[10:19] <apw> chiluk_, when a version of nvidia goes complete off support, we transition people to something newer.
[10:20] <apw> chiluk_, we "only" have like on "development" version *5 and two stable versions *0 live at any time, plus there are sometimes a long-term-support branch also *0 where nvidia have dropped a slew of old hardware from later streams.
[10:22] <apw> croraf, that file lists source package handles, that is <series>:<source-package>.  the installation names, the semantic names, move around between packages
[10:23] <apw> croraf, a new source comes into existance often with -wip as its name, testing happens, then it takes over the -edge name.  once full testing and acceptance is complete it takes over the "base" name, and the old source is redundant.  this is done to allow rollback quickly within an sru-cycle.
[10:23] <apw> croraf, that said, the variants (as they are known) for those sources could easily be added to the output.
[18:56] <tomreyn> is this on your radar?
[18:56] <tomreyn> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1956849


[15:54] <nacc> o/
[15:54] <nacc> (a bit early)
[15:59] <cpaelzer> o/
[15:59] <jgrimm> o/
[16:01] <powersj> o/
[16:01] <caribou> \o
[16:01] <jgrimm> i believe rbasak is on point today?
[16:02] <rbasak> o/
[16:02] <smoser> o/
[16:02] <jgrimm> rbasak, i believe you are chair today?
[16:02] <rbasak> Ah yes. Sorry!
[16:03] <rbasak> #startmeeting ubuntu-server
[16:03] <meetingology> Meeting started Tue Dec 20 16:03:03 2016 UTC.  The chair is rbasak. Information about MeetBot at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/meetingology.
[16:03] <meetingology> Available commands: action commands idea info link nick
[16:03] <jgrimm> no worries
[16:03] <rbasak> #topic Review ACTION points from previous meeting
[16:03] <rbasak> Nothing here.
[16:03] <jgrimm> \o/
[16:03] <rbasak> #topic Development Release
[16:03] <rbasak> #link https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ZestyZapus/ReleaseSchedule
[16:03] <rbasak> #link http://reqorts.qa.ubuntu.com/reports/rls-mgr/rls-z-tracking-bug-tasks.html#ubuntu-server
[16:04] <rbasak> "Active work that may need wider communication"
[16:04] <rbasak> Anything to discuss?
[16:04] <jgrimm> nothing new there at all
[16:04] <rbasak> #topic Server & Cloud Bugs & SRU/Pending Uploads (caribou)
[16:04] <rbasak> caribou: o/
[16:04] <caribou> \o
[16:05]  * caribou getting the SRU list ready if you can wait a minute
[16:06] <caribou> LP: #1447715 - dhclient -6: Can't bind to dhcp address: Cannot assign requested address
[16:06] <caribou>   - Series to SRU : xenial
[16:06] <caribou>   - Owners : Dan Streetman
[16:06] <caribou> LP: #1452202 - ubuntu preseed install fails to set a hostname
[16:06] <caribou>   - Series to SRU : xenial
[16:06] <caribou>   - Owners : Eric Desrochers
[16:06] <caribou> LP: #1579609 - os-prober bug resulting in possible FS corruption
[16:06] <caribou>   - Series to SRU : xenial
[16:06] <caribou>   - Owners : Eric Desrochers
[16:06] <caribou> LP: #1621340 - [SRU]'multipath -r' causes /dev/mapper/<wwid> being removed
[16:07] <caribou>   - Series to SRU : yakkety xenial
[16:07] <caribou>   - Owners : Unowned Hua Zhang
[16:07] <caribou> LP: #1640382 - Segfault event notifier because of race condition
[16:07] <caribou>   - Series to SRU : trusty
[16:07] <caribou>   - Owners : Seyeong Kim
[16:07] <caribou> LP: #1640676 - [SRU] libvirt 1.2.12 live-migration corrupts some instances
[16:07] <caribou>   - Series to SRU : trusty
[16:07] <caribou>   - Owners : Unowned
[16:07] <caribou> LP: #1642903 - introduce disk/by-id (model_serial) symlinks for NVMe drives
[16:07] <caribou>   - Series to SRU : trusty
[16:07] <caribou>   - Owners : Unowned
[16:07] <caribou> LP: #1648901 - SPNEGO crash on mechanism failure
[16:07] <caribou>   - Series to SRU : xenial
[16:07] <caribou>   - Owners : Eric Desrochers
[16:08]  * caribou is going to revisit the SRU list script to make it less bulky
[16:08] <rbasak> I suggest just listing the package names if the goal is to prevent duplicate work/collisions on upload.
[16:08] <rbasak> Maybe that list would be easier for people to remember, and they can always contact you with more details if needed (or look at Launchpad)
[16:08] <caribou> rbasak: good idea
[16:09] <caribou> minor tweak anyway
[16:09] <rbasak> caribou: thank you for the list though! Do you have anything else for us? Any questions for caribou?
[16:09] <jgrimm> nope. thanks caribou
[16:09] <rbasak> #topic Weekly Updates & Questions for the QA Team (powersj)
[16:09] <rbasak> powersj: o/
[16:09] <smoser> caribou, you'll push on someone to sru team for cloudsigma cloud-init ?
[16:10] <smoser> bah /me types too slow
[16:10] <caribou> smoser: did already but didn't get any thing back
[16:10] <rbasak> The SRU team is mostly likely to be on vacation until January now.
[16:10] <smoser> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1648380
[16:10] <smoser> well, it'd be good imo to get that into -proposed
[16:10] <caribou> problem with this one is that, once SRUed, it still requires an image respin
[16:10] <smoser> and also a cloud-init in yakkety -proposed with same fixes.
[16:11] <powersj> howdy - short week did lots of bug triage, and continue to get tests happy again with yakkety containers. Still waiting on update from IS on that. Want to work with smoser to get my merge accepted for cloud-init, otherwise, bug triage and getting some small tests written.
[16:11] <smoser> caribou, well, for them, they're using an old image as it is, so upgrade will work now (where before it would not i think) and yeah, they need a new image, but have to get into sru first.
[16:11] <smoser> powersj, yeah, i want to get the tests in
[16:11] <rbasak> Thanks powersj! Any questions for powersj?
[16:12] <rbasak> #topic Weekly Updates & Questions for the Kernel Team (smb, sforshee)
[16:12] <rbasak> smb doesn't appear to be here.
[16:12] <cpaelzer> rbasak: smb is out alreay
[16:12] <rbasak> OK, thanks.
[16:13] <rbasak> #topic Upcoming Call For Papers
[16:13] <rbasak> Anything coming up?
[16:13] <rbasak> #topic Ubuntu Server Team Events
[16:13] <rbasak> Nothing of note I think.
[16:14] <rbasak> #topic Open Discussion
[16:14] <rbasak> Anything else to discuss?
[16:14] <rbasak> #topic Announce next meeting date, time and chair
[16:14] <jgrimm> probably last mtg of the year?
[16:14] <smoser> i think so.
[16:14] <rbasak> Yeah there'll be no point having one next week.
[16:15] <jgrimm> anyone disagree?
[16:15] <jgrimm> tho you'd probably be the only one here. :)
[16:15] <rbasak> So the next meeting will be on Tuesday 3 January, 1600 UTC. gaughen will chair.
[16:15] <rbasak> Thanks all!
[16:15] <rbasak> #endmeeting
[16:15] <meetingology> Meeting ended Tue Dec 20 16:15:31 2016 UTC.
[16:15] <meetingology> Minutes:        http://ubottu.com/meetingology/logs/ubuntu-meeting/2016/ubuntu-meeting.2016-12-20-16.03.moin.txt
[16:15] <jgrimm> thanks rbasak
[16:15] <powersj> thanks rbasak
[16:15] <caribou> "♫♫We wish you a merry christmas, we wish you a merry christmas and a happy new year ♫♫"
[16:16] <caribou> thanks!
[16:16] <cpaelzer> thanks caribou
[16:16] <cpaelzer> thanks rbasak
[16:16] <cpaelzer> thanks everybody for a good year
[16:19] <gaughen> thanks caribou now I have that stuck in my head
[16:19] <caribou> gaughen: could be worse
[16:36] <Guestie> Hi
[16:36] <Guestie> Is the meeting happening in 24 minutes?
[16:47] <Guestie> When does the meeting start? I want to make sure.
[18:01] <sarnold> Guestie: which meeting? there was an ubuntu-server meeting in here that started two hours ago


[17:59] <tacorwin> hello
[18:01] <knome> evening
[18:03] <tacorwin> So, was anyone here at the discussion about merging the Docs team and the UM team?
[18:04] <pmatulis> yep
[18:07] <tacorwin> well, as an update, we in the UM team are kind of split down the middle in discussion on the merge.