[00:01] <vorlon> heh, LP: #2060871, introducing enr0n to idl.  Next up: CORBA!
[00:01] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2060871 in mlpcap (Ubuntu) "please remove mlpcap from the archive" [Undecided, Won't Fix] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2060871
[00:01] <bdmurray> vorlon: Did you hear anything about the importance of this flash-kernel upload?
[00:02] <vorlon> bdmurray: no
[00:02] <bdmurray> Its for the RPi2 so ...
[00:03] <bdrung> it's also installed on the pi zero 2 as well.
[00:04] <liushuyu> vorlon: is there a reason to do those removals? Bad binaries?
[00:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mlpcap (noble-proposed/universe) [0.9-21build3 => 0.9-21ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[00:04] <vorlon> liushuyu: for gfortran? FTBFS on all archs due to patchelf being busted and the packages relying on patchelf to do things any sensible build system would handle at link time
[00:05] <vorlon> bdrung: "the pi zero 2" - er, do we support that?
[00:06] <vorlon> I can't remember if it's 32-bit or 64-bit but
[00:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mlpcap [source] (noble-proposed) [0.9-21ubuntu1]
[00:07] <bdrung> vorlon, yes. it's similar to the pi3 but only with half a gig memory
[00:07] <liushuyu> vorlon: okay, then odc / eckit / magics++ must be several of those as well
[00:07] <bdrung> i have one running that i am using for armhf testing
[00:07] <vorlon> ok
[00:19] <mwhudson> liushuyu: yes odc / eckit is certainly the same thing at root
[00:19] <mwhudson> haven't looked at magics++ to say either way
[00:25] <vpa1977> liushuyu: same with medview/medkit -> medkit fails to build due to a missing symbol (wrong version of odc)
[00:53] <mwhudson> i'm retrying lsh-utils to see if it hangs again
[00:59] <mwhudson> oh i see the tests fail and then the build times out
[01:06] <mwhudson> anyone have any idea what is going on with incus?
[01:06] <mwhudson> as in<EMAIL_ADDRESS>[01:09] <sarnold> https://github.com/lxc/incus/blob/ebe074f269f061d316820ea474b759a8aa83ddda/internal/server/task/task_test.go#L87
[01:09] <sarnold> it seems vaguely like it's checking a feature of the golang runtime?
[01:10] <mwhudson> uh also looks like the sort of test that might fail on an overloaded vm
[01:11] <sarnold> hah yeah
[01:16] <mwhudson> does anyone have an arm64 vm running i can log into?
[01:20] <mwhudson> taking a look at mrgingham
[01:21] <mwhudson> mrgingham_pywrap.c:6:10: fatal error: numpy/arrayobject.h: No such file or directory how is that arch specific
[01:21] <mwhudson> i presume amd64 would fail now too
[01:38] <mwhudson> uh
[01:42] <mwhudson> ginggs: python3-numpy no longer ships a symlink /usr/include/python3.XY/numpy ??
[01:43] <mwhudson> oh i see you're supposed to use pkgconf now?
[01:53] <liushuyu> do we have an updated list now?
[02:02] <vpa1977> taking ncract?
[02:02] <vpa1977> ncrack
[02:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mrgingham (noble-proposed/universe) [1.24-1build3 => 1.24-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[02:08] <liushuyu> Did anyone take mrtdreader?
[02:08] <liushuyu> Can't search any in the scroll back
[02:08] <sarnold> I've got scrollback, you're the only one to say mrtdreader in a long time :)
[02:09] <liushuyu> sarnold: Ah thanks!
[02:09] <liushuyu> taking mrtdreader
[02:10] <mwhudson> liushuyu: i have it
[02:10] <mwhudson> it's in the paste
[02:10] <mwhudson> er pad
[02:10] <mwhudson> maybe i didn't say here
[02:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mrgingham [source] (noble-proposed) [1.24-1ubuntu1]
[02:11] <sarnold> :(
[02:11] <mwhudson> oh
[02:11] <mwhudson> er wait
[02:12] <mwhudson> liushuyu: just uploading mrtdreader now
[02:12] <mwhudson> netdiag next
[02:12] <bdmurray> britney are you okay?
[02:12] <bdmurray> I'm getting a 503...
[02:13] <liushuyu> mwhudson: Okay
[02:13] <liushuyu> skipping
[02:13] <liushuyu> taking netdiag
[02:14] <mwhudson> er i said that too :-) but i haven't done anything yet. i'll take nsis
[02:15] <mwhudson> ValueError: invalid literal for int() with base 10: '4build1':
[02:15] <mwhudson> what are you doing
[02:15] <sarnold> hah
[02:18] <liushuyu> '4build1': > JavaScript: > parseInt('4build1') > 4
[02:21] <bdmurray> I've pinged IS
[02:21] <tsimonq2> ubuntu-release: SPOF WRT Unity> IME the de facto contact if rs2009 hasn't been around are the people who help him upload (Erich or myself). Agree that we tried to prevent against this. Pinged rs2009, that being said the alternative is worse than a blind respin in this case. Happy to explain further.
[02:22] <tsimonq2> Xubuntu noted issues with installs that have network but can't reach it. bluesabre indicates it's a final bug not a Beta blocker, asked if he could file on LP for tracking
[02:23] <bdmurray> tsimonq2: I'm really not following what you are trying to say regarding unity.
[02:25] <tsimonq2> bdmurray: There's an enabled install step in Calamares that, right now, has no backup ends connected to it. Looks like a prototype screen. An oversight of mine combined with a lack of testing eyes.
[02:27] <tsimonq2> The option was, we either disable the Customize screen before Beta, or fix it. Aaron chose the latter, I support it, should not be held up on someone MIA at this point in time.
[02:27] <tsimonq2> *shrug* if you disagree, thst's fine, we'll roll with it, just need to figure out messaging then...
[02:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nsis (noble-proposed/universe) [3.09-4build1 => 3.09-4ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[02:28] <bdmurray> What I'm hearing is that you think Ubuntu Unity should respin and that you opinion counts because you've uploaded stuff for the flavour lead?
[02:28] <tsimonq2> Not only uploaded stuff, but put code work towards it on behalf of the flavor, yes
[02:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nsis [source] (noble-proposed) [3.09-4ubuntu1]
[02:31] <tsimonq2> Xubuntu's bug, btw: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/subiquity/+bug/2060897
[02:31] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2060897 in subiquity (Ubuntu) "Xubuntu installation failed: RuntimeError: aborting install since no mirror is usable" [Undecided, New]
[02:32] <mwhudson> why does nullboot build-depend on a specific, obsolete version of shim-signed
[02:33] <mwhudson> juliank: why does nullboot build-depend on a specific, obsolete version of shim-signed ?
[02:33] <mwhudson> i'm looking at nvi
[02:34] <bdmurray> copying calamares-settings-ubuntu rather than waiting for another britney run
[02:35] <tsimonq2> Thanks for that :)
[02:36] <liushuyu> > cat debian/source/format > 1.0
[02:37] <mwhudson> liushuyu: you win a prize!
[02:37] <liushuyu> what kind of historical relic is this
[02:37] <mwhudson> liushuyu: well debian-devel has a thread going from people who don't see the point of git, so
[02:38] <liushuyu> > dpkg-source: info: 'dpkg-source --commit' is not supported by the source format '1.0' > Hmm........
[02:39] <mwhudson> liushuyu: i think you just hack away and dpkg-source -b . will update the diff?
[02:40] <tsimonq2> Just did that yesterday with some of those indicator packages + sbuild, yes I think that's the answer ^^^
[02:42] <liushuyu> mwhudson: Thanks!  I don't understand
[02:49] <tsimonq2> this was pre-modern fanciness :)
[02:51] <vpa1977> liushuyu: look at openjdk-8 =)
[02:51] <sarnold> .. or very-modern entirely-too-fancy ways to maintain one source package that builds for a billion combinations of releases and architectures https://sources.debian.org/src/gcc-14/14-20240330-1/debian/rules/
[02:51] <arraybolt3> hmm, so this isn't a beta issue, but... it could be a problem for all Ubuntu's before Final Release: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wslu/+bug/2060898
[02:51] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2060898 in wslu (Ubuntu) "Trying to install gimp-help-en threatens to install wslu" [Undecided, New]
[02:51] <sarnold> lol "threatens"
[02:51] <arraybolt3> tl;dr: unfortunate apt heuristic solving = system breakage from installing a benign package
[02:52] <arraybolt3> sarnold: well if you saw the beating my system took from that earlier today, you'd understand :P
[02:53] <sarnold> time for w3m to shine! :D
[02:55] <UnivrslSuprBox> I'd like to raise here that I would very much prefer that a package providing www-data *not* be added to ubuntu-minimal, though I'm sure that wasn't a likely choice :)
[02:58] <tsimonq2> Right, it's because firefox is a snap not a deb, thus doesn't provide www-browser to satisfy that...
[03:00] <tsimonq2> New binary package called "firefox-is-snapped" that just exists to provide www-browser? :P
[03:00]  * tsimonq2 runs
[03:00] <mwhudson> excellently timed gpu crash just as i figure out one of the problems with nvi
[03:01] <arraybolt3> woohoo
[03:02] <mwhudson> sarnold: not sure pointing people at the gcc packaging is a kindness
[03:02] <tsimonq2> XD
[03:02] <sarnold> mwhudson: lol :)
[03:02] <sarnold> mwhudson: man, nvi is really pushing your gpu, eh?
[03:02] <mwhudson> sarnold: heh
[03:04] <arraybolt3> the problem is simple, somehow the dia got left behind.
[03:04] <arraybolt3> nvi, dia, get it? ok nvm
[03:04] <mwhudson> although it turns out that i have not in fact understood the problem
[03:11] <tsimonq2> arraybolt3: hi please target the above www-browser bug to Noble/ubuntu-24.04 :)
[03:12] <tsimonq2> can do if unclear
[03:13] <arraybolt3> will do
[03:13] <tsimonq2> <3
[03:13] <arraybolt3> tsimonq2: used target to series and milestone in combination, that correct?
[03:13] <tsimonq2> Yep!
[03:14] <arraybolt3> woot
[03:14] <tsimonq2> thank you :)
[03:32] <mwhudson> uh oom-kill killing shellcheck and taking out wayland?
[03:32] <mwhudson> am confused
[03:33] <tsimonq2> does GNOME + Wayland still run single-threaded or am I living in the past? :)
[03:35] <UnivrslSuprBox> Oh is _this_ where the mwhudsonrants went?
[03:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: iraf-fitsutil (noble-proposed/universe) [2018.07.06-7 => 2018.07.06-7ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[03:37] <vpa1977> uploaded time_t fix for iraf-fitsutil (segfault)
[03:38] <mwhudson> UnivrslSuprBox: it's where it is today for sure
[03:39] <mwhudson> hnngh if you define _XOPEN_SOURCE to 500 /usr/include/db.h breaks but if you don't you don't get prototypes for wide character functions
[03:39] <mwhudson> and nvi needs both
[03:40] <liushuyu> netdiag fix: https://code.launchpad.net/~liushuyu-011/ubuntu/+source/netdiag/+git/netdiag/+merge/464074
[03:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted iraf-fitsutil [source] (noble-proposed) [2018.07.06-7ubuntu1]
[03:46] <liushuyu> netdiag fix also forwarded to Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1066694
[03:46] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Debian bug 1066694 in src:netdiag "netdiag: FTBFS: getservent.c:121:38: error: implicit declaration of function ‘atoi’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]" [Serious, Open]
[03:51] <mwhudson> liushuyu: looks ok
[03:51] <mwhudson> (not "looks good" but that's not your fault)
[03:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: netdiag (noble-proposed/universe) [1.2-1.2build2 => 1.2-1.2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[03:53] <bdmurray> Still waiting on calamares-settings-ubuntu to migrate but wandering away for a bit if somebody else wants to respin kubuntu.
[03:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted netdiag [source] (noble-proposed) [1.2-1.2ubuntu1]
[04:01] <bdmurray> It looks like it migrated so I've started a respin
[04:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: netdiag (noble-proposed/universe) [1.2-1.2build2 => 1.2-1.2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[04:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvi (noble-proposed/universe) [1.81.6-20build2 => 1.81.6-20ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[04:11] <mwhudson> well that took far too long
[04:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added oem-somerville-rattata-meta to canonical-oem-metapackages in focal
[04:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added oem-somerville-rattata-meta to canonical-oem-metapackages in jammy
[04:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvi [source] (noble-proposed) [1.81.6-20ubuntu1]
[04:16] <mwhudson> ubuntu-archive: remove p0f/armhf? it could probably be fixed but i don't know if we should care
[04:19] <liushuyu> is anyone looking at openvswitch?
