[05:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libcgns [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [3.4.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libcgns [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [3.4.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libcgns [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [3.4.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libcgns [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [3.4.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libcgns [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [3.4.0-1] (no packageset)
[05:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libcgns [amd64] (focal-proposed) [3.4.0-1]
[05:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libcgns [armhf] (focal-proposed) [3.4.0-1]
[05:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libcgns [arm64] (focal-proposed) [3.4.0-1]
[05:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libcgns [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [3.4.0-1]
[05:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libcgns [s390x] (focal-proposed) [3.4.0-1]
[05:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted petsc [arm64] (focal-proposed) [3.12.2+dfsg1-1]
[05:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted petsc [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [3.12.2+dfsg1-1]
[05:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted petsc [amd64] (focal-proposed) [3.12.2+dfsg1-1]
[05:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted petsc [s390x] (focal-proposed) [3.12.2+dfsg1-1]
[05:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted petsc [armhf] (focal-proposed) [3.12.2+dfsg1-1]
[05:45]  * RAOF assumes vorlon uploaded a no-change rebuild of prepair to focal NEW because he didn't notice he'd sync'd its removal a couple of hours before?
[05:46] <vorlon> RAOF: because my scripts that trigger no-change rebuilds were acting on out-of-date Packages files :/
[05:47] <RAOF> Oops :)
[05:48] <vorlon> I recognized the package names as soon as I got mail about them ;P
[05:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected pprepair [source] (focal-proposed) [0.0~20170614-dd91a21-3build2]
[05:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected prepair [source] (focal-proposed) [0.7.1-3build2]
[05:48] <RAOF> Why is there a prepair and a pprepair package?
[05:49] <RAOF> Who thought that was sensible naming!
[05:49] <RAOF> And that answers the question of whether I should hit the reject button :)
[05:53] <vorlon> also annoying: packages that were uploaded to -proposed before i386 removal have their i386 binaries grow back when migrating to the release pocket because copy-package, that's going to make focal_uninst ugly for a while
[08:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xorg-server-hwe-18.04 (bionic-proposed/main) [2:1.20.4-1ubuntu3~18.04.2 => 2:1.20.5+git20191008-0ubuntu1~18.04.1] (no packageset)
[11:04] <rbalint> Laney, could you please merge https://code.launchpad.net/~rbalint/britney/hints-ubuntu/+merge/376914 for systemd?
[11:51] <rbalint> could anyone from the release team please merge https://code.launchpad.net/~rbalint/britney/hints-ubuntu/+merge/376914 for systemd?
[11:54] <Laney> rbalint: ok, but it would be good if the hints weren't needed :(
[13:20] <rbalint> Laney, i'd love that and i'm about to fix at least armhf
[13:20] <Laney> yay
[13:57] <tjaalton> hmm, no sil2100..
[14:38] <apw> vorlon, perhaps we can write sonething to sync the removals down to -release
[14:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pulseaudio (eoan-proposed/main) [1:13.0-1ubuntu1 => 1:13.0-1ubuntu1.1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[17:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: slepc [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [3.12.1+dfsg1-1] (no packageset)
[17:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: slepc [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [3.12.1+dfsg1-1] (no packageset)
[17:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: slepc [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [3.12.1+dfsg1-1] (no packageset)
[17:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: slepc [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [3.12.1+dfsg1-1] (no packageset)
[18:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: slepc [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [3.12.1+dfsg1-1] (no packageset)
[20:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted util-linux [source] (eoan-proposed) [2.34-0.1ubuntu2.1]
[21:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted slepc [amd64] (focal-proposed) [3.12.1+dfsg1-1]
[21:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted slepc [armhf] (focal-proposed) [3.12.1+dfsg1-1]
[21:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted slepc [arm64] (focal-proposed) [3.12.1+dfsg1-1]
[21:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted slepc [s390x] (focal-proposed) [3.12.1+dfsg1-1]
[21:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted slepc [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [3.12.1+dfsg1-1]
[22:23] <tjaalton> is sil2100 out the rest of the week/year?
[23:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libxcrypt [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1:4.4.10-7] (no packageset)
[23:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-skbio [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [0.5.5-3] (no packageset)


[13:35] <chilversc> Is the status of the mainline build available anywhere, as I notice the 6.4.0-rc7 isn't available yet in the archive, and the cod/mainline/v6.4-rc7 tag isn't present in git://kernel.ubuntu.com/virgin/testing/crack.git
[22:32] <atmark> Hello, I obtained Ubuntu-hwe-5.15-5.15.0-75.82_20.04.1 from Ubuntu git repo. Is there way to compare the commits between Ubuntu-hwe-5.15-5.15.0-75.82_20.04.1 and v5.15.99 upstream kernel ?