landscape. Let’s explore some of their relationships:

####  Community Engagement and Communal Values

  * •

Individual: Transparency and fairness at the individual level foster a sense
of responsibility and equity in engaging with communal values.

  * •

Different Cultures: Cultural sensitivity ensures that diverse cultural
perspectives are respected in communal discussions.

  * •

Institutions: Institutional responsibility shapes the transparency and
fairness of communal engagements.

  * •

Nation: Political accountability contributes to the responsible handling of
communal values on a national scale.

  * •

Globally: International collaboration promotes a shared understanding of
communal values globally.

  * •

Over Time: Historical perspectives guide the context-awareness and equitable
evolution of communal values.

####  Cultural Sensitivity

  * •

Individual: Personal awareness and responsibility enhance cultural sensitivity
in individual interactions.

  * •

Different Cultures: Collaborative efforts and fairness promote cultural
sensitivity among diverse cultural groups.

  * •

Institutions: Institutional responsibility ensures cultural sensitivity in
policies and practices.

  * •

Nation: Political accountability addresses cultural biases, fostering cultural
sensitivity on a national level.

  * •

Globally: Global collaboration shapes cultural sensitivity on a worldwide
scale.

  * •

Over Time: Historical perspectives contribute to the context-awareness and
equitable evolution of cultural sensitivity.

####  Environmental Stewardship

  * •

Individual: Responsible and transparent individual actions contribute to
environmental stewardship.

  * •

Different Cultures: Collaborative efforts and fairness address diverse
cultural perspectives in environmental practices.

  * •

Institutions: Institutional responsibility shapes transparent and fair
environmental stewardship policies.

  * •

Nation: Political accountability ensures equitable and responsible
environmental practices nationally.

  * •

Globally: Global collaboration fosters shared responsibility for environmental
stewardship worldwide.

  * •

Over Time: Historical perspectives guide context-aware and equitable
environmental stewardship evolution.

####  Social Justice and Equality

  * •

Individual: Fair and responsible individual actions contribute to social
justice and equality.

  * •

Different Cultures: Collaborative efforts and cultural sensitivity address
diverse cultural perspectives in promoting equality.

  * •

Institutions: Institutional responsibility shapes transparent and fair social
justice policies.

  * •

Nation: Political accountability ensures equitable and responsible social
justice on a national level.

  * •

Globally: Global collaboration fosters shared responsibility for social
justice and equality worldwide.

  * •

Over Time: Historical perspectives guide context-aware and equitable social
justice evolution.

####  Healthcare Equity

  * •

Individual: Responsible individual health practices contribute to equitable
healthcare.

Different Cultures: Collaborative efforts and cultural sensitivity address
diverse cultural health beliefs.

  * •

Institutions: Institutional responsibility shapes transparent and fair
healthcare policies.

  * •

Nation: Political accountability ensures equitable healthcare nationally.

  * •

Globally: Global collaboration fosters shared responsibility for healthcare
equity worldwide.

  * •

Over Time: Historical perspectives guide context-aware and equitable
healthcare evolution.

####  Education Access

  * •

Individual: Responsible individual learning practices contribute to equitable
education access.

  * •

Different Cultures: Collaborative efforts and fairness address diverse
cultural perspectives in education.

  * •

Institutions: Institutional responsibility shapes transparent and fair
education access policies.

  * •

Nation: Political accountability ensures equitable education nationally.

  * •

Globally: Global collaboration fosters shared responsibility for education
access worldwide.

  * •

Over Time: Historical perspectives guide context-aware and equitable education
access evolution.

####  Economic Inclusivity

  * •

Individual: Responsible economic practices contribute to economic inclusivity.
Different Cultures: Collaborative efforts and cultural sensitivity address
diverse cultural economic models.

  * •

Institutions: Institutional responsibility shapes transparent and fair
economic policies.

  * •

Nation: Political accountability ensures economic inclusivity on a national
level.

  * •

Globally: Global collaboration fosters shared responsibility for economic
inclusivity worldwide.

  * •

Over Time: Historical perspectives guide context-aware and equitable economic
inclusivity evolution.

####  Technological Ethics

  * •

Individual: Responsible individual technology use contributes to ethical
technology practices.

  * •

Different Cultures: Collaborative efforts and cultural sensitivity address
diverse cultural perspectives in technological ethics.

  * •

Institutions: Institutional responsibility shapes transparent and fair
technological policies.

  * •

Nation: Political accountability ensures ethical technology use on a national
level.

  * •

Globally: Global collaboration fosters shared responsibility for technological
ethics worldwide.

  * •

Over Time: Historical perspectives guide context-aware and equitable
technological ethics evolution.

####  Political Accountability

  * •

Individual: Responsible individual civic engagement contributes to political
accountability.

  * •

Different Cultures: Collaborative efforts and fairness address diverse
cultural political perspectives.

  * •

Institutions: Institutional responsibility shapes transparent and fair
political policies.

  * •

Nation: Political accountability ensures accountable political processes on a
national level.

  * •

Globally: Global collaboration fosters shared responsibility for political
accountability worldwide.

  * •

Over Time: Historical perspectives guide context-aware and equitable political
accountability evolution.

####  Local, Inter-Regional and International Collaboration

  * •

Individual: Responsible individual collaboration contributes to successful
global collaboration.

  * •

Different Cultures: Collaborative efforts and cultural sensitivity address
diverse cultural perspectives in collaborative initiatives.

  * •

Institutions: Institutional responsibility shapes transparent and fair
collaboration policies.

  * •

Nation: Political accountability ensures equitable collaboration nationally.

  * •

Globally: Global collaboration fosters shared responsibility for collaboration
worldwide.

  * •

Over Time: Historical perspectives guide context-aware and equitable
collaboration evolution.

###  Interactions Across Rows

Cultural sensitivity in communal values ensures that diverse cultural
perspectives are respected, creating an inclusive and fair community
engagement. Addressing social justice in environmental practices promotes
equitable and responsible environmental stewardship, considering the impact on
diverse communities. Promoting healthcare equity and education access ensures
that diverse communities have fair and transparent access to essential
services, contributing to overall well-being. Ethical technology practices
contribute to economic inclusivity, ensuring fair and responsible economic
policies that consider technological advancements. Political accountability
fosters fair collaboration, promoting transparent and responsible
collaboration in political processes.

###  Interactions Across Columns and Rows

Responsible individual actions contribute to positive outcomes across all
ethics areas, creating a foundation for transparency, fairness,
responsibility, equity, and context-awareness. Considering diverse cultural
perspectives in individual actions, collaborative efforts, and institutional
responsibilities ensures inclusivity, fairness, and cultural sensitivity.
Institutional responsibility influences national policies, shaping the ethical
landscape within a country and contributing to responsible governance and fair
practices. Global collaboration and historical perspectives guide the
evolution of ethical practices over time, fostering a globally inclusive,
transparent, fair, responsible, and context-aware approach.