[04:19] <liushuyu> openvswitch: Missing build dependencies: architecture-is-64-bit
[04:19] <liushuyu> oh well, let's skip it then
[04:30] <mwhudson> looked at pike8.0, got confused. going home.
[04:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: silo-llnl (noble-proposed/universe) [4.11-4ubuntu1 => 4.11-5] (no packageset) (sync)
[04:34] <cgmb> The ROCm stack is FTBFS on arm64 due an incompatibility between the glibc math headers and the HIP language. It's blocking all fixes to the ROCm math libraries for amd64. I'd like to ask to remove the arm64 binaries from noble so that fixes can finally migrate from noble-proposed.
[04:35] <cgmb> Should I file nine bugs to RM the arm64 binaries from the nine ROCm libraries that FTBFS? Or just one bug in the root rocm-hipamd library with the list of all binaries to RM for the rdepends?
[04:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted silo-llnl [sync] (noble-proposed) [4.11-5]
[04:36] <tsimonq2> cgmb: If you're very sure, I'd file a single bug against all nine packages and ensure the rationale is well-articulated in the bug description. :)
[04:36] <tsimonq2> + subscribe ~ubuntu-archive to the bug and paste a link here
[04:40] <cgmb> tsimonq2: Thanks! Will do!
[04:44] <bdmurray> kubuntu ftbfs and I'm running out of steam
[04:45] <tsimonq2> bdmurray: Likely a seed issue, looking
[04:46] <tsimonq2> https://git.launchpad.net/~kubuntu-dev/ubuntu-seeds/+git/kubuntu/commit/?id=b4fb3e4c9b9a81f0eb7443634efaacc83e619e82 yup
[04:46] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Commit b4fb3e4 in ~kubuntu-dev/ubuntu-seeds/+git/kubuntu "Add back fcitx. HEAD noble"
[04:49] <tsimonq2> bdmurray: I'll deliver a fix and stay up, may not have perms to do a rebuild myself
[05:03] <liushuyu> tsimonq2: You seem to be mixing up fcitx (v4) and fcitx5 (v5)
[05:04] <liushuyu> They are incompatible, and fcitx5 is currently the upstream recommended version
[05:08] <liushuyu> The fcitx5 counterparts are fcitx5-table fcitx5-frontend-all fcitx5-frontend-fbterm kde-config-fcitx5 ...
[05:09] <liushuyu> fcitx5 does not have fcitx-ui-* packages, I can see you already added fcitx5-material-color which is the correct package to replace that
[05:18] <tsimonq2> I didn't make the commit, I'm just here to fix it :)
[05:32] <vorlon> sgmoore: ^^ not really a great plan to be making changes to seeds the week of beta unless you're also coordinating image respins for them? (particularly since in this case it caused a failure of the image rebuild, rebuilding at arraybolt3's request)
[05:39] <vorlon> tsimonq2: rs2009 certainly had the option to name you as backup contact for these decisions, but he did not.  instead he named a backup who afaik has yet to give us an answer about whether there should be a respin + retest of Ubuntu Unity.
[05:39] <vorlon> mwhudson: p0f/armhf removed
[05:41] <vorlon> tsimonq2: eta on a seed fix?
[06:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-550 (jammy-proposed/restricted) [550.67-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS> => 550.67-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>] (i386-whitelist) (sync)
[06:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-550 (mantic-proposed/restricted) [550.67-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS> => 550.67-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>] (i386-whitelist) (sync)
[06:14] <sgmoore> vorlon: Gosh I am so sorry. I was told to fix it, seems I should have verified the package names after uncommenting. I also am now aware of the implications of any changes. Will fix if it hasn't been already.
[06:15] <tsimonq2> vorlon: Hi, just grabbed some coffee. rs2009 just responded on the Ubuntu Flavors channel Matrix with the following:
[06:15] <tsimonq2> "hey, just woke up +1 (was 3 am in the morning for me) sure, please go ahead! I'm around for testing as well as now (still on vacation, but I do have access to my Proxmox server)"
[06:16] <vorlon> ok
[06:16] <tsimonq2> vorlon: Looks like sgmoore may have the seed fix, following up now
[06:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-550 (jammy-proposed/restricted) [550.67-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS> => 550.67-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>] (i386-whitelist) (sync)
[06:16] <tsimonq2> sgmoore: Do you have access to respin Kubuntu, or did that request go unanswered?
[06:16] <vorlon> sgmoore, tsimonq2: thanks, I can hit the respin button as needed as soon as the seed is fixed
[06:16] <tsimonq2> Perfect :)
[06:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-550 (mantic-proposed/restricted) [550.67-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS> => 550.67-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>] (i386-whitelist) (sync)
[06:17] <sgmoore> I am lacking permissions. THanks vorlon. fixing now, will ping
[06:17] <tsimonq2> sgmoore: Let me know if you need any help
[06:17] <vorlon> ftr "kubuntu release" has access to respin
[06:18] <vorlon> so anyone in kubuntu council could add you to https://launchpad.net/~kubuntu-release/
[06:19] <vorlon> tjaalton: ^^ nvidia-graphics-drivers-550 landed back in unapproved, I've accepted them now
[06:19] <tsimonq2> vorlon: Something got lost in translation, got restructured so https://launchpad.net/~kubuntu-iso-managers is the right team
[06:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected nvidia-graphics-drivers-550 [sync] (mantic-proposed) [550.67-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>]
[06:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-550 [sync] (mantic-proposed) [550.67-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>]
[06:19] <tsimonq2> Will ask for the KC to ratify that officially, iff you think it's necessary?
[06:19] <tjaalton> vorlon: ah.. and the first copy didn't include binaries
[06:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected nvidia-graphics-drivers-550 [sync] (jammy-proposed) [550.67-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>]
[06:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvidia-graphics-drivers-550 [sync] (jammy-proposed) [550.67-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>]
[06:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: oem-somerville-rattata-meta (jammy-proposed/primary) [22.04~ubuntu1]
[06:23] <rs20094> vorlon: unfortunately, I was asleep at the time (it was 3 am for me when I was pinged about the potential respin). I've given the go-ahead now. I've also already informed Maik and Tobiyo to just go ahead and give a nod in the chat if such a situation were to arise once again and I don't reply within a few hours.
[06:23] <rs20094> (a nod on my behalf, that is)
[06:23] <sgmoore> vorlon: the seed has been corrected. Sorry again.
[06:23] <tsimonq2> sgmoore: hold on
[06:24]  * sgmoore holds
[06:24] <tsimonq2> sgmoore: fcitx5-frontend-qt6 should also be in there
[06:24] <tsimonq2> sgmoore: you probably want fcitx5-frontend-all
[06:24] <tsimonq2> (so instead of the individual fcitx5-frontend-*)
[06:24] <sgmoore> E: Unable to locate package fcitx5-frontend-all
[06:25] <tsimonq2> wat
[06:25] <sgmoore> oh wait. I am on jammy
[06:25] <sgmoore> oops
[06:25] <vorlon> tjaalton: oops :)
[06:25] <rs20094> oh, and vorlon, do lmk if there's anything else I can do about it. really sorry about the situation once again!
[06:26] <tsimonq2> sgmoore: I was gonna say :) https://packages.ubuntu.com/noble/fcitx5-frontend-all
[06:26] <vorlon> rs20094: ok, kicking off the Ubuntu Unity respin now
[06:26] <sgmoore> vorlon: sorry I need another minute for kubuntu respin
[06:29] <sgmoore> vorlon: Kubuntu seed is ready for real now. apologies.
[06:30] <vorlon> sgmoore: ok, respinning now!
[06:32] <tsimonq2> vorlon, sgmoore: thank you :)
[06:32] <sgmoore> thank you vorlon
[06:36] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, libdbd-sybase-perl care?
[06:36] <LocutusOfBorg> I can upload the new version on Debian if you want
[06:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libdbd-sybase-perl (noble-proposed/universe) [1.14-1.1build4 => 1.14-1.1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[06:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libdbd-sybase-perl [source] (noble-proposed) [1.14-1.1ubuntu1]
[06:45] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: feel free; I should probably orphan it as I no longer have any test infra for it
[06:49] <tsimonq2> sgmoore, rs2009: Ubuntu Unity and Kubuntu livefs builds both passed 🎉
[06:52] <tsimonq2> Doing my own round of testing on the Lubuntu image then marking as ready if it's good, throwing a bunch of testing at Ubuntu Unity, then throwing a bunch of testing at Kubuntu, in that order
[06:52] <tsimonq2> sgmoore: I suggest you work backwards :)
[06:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lcm [amd64] (noble-proposed) [1.5.0~repack1-0ubuntu1]
[06:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lcm [armhf] (noble-proposed) [1.5.0~repack1-0ubuntu1]
[06:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lcm [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [1.5.0~repack1-0ubuntu1]
[06:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lcm [arm64] (noble-proposed) [1.5.0~repack1-0ubuntu1]
[06:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lcm [s390x] (noble-proposed) [1.5.0~repack1-0ubuntu1]
[06:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lcm [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [1.5.0~repack1-0ubuntu1]
[06:56] <tsimonq2> vorlon: please respin Ubuntu Kylin per handsome_feng
[06:57] <handsome_feng> Thanks! Just update the seeds to fix the offline installation error.
[06:59] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, genuine question: we disabled implicit-declaration on non-armhf, but we are fixing implicit declaration on armhf, and likely they will fix every architecture, so at the end we could have left enabled everywhere? (question for noble+1, we should enable everywhere before opening, right?)
[06:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: llvm-toolchain-18 (noble-proposed/main) [1:18.1.2-1ubuntu3 => 1:18.1.3-1] (i386-whitelist) (sync)
[07:16] <juliank> mwhudson: nullboot requires a specific shim version and embeds it at build time, hence it build-depends on it. Each new shim needs an updated secboot library
[07:17] <juliank> vorlon: we know that lxc is still failing it's autopkgtests there's a follow-up patch to sponsor in the bug
[07:19] <juliank> Oh and we haven't respun cd-boot-images with the new grub yet
[07:21] <juliank> LocutusOfBorg: not everything is built on armhf and we can just remove leaf packages that ftbfs on armhf, or rather their release armhf binaries.
[07:23] <LocutusOfBorg> indeed thanks
[07:24] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, do I set qa as maintainer? I'm about to upload in Debian
[07:31] <LocutusOfBorg> uploading with no shame at all
[07:31] <LocutusOfBorg> with all the debian bug fixes
[07:48] <tsimonq2> arraybolt3: This was my mistake, I didn't expect you to know, but contextualprocess@pkgselect* needs to be ran *after* packages
[07:51] <tsimonq2> calamares-settings-ubuntu incoming to fix that mistake, not expecting that to make it in for Beta but should be in for final
[07:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: calamares-settings-ubuntu (noble-proposed/universe) [1:24.04.26 => 1:24.04.27] (lubuntu, ubuntustudio)
[07:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: falcosecurity-libs (noble-proposed/universe) [0.14.1-5.1ubuntu4 => 0.14.1-5.1ubuntu5] (no packageset)
[07:59] <tsimonq2> Marking Lubuntu as ready in a sec.
[08:00] <tsimonq2> Ubuntu Studio and Edubuntu are already marked, that makes three.
[08:00] <tsimonq2> Ubuntu Unity passed some basic smoke tests, I'll poke rs2009 one more time to see if he/team agrees, otherwise I'd mark that ready
[08:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poke-elf [source] (noble-proposed) [1.0-0ubuntu1]
[08:00] <tsimonq2> Kubuntu is next on my list...
[08:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted falcosecurity-libs [source] (noble-proposed) [0.14.1-5.1ubuntu5]
[08:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: poke-elf [amd64] (noble-proposed/none) [1.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[08:06] <tsimonq2> Kubuntu en una sesión de instalador en español es bueno :)
[08:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: golang-github-hashicorp-golang-lru-v2 (noble-proposed/universe) [2.0.7-1 => 2.0.7-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[08:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted poke-elf [amd64] (noble-proposed) [1.0-0ubuntu1]
[08:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ripoff (noble-proposed/universe) [0.8.3-0ubuntu18 => 0.8.3-0ubuntu19] (no packageset)
[08:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted golang-github-hashicorp-golang-lru-v2 [sync] (noble-proposed) [2.0.7-2]
[08:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ripoff [source] (noble-proposed) [0.8.3-0ubuntu19]
[08:12] <mkukri> what would be needed to get bpftrace approved?
