[00:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-7 [i386] (artful-proposed/main) [7.1.0-3ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[00:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-7 [amd64] (artful-proposed/main) [7.1.0-3ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[00:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-7 [arm64] (artful-proposed/main) [7.1.0-3ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[01:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-7 [armhf] (artful-proposed/main) [7.1.0-3ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[06:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-7 [amd64] (artful-proposed) [7.1.0-3ubuntu1]
[06:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-7 [armhf] (artful-proposed) [7.1.0-3ubuntu1]
[06:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-7 [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [7.1.0-3ubuntu1]
[06:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-caseless [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.12.0-1]
[06:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-7 [arm64] (artful-proposed) [7.1.0-3ubuntu1]
[06:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-7 [s390x] (artful-proposed) [7.1.0-3ubuntu1]
[06:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-7 [i386] (artful-proposed) [7.1.0-3ubuntu1]
[08:49] <LocutusOfBorg> apw, can you please unblock virtualbox* for yakkety and zesty too?
[08:49] <LocutusOfBorg> testing was good to me
[09:01] <LocutusOfBorg> (some more testing from people here might be appreciated btw :p)
[09:03] <LocutusOfBorg> ok, I need some opinion here
[09:03] <LocutusOfBorg> http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/b/beets/artful/i386
[09:03] <LocutusOfBorg> I know why it fails, but I don't know how to fix
[09:03] <LocutusOfBorg> basically the test does something like that: touch file, chmod -w file, echo "foo" > file, and it should raise an exception
[09:04] <LocutusOfBorg> the problem is: testsuite is ran as root, so even if the file is not writable, the write works
[09:04] <LocutusOfBorg> Laney, ^^ do we have a way to say "hey testsuite, don't ran as root!" or maybe we can just disable such test and forward upstream...
[09:05] <ginggs> tumbleweed: ^^
[09:05] <LocutusOfBorg> s/ran/run
[09:08] <LocutusOfBorg> if you want to see the python magic: https://sources.debian.net/src/beets/1.3.19-2.1/test/test_library.py/#L1087
[09:10] <LocutusOfBorg> a good question might also be: why autopkgtests run as root on i386 and not elsewhere?
[09:14] <infinity> LocutusOfBorg: Run the tests under su to nobody?
[09:14] <infinity> LocutusOfBorg: As for i386 versus amd64, they should be identical setups, just different arches.
[09:16] <LocutusOfBorg> su nobody
[09:16] <LocutusOfBorg> This account is currently not available.
[09:17] <infinity> LocutusOfBorg: su -c "test command" nobody
[09:17] <infinity> Possibly with a -s /bin/sh as well.
[09:17] <LocutusOfBorg> infinity, they maybe have some stricter acls on i386? I don't understand otherwise, I can reproduce the exact failure in a pbuilder login environment, while I can't on pbuilder build (because of different LOGNAME)
[09:17] <LocutusOfBorg> let me double check
[09:22] <infinity> LocutusOfBorg: I get failures running as nobody too, so...
[09:22] <LocutusOfBorg> with user nobody I can't even write the python eggs
[09:23] <infinity> Where are you expecting to write?
[09:28] <LocutusOfBorg> CURDIR/build/home
[09:29] <LocutusOfBorg> I'm doing some chown before the test, lets see
[09:30] <infinity> su -m -s /bin/sh -c "$python -m unittest discover -p 'test_*'" nobody 2>&1
[09:30] <infinity> That basically works for me, minus two failing tests.
[09:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: gcc-7-cross (artful-proposed/primary) [3ubuntu1]
[09:32] <LocutusOfBorg> actually I was trying to do this in debian/rules
[09:32] <LocutusOfBorg> because also the build fails as root user
[09:33] <Laney> https://paste.ubuntu.com/24510202/
[09:33] <Laney> Totally not running as root.
[09:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: gcc-7-cross-ports (artful-proposed/primary) [0ubuntu1]
[09:34] <Laney> That's Restrictions: needs-root
[09:34] <infinity> Righto.