### Multi-interactions of ethics

The interactions between multiple columns in the multiscale ethics framework
are dynamic and interwoven, creating a cohesive ethical environment.
Transparency and fairness at the individual level contribute to fair
institutional policies, while acknowledging diverse cultural perspectives
promotes responsible governance on a national level. Global responsibility
guides the equitable evolution of ethical norms over time, and context-
awareness influences fair collaboration across local, inter-regional, and
international scales. The connections between equity and context-awareness
extend to various columns, such as healthcare equity influencing fair and
context-aware education access. Overall, the principles of transparency,
fairness, responsibility, equity, and context-awareness intersect, shaping
ethical behavior across different scales and fostering a holistic and
inclusive ethical framework over time.

Table 61: Multi-interactions of ethics Ethics Area |  Individual |  Different Cultures |  Institutions |  Nation |  Platforms |  Globally |  Over Time
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---
Community Engagement and Communal Values |  Personal commitment |  Respect for diverse values |  Establishment of guidelines |  Integration into policies |  Engagement in online and offline communities |  Recognition and appreciation of diverse values |  Preservation and adaptation over generations
Cultural Sensitivity |  Cultural awareness |  Mutual respect |  Implementation of policies |  Promotion as a national asset |  Cultural inclusivity in digital spaces |  Collaboration with diverse international cultures |  Preservation and evolution of cultural identities
Environmental Stewardship |  Personal responsibility |  Integration of eco-friendly practices |  Implementation of environmental policies |  National commitment to sustainability |  Online platforms promoting eco-conscious actions |  Global cooperation on sustainable development |  Sustainable practices for future generations
Social Justice and Equality |  Advocacy for equality |  Recognition of diverse perspectives |  Implementation of policies |  Legal frameworks for social justice |  Online platforms for advocacy and awareness |  Global collaboration on human rights |  Progression toward increased social justice
Healthcare Equity |  Personal health responsibility |  Culturally sensitive healthcare practices |  Equal access healthcare systems |  National health policies for equity |  Digital platforms for health information |  Global collaborations for health equity |  Sustainable healthcare for future generations
Education Access |  Personal commitment to learning |  Inclusion of diverse educational perspectives |  Equal access educational systems |  National commitment to accessible education |  Online platforms for e-learning |  Global partnerships for education opportunities |  Evolving education systems over generations
Economic Inclusivity |  Ethical economic practices |  Integration of diverse economic models |  Economic policies for inclusivity |  National commitment to inclusive growth |  Online platforms promoting fair economic practices |  Collaborative efforts for global economic inclusivity |  Sustainable economic practices for future generations
Technological Ethics |  Responsible technology use |  Consideration of diverse cultural perspectives |  Ethical guidelines and regulations |  National policies for responsible technology |  Digital platforms for ethical tech discussions |  International agreements on ethical tech use |  Ethical considerations in technological advancements
Political Accountability |  Active civic engagement |  Recognition of diverse political perspectives |  Transparent political systems |  National commitment to accountability |  Digital platforms for political discourse |  International collaboration for transparent governance |  Evolution of political accountability
Local, Inter-regional and International Collaboration |  Appreciation for global perspectives |  Integration of diverse international viewpoints |  Global collaboration frameworks |  National commitment to international cooperation |  Online platforms for cross-cultural collaboration |  Collaborative efforts on global challenges |  Building and sustaining international collaborations

###  8.5  Ethics at the individual level: users, developers, designers,
individual investors

####  Community Engagement and Communal Values

Individual: Transparency involves openly communicating personal values and
commitments to the community. Fairness ensures equal participation,
responsibility in upholding communal values, and equity in benefit-sharing.
Responsibility requires individuals to contribute positively to the community.
Context-awareness considers the cultural context and its impact on communal
values.

####  Cultural Sensitivity

Individual: Transparent appreciation of diverse cultures, ensuring fairness in
personal interactions. Responsibility involves learning and adapting to
cultural nuances. Equity includes respecting cultural differences. Context-
awareness requires understanding the cultural context of one’s actions.

####  Environmental Stewardship

Individual: Transparent eco-friendly practices, fair resource consumption,
responsible waste management, and equitable access to a clean environment.
Responsibility involves personal actions for environmental sustainability.
Context-awareness considers local ecosystems.

####  Social Justice and Equality

Individual: Transparent advocacy for social justice, fair treatment of diverse
perspectives, and responsible behavior. Equity requires acknowledging and
addressing social disparities. Context-awareness involves understanding the
unique challenges faced by different groups.

####  Healthcare Equity

Individual: Transparency in personal health choices, fair access to healthcare
information, responsible health practices, and equitable support for
healthcare access. Context-awareness considers cultural health beliefs and
practices.

####  Education Access

Individual: Transparent commitment to learning, fairness in educational
opportunities, responsible study habits, and equity in access to education.
Context-awareness involves understanding diverse learning needs.

####  Economic Inclusivity:

Individual: Transparent economic practices, fair business dealings,
responsible financial decisions, and equitable opportunities. Context-
awareness considers local economic contexts.

####  Technological Ethics

Individual: Transparent use of technology, fair consideration of diverse
perspectives, responsible digital behavior, and equitable access to
technological benefits. Context-awareness involves understanding the societal
impact of technology.

####  Political Accountability:

Individual: Transparent civic engagement, fair consideration of political
perspectives, responsible voting, and equity in political representation.
Context-awareness involves understanding the political context of one’s
actions.

####  Local, Inter-regional and International Collaboration

Individual: Transparent appreciation for global perspectives, fair
collaboration, responsible global citizenship, and equity in international
interactions. Context-awareness involves understanding the cultural and
political contexts of collaborating regions.

###  8.6  Different Cultures, Different groups, Culture-Aware Ethics

####  Community Engagement and Communal Values

Different Cultures:

  * •

Transparency: Transparent appreciation for diverse cultural values and
practices, openly sharing and learning about different cultural perspectives
within the community.

  * •

Fairness: Fair treatment of all cultures within the community, ensuring that
cultural diversity is recognized and respected in communal engagements.

  * •

Responsibility: Responsible engagement with different cultures, taking
initiative to understand and promote cultural awareness within the community.

  * •

Equity: Equitable representation of diverse cultural voices, ensuring that all
cultures have an equal opportunity to contribute to communal values.