[08:12] <mkukri> it is a bugfix upload, and i am calling it critical because bpftrace is currently broken in noble
[08:12] <juliank> tsimonq2: oh I think the ubuntu.sources wording updates for universe got lost a bit in time_t/xz-utils mess, I guess we can do it after the beta maybe
[08:12] <tsimonq2> juliank: ack, thanks for staying on top of that :)
[08:13] <mkukri> for reference bug is https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bpftrace/+bug/2060766
[08:13] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2060766 in bpftrace (Ubuntu) "Can't run bpftrace , ERROR: too many arguments" [Critical, In Progress]
[08:13] <tsimonq2> mkukri: "We accept payment in cash, cheque or scotch" >:P
[08:14] <tsimonq2> mkukri: In all reality, probably ping again on Monday when everyone has settled down a little from this Beta, unless someone from ubuntu-release would like to be nice :)
[08:14] <mkukri> i assume ubuntu-release wants this too given bpf tracing tools being an advertised feature of noble :)
[08:15] <tsimonq2> oh I don't doubt that for a second :)
[08:20] <zhsj> ycmd needs another no-change rebuild against libabsl t64.
[08:23] <tsimonq2> zhsj: concur, what do you think should be done about vim-youcompleteme?
[08:25] <zhsj> tsimonq2: vim-youcompleteme? it looks good currently. did i miss something?
[08:26] <tsimonq2> zhsj: Actually, in double-checking this I see the version in -proposed DTRT: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/noble/amd64/ycmd/0+20231230+git9e43034+ds-2build3
[08:27] <tsimonq2> zhsj: That being said, vim-youcompleteme has ycmd as a build dependency
[08:28] <zhsj> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/noble/arm64/ycmd/0+20231230+git9e43034+ds-2build3 (build3 happens after libabsl rebuild on some arch)
[08:28] <tsimonq2> zhsj: (if I'm wrong don't be afraid to tell me btw :) maybe you see something I don't)
[08:28] <tsimonq2> ahhhhh
[08:28] <zhsj> s/happens after/happens before/
[08:31] <tsimonq2> zhsj: NCR incoming for you
[08:31] <zhsj> tsimonq2: thanks
[08:31] <tsimonq2> happy to help :)
[08:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ripoff (noble-proposed/universe) [0.8.3-0ubuntu18 => 0.8.3-0ubuntu20] (no packageset)
[08:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ycmd (noble-proposed/universe) [0+20231230+git9e43034+ds-2build3 => 0+20231230+git9e43034+ds-2build4] (no packageset)
[08:34] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, rauc depends on ppc64l to removed casync
[08:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ripoff [source] (noble-proposed) [0.8.3-0ubuntu20]
[08:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ycmd [source] (noble-proposed) [0+20231230+git9e43034+ds-2build4]
[08:38] <LocutusOfBorg> please can you followup with the removal? it's on the list
[08:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxc (noble-proposed/universe) [1:5.0.3-2ubuntu4 => 1:5.0.3-2ubuntu5] (ubuntu-server)
[08:47] <waveform> vorlon, re: flash-kernel upload, it's fixing a failure found during ISO beta testing where flash-kernel crashed on the 2B rev 1.2 boards (the only 2B's that support arm64) because they're expecting to find the dtb for the armhf boards (the 2709 instead of the 2710)
[08:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: livecd-rootfs (noble-proposed/main) [24.04.60 => 24.04.61] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist)
[08:52] <juliank> Can we force-skiptest mysql-8.0/8.0.36-2ubuntu3 please? It fails tango/armhf which quite honest we don't care about. Or force-badtest tango/9.5.0+dfsg1-1.1build1/armhf
[08:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (noble-proposed) [24.04.61]
[08:53] <juliank> This is the one uninstallable package (group) in the lamp-server seed
[08:54] <juliank> This should then also unblock the migration of openvswtich
[08:54] <juliank> As neutron fails to install in the tests on i386
[08:54] <juliank> due to unsat mysql-8.0 dependency on libaio1
[08:56] <juliank> ubuntu-release ginggs ^^^
[08:57] <juliank> Oh also please approve lxc
[08:59] <ginggs> juliank: looking x2
[09:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lxc [source] (noble-proposed) [1:5.0.3-2ubuntu5]
[09:04] <mwhudson> juliank: well ok. how much do we care about nullboot on arm64? i assume we do want to have an amd64 nullboot binary for release
[09:04] <juliank> mwhudson: I am not sure if we have confidential VMs for arm64, gjolly?
[09:05] <jamespage> juliank: that would also unblock the glance and manila i386 failures I'm running migration-reference tests for at the moment
[09:06] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, I don't think we should look at linux-restricted-* foobar on the list, right?
[09:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted budgie-desktop-environment [source] (noble-proposed) [0.20.13]
[09:17] <schopin> Is the list in the title still current?
[09:18] <schopin> I see llvm-defaults on there, whcih migrated yesterday IIRC.
[09:18] <juliank> mwhudson: Sorry to say but reverse-depends also doesn't work for nullboot so it's hard to figure out
[09:19] <juliank> reverse-depends has like 10% or so where it just prints no output
[09:19] <tsimonq2> schopin: Probably not, although I'm not sure if that's a manual list or a machine-generated one :)
[09:20] <juliank> mwhudson: If we just want to unblock I propose copying the release pocket nullboot to -updates (so we get the arm64 binary from there) and then force migrate the amd64 rebuild while https://github.com/snapcore/secboot/pull/298 is being merged.
[09:20] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Pull 298 in snapcore/secboot "efi: add sbatlevel for shim from 24.04" [Open]
[09:20] <juliank> I think it's too late for the beta now to update boot loader components, we also would have had to respin all the cd-boot-images for shim 15.8 and new grub
[09:20] <tsimonq2> pls no :)
[09:22] <juliank> We should add "ensure all cd-boot-images-* are current" to the beta checklist fwiw
[09:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sphinxcontrib-autoprogram (noble-proposed/universe) [0.1.8-1 => 0.1.8-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[09:27] <sil2100> ...I'm surprised it's not, let me check
[09:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: node-grunt-sass (noble-proposed/universe) [3.1.0-5 => 3.1.0-5build1] (no packageset)
[09:30] <adrien> I'm looking for timing-related guidance: I want to upload a new gnutls version because it has many fixes, including security ones; there's 3.8.4 and 3.8.5 but 3.8.5 introduces a regression that won't happen on default installs but isn't unrealistic on user systems either (trivial work-around though)
[09:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted node-grunt-sass [source] (noble-proposed) [3.1.0-5build1]
[09:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sphinxcontrib-autoprogram [sync] (noble-proposed) [0.1.8-2]
[09:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: node-iconv (noble-proposed/universe) [3.0.1+~3.0.0-1build3 => 3.0.1+~3.0.0-1build4] (no packageset)
[09:31] <adrien> I can: wait for the fix for the regression in 3.8.5, or go for 3.8.5 and a revert, go for 3.8.5, stick to 3.8.4, not upload anything; and in these cases, what would be appropriate times? (now, in a week, between <IP_ADDRESS> and .1?)
[09:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: node-libpq (noble-proposed/universe) [1.8.12+~1.8.10-2 => 1.8.12+~1.8.10-2build1] (no packageset)
[09:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: unminimize (noble-proposed/primary) [0.1]
[09:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: node-modern-syslog (noble-proposed/universe) [1.2.0-4build2 => 1.2.0-4build3] (no packageset)
[09:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: node-node-sass (noble-proposed/universe) [7.0.3+git20221109.ee13eb9+dfsg-2ubuntu1 => 7.0.3+git20221109.ee13eb9+dfsg-2ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[09:34] <adrien> and also: go for one version now, and upload another one a bit later
[09:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: node-node-pty (noble-proposed/universe) [1.0.0+ds1+~6.3.0-1 => 1.0.0+ds1+~6.3.0-1build1] (no packageset)
[09:34] <juliank> sil2100: Can you go do some archive magic for nullboot? i.e. copy proposed (amd64) to updates, or copy release (arm64) to updates and proposed (amd64) to release? Need to sort out building this later. Should I just vendorize shims into another vendor tarball, maybe
[09:35] <juliank> Rather than have Build-Depends
[09:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted node-modern-syslog [source] (noble-proposed) [1.2.0-4build3]
[09:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted node-node-sass [source] (noble-proposed) [7.0.3+git20221109.ee13eb9+dfsg-2ubuntu2]
[09:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted node-node-pty [source] (noble-proposed) [1.0.0+ds1+~6.3.0-1build1]
[09:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: node-re2 (noble-proposed/universe) [1.19.2+~cs2.13.13-1build1 => 1.19.2+~cs2.13.13-1build2] (no packageset)
[09:36] <LocutusOfBorg> ginggs, llvm-toolchain-14 is waiting for tests results on arm64, but everything else is good and green. Is skiptest enough? it's blocking quite few things
[09:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted node-iconv [source] (noble-proposed) [3.0.1+~3.0.0-1build4]
[09:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted node-libpq [source] (noble-proposed) [1.8.12+~1.8.10-2build1]
[09:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: node-sqlite3 (noble-proposed/universe) [5.1.5+ds1-1 => 5.1.5+ds1-1build1] (no packageset)
[09:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: r-cran-v8 (noble-proposed/universe) [4.4.1+dfsg-1 => 4.4.1+dfsg-1build1] (no packageset)
[09:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: node-websocket (noble-proposed/universe) [1.0.34+~cs10.0.25-2 => 1.0.34+~cs10.0.25-2build1] (no packageset)
[09:37] <LocutusOfBorg> also konclude on ppc64el should be hinted or moved to slow_packages instance. autopkgtests are timing out, and I guess it's because of time
[09:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: deltarpm (noble-proposed/universe) [3.6.3+dfsg-2build4 => 3.6.3+dfsg-2build5] (no packageset)
[09:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mypy (noble-proposed/universe) [1.8.0-1 => 1.8.0-1build1] (no packageset)
[09:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: matplotlib (noble-proposed/universe) [3.6.3-1ubuntu3 => 3.6.3-1ubuntu4] (no packageset)
[09:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: node-shiny-server (noble-proposed/universe) [<IP_ADDRESS>2-2 => <IP_ADDRESS>2-2build1] (no packageset)
[09:38] <LocutusOfBorg> but probably the migration-reference/0 will fail
[09:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: numexpr (noble-proposed/universe) [2.9.0-1 => 2.9.0-1build1] (no packageset)
[09:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: scipy (noble-proposed/universe) [1.11.4-6 => 1.11.4-6build1] (kubuntu)
[09:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pyreadstat (noble-proposed/universe) [1.2.6-1 => 1.2.6-1build1] (no packageset)
[09:39] <juliank> sil2100: I suppose I could also build a nullboot in mantic and binary copy it in but that would be weird
[09:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: statsmodels (noble-proposed/universe) [0.14.1+dfsg-2 => 0.14.1+dfsg-2build1] (no packageset)
[09:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pyreadstat [source] (noble-proposed) [1.2.6-1build1]
[09:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted statsmodels [source] (noble-proposed) [0.14.1+dfsg-2build1]
[09:40] <juliank> Maybe I can do the construct additional vendor tarball thing but it's annoying because we don't get sensible built-using
[09:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted deltarpm [source] (noble-proposed) [3.6.3+dfsg-2build5]
[09:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted node-shiny-server [source] (noble-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>2-2build1]
[09:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted r-cran-v8 [source] (noble-proposed) [4.4.1+dfsg-1build1]
[09:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mypy [source] (noble-proposed) [1.8.0-1build1]
[09:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted numexpr [source] (noble-proposed) [2.9.0-1build1]
[09:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted node-re2 [source] (noble-proposed) [1.19.2+~cs2.13.13-1build2]
[09:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted node-websocket [source] (noble-proposed) [1.0.34+~cs10.0.25-2build1]
[09:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted node-sqlite3 [source] (noble-proposed) [5.1.5+ds1-1build1]
[09:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dulwich (noble-proposed/universe) [0.21.6-1build1 => 0.21.6-1build2] (no packageset)
[09:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dulwich [source] (noble-proposed) [0.21.6-1build2]
[09:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mirage (noble-proposed/universe) [0.11.2-1 => 0.11.2-1build1] (no packageset)
[09:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nml (noble-proposed/universe) [0.7.4-1 => 0.7.4-1build1] (no packageset)
[09:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openslide-python (noble-proposed/universe) [1.3.1-2 => 1.3.1-2build1] (no packageset)
[09:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ueberzug (noble-proposed/universe) [18.2.2-1 => 18.2.2-1build1] (no packageset)
[09:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pyx3 (noble-proposed/universe) [0.16-2build1 => 0.16-2build2] (no packageset)
[09:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zope.proxy (noble-proposed/universe) [5.1-3 => 5.1-3build1] (zope)
[09:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zope.security (noble-proposed/universe) [6.2-1 => 6.2-1build1] (zope)
[09:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nml [source] (noble-proposed) [0.7.4-1build1]
[09:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pyx3 [source] (noble-proposed) [0.16-2build2]
[09:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openslide-python [source] (noble-proposed) [1.3.1-2build1]
[09:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ueberzug [source] (noble-proposed) [18.2.2-1build1]
[09:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mirage [source] (noble-proposed) [0.11.2-1build1]
[09:52] <juliank> sil2100: mwhudson OK, nevermind I have a hack to vendorize shim in a vendor tarball
[09:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: omemo-dr (noble-proposed/universe) [1.0.1-2 => 1.0.1-2build1] (no packageset)
[09:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: py-radix (noble-proposed/universe) [0.10.0-4build3 => 0.10.0-4build4] (no packageset)
[09:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pocketsphinx-python (noble-proposed/universe) [1:0.1.15-3build2 => 1:0.1.15-3build3] (no packageset)
[09:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pyasn (noble-proposed/universe) [1.6.1-3build4 => 1.6.1-3build5] (no packageset)