[09:34] <infinity> So, bad science abounds. ;)
[09:34] <LocutusOfBorg> yes, but it is an user who can write a file that has no -w bit set
[09:35] <LocutusOfBorg> (unless I'm missing something obvious about python)
[09:35] <Laney> how do you get that from<EMAIL_ADDRESS>?
[09:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-7-cross-ports [source] (artful-proposed) [0ubuntu1]
[09:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-7-cross [source] (artful-proposed) [3ubuntu1]
[09:37] <LocutusOfBorg> I explained above how I tried to reproduce, but probably the testsuite fails a lot in different places
[09:37] <infinity> Curiously, the tests run fine here manually. :/
[09:37] <infinity> (As the same unprivileged user who owns the unpacked tree)
[09:37] <infinity> As nobody, they fail in ways different from the adt log.
[09:38] <LocutusOfBorg> this adt log smells a log debian bug: #855092
[09:38] <ubot5`> Debian bug 855092 in src:beets "beets: FTBFS randomly (failing tests)" [Important,Open] http://bugs.debian.org/855092
[09:38] <infinity> LocutusOfBorg: Yup, that build log matches the test failure.
[09:38] <infinity> https://people.debian.org/~sanvila/build-logs/beets/beets_1.3.19-2.1_amd64-20170212T170130Z
[09:39] <LocutusOfBorg> so, I was debugging a totally different issue
[09:41] <Laney> well at least you found an envionment that makes it not so random :P
[09:41] <infinity> Heh.
[09:41] <infinity> And locally, I've run it 10 times without failure.
[09:41] <LocutusOfBorg> :/
[09:42] <LocutusOfBorg> (I'm importing the new upstream release, maybe they fixed such tests and added some more broken ones)
[09:42] <Laney> using autopkgtest-virt-qemu?
[09:42] <infinity> Laney: Nah, just in an schroot.
[09:42] <Laney> 'kay
[09:42] <infinity> Laney: But then again, that was the reproducer in the bug too (via sbuild).
[09:42] <Laney> LocutusOfBorg: You can trigger the autopkgtests from a PPA
[09:43] <infinity> I'm going to go back to being on vacation and not caring.
[09:43] <Laney> So, a way to test fixes is to upload there and then issue an i386 test request for the PPA
[09:47] <LocutusOfBorg> Laney, how? :)
[09:47] <LocutusOfBorg>  ppa:costamagnagianfranco/locutusofborg-ppa has the upcoming new release
[09:47] <Laney> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ProposedMigration#Testing_against_a_PPA
[09:48] <LocutusOfBorg> ta
[09:58] <LocutusOfBorg> the new release requires new stuff
[10:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-7-cross-ports [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[10:45] <LocutusOfBorg> Laney, I'm lost, I just would like to see sphinx migrate, and this package is a blocker, what do you suggest? I don't have time/care about fixing such imprevedible, and hacky testsuites failures
[10:50] <ginggs> LocutusOfBorg: why not disable only test_no_write_permission ?