  * •

Context-Awareness: Being context-aware of the cultural nuances and
sensitivities, adapting community engagements to respect the diversity of
cultures involved.

####  Cultural Sensitivity

Different Cultures:

  * •

Transparency: Transparent communication of cultural awareness, acknowledging
the richness of various cultures, and expressing openness to cultural
learning.

  * •

Fairness: Fair treatment of all cultures, avoiding biases or preferences, and
appreciating the unique aspects of each cultural identity.

  * •

Responsibility: Taking responsibility for cultural education, actively
challenging stereotypes, and contributing positively to cultural
understanding.

  * •

Equity: Equitable consideration of all cultures, valuing diversity, and
ensuring that no culture is marginalized or unfairly treated.

  * •

Context-Awareness: Being context-aware of cultural contexts, understanding
historical and social factors shaping cultures, and adapting behavior to show
respect within specific cultural settings.

####  Environmental Stewardship

Different Cultures:

  * •

Transparency: Transparent communication about the environmental impact of
diverse cultural practices, fostering awareness and open dialogue.

  * •

Fairness: Fair consideration of how different cultures interact with the
environment, ensuring that environmental practices are just and inclusive.

  * •

Responsibility: Shared responsibility for environmental sustainability,
acknowledging the role of diverse cultures in preserving ecosystems.

  * •

Equity: Equitable distribution of environmental responsibilities, recognizing
that all cultures should contribute to sustainable practices.

  * •

Context-Awareness: Being context-aware of local ecosystems, adapting
environmental stewardship to respect the unique environmental contexts shaped
by different cultures.

####  Social Justice and Equality

Different Cultures:

  * •

Transparency: Transparent advocacy for social justice, openly addressing
cultural disparities, and promoting fairness in social issues.

  * •

Fairness: Fair consideration of cultural perspectives in social justice
matters, ensuring that diverse voices are heard and valued.

  * •

Responsibility: Shared responsibility for addressing cultural inequalities,
actively working towards equitable social outcomes.

  * •

Equity: Equitable treatment of different cultural groups, acknowledging and
rectifying social injustices across cultures.

  * •

Context-Awareness: Being context-aware of unique challenges faced by different
cultural groups, adapting social justice efforts to address specific cultural
contexts.

####  Healthcare Equity

Different Cultures:

  * •

Transparency: Transparent communication about healthcare practices, openly
discussing cultural factors that influence health decisions.

  * •

Fairness: Fair consideration of cultural beliefs in healthcare, ensuring that
healthcare practices are culturally sensitive and inclusive.

  * •

Responsibility: Taking responsibility for understanding and respecting diverse
healthcare needs, contributing to culturally competent healthcare.

  * •

Equity: Equitable access to healthcare for all cultural groups, addressing
healthcare disparities and promoting inclusive health policies.

  * •

Context-Awareness: Being context-aware of cultural health beliefs, adapting
healthcare approaches to respect and integrate diverse cultural perspectives.

####  Education Access

Different Cultures:

  * •

Transparency: Transparent communication about educational opportunities,
fostering open dialogue about the importance of education across diverse
cultures.

  * •

Fairness: Fair consideration of diverse cultural perspectives in education,
ensuring that educational resources are accessible to all cultural groups.

  * •

Responsibility: Taking responsibility for promoting education across cultures,
actively contributing to inclusive educational environments.

  * •

Equity: Equitable access to educational opportunities for all cultural groups,
addressing educational disparities and promoting inclusive educational
policies.

  * •

Context-Awareness: Being context-aware of diverse learning needs shaped by
cultural backgrounds, adapting educational approaches to respect and
accommodate cultural diversity.

####  Economic Inclusivity

Different Cultures:

  * •

Transparency: Transparent communication about economic opportunities,
fostering an open discussion about economic practices that respect diverse
cultures.

  * •

Fairness: Fair consideration of diverse cultural economic models, ensuring
that economic opportunities are distributed without bias.

  * •

Responsibility: Taking responsibility for ethical economic practices across
cultures, actively contributing to fair economic behavior.

  * •

Equity: Equitable economic opportunities for all cultural groups, addressing
economic disparities and promoting inclusive economic policies.

  * •

Context-Awareness: Being context-aware of local economic contexts, adapting
economic practices to respect and integrate diverse cultural perspectives.

####  Technological Ethics

Different Cultures:

  * •

Transparency: Transparent communication about technological advancements,
fostering open discussions about how technology impacts diverse cultures.

  * •

Fairness: Fair consideration of diverse cultural perspectives in technological
development, ensuring that technology is designed without bias.

  * •

Responsibility: Taking responsibility for ethical technology use across
cultures, actively contributing to the responsible development and use of
technology.

  * •

Equity: Equitable access to technological benefits for all cultural groups,
addressing digital disparities and promoting inclusive technology policies.

  * •

Context-Awareness: Being context-aware of the societal impact of technology on
different cultures, adapting technological approaches to respect and
accommodate diverse cultural perspectives.

####  Political Accountability

Different Cultures:

  * •

Transparency: Transparent communication about political processes, fostering
open dialogue about the impact of politics on diverse cultures.

  * •

Fairness: Fair consideration of diverse political perspectives, ensuring that
political systems are just and inclusive.

  * •

Responsibility: Taking responsibility for political engagement across
cultures, actively contributing to transparent and accountable political
processes.

  * •

Equity: Equitable political representation for all cultural groups, addressing
political disparities and promoting inclusive political policies.

  * •

Context-Awareness: Being context-aware of the political contexts of different
cultures, adapting political engagement to respect and integrate diverse
cultural perspectives.

#### International Collaboration on MI Ethics in Africa

Different Cultures:

  * •

Transparency: Transparent communication about collaborative efforts on MI
ethics, fostering open dialogue about the impact of MI policies on diverse
cultures within Africa.

  * •

Fairness: Fair consideration of diverse cultural perspectives in international
collaborations, ensuring that MI ethics frameworks are just and inclusive
across the continent.

  * •

Responsibility: Taking responsibility for collaborative MI ethics initiatives
across cultures, actively contributing to transparent and accountable ethical
frameworks for MI deployment.

  * •

Equity: Equitable representation in international collaborations for all
cultural groups within Africa, addressing disparities and promoting inclusive
MI ethics policies.

  * •

Context-Awareness: Being context-aware of the cultural diversity within Africa
in MI ethics, adapting collaborative efforts to respect and integrate diverse
cultural perspectives in shaping ethical guidelines for MI.

###  8.7 Institutions

####  Community Engagement and Communal Values

Institutions:

  * •

Transparency: Transparent establishment of guidelines for environmental
stewardship initiatives, openly communicating institutional strategies for
sustainability within the community.

