[01:05] <cyphermox> I can haz a look at that
[01:07] <cyphermox> oh, cute, and the enddianness failure on s390x...
[02:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: clamsmtp (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.10-16ubuntu1 => 1.10-17ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[02:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted clamsmtp [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.10-17ubuntu1]
[05:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pocl (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1-4 => 1.1-5] (no packageset) (sync)
[05:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pocl [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.1-5]
[05:22] <slangasek> doko: solfege build failure is a segfault within initialization of /usr/lib/python3.6/lib-dynload/readline.cpython-36m-x86_64-linux-gnu.so, which seems somewhat improbable...
[05:46] <slangasek> doko: you're removing packages from -proposed that are not buggy and could become installable again if their dependencies were fixed in Debian?
[06:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: psortb (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.0.5+dfsg-1 => 3.0.5+dfsg-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[06:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted psortb [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.0.5+dfsg-1ubuntu1]
[06:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: psortb [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.0.5+dfsg-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[06:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: primer3 (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-1 => 2.4.0-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[06:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted primer3 [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-1ubuntu1]
[06:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kdelibs4support [source] (bionic-proposed) [5.44.0-0ubuntu2]
[06:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-session [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.0-0ubuntu4]
[06:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted poppler [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.62.0-2ubuntu1]
[06:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-session [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.0-0ubuntu4] (ubuntu-desktop)
[06:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-session [s390x] (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.0-0ubuntu4] (ubuntu-desktop)
[06:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-session [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.0-0ubuntu4] (ubuntu-desktop)
[06:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-session [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.0-0ubuntu4] (ubuntu-desktop)
[06:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pymoc (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.5.0-2 => 0.5.0-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[06:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pymoc [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.5.0-2ubuntu1]
[06:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-session [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.0-0ubuntu4] (ubuntu-desktop)
[06:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-session [armhf] (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.0-0ubuntu4] (ubuntu-desktop)
[06:56] <acheronuk> morning. could the kdeconnect FFe in unapproved be let through if convenient. thanks
[06:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libinput (bionic-proposed/main) [1.10.3-2 => 1.10.4-1] (desktop-core) (sync)
[07:03] <sil2100> Looking
[07:04] <sil2100> acheronuk: uh, did you put the wrong bug number for kdeconnect? Since the bug seems to point to krita
[07:05] <sil2100> acheronuk: if that's indeed a mistake, please re-upload with the same version number, I'll reject this one and approve the other
[07:05] <acheronuk> sil2100: could be. I had both open in tabs yesterday. thanks
[07:05] <sil2100> acheronuk: I'll look at the bug then ;)
[07:08] <sil2100> acheronuk: also, the kubuntu-settings upload - it sounds like it changes visible parts of the UI? I guess it would need an UIFe?
[07:08] <sil2100> (correct me if I'm wrong)
[07:11] <acheronuk> trivially, and I thought that was to ensure that UI did not change for people doing documentation for main ubuntu. this has zero impact on those issues
[07:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kdeconnect (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.2.1-0ubuntu2 => 1.3.0-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[07:16] <acheronuk> sil2100: we certainly have no documentation that promise whether we have that small separator or not
[07:16] <sil2100> acheronuk: ok, I must say I am not sure about flavour-specific changes myself
[07:16] <sil2100> So yeah, I guess we'll just slip it in
[07:17] <acheronuk> it is sort of a grey area. or at least debatable
[07:17] <acheronuk> thank. if it had been a bigger change affecting other things, I would have FFed or asked in advance
[07:18] <acheronuk> *thanks
[07:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected kdeconnect [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.3.0-0ubuntu1]
[07:18] <sil2100> (also, basically since you're from the Kubuntu team I'd anyway ACK your UIFe request ;) )
[07:19] <sil2100> Approved both, yw!
[07:19] <acheronuk> sil2100: did you see slangasek's comment on this yesterday?