[09:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-confluent-kafka (noble-proposed/universe) [1.7.0-4build1 => 1.7.0-4build2] (no packageset)
[09:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pycares (noble-proposed/universe) [4.4.0-1 => 4.4.0-1build1] (no packageset)
[09:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-ethtool (noble-proposed/universe) [0.14-4build3 => 0.14-4build4] (no packageset)
[09:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-unicodedata2 (noble-proposed/universe) [15.1.0+ds-1 => 15.1.0+ds-1build1] (no packageset)
[09:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rl-renderpm (noble-proposed/universe) [4.0.3-2 => 4.0.3-2build1] (no packageset)
[09:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-zstandard (noble-proposed/universe) [0.22.0-1 => 0.22.0-1build1] (no packageset)
[09:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-confluent-kafka [source] (noble-proposed) [1.7.0-4build2]
[09:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-zstandard [source] (noble-proposed) [0.22.0-1build1]
[09:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sentencepiece (noble-proposed/universe) [0.2.0-1 => 0.2.0-1build1] (no packageset)
[09:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zope.i18nmessageid (noble-proposed/universe) [6.1.0-2 => 6.1.0-2build1] (zope)
[09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-ethtool [source] (noble-proposed) [0.14-4build4]
[09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zookeeper (noble-proposed/universe) [3.9.1-1build1 => 3.9.1-1build2] (no packageset)
[09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rl-renderpm [source] (noble-proposed) [4.0.3-2build1]
[09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted omemo-dr [source] (noble-proposed) [1.0.1-2build1]
[09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted py-radix [source] (noble-proposed) [0.10.0-4build4]
[09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pycares [source] (noble-proposed) [4.4.0-1build1]
[09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pocketsphinx-python [source] (noble-proposed) [1:0.1.15-3build3]
[09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pyasn [source] (noble-proposed) [1.6.1-3build5]
[09:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: librnd (noble-proposed/universe) [4.1.1-1.1build3 => 4.2.0-1~build1] (no packageset)
[10:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted librnd [source] (noble-proposed) [4.2.0-1~build1]
[10:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zookeeper [source] (noble-proposed) [3.9.1-1build2]
[10:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sentencepiece [source] (noble-proposed) [0.2.0-1build1]
[10:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted unminimize [source] (noble-proposed) [0.1]
[10:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: unminimize [amd64] (noble-proposed/none) [0.1] (no packageset)
[10:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: unminimize [s390x] (noble-proposed/none) [0.1] (no packageset)
[10:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: unminimize [arm64] (noble-proposed/none) [0.1] (no packageset)
[10:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: unminimize [ppc64el] (noble-proposed/none) [0.1] (no packageset)
[10:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: unminimize [armhf] (noble-proposed/none) [0.1] (no packageset)
[10:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted unminimize [amd64] (noble-proposed) [0.1]
[10:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted unminimize [armhf] (noble-proposed) [0.1]
[10:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted unminimize [s390x] (noble-proposed) [0.1]
[10:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted unminimize [arm64] (noble-proposed) [0.1]
[10:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted unminimize [ppc64el] (noble-proposed) [0.1]
[10:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: unminimize [riscv64] (noble-proposed/universe) [0.1] (no packageset)
[10:29] <juliank> sil2100: mwhudson OK I just realized I can't vendorize shim in a tarball easily because of course I only have amd64 binaries installed on the system hmm, awkward
[10:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted unminimize [riscv64] (noble-proposed) [0.1]
[10:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-axolotl-curve25519 (noble-proposed/universe) [0.4.1.post2-2build10 => 0.4.1.post2-2build11] (no packageset)
[10:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-btrees (noble-proposed/universe) [4.3.1-5build2 => 4.3.1-5build3] (no packageset)
[10:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-bitarray (noble-proposed/universe) [2.9.2-1 => 2.9.2-1build1] (no packageset)
[10:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-cbor (noble-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-1.2build2 => 1.0.0-1.2build3] (kubuntu)
[10:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-crc32c (noble-proposed/universe) [2.3-1.1build2 => 2.3-1.1build3] (no packageset)
[10:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-ciso8601 (noble-proposed/universe) [2.3.1-2 => 2.3.1-2build1] (no packageset)
[10:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-crcmod (noble-proposed/universe) [1.7+dfsg-3build3 => 1.7+dfsg-3build4] (no packageset)
[10:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-cx-oracle (noble-proposed/multiverse) [8.3.0-3build3 => 8.3.0-3build4] (no packageset)
[10:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-espeak (noble-proposed/universe) [0.5-5build2 => 0.5-5build3] (no packageset)
[10:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-cytoolz (noble-proposed/universe) [0.12.2-1 => 0.12.2-1build1] (no packageset)
[10:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-fann2 (noble-proposed/universe) [1:1.2.0+ds-4build2 => 1:1.2.0+ds-4build3] (no packageset)
[10:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-gmpy2 (noble-proposed/universe) [2.1.5-3 => 2.1.5-3build1] (no packageset)
[10:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-jellyfish (noble-proposed/universe) [0.10.0-3 => 0.10.0-3build1] (no packageset)
[10:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-hiredis (noble-proposed/universe) [2.3.2-2 => 2.3.2-2build1] (no packageset)
[10:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-kyotocabinet (noble-proposed/universe) [1.23-3build3 => 1.23-3build4] (no packageset)
[10:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-cytoolz [source] (noble-proposed) [0.12.2-1build1]
[10:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-fann2 [source] (noble-proposed) [1:1.2.0+ds-4build3]
[10:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-hiredis [source] (noble-proposed) [2.3.2-2build1]
[10:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-laszip (noble-proposed/universe) [0.2.3-1 => 0.2.3-1build1] (no packageset)
[10:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-lzo (noble-proposed/universe) [1.14-1build3 => 1.14-1build4] (no packageset)
[10:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-espeak [source] (noble-proposed) [0.5-5build3]
[10:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-jellyfish [source] (noble-proposed) [0.10.0-3build1]
[10:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-gmpy2 [source] (noble-proposed) [2.1.5-3build1]
[10:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-libais (noble-proposed/universe) [0.17+git.20190917.master.e464cf8-4 => 0.17+git.20190917.master.e464cf8-4build1] (no packageset)
[10:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-bitarray [source] (noble-proposed) [2.9.2-1build1]
[10:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-ciso8601 [source] (noble-proposed) [2.3.1-2build1]
[10:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-crcmod [source] (noble-proposed) [1.7+dfsg-3build4]
[10:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-moderngl-glcontext (noble-proposed/universe) [2.5.0-1build1 => 2.5.0-1build2] (no packageset)
[10:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-btrees [source] (noble-proposed) [4.3.1-5build3]
[10:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-cx-oracle [source] (noble-proposed) [8.3.0-3build4]
[10:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-crc32c [source] (noble-proposed) [2.3-1.1build3]
[10:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-axolotl-curve25519 [source] (noble-proposed) [0.4.1.post2-2build11]
[10:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-nss (noble-proposed/universe) [1.0.1-2 => 1.0.1-2build1] (no packageset)
[10:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-noise (noble-proposed/universe) [1.2.3-4build3 => 1.2.3-4build4] (no packageset)
[10:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-oracledb (noble-proposed/universe) [1.2.1-3build2 => 1.2.1-3build3] (no packageset)
[10:47] <juliank> Also of course shipping random shim binaries in a tarball is awkward
[10:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-pairix (noble-proposed/universe) [0.3.7-7 => 0.3.7-7build1] (no packageset)
[10:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-prctl (noble-proposed/universe) [1.8.1-1build2 => 1.8.1-1build3] (no packageset)
[10:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-ptrace (noble-proposed/universe) [0.9.8-0.2 => 0.9.8-0.2build1] (no packageset)
[10:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-pyahocorasick (noble-proposed/universe) [1.4.1-1build5 => 1.4.1-1build6] (no packageset)
[10:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-py2bit (noble-proposed/universe) [0.3.1-2 => 0.3.1-2build1] (no packageset)
[10:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-pyaudio (noble-proposed/universe) [0.2.13-1build2 => 0.2.13-1build3] (no packageset)
[10:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-pycosat (noble-proposed/universe) [0.6.6+dfsg-1 => 0.6.6+dfsg-1build1] (no packageset)
[10:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-pyspoa (noble-proposed/universe) [0.0.10-1build1 => 0.0.10-1build2] (no packageset)
[10:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-rtf-tokenize (noble-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-1 => 1.0.0-1build1] (no packageset)
[10:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-rapidjson (noble-proposed/universe) [1.4-2build4 => 1.4-2build5] (no packageset)
[10:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-rtf-tokenize [source] (noble-proposed) [1.0.0-1build1]
[10:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-schedutils (noble-proposed/universe) [0.6-3build3 => 0.6-3build4] (no packageset)
[10:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-py2bit [source] (noble-proposed) [0.3.1-2build1]
[10:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-pyaudio [source] (noble-proposed) [0.2.13-1build3]
[10:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-pyspoa [source] (noble-proposed) [0.0.10-1build2]
[10:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-sdbus (noble-proposed/universe) [0.11.1-2 => 0.11.1-2build1] (no packageset)
[10:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-sysv-ipc (noble-proposed/universe) [1.1.0-2build1 => 1.1.0-2build2] (no packageset)
[10:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-pyahocorasick [source] (noble-proposed) [1.4.1-1build6]
[10:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-rapidjson [source] (noble-proposed) [1.4-2build5]
[10:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-pycosat [source] (noble-proposed) [0.6.6+dfsg-1build1]
[10:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-snappy (noble-proposed/universe) [0.5.3-1.2build2 => 0.5.3-1.2build3] (kubuntu)
[10:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-moderngl-glcontext [source] (noble-proposed) [2.5.0-1build2]
[10:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-nss [source] (noble-proposed) [1.0.1-2build1]
[10:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-pairix [source] (noble-proposed) [0.3.7-7build1]
[10:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-ptrace [source] (noble-proposed) [0.9.8-0.2build1]
[10:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-noise [source] (noble-proposed) [1.2.3-4build4]
[10:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-prctl [source] (noble-proposed) [1.8.1-1build3]
[10:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-oracledb [source] (noble-proposed) [1.2.1-3build3]
[10:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-time-machine (noble-proposed/universe) [2.13.0-2 => 2.13.0-2build1] (no packageset)
[10:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-kyotocabinet [source] (noble-proposed) [1.23-3build4]
[10:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-libais [source] (noble-proposed) [0.17+git.20190917.master.e464cf8-4build1]
[10:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-udatetime (noble-proposed/universe) [0.0.17-1build1 => 0.0.17-1build2] (no packageset)
[10:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-utmp (noble-proposed/universe) [0.9-1build8 => 0.9-1build9] (no packageset)
[10:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-laszip [source] (noble-proposed) [0.2.3-1build1]
[10:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-uinput (noble-proposed/universe) [0.11.3-1 => 0.11.3-1build1] (no packageset)
[10:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-lzo [source] (noble-proposed) [1.14-1build4]
[10:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-xxhash (noble-proposed/universe) [3.2.0-1build2 => 3.2.0-1build3] (no packageset)
[10:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-yenc (noble-proposed/universe) [0.4.0-10build4 => 0.4.0-10build5] (no packageset)
[10:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-zstd (noble-proposed/universe) [<IP_ADDRESS>-1 => <IP_ADDRESS>-1build1] (no packageset)
[10:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python3-lxc (noble-proposed/universe) [1:5.0.0-1ubuntu3 => 1:5.0.0-1ubuntu4] (no packageset)
[10:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: quantlib-swig (noble-proposed/universe) [1.33-1 => 1.33-1build1] (no packageset)
[10:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rpds-py (noble-proposed/universe) [0.12.0-3 => 0.12.0-3build1] (no packageset)
[10:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rpi.gpio (noble-proposed/universe) [0.7.1~a4-1build4 => 0.7.1~a4-1build5] (no packageset)
[10:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sabctools (noble-proposed/universe) [8.1.0-1 => 8.1.0-1build1] (no packageset)
[10:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sabctools [source] (noble-proposed) [8.1.0-1build1]
[10:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: siphashc (noble-proposed/universe) [2.1-0.1build4 => 2.1-0.1build5] (no packageset)
[10:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sip4 (noble-proposed/universe) [4.19.25+dfsg-5build2 => 4.19.25+dfsg-5build3] (kubuntu)
[10:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-yenc [source] (noble-proposed) [0.4.0-10build5]
[10:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python3-lxc [source] (noble-proposed) [1:5.0.0-1ubuntu4]
[10:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rpds-py [source] (noble-proposed) [0.12.0-3build1]
[10:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: spidev (noble-proposed/universe) [3.6-1build2 => 3.6-1build3] (no packageset)
[10:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-zstd [source] (noble-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>-1build1]
[10:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rpi.gpio [source] (noble-proposed) [0.7.1~a4-1build5]
[10:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted quantlib-swig [source] (noble-proposed) [1.33-1build1]
[10:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: swiglpk (noble-proposed/universe) [5.0.10-1 => 5.0.10-1build1] (no packageset)
[10:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-sysv-ipc [source] (noble-proposed) [1.1.0-2build2]
[10:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-udatetime [source] (noble-proposed) [0.0.17-1build2]
[10:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-utmp [source] (noble-proposed) [0.9-1build9]
[10:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-time-machine [source] (noble-proposed) [2.13.0-2build1]
[10:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tinyobjloader (noble-proposed/universe) [2.0.0~rc10+dfsg-3build1 => 2.0.0~rc10+dfsg-3build2] (no packageset)
[10:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-uinput [source] (noble-proposed) [0.11.3-1build1]
[10:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-schedutils [source] (noble-proposed) [0.6-3build4]
[10:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: tlsh (noble-proposed/universe) [3.4.4+20151206-1.4build4 => 3.4.4+20151206-1.4build5] (no packageset)
[10:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: usbrelay (noble-proposed/universe) [1.0-2.1build2 => 1.0-2.1build3] (no packageset)
[10:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-sdbus [source] (noble-proposed) [0.11.1-2build1]
[10:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ujson (noble-proposed/universe) [5.9.0-1 => 5.9.0-1build1] (no packageset)
[10:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: yara-python (noble-proposed/universe) [4.5.0-1 => 4.5.0-1build1] (no packageset)
[10:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zfec (noble-proposed/universe) [<IP_ADDRESS>-0.1 => <IP_ADDRESS>-0.1build1] (no packageset)
[10:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zodbpickle (noble-proposed/universe) [2.5-1build2 => 2.5-1build3] (no packageset)
[10:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zope.hookable (noble-proposed/universe) [6.0-1 => 6.0-1build1] (zope)
[11:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zodbpickle [source] (noble-proposed) [2.5-1build3]
[11:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ujson [source] (noble-proposed) [5.9.0-1build1]
[11:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted yara-python [source] (noble-proposed) [4.5.0-1build1]
[11:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted usbrelay [source] (noble-proposed) [1.0-2.1build3]
[11:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted zfec [source] (noble-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>-0.1build1]
[11:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted siphashc [source] (noble-proposed) [2.1-0.1build5]
[11:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted swiglpk [source] (noble-proposed) [5.0.10-1build1]
[11:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tlsh [source] (noble-proposed) [3.4.4+20151206-1.4build5]
[11:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted spidev [source] (noble-proposed) [3.6-1build3]
[11:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tinyobjloader [source] (noble-proposed) [2.0.0~rc10+dfsg-3build2]
[11:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: bitstruct (noble-proposed/universe) [8.15.1-1build2 => 8.15.1-1build3] (no packageset)
[11:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: bottleneck (noble-proposed/universe) [1.3.5+ds1-3 => 1.3.5+ds1-3build1] (no packageset)
[11:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cheetah (noble-proposed/universe) [3.3.3-1 => 3.3.3-1build1] (no packageset)
[11:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cccolutils (noble-proposed/universe) [1.5-4build2 => 1.5-4build3] (no packageset)
[11:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fastchunking (noble-proposed/universe) [0.0.3-4build2 => 0.0.3-4build3] (no packageset)
[11:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: genshi (noble-proposed/universe) [0.7.7-4build1 => 0.7.7-4build2] (no packageset)
[11:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: i2c-tools (noble-proposed/universe) [4.3-4build1 => 4.3-4build2] (no packageset)
[11:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: hnswlib (noble-proposed/universe) [0.8.0-1 => 0.8.0-1build1] (no packageset)
[11:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: isomd5sum (noble-proposed/universe) [1:1.2.3-5build5 => 1:1.2.3-5build6] (no packageset)
[11:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: jpy (noble-proposed/universe) [0.13.0-1build2 => 0.13.0-1build3] (no packageset)
[11:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libfiu (noble-proposed/universe) [1.2-1 => 1.2-1build1] (no packageset)
[11:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: jsonnet (noble-proposed/universe) [0.20.0+ds-1build1 => 0.20.0+ds-1build2] (no packageset)
[11:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libkdtree++ (noble-proposed/universe) [0.7.1+git20101123-6build4 => 0.7.1+git20101123-6build5] (no packageset)
[11:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libpillowfight (noble-proposed/universe) [0.3.0-5build1 => 0.3.0-5build2] (no packageset)
[11:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lz4tools (noble-proposed/universe) [<IP_ADDRESS>-5build4 => <IP_ADDRESS>-5build5] (no packageset)
[11:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lru-dict (noble-proposed/universe) [1.3.0-1 => 1.3.0-1build1] (no packageset)
[11:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lru-dict [source] (noble-proposed) [1.3.0-1build1]
[11:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mwparserfromhell (noble-proposed/universe) [0.6.5-2 => 0.6.5-2build1] (no packageset)
[11:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pacparser (noble-proposed/universe) [1.4.3-1 => 1.4.3-1build1] (no packageset)
[11:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lz4tools [source] (noble-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>-5build5]
[11:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: patiencediff (noble-proposed/universe) [0.2.13-1build1 => 0.2.13-1build2] (no packageset)
[11:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: orocos-kdl (noble-proposed/universe) [1.5.1-4 => 1.5.1-4build1] (no packageset)
[11:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted jsonnet [source] (noble-proposed) [0.20.0+ds-1build2]
[11:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libkdtree++ [source] (noble-proposed) [0.7.1+git20101123-6build5]
[11:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libfiu [source] (noble-proposed) [1.2-1build1]
[11:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libpillowfight [source] (noble-proposed) [0.3.0-5build2]
[11:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cheetah [source] (noble-proposed) [3.3.3-1build1]
[11:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted genshi [source] (noble-proposed) [0.7.7-4build2]
[11:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted i2c-tools [source] (noble-proposed) [4.3-4build2]
[11:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted jpy [source] (noble-proposed) [0.13.0-1build3]
[11:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: portio (noble-proposed/universe) [0.5-5build3 => 0.5-5build4] (no packageset)
[11:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: py-lz4framed (noble-proposed/universe) [0.14.0-1build5 => 0.14.0-1build6] (no packageset)
[11:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fastchunking [source] (noble-proposed) [0.0.3-4build3]
[11:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted isomd5sum [source] (noble-proposed) [1:1.2.3-5build6]
[11:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: py-lmdb (noble-proposed/universe) [1.4.1-2build1 => 1.4.1-2build2] (no packageset)
[11:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted hnswlib [source] (noble-proposed) [0.8.0-1build1]
[11:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: phat (noble-proposed/universe) [1.6-2build5 => 1.6-2build6] (no packageset)
[11:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted bitstruct [source] (noble-proposed) [8.15.1-1build3]
[11:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cccolutils [source] (noble-proposed) [1.5-4build3]
[11:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted bottleneck [source] (noble-proposed) [1.3.5+ds1-3build1]
[11:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pyao (noble-proposed/universe) [0.82+ds1-7build1 => 0.82+ds1-7build2] (no packageset)
[11:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pyephem (noble-proposed/universe) [4.1.5-1build1 => 4.1.5-1build2] (no packageset)
[11:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pybluez (noble-proposed/universe) [0.23-5.1build2 => 0.23-5.1build3] (no packageset)
[11:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pyethash (noble-proposed/universe) [0.1.27-3build1 => 0.1.27-3build2] (no packageset)
[11:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pygalmesh (noble-proposed/universe) [0.10.6-2 => 0.10.6-2build1] (no packageset)
[11:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pyfribidi (noble-proposed/universe) [0.12.0+repack-10build1 => 0.12.0+repack-10build2] (no packageset)
[11:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pyhunspell (noble-proposed/universe) [0.5.5-2build9 => 0.5.5-2build10] (no packageset)
[11:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pykcs11 (noble-proposed/universe) [1.5.14-1 => 1.5.14-1build1] (no packageset)
[11:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pylzss (noble-proposed/universe) [0.3-1build3 => 0.3-1build4] (no packageset)
[11:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pykerberos (noble-proposed/universe) [1.1.14-3.1build8 => 1.1.14-3.1build9] (no packageset)
[11:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pymad (noble-proposed/universe) [0.11.3-1build1 => 0.11.3-1build2] (no packageset)
[11:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pykerberos [source] (noble-proposed) [1.1.14-3.1build9]
[11:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pymad [source] (noble-proposed) [0.11.3-1build2]
[11:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pynauty (noble-proposed/universe) [2.8.6+ds-2build1 => 2.8.6+ds-2build2] (no packageset)
[11:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pyopencl (noble-proposed/universe) [2023.1.3-1build1 => 2023.1.3-1build2] (no packageset)
[11:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pylzss [source] (noble-proposed) [0.3-1build4]
[11:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pyodbc (noble-proposed/universe) [5.1.0-1 => 5.1.0-1build1] (no packageset)
[11:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pymilter (noble-proposed/universe) [1.0.5-1build4 => 1.0.5-1build5] (no packageset)
[11:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pyfribidi [source] (noble-proposed) [0.12.0+repack-10build2]
[11:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pyhunspell [source] (noble-proposed) [0.5.5-2build10]
[11:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pygalmesh [source] (noble-proposed) [0.10.6-2build1]
[11:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pykcs11 [source] (noble-proposed) [1.5.14-1build1]
[11:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted py-lmdb [source] (noble-proposed) [1.4.1-2build2]
[11:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pyao [source] (noble-proposed) [0.82+ds1-7build2]
[11:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pyephem [source] (noble-proposed) [4.1.5-1build2]
[11:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pyqt6-sip (noble-proposed/universe) [13.6.0-1build1 => 13.6.0-1build2] (no packageset)
[11:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pysendfile (noble-proposed/universe) [2.0.1-4build4 => 2.0.1-4build5] (no packageset)
[11:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted py-lz4framed [source] (noble-proposed) [0.14.0-1build6]
[11:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pyethash [source] (noble-proposed) [0.1.27-3build2]
[11:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pybluez [source] (noble-proposed) [0.23-5.1build3]
[11:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pyscard (noble-proposed/universe) [2.0.7-2build1 => 2.0.7-2build2] (no packageset)
[11:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mwparserfromhell [source] (noble-proposed) [0.6.5-2build1]
[11:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pacparser [source] (noble-proposed) [1.4.3-1build1]
[11:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted phat [source] (noble-proposed) [1.6-2build6]
[11:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted orocos-kdl [source] (noble-proposed) [1.5.1-4build1]
[11:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted portio [source] (noble-proposed) [0.5-5build4]
[11:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted patiencediff [source] (noble-proposed) [0.2.13-1build2]
[11:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pysubnettree (noble-proposed/universe) [0.36-1build2 => 0.36-1build3] (no packageset)
[11:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-apsw (noble-proposed/universe) [<IP_ADDRESS>-1build1 => <IP_ADDRESS>-1build2] (ubuntustudio)
[11:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pyscard [source] (noble-proposed) [2.0.7-2build2]
[11:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pysubnettree [source] (noble-proposed) [0.36-1build3]
[11:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pysendfile [source] (noble-proposed) [2.0.1-4build5]
[11:26] <jbicha> arraybolt3: Kubuntu should be installing the firefox apt package.  I guess the package description should be updated to make it more clear
[11:28] <tsimonq2> jbicha: 100% agree
[11:28] <tsimonq2> worth noting...
[11:28] <tsimonq2> firefox (from firefox) is seeded in: edubuntu: daily-live, daily-preinstalled ubuntu-unity: daily-live ubuntu: daily-live, daily-preinstalled ubuntucinnamon: daily-live ubuntukylin: daily-live xubuntu: daily-live
[11:28] <tsimonq2> which means we're missing 5 flavors
[11:33] <jbicha> tsimonq2: there was a thread about chromium (but same idea applies to Firefox) started by the then-maintainer of chromium: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2022-February/thread.html
[11:38] <tsimonq2> jbicha: thanks!