  * •

Fairness: Fair implementation of environmental policies, ensuring that all
community members have equal access to information and opportunities for
involvement.

  * •

Responsibility: Institutional responsibility for fostering positive
environmental practices within the community, actively engaging in initiatives
for sustainable development.

  * •

Equity: Equitable distribution of environmental benefits and responsibilities
among community members, addressing environmental disparities.

  * •

Context-Awareness: Instituting context-aware environmental programs that
consider local ecosystems, adapting initiatives to respect the unique
environmental context.

####  Cultural Sensitivity

Institutions:

  * •

Transparency: Transparent communication about how institutional practices
consider and respect diverse cultural environmental perspectives.

  * •

Fairness: Fair integration of cultural values into institutional environmental
policies, ensuring that no culture is disproportionately affected.

  * •

Responsibility: Institutional responsibility for fostering cultural
sensitivity in environmental initiatives, actively addressing cultural
implications of environmental decisions.

  * •

Equity: Equitable distribution of environmental benefits and burdens,
recognizing and rectifying any cultural biases in institutional practices.

  * •

Context-Awareness: Developing institution-wide environmental strategies that
respect and integrate the diverse cultural contexts shaping environmental
perspectives.

####  Environmental Stewardship

Institutions:

  * •

Transparency: Transparent communication of institutional efforts for
environmental stewardship, openly sharing goals, progress, and outcomes with
stakeholders.

  * •

Fairness: Fair allocation of resources and opportunities for environmental
initiatives, ensuring that all stakeholders have a fair chance to participate.

  * •

Responsibility: Institutional responsibility for implementing effective
environmental stewardship practices, actively contributing to global
sustainability goals.

  * •

Equity: Equitable distribution of environmental benefits, addressing any
disparities in the impact of institutional environmental practices.

  * •

Context-Awareness: Developing institution-wide environmental strategies that
consider the unique contexts of local ecosystems and global environmental
challenges.

####  Social Justice and Equality

Institutions:

  * •

Transparency: Transparent communication of institutional efforts for social
justice in the context of environmental initiatives, fostering open dialogue
about the social implications.

  * •

Fairness: Fair consideration of diverse social perspectives in institutional
environmental policies, ensuring that social justice is central to
sustainability practices.

  * •

Responsibility: Institutional responsibility for addressing social
inequalities exacerbated by environmental issues, actively working toward
equitable outcomes.

  * •

Equity: Equitable distribution of social and environmental benefits,
recognizing and rectifying any social disparities resulting from institutional
practices.

  * •

Context-Awareness: Developing institution-wide environmental strategies that
are context-aware of unique social challenges, adapting initiatives to promote
social justice.

####  Healthcare Equity

Institutions:

  * •

Transparency: Transparent communication about how institutional healthcare
practices consider and respect diverse cultural health beliefs.

  * •

Fairness: Fair integration of cultural values into institutional healthcare
policies, ensuring that healthcare services are culturally sensitive and
inclusive.

  * •

Responsibility: Institutional responsibility for fostering healthcare equity,
actively addressing cultural implications of healthcare decisions and
practices.

  * •

Equity: Equitable distribution of healthcare benefits, recognizing and
rectifying any cultural biases in institutional healthcare services.

  * •

Context-Awareness: Developing institution-wide healthcare strategies that
consider the unique cultural contexts shaping health beliefs and practices.

####  Education Access

Institutions:

  * •

Transparency: Transparent communication of institutional efforts for promoting
education access, openly sharing strategies and progress with stakeholders.

  * •

Fairness: Fair allocation of resources and opportunities for education access
initiatives, ensuring that all stakeholders have a fair chance to participate.

  * •

Responsibility: Institutional responsibility for implementing effective
education access practices, actively contributing to inclusive educational
environments.

  * •

Equity: Equitable distribution of educational benefits, addressing any
disparities in the impact of institutional education access practices.

  * •

Context-Awareness: Developing institution-wide education access strategies
that are context-aware of diverse learning needs and cultural backgrounds.

####  Economic Inclusivity

Institutions:

  * •

Transparency: Transparent communication about how institutional economic
practices consider and respect diverse cultural economic models.

  * •

Fairness: Fair integration of diverse economic models into institutional
economic policies, ensuring that economic opportunities are distributed
without bias.

  * •

Responsibility: Institutional responsibility for fostering economic
inclusivity, actively addressing cultural implications of economic decisions
and practices.

  * •

Equity: Equitable distribution of economic benefits, recognizing and
rectifying any cultural biases in institutional economic practices.

  * •

Context-Awareness: Developing institution-wide economic inclusivity strategies
that are context-aware of local economic contexts and diverse cultural
perspectives.

####  Technological Ethics

Institutions:

  * •

Transparency: Transparent communication about institutional technological
advancements, fostering open dialogue about how technology impacts diverse
cultures.

  * •

Fairness: Fair consideration of diverse cultural perspectives in institutional
technological development, ensuring that technology is designed without bias
and aligns with ethical standards.

  * •

Responsibility: Institutional responsibility for ethical technology use,
actively contributing to responsible development and deployment of technology
within diverse cultural contexts.

  * •

Equity: Equitable access to technological benefits for all cultural groups,
addressing digital disparities and promoting inclusive technology policies.

  * •

Context-Awareness: Developing institution-wide technological strategies that
are context-aware of the societal impact on different cultures, adapting
technological approaches to respect and accommodate diverse cultural
perspectives.

####  Political Accountability

Institutions:

  * •

Transparency: Transparent communication about institutional political
processes, fostering open dialogue about the impact of politics on diverse
cultures.

  * •

Fairness: Fair consideration of diverse political perspectives in
institutional policies, ensuring that political systems are just and
inclusive.

  * •

Responsibility: Institutional responsibility for political accountability,
actively contributing to transparent and accountable political processes
within diverse cultural contexts.

  * •

Equity: Equitable political representation for all cultural groups, addressing
political disparities and promoting inclusive political policies.

  * •

Context-Awareness: Developing institution-wide political accountability
strategies that are context-aware of the political contexts of different
cultures, adapting political engagement to respect and integrate diverse
cultural perspectives.

####  Local, Inter-regional and International Collaboration

Institutions:

  * •

Transparency: Transparent communication in collaborative efforts, fostering
open dialogue about the goals, strategies, and outcomes of institutional
collaborations across cultures.

  * •

Fairness: Fair consideration of diverse cultural perspectives in collaborative
initiatives, ensuring that all collaborators have an equal voice and role.

  * •

Responsibility: Institutional responsibility for promoting collaborative
efforts that respect cultural diversity, actively contributing to positive
global collaborations.

