[12:56] <bob> hmm, i just tried to update to dapper to sort evreything out... and it's got worse. :(
[12:57] <bob> and the ltsp clients still display 'breezy badger'.. hmm.
[01:00] <bob> any ideas on what i could be missing? someone said something about installing _heldback_, but it doesnt seem to be there...
[05:40] <mhz> jsgotangco: ping
[06:11] <jsgotangco> mhz, hi
[06:14] <mhz> jsgotangco: are we having today's meeting?
[06:14] <jsgotangco> i guess so, its already automatic right?
[06:14] <jsgotangco> its not an issue for me because the meeting times here is only 8pm on my side
[06:15] <mhz> jsgotangco: well, yeah, every week
[06:15] <mhz> but I heard JaneW was sick yesterday
[06:16] <mhz> at least that's what ogra told me
[06:16] <jsgotangco> we'll just see
[06:16] <mhz> for me it is important because that means I have to set the alamr clock :D
[07:53] <JaneW> hi all
[07:53] <JaneW> we will have the meeting today
[07:53] <JaneW> at 12:00 UTC as usual
[08:48] <TOZTWO> =)
[08:51] <jsgotangco> ok i'll try to think of an excuse
[10:31] <alejandro> ogra, have you tested LTSP in environments with a Solaris dhcp server?
[10:32] <ogra> alejandro, nope
[10:32] <ogra> i dont have any solaris machines around to test it ...
[10:32] <ogra> whats wrong ?
[10:33] <alejandro>  it loads the kernel image but it doesnt mount the NFS partition (saying not root path specified, and the root path is configured as /opt/ltsp/i386 in the solaris dhcp server)
[10:53] <ogra> alejandro, which version of dhcpd does solaris use ?
[10:54] <ogra> and is this dapper or breezy ?
[11:09] <alejandro> ogra, they use their own dhcp server
[11:09] <alejandro> ogra, and I'm testing with breezy
[11:10] <alejandro> it's not a problem in the distribution because working with a dhcp server in linux, works fine.
[11:10] <ogra> i cant help you much if i dont know to which version their dhcpd is compatible ...
[11:11] <ogra> do you get an ip for rootserver in the bootprocess ?
[11:11] <ogra> or is this field zeroed out ?
[11:12] <alejandro> no, it doesnt get an ip
[11:12] <alejandro> when it asks dhcp again and mount NFS with the rootpath
[11:13] <alejandro> just says, no root-path
[11:13] <alejandro> in Solaris dhcp server you have to use SrootPTH, so I dont understand why its not working
[11:14] <ogra> above that message there is a list of data ... one says "rootserver: "
[11:14] <ogra> its either <IP_ADDRESS> or a correct ip
[11:15] <alejandro> yes, rootserver: server address, but it doesnt take the root path from dhcp server, so i dont see such message using the solaris dhcp server
[11:16] <alejandro> with Ubuntu works fine
[11:18] <ogra> ok, probably the root-path directive is named differently in solaris ...
[11:18] <ogra> another option would be to set it like: ip-address:/path/...
[11:19] <mhz> ogra: morning
[11:19] <ogra> hi
[11:19] <mhz> ogra: are we having meeting today?
[11:19] <ogra> i guess so ...
[11:19] <mhz> cool
[11:19] <ogra> JaneW, ?? ^^^^
[11:20] <JaneW> yes we are
[11:20] <mhz> JaneW: !! feeling better???
[11:20] <JaneW> **Reminder** Edubuntu Dev Update meeting in #ubuntu-meeting in +- 1h40mins
[11:20] <JaneW> mhz: yes getting there thanks
[11:20] <mhz> NOTICE: Nor ogra NOR JaneW can get sick
[11:20] <mhz> :D
[11:21] <JaneW> mhz: you got a response from mark yet?
[11:21] <mhz> none
[11:21] <JaneW> hmmm
[11:21] <mhz> I dont even know if he reads my emails
[11:21] <JaneW> he is still travelling
[11:22] <mhz> It's a real torture every time I read "From" column.. Mark Shuttleworth, "Subject" ...(oh not for me)
[11:22] <mhz> :D
[11:24] <JaneW> the thing is though the number of 'please come to our event - we'll pay your expenses' he gets are quite high...
[11:24] <jsgotangco> see you guys later
[11:25] <JaneW> but the amount of 'please come to and/or pay for xyz' it truly astounding...
[11:25] <jsgotangco> wow
[11:25] <jsgotangco> pay for xyz
[11:25] <jsgotangco> dear mark
[11:25] <jsgotangco> please pay for the completion of edubuntu cookbook
[11:25] <jsgotangco> lol
[11:25] <jsgotangco> joke
[11:25] <JaneW> LOL
[11:25] <jsgotangco> i gotta go get dinner
[11:25] <JaneW> good one
[11:25] <jsgotangco> see you later
[11:26] <JaneW> k, enjoy
[11:28] <mhz> JaneW: yeah, I understand, I hope he sees how serious we are on this project and that we dont want to keep his money in our pockets.
[11:28] <jsgotangco> JaneW, seriously though, i think i can pull off a 5 page quickguide for edubuntu before april
[11:28] <jsgotangco> if the cookbook doesn't happen
[11:28] <ogra> that'd be really cool ...
[11:29] <jsgotangco> just a small guide to make it work
[11:29] <mhz> jsgotangco: and I can help you
[11:29] <JaneW> jsgotangco: \0/
[11:29] <JaneW> mhz: |o|
[11:29] <jsgotangco> mhz, let's create a simple TOC in the wiki later
[11:29] <mhz> ;)
[11:29] <JaneW> ogra: \o|
[11:30] <mhz> jsgotangco: but wouln't be stepping on others work
[11:30] <mhz> +we
[11:31] <ogra> heh, seems we have windows support in ltsp now http://www.suares.an/Kubuntu_LTSP_Win4Lin
[11:31] <mhz> .oO(edubuntu quickie?)
[11:33] <jsgotangco> mhz, sure but i want something in the distro after dapper 4
[11:33] <jsgotangco> i mean flight 4
[11:33] <jsgotangco> we just finished the makefile for the edubuntu doc in svn
[11:33] <mhz> jsgotangco: ok, I see your point
[11:33] <jsgotangco> doc.ubuntu.com will have edubuntu previews in a few hours
[11:34] <jsgotangco> which will then be transferred to help.ubuntu.com
[11:34] <mhz> jsgotangco: ok, go have dinner and ping me once you get back so we can chat a few minutes b4 meeting, please
[11:34] <jsgotangco> ok
[11:34] <jsgotangco> cheers
[11:34] <jsgotangco> later
[11:34] <mhz> c u
[11:38] <mhz> ogra: and what Win4Lin is for? I mean I read the whole procedure but did not get how it is useful.
[11:38] <ogra> its like vmware ... you can install windows in an emulator
[11:38] <mhz> ooooooh
[11:41] <mhz> JaneW: oh, just in case it is useful info, we'll pay for hotel ;)
[12:00] <mhz> ogra: just sharing this anecdote of my current fetish, a bot called 'diabetik' insulting me upon my own request: "You are nothing but a dizzy-eyed pile of left-over vomit"
[12:01] <ogra> shudder
[12:01] <mhz> I admit I have fallen in love with such bot and I just hope it is a 'she'
[12:01] <mhz> I need at least one insult from her a day
[12:01] <mhz> to make my day
[12:02] <mhz> :D
[12:02] <pips1> hi
[12:03] <pips1> mhz, r u a masochist, or what ;-)
[12:03] <signifer123> hey pips
[12:03] <pips1> hi signifer123
[12:05] <mhz> yup, I have found -to my total surprise- I may have developed a kind of geek-masochism I never knew I had. Having a bot insulting me when I ask for it, it is very cool
[12:05] <mhz> pips1, it is a whole new dimention of geeknes
[12:06] <pips1> I can see there is a lot of progress in the EDubuntu world .. I'm now running edubuntu dapper on my test machine .. and I can see all those package updates rattling through :-)
[12:06] <mhz> but hey! it sounds logical after so many hours at the computer, giving love to your OS settings and so.
[12:07] <pips1> mhz, I thought you had a tour of some sorts, so you must be getting out, rather than just sitting in front of your pc, no?
[12:08] <pips1> plus, it's summer in Chile!
[12:09] <mhz> pips1: yes, but it is scheduled for april and preparations ahve just started this week. The rest was meetings only, so this fetish was the result of many hours ago :)
[12:09] <pips1> right, :-)
[12:09] <mhz> pips1: well, with an avarage of 30 C every day, we get nuts
[12:09] <pips1> phew!
[12:10] <mhz> and my home office is just 120m p/ side only :(
[12:10] <pips1> I prefer cold weather when I need to be productive
[12:10] <mhz> pips1: i
[12:10] <mhz> Meant 1.20 m
[12:11] <mhz> pips1: me too!
[12:11] <pips1> your office is 1 meter 20 cm away ?! huh?
[12:11] <mhz> but I can't afford to live following the winter or autumn (my favorite season)
[12:12] <mhz> pips1: nope, 1 m 20 cm each wall (a square this small)
[12:12] <pips1> oh
[12:12] <pips1> office box
[12:12] <pips1> !
[12:12] <mhz> and I have to put table, chair, books, aetc
[12:13] <mhz> and leave room for a door opening
[12:13] <mhz> it is really madness
[12:14] <mhz> anyways, yes, edubuntu is getting real cool
[12:14] <pips1> mhz = geek in a cupboard ;-)
[12:14] <mhz> pips1: sado-geek in a cupboard!
[12:14] <mhz> :D
[12:14] <pips1> haha
[12:15] <pips1> what were you saying about live following winter ...?
[12:16] <pips1> do you mean you'll switch northern and southern hemispheres, in order to stay in winter all year? shudder!
[12:16] <mhz> oh, and I forgot the torturing noise. The homeserver box has a constant annoying sound made by the power fan, a tk-tik-tak-tk
[12:18] <pips1> yes, those power fans can be nerve wrecking... when I got my hardware, I got some "silent running" fans, but at the moment my test machine sits on my table and it's rather noisy still
[12:18] <pips1> :-/
[12:18] <mhz> yup, you know what i mean
[12:19] <pips1> there is a meeting scheduled in 40 mins, right?
[12:19] <mhz> pips1: if if were for me, I'd live in a place where I get no higher than 20 C every day
[12:19] <mhz> -f +t
[12:19] <mhz> yup, meeting
[12:21] <pips1> here in Switzerland, it's been very cold, so cold that several of our (smaller) lakes froze solid... I would have liked to go scating and walking on them, but it seems I missed the chance... they are "closing" the lakes already again since the ice isn't thick enough anymore
[12:22] <mhz> JaneW: oooh, I forgot to give the good news. I got a Lab to test edubuntu env. (5 modern and 3 old pc's + a nice desktopserver) and invite teachers to know edubuntu in action, with cookies and coffee :D
[12:22] <pips1> well, froze over, of course, not solid
[12:22] <JaneW> yay
[12:22] <mhz> ohh
[12:23] <pips1> mhz, very nice
[12:23] <mhz> + they will print another article about edubuntu for april's issue (delivered for free to many schools)
[12:24] <mhz> so I am still making some notes to make that article
[12:25] <pips1> what's that magazine? a Chilean one?
[12:27] <mhz> yup, Colegio Interactivo. I wikied the article
[12:27] <pips1> ah
[12:43] <JaneW> **Reminder** Edubuntu Dev Update meeting in #ubuntu-meeting in +- 15 mins <- time to get coffee etc
[12:44] <JaneW> also I have added https://wiki.edubuntu.org/EdubuntuFlight4Announcement for those that would like to add something before the announcement goes out when flight 4 is ready
[12:44] <JaneW> if anyone is up to it an Edubuntu equiv of https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DapperFlight4 would be fabulous.
[12:45] <mhz> oops, 31 tabs open :)
[01:01] <jsgotangco> are we guys having a meeting or i completely missed something in less than an hour that i was away?
[01:02] <pips1> jsgotangco, the meeting is starting now, me thinks
[01:03] <JaneW> mhz_back10min -> meeting time, when you get back
[01:03] <JaneW> MEETING TIME #ubuntu-meeting
[02:15] <JaneW> flint: quack
[02:15] <pips1> that was a duck of a fun
[02:15] <JaneW> oh he is not even here
[02:16] <mhz> flint: poor duck
[02:17] <flint> mhz, sometimes you just have to put your best duck forward and hope for the best...sigh...
[02:17] <flint> gonna go get a cupa coffee.
[02:28] <pips1> mhz, you said that both highvoltage and hno73 did lots of work for the edubuntu site already?
[02:30] <mhz> pips1: yes. Highvoltage was preparing a drupal demo (I never saw it so no idea what it was like, and I was willing to test it) and hno73 has been working very hard on a Moin new version for the site. AFAIK, he's even working on a theme for Accessibility issues (I wanted to do it when he told me, he was almost there)
[02:34] <pips1> oh
[02:34] <pips1> mhz_cookin, good cooking, I'll talk to you later
[03:23] <spacey> ogra: there is a new feature in firefox
[03:23] <ogra> is there ?
[03:23] <spacey> which might nog be so convienant for terminal servers
[03:23] <spacey> http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/ben/archives/009749.html
[03:24] <spacey> i hope we can disable that feature by default
[03:24] <spacey> its in ffox 1.5
[03:25] <ogra> talk to iwj/Diziet in #ubuntu-devel
[03:26] <spacey> ok
[03:29] <spacey> ogra: know his email?
[03:29] <spacey> since i have to leave on shortterm
[03:29] <ogra> file a bug ?
[03:29] <spacey> hmm ok
[03:29] <spacey> better idea
[03:29] <ogra> that will get his attention in any case
[03:29] <spacey> package firefox
[03:29] <spacey> mozilla-firefox
[03:29] <spacey> hmm

[03:32] <spacey> bug filing is fine
[03:38] <spacey> https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/31514
[03:38] <spacey> you might want to subscribe
[03:38] <spacey> in case
[03:39] <spacey> ogra: iwj = ian jackson?
[03:39] <ogra> yup
[03:43] <spacey> ah
[04:14] <mhz_cookin> re
[04:14] <mhz_cookin> jsgotangco: ping
[04:14] <jsgotangco> hi
[04:15] <mhz_cookin> still cooking :(
[04:15] <jsgotangco> lol
[04:15] <jsgotangco> i'll do a draft wiki page for now
[04:15] <mhz_cookin> jsgotangco: is 24 UTC ok?
[04:15] <jsgotangco> sure
[04:15] <jsgotangco> that'll be around 8am
[04:15] <mhz_cookin> (that will give you time to sleep)
[04:15] <jsgotangco> no sweat
[04:16] <mhz_cookin> ooh
[04:16] <jsgotangco> i'll just finish the wiki page
[04:16] <jsgotangco> i'm still finishing something for GAI at the moment
[04:16] <mhz_cookin> jsgotangco: what about 02 UTC of q6th ?
[04:16] <mhz_cookin> jsgotangco: what about 02 UTC of 16th ?
[04:16] <jsgotangco> i'll be around
[04:17] <mhz_cookin> in other words... what is best UTC for you?
[04:17] <jsgotangco> the worse for me really is 17 to 22
[04:17] <mhz_cookin> and your ideal?
[04:17] <jsgotangco> as long as you see me online, i'ts ideal
[04:18] <mhz_cookin> jsgotangco: hehehe, okis
[04:18] <mhz_cookin> so see you in lot more hours
[04:19] <jsgotangco> heh
[04:22] <jsgotangco> mhz_cookin, i'll do it here https://wiki.ubuntu.com/EdubuntuDocumentation/EdubuntuQuickguide
[04:23] <mhz_cookin> EdubuntuQuickie ?
[04:23] <mhz_cookin> lol
[04:24] <mhz_cookin> "I need a Lab, i need a lab!" / "ok, get the EdubuntuQuickie"
[04:24] <jsgotangco> EdubuntuQuickguide dummy
[04:24] <jsgotangco> :D
[04:24] <mhz_cookin> ok, I'll subscribe to it
[04:27] <jsgotangco> mhz_cookin, i'm just thinking of desktip guide for now
[04:28] <jsgotangco> mhz_cookin, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/EdubuntuDocumentation/EdubuntuQuickguide
[04:28] <mhz_cookin> sure, end-users?
[04:28] <mhz_cookin> end-users = students   or    teachers ?
[04:29] <mhz_cookin> jsgotangco: ?
[04:29] <jsgotangco> i was thinking more of who uses the workstation version or a terminal client
[04:30] <jsgotangco> not so much on who actually uses it
[04:30] <jsgotangco> generic as possible
[04:30] <jsgotangco> we don't have that much time
[04:30] <mhz_cookin> okis, agreed
[04:31] <mhz_cookin> now, I will get back to cooking
[04:31] <jsgotangco> cheers
[04:31] <mhz_cookin> or else you wont have mhz to work with :D
[09:40] <gs_scott> Afternoon
[10:17] <signifer123> hey
[10:21] <paolob> Hi guys!
[10:21] <signifer123> hey
[10:22] <paolob> I have the ltsp server which is connected to the internet. I want that the clients can't access the internet. What should I do?
[10:27] <Burgwork> paolob, use squid to not let them on
[10:27] <paolob> Burgwork, does squid exist in edubuntu?
[10:27] <Burgwork> paolob, it exists in teh ubuntu repos
[10:28] <paolob> Burgwork, and is it ready for everyday use?
[10:28] <Burgwork> paolob, squid? yes
[10:29] <paolob> Burgwork, ok,
[10:29] <Burgwork> http://www.squid-cache.org/
[10:53] <signifer123> hello
[10:53] <signifer123> is there a patch for jsut losing control of your mouse/keyboard and having to reboot?
[10:54] <signifer123> or is it jsut my mouse
[11:14] <paolob> Guys, did anyone be able to have internet access on the ltsp server and not on the clients?


[01:25] <xubuntu00i> hekp
[08:21] <sorinello_> Hello. I am looking at http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2016/09/download-ubuntu-16-10-beta-2-flavors but I don't see anything related to Xubuntu
[09:34] <knome> sorinello_, yes, that's because xubuntu didn't release beta 2
[09:49] <sorinello_> thanks knome
[10:26] <jeno> how would i get a shell script to start on boot-up?
[11:15] <xubuntu00o> hi is there a possibility to upgrade xubuntu 10.4 to 16.04 or do I have to install everything new
[11:15] <knome> nope.
[11:16] <xubuntu00o> okay thanks, have a good day
[18:13] <pavlushka> any help with "samba --configure" workaround? coz bu default it fails in 2:4.3.11?
[18:15] <pavlushka> *by default
[18:47] <Gaming4LifeDE> hi. so i need to load a driver for nvidia ethernet adapter. how can i do that and which driver to use?
[19:03] <Gaming4LifeDE> help? :o anyone?
[20:37] <Fendo1> buona sera, sapete se è possibile installare hplip 3.16.9 su xubuntu?
[20:37] <Fendo1> Grazie mille
[20:38] <Unit193> Fendo1: Hello, this is an English speaking channel, but if you need help in another language...
[20:38] <Unit193> !it
[20:38] <Fendo1> Sorry
[20:40] <Fendo1> Good evening can I install hplip 3.16.9 on Xubuntu? Thank
[20:40] <Unit193> Not even the next release is slated to have .9 in it.
[20:42] <Fendo1> Thank you
[20:44] <Unit193> Debian has it, so that's some decent news then.


[03:38] <sille777> good evening all
[03:40] <mrand> Howdy
[03:40] <mrand> Ahmuck: google seems to imply yes
[03:41] <sille777> anyone else get the desktopcouch crash messages?
[03:44] <stlsaint> sille777: sup
[03:44] <stlsaint> nope
[03:45] <sille777> not much
[03:45] <mrand> This video is funny: http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/12/video-barbie-in-fbi-crosshairs
[03:46] <sille777> just wodering why desktopcouch crashes .... Dont even know what it is or does...I think its part of evolution but i dont even use it
[03:49] <mrand> http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Specifications/desktopcouch
[03:56] <sille777> hmmmm....
[03:57] <sille777> since i really dont use ubuntu one or evolution on this computer maybe if i remove them from the startup applications...
[03:57] <sille777> this will make the issue go away
[04:00] <sille777> bbl
[04:07] <sille777> desktopcouch-service still crashes right after startup and i load a browser window
[14:43] <stlsaint> ping


[09:02] <jeffrey> hi, i used a live usb of lubuntu into a windows system that crashed because its all i have,, live wont permently install for lack of boot operation,, what can i do ??? repair boot using command line,,,,, i just am a seriously dumb broke joker !! ,,, thanks y'all
[14:41] <faLUKE> hello. I can't download lubuntu from the official website. is there any problem?
[14:41] <Oxfuxxx> lubuntu.me ?
[14:41] <faLUKE> the link seems broken
[14:41] <faLUKE> Oxfuxxx: https://lubuntu.net/downloads/
 That is not the official web page
 http://lubuntu.me
[14:42] <faLUKE> that's weird. what site is it?
 https://lubuntu.me/downloads is the page you want
 Is not a official site (re @lubuntu_bot: (irc) <faLUKE> that's weird. what site is it?)
[14:43] <faLUKE> thanks. I understand it's not an official site, but what is it?
 https://lubuntu.me/downloads
[14:43] <Oxfuxxx> Other sites are campers with more or less fake stuff fir a reason or another.
[14:44] <faLUKE> Oxfuxxx: campers? what do you mean?
[14:44] <Oxfuxxx> faLUKE: they use the name to bug ppl out.
[14:44] <Oxfuxxx> Maybe they don't like lubuntu.
 Lubuntu.net is maintained with ♡ by Free and Open Source contributors from Asia, Linux Fans and the lubuntu Meilix community.
 This is their web
[14:45] <faLUKE> Oxfuxxx: a distro war ?
[14:45] <Oxfuxxx> maybe.
[14:45] <Oxfuxxx> just stick to .me
[14:46] <Oxfuxxx> its in the topic btw.
[14:46] <faLUKE> ok thanks
 DO NOT use lubuntu.net - it's not a 'distro war' but it's just not the official site.
 lubuntu.me is the official site
 (reiteration)


[07:32] <ara> morning all :)
[09:57] <davmor2> Yay main bulk of installer testcase are in place now :)
[09:59] <ara> davmor2: \o/ congrats!
[13:01]  * ara -> lunch
[13:11]  * davmor2 lunch
[14:42]  * davmor2 brb
[21:34] <nagappan> cr3, ping
[21:34] <cr3> nagappan: pong
[21:34] <nagappan> cr3, I think you maybe the right person to answer that question :) in desktop-testing-list
[21:36] <cr3> nagappan: all I'm seeing are congratulations on the list :)
[21:36] <nagappan> cr3, :)
[21:36] <nagappan> cr3, no just a new email
[21:37] <nagappan> cr3, [gnome-desktop-testing] LDTP and dogtail
[21:39] <cr3> nagappan: ara would be the best person but I could provide a short answer in a moment
[21:39] <nagappan> cr3, sure, thanks :)


[12:04] <jibel> phillw, ask him to start a live session, open a terminal, start ubiquity with ubiquity -d and reproduce the crash
[12:04] <jibel> phillw, then either file a bug from the live session with ubuntu-bug ubiquity
[12:04] <phillw> jibel: thanks, I'll email them the instructions :)
[12:05] <jibel> or copy the files /var/log/installer/* /var/log/syslog /var/log/partman to another machine and report a bug with https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+filebug
[13:35] <phillw> hi jibel http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/reports/bugs/1007394
[14:48] <PaoloRotolo> Hi all!


[00:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apport (focal-proposed/main) [2.20.11-0ubuntu27.12 => 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.13] (core, i386-whitelist)
[00:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apport (groovy-proposed/main) [2.20.11-0ubuntu50.1 => 2.20.11-0ubuntu50.2] (core, i386-whitelist)
[02:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (bionic-proposed/main) [1:18.04.40 => 1:18.04.41] (core)
[05:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pgaudit [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.5.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pgaudit [s390x] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.5.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pgaudit [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.5.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-prometheus-procfs [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.2.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pgaudit [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.5.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-mvdan-xurls [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [2.2.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-alexflint-go-arg [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.3.0+ds-1] (no packageset)
[05:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pgaudit [armhf] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.5.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-thedevsaddam-gojsonq [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [2.5.2-1] (no packageset)
[05:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-mvdan-gofumpt [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.0~git20201107.a024667-1] (no packageset)
[05:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd (hirsute-proposed/main) [1.5.1-4 => 1.5.1-4] (core)
[05:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pgaudit [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [1.5.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd (hirsute-proposed/main) [1.5.1-4 => 1.5.1-4] (core)
[05:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd (hirsute-proposed/main) [1.5.1-4 => 1.5.1-4] (core)
[08:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-alexflint-go-arg [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.3.0+ds-1]
[08:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-thedevsaddam-gojsonq [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [2.5.2-1]
[08:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-mvdan-xurls [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [2.2.0-1]
[08:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pgaudit [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.5.0-1]
[08:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pgaudit [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed) [1.5.0-1]
[08:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pgaudit [s390x] (hirsute-proposed) [1.5.0-1]
[08:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-prometheus-procfs [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.2.0-1]
[08:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pgaudit [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.5.0-1]
[08:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pgaudit [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.5.0-1]
[08:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-mvdan-gofumpt [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [0.0~git20201107.a024667-1]
[08:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pgaudit [armhf] (hirsute-proposed) [1.5.0-1]
[08:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ggd-utils [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.0.7+ds-1] (no packageset)
[08:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ggd-utils [s390x] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.0.7+ds-1] (no packageset)
[08:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ggd-utils [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.0.7+ds-1] (no packageset)
[08:21] <icey> Hey - any chance the nova that's been in the unnapproved queue for Focal for a few days could get accepted into propsed?
[08:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ggd-utils [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.0.7+ds-1] (no packageset)
[08:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ggd-utils [armhf] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.0.7+ds-1] (no packageset)
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-55.61]
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-55.61]
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [5.8.0-30.32]
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (groovy-proposed) [5.8.0-30.32]
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [arm64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-55.61]
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [5.8.0-30.32]
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [s390x] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-55.61]
[08:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [s390x] (groovy-proposed) [5.8.0-30.32]
[08:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-125.128]
[08:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-125.128]
[08:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ggd-utils [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.0.7+ds-1] (no packageset)
[09:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: u-boot (groovy-proposed/main) [2020.04+dfsg-2ubuntu1 => 2020.10+dfsg-1ubuntu0~20.10] (core)
[09:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: u-boot (focal-proposed/main) [2019.07+dfsg-1ubuntu6 => 2020.10+dfsg-1ubuntu0~20.04] (core)
[09:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [amd64] (focal-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu26.7]
[09:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [arm64] (focal-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu26.7]
[09:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu35.1]
[09:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [arm64] (groovy-proposed) [2.04-1ubuntu35.1]
[09:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: u-boot (bionic-proposed/main) [2019.07+dfsg-1ubuntu4~18.04.1 => 2020.10+dfsg-1ubuntu0~18.04] (core)
[09:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ktuberling [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [4:20.08.3-2] (kubuntu)
[09:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted u-boot [source] (groovy-proposed) [2020.10+dfsg-1ubuntu0~20.10]
[10:09] <sil2100> waveform: hey! I'm reviewing the focal u-boot backport right now, just a quick confirmation question: I see the rpi-config-migration script has been dropped with this release - is that safe?
[10:10] <waveform> sil2100, argh, knew I'd missed something - that's meant to be in bionic and focal, but not groovy
[10:10] <sil2100> waveform: like, isn't it needed for any upgrade scenarios? Or hm, do we already not use u-boot for focal? Can't remember
[10:11] <waveform> sil2100, sorry - I'll get that fixed up after this call
[10:11] <sil2100> Yeah, it wasn't there for groovy which is fine, but in the focal one I see it being removed
[10:11] <sil2100> Thanks! Poke mvo and he'll happily re-sponsor :)
[10:12] <waveform> will do
[10:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected u-boot [source] (bionic-proposed) [2020.10+dfsg-1ubuntu0~18.04]
[10:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected u-boot [source] (focal-proposed) [2020.10+dfsg-1ubuntu0~20.04]
[10:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.02-2ubuntu8.20]
[10:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected grub2-signed [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.66.29]
[10:23] <doko> LocutusOfBorg: is mwhudson's patch at https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=973623#20 good enough to build with the BFD linker?
[10:24] <LocutusOfBorg> doko, no.
[10:25] <doko> do you have a more complete one?
[10:29] <Laney> doko: did you see mwhudson came up with a patch to gold (link posted on devel@)?
[10:30] <doko> Laney: yes, but gold isn't much maintained upstream, so the preferred option is to use the BFD linker
[10:31] <Laney> sure
[10:31] <doko> LocutusOfBorg: do you have a more complete one?
[10:31] <LocutusOfBorg> https://bileto.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/4325
[10:31] <LocutusOfBorg> the problem is that now even that one doesn't build anymore
[10:31] <LocutusOfBorg> same in debian
[10:31] <LocutusOfBorg> some other binutils changes broke it again
[10:31] <Laney> just saying, this might be an easier way to unblock ghc and then you work on de-golding it separately
[10:31] <Laney> but if it's ftbfs anyway, ...
[10:31] <Laney> face <- palm
[10:32] <LocutusOfBorg> :/
[10:32] <LocutusOfBorg> let me try to no change reupload
[10:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (bionic-proposed/main) [2.02-2ubuntu8.20 => 2.02-2ubuntu8.20] (core)
[10:32] <LocutusOfBorg> Laney, btw with parallel=2 armhf looks sooooooo faster (by some days=
[10:33] <Laney> huh
[10:33] <Laney> explain THAT
[10:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-signed [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.93.22]
[10:34] <LocutusOfBorg> https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/4325/+build/20271746
[10:34] <LocutusOfBorg> Finished on 2020-11-14 (took 4 days, 13 hours, 25 minutes, 57.3 seconds)
[10:35] <LocutusOfBorg> the one in archive Finished on 2020-09-10 (took 6 days, 3 hours, 59 minutes, 59.5 seconds)
[10:35] <Laney> is that one data point or repeated over a few?
[10:36] <LocutusOfBorg> Laney, the previous build, the Ubuntu 5 without that hack, failed after 6 days https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa-service/+archive/ubuntu/4325/+build/20267580
[10:36] <LocutusOfBorg> mostly 7 days
[10:36] <Laney> so one good, but many bad, interesting to see if it is really good after the next build then
[10:37] <LocutusOfBorg> no sorry Laney it didn't fail
[10:37] <LocutusOfBorg> it just failed to publish because in parallel I uploaded the ubuntu6 on same bileto
[10:41] <LocutusOfBorg> that is the only difference between ubuntu5 and ubuntu6, the first has parallel=4 the second has max-parallel=2 on armhf
[10:43] <LocutusOfBorg> the problem is: I switched away from gold on ppc64el, fixed a build failure, about bootstrapping with a bfd ghc archive version, and the build was good
[10:43] <LocutusOfBorg> then, the very same build, started to fail again for no reason
[10:45] <LocutusOfBorg> doko, what about adding this patch to binutils? https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=f1e05b19786669d29d59f48f26bc06ad67c221e2
[10:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2 [source] (xenial-proposed) [2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.29]
[10:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted grub2-signed [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.66.29]
[10:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (bionic-proposed/main) [2.02-2ubuntu8.20 => 2.02-2ubuntu8.20] (core)
[10:51] <ginggs> mwhudson doko: do we still need to build numpy without -srd=c99? as in https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/numpy/1:1.18.4-1ubuntu1
[10:54] <doko> ginggs: I don't know. I would be better to investigate about the rounding errors?
[10:55] <doko> I'll ask Mathieu today
[11:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (xenial-proposed/main) [2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.28 => 2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.29] (core)
[11:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gke-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1074.79] (no packageset)
[11:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-55.61~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[11:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1103.114] (kernel)
[11:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-55.61~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[11:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [s390x] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-55.61~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[11:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-dell300x [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.15.0-1007.11] (no packageset)
[11:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-55.61~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[11:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gkeop-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1005.6] (no packageset)
[11:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1059.65] (kernel)
[11:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1032.33] (core, kernel)
[11:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-5.8 [s390x] (focal-proposed/main) [5.8.0-30.32~20.04.1] (no packageset)
[11:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1030.32] (core, kernel)
[11:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-5.8 [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/main) [5.8.0-30.32~20.04.1] (no packageset)
[11:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-kvm [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1027.28] (no packageset)
[11:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-5.8 [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.8.0-30.32~20.04.1] (no packageset)
[11:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-5.8 [arm64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.8.0-30.32~20.04.1] (no packageset)
[11:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1032.33]
[11:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-5.8 [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.8.0-30.32~20.04.1]
[11:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-5.8 [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [5.8.0-30.32~20.04.1]
[11:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-kvm [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1027.28]
[11:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1030.32]
[11:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-5.8 [s390x] (focal-proposed) [5.8.0-30.32~20.04.1]
[11:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-5.8 [arm64] (focal-proposed) [5.8.0-30.32~20.04.1]
[11:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-dell300x [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1007.11]
[11:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gkeop-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.4.0-1005.6]
[11:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [5.4.0-55.61~18.04.1]
[11:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [5.4.0-55.61~18.04.1]
[11:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1059.65]
[11:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gke-4.15 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1074.79]
[11:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [5.4.0-55.61~18.04.1]
[11:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.4.0-55.61~18.04.1]
[11:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1103.114]
[11:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2 (xenial-proposed/main) [2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.29 => 2.02~beta2-36ubuntu3.29] (core)
[12:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem-5.6 [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.6.0-1035.37] (no packageset)
[12:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (groovy-proposed/main) [5.8.0-1013.14] (core, kernel)
[12:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (groovy-proposed/main) [5.8.0-1012.12] (core, kernel)
[12:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1030.32] (core, kernel)
[12:12] <AsciiWolf> ahayzen, hi, anything new about the Steam package update in Ubuntu? :-)
[13:07] <xnox> ginggs:  yes. upstream fixed it, but then broke it, and fixed it again. i'm not sure if it is fixed in latest release of numpy or not.
[13:07] <xnox> ginggs:  it is meant to detect things correctly and not emit std=c99 anymore.
[13:08] <xnox> ginggs:  latest debian build still has std=c99 everywhere.....
[13:14] <ginggs> xnox: thanks
[13:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem-5.6 [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.6.0-1035.37]
[13:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [5.8.0-1013.14]
[13:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1030.32]
[13:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [5.8.0-1012.12]
[13:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-125.128~16.04.1] (kernel)
[13:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-kvm [amd64] (groovy-proposed/main) [5.8.0-1010.11] (core)
[13:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (groovy-proposed/main) [5.8.0-1011.11] (core, kernel)
[13:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-125.128~16.04.1] (kernel)
[14:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-kvm [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [5.8.0-1010.11]
[14:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (groovy-proposed) [5.8.0-1011.11]
[14:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-125.128~16.04.1]
[14:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-125.128~16.04.1]
[14:14] <rbalint> is ubuntu-release a valid call sign, like ubuntu-archive?
[14:15] <apw> rbalint, not sure it is, it likely _should_ be, then again u-a didn't work for me either, wtf
[14:16] <seb128> I'm probably going to end up unconfiguring ubuntu-archive, it's mostly noise from urls copied, we should pick one that isn't conflicting with existing resources
[14:19] <rbalint> seb128, maybe a regex filter [^~]ubuntu-release would be better
[14:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.5.1-1]
[14:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.5.1-3]
[14:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.5.1-4]
[14:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [armhf] (hirsute-proposed) [1.5.1-4]
[14:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [amd64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.5.1-3]
[14:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [arm64] (hirsute-proposed) [1.5.1-4]
[14:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [armhf] (hirsute-proposed) [1.5.1-3]
[14:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted s390-tools [s390x] (hirsute-proposed) [2.14.0-2ubuntu1]
[14:19] <apw> seb128, mine doesn't trigger on URLs, though how that works i think triggered it to miss the one above
[14:20] <seb128> apw, rbalint, I'm not sure hexchat accepts regexps for highlights
[14:20] <seb128> and I'm not going to change to a text IRC client
[14:20] <apw>   * CVE-2020-12351 // CVE-2020-12352 // CVE-2020-24490
[14:20] <apw>     - [Config] raspi: Disable BlueZ highspeed support
[14:20] <rbalint> seb128, apw call signs are immensely useful for people seeking for help, please keep watching it
[14:20] <apw> oh how much do i hate paste buffers,, just how much
[14:20] <seb128> rbalint, I was suggesting we change in something which isn't used 95% of the time in urls copied
[14:21] <apw> seb128, mine is definatly a regexp similar to that above, but with beginning of line too
[14:21] <seb128> apw, what IRC client are you using?
[14:22] <rbalint> seb128, google says that hexchat has regexp script
[14:22] <apw> seb128, weechat ... which has them by default, i am feeling hexchat has a plugin or something for this; i am sure people in the kernel-team do this
[14:22] <seb128> rbalint, thanks for the hint, I'm adding a backlog item to my todo to check on that, the default preferences doesn't have that option
[14:23] <seb128> apw, right, what rbalint said
[14:23] <rbalint> seb128, i hope it will work for you
[14:23] <rbalint> seb128, i think the established call sign is quite natural
[14:24] <seb128> right, just conflicted as I said :)
[14:24] <rbalint> by the way apw could you please merge https://code.launchpad.net/~rbalint/autopkgtest-cloud/+git/autopkgtest-cloud/+merge/393876 to let cross-toolchain-base finaly
[14:24] <rbalint> lly pass on arm64?
[14:25] <rbalint> apw, Laney and i have a bunch of hints, too: https://code.launchpad.net/~rbalint/britney/+git/hints-ubuntu/+merge/393859
[15:03] <doko> mwhudson, LocutusOfBorg: test builds running in https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-toolchain-r/+archive/ubuntu/test/+packages?field.name_filter=&field.status_filter=published&field.series_filter=hirsute
[16:01] <bdmurray> waveform: the test case in bug 1903048 shouldn't refer to a PPA
[16:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted bluez [source] (groovy-proposed) [5.55-0ubuntu1.1]
[16:05] <bdmurray> waveform: I fieed it
[16:06] <bdmurray> fixed?
[16:06] <bdmurray> something
[16:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apport [source] (groovy-proposed) [2.20.11-0ubuntu50.2]
[16:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apport [source] (focal-proposed) [2.20.11-0ubuntu27.13]
[16:34] <bdmurray> sil2100: What does "Let's think about it in the nearest time" mean practically? bug 1830746
[16:48] <teward> sil2100: you busy?
[16:48] <teward> or you able to poke agordejo in NEW since you were looking at it last?
[17:13] <vorlon> mwhudson: https://code.launchpad.net/~mwhudson/autopkgtest-cloud/+git/autopkgtest-cloud/+merge/393889 deployed, you can reschedule tests at any time
[17:17] <Laney> rbalint: can you rebase pls?
[17:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ggd-utils [s390x] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.0.7+ds-2] (no packageset)
[17:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ggd-utils [amd64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.0.7+ds-2] (no packageset)
[17:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ggd-utils [ppc64el] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.0.7+ds-2] (no packageset)
[17:21] <rbalint> Laney, just saw the ping, thanks for the merge
[17:21] <Laney> only one of them, the big_packages thing conflicts now
[17:22] <rbalint> Laney, ah, that one!
[17:24] <rbalint> Laney, done
[17:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ggd-utils [armhf] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.0.7+ds-2] (no packageset)
[17:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ggd-utils [arm64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.0.7+ds-2] (no packageset)
[17:29] <Laney> cheers
[17:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1032.33~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[17:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted adcli [source] (groovy-proposed) [0.9.0-1ubuntu1.1]
[17:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ggd-utils [riscv64] (hirsute-proposed/universe) [0.0.7+ds-2] (no packageset)
[17:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure-5.4 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.4.0-1032.33~18.04.1]
[17:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd-glib [source] (groovy-proposed) [1.58-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>]
[17:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted snapd-glib [source] (focal-proposed) [1.58-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>]
[18:02] <bdmurray> Eickmeyer[m]: can you explain the SRU of darktable to me? The description in bug 1903892 mentions "introduction of new dependencies" but no new dependencies were actually added to the package.
[18:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ruby2.7 [source] (groovy-proposed) [2.7.1-3ubuntu1.1]
[18:10] <Eickmeyer[m]> bdmurray: You know, now that I look at it, there's really no difference other than the **removal** of deps. It's really just a Debian pull with LocutusOfBorg 's delta inserted. Perhaps we can treat as a no-change rebuild?
[18:11] <Eickmeyer[m]> I had to refresh my memory as to what was going on there. A lot has happened in my life this past week.
[18:11] <bdmurray> Eickmeyer[m]: So removing the Depends actually fixes the issue
[18:11] <Eickmeyer[m]> bdmurray: According to upstream, yes.
[18:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: efivar (focal-proposed/main) [37-2ubuntu2.1 => 37-2ubuntu2.2] (core)
[18:17] <juliank> FWIW, I filed a Chrome bug about update_excuses.html rendering speed at https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1149988
[18:17] <juliank> Because um Firefox is two times faster and actually usable
[18:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted darktable [source] (groovy-proposed) [3.2.1-3~ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>]
[18:22] <Laney> might want to upload the html in case it changes before someone gets to it?
[18:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nova [source] (focal-proposed) [2:21.1.0-0ubuntu2]
[18:28] <teward> ubuntu-archive: in case sil2100 doesn't get to it, can someone look at agordejo in hirsute NEW please?  (cc Eickmeyer Eickmeyer[m] who is the driver behind wanting this in the repos)
[18:29] <bdmurray> seb128: bug 1861769 is missing SRU info
[18:38] <sil2100> Oh!
[18:38] <sil2100> It got re-uploaded!
[18:39] <teward> sil2100: yes, it did
[18:39] <teward> i reuploaded it.. um... *checks date*
[18:40] <teward> ... five days ago :p
[18:40] <teward> sil2100: ^
[18:40] <sil2100> I can take care of it tomorrow morning, since now it's already late evening here and I already feel I overstayed doing work
[18:40] <teward> makes sense.
[18:40] <sil2100> hm, did you guys ping me about it after re-uploading? Since I remember poking last week about if it's reuploaded or not
[18:40] <teward> sil2100: i did yes
[18:40] <teward> and i pinged ubuntu-archive too shortly after i reupped it
[18:40] <sil2100> Then apologies, missed that
[18:41] <teward> *tosses rotting fish at sil2100 for reasons* :P
[18:41] <teward> 'cause that one's deserved xD
[18:41] <teward> ANYWAYS
[18:41] <teward> as long as it's on your list for tomorrow
[18:41] <sil2100> Well, I can't keep track of every ping sadly, but it'll be done now sure
[18:41] <teward> i'll prod you again tomorrow.  becuase i'm incessantly annoying that way >:D
[18:41] <sil2100> Added to my TODO!
[18:45] <sil2100> And just for the record - 5 days ago was on Friday, so obviously I wasn't doing queue reviews on the weekend, so it was there only for ~2-3 workdays
[18:45] <sil2100> ;)
[18:45] <Eickmeyer[m]> sil2100: Thanks so much for your help, even in advance! :)
[18:47] <sil2100> Thanks for the re-ping though, there's uh, a bit too many queues to look at!
[18:48] <teward> yup
[18:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubiquity (groovy-proposed/main) [20.10.13 => <IP_ADDRESS>] (desktop-core)
[19:05] <seb128> bdmurray, hum, sorry, I though I had typed those, maybe I screwed something, description updated now!
[19:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubiquity [source] (groovy-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>]
[19:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gdm3 [source] (focal-proposed) [3.36.3-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>]
[21:04] <vorlon> so who's blindly retrying all the haskell failed packages this time
[21:05] <vorlon> ah, rbalint :)
[21:33] <vorlon> apw: could we perhaps drop the di packages from the linux-riscv source package :)
[21:35] <apw> vorlon, i have been meaning to ask do we need them anywhere by default
[21:35] <apw> sforshee, ^
[21:38] <sforshee> vorlon, apw: ack, we can drop those when we update it for 5.10 then SRU the changes back to f/g
[21:41] <vorlon> apw: I've been reluctant to ask you to drop them across the board because there might be some userspace udebs that we have floating around still (built from source packages in Debian that ship both debs and udebs) that have dependencies on provides of some of those udebs
[21:41] <vorlon> apw: but I think for riscv we really don't care
[21:41] <vorlon> (I mean, we don't /really/ care for the other archs either, it just makes some of the reports messier if there are uninstallable udebs)
[21:41] <apw> vorlon, oh yeah, dependancies ... uggg, it would publish _so_ much faster if they were one
[21:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xorg-server [source] (focal-proposed) [2:1.20.8-2ubuntu2.5]
[21:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ruby2.7 [source] (focal-proposed) [2.7.0-5ubuntu1.2]
[22:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wpa [source] (bionic-proposed) [2:2.6-15ubuntu2.6]
[22:55] <mwhudson> uh this doesn't look good https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/running#pkg-dask
[22:56] <mwhudson> (running for 30 mins and got nowhere yet)
[22:57] <xnox> vorlon:  apw: imho we should make britney ignore udeb dependencies. because there are too many virtual provides from kernel <-> userspace udebs, and we don't care about unwinding them in locksteps
[22:58] <xnox> rather ignore udeb installability.
[22:58] <xnox> i wonder if i can just take a dump of all of the udebs, and declare them as available
[23:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (groovy-proposed/main) [1:20.10.13 => 1:20.10.14] (core)
[23:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubiquity [source] (groovy-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>]
[23:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (focal-proposed/main) [1:20.04.28 => 1:20.04.29] (core)


[02:05] <Nafai> I uploaded packages to a PPA about 15 minutes or so ago and I can't find them in the build queue anywhere on https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+builds
[02:05] <Nafai> dput claimed the upload was successful
[02:09] <Nafai> The package was mpfr 2.4.0-1ubuntu1 for the PPA named "nafai"
[02:09] <Nafai> This is my first time trying to use a PPA
[02:13] <jml> Nafai: all the soyuz guys are asleep right now, it seems.
[02:13] <Nafai> Ok
[02:13]  * jml looks around for bugs / questions that might be relevant here
[02:13] <Nafai> I'm patient
[02:14] <jml> Nafai: do you have a link for the build page?
[02:14] <Nafai>         try:
[02:15] <Nafai> Whoops, wrong paste
[02:15] <Nafai> Something other than https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+builds or are you referring to something else?
[02:15] <jml> I don't really know what I'm referring to :)
[02:15] <mwhudson> Nafai: a link to your ppa maybe?
[02:16] <jml> https://edge.launchpad.net/~nafai/+archive/ppa is empty
[02:17] <Nafai> Hrm
[02:17] <Nafai> Maybe the instructions on the PPA howto were wrong
[02:18] <jml> Nafai: got a URL for the howto?
[02:18] <Nafai> What should incoming be in my ~/.dput.cf ?
[02:18] <maxb> PPA builds don't show up on /ubuntu/+builds
[02:18] <Nafai> https://help.launchpad.net/Packaging/PPA
[02:18] <mwhudson> Nafai: i'm pretty sure that if something went wrong in the initial processing, you should have got a mail about it
[02:19] <Nafai> maxb: Ah!  That's my problem :)
[02:19] <Nafai> mwhudson: Ah, there's the mail, just took a while getting here
[02:19] <Nafai> Nevermind me :)
[02:19] <mwhudson> the usual mistake being accidentally trying to upload a package to ubuntu
[02:21] <maxb> Between the freeze, and having two hppa buildds again, the primary ubuntu build queue is the nearest to empty it's been for a long time :-)
[02:21] <jml> Nafai: please feel free to update the wiki page or file some bugs about this.
[02:21] <Nafai> will do
[02:22] <mwhudson> maxb: i guess a new architecture will do that
[02:25] <Nafai> Do the PPAs have a build page?
[02:26] <Nafai> Oh, n/m.  I see it
[02:26] <Nafai> Yay, it is working this time.
[02:26] <Nafai> Thanks for the help guys
[02:30] <mwhudson> np
[04:41] <poolie> jml, is bug 293710 really Low?
[04:45] <stdin> it's an inconvenience rather than a blocking issue, Low is probably appropriate
[04:47] <jml> poolie: in a choice between "High" and "Low", I'd pick "Low"
[04:49] <jml> poolie: There are about 50 open code review bugs (see https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad-bazaar/+bugs?field.tag=code-review). Not all of them can be high priority, sadly.
[04:50] <poolie> fairenough
[04:50] <poolie> that list does look sensibly sorted
[05:07] <jml> poolie: so, if I were doing the work, I'd probably just get a list of code-review ui bugs and then do them in chunks that makes sense re implementation.
[05:11] <OsamaK> Hello. I just uploaded a po translation file, it's marked as 'blocked'. What does that mean?

[05:51] <jml> poolie: ping
[05:51] <jml> poolie: why do you think https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad-bazaar/+bug/238453 is intermittent?
[06:02] <mwhudson> jml: that's another way of saying "the scanner sometimes runs slowly" i think
[06:03] <jml> mwhudson: hmm. in that case, I will close the bug and make sure we have another bug about fixing the scanner.
[06:09] <thumper> jml: it may also have been mirror delay hitting
[06:09] <jml> thumper: well, that was the original cause, for sure.
[06:13] <mwhudson> not if loggerhead had a different view to the branch page
[06:13] <mwhudson> but anyway
[06:13] <mwhudson> make scanner part of puller, make puller scheduling smarter, optionally add message queue pixie dust --> win
[06:17] <spm> any leftover pixie dust for loggerhead?
[06:17] <spm> ... no particular reason for asking
[06:24] <OsamaK> Any idea about my question?
[06:33] <mwhudson> OsamaK: sorry, no
[06:33] <OsamaK> fine what about the other 120 people :P
[06:34] <mrooney> What is considered the proper way to push to a newly created project? bzr push lp:~lpname/proj/trunk, then go into launchpad and set trunk as that branch?
[06:41] <mwhudson> mrooney: yes
[06:42] <mwhudson> mrooney: possibly one day it will be automatically set as the trunk, but not yet
[06:42] <mrooney> yeah, that would be slick
[06:42] <mrooney> at least if the pusher is the project owner
[06:42] <mwhudson> yes, i think that's one of the reasons it hasn't happened yet
[06:43] <mrooney> mwhudson: what is one of the reasons?
[06:43] <mwhudson> depends-on: telepathy
[06:43] <mwhudson> this kind of fuzzy thinking
[06:43] <mwhudson> if it's pushed by a project maintainer and is called trunk though, that would be a start
[06:45] <mrooney> that doesn't seem fuzzy or depending on telepathy
[06:46] <mrooney> that was my first intution, to push to lp:projname, then I tried lp:projname/trunk, then I gave in and did it the other way :)
[07:23] <mwhudson> mrooney: an interesting data point :)
[07:54] <jms1989> anyone know why the staging server is not working?
[08:44] <jms1989> anyone know why the staging server is not working?
[10:54] <domas> bazaar.launchpad sick?
[10:54] <james_w> domas: seems so
[10:54] <domas> 64 bytes from <IP_ADDRESS>: icmp_seq=2 ttl=48 time=2152.608 ms
[10:54] <domas> 64 bytes from <IP_ADDRESS>: icmp_seq=3 ttl=48 time=1153.349 ms
[10:54] <domas> hah
[10:54] <domas> DoS!
[10:56] <elmo> we're working on it
[10:57] <domas> thanks, folks! :)
[10:57] <domas> no urge, just wanted to show a new Feature to the world! :)
[11:03] <amondo> launchpad bzr was down a few minutes ago
[11:03] <amondo> i got "connect to host bazaar.launchpad.net port 22: No route to host"
[11:04] <amondo> but now it is back
[11:04] <amondo> is there like a server status page for the launchpad servers?
[11:05] <philn> heya
[11:06] <philn> i'm trying to push a branch but there's a lock on the server and i can't remove it with that break-lock command.. can someone help me?
[11:06] <philn> lock is lp-45632656:///~elisa-developers/elisa/tv_movie_db/.bzr/branch/lock
[11:21] <beuno> philn, bzr break-lock lp:~/user/project/branch?
[11:25] <philn> beuno: ok that worked, but bzr break lp-45632656:///~elisa-developers/elisa/tv_movie_db/.bzr/branch/lock (which was the command suggested  by bzr) did not
[11:26] <beuno> philn, yeap, it's a bug in bzr, I think it's filed, but if not, i will
[11:27] <jpds> Should there be a text field on Launchpad bugs saying: "This bug affects %d people". ?
[11:27] <jpds> Or somewhere I can find the data?
[11:28] <beuno> jpds, it's currently not exposed
[11:28] <beuno> you can order bug listings by number of affected users
[11:28] <beuno> but the actual number isn't exposed
[11:29] <jpds> beuno: Ah, thanks.
[11:31] <philn> thanks for the help beuno, seeya
[13:01] <domas> ghm, loggerhead is actually laggerhead :)
[14:16] <domas> will loggerhead ever start working again?
[14:16] <domas> :)
[14:19] <Ursinha> beuno, ^
[14:19] <beuno> domas, it's down?
[14:19] <domas> beuno: lagged for multiple (>12)h
[14:19] <domas> compare https://code.launchpad.net/~mydumper/mydumper/trunk and http://dammit.lt:8080/mydumper/changes
[14:21] <domas> well, maybe not 12, but definitely >4
[14:22] <beuno> domas, ah
[14:22] <beuno> that's not loggerhead
[14:22] <beuno> but I see what you mean
[14:22] <domas> beuno: ghm, thats the only implication I see, I can successfully clone/branch up-to-date trees
[14:22] <beuno> loggerhead is the *only* think that's working!
[14:22] <beuno> http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~mydumper/mydumper/trunk/changes
[14:22] <beuno> it's Launchpad's branch scanner
[14:22] <domas> ah!
[14:23] <domas> indeed
[14:23] <domas> sorry for confusing
[14:23] <domas> :)
[14:23] <beuno> no worries
[14:24] <beuno> we're following up on the branch scanner problem
[14:24] <domas> hehe, oki!
[14:24] <beuno> hopefully we'll get it back up soon
[14:24] <domas> today it was some bigger crash, I noticed
[14:25] <domas> I should brush up my UI skills and add 'hide column' functionality to loggerhead :)
[14:26] <beuno> oh, patches are very wlecome on Loggerhead  ;)
[14:26] <domas> beautiful thing so far :)
[14:26] <domas> iterating colors, etc, yummy! :-)))
[14:36] <intellectronica> beuno: speaking of which, what do i need to do to get my download link branch merged? can you review it? or should i ask rockstar?
[14:39] <beuno> intellectronica, file a merge request, and I'll try to get to it first
[14:39] <beuno> if rockstar does, he can get the karma
[14:39] <beuno> maybe even mwhudson, who is currently playing around in LH
[14:43] <domas> hehe, feature request, in 'add file' -> "make tarball out of bzr branch" :))
[14:43] <domas> would allow me to release more than 5 times a day! \o/
[14:43] <beuno> domas, sounds like a great idea
[14:43] <beuno> if you file a bug requesting it
[14:43] <beuno> it just may happen...  ;)
[14:43] <domas> hehehe
[14:44] <domas> <3
[14:48] <domas> beuno: bug#325761 \o/
[14:48] <beuno> bug 325761
[14:49] <domas> huh
[14:49] <domas> poor ubott
[14:49] <domas> u
[14:49] <rockstar> intellectronica, request a review from me.
[15:06] <cgregan> Does anyone know if there is a way to search bugs for milestone=none?
[15:13] <leonardr> ^-intellectronica, maybe you can help cgregan
[15:14] <intellectronica> cgregan: unfortunately not. iirc someone filed a but about this just a few days ago. let me try and find it
[15:14] <cgregan> thanks leonardr, intellectronica
[15:20] <domas> heeee, branch scanner is there!
[15:20] <domas> yay people
[15:20] <bebraw> sounds useful
[15:28] <intellectronica> cgregan: i can find that bug. maybe i imagined it. care to file one?
[15:28] <intellectronica> cgregan: "can't", that is
[15:30] <cgregan> intellectronica: I would be happy to
[15:30] <cgregan> thanks
[15:33] <matsubara> bug 70709
[15:36] <matsubara> cgregan: ^
[15:37] <cgregan> matsubara: thanks.....I will dup the one I just entered
[15:47] <intellectronica> matsubara, cgregan: i knew i remembered _something_ about such a bug :)
[15:47] <cgregan> intellectronica: It has a rather low number.....any chance it is getting fixed any time soon?
[15:48] <intellectronica> cgregan: can't promise anything, but the renewed interest in this bug means that yes, we'll probably try to do this soon
[15:49] <intellectronica> cgregan: b.t.w you can try and use the webservice api to get this data. are you comfortably doing this sort of thing? if yes i'm happy to help
[15:49] <cgregan> intellectronica: excellent
[15:50] <cgregan> intellectronica: Unfortunately I am no where near a coder.
[16:30] <Dal90> Hi -- I have a new project that there was license question on.  I've fixed that license, but it's still in limbo with translations under review.  What needs to be done to fix this?  https://translations.launchpad.net/getmiro/3.0/+imports
[16:54] <epsy> Are there any icons for blueprints?
[17:29] <AlexC_> morning
[17:29] <spitfire_> evening :P
[17:29] <AlexC_> I'm wondering how LP handles changing translations files. Does it merge them in with the older uploaded ones, and any strings added/deleted will be handled correctly
[17:29] <AlexC_> spitfire_, evening here to =)
[17:32] <intellectronica> AlexC_: maybe henninge can help you?
[17:32] <AlexC_> =)
[17:34] <henninge> AlexC_: Uploading new files updates previous *uploaded* translated strings. Strings *changed* in Launchpad are not updated, unless they were untranslated before.
[17:35] <AlexC_> henninge, ok thanks. One other thing, how does the process work for copy files into a new series? I'm a little confused about which way to do this. If we were to do translations for 'trunk', when we come to release say, 2.3 of our software - what do we do with the translations?
[17:41] <henninge> AlexC_: You will have to re-import them. There is copying of translations between product series.
[17:41] <henninge> AlexC_: *no* copying. Sorry.
[17:42] <AlexC_> henninge, and we'd then loose all translations once we re-import?
[17:42] <AlexC_> unless we can also upload the .po files?
[17:43] <henninge> AlexC_: Oh yes, you can!
[17:43] <AlexC_> ok cool, kind of a ball ache but it'll do I guess =)
[17:43] <AlexC_> thanks very much
[17:44] <henninge> AlexC_: hang on, there is a help page for uploads, trying to find it
[17:44] <ArepaKing> Hello Everyone.. I am trying to register my GPG key in lauchpad but I keep getting the same message over and over.. can somebody give me some guidance?
[17:44] <ArepaKing> the message is: The signed content does not match the message found in the email.
[17:48] <ArepaKing> hello...
[17:50] <mrevell> leonardr: Are you able to help ArepaKing?
[17:51] <ArepaKing> thanks mrevell
[17:53] <henninge> AlexC_: https://help.launchpad.net/Translations/YourProject
[17:53] <AlexC_> henninge, thanks
[17:53] <henninge> henninge: Please read the section "Ensuring a successful import"
[17:53] <henninge> AlexC_: ^
[17:54] <henninge> AlexC_: That is about the naming conventions for the files so that the import runs smoothly. Prepare a tarball like that and upload it, should work fine.
[17:54] <AlexC_> henninge, is there any further explanation of: "you upload templates in a tarball, so the system can see what directories you want them in; give each template its own directory."
[17:54] <leonardr> ArepaKing, what client are you using to send the mail?
[17:55] <leonardr> if you have a copy of the mail, send it to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>and i'll look at it
[17:55] <henninge> AlexC_: No :-( I just saw that, too...
[17:55] <henninge> AlexC_: I was too quick in my judgement.
[17:55] <AlexC_> henninge, hum, ok. hehe, no worries =)
[17:56] <ArepaKing> Hi leonardr.. I will forward you the email right away..
[17:56] <henninge> AlexC_: But it is easy: name the template like the translation domain (domain.pot) and the po files with the language code (de.po, fr.po, etc).
[17:57] <AlexC_> henninge, yeah, just generating all of those now. Thing is, we have many .pot files (one for each module within our project) - how will Launchpad handle that?
[17:57] <henninge> AlexC_: put the po files in a directory that is named like the translation domain, too. You can put the template in there, too.
[17:57] <ArepaKing> leonardr.. done
[17:57] <AlexC_> henninge, we currently have no .po files, was just thinking ahead
[17:58] <henninge> AlexC_: yeah, one directory per translation domain/template. Do not mix pofiles for different translation domains.
[17:58] <Rinchen> ArepaKing, give leonardr the bug number too please if you have not
[17:58] <ArepaKing> all right
[17:59] <ArepaKing> this is the bug number: https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/launchpad-documentation/+bug/323283/
[17:59] <AlexC_> henninge, so for example, 4 modules = 4 directories (each named of the translations domain), with a single .pot file in them?
[17:59] <ArepaKing> thanks Rinchen..
[18:02] <henninge> AlexC_: It only gets important for the po files later.
[18:02] <AlexC_> henninge, ah ok, so I can just throw all of these .pot files in a .tar.gz archive and put that up?
[18:03] <henninge> AlexC_: I was gonna say: but that structure is OK.
[18:03] <henninge> AlexC_: Yes, as long as they are named domain1.pot, domain2.pot, etc
[18:03] <AlexC_> henninge, they sure are. Awesome, thanks for the helps
[18:04] <henninge> AlexC_: pleasure
[18:42] <BUGabundo> is this a LP high load /timeout or a apport one ?
[18:42] <BUGabundo> http://paste.ubuntu.com/114124/
[18:43] <BUGabundo> leonardr: ping
[18:44] <matsubara> looks like apport
[18:44] <matsubara> BUGabundo: and it's just a warning, so I don't think it was fatal
[18:45] <matsubara> seems like apport completed the upload successfully
[18:45] <matsubara> well, at least it started upload, not sure if it finished
[18:48] <BUGabundo> it did finish, matsubara. at least it looks like everything (or somethings) got attached to the report
[18:49] <BUGabundo> but since you guys are changing EDGE timeouts
[18:49] <BUGabundo> I thouth it would be better to let you know
[18:51] <matsubara> does apport use edge?
[18:51] <matsubara> BUGabundo: it's not related to performance work but thanks for letting us know
[18:51] <BUGabundo> I do...
[18:51] <BUGabundo> so I think it will use it too, once Firefox logins
[18:51] <BUGabundo> matsubara: np