[11:39] <tsimonq2> sil2100, bdmurray: Did we have a specific time in mind for Beta? Want to know if I should grab more coffee. :P
[11:40] <fnordahl> ahasenack: I'd like to request ovn_22.03.7-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS> to be rejected from the Jammy Unapproved queue.  It turns out there was an architecture specific failure in the added test that I was unable to catch prior to proposing it, which I need to fix before we can proceed ref bug 2060941
[11:40] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2060941 in ovn (Ubuntu) "[ovn 22.03][arm64] ovn -- CoPP test fails" [Undecided, New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2060941
[11:41] <fnordahl> oh, he's not in here yet :) I'll ping later then unless anyone else want to help out
[11:41] <tsimonq2> ubuntu-sru: ^^^^^
[11:41] <tsimonq2> fnordahl: I hope that helps re: eyes :)
[11:41] <fnordahl> ta tsimonq2
[11:57] <mirespace> juliank, LocotusOfBorg: regarding the implicit-declaration, is still ok going through the paste ubuntu list and fix ftbfs armfh  if possible, or they are going to be pruned by arch?
[11:58] <LocutusOfBorg> mirespace, if you type my nick correctly, it becomes easier for me to see the highlight :)
[11:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: camv-rnd (noble-proposed/universe) [1.1.4-1 => 1.1.4-1build1] (no packageset)
[11:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sch-rnd (noble-proposed/universe) [1.0.4-2 => 1.0.4-2build1] (no packageset)
[11:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pcb-rnd (noble-proposed/universe) [3.1.3-1 => 3.1.3-1build1] (no packageset)
[11:59] <LocutusOfBorg> mirespace, I guess it is still ok!
[11:59] <LocutusOfBorg> all the packages without a review are armhf ftbfs
[11:59] <mirespace> hehe... sorry! LocutusOfBorg!
[11:59] <LocutusOfBorg> I went to the whole list
[11:59] <LocutusOfBorg> no problem mirespace :) I'm just worried to miss some pings
[11:59] <mirespace> Ok ...then, working on stellarsolver
[11:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-builder (noble-proposed/universe) [46.0-1build1 => 46.1-1] (desktop-extra) (sync)
[12:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sch-rnd [source] (noble-proposed) [1.0.4-2build1]
[12:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: 7zip (noble-proposed/universe) [23.01+dfsg-8 => 23.01+dfsg-11] (no packageset) (sync)
[12:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debian-reference (noble-proposed/universe) [2.120 => 2.122] (no packageset) (sync)
[12:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zeroc-ice (noble-proposed/universe) [3.7.10-2.1build1 => 3.7.10-2.2] (cli-mono) (sync)
[12:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted camv-rnd [source] (noble-proposed) [1.1.4-1build1]
[12:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pcb-rnd [source] (noble-proposed) [3.1.3-1build1]
[12:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted debian-reference [sync] (noble-proposed) [2.122]
[12:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: falcosecurity-libs (noble-proposed/universe) [0.14.1-5.1ubuntu5 => 0.15.1-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[12:07] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, I'm just reading that you might not have intended to orphan libdbd-sybase-perl... in that case I can restore you as maintainer and reupload, please let me know
[12:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted falcosecurity-libs [source] (noble-proposed) [0.15.1-1ubuntu1]
[12:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: genht (noble-proposed/universe) [1.1.2-2build1 => 1.1.3-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[12:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted genht [sync] (noble-proposed) [1.1.3-1]
[12:25] <mkukri> is fuse broken on armhf? at least pyfuse3 seems broken not sure if it is bug in it, or fuse itself
[12:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libdbd-sybase-perl (noble-proposed/universe) [1.14-1.1ubuntu1 => 1.24-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[12:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libdbd-sybase-perl [sync] (noble-proposed) [1.24-1]
[12:44] <mkukri> ah nah, it is a pyfuse3 example and it used in a tests. it puts time_t into sqlite3, and that doest seem to end well: 'OverflowError: Python int too large to convert to SQLite INTEGER'
[12:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ros2-colcon-core (noble-proposed/universe) [0.15.2-1 => 0.15.2-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[12:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ros2-colcon-core [source] (noble-proposed) [0.15.2-1ubuntu1]
[13:02] <mkukri> or maybe time_t as known by cython is incorrect now? https://github.com/cython/cython/blob/master/Cython/Includes/posix/types.pxd
[13:02] <mkukri> it seems like the struct stat layout known to pyfuse3 is wrong and it results in crazy timestamps that wont fit in 64-bit ints in 64-bit form
[13:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected mysql-shell [source] (noble-proposed) [8.0.36+dfsg-0ubuntu1]
[13:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected netdiag [source] (noble-proposed) [1.2-1.2ubuntu1]
[13:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libdigidoc (noble-proposed/universe) [3.10.5-4.1ubuntu1 => 3.10.5-4.1ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[13:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libdigidoc [source] (noble-proposed) [3.10.5-4.1ubuntu2]
[13:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: camv-rnd (noble-proposed/universe) [1.1.4-1build1 => 1.1.4-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[13:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted camv-rnd [source] (noble-proposed) [1.1.4-1ubuntu1]
[14:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pcb-rnd (noble-proposed/universe) [3.1.3-1build1 => 3.1.4-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[14:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: sch-rnd (noble-proposed/universe) [1.0.4-2build1 => 1.0.5-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[14:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pcb-rnd [source] (noble-proposed) [3.1.4-1ubuntu1]
[14:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted sch-rnd [source] (noble-proposed) [1.0.5-1ubuntu1]
[14:31] <arraybolt3> jbicha: makes sense, I agree with tsimonq2 about updating the description since it makes it sound like the firefox apt package is intended to be a thing of the past.
[14:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: mysql-shell (noble-proposed/primary) [8.0.36+dfsg-0ubuntu1]
[15:03] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: we aren't committed to fixing all packages that ftbfs with implicit-declaration on armhf. Some armhf binaries just get removed instead
[15:04] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: furthermore, even for packages where we do decide to fix armhf, the timing made it important to not have fixing ftbfs on all archs in the critical path
[15:06] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: I think setting QA as the maintainer would be my responsibility, I haven't orphaned it *yet*, just said I think I probably should
[15:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted software-properties [source] (noble-proposed) [0.99.47]
[15:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-dateutil [source] (noble-proposed) [2.8.2-3ubuntu1]
[15:16] <blackboxsw> release team: there is a upload of cloud-init-  24.1.3-0ubuntu3 from a 2 days ago with a bug fix for noble which results in tcp session leaks which results in "too many  file open" errors on certain platforms where instance metadta URLs return repeated 404s during pre-provisioning.  Do we know whether this bug and upload will get into the beta images?
[15:17] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: rauc/ppc64el> done
[15:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted util-linux [source] (noble-proposed) [2.39.3-9ubuntu6]
[15:17] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, would you like me to reupload with you as maintainer? I really read wrong your sentence
[15:17] <LocutusOfBorg> and I'm sorry for that
[15:18] <LocutusOfBorg> acl2 finished building
[15:18] <schopin> Only took, what, a week?
[15:19] <LocutusOfBorg> schopin, a restart
[15:19] <ginggs> schopin: 21 hours this time
[15:19] <schopin> Heh, that works too :)
[15:20] <philroche> blackboxsw: cloud-init 24.1.3-0ubuntu3 is still in -proposed
[15:22] <blackboxsw> philroche: yes I'm wondering whether that -proposed upload will be blocked from this release and beta image generation, as it seems to be missing the cut-line for beta and blocked https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html and so I'm reaching out to release-team to see if that can be included
[15:22] <philroche> ack
[15:26] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: skipping linux-restricted in the list, correct, kernel team will (need to) handle those
[15:26] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: yeah please reupload to un-orphan for now :)
[15:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-control-center [source] (noble-proposed) [1:46.0.1-1ubuntu3]
[15:26] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, did you see my changes? I changed to QA to have possibility to qa upload
[15:26] <LocutusOfBorg> https://tracker.debian.org/news/1518354/accepted-libdbd-sybase-perl-124-1-source-into-unstable/
[15:39] <liushuyu> vorlon: can we have an updated list of https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/wffN9wV894/? It seems like some packages might still need attention
[15:39] <tjaalton> I still have 780 packages that can't be upgaded on my system(s), is there a procedure to weed the blocking ones through?
[15:40] <vorlon> liushuyu: ^ the pad has notes and is probably the best thing to work from now rather than regenerating a list
[15:40] <vorlon> (which would lose the notes)
[15:40] <tjaalton> oh, needs 'apt full-upgrade ubuntu-desktop'
[15:40] <liushuyu> vorlon: okay
[15:41] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: I would like it moved back off of QA to me but also am not likely to do the upload myself to revert this, fwiw
[15:41] <liushuyu> so packages without any annontations are free games?
[15:41] <vorlon> liushuyu: yes
[15:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: crmsh (noble-proposed/universe) [4.6.0-1ubuntu1 => 4.6.0-1ubuntu2] (ubuntu-server)
[15:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted hfsutils [source] (noble-proposed) [3.2.6-15ubuntu1]
[15:51] <jbicha> blackboxsw: I'm not release-team but cloud-init is now included in all the Ubuntu desktop flavor ISOs except for the Calamares flavors so it's going to be a bit disruptive to let it in before beta
[15:52] <philroche> blackboxsw cloud images don't really follow Beta so once it does land in -release then we can rebuild all the cloud images
[15:53] <arighi> dear relase-team, heads up on some new 6.8 kernels, derived from generic 6.8.0-24.24: these are the kernels that we would like to have in release, they are aligned with all the upstream stable fixes and the latest AppArmor, also expect to see a bunch of changes in the derivatives kernels (that have been re-aligned with the latest generic)
[15:54] <arighi> let me know if you have any doubt, question, concern, thanks!
[15:54] <blackboxsw> jbicha: ack, thank you. philroche excellent on CPC-side confirmation. this specifically would be of interest in cloud images
[15:54] <Eickmeyer> arighi: Does this include lowlatency which is at -20 in proposed?
[15:55] <arighi> Eickmeyer, yes, there should be a 6.8.0-24.24.1 lowlatency, aligned with generic 6.8.0-24.24
[15:56] <Eickmeyer> arighi: Excellent. I noticed that -20 had only recently been uploaded and nothing ever got aligned in -release, but I forgot to know where to look for why.
[15:56] <Eickmeyer> Probably the transition, is what I'm chalking it up to.
[15:57] <arighi> Eickmeyer, according to LP: #2060829 it's currently in review, waiting to be promoted to proposed
[15:57] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2060829 in Kernel SRU Workflow sru-review "noble/linux-lowlatency: 6.8.0-24.24.1 -proposed tracker" [Medium, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2060829
[15:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted casper [source] (noble-proposed) [1.497]
[15:57] <Eickmeyer> arighi: Ah, thanks.
[16:00] <cpaelzer> just seen the "openvswitch - Missing build dependencies: architecture-is-64-bit" still being in the tihngs to resolve list. That cahnge was intentional and 32bit is dropped as not supported. Is there something we still need to remove for that or has that happened since then?
[16:05] <ginggs> cpaelzer: not sure why that appeared in the 'by team' report, but looking at update_excuses, it should migrate once the beta freeze block is lifted, so nothing to do
[16:05] <cpaelzer> thanks ginggs
[16:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloudkitty (noble-proposed/universe) [20.0.0-1ubuntu1 => 20.0.0-1ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[16:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloudkitty [source] (noble-proposed) [20.0.0-1ubuntu2]
[16:27] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, already done!
[16:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pam (noble-proposed/main) [1.5.3-5ubuntu4 => 1.5.3-5ubuntu5] (core, i386-whitelist)
[16:30] <mirespace> MP for stellarsolver https://code.launchpad.net/~mirespace/ubuntu/+source/stellarsolver/+git/stellarsolver/+merge/464130 (sorry, too many interrupts in between)
[16:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: moonshot-ui (noble-proposed/universe) [1.1.0+libsecret~2build3 => 1.1.0+libsecret~2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[16:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted moonshot-ui [source] (noble-proposed) [1.1.0+libsecret~2ubuntu1]
[17:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: mpb (noble-proposed/universe) [1.11.1-5build2 => 1.11.1-5ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[17:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted mpb [source] (noble-proposed) [1.11.1-5ubuntu1]
[17:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qemu [source] (jammy-proposed) [1:6.2+dfsg-2ubuntu6.19]
[17:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: macutils (focal-proposed/universe) [2.0b3-16build1 => 2.0b3-16ubuntu0.1] (no packageset)
[17:47] <bdmurray> Could we move the conversation regarding random package fixes to ubuntu-devel and leave this for archive admin  / release coordination?