[11:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qtbase-opensource-src (xenial-proposed/main) [5.5.1+dfsg-16ubuntu7.4 => 5.5.1+dfsg-16ubuntu7.5] (kubuntu, qt5, ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[11:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-parallel-tree-search [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.4.1-1] (no packageset)
[11:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-create-ecdh [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [4.0.0-1] (no packageset)
[11:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-parallel-tree-search [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.4.1-1] (no packageset)
[11:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-is-binary-path [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [2.0.0-1] (no packageset)
[11:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: node-hawk [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [6.0.1+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[11:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-parallel-tree-search [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.4.1-1] (no packageset)
[11:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-parallel-tree-search [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.4.1-1] (no packageset)
[11:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pass-extension-tail [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [1.1.0-1] (no packageset)
[11:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-parallel-tree-search [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.4.1-1] (no packageset)
[11:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-parallel-tree-search [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.4.1-1] (no packageset)
[11:15] <doko> apw<EMAIL_ADDRESS>[11:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-parallel-tree-search [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.4.1-1]
[11:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-parallel-tree-search [armhf] (artful-proposed) [0.4.1-1]
[11:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-parallel-tree-search [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [0.4.1-1]
[11:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-create-ecdh [amd64] (artful-proposed) [4.0.0-1]
[11:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-is-binary-path [amd64] (artful-proposed) [2.0.0-1]
[11:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-parallel-tree-search [arm64] (artful-proposed) [0.4.1-1]
[11:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-parallel-tree-search [s390x] (artful-proposed) [0.4.1-1]
[11:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pass-extension-tail [amd64] (artful-proposed) [1.1.0-1]
[11:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-parallel-tree-search [i386] (artful-proposed) [0.4.1-1]
[11:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted node-hawk [amd64] (artful-proposed) [6.0.1+dfsg-1]
[11:17] <apw> doko, yes, i am aware of that one, i am looking at it now
[11:17] <doko> I don't think the new libgcc1 is causing that ...
[11:18] <apw> doko, no that is a new kernel-wedge almost cirtainly
[11:37] <tjaalton> infinity: I'm prepping hwe-16.04 stack again. the master bug is https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libinput/+bug/1687981
[11:37] <ubot5`> Ubuntu bug 1687981 in xorg-server-hwe-16.04 (Ubuntu Xenial) "Backport packages for 16.04.3 HWE stack" [Undecided,New]
[11:54] <LocutusOfBorg> ginggs, it fails on autopkgtests for other issues
[11:54] <LocutusOfBorg> feel free to further investigate :)
[11:55] <infinity> tjaalton: Not sure it's reasonable to expect a debhelper backport for this. :/
[11:56] <tjaalton> meh
[11:56] <infinity> tjaalton: The test case for a debhelper backport ("rebuild the archive and make sure nothing with a debian/compat <= 9 regresses in any way") is a bit much.
[11:57] <tjaalton> quite a few packages migrated to it already
[11:58] <infinity> tjaalton: We can talk about it more when I'm back from VAC, and get some other voices to weigh in perhaps, but my initial reaction is "hell no".
[11:59] <tjaalton> infinity: ok, I'll prep the ppa with a "yes" in the meantime ;)
[11:59] <tjaalton> almost done anyway
[12:03] <infinity> tjaalton: A potentially workable solution could be backporting it as "debhelper10", so all you need to do is change your "Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 10)" to "Build-Depends: debhelper10"
[12:03] <infinity> tjaalton: That would side-step the possiblity of dh10 breaking anything already shipped in xenial.
[12:03] <tjaalton> infinity: yeah, doable
[12:04] <tjaalton> it needs newer dh-autoreconf though. and that needs to be built first, otherwise debhelper is not installable..
[12:04] <tjaalton> at least ppa's get screwed
[12:04] <infinity> Well, same story.
[12:05] <infinity> We can just backport that whole packaging stack with new names.
[12:05] <infinity> Lord help us if any of it also needs a new dpkg-dev.
[12:05] <tjaalton> heh, no
[12:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected dh-autoreconf [source] (xenial-proposed) [12~ubuntu16.04.2]
[12:54] <ginggs> would someone please rm deepnano:armhf from artful-proposed?  it built where it is not installable
[13:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected gcc-7-cross-ports [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [0ubuntu1]
[13:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-7-cross [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [3ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[14:04] <tjaalton> infinity: looks like it's not too hard to script the x stack to use debhelper 9, and the rest I'll handle manually
[14:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: libxfont1 (xenial-proposed/primary) [1:1.5.2-4~ubuntu16.04.1~1]
[14:07] <tjaalton> oops
[14:08] <tjaalton> wrong target :P
[14:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected gcc-7-cross [arm64] (artful-proposed) [3ubuntu1]
[14:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected libxfont1 [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:1.5.2-4~ubuntu16.04.1~1]
[15:09] <doko> infinity, Laney: please override the failing linux autopkg test triggered by gcc-7 (see above chat with apw)
[15:17] <nacc> slangasek: ok, looks like r-d  has settled as of this morning, I'm working on the three r-b-d today and we should be able to remove src:php7.0 after that
[15:25] <Laney> doko: apw's on the release team too so can do that himself if he thinks it's correct
[15:25] <Laney> assuming he's around
[15:25]  * apw looks up, huh ?
[15:26] <Laney> hey
[15:26] <Laney> :P
[15:29]  * apw hints it ... it isn't going to get better today
[15:29] <Laney> is this something to do with the 12h test run that I can see?
[15:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-7-cross-ports [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [0ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[15:51] <slangasek> nacc: wahoo
[15:53] <slangasek> bdmurray: can I ask you to evaluate unattended-upgrades/precise for sru releasing today?
[15:54] <nacc> slangasek: oh and i found a real bug in xdebug apparently :) waiting on upstream for the fix
[15:59] <slangasek> bdmurray: also, what do you think about releasing software-properties/yakkety today?  it's 1 day early but as I've held off on applying the SRU back to earlier releases until we can see how it holds up in yakkety, I'm keen to get it into -updates and get more feedback
[15:59] <slangasek> (which will hopefully be no feedback other than a drop in bug reports)
[16:07] <bdmurray> slangasek: The current yakkety SRU isn't fully phased because of https://errors.ubuntu.com/problem/01a945aed47dfff0cdfea51c5923f51cadeafb00 which has a corresponding bug.
[16:07] <slashd_> infinity, good morning, I have uploaded the openssl patch (including 32-bit as discussed) for Openssl to work on AMD cpu with intel sha extension. Since you are already aware about this LP would you have moment to do the verification in X/Y/Z upload queue ? (LP: #1674399). Thanks in advance
[16:07] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 1674399 in openssl (Ubuntu Zesty) "OpenSSL CPU detection for AMD Ryzen CPUs" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1674399
[16:10] <bdmurray> slangasek: Its not really a blocker though
[16:12] <slangasek> bdmurray: ok, was just trying to figure that out; did the previous SRU change that code?
[16:13] <bdmurray> slangasek: Yes, the SRU added code to raise the ShortcutException but didn't think about .crash files.
[16:16] <slangasek> ok
[16:18] <slangasek> bdmurray: does that mean you plan to release it?  Do we need to assign a bug to xnox to fix the crash to make sure that's followed through on?
[16:18] <xnox> ai?
[16:18] <xnox> que?
[16:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nagios-nrpe (xenial-proposed/main) [2.15-1ubuntu1 => 2.15-1ubuntu1.1] (ubuntu-server)
[16:19] <bdmurray> slangasek: I'm fine with looking at releasing the new version but think somebody (xnox!) should look at the bug I opened.
[16:20] <slashd_> ^ bdmurray, Could you please look at LP: #1555258 if you have a moment today ? The patch is in upload queue for Z and X and I will do Y this week-end or next week (between the 2 sprints). I got the approval from security team (tyhicks/mdeslaur) before proceeding, it's all documented in the LP bug itself. thanks in advanced
[16:20] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 1555258 in nagios-nrpe (Ubuntu Zesty) "Request contained command arguments" [Medium,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1555258
[16:21] <bdmurray> slangasek: The unattended-upgrades SRU seems fine to release is anybody going to be keeping an eye out of issues? (I don't think there'd be any but still...)
[16:22] <slangasek> bdmurray: issues w/ unattended-upgrades, myself or dpb1 or ahasenack
[16:23] <bdmurray> slangasek: ack
[16:26] <slangasek> xnox: the bug on software-properties that's a fresh crash introduced by the SRU
[16:29] <xnox> fun
[16:29] <xnox> yes please assign to me
[16:30] <nacc> slangasek: is there a goto foundations person for systemd questions right now? not any work, just need some verification of some functionality (re: LP: #1576341)
[16:30] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 1576341 in systemd (Ubuntu) "systemd in degraded state on startup in LXD containers" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1576341
[16:33] <slangasek> nacc: xnox or rbalint should be good starting points
[16:33] <nacc> slangasek: thanks
[16:36] <bdmurray> slangasek: Do we still an open task on bug 1687129?
[16:36] <ubot5`> bug 1687129 in unattended-upgrades (Ubuntu) "Needs to allow updates from the ESM archive" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1687129
[16:38] <slangasek> bdmurray: there are packages in the queue for !precise, and hmm if I didn't already upload to artful I'll take care of that this week
[17:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mesa (zesty-proposed/main) [17.0.3-1ubuntu1 => 17.0.5-0ubuntu1~17.04.1] (core, xorg)
[18:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-7-cross [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [3ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[18:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gdm3 [source] (zesty-proposed) [3.24.1-0ubuntu0.1]
[18:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gdm3 [source] (yakkety-proposed) [3.20.1-1ubuntu2.1]
[18:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gdm3 [source] (xenial-proposed) [3.18.3-0ubuntu2.1]
[18:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nagios-nrpe [source] (zesty-proposed) [3.0.1-3ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>]
[18:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-7-cross [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [3ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[18:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dlm [amd64] (artful-proposed/main) [4.0.7-1ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[18:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dlm [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/main) [4.0.7-1ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[18:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dlm [i386] (artful-proposed/main) [4.0.7-1ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[18:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dlm [arm64] (artful-proposed/main) [4.0.7-1ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[18:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dlm [s390x] (artful-proposed/main) [4.0.7-1ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[18:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dlm [armhf] (artful-proposed/main) [4.0.7-1ubuntu2] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[19:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: sassphp [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.5.10-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[19:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: sassphp [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.5.10-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[19:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: sassphp [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.5.10-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[19:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: sassphp [arm64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.5.10-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[19:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: sassphp [armhf] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.5.10-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[19:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: sassphp [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [0.5.10-2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[19:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (trusty-proposed/main) [3.13.0-119.166] (core, kernel)
[19:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected gcc-7-cross-ports [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [0ubuntu2]
[19:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dlm [amd64] (artful-proposed) [4.0.7-1ubuntu2]
[19:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dlm [armhf] (artful-proposed) [4.0.7-1ubuntu2]
[19:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dlm [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [4.0.7-1ubuntu2]
[19:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sassphp [amd64] (artful-proposed) [0.5.10-2ubuntu1]
[19:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sassphp [armhf] (artful-proposed) [0.5.10-2ubuntu1]
[19:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sassphp [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [0.5.10-2ubuntu1]
[19:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dlm [arm64] (artful-proposed) [4.0.7-1ubuntu2]
[19:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dlm [s390x] (artful-proposed) [4.0.7-1ubuntu2]
[19:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sassphp [i386] (artful-proposed) [0.5.10-2ubuntu1]
[19:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dlm [i386] (artful-proposed) [4.0.7-1ubuntu2]
[19:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sassphp [s390x] (artful-proposed) [0.5.10-2ubuntu1]
[19:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sassphp [arm64] (artful-proposed) [0.5.10-2ubuntu1]
[19:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openssh [source] (zesty-proposed) [1:7.4p1-10ubuntu0.1]
[20:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-7-cross-ports [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [0ubuntu3] (no packageset)
[20:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openssl [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1.0.2g-1ubuntu9.2]
[20:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected google-perftools [source] (yakkety-proposed) [2.4-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>]
[20:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-software [source] (yakkety-proposed) [3.20.1+git20170427.0.3d09239-0ubuntu1]
[20:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-software [source] (xenial-proposed) [3.20.1+git20170427.0.3d09239-0ubuntu1~xenial1]
[20:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nova [source] (xenial-proposed) [2:13.1.3-0ubuntu2]
[20:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron [source] (xenial-proposed) [2:8.4.0-0ubuntu2]
[20:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted php7.0 [source] (yakkety-proposed) [7.0.18-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>]
[21:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted muon [source] (yakkety-proposed) [4:5.6.0-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>]
[21:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted muon [source] (xenial-proposed) [4:5.6.0-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>]
[21:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted vlc [source] (yakkety-proposed) [2.2.4-4ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>]
[21:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nova-lxd [source] (yakkety-proposed) [14.2.2-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>]
[21:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sane-backends [source] (yakkety-proposed) [1.0.25+git20150528-1ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>]
[21:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sane-backends [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.0.25+git20150528-1ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>]
[21:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron [source] (yakkety-proposed) [2:9.2.0-0ubuntu2]
[21:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pcs [source] (xenial-proposed) [0.9.149-1ubuntu1.1]
[21:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gcc-7-cross [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [3ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[21:55] <krytarik> infinity: Hi. Just to make sure, are you expecting me to file MPs on the one-line changes to CD Images and livecd-rootfs for Studio we've been talking about last week?