  * •

Equity: Equitable distribution of benefits and responsibilities in
collaborative initiatives, recognizing and rectifying any cultural biases in
institutional collaborations.

  * •

Context-Awareness: Developing institution-wide collaboration strategies that
are context-aware of the cultural nuances and challenges in local, inter-
regional, and international contexts.

###  8.8  Ethics at a Nation Level

####  Community Engagement and Communal Values

Nation:

  * •

Transparency: The nation promotes transparent communication about communal
values and engagement strategies, ensuring that citizens are informed about
the goals and outcomes of community initiatives.

  * •

Fairness: The nation works towards fair distribution of resources and
opportunities within communities, striving to eliminate disparities and
promote inclusivity in communal values.

  * •

Responsibility: The nation holds a responsibility to support and facilitate
positive communal values, actively engaging in initiatives that contribute to
the well-being of communities.

  * •

Equity: The nation aims for equitable development across communities,
addressing regional disparities and promoting equal access to communal
benefits.

  * •

Context-Awareness: The nation considers the unique cultural and geographical
contexts of different communities, adapting national strategies to respect and
accommodate diversity.

####  Cultural Sensitivity

Nation:

  * •

Transparency: The nation transparently communicates its commitment to cultural
sensitivity, ensuring that policies and initiatives consider and respect
diverse cultural perspectives.

  * •

Fairness: The nation strives for fair treatment of all cultures, fostering an
environment where cultural diversity is celebrated and valued.

  * •

Responsibility: The nation takes responsibility for fostering a culturally
sensitive environment, actively working to eliminate cultural biases in
national policies.

  * •

Equity: The nation aims for equitable representation of cultural voices in
national decision-making, recognizing and addressing any cultural disparities.

  * •

Context-Awareness: The nation develops cultural policies that are context-
aware, considering the historical and social context of different cultural
groups within the nation.

####  Environmental Stewardship

Nation:

  * •

Transparency: The nation communicates transparently about its environmental
stewardship efforts, sharing information about national strategies for
sustainability.

  * •

Fairness: The nation ensures fair distribution of environmental benefits and
responsibilities, working to eliminate environmental injustices across
regions.

  * •

Responsibility: The nation takes responsibility for implementing effective
national environmental stewardship practices, contributing to global
sustainability goals.

  * •

Equity: The nation aims for equitable environmental policies, addressing any
disparities in the impact of national environmental practices.

  * •

Context-Awareness: The nation develops national environmental strategies that
consider the unique contexts of local ecosystems and diverse geographical
regions.

####  Social Justice and Equality

Nation:

  * •

Transparency: The nation communicates transparently about its efforts for
social justice, fostering open dialogue about the social implications of
national policies.

  * •

Fairness: The nation ensures fair consideration of diverse social perspectives
in national policies, striving for just and inclusive outcomes.

  * •

Responsibility: The nation takes responsibility for addressing social
inequalities exacerbated by national issues, actively working toward equitable
social outcomes.

  * •

Equity: The nation aims for equitable distribution of social benefits,
recognizing and rectifying any social disparities resulting from national
practices.

  * •

Context-Awareness: The nation develops national strategies that are context-
aware of unique social challenges, adapting policies to promote social
justice.

####  Healthcare Equity

Nation:

  * •

Transparency: The nation communicates transparently about how national
healthcare practices consider and respect diverse cultural health beliefs.

  * •

Fairness: The nation ensures fair integration of cultural values into national
healthcare policies, promoting healthcare services that are culturally
sensitive and inclusive.

  * •

Responsibility: The nation takes responsibility for fostering healthcare
equity, actively addressing cultural implications of national healthcare
decisions and practices.

  * •

Equity: The nation aims for equitable distribution of healthcare benefits,
recognizing and rectifying any cultural biases in national healthcare
services.

  * •

Context-Awareness: The nation develops national healthcare strategies that are
context-aware, considering the unique cultural contexts shaping health beliefs
and practices.

####  Education Access

Nation:

  * •

Transparency: The nation transparently communicates its efforts to promote
education access, ensuring that citizens are informed about national
strategies and progress.

  * •

Fairness: The nation ensures fair allocation of resources and opportunities
for education access initiatives, striving to eliminate disparities and
promote inclusivity in education.

  * •

Responsibility: The nation takes responsibility for implementing effective
national education access practices, actively contributing to inclusive
educational environments.

  * •

Equity: The nation aims for equitable distribution of educational benefits,
addressing any disparities in the impact of national education access
practices.

  * •

Context-Awareness: The nation develops national education access strategies
that are context-aware, considering diverse learning needs shaped by cultural
backgrounds.

####  Economic Inclusivity

Nation:

  * •

Transparency: The nation transparently communicates about how national
economic practices consider and respect diverse cultural economic models.

  * •

Fairness: The nation ensures fair integration of diverse economic models into
national economic policies, promoting economic opportunities that are
distributed without bias.

  * •

Responsibility: The nation takes responsibility for fostering economic
inclusivity, actively addressing cultural implications of national economic
decisions and practices.

  * •

Equity: The nation aims for equitable distribution of economic benefits,
recognizing and rectifying any cultural biases in national economic practices.

  * •

Context-Awareness: The nation develops national economic inclusivity
strategies that are context-aware, considering local economic contexts and
diverse cultural perspectives.

####  Technological Ethics

Nation:

  * •

Transparency: The nation transparently communicates about national
technological advancements, fostering open dialogue about how technology
impacts diverse cultures.

  * •

Fairness: The nation ensures fair consideration of diverse cultural
perspectives in national technological development, striving for technology
that is designed without bias.

  * •

Responsibility: The nation takes responsibility for ethical technology use,
actively contributing to the responsible development and deployment of
technology within diverse cultural contexts.

  * •

Equity: The nation aims for equitable access to technological benefits for all
cultural groups, addressing digital disparities and promoting inclusive
technology policies.

  * •

Context-Awareness: The nation develops national technological strategies that
are context-aware, considering the societal impact of technology on different
cultures and adapting technological approaches to respect and accommodate
diverse cultural perspectives.

####  Political Accountability

Nation:

  * •

Transparency: The nation communicates transparently about national political
processes, fostering open dialogue about the impact of politics on diverse
cultures.

  * •

Fairness: The nation ensures fair consideration of diverse political
perspectives in national policies, striving for political systems that are
just and inclusive.

  * •

Responsibility: The nation takes responsibility for political accountability,
actively contributing to transparent and accountable political processes
within diverse cultural contexts.

  * •

Equity: The nation aims for equitable political representation for all
cultural groups, addressing political disparities and promoting inclusive
political policies.

  * •

Context-Awareness: The nation develops national political accountability
strategies that are context-aware, considering the political contexts of
different cultures and adapting political engagement to respect and integrate
diverse cultural perspectives.

####  Local, Inter-regional and International Collaboration

Nation:

  * •

Transparency: The nation transparently communicates in collaborative efforts,
fostering open dialogue about the goals, strategies, and outcomes of national
collaborations across cultures.

  * •

Fairness: The nation ensures fair consideration of diverse cultural
perspectives in national collaborative initiatives, striving for equal
representation and contributions.

  * •

Responsibility: The nation takes responsibility for promoting collaborative
efforts that respect cultural diversity, actively contributing to positive
global collaborations.

  * •

Equity: The nation aims for equitable distribution of benefits and
responsibilities in national collaborative initiatives, recognizing and
rectifying any cultural biases.

  * •

Context-Awareness: The nation develops national collaboration strategies that
are context-aware, considering the cultural nuances and challenges in local,
inter-regional, and international contexts.

###  8.9  Ethics at the Platforms level

####  Community Engagement and Communal Values

On and off-line platforms:

  * •

Transparency: On and off-line platforms facilitate transparent communication
about community engagement, ensuring that information about communal values is
accessible and openly discussed.

  * •

Fairness: Platforms strive to provide fair representation of diverse voices,
fostering an inclusive space where different perspectives on communal values
are acknowledged and respected.

  * •

Responsibility: Platforms take responsibility for maintaining a positive
community engagement environment, actively moderating discussions and
addressing any issues that may arise.

  * •

Equity: Platforms work towards equitable participation, ensuring that
individuals from all backgrounds have equal opportunities to engage and
contribute to communal values discussions.

  * •

Context-Awareness: Platforms are context-aware, adapting to the cultural
nuances and diversity of perspectives within community engagement discussions
both online and offline.

####  Cultural Sensitivity

On and off-line platforms:

  * •

Transparency: Platforms transparently communicate their commitment to cultural
sensitivity, providing clear guidelines on respectful interactions and content
sharing that considers diverse cultural perspectives.

  * •

Fairness: Platforms aim for fair representation and treatment of diverse
cultural content, fostering an environment where cultural sensitivity is a
central aspect of online and offline discussions.

  * •

Responsibility: Platforms take responsibility for promoting cultural
sensitivity, actively moderating content to eliminate cultural biases and
ensuring respectful interactions among users.

  * •

Equity: Platforms work towards equitable access to cultural content,
addressing any disparities and promoting the inclusion of various cultural
perspectives in online and offline spaces.

  * •

Context-Awareness: Platforms are context-aware, adapting their guidelines and
content moderation practices to respect the unique cultural contexts shaping
online and offline discussions.

####  Environmental Stewardship

On and off-line platforms:

  * •

Transparency: Platforms transparently share information about environmental
stewardship efforts, utilizing online spaces to disseminate knowledge and
updates on national and global sustainability initiatives.

  * •

Fairness: Platforms promote fair and unbiased coverage of environmental
issues, ensuring that discussions on environmental stewardship represent
diverse perspectives and solutions.

  * •

Responsibility: Platforms take responsibility for encouraging positive
environmental practices, actively engaging users in discussions and
initiatives that contribute to environmental sustainability.

  * •

Equity: Platforms aim for equitable distribution of environmental information,
addressing any disparities in access to discussions and resources related to
environmental stewardship.

  * •

Context-Awareness: Platforms are context-aware, adapting their approach to
environmental discussions to consider the global and local contexts shaping
sustainability efforts.

####  Social Justice and Equality

On and off-line platforms:

  * •

Transparency: Platforms transparently communicate efforts for social justice,
utilizing online spaces to share information about initiatives and advocate
for equality.

  * •

Fairness: Platforms work towards fair representation of diverse social
perspectives, fostering an inclusive environment where discussions on social
justice are free from biases.

  * •

Responsibility: Platforms take responsibility for addressing social
inequalities, actively moderating content and discussions to promote a just
and equal online and offline space.

  * •

Equity: Platforms aim for equitable access to social justice discussions,
recognizing and rectifying any disparities in the impact of online and offline
practices.

  * •

Context-Awareness: Platforms are context-aware, adapting their approach to
social justice discussions to consider the unique social challenges and
contexts influencing equality.

####  Healthcare Equity

On and off-line platforms:

  * •

Transparency: Platforms transparently communicate about how healthcare
practices consider and respect diverse cultural health beliefs, disseminating
information about inclusive healthcare initiatives.

  * •

Fairness: Platforms ensure fair integration of cultural values into healthcare
discussions, fostering an online environment where healthcare services are
culturally sensitive and inclusive.

  * •

Responsibility: Platforms take responsibility for promoting healthcare equity,
actively engaging users in discussions and initiatives that address cultural
implications of healthcare decisions and practices.

  * •

Equity: Platforms aim for equitable access to healthcare discussions and
information, recognizing and rectifying any cultural biases in online and
offline healthcare spaces.

  * •

Context-Awareness: Platforms are context-aware, adapting their healthcare
discussions to consider the unique cultural contexts shaping health beliefs
and practices in online and offline settings.

####  Education Access

On and off-line platforms:

  * •

Transparency: Platforms transparently communicate efforts to promote education
access, utilizing online spaces to share information about initiatives and
progress in making education accessible.

  * •

Fairness: Platforms ensure fair allocation of resources and opportunities for
education access initiatives, fostering an online environment where all users
have equal chances to participate in educational discussions.

  * •

Responsibility: Platforms take responsibility for implementing effective
education access practices, actively contributing to inclusive educational
environments both online and offline.

  * •

Equity: Platforms aim for equitable distribution of educational benefits,
addressing any disparities in the impact of online and offline education
access practices.

  * •

Context-Awareness: Platforms are context-aware, adapting their approach to
education access discussions to consider diverse learning needs and cultural
backgrounds in online and offline spaces.

####  Economic Inclusivity

On and off-line platforms:

  * •

Transparency: Platforms transparently communicate about how economic practices
consider and respect diverse cultural economic models, disseminating
information about inclusive economic initiatives.

  * •

Fairness: Platforms ensure fair integration of diverse economic models into
economic discussions, fostering an online environment where economic
opportunities are distributed without bias.

  * •

Responsibility: Platforms take responsibility for promoting economic
inclusivity, actively engaging users in discussions and initiatives that
address cultural implications of economic decisions and practices.

  * •

Equity: Platforms aim for equitable access to economic discussions and
benefits, recognizing and rectifying any cultural biases in online and offline
economic spaces. Context-Awareness: Platforms are context-aware, adapting
their economic discussions to consider local economic contexts and diverse
cultural perspectives in online and offline settings.