[17:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: falcosecurity-libs (noble-proposed/universe) [0.15.1-1ubuntu1 => 0.15.1-1ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[17:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted falcosecurity-libs [source] (noble-proposed) [0.15.1-1ubuntu2]
[17:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: numptyphysics (focal-proposed/universe) [0.2+svn157-0.4build1 => 0.2+svn157-0.4ubuntu0.1] (no packageset)
[18:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rocrand (noble-proposed/universe) [5.7.1-1 => 5.7.1-4] (no packageset) (sync)
[18:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted rocrand [sync] (noble-proposed) [5.7.1-4]
[18:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ncl (noble-proposed/universe) [6.6.2.dfsg.1-5 => 6.6.2.dfsg.1-6] (no packageset) (sync)
[18:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvi (noble-proposed/universe) [1.81.6-20ubuntu1 => 1.81.6-21] (no packageset) (sync)
[18:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ncl [sync] (noble-proposed) [6.6.2.dfsg.1-6]
[18:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nvi [sync] (noble-proposed) [1.81.6-21]
[18:17] <philroche> blackboxsw: cloud-init  24.1.3-0ubuntu3 will only land after Beta.
[18:20] <blackboxsw> ok thanks philroche that is fine, just wanted to confirm whether the ship has sailed and it looks per-above that we are beyond that deadline.  If that's the case then, I think we'll need to create anLP bug as release critical then for this issue for consideration in Noble release.
[18:21] <philroche> +1
[18:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected gdcm [sync] (noble-proposed) [3.0.22-3]
[18:32] <bdmurray> arighi: What could happen if the new kernel was not "aligned with" the latest AppArmor?
[18:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nfs-utils (focal-proposed/main) [1:1.3.4-2.5ubuntu3.6 => 1:1.3.4-2.5ubuntu3.7] (core)
[18:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: runc (noble-proposed/universe) [1.1.12+ds1-1ubuntu1 => 1.1.12+ds1-2ubuntu1] (ubuntu-server)
[19:03] <juliank> The following packages have been kept back:
[19:03] <juliank>   python3-lib2to3
[19:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-text-editor (noble-proposed/main) [46.0-1build1 => 46.1-1] (ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[19:03] <juliank> doko: ^ python3-lib2to3 is being kept back rather than removing python3-distutils, I'll go investigate, I think we need a Breaks: python3-distutils somewhere
[19:03] <juliank> To make apt trigger the removal
[19:07] <juliank> doko: Adding a Breaks to python3-lib2to3 did not help, I guess python3 3.12 should Breaks: python3-distutils
[19:07] <juliank> yes this is much better
[19:09] <juliank> I admit this is awkward but the solver seeds python3-distutils is broken because it Depends on the old python3-libutils and then tries to essentially wait for a new python3-distutils, so we need to force its removal some way
[19:09] <juliank> s/libutils/lib2to3/
[19:10] <juliank> With a Conflicts or Breaks in python3, it instead sees python3 as Broken and fixes it by removing python3-distutils as we want
[19:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lubuntu-default-settings (noble-proposed/universe) [24.04.6 => 24.04.7] (lubuntu)
[19:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: wmstickynotes (noble-proposed/universe) [0.7-4 => 0.7-5] (no packageset) (sync)
[19:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openqa (noble-proposed/universe) [4.6.1700240294.34068e38e-1.1 => 4.6.1700240294.34068e38e-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[19:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted openqa [sync] (noble-proposed) [4.6.1700240294.34068e38e-2]
[19:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wmstickynotes [sync] (noble-proposed) [0.7-5]
[19:21] <liushuyu> taking pike8.0
[19:24] <jbicha> liushuyu: could you post your claimed packages to #ubuntu-devel so that this channel is reserved for release coordination now?
[19:26] <juliank> tjaalton: I want to note to please run -o Dir::Log::Solver=<file path> and send the file it dumps to me whenever you see held back packages or more importantly lots of removals
[19:28] <liushuyu> jbicha: okay
[19:29] <juliank> OK I removed "packages with removed amd64 binaries that need resolving: https://pad.riseup.net/p/migrate-list-amd64" from the topic here, but someone needs to add it to #ubuntu-devel, I only have release op
[19:36] <bdmurray> thank you
[19:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted indicator-power [source] (noble-proposed) [12.10.6+17.10.20170829.1-0ubuntu9]
[19:38] <tsimonq2> ubuntu-release: What's the Beta holdup at this point?
[19:40] <bdmurray> tsimonq2: button pushing
[19:40] <vorlon> tsimonq2: I believe publication is in process; there are some images that haven't been marked ready yet on https://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/452/builds (ubuntu unity?)
[19:40] <vorlon> (plus raspi desktop and various server things, which I'm chasing internally for signoff)
[19:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: thunderbird (noble-proposed/main) [1:115.8.1+build1+snap3 => 2:1snap1-0ubuntu1] (mozilla, ubuntu-desktop)
[19:42] <tsimonq2> vorlon: I personally threw Ubuntu Unity through a battery of tests last night, it's good.
[19:43] <vorlon> tsimonq2: but you're not authorized to sign off that it's good...
[19:43] <vorlon> yes there are test results but marking it ready is intended as a separate sign-off check from the flavor leads
[19:45] <tsimonq2> vorlon: I know that's how it was intended, but in past releases we didn't wait for a single button push if the lead raised no objections and the testing is clearly done?
[19:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-budgie-meta (noble-proposed/universe) [0.125 => 0.126] (personal-fossfreedom, ubuntu-budgie)
[19:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: provd (noble-proposed/universe) [0.1.1 => 0.1.2] (no packageset)
[19:48] <vorlon> tsimonq2: uh we absolutely have chased flavor leads for sign-offs
[19:49] <vorlon> rs2009, Maik: ^
[19:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted provd [source] (noble-proposed) [0.1.2]
[19:51] <sil2100> uhh
[19:51] <bdmurray> Just because something might have been done in the past or isn't a regression doesn't make it okay.
[19:51] <sil2100> ubuntu-base hiccup, hmm, checking
[19:52] <sil2100> wtf
[19:52] <arraybolt3> bdmurray, vorlon: In a previous Flavor Sync Meeting about ay ear or two ago, it was clarified in no uncertain terms that if a flavor was obviously ready but the lead wasn't around for some reason, the Release Team would mark it as "Ready" for them. This was specifically in the context of Final Release, I'm not sure if it applied to Beta as well or not. Nevertheless this was something that I
[19:52] <arraybolt3> believe jbicha told the flavors directly, so I'm a bit confused.
[19:53] <tsimonq2> And this has been the case for a few releases now.
[19:53] <bdmurray> jbicha is not a release team member
[19:53] <sil2100> bdmurray, vorlon: I'm seeing isotracker strangeness. The isotracker says that 20240411 is the version for all ubuntu-base tarballs, but this version was never built
[19:54] <tsimonq2> bdmurray: So how is anyone outside of the Release Team expected to keep track of what rules are enforced this time?
[19:54] <sil2100> bdmurray, vorlon: I don't even see cd-build-log logs of 20240411
[19:54] <arraybolt3> well then the docs *need* some **help** because this is a critical shared assumption that I believe the leads of all flavors share.
[19:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gtk4 (noble-proposed/main) [4.14.1+ds-0ubuntu2 => 4.14.2+ds-1ubuntu1] (desktop-core, i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop)
[19:55] <tsimonq2> arraybolt3: +1
[19:55] <sil2100> bdmurray, vorlon: I'll modify the isotracker build ids for the ubuntu-base tarballs, but it does make me feel a bit 'concerned'
[19:57] <arraybolt3> bdmurray: (re jbicha is not a release team member) The flavors have to get their info from somewhere. If someone who appears to be qualified to give advice gives inaccurate advice, it is not our fault for following it, and we need someone else to tell us how things actually work in time for us to understand it. Telling us hours or minutes before Beta Release that we need all flavor leads
[19:57] <arraybolt3> present when we've been operating for the last couple of *years* assuming it's not critical, is not going to work for obvious reasons. Perhaps I'm simply misunderstanding the requirements for the release to be marked as ready and the RT will mark it after long enough?
[20:00] <tsimonq2> It's *usually* been pinging days beforehand. Remember, in past releases we expected Beta to be fairly accurate on Monday. At that point, the person driving the release says "ok, we need to release on time, these flavors are obviously ready, they haven't raised objections, let's Just Do It."
[20:01] <bdmurray> The release team is not going to make a call about whether or not a product which is not ours is ready to be released to the world.
[20:01] <arraybolt3> Fair enough. Is there a way we can work closer with the Release Team so we can be up-to-speed on these changes as they happen?
[20:02] <arraybolt3> The problem I'm seeing is, this cycle it seems like the RT has made a *lot* of changes, all of which have good merit and which I even agree with, but which have happened without much notification to the flavors and which have resulted in many "whoa what" moments in critical times.
[20:02] <tsimonq2> ^^^
[20:03] <arraybolt3> Obviously we're all just trying to get a good product out the door and maintained, we just need to all know what that involved so we have shared understanding. Right now the shared understanding of everyone except the RT was "they'll mark it as ready if the flavor lead isn't around, we're good". Now we're learning the flavor leads or other contacts have to be around for it to work at all.
[20:03] <arraybolt3> If we had learned this a week ago, this would have been great. This is less-than-ideal.
[20:04] <tsimonq2> It's day of, about 8 hours past when all flavors are marked as ready, too.
[20:04] <tsimonq2> *most
[20:05] <arraybolt3> at any rate I've pinged Maik elsewhere so we can get this unravelled the right way.
[20:07] <Eickmeyer> All goes back to a decade-old lack of external documentation issue that I hope gets resolved during the next cycle.
[20:08] <tsimonq2> Still not seeing Lubuntu as published, I marked as ready really early this morning. If the blocker is a flavor lead marking as ready, why aren't Lubuntu's images published?
[20:09] <Eickmeyer> I marked Ubuntu Studio and Edubuntu as ready very, very early this morning, same question.
[20:10] <tsimonq2> And furthermore, why did all of our public messaging for Beta go out early? As Ubuntu. Seems like internally they couldn't agree on a time, or someone made a false assumption.
[20:10] <tsimonq2> I'm willing to bet it was the former.
[20:11] <sil2100> I think we all need to take it easy and calm down, it's a very stressful and intense release - I think it's getting to all of us
[20:11] <arraybolt3> ^ +1
[20:11] <sil2100> I'm in the middle of publishing images one by one and uh, even this blows up in my face periodically
[20:12] <sil2100> What the heck is going on
[20:13] <sil2100> For sure we need to take a step back. I think it's good practice to try and get an official sign-off from the lead of a given flavor before we go live
[20:14] <tsimonq2> I've been trying for a few hours now.
[20:14] <sil2100> Darn
[20:14] <sil2100> I think the whole Beta move also busted everyone's calendars
[20:15] <jbicha> I do not recall saying that the Ubuntu Release team would release without flavors marking as ready. If I did say that, I apologize
[20:16] <sil2100> To be fair, we were doing this in the past, but in general I think this is better practice. Especially for a release that's *this* bumpy
[20:17] <sil2100> I was actually worried that our Beta images will be in much worse state
[20:17] <arraybolt3> jbicha: I believe it was in the second Flavor Sync meeting, itswirlz had specifically asked about the "punishment" for releasing a day late, and was informed that there was no such thing as releasing late - it was either release on time or don't release at all. However, I believe you (if it wasn't you it was someone else) clarified that if he simply wasn't around to do the release because
[20:18] <arraybolt3> he was at school or something, it would be marked as ready for him.
[20:18] <rs2009> marked unity as ready just now (thank you for the ping tsimonq2!); it's nearly 2 am here and I just happened to be awake (we might have ended up in the same boat as yesterday otherwise)
[20:18] <arraybolt3> thank you!!! \o/
[20:18] <Eickmeyer> \o/
[20:18] <sil2100> rs2009: \o/
[20:18] <tsimonq2> Thanks!
[20:19] <sil2100> Perfect timing, I was about to get to ubuntu unity in the publishing chain...
[20:19] <Eickmeyer> Now we're just waiting on all of the products.
[20:19] <arraybolt3> (and this is exactly why we need to know about this sort of thing in advance - sometimes it's 2am where the flavor lead is when we're finding out he needs to be present :P)
[20:19] <tsimonq2> ^^^
[20:19] <Eickmeyer> ^^^^
[20:19] <sil2100> I think we might need some delegation process in such cases for sure
[20:19] <jbicha> arraybolt3: ok, the context sounds reasonable especially since this has happened in the past. Hard for me to remember details from a year or more ago. Explicit approval from flavors is nicer though for everyone
[20:20] <Eickmeyer> AIUI Maik is in The Netherlands, so the fact that he's not readily available is troubling considering he's been pinged here, there, and everywhere.
[20:20] <arraybolt3> definitely agreed.
[20:20] <arraybolt3> (re jbicha)
[20:20] <sil2100> Either internally in the given flavor, or maybe just making it explicit to the release team that flavor X lead can also make the call for flavor Y
[20:20] <arraybolt3> Eickmeyer: fwiw Rudra added a third point of contact as per his message in the Ubuntu Flavors matrix room:
[20:21] <arraybolt3> meh, I'm sure you saw that already
[20:21] <Eickmeyer> arraybolt3: Who's the third point of contact? I did not see it.
[20:21] <arraybolt3> "I've also invited Maik and Tobiyo (fuseteam) from the Ubuntu Unity team to this channel to give a go-ahead in the event that I were to go missing once again."
[20:21] <arraybolt3> I can reach Tobiyo in the Ubuntu Unity matrix room.
[20:21] <sil2100> Thank you!
[20:21] <Eickmeyer> arraybolt3: Those people **must be in this room**
[20:22] <sil2100> Yeah, I'm old and still didn't learn matrix
[20:22] <arraybolt3> mmm, now I'm learning new things that even you know :P
[20:22] <sil2100> (but I will)
[20:22] <arraybolt3> IRC is better in a lot of ways :P
[20:22] <arraybolt3> (but Matrix is more accessible in a lot of ways too)
[20:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: falcosecurity-libs (noble-proposed/universe) [0.15.1-1ubuntu2 => 0.15.1-1ubuntu3] (no packageset)
[20:23] <arraybolt3> anyway we're going to have IRC/Matrix bridging pretty soon here so getting people in this room may be easier in the future.
[20:23] <Eickmeyer> This isn't a Matrix vs IRC issue, it's a *the Release Team is here, therefore the Flavor Contacts **MUST** be here* issue.
[20:23] <arraybolt3> right. I just had the false idea that it was OK for them to simply be relayed the messages by others and then have their response relayed back.
[20:23] <bdmurray> Rudra adding a 3rd point of contact in a venue which doesnt' have release team members doesn't count in my opinion. It'd be better to email<EMAIL_ADDRESS>about such changes.
[20:24] <Eickmeyer> arraybolt3: ^ and no, relaying messages doesn't count.
[20:24] <arraybolt3> +1
[20:24] <rs2009> np :) we don't have any team members around the Americas unfortunately, so I'm not clear as to how we could avoid the eventuality where no one in the team's around to give a +1, unless other flavor leads/release team members can intervene in such a scenario (when the primary points of contact are inaccessible, that is)
[20:25] <arraybolt3> rs2009: I'm in North America and could potentially help with that, though I think Simon may be even more accessible than I am.
[20:25] <tsimonq2> I'd happily be a contact, Unity was my first ever DE. :)
[20:25] <Eickmeyer> rs2009: Maik is actually in this room but not paying attention. He's in The Netherlands or Belgium AIUI, but either way, you have more timezone spread.
[20:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted falcosecurity-libs [source] (noble-proposed) [0.15.1-1ubuntu3]
[20:27] <tsimonq2> Matrix is favored by some, IRC is favored by others, nothing new there, what *is* somewhat new is forcing people to be in one because you don't like the other.
[20:28] <tsimonq2> And as arraybolt3 from the Matrix Council said, bridging is in progress.
[20:28] <arraybolt3> tsimonq2: I think you missed some context. "Eickmeyer │ This isn't a Matrix vs IRC issue, it's a *the Release Team is here, therefore the Flavor Contacts **MUST** be here* issue."
[20:28] <Eickmeyer> tsimonq2: That's not what's going on. What's going on is that the Release Team hasn't moved yet, and probably won't until after release.
[20:28] <arraybolt3> And probably won't move at all I would guess, and they shouldn't have to.
[20:28] <tsimonq2> Move, or bridge?
[20:29] <arraybolt3> From my most recent meeting, we should have experimental IRC bridging active in about a week, and this is a channel we're specifically targetting to bridge.
[20:29] <Eickmeyer> It'll probably bridge, more than likely.
[20:29] <tsimonq2> Good.
[20:29] <Eickmeyer> Either way, the contacts need to be **here** for the time being until that happens. Full stop.
[20:30] <rs2009> bdmurray: ah yep, I probably should have sent in an email mentioning fuseteam as the third contact earlier; oh, and, arraybolt3 & tsimonq2: having the both of you as contacts would be awesome, thank you! (to be able to give a go-ahead in a situation like this, where the images are well-tested and only await someone's approval)
[20:32] <rs2009> I'll make sure to alert Maik and Tobiyo to join/frequent this channel tomorrow; gonna hit the hay now, cya everyone!
[20:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lubuntu-meta (noble-proposed/universe) [24.04.7build1 => 24.04.8] (lubuntu)
[20:39] <tsimonq2> ACK, need for final ^^^^
[20:42] <jbicha> tsimonq2: you might as well handle bug 2060898 for Lubuntu too
[20:42] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2060898 in ubuntu-mate-meta (Ubuntu Noble) "Trying to install gimp-help-en threatens to install wslu" [High, Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2060898
[20:49] <Eickmeyer> Oh, uh... that would eventually hit Studio too. Fix please tsimonq2? 🥺 👉 👈
[20:49] <Eickmeyer> j/k
[20:50] <sil2100> Syncing mirrors! Still some images need to be published later after an ACK, but no need to wait with all the others o/
[20:50] <tsimonq2> sil2100: Thank you :)
[20:50] <sil2100> yw!
[20:50] <tsimonq2> jbicha: ack :) thanks
[20:51] <tsimonq2> Eickmeyer: Don't tempt me with a good time. :P
[20:51] <Eickmeyer> tsimonq2: HAHAHAHA
[21:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-snapshot (noble-proposed/main) [46.0-1ubuntu2 => 46.2-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[21:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: linux-firmware-raspi (noble-proposed/restricted) [11-0ubuntu1 => 12-0ubuntu1] (raspi)
[21:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lubuntu-meta (noble-proposed/universe) [24.04.7build1 => 24.04.9] (lubuntu)
[21:36] <Eickmeyer> bdmurray, jbicha: Despite chromium-browser appearing in Ubuntu Studio's manifest, I have no idea why it's there. It's not directly seeded, so it's being pulled-in by something.
[21:36] <Eickmeyer> Also, on my newly-installed system (from the current beta candidate that just got published as beta), I had no chromium snap installed.
[21:37] <Eickmeyer> In fact, it said chromium-browser-l10n had been manually installed.
[21:38] <jbicha> Eickmeyer: maybe something is pulling in www-browser and something in the ISO build thinks chromium-browser can satisfy that?
[21:38] <Eickmeyer> That's my guess. I'm going to directly seed firefox's .deb to make sure that doesn't happen.
[21:39] <bdmurray> * Chose chromium-browser out of www-browser to satisfy digikam
[21:42] <Eickmeyer> Ah, yep. There it is.
[21:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted indicator-messages [source] (noble-proposed) [13.10.1+18.10.20180918-0ubuntu7]
[21:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lubuntu-installer-prompt (noble-proposed/universe) [24.04.4build2 => 24.04.5] (no packageset)
[21:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntustudio-meta (noble-proposed/universe) [24.04.18build1 => 24.04.19] (ubuntustudio)
[21:47] <vorlon> rs2009: so the process for giving the +1 is to mark it as ready on the ISO tracker, that didn't need to be done on Americas time, it could have been done at any point in the day, once the testing was done....
[21:48] <teward> wxl: it's up to you to justify the release of lubuntu-installer-prompt, but that might not happen immediately, because freezes, etc.
[21:49] <teward> just sayin.
[21:53] <vorlon> rs2009: and also, once there's a launchpad 'ubuntu unity release' team we can link the ISO tracker to, you can manage delegations yourself without having to coordinate with the release team manually
[21:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libxmlb [sync] (noble-proposed) [0.3.18-1]
[21:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: stellarsolver (noble-proposed/universe) [2.5-1build2 => 2.5-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[21:59] <vorlon> doko: going to need some strong justification for a post-beta python3.12 update, given the state of the archive and the trade-offs wrt autopkgtests in the remaining time
[21:59] <vorlon> bdmurray: ^
[21:59] <bdmurray> :-(
[22:00] <vorlon> bdmurray: well you can just reject it straight away, that's what a frown means right?
[22:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted stellarsolver [source] (noble-proposed) [2.5-1ubuntu1]
[22:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: prelink (noble-proposed/universe) [0.0.20131005-1.1build2 => 0.0.20131005-1.1ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[22:05] <bdmurray> I was just feeling sad for all those workers.
[22:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted prelink [source] (noble-proposed) [0.0.20131005-1.1ubuntu1]
[22:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: edubuntu-meta (noble-proposed/universe) [<IP_ADDRESS>build1 => 24.04.13] (no packageset)
[22:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cups (noble-proposed/main) [2.4.7-1.2ubuntu5 => 2.4.7-1.2ubuntu6] (core, i386-whitelist)
[22:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (noble-proposed/main) [1:24.04.12 => 1:24.04.13] (core)
[22:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pike8.0 (noble-proposed/universe) [8.0.1738-1.3build1 => 8.0.1738-1.3ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[22:24] <ginggs> vorlon: iirc, python3.12 didn't trigger that many autopkgtests
[22:24] <ginggs> python3-defaults is the big one
[22:26] <bdmurray> only 390
[22:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pike8.0 [source] (noble-proposed) [8.0.1738-1.3ubuntu1]
[22:26] <bdmurray> which I gues isn't that many
[22:26] <ahasenack> and they all pass on the first try, right? :)
[22:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dcfldd (noble-proposed/universe) [1.9.1-1ubuntu1 => 1.9.1-1ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[22:28] <bdmurray> sssh
[22:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xdg-desktop-portal (noble-proposed/main) [1.18.2-1ubuntu4 => 1.18.3-1ubuntu1] (desktop-core)
[22:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dcfldd [source] (noble-proposed) [1.9.1-1ubuntu2]
[22:31] <ginggs> They should :-) the current 3.12.2-5 is a includes the changes from the 3.12.3 branch
[22:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (mantic-proposed) [24.1.3-0ubuntu1~23.10.2]
[22:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (jammy-proposed) [24.1.3-0ubuntu1~22.04.1]
[22:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloud-init [source] (focal-proposed) [24.1.3-0ubuntu1~20.04.1]
[22:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: prime-phylo (noble-proposed/universe) [1.0.11-10build3 => 1.0.11-10ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[23:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted prime-phylo [source] (noble-proposed) [1.0.11-10ubuntu1]
[23:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ruby-fusefs (noble-proposed/universe) [0.7.0-5build6 => 0.7.0-5ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[23:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-shell-extension-ubuntu-dock [source] (noble-proposed) [89ubuntu4]
[23:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ruby-fusefs [source] (noble-proposed) [0.7.0-5ubuntu1]
[23:24] <vorlon> ginggs: ok, I'll leave this for you to review/approve then
[23:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted bpftrace [source] (noble-proposed) [0.20.2-1ubuntu4]
[23:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted upower [sync] (noble-proposed) [1.90.3-1]
[23:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: slrn (noble-proposed/universe) [1.0.3+dfsg-6build2 => 1.0.3+dfsg-6ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[23:45] <vorlon> jbicha: is there a post-beta justification for webkit2gtk? the Debian changelog doesn't show anything interesting; and afaik this is not part of core GNOME
[23:46] <vorlon> RAOF: heh https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates/GNOME only covers releases through lunar?
[23:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted slrn [source] (noble-proposed) [1.0.3+dfsg-6ubuntu1]
[23:53] <jbicha> vorlon: new webkit2gtk releases are usually security fixes. An advisory wasn't posted at https://webkitgtk.org/ yet but Ubuntu Security routinely releases these new versions to supported Ubuntu releases for ~3 years
[23:54] <vorlon> jbicha: but this wasn't submitted via the security team
[23:56] <jbicha> before stable release, I routinely push these new releases even after Beta. Is your concern this time the autopkgtest load?
[23:57] <vorlon> jbicha: my concern is the overall state of the release.  In calmer times we might be more lenient; right now I'm trying to balance overall capacity to land the things we accept, *and* any resource contention that might result on builders / autopkgtests / britney
[23:57] <jbicha> I haven't been affected by specific issues fixed in 2.44.1 or fixed in the debian/ packaging
[23:58] <jbicha> ok, the riscv64 build often takes a few days for webkit2gtk even though we improved it a bit by dropping the 4.0 API build
[23:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gimp-plugin-registry [sync] (noble-proposed) [9.20240404]
[23:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: juce (noble-proposed/universe) [7.0.5+ds-1build2 => 7.0.5+ds-2] (no packageset) (sync)