[07:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cups [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.2.7-1ubuntu2]
[07:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kubuntu-settings [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:18.04ubuntu11]
[07:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kdeconnect [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.3.0-0ubuntu1]
[07:19] <acheronuk> regards kdeconnect ffe
[07:19] <acheronuk> [18:36] <slangasek> acheronuk: FFe approved.  Historically, flavors were allowed latitude in self-managing FFes for packages that were core parts of their image and that only they had seeded; perhaps we should discuss (but not just at this moment) getting back to that state, so that we don't need to be a bottleneck for you
[07:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted partman-md [sync] (bionic-proposed) [86]
[07:21] <acheronuk> sil2100: anyway. thank you :)
[07:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted budgie-desktop-environment [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.9.8]
[07:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted budgie-extras [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.4.4-0ubuntu1]
[07:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted hyphen-ru [source] (bionic-proposed) [20030310-1ubuntu3]
[07:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted myspell-hr [source] (bionic-proposed) [20060617-2.4ubuntu1]
[07:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-getting-started-docs [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.1-0ubuntu1]
[07:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-user-docs [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.1-0ubuntu1]
[07:23] <sil2100> acheronuk: I guess I didn't :) Yeah, I'd really like this to be made clear somewhere so that we don't cause unnecessary delays here and there
[07:23] <acheronuk> +1 there
[07:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-user-docs [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.1-0ubuntu1] (personal-gunnarhj, ubuntu-desktop)
[08:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pillow (bionic-proposed/main) [5.0.0-1 => 5.1.0-1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server) (sync)
[08:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-session [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.0-0ubuntu4]
[08:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-session [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.0-0ubuntu4]
[08:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-session [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.0-0ubuntu4]
[08:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-user-docs [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.1-0ubuntu1]
[08:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted psortb [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [3.0.5+dfsg-1ubuntu1]
[08:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-session [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.0-0ubuntu4]
[08:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-session [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.0-0ubuntu4]
[08:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gnome-session [i386] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.0-0ubuntu4]
[08:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pdbg [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [1.0-1ubuntu1]
[08:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-boxes [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.1-1]
[08:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pillow [sync] (bionic-proposed) [5.1.0-1]
[08:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libinput [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.10.4-1]
[08:57] <doko> slangasek: why would you want to keep buildN packages without binaries in proposed?
[08:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: enki-aseba (bionic-proposed/universe) [1:1.6.0-3 => 1:1.6.0-5] (no packageset) (sync)
[08:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted enki-aseba [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1:1.6.0-5]
[09:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-disk-utility (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.0-1ubuntu1 => 3.28.1-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[09:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ukui-session-manager (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.1-0ubuntu1 => 1.1.2-0ubuntu1] (ubuntukylin)
[09:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ristretto (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.8.2-1 => 0.8.2-1ubuntu1] (ubuntustudio, xubuntu)
[10:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pulseaudio (xenial-proposed/main) [1:8.0-0ubuntu3.8 => 1:8.0-0ubuntu3.9] (core)
[10:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: python-motor (bionic-proposed/primary) [1.2.1-1build1]
[10:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mongodb (bionic-proposed/universe) [1:3.4.7-1ubuntu4 => 1:3.4.14-3] (mozilla) (sync)
[10:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-motor [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.1-1build1]
[10:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-motor [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [1.2.1-1build1] (no packageset)
[10:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-motor [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.1-1build1]
[11:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: synfigstudio (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.2.1-0ubuntu3 => 1.2.1-0.1] (ubuntustudio) (sync)
[11:09] <LocutusOfBorg> can you please accept mongodb so I can upload my merge without the orig tarball? it timeouts
[11:10] <LocutusOfBorg> it has an FFe for 3.6 already acked
[11:10] <LocutusOfBorg> I'm just uploading a 3.4 merge in the meanwhile, to unblock python-motor
[11:14] <jbicha> LocutusOfBorg: please talk to rbasak about mongodb work. I think there was a reason he wasn't just syncing the Debian version yet
[11:14] <jbicha> oh never mind, I see there was already discussion
[12:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mongodb (bionic-proposed/universe) [1:3.4.7-1ubuntu4 => 1:3.4.14-3ubuntu1] (mozilla)
[12:36] <LocutusOfBorg> hurray mongodb uploaded
[12:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: r-cran-openssl (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.1-1 => 1.0.1-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[12:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted r-cran-openssl [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.1-1ubuntu1]