[21:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted autopkgtest [source] (xenial-proposed) [3.20.4ubuntu1]
[21:59] <infinity> krytarik: Not necessarily, but you could poke me next week when I'm back from vacation
[22:00] <infinity> krytarik: Running out now to be not at a computer, I'll catch you later.
[22:00] <krytarik> Great, will do.  Have fun till then! :)
[22:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-firmware [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.157.10]
[22:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kopanocore [s390x] (artful-proposed/universe) [8.1.0-3ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[22:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kopanocore [ppc64el] (artful-proposed/universe) [8.1.0-3ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[22:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron-lbaas [source] (xenial-proposed) [2:8.3.0-0ubuntu3]
[22:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kopanocore [amd64] (artful-proposed/universe) [8.1.0-3ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[22:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kopanocore [i386] (artful-proposed/universe) [8.1.0-3ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[22:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-software (zesty-proposed/main) [3.22.7-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS> => 3.22.7-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>] (ubuntu-desktop)
[22:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-7-cross [amd64] (artful-proposed) [3ubuntu2]
[22:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-7-cross [i386] (artful-proposed) [3ubuntu2]
[22:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kopanocore [i386] (artful-proposed) [8.1.0-3ubuntu1]
[22:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kopanocore [s390x] (artful-proposed) [8.1.0-3ubuntu1]
[22:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted gcc-7-cross [arm64] (artful-proposed) [3ubuntu2]
[22:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kopanocore [ppc64el] (artful-proposed) [8.1.0-3ubuntu1]
[22:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kopanocore [amd64] (artful-proposed) [8.1.0-3ubuntu1]


[03:45] <vorlon> hallyn: never heard of itstool before, but I am a msgfmt veteran
[03:46] <vorlon> hallyn: what specifically do you see not being translated?
[03:46] <vorlon> (and msgfmt is just the thing that converts text .po files into .mo message catalogs, that tool in particular isn't likely to be the source of trouble)
[05:39] <ibilalkayy> Hello world
[05:44] <ibilalkayy> Hey friends, my name is Bilal Khan. I am a Golang developer. I am just started out in the Ubuntu contribution and currently reading the contribution guide. How can I raise a PR in this guide https://packaging.ubuntu.com/html/introduction-to-ubuntu-development.html because I found one paragraph that needs to be updated so that it can be properly
[05:44] <ibilalkayy> understandable.
[05:53] <arraybolt3> ibilalkayy: Hmm, I can see that the code repo that the manual is based on is here: https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-packaging-guide-team/ubuntu-packaging-guide/trunk
[05:53] <arraybolt3> However, the VCS used there is Bazaar, not Git, and I don't actually know how to make a Launchpad merge request (MR) for Bazaar stuff.
[05:54] <arraybolt3> ibilalkayy: This might help: https://help.launchpad.net/Code/Review
[05:55] <ibilalkayy> Thank you, arraybolt3. I will check it and let you know.
[06:45] <seb128> ginggs, hey, could you give a retry to the fprintd package on the lunar archive rebuild? we believe it should be fixed with the recent libfprint fixes
[06:46] <ginggs> seb128: .
[06:52] <seb128> ginggs, thanks!
[08:03] <nkshirsa> ack thanks sil2100
[08:27] <sil2100> nkshirsa: I'll try to review those today o/
[15:35] <rbasak> vorlon: I'm not exactly sure how, but your uploads and consequent rebuilds of python-petname in Lunar seems to have resulted in the binary being shipped being renamed from /usr/bin/python3-petname to /usr/bin/petname, which then collides with the (now removed in Lunar) /usr/bin/petname from the petname binary package from Kinetic, without a Breaks/Replaces.
[15:36] <vorlon> lolwut
[15:36] <vorlon> ok I'll take a look
[15:41] <rbasak> Thanks. I'm still puzzled. Rebuilding ubuntu2 against Kinetic results in /usr/bin/python3-petname. Rebuilding ubuntu4 against Kinetic results in /usr/bin/petname.
[15:49] <vorlon> rbasak: 'use modern debhelper' I'm guessing did the trick :)
[23:39] <hallyn> hey vorlon - as an example, https://github.com/shadow-maint/shadow/blob/master/man/po/de.po#L10267 corresponds to https://github.com/shadow-maint/shadow/blob/master/man/chage.1.xml#L59 ,
[23:39] <hallyn> if you fetch https://github.com/shadow-maint/shadow/releases/download/4.13/shadow-4.13.tar.gz and look at man/de/man1/chage.1, some parts are translated, some including man/chage.1.xml#L59 are not
[23:50] <vorlon> hallyn: I'm eyeballing, but the .po file does appear to match the source.  The only thing I notice is the line numbers are off in the comment?  would be ick for the tool to care, but checking


[01:50] <Philippe_Mate> Good Morning
[02:03] <nick__> Hello
[02:03] <nick__> ?
[02:04] <nick__> Is it Ma Tay or May t
[02:04] <nick__> ?
[02:04] <nick__> How do you say Mate
[02:04] <nick__> ?
[02:04] <randall> anyway you want to nick__
[02:05] <nick__> Whats wimpies pronounciation
[02:05] <nick__> lol
[02:05] <nick__> Do you know
[02:05] <nick__> ?
[02:05] <randall> the dev's pronounciation is ma-tay
[02:05] <nick__> dang
[02:05] <nick__> I have been saying it wrong for awhile thanks you precious
[02:06] <nick__> Thats it
[02:06] <nick__> bye
[02:06] <nick__> thanks
[02:07] <nick__> :)
[03:17] <putko> hi, anyone here to help me with an ubuntu question?
[03:17] <putko> (I've never used this chat before)
[03:22] <mate|59144> Hello
[03:22] <Astro7467> !ask | pukto
[03:33] <putko> How can I turn off my keyboard backlight?  I can turn it off with one of the function keys, but it keeps coming back on (e.g., when the screen dims if I don't type or click for a while)
[03:34] <putko> I would like to turn it off permanently (and it would be nice to know how to reactive it also)
[03:35] <putko> reactivate*
[03:41] <tony_> anyone know why my Ubuntu mate constantly locks screen except for the mouse?
[03:43] <Astro7467> putko - see if this helps; https://ubuntu-mate.community/t/keyboard-light-keeps-turning-on-after-login-and-or-unlock/6914/12
[03:44] <Astro7467> tony_ r u using compiz? I see that with compiz and never use it.
[03:45] <putko> Thank you, Astro
[03:46] <tony_> right now I am not using ccsm
[03:49] <Astro7467> tony_: alternative thoughts are to ensure you are on the latest kernel for your release
[03:49] <Astro7467> if it happens in LibreOffice apps, Cld be auto save causing the issue
[06:51] <talos1723> later.
[07:43] <airportbum> anybody know where i can download a movie? I need to check out vlc
[07:53] <ubuntu> hi...
[14:07] <klemens> Hey i cant start steam, i click on it but nothing will happen
[14:09] <klemens> can someone help
[14:11] <sixwheeledbeast^> not used steam, is it showing in top have you tried a reboot?
[14:12] <klemens> yes
[14:12] <klemens> its showed in the task manager as sleep
[14:13] <sixwheeledbeast^> Did you install from the boutique?
[14:14] <klemens> yes
[14:15] <sixwheeledbeast^> I have just installed it, waiting while it does a large update
[14:16] <klemens> Will try to trinstall it.
[14:16] <klemens> *reinstall
[15:34] <bumblefuzz> So, I have a few problems: 1.) Turning my volume up and down doesn't actually change the sound level
[15:34] <bumblefuzz> 2.) I can't change my monitor brightness
[15:35] <bumblefuzz> actually, I think that's it
[19:28] <stephenbbb> how can I upgrade from mate 14.04 to 16.xx
[19:30] <linuxman> salut à tous
[19:32] <linuxman> il y à quelququ'un
[19:37] <alberto_> Hello everyone
[19:41] <alberto_> Hello everyone
[19:42] <alberto_> I'm having a problem with automatic remote folder mounting. I get two icons on my desktop of the same remote folder...
[21:34] <bray90820> Hey I'm here trying to install ubuntu makte to an 8Gb SD card which the website says is the minimum required but the image is 8.05
[21:35] <bray90820> *Ubuntu mate
[21:40] <Artemis3> the image is 8? what image?
[21:43] <bray90820> Artemis3: the ubuntu mate system image
[21:44] <HoppingMadMan> I really need to get a 16GB card so I can put mate on the pi2
[21:44] <Artemis3> the iso should be around 1.5
[21:45] <HoppingMadMan> You guys talking about images just reminded me of that... But good knows where I am going to get 16GB at the moment
[21:45] <Artemis3> or do a min install then add mate desktop afterwards
[21:45] <Artemis3> mini iso install i meant
[21:46] <bray90820> Artemis3: https://ubuntu-mate.org/raspberry-pi/
[21:46] <Artemis3> ah that
[21:48] <bray90820> Yeah
[21:48] <bray90820> Why is the decompressed image over 8GB if it says I can use an 8gb SD card
[21:52] <HoppingMadMan> Yeah that is the problem I ran into bray908220
[21:53] <bray90820> HoppingMadMan: What should I do about it?
[21:54] <HoppingMadMan> Get a 16 GB
[21:54] <bray90820> Is that what you did?
[21:54] <HoppingMadMan> Well planing to
[21:55] <bray90820> Alright
[21:55] <HoppingMadMan> We had a riot the other week and all big shopping center where raided
[21:56] <bray90820> I'm trying one more thing to see if there isn't some free space at the end of the image
[21:56] <bray90820> Which would make it a non error
[22:01] <HoppingMadMan> Yeah, I am not that skilled
[22:02] <HoppingMadMan> I thought of removing things like firefox and other packages I wouldn't use but I ended up breaking the image
[22:10] <bray90820> DD takes way to long
[22:31] <Astro7467> bray90820: just checked the img file I hv and it shows up at 7.5Gb
[22:33] <Astro7467> DD speed improves if you give it a block size for i/o ops. bs=4M is generally faster
[22:58] <bray90820> Astro7467: Why is mine over 8 GB then?
[22:58] <bray90820> Where did you get yours from
[23:01] <Astro7467> the ubuntu-mate.org link. looking at the file date, it is a few months old.
[23:02] <Astro7467> not at the machine to dd or download currently to verify
[23:06] <bray90820> What did you do to extract the xz file
[23:06] <bray90820> Or rather the omg from the xz
[23:06] <bray90820> *IMG
[23:19] <bray90820> Astro7467: I just extracted it again and it's 8.05GB
[23:19] <bray90820> How did you extract it?