####  Technological Ethics

On and off-line platforms:

  * •

Transparency: Platforms transparently communicate about national technological
advancements, fostering open dialogue about how technology impacts diverse
cultures in online and offline spaces.

  * •

Fairness: Platforms ensure fair consideration of diverse cultural perspectives
in technological discussions, striving for technology that is designed without
bias in both online and offline environments.

  * •

Responsibility: Platforms take responsibility for ethical technology use,
actively contributing to the responsible development and deployment of
technology within diverse cultural contexts online and offline.

  * •

Equity: Platforms aim for equitable access to technological benefits for all
cultural groups, addressing digital disparities and promoting inclusive
technology policies in both online and offline spaces.

  * •

Context-Awareness: Platforms are context-aware, adapting their technological
discussions to consider the societal impact of technology on different
cultures in both online and offline settings.

####  Political Accountability

On and off-line platforms:

  * •

Transparency: Platforms transparently communicate about national political
processes, fostering open dialogue about the impact of politics on diverse
cultures in online and offline spaces.

  * •

Fairness: Platforms ensure fair consideration of diverse political
perspectives in political discussions, striving for just and inclusive
political systems both online and offline.

  * •

Responsibility: Platforms take responsibility for political accountability,
actively contributing to transparent and accountable political processes
within diverse cultural contexts online and offline.

  * •

Equity: Platforms aim for equitable political representation for all cultural
groups in political discussions, addressing political disparities and
promoting inclusive political policies both online and offline.

  * •

Context-Awareness: Platforms are context-aware, adapting their political
discussions to consider the political contexts of different cultures and
adapting political engagement to respect and integrate diverse cultural
perspectives in both online and offline spaces.

####  Local, Inter-regional and International Collaboration

On and off-line platforms:

  * •

Transparency: Platforms transparently communicate in collaborative efforts,
fostering open dialogue about the goals, strategies, and outcomes of
collaborative initiatives across cultures in both online and offline spaces.

  * •

Fairness: Platforms ensure fair consideration of diverse cultural perspectives
in collaborative initiatives, striving for equal representation and
contributions both online and offline.

  * •

Responsibility: Platforms take responsibility for promoting collaborative
efforts that respect cultural diversity, actively contributing to positive
global collaborations in both online and offline spaces.

  * •

Equity: Platforms aim for equitable distribution of benefits and
responsibilities in collaborative initiatives, recognizing and rectifying any
cultural biases both online and offline.

  * •

Context-Awareness: Platforms are context-aware, adapting their collaboration
strategies to consider the cultural nuances and challenges in local, inter-
regional, and international contexts both online and offline.

###  8.10  What ethics at the globe level?

Think global strategies, Act locally ?

####  Community Engagement and Communal Values

Globally:

  * •

Transparency: Global engagement platforms ensure transparency by facilitating
open communication about communal values on a global scale, fostering a cross-
cultural exchange of ideas and perspectives.

  * •

Fairness: Platforms strive for fairness by promoting equal representation of
diverse global voices, creating an inclusive space where different cultures
contribute to the discussion on communal values.

  * •

Responsibility: Global platforms take responsibility for fostering positive
global communal values, actively moderating discussions to ensure respectful
cross-cultural interactions and addressing any global issues that may arise.

  * •

Equity: Platforms work towards equitable global participation, ensuring that
individuals from all corners of the world have equal opportunities to engage
and contribute to discussions on communal values.

  * •

Context-Awareness: Global platforms are context-aware, adapting to the
cultural nuances and diversity of perspectives within global community
engagement discussions.

####  Cultural Sensitivity

Globally:

  * •

Transparency: Global platforms transparently communicate their commitment to
cultural sensitivity, providing guidelines on respectful global interactions
and content sharing that considers diverse cultural perspectives.

  * •

Fairness: Platforms aim for fair representation and treatment of diverse
global cultural content, fostering a worldwide environment where cultural
sensitivity is a central aspect of online discussions.

  * •

Responsibility: Global platforms take responsibility for promoting cultural
sensitivity globally, actively moderating content to eliminate cultural biases
and ensuring respectful interactions among users from different cultures.

  * •

Equity: Platforms work towards equitable access to global cultural content,
addressing any disparities and promoting the inclusion of various global
cultural perspectives in online spaces.

  * •

Context-Awareness: Global platforms are context-aware, adapting their
guidelines and content moderation practices to respect the unique cultural
contexts shaping global online discussions.

####  Environmental Stewardship

Globally:

  * •

Transparency: Global platforms transparently share information about
environmental stewardship efforts, utilizing online spaces to disseminate
knowledge and updates on international sustainability initiatives.

  * •

Fairness: Platforms promote fair and unbiased coverage of global environmental
issues, ensuring that discussions on environmental stewardship represent
diverse global perspectives and solutions.

  * •

Responsibility: Platforms take responsibility for encouraging positive global
environmental practices, actively engaging users in discussions and
initiatives that contribute to international environmental sustainability.

  * •

Equity: Platforms aim for equitable distribution of global environmental
information, addressing any disparities in access to discussions and resources
related to international environmental stewardship.

  * •

Context-Awareness: Global platforms are context-aware, adapting their approach
to global environmental discussions to consider the global and local contexts
shaping sustainability efforts.

####  Social Justice and Equality

Globally:

  * •

Transparency: Platforms transparently communicate efforts for global social
justice, utilizing online spaces to share information about international
initiatives and advocate for equality.

  * •

Fairness: Platforms work towards fair representation of diverse global social
perspectives, fostering an inclusive environment where discussions on global
social justice are free from biases.

  * •

Responsibility: Platforms take responsibility for addressing global social
inequalities, actively moderating content and discussions to promote a just
and equal global online space.

  * •

Equity: Platforms aim for equitable access to global social justice
discussions, recognizing and rectifying any global disparities resulting from
online and offline practices.

  * •

Context-Awareness: Platforms are context-aware, adapting their approach to
global social justice discussions to consider the unique global social
challenges and contexts influencing equality.

####  Healthcare Equity

Globally:

  * •

Transparency: Platforms transparently communicate about how global healthcare
practices consider and respect diverse cultural health beliefs, disseminating
information about inclusive healthcare initiatives worldwide.

  * •

Fairness: Platforms ensure fair integration of cultural values into global
healthcare discussions, fostering an online environment where healthcare
services are culturally sensitive and inclusive on a global scale.

  * •

Responsibility: Platforms take responsibility for promoting global healthcare
equity, actively engaging users in discussions and initiatives that address
cultural implications of global healthcare decisions and practices.

  * •

Equity: Platforms aim for equitable access to global healthcare discussions
and information, recognizing and rectifying any cultural biases in online and
offline global healthcare spaces.

  * •

Context-Awareness: Platforms are context-aware, adapting their healthcare
discussions to consider the unique global cultural contexts shaping health
beliefs and practices.

####  Education Access

Globally:

  * •

Transparency: Platforms transparently communicate efforts to promote global
education access, utilizing online spaces to share information about
international initiatives and progress in making education accessible
worldwide.

  * •

Fairness: Platforms ensure fair allocation of resources and opportunities for
global education access initiatives, fostering an online environment where all
users have equal chances to participate in global educational discussions.

  * •

Responsibility: Platforms take responsibility for implementing effective
global education access practices, actively contributing to inclusive
educational environments both online and offline on a global scale.

  * •

Equity: Platforms aim for equitable distribution of global educational
benefits, addressing any global disparities in the impact of online and
offline global education access practices.

  * •

Context-Awareness: Platforms are context-aware, adapting their approach to
global education access discussions to consider diverse learning needs and
cultural backgrounds on a global scale.

####  Economic Inclusivity

Globally:

  * •

Transparency: Platforms transparently communicate about how global economic
practices consider and respect diverse global economic models, disseminating
information about inclusive economic initiatives worldwide.

Fairness: Platforms ensure fair integration of diverse global economic models
into economic discussions, fostering an online environment where economic
opportunities are distributed without bias on a global scale.

  * •

Responsibility: Platforms take responsibility for promoting global economic
inclusivity, actively engaging users in discussions and initiatives that
address cultural implications of global economic decisions and practices.

  * •

Equity: Platforms aim for equitable access to global economic discussions and
benefits, recognizing and rectifying any cultural biases in online and offline
global economic spaces.

  * •

Context-Awareness: Platforms are context-aware, adapting their economic
discussions to consider local economic contexts and diverse cultural
perspectives in online and offline global settings.

####  Technological Ethics

Globally:

  * •

Transparency: Platforms transparently communicate about global technological
advancements, fostering open dialogue about how technology impacts diverse
cultures in online and offline spaces worldwide.

  * •

Fairness: Platforms ensure fair consideration of diverse global cultural
perspectives in technological discussions, striving for technology that is
designed without bias on a global scale.

  * •

Responsibility: Platforms take responsibility for ethical technology use
globally, actively contributing to the responsible development and deployment
of technology within diverse cultural contexts online and offline.

  * •

Equity: Platforms aim for equitable access to global technological benefits
for all cultural groups, addressing digital disparities and promoting
inclusive technology policies in both online and offline global spaces.

  * •

Context-Awareness: Platforms are context-aware, adapting their technological
discussions to consider the societal impact of technology on different
cultures in both online and offline global settings.

####  Political Accountability

Globally:

  * •

Transparency: Platforms transparently communicate about global political
processes, fostering open dialogue about the impact of politics on diverse
cultures in online and offline spaces worldwide.

  * •

Fairness: Platforms ensure fair consideration of diverse global political
perspectives in political discussions, striving for just and inclusive
political systems both online and offline.

  * •

Responsibility: Platforms take responsibility for political accountability
globally, actively contributing to transparent and accountable political
processes within diverse cultural contexts online and offline.

  * •

Equity: Platforms aim for equitable political representation for all cultural
groups in global political discussions, addressing political disparities and
promoting inclusive political policies both online and offline.

  * •

Context-Awareness: Platforms are context-aware, adapting their political
discussions to consider the political contexts of different cultures globally
and adapting political engagement to respect and integrate diverse cultural
perspectives.

####  Local, Inter-regional and International Collaboration

Globally:

  * •

Transparency: Platforms transparently communicate in collaborative efforts on
a global scale, fostering open dialogue about the goals, strategies, and
outcomes of collaborative initiatives across cultures in both online and
offline spaces.

  * •

Fairness: Platforms ensure fair consideration of diverse cultural perspectives
in collaborative initiatives, striving for equal representation and
contributions on a global scale both online and offline.

  * •

Responsibility: Platforms take responsibility for promoting collaborative
efforts that respect cultural diversity globally, actively contributing to
positive global collaborations both online and offline.

  * •

Equity: Platforms aim for equitable distribution of benefits and
responsibilities in collaborative initiatives globally, recognizing and
rectifying any cultural biases both online and offline.

  * •

Context-Awareness: Platforms are context-aware, adapting their collaboration
strategies to consider the cultural nuances and challenges in local, inter-
regional, and international contexts on a global scale both online and
offline.

###  8.11  Ethics over time, intergenerational ethics

####  Community Engagement and Communal Values

Over Time (Intergenerational):

  * •

Transparency: Over time, platforms facilitate transparent communication about
communal values, ensuring that information about historical perspectives on
communal values is accessible and openly discussed.

  * •

Fairness: Platforms strive for fairness by preserving historical communal
values and providing an inclusive space where different historical
perspectives contribute to the ongoing discussion.

  * •

Responsibility: Platforms take responsibility for maintaining a positive
historical community engagement environment, actively preserving and
moderating discussions to address any issues that may arise over time.

  * •

Equity: Platforms work towards equitable intergenerational participation,
ensuring that historical voices and perspectives have a place in the ongoing
dialogue about communal values.

  * •

Context-Awareness: Platforms are context-aware over time, adapting to the
changing cultural contexts and ensuring that historical perspectives are
respected within ongoing community engagement discussions.

####  Cultural Sensitivity

Over Time (Intergenerational):

  * •

Transparency: Platforms transparently communicate their commitment to cultural
sensitivity over time, providing guidelines on respectful interactions and
content sharing that considers evolving cultural perspectives.

  * •

Fairness: Platforms aim for fair representation and treatment of diverse
cultural content over time, fostering an environment where cultural
sensitivity is a continuous aspect of discussions across generations.

  * •

Responsibility: Platforms take responsibility for promoting cultural
sensitivity over time, actively preserving historical cultural content and
ensuring respectful interactions among users from different historical
cultural contexts.

  * •

Equity: Platforms work towards equitable access to cultural content over time,
addressing any disparities and promoting the inclusion of various historical
cultural perspectives in discussions.

  * •

Context-Awareness: Platforms are context-aware over time, adapting their
guidelines and content moderation practices to respect the changing cultural
nuances and diversity of perspectives within intergenerational discussions.

#### Environmental Stewardship

Over Time (Intergenerational):

  * •

Transparency: Platforms transparently share information about the evolution of
environmental stewardship efforts over time, utilizing online spaces to
disseminate knowledge and updates on the historical progression of
sustainability initiatives.

  * •

Fairness: Platforms promote fair and unbiased coverage of historical