[13:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openoffice.org-hyphenation-pl (bionic-proposed/main) [1:3.0a-4 => 1:3.0a-4ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[13:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-report (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.5 => 1.0.6] (no packageset)
[13:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-report [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.6]
[14:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-report (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.6 => 1.0.7] (no packageset)
[14:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-report [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.7]
[14:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (bionic-proposed/partner) [1:20180313.1-0ubuntu1 => 1:20180410.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[14:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libreoffice (bionic-proposed/main) [1:6.0.2-0ubuntu1 => 1:6.0.3-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop)
[14:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-session (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.0-0ubuntu4 => 3.28.1-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[14:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libreoffice-l10n (bionic-proposed/main) [1:6.0.2-0ubuntu1 => 1:6.0.3-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[14:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: remmina (bionic-proposed/main) [1.2.0-rcgit.27+dfsg-4ubuntu1 => 1.2.0-rcgit.29+dfsg-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[14:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: r-cran-future (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.7.0-1 => 1.7.0-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[14:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted r-cran-future [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.7.0-1ubuntu1]
[14:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected mongodb [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1:3.4.14-3]
[14:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted synfigstudio [sync] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.1-0.1]
[14:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mongodb [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:3.4.14-3ubuntu1]
[14:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fastnetmon (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.3+dfsg-6 => 1.1.3+dfsg-6build1] (no packageset)
[14:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fastnetmon [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.3+dfsg-6build1]
[15:07] <slangasek> doko: I'm not talking about buildN packages.  You removed e.g. grafana-zabbix, which is not buggy but depends on a buggy package.  If grafana gets fixed in Debian, it will be synced and grafana-zabbix will become migratable with no source changes; but now grafana-zabbix is gone, and won't reappear automatically when grafana is fixed
[15:08] <cjwatson> FYI, I'm currently deploying a new Launchpad revision that adds InRelease etc. to by-hash directories
[15:08] <cjwatson> It looks fine in tests, and I'll keep an eye on it, but please let me know if you see weirdness in that general area
[15:10] <doko> ahh, I see. good, then looking at the new upstream =)
[15:11] <xnox> sil2100, last subiquity respin fails to build =( http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/cd-build-logs/ubuntu-server/bionic/daily-live-20180410.1.log -> no live filesystems build succeeded
[15:11] <xnox> and diggin into there https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-cdimage/+livefs/ubuntu/bionic/ubuntu-server-live/+build/129016
[15:11] <xnox> in https://launchpadlibrarian.net/364257125/buildlog_ubuntu_bionic_amd64_ubuntu-server-live_BUILDING.txt.gz shows that
[15:11] <xnox> + SNAPPY_STORE_NO_CDN=1 snap download core
[15:11] <xnox> 2018/04/10 12:47:07.907440 cmd.go:156: cannot read /proc/self/exe: readlink /proc/self/exe: no such file or directory
[15:12] <xnox> is this known? or need debugging / escalating? i guess something changed and snapd is no longer a happy camper inside lxd inside launchpad builder?
[15:14] <slangasek> doko: I don't care strongly about grafana-zabbix, but I've been avoiding removing such packages from -proposed as a policy
[15:14] <xnox> has all of zabbix been upgraded to support systemd as pid1? at one point it was upstart-only on ubuntu, and thus not working at all, and I thought all of zabbix needs removing
[15:20] <sil2100> xnox: hmmm
[15:20] <sil2100> xnox: looking, strange as I started it through nusakan so I'd expect it to work - let me see what I actually run
[15:21] <sil2100> Ah
[15:21] <sil2100> heh
[15:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: plasma-framework (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.44.0-0ubuntu2 => 5.44.0-0ubuntu3] (kubuntu)
[15:22] <acheronuk> I tested that patch for upstream code review, so please let through when convenient ^^^
[15:23] <sil2100> xnox: no idea why this is now failing and was not failing 7 hours ago, I guess you'll have to ask around ;)
[15:24] <slangasek> xnox: no clue about that, and again I don't care about this particular package ;)  I just care about knowing what rules we should follow when keeping or removing packages from -proposed, since that has implications for them coming back later
[15:28] <xnox> sil2100, or i guess the actuall error is:
[15:28] <xnox> xnox> error: received an unexpected http response code (503) when trying to download https://public.apps.ubuntu.com/download-origin/local/99T7MUlRhtI3U0QFgl5mXXESAiSwt776_4206.snap?sig=Ijk5VDdNVWxSaHRJM1UwUUZnbDVtWFhFU0FpU3d0Nzc2XzQyMDYuc25hcCI.Da44wA.PqfN1fhAv3tZT-1qaRnz5239kxg
[15:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity (bionic-proposed/main) [18.04.4 => 18.04.5] (core)
[15:34] <cyphermox> jibel: ^
[15:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: aseba (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.6.0-3 => 1.6.0-3ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[15:36] <cyphermox> slangasek: ubiquity in unapproved would need a review/approval if you have the time; this is the upload for your TTY fixes, as well as the zram fix
[15:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted aseba [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.6.0-3ubuntu1]
[15:38] <slangasek> cyphermox: accepted, thanks
[15:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubiquity [source] (bionic-proposed) [18.04.5]
[15:40] <jibel> cyphermox, thanks
[15:48] <cyphermox> ta
[15:59] <doko> is OpenGL supposed to work on arm64?
[16:02] <ginggs> would someone please 'force-badtest nanopolish/0.9.0-1/arm64 nanopolish/0.9.0-1/armhf nanopolish/0.9.0-1/ppc64el nanopolish/0.9.0-1/s390x' ? it is only built for amd64 and i386 now
[16:04] <LocutusOfBorg> doko, is context enki-aseba aseba? debian enabled OpenGL with latest qt in arm64, ubuntu didn't, probably because qt in bionic is too old? /cc tsimonq2
[16:05] <slangasek> doko: "ish".  Qt is built against GLES instead of GL, so it has a similar set of qt-related ANAIS as armhf
[16:06] <doko> aseba doesn't detect a working qt on arm64
[16:06] <slangasek> LocutusOfBorg: Ubuntu hasn't enabled OpenGL in arm64 specifically because OpenGLES is considered the more interesting target for Ubuntu arm64 targets
[16:06] <LocutusOfBorg> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/qtbase-opensource-src/5.9.4+dfsg-0ubuntu4
[16:06] <slangasek> LocutusOfBorg: unless you're saying that the new Qt can somehow do both
[16:06] <LocutusOfBorg> this? :)
[16:06] <LocutusOfBorg> slangasek, I vaguely remember something like this, but please don't take my words seriously
[16:07] <slangasek> (OpenGL support on arm64 in Qt in Debian is not new)
[16:07] <LocutusOfBorg> this is why I cc'd tsimonq2
[16:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: a7xpg (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.11.dfsg1-9build1 => 0.11.dfsg1-9ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[16:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted a7xpg [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.11.dfsg1-9ubuntu1]
[16:15]  * tsimonq2 bounces to mitya57
[16:16] <tsimonq2> I still need to learn why the graphics stack is the way it is irt arm and Qt.
[16:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-meta-gcp (bionic-proposed/main) [<IP_ADDRESS>3.4 => <IP_ADDRESS>3.5] (kernel)
[16:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-meta-gcp [source] (bionic-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>3.5]
[16:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wine-development (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.2-1 => 3.5-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[16:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wine-development [sync] (bionic-proposed) [3.5-1]
[16:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: simplestreams (artful-proposed/main) [0.1.0~bzr450-0ubuntu1 => 0.1.0~bzr450-0ubuntu1.1] (ubuntu-server)
[16:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dell-recovery (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.57 => 1.58] (no packageset)
[16:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: simplestreams (xenial-proposed/main) [0.1.0~bzr426-0ubuntu1.2 => 0.1.0~bzr426-0ubuntu1.3] (ubuntu-server)
[16:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dell-recovery [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.58]
[16:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pymoc (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.5.0-2ubuntu1 => 0.5.0-2ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[16:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pymoc [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.5.0-2ubuntu2]
[16:52] <doko> apw, please see https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/usbip/+bug/1723717
[16:52] <ubot5`> Ubuntu bug 1723717 in linux (Ubuntu) "Please remove from archives: usbip & usbip-source" [Undecided,New]
[16:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: patch (bionic-proposed/main) [2.7.6-1 => 2.7.6-2] (core) (sync)
[17:13] <mitya57> doko, tsimonq2: in Debian, aseba FTBFS with OpenGL ES too (see armhf). The only difference with Ubuntu is that we use OpenGL ES also on arm64.
[17:14] <mitya57> This upload is new, maybe the maintainer will fix that FTBFS soon.
[17:30] <doko> ok, then I'll remove the binary on arm64
[17:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libreoffice-l10n [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:6.0.3-0ubuntu1]
[17:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openoffice.org-hyphenation-pl [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:3.0a-4ubuntu1]
[17:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libreoffice [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:6.0.3-0ubuntu1]
[17:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted patch [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2.7.6-2]
[17:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: buildbot (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.1-3 => 1.1.1-3ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[17:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted buildbot [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.1-3ubuntu1]
[17:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ristretto [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.8.2-1ubuntu1]
[17:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-session [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.1-0ubuntu1]
[18:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: vte2.91 (bionic-proposed/main) [0.52.0-1ubuntu2 => 0.52.1-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[18:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: glib2.0 (bionic-proposed/main) [2.56.0-4ubuntu1 => 2.56.1-2ubuntu1] (core)
[18:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: aseba (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.6.0-3ubuntu1 => 1.6.0-3.1~build1] (no packageset)
[18:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted aseba [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.6.0-3.1~build1]
[18:15] <smoser> hi. could someone NACK the artful and xenial uploads of simplestreams please ?
[18:15] <nacc> smoser: are you going to upload again?
[18:16] <smoser> well, wolsen requested another cherry-pick
[18:16] <smoser> i've updated the merge prposal to have those
[18:16] <nacc> smoser: if in unapproved, you can re-upload the same version
[18:16] <smoser> i can, yes. but just more clear if we NACK what is there.
