[00:03] <troulouliou_dev> wilee-nilee, ok will do thanks
[00:03] <wilee-nilee> no problem
[00:04] <troulouliou_dev> wilee-nilee, btw uefi allow custom key in several mode as i see / pek/db ... there could be a ms-secureboot grub/kernel as well as  as ubuntu-signed secureboot grub/kernekl
[00:05] <troulouliou_dev> pretty hardtosee microsoft ca .... in the sb grub install output
[00:12] <elky> is anyone else finding that xchat on raring is a cpu hog?
[00:39] <jmichaelx> just upgraded to kubuntu raring on one machine... and things are not looking good so far
[00:40] <jmichaelx> the system is completely unusable
[00:45] <bjsnider> i can assure you that wan't one of the goals
[00:46] <jmichaelx> lol. hopefully one could have assumed that :-)
[01:16] <peepsalot> hello, i can't view my home folder in nautilus or even using ls command, it just hangs
[01:17] <peepsalