[00:13] <Bashing-om> TJ-: While waiting, how about shedding some lignt on my ignorance in booting 15.04 to terminal /// can I add the boot parameter " systemd.unit=multi-user.target ' To grub's boot line and still come up with networking ability ?
[00:14] <TJ-> I'm not sure :)
[00:14] <Bashing-om> TJ-: Thn I fixing to test with OP ... I know I can boot to terminal with 'text' but that gives no networking ability by default .
[00:15] <TJ-> Yes, according to the man-pages that is correct
[00:16] <TJ-> multi-user.target
[00:16] <TJ->            A special target unit for setting up a multi-user system (non-graphical). This is pulled in by graphical.target.
[00:16] <TJ-> systemd.unit=, rd.systemd.unit=
[00:16] <TJ->            Overrides the unit to activate on boot. Defaults to default.target. This may be used to temporarily boot into a different boot
[00:16] <TJ->            unit, for example rescue.target or emergency.service.
[00:23] <Bashing-om> TJ-: Thanks for the confirmation. Maybe time to test with JeanMV / If I get no joy with my present procedure .
[03:07] <lotuspsychje> good morning to all
[03:09] <OerHeks> geut meurning
[03:11] <lotuspsychje> heuw eur you deing OerHeks :p
[03:12] <OerHeks> Modem broke down, got new modem, multi port and wireless..
[03:12] <lotuspsychje> wich brand?
[03:12] <OerHeks> when i unpacked that thing i was afraid it was an 100 mbit thing.. but no, 1000 mbit :-D
[03:12] <lotuspsychje> your online too much, you smokes it haha
[03:12] <OerHeks> Thompson
[03:12] <lotuspsychje> nice nice
[03:13] <OerHeks> sure, 4 years 24/7, that thing worked well
[03:13] <lotuspsychje> http://news.softpedia.com/news/ubuntu-snappy-core-and-raspberry-pi-2-powered-mycroft-device-successfully-founded-491257.shtml
[03:13] <lotuspsychje> check the mycroft video :p its cool
[03:13] <lotuspsychje> seems cooler then the ninja snappy thing
[03:15] <lotuspsychje> the video from here: https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/aiforeveryone/mycroft-an-open-source-artificial-intelligence-for/posts/1323377
[03:15] <lotuspsychje> mycroft fix my modem! lol
[03:21] <OerHeks> user admin pass admin .. really, Ziggo ?
[03:21] <lotuspsychje> admin 1234 :p
[03:21] <lotuspsychje> good security job
[03:21] <OerHeks> That gigabit modem makes me forget this stupid error.
[03:22] <OerHeks> .. anyone wants a *hardly*-used-sitecom router?
[03:22] <lotuspsychje> not me, i swear by linksys
[03:24] <OerHeks> SO i had some days without internet, and pulled all hardware from my basement. *backpain*
[03:24] <lotuspsychje> ouch
[03:25] <OerHeks> I should make a video, computer-hoarders :-D
[03:25] <lotuspsychje> :p
[03:26] <OerHeks> found a pretty calculator too, TI 84 plus .. maybe it can run linux
[03:27] <lotuspsychje> what does it run by default
[03:29] <OerHeks> 1.5 MB FLASH ROM 24KB RAM .. but it has a USB port
[03:30] <lotuspsychje> cewl
[03:31] <OerHeks> not sure what is running this device. all i know it costs 99 euro's
[03:36] <lotuspsychje> snappy on a calculator lol
[07:28] <lordievader> Good morning
[17:54] <daftykins> i'm back everybody!
[17:55] <daftykins> https://www.dropbox.com/s/sjjjxtq1hy45x0m/IMG_20150906_174622.jpg?dl=0
[17:55] <daftykins> only minor damage done this time ;)
[17:55] <OerHeks> hi daftykins
[17:55] <daftykins> \o
[17:56] <daftykins> how are we all?
[17:56] <OerHeks> looks good, coagulated
[17:57] <OerHeks> friday my modem went bezerk, got a new one. doing fine, i guess.
[17:58] <daftykins> woohoo \o/
[17:58] <daftykins> cable tech over there i presume?
[17:59] <OerHeks> Not sure, modem worked fine for 4 years 24/7
[18:00] <OerHeks> but now i have an mmodem/gigabit router with wireless .. can i make you happy with a sitecom router?
[18:00] <daftykins> i mean coaxial cable is how it comes into the property?
[18:00] <daftykins> we're all phone line based over here, copper twisted pair - so ADSL2/VDSL2
[18:00] <OerHeks> coaxial yes. maybe a thunderstorm caused it, but then my tv decoder should be toast too
[18:01] <OerHeks> or the modem was the weak spot, cannot tell.
[18:01] <OerHeks> 1 device less to pay power for :-D
[18:04] <OerHeks> daftykins, so do you have a google road trip map where you went ?
[18:04] <daftykins> hmm i can make one, sure
[18:10] <daftykins> silly google maps doesn't know you can take a ferry to Portsmouth, England instead of Poole
[18:12] <daftykins> https://www.google.gg/maps/dir/Guernsey/BikePark+Wales,+Abercanaid,+Wales,+United+Kingdom/Forest+of+Dean+District,+United+Kingdom/Guernsey/@50.5495637,-2.5253531,7.64z/data=!4m26!4m25!1m5!1m1!1s0x480d20e4f4bfb3ed:0x990ad58a5d0d9899!2m2!1d-2.585278!2d49.465691!1m5!1m1!1s0x486e3c82c5f1825b:0xdef51d439910375c!2m2!1d-3.361175!2d51.718125!1m5!1m1!1s0x4871a59e4034a2d9:0x40d8b23d4978ac0!2m2!1d-2.5765283!2d51.7818576!1m5!1m1!1s0x480d20
[18:12] <daftykins> ouch at that URL :D
[18:14] <OerHeks> it works!
[18:14] <OerHeks> oh ithought you made a round trip on Guernsey
[18:14] <daftykins> hehe that'd take 40 minutes to drive :)
[18:14] <daftykins> (seriously)
[18:23] <lotuspsychje> good evening mates
[18:24] <OerHeks> hi lotus
[18:24] <lotuspsychje> http://news.softpedia.com/news/linux-missing-apps-is-no-longer-a-reason-to-not-dump-windows-491281.shtml
[18:24] <lotuspsychje> hi there OerHeks
[18:25] <daftykins> \o
[18:25] <lotuspsychje> hi daftykins :p
[18:25] <daftykins> i am back from mountain bikings!
[18:25] <lotuspsychje> cool
[18:26] <lotuspsychje> i once saw a downhill snake-road video, was so crazy
[18:27] <lotuspsychje> they passed by each other so close to the cliffs
[18:28] <daftykins> :S
[18:29] <daftykins> http://ep1.pinkbike.org/p4pb11919604/p4pb11919604.jpg
[18:29] <daftykins> there's the bike i hired one afternoon whilst mine was broken :D
[18:30] <lotuspsychje> nice bike
[18:30] <lotuspsychje> i want an electric bike :p
[18:31] <daftykins> ^_^
[18:33] <lotuspsychje> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rWrQJC7PVe4
[18:33] <lotuspsychje> lol
[18:35] <lotuspsychje> TJ-: good evening
[18:38] <TJ-> lotuspsychje: good evening :) Anything interesting happening?
[18:39] <lotuspsychje> chilling on irc :p
[18:43] <TJ-> I've jost sat down to do some bluez/bluetooth hacking
[18:44]  * daftykins reads a live blog of the ongoing Apple event - aka the cult news
[18:45] <lotuspsychje> TJ-: ssshhhh the channel is logged :p
[18:46] <TJ-> huh?
[18:47] <lotuspsychje> h4cking :p
[18:47] <daftykins> ;]
[18:47] <TJ-> You mean cracking? see http://www.catb.org/jargon/html/H/hacker.html
[18:47] <lotuspsychje> lol
[18:48] <daftykins> :)
[20:08] <OerHeks> lolz @ daftykins 'install windows' .. maybe he is on mac
[20:08] <daftykins> also possible :)
[20:08] <daftykins> i just find it silly sometimes when you get these people trying to pass on their personal emergencies, when sometimes trying to achieve their tasks with Linux is going to be an uphill battle
[20:09] <daftykins> so if it _really_ does have a time factor, do it the way it'll work :>
[22:19] <cyberscmc> hey


[06:09] <brobostigon> morning
[08:50] <zxmoypi> o/
[09:52] <brobostigon> \o
[13:15] <Chunkyz> I mean afternoon
[13:15] <Chunkyz> Yes!


[01:01] <doctormo> Hey lfaraone are you still doing sugar on a buntu?
[01:02] <lfaraone> doctormo: yes, I am.
[01:02] <doctormo> lfaraone: I was surprised to hear of your involvement when I was on my way to FOSSed
[01:02] <lfaraone> doctormo: oh? why's that?
[01:02] <lfaraone> doctormo: Ian told me you said hi.
[01:04] <doctormo> lfaraone: normally the community is very fragmented, it was a pleasant surprise to see a project involved with someone who I consider to be inside the bowels of ubuntu packaging.
[01:04] <lfaraone> doctormo: yeah, we're working on that :) thanks. more hands welcome, of course.
[01:30] <doctormo> lfaraone: I'm not really a developer other than python, although I was thinking of all the google docs people when I wrote yesterday's blog post.
[02:20] <ScottK> lfaraone: Got python-xpcom figured out yet?
[03:30] <lfaraone> ScottK: no, I'm not very familiar with the problems faced in that situation.
[04:09] <ScottK> lfaraone: Short version is xulrunner no longer ships python-xpcom which a bunch of sugar apps depend on.
[04:10] <lfaraone> ScottK: is there a reason it's excluded from Ubuntu? (IIRC it's in Debian)
[04:10] <ScottK> lfaraone: Debian is still on the older xulrunner that supported it.
[04:11] <micahg> lfaraone: chrisccoulson said he'd look into packaging pyxpcom
[04:17] <lfaraone> ScottK: ah, makes sense then.
[04:17] <lfaraone> micahg: awesome. is there a way I can help out?
[04:17] <micahg> lfaraone: I don't have any details at this point, as soon as I hear something, I'll let you know
[04:18] <micahg> ScottK: is it ok to subscribe an AA to a bug where they only need to act on 1 task out of 4?
[04:25] <ScottK> micahg: Yes, but please make sure there's a clear comment about what they need to do.
[04:32] <micahg> ScottK: k, thanks
[07:41] <raywang> hey there, I have a problem that I want to use apt-get to only download packages, but not installing then, i could pass -d option. but if want to download the packages to other directory rather than /var/cache/apt/archives,  is that possible? :-)
[07:48] <james_w> raywang: you can do it with "aptitude download"
[07:49] <raywang> jacob, if then, using aptitude system wouldn't conflict with apt system ?
[07:49] <raywang> oops, sorry
[07:49] <raywang> james_w, I have learned they don't share the same database
[07:49] <james_w> raywang: just downloading the file doesn't do anything to the database
[07:50] <raywang> ok
[07:50] <james_w> and doesn't install to the system, so there is not an issue
[07:50] <raywang> james_w, make sense, but they are conflict, aren't they?
[07:51] <raywang> i mean if I use both to install packages
[07:51] <james_w> raywang: no, it's not a problem to use both
[07:52] <raywang> got it, thanks a lot :)
[07:54] <raywang> james_w, by reading manpage, aptitude download just download package to current dir, then how can I specify a directory for it?
[07:56] <james_w> raywang: cd :-)
[07:56] <raywang> well, it can be a workaround. :-)
[07:56] <raywang> thank you
[08:57] <LucidFox> http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/gnome-globalmenu <-- Is there a point for getting this into Ubuntu anymore? It basically duplicates the functionality for the UNE global menu, except for GTK only and in a more hackish way.
[09:10] <jcastro> LucidFox: not really
[09:10] <LucidFox> I'll archive it, then?
[09:13] <siretart> I'd think so. if the submitter feels otherwise, he'll probably argue about this
[09:45] <LucidFox> http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/revu1-incoming/mangler-1007160700/mangler-1.2.0/debian/patches/05_zap_la.patch <-- hmmmm
[09:45] <BlackZ> dholbach: sablotron has not a section so soyuz will never upload it, I reported that to debian
[09:45] <LucidFox> Would a better way be patching just .am and calling dh_autoreconf?
[09:45] <BlackZ> (a section in the source package)
[09:46] <dholbach> BlackZ: that should be fixed in soyuz
[09:46] <BlackZ> dholbach: but the package has not a section in the source package
[09:46] <dholbach> ah ok
[09:53] <LucidFox> Is the rule about MOTUs needing one other developer to review new packages still in effect?
[09:56] <dholbach> LucidFox: I think it says "encouraged" or something
[09:57] <wgrant> BlackZ, dholbach: What's this issue?
[09:57] <BlackZ> wgrant: we're not able to upload a package without the section in the source package
[09:57] <dholbach> wgrant: sorry, I misunderstdoof the problem
[09:57] <BlackZ> dholbach: tried that
[09:57] <dholbach> BlackZ: tried what?
[09:58] <BlackZ> dholbach: you tried to upload sablotron
[09:58] <dholbach> ah ok
[09:58] <dholbach> yes
[09:58] <BlackZ> I meant that ;)
[10:10] <LucidFox> In that case, could someone review http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/juffed ? Just want one advocate and then I'll upload.
[10:10] <LucidFox> been lying for a while without any comments at all
[10:10] <BlackZ> LucidFox: we should encourage who wants to get a new package in ubuntu to get it in debian directly
[10:11] <LucidFox> Well, thing is, unlike Ubuntu, I don't have direct upload rights into Debian :)
[10:12] <LucidFox> granted, I *could* upload it to mentors.debian.net and file an ITP...
[10:13] <BlackZ> LucidFox: if you want to upload it go ahead (if it's good for upload), but tell the REVU uploader to try getting it in debian directly
[10:13] <LucidFox> Eh... It's mine.
[10:13] <LucidFox> I packaged it
[10:13] <BlackZ> LucidFox: ah, ok
[10:14] <LucidFox> by the way, BlackZ, I'm looking at ppa-purge
[10:14] <BlackZ> LucidFox: I have to fix some things with it -- BTW it's better to get ppa-purge just in ubuntu as debian does not support PPAs
[10:15]  * LucidFox nods
[10:15] <Rhonda> LucidFox: Got my shirt!!
[10:15] <LucidFox> Pix plz? :)
[10:15] <LucidFox> of the shirt, I mean
[10:16] <Rhonda> LucidFox: http://www.cafepress.co.uk/VEWarning
[10:18] <LucidFox> BlackZ> commented on ppa-purge
[10:19] <BlackZ> LucidFox: I'll check
[10:20] <LucidFox> Other than that looks fine, fix those problems and I'll advocate it.
[10:21] <BlackZ> LucidFox: I can advocate it myself too but I'd prefer to wait
[10:21] <BlackZ> I have it in my TODO list :)
[10:21] <LucidFox> Wait? What for?
[10:22] <BlackZ> LucidFox: some fix in debian/rules, for example: add get-orig-source
[10:24] <BlackZ> LucidFox: I'll do a new upload on REVU soon
[10:24]  * LucidFox nods
[10:27] <geser> lfaraone: as you care about the sugar packages: what should happen to the remaining 0.84 and 0.86 sugar packages in the archive?
[10:29] <LucidFox> dholbach, while on the subject of Behind MOTU: I never got an interview, because apparently I was MOTU'd before they became standard practice; is there any point in doing one now?
[10:32] <dholbach> LucidFox: sure
[10:32] <dholbach> LucidFox: I'd love it to be more active again, but I just don't have time for it any more :-/
[10:39] <LucidFox> dholbach> So, who could I contact to have an interview? Your successor?
[10:39] <LucidFox> When one emerges, that is
[10:40] <LucidFox> For that matter, how are the interviews done? In real time IM, or in voice chat, or does the interviewee send a text file with all the answers at once?
[10:43] <dholbach> LucidFox: I just sent an email
[10:43] <dholbach> LucidFox: and it was very boring because I always used the same questions :)
[10:43] <LucidFox> Heh
[10:43] <dholbach> LucidFox: I'll send you one :-P
[10:43] <LucidFox> I suppose I could volunteer to succeed you - after my interview is done, though, because it would be odd to interview myself :)
[10:44] <dholbach> awesome
[10:44] <LucidFox> Yes, I saw your email in the mailing list, that's why I was asking
[10:44] <dholbach> LucidFox: if you have a wordpress.com account, can you let me know which email you used to register with?
[10:44] <dholbach> LucidFox: and nigelb wants to be co-editor
[10:44] <dholbach> awesome
[10:44] <dholbach> :-D
[10:44] <dholbach> a team!
[10:46] <nigelb> LucidFox: ah, you're there too :)
[10:46] <nigelb> do you want to interview yourself or want me to do it ? :p
[10:47] <LucidFox> I jut said it would be odd to interview myself, so I'd rather let either dholbach or you do it
[10:47] <dholbach> LucidFox: just about to send that mail
[10:47] <LucidFox> and dholbach, my wordpress.com email is the same as here<EMAIL_ADDRESS>account name LucidFox
[10:47] <dholbach> thanks LucidFox
[10:47] <dholbach> nigelb: your wordpress.com email you registered with?
[10:48] <nigelb> nigelbabu@gmail
[10:49] <dholbach> LucidFox, nigelb: done
[10:49] <dholbach> in the past I interviewed people who just joined MOTU team
[10:50] <dholbach> maybe it'd make sense to move to people who join ubuntu-dev now? I don't know
[10:50] <dholbach> I'll leave that to you guys :)
[10:51] <dholbach> oh and also add it to https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Interviews
[10:53] <nigelb> LucidFox: what is your TZ?
[10:53] <LucidFox> UTC+6, UTC+7 DST
[10:53] <xelister> hi,  how would I go about customizing an ubuntu live CD
[10:54] <xelister> I just need to have some script auto-run (after X is started),  change default config (disable gfx effects etc)   and perhaps remove list of packages on cd
[10:54] <nigelb> LucidFox: ok, we're only 2 to 2.5 hours apart.  Talk in the evening? (I'm at work now)
[10:54] <LucidFox> Sure
[10:55] <nigelb> :)
[10:57] <dholbach> LucidFox, nigelb: thanks so much!
[10:58] <dholbach> LucidFox, nigelb: agraner also does some interviews, maybe she has a few ideas how to do stuff as well
[10:58] <dholbach> ROCK!
[10:58] <nigelb> dholbach: yeah, watiting for oscon to end
[11:06] <BlackZ> LucidFox: new version of ppa-purge uploaded to REVU
[11:07] <BlackZ> however I did not created the get-orig-source rule in debian/rules as a Vcs field is already in debian/control , so you will be warned if there's a new branch
[11:20] <tumbleweed> BlackZ: get-orig-source is for building repacks, it shouldn't have anything to do with Vcs
[11:21] <BlackZ> tumbleweed: in this case you can use bzr-builddeb
[11:22] <BlackZ> if you put a Vcs field in debian/control it will warn you about the new branch
[11:23] <tumbleweed> BlackZ: are you saying that the upstream maintains /debian too?
[11:23] <BlackZ> tumbleweed: yes
[11:24] <tumbleweed> aah, in that case it's probably best to think of it as a native package
[11:24] <tumbleweed> then you don't need get-orig-source
[11:24] <BlackZ> actually I'm not sure if it can be a native ubuntu package
[11:26] <tumbleweed> then it might be best to fork the packaging. What if we need to change something?
[11:27] <BlackZ> tumbleweed: well, upstream has different things in debian/ than us, this is one of the reason why I'm not advocating it yet
[11:28] <BlackZ> I need to talk with upstream
[11:28] <tumbleweed> BlackZ: um, I'd just completely ignore upstream's /debian and overwrite it with our own (unless they want to maintain it in Ubuntu)
[11:28] <BlackZ> tumbleweed: this is what I'm doing
[11:29] <tumbleweed> then drop the Vcs-Bzr entry beacues it won't be accurate
[11:30] <BlackZ> tumbleweed: I was just about to do that ;)
[11:31] <tumbleweed> right. and if upstream doesn't produce tarballs, we should still have get-orig-source
[11:31] <BlackZ> tumbleweed: I will check, for now I'd upload it on REVU so anyone can check it
[11:34] <BlackZ> tumbleweed: thanks for the hint, dropped :)
[14:05] <lfaraone> geser: well, they work IIRC, so there's no real reason to remove them, I guess.
[14:29] <geser> lfaraone: "Package sugar-calculate-activity version 30-5 has an unmet dep:", "Depends: python-sugar-0.84 | python-sugar-0.86" and sugar-base-0.84 got deleted with "sugar .84 removing in favour of .88" and the same for sugar-base-0.86
[14:33] <lfaraone> geser: all of those activities should be forward-compatible, so file a bug and we'll correct the deps.
[14:59] <geser> lfaraone: done, I've files some unmetdeps bugs on sugar packages and made sure that the sugarteam is subscribed to them (two of those packages have also a removal request filed, so please decide what to do with them)
[15:00] <lfaraone> geser: awesome, thanks.
[15:14] <dupondje> BlackZ: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tulip/+bug/608628 => updated debdiff :)
[15:16] <cosme> dupondje, in your last debdiff
[15:16] <cosme> Change libgl1-mesa-swx11-dev to libgl1-mesa-dev in Build-Depends, this fix FTBFS (LP:#553638)
[15:16] <cosme> should be duanedesign, Change libgl1-mesa-swx11-dev to libgl1-mesa-dev in Build-Depends, this fix FTBFS (LP: #553638)
[15:20] <dupondje> err cosme what wrong exactly ?
[15:21] <cosme> (LP:#553638) -> (LP: #553638)
[15:22] <dupondje> oh, it was a copy/paste. i'll change
[15:23] <lfaraone> geser: just fyi re bug 608766, IIRC the new pippy uploaded yesterday is uninstallable in Maverick (as well as unstable)
[15:23]  * lfaraone is currently setting up a stable VM to see if that's the case.
[15:24] <dupondje> cosme: new debdiff uploaded :)
[15:25] <geser> hmm, why did ubottu return a wrong subject for that bug?
[15:26] <lfaraone> bug git+ssh://git.debian.org/git/collab-maint/sugar-jigsawpuzzle-activity.git
[15:26] <geser> lfaraone: so better not sync it? the current version in the archive has a versioned build-dependency on a virtual package
[15:26] <lfaraone> * bug 608766
[15:26] <lfaraone> ah, now it gets it right. odd.
[15:27] <lfaraone> geser: well, python-box2d (the non-existant package it depends on) is packaged and ready for sponsoring in Debian, but it's not yet there yet.
[15:27] <lfaraone> geser: once the package is in and synced over, we should be good.
[16:26] <MTecknology> dholbach: I nominate persia!
[16:30] <LucidFox> dholbach, nigelb> Sent my interview answers
[16:35] <nigelb> dholbach: what's the process that we have to do?
[16:37] <tuxracer_> dholbach: thank you for the very nice introduction on the developer week
[16:43] <dholbach> MTecknology: for what?
[16:43] <dholbach> nigelb: ask questions, blog, add to wiki.ubuntu.com/Interviews :)
[16:43] <dholbach> LucidFox: super, I'll have a look tomorrow
[16:43] <dholbach> tuxracer_: anytime :)
[16:45] <MTecknology> dholbach: the blog
[16:45] <dholbach> MTecknology: sure, but I was planing to hand off the interviews to LucidFox and nigelb
[16:46] <MTecknology> dholbach: or that - Just wanted to mention it :)
[17:06] <shadeslayer> hmm.. any one who can sync choqok ?
[17:08] <shadeslayer> bug 608378
[17:24] <Steve132> I'm rebuilding the package gcc-mingw32
[17:24] <Steve132> from package source
[17:24] <Steve132> and I noticed that although it builds 32-bit g++
[17:25] <Steve132> it is configured to not build 64-bit targeted g++
[17:25] <Steve132> but it does build amd64-mingw32-gcc and all the binutils and the cstdlib for the 32-bit hosted 64-bit targeted cross
[17:26] <Steve132> so, I figured "This is easy..." and I added --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran
[17:26] <Steve132> in the debian/rules file
[17:27] <Steve132> and rebuilt and reinstalled the package.  Everything went fine, but a simple "Hello World" example could not find #include<iostream>...which leads me to believe that somehow libstdc++ didn't get built or installed
[17:27] <Steve132> Anyone got any hints?
[19:03] <nigelb> Just so that you all know, Rhonda is taking a class in #ubuntu-classroom now about working with debian BTS :)
[20:54] <TheMuso> /quit
[21:09] <shadeslayer> TheMuso: still here :P
[21:36] <TheMuso> shadeslayer: Yeah I am connecting to IRC via a bip proxy. I meant to type /quit to exit from my irssi client.
[21:36] <shadeslayer> TheMuso: :D
[23:10] <micahg> anyone have time to sponsor a quick no source change rebuild to lucid-proposed (bug 608940)
[23:28] <BlackZ> micahg: done
[23:28] <micahg> BlackZ: thanks :)
[23:31] <micahg> BlackZ: so MOTU let's you accept bugs for a series?
[23:31] <micahg> *lets
[23:31] <BlackZ> micahg: just for packages in universe and multiverse
[23:32]  * micahg might have to reconsider going for MOTU :)