[18:16] <nacc> smoser: as the version hasn't been burned yet, and the SRU team should review the latest upload
[18:17] <smoser> but yeah. not burned.
[18:18] <nacc> smoser: yeah i agree with you, just not necessarily blocking you either
[18:18] <smoser> right
[18:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-terminal (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.0-1ubuntu1 => 3.28.1-1ubuntu1] (desktop-core)
[18:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: jellyfish (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.2.8-3 => 2.2.8-3build1] (no packageset)
[18:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: primer3 (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.4.0-1ubuntu1 => 2.4.0-1ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[18:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted jellyfish [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.2.8-3build1]
[18:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted primer3 [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.4.0-1ubuntu2]
[18:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (bionic-proposed) [1:20180410.1-0ubuntu1]
[18:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (trusty-proposed/partner) [1:20180313.1-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS> => 1:20180410.1-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>] (no packageset)
[18:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (xenial-proposed/partner) [1:20180313.1-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS> => 1:20180410.1-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>] (no packageset)
[18:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:20180410.1-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>]
[18:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adobe-flashplugin [source] (trusty-proposed) [1:20180410.1-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>]
[18:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-calculator (bionic-proposed/main) [1:3.28.0-1ubuntu1 => 1:3.28.1-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[20:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ruby-graphviz (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.2.3-1 => 1.2.3-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[20:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ruby-graphviz [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.3-1ubuntu1]
[20:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: buildbot (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.1-3ubuntu1 => 1.1.1-3ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[20:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted buildbot [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.1-3ubuntu2]
[21:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: software-properties (bionic-proposed/main) [<IP_ADDRESS> => <IP_ADDRESS>] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[21:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-mate-settings (bionic-proposed/universe) [18.04.14 => 18.04.15] (ubuntu-mate)
[21:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mate-desktop (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.20.1-1ubuntu1 => 1.20.1-1ubuntu2] (ubuntu-mate, ubuntukylin, xubuntu)
[21:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-builder (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.28.0-1ubuntu1 => 3.28.1-1ubuntu1] (desktop-extra)
[21:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: atril (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.20.1-2ubuntu1 => 1.20.1-2ubuntu2] (ubuntu-mate, ubuntukylin, xubuntu)
[21:50] <acheronuk> slangasek: we still have sddm starting with a minimum VT7. I guess your new ubiquity version will not like that?
[21:50]  * tsimonq2 volunteers to fix SDDM if that's the problem.
[21:51] <slangasek> acheronuk: I don't expect sddm to care.  It just means that if you run ubiquity-dm in 'maybe' mode, then choose 'try', you'll have a VT switch
[21:51] <slangasek> whereas since plymouth AFAIK is across the board on vt1 now, there's no advantage to starting ubiquity-dm on vt7
[21:52] <tsimonq2> slangasek: This commit was spotted earlier: https://packaging.neon.kde.org/3rdparty/sddm.git/commit/?h=Neon/unstable_bionic&id=4567d3f85cfc5ba0a594f4b5c547311be3275302
[21:52] <tsimonq2> We might need to cherry-pick it?
[21:52] <acheronuk> slangasek: well, I just rolled our own Kubuntu CI iso image, and the try/install screen now crashes and dumps you into the live session on VT7
[21:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: flashplugin-nonfree (bionic-proposed/multiverse) [<IP_ADDRESS>ubuntu1 => <IP_ADDRESS>ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[21:53] <acheronuk> so I'm jumping the gun on our daily iso build right now to test
[21:53] <slangasek> acheronuk: I don't know of any reason why this change would cause it to crash.  Where can I poke at your image?
[21:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted flashplugin-nonfree [source] (bionic-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>ubuntu1]
[21:53] <acheronuk> slangasek: http://kci.pangea.pub/images/iso_bionic_stable_amd64/current/
[21:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-initial-setup (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.28.0-2ubuntu1 => 3.28.0-2ubuntu2] (ubuntugnome)
[21:55] <acheronuk> it is one with CI packages (though stable branches) so it could be something else causing the crash
[21:55] <acheronuk> but I tested as it's one I can just spin up
[21:56] <acheronuk> tsimonq2: yeah. if that commit is sane, may be worth taking
[22:01] <slangasek> acheronuk, tsimonq2: yes, that sddm commit looks reasonable to take, but I also don't want to have flavors individually chasing down post-beta damage caused by a change that shouldn't have broken things; so I'm still going to dig on that side
[22:02] <tsimonq2> slangasek: OK.
[22:02] <tsimonq2> Thank you.
[22:03] <slangasek> doko: the openfoam/ppc64el build failure is confusing me, I have failed to reproduce it on diamond but it's reproducible in LP.  does this smell like an OOM to you?
[22:09] <doko> priotized https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/test-rebuild-20180408/+build/14609269 and https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/test-rebuild-20180408-gcc8/+build/14704137
[22:09] <doko> let's see
[22:10] <doko> slangasek: how much memory are the cc1plus processes consuming?
[22:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: buildbot (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1.1-3ubuntu2 => 1.1.1-3ubuntu3] (no packageset)
[22:14] <slangasek> doko: don't know. what's a good way to check the high watermark on this?
[22:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted buildbot [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.1-3ubuntu3]
[22:14] <doko> watching top?
[22:15] <doko> if I would know a better way, I would like to see that printed out at the end of each build in the log
[22:17] <tsimonq2> You mean htop? :P
[22:17]  * tsimonq2 runs
[22:18] <wxl> neither of them will help with logging
[22:20] <doko> build failure with gcc8, so that doesn't help
[22:21] <doko> I love that gnome-shell-pomodoro autopkg test ... running for 93h now
[22:23] <doko> slangasek: I removed the primer3 binaries on s390x, however the autopkg tests are still run. what am I doing wrong?
[22:27] <slangasek> doko: cc1plus looks to be around 425MB each for openfoam, but who knows if that's the highwater mark.  and maybe I should just speculatively change it to -O2
[22:27] <slangasek> doko: primer3> probably the problem is that there are arch: all packages from the source, so it probably needs hinted badtest
[22:28] <acheronuk> slangasek: real Kubuntu iso respin also crashes straight to live session: http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/kubuntu/daily-live/20180410.1/
[22:28] <acheronuk> caveat - that is in a VM
[22:29] <acheronuk> slangasek: this morning's iso works fine
[22:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: vim (bionic-proposed/main) [2:8.0.1401-1ubuntu3 => 2:8.0.1453-1ubuntu1] (core) (sync)
[22:31] <doko> mdeslaur: your patch sync ftbfs
[22:31] <slangasek> one the words in the previous line is a package name
[22:32] <doko> =)
[22:33] <doko> why can't I give back update-notifier on armhf? "You submitted an invalid request: update-notifier/3.190 is not published in bionic"
[22:36] <slangasek> doko: an unusual error message; what I see is update-notifier 3.190 is built on armhf
[22:44] <LocutusOfBorg> oh I was looking at the same update-notifier message
[22:45] <acheronuk> slangasek: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/4bjQgJg9pv/
[22:46] <doko> slangasek: re openfoam, you could limit the parallel build to two cpus as well
[22:46] <LocutusOfBorg> doko, I don't know how you did fix aseba, but the reason for the failure were in enki-aseba being qt4, so I reverted your upload and "fixed" it (actually your change has been subsequent to enki-aseba sync/publish, this is maybe why you thought the linking order was a fix?)
[22:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-initial-setup (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.28.0-2ubuntu1 => 3.28.0-2ubuntu3] (ubuntugnome)
[22:54] <slangasek> doko: lala, just found this in debian/rules: # Limit parallel build to 3 processes on Ubuntu amd64 and arm64
[22:55] <doko> slangasek: seriously, we should fix the buildd infrastructure, not the packaging
[22:55] <slangasek> we don't agree that this is broken infrastructure
[22:56] <doko> if you think that building with the same limits (or even lower ones) as four or five years ago ...
[22:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openfoam (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.1+dfsg1-1build2 => 4.1+dfsg1-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[22:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openfoam [source] (bionic-proposed) [4.1+dfsg1-1ubuntu1]
[22:59] <mdeslaur> doko: UGH, thanks.
[23:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (bionic-proposed/main) [2.518 => 2.519] (desktop-core)
[23:03] <tsimonq2> Somebody could sync nodejs if they wanted to. Won't be me. :P
[23:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.519]
[23:05] <doko> tsimonq2: are you comitted to fix all the autopkg test failures?
[23:05] <tsimonq2> doko: As I said, won't be me. :P
[23:06]  * doko curses the person who synced that from experimental
[23:08] <nacc> that would be tsimonq2, no? :)
[23:08] <slangasek> acheronuk: and that failure is consistently reproducible on boot?  any indication of why the X server died?
[23:08] <tsimonq2> nacc: shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
[23:08] <tsimonq2> I knew soon after the fact that it was a *horrible* mistake.
[23:08] <nacc> tsimonq2: it doesn't appear to be that important to sync
[23:09] <slangasek> tsimonq2: did you learn not to do it for next time? ;)
[23:09] <nacc> heh
[23:09] <tsimonq2> nacc, slangasek: This is why I'm casually suggesting it over IRC, so someone *else* can deal with the absolute mess that nodejs is.
[23:09] <tsimonq2> :P
[23:10] <slangasek> tsimonq2: I mean about not starting /new/ transitions for language ecosystems by syncing from experimental
[23:10] <slangasek> :)
[23:10] <acheronuk> slangasek: so far has crashed every time. that is all the output in syslog just before and after
[23:10] <tsimonq2> slangasek: Yes, that. ;)
[23:11] <slangasek> acheronuk: there may be X logs separately; or systemd journal entries for the ubiquity service (journalctl --no-pager -lu ubiquity.service)
[23:13] <tsimonq2> slangasek: I learned that next time I sync something starting a new transition, it should be in Gianfranco's name. :P
[23:13] <tsimonq2> Imeanwhat.
[23:13] <tsimonq2> (I'm kidding, of course. :P)
[23:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: patch (bionic-proposed/main) [2.7.6-2 => 2.7.6-2ubuntu1] (core)
[23:16] <acheronuk> slangasek: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/WQh9z3Fzh5/
[23:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gnome-initial-setup [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.28.0-2ubuntu2]
[23:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted vim [sync] (bionic-proposed) [2:8.0.1453-1ubuntu1]
[23:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted patch [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.7.6-2ubuntu1]
[23:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ukui-session-manager [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.2-0ubuntu1]
[23:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted atril [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.20.1-2ubuntu2]
[23:17] <slangasek> acheronuk: so if you, say, try to run 'service ubiquity start', what happens?  Is it reproducible post-boot?
[23:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-mate-settings [source] (bionic-proposed) [18.04.15]
[23:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mate-desktop [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.20.1-1ubuntu2]
[23:21] <acheronuk> slangasek: seems to fail the same
[23:21] <doko> slangasek: please could you consider overriding the snapd/i386 autopkg test failure? according to #snappy that doesn't appear in their own testing, and it looks completely unrelated to git
[23:25] <slangasek> acheronuk: well good news, that means you should be able to debug it and get some logs then? :)  you probably want to 'service sddm stop' before you try to get any logs though, otherwise you could have conflicts with the already-running X server
[23:27] <acheronuk> slangasek: if I 'sudo service sddm stop' then 'sudo service ubiquity start' ubiquity-dm starts without a crash
[23:28] <acheronuk> and I land on the try/install screen
[23:32] <tsimonq2> slangasek: Spanish is messed up as well: bug 1754646.
[23:32] <ubot5`> bug 1754646 in debian-installer (Ubuntu Bionic) "Texts in the dialogue in Swedish is faulty in Lubuntu alternate Bionic beta 1" [Critical,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1754646
[23:33] <slangasek> acheronuk: hmph ok
[23:33] <slangasek> acheronuk: I think I'll need to boot it here to get a handle on it
[23:33] <slangasek> (as opposed to just digging around on the fs)
[23:33] <acheronuk> slangasek: now, while I was doing all this, I applied that sddm VT change, uploaded a package to our Kubuntu CI PPA, and rolled a new iso when it published
[23:34] <slangasek> tsimonq2: yes, it's a language-agnostic bug
[23:34] <acheronuk> which now boots ok!
[23:34] <acheronuk> this could of course be completely coincidence!
[23:34] <acheronuk> but.....
[23:34] <tsimonq2> slangasek: OK.
[23:40] <acheronuk> slangasek: it would be handing is we could do test rebuilds of official images, adding a PPA source with a test package like new sddm
[23:40] <acheronuk> s/handing/handy
[23:40] <doko> Laney: there is a doc-rfc autopkg test failure blocking your poppler upload
[23:42] <acheronuk> slangasek: 12:40 am here, so I am going to have to give up for the day shortly
[23:43] <acheronuk> tsimonq2: if a new sddm upload can fix this, can you sort that please?
[23:43] <tsimonq2> acheronuk: Affirmative.
[23:44] <acheronuk> tsimonq2: in fact, if the change is good going forward, maybe just do it anyway
[23:45] <tsimonq2> acheronuk: ok
[23:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-software (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.0-0ubuntu7 => 3.28.1-0ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)


[20:21] <pjconnect> Anyone available to answer a question about Xubuntu?
[20:22] <diogenes_> pjconnect, you never know until you ask
[20:24] <pjconnect> I'd like to verify the signature of Xubuntu ISO ; how-to obtain the public key from the Xubuntu key server ;
[20:25] <pjconnect> I mean what is the server URI ; are the ISO file sign with the ubuntu key server ?


[17:50] <notlistening> Hi I have just updates and mythweb has died on me is there any clues as to fault finding?
[17:54] <notlistening> I have check /var/log/mythtv & apache2
[17:56] <tgm4883> notlistening, define died, I would check the backend log and the apache2 logs
[18:01] <notlistening> There is nothing in both, and died just means it redirects to a blank page no source for the page at all
[18:02] <notlistening> someone has mentioned to me about php bindings
[18:03] <Shadow__X> did mythweb update successfully?
[18:08] <notlistening> there does not seem to have been a mythweb update
[18:08] <Shadow__X> did you use autobuilds?
[18:08] <Shadow__X> to update
[18:09] <notlistening> yeah i did
[18:09] <Shadow__X> what did you update from?
[18:09] <Shadow__X> did you go from .23 to .24 or was it a -fixes update
[18:09] <Shadow__X> normally mythweb gets updated
[18:10] <notlistening> I have the mythbuntu repository added and just performed a normal system update
[18:10] <notlistening> was a fixes update
[18:11] <Shadow__X> tgm4883: any ideas?
[18:20] <tgm4883> I'd have to check it on my own system
[18:20] <tgm4883> I'm assuming that apache is started?
[18:57] <notlistening> yes it is redirecting to /mythweb but giving nothing more
[19:26] <notlistening> any ideas of something to try?
[19:43] <fwest> what remote should i get for least grief getting to working?
[21:01] <notlistening> tgm4883, any further ideas?
[21:09] <notlistening> right mythweb is still borked, no log messages the mythubuntu guys are everso quiet... any food for thought?
[21:12] <notlistening> when browing tot the mythweb interface there is no backend interaction
[21:13] <dekarl> you could check: ls -l /etc/apache2/sites-*
[21:13] <dekarl> maybe the link is missing or something
[21:15] <dekarl> Nothing in apache logs means you don't see the request? Then I'd check the network and client logs
[21:16] <notlistening> the access log show the apache request
[21:17] <dekarl> but it's status 200 or 304?
[21:17] <dekarl> (ok or not changed)
[21:21] <notlistening> 1 sec
[21:21] <notlistening> "GET /mythweb/ HTTP/1.1" 500 274 "-" "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:6.0.2) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/6.0.2"
[21:22] <notlistening> nothing more
[21:22] <dekarl> 500 = internal server error = no good
[21:23] <dekarl> /var/log/apache2/error.log is empty?
[21:25] <notlistening> since a restart nothing
[21:26] <dekarl> hmm, I'm out of quick suggestions (besides looking at whatever ls -lrt /var/log hints at) gotta go, need to work tomorrow.
[21:27] <notlistening> thanks though
[21:30] <notlistening> here is my apache error.log http://pastebin.com/zC09vbDS


[15:36] <SamSpaces> Hi all, I've noticed a process called Rpigdnos. It returns after killing and deletion from /bin. Any ideas what that is?
[15:42] <TJ-> SamSpaces: is this a publicly available system?
[15:44] <TJ-> SamSpaces: check its parent process;  anaylse *all* running processes and exectuable paths; some other process may be restarting it as a randomly named process. The name doesn't match any file in the archives, so it is likely some form or malicious process, possibly part of a root-kit exploit
[15:45] <SamSpaces> Thanks for the reply. It's a digitalocean server. I've rebooted with firewall now, checking if it's still there.
[15:45] <SamSpaces> Hm, yes, still active
[15:46] <SamSpaces> it takes up 100% cpu too
[15:48] <SamSpaces> parent process is /sbin/init
[15:49] <SamSpaces> Oh sorry, it's not a server, it's a droplet.
[16:10] <SamSpaces> Ok, Rpigdnos is as malicious program probably, no references what so ever, so to anyone who wants the scoop, now is your chance :)
[16:43] <TJ-> SamSpaces: found out anything more about it?
[16:54] <SamSpaces> I've managed to clear my system of it. I created another older droplet, copied the /sbin/init to the infected droplet, removed the init file, deleted the program in /bin, overwrote /sbin/init with the clean version and rebooted.
[16:55] <TJ-> SamSpaces: you should  investigate how it got itself installed and launched, that sounds like an init system compromise
[16:56] <SamSpaces> I mess around a lot with crypto currency wallets. I know I shouldn't run them as root, so, that's a bit dumb, I know. But the culprit is most likely a crypto wallet.
[17:10] <Guest58677>  wats +5519994589853 hacking
[20:23] <JanC> seems like SamSpaces is not the only one: http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:RqrdyvB6TTwJ:https://forums.aws.amazon.com/thread.jspa?threadID%3D219865
[20:25] <JanC> and "Rpigdnos" might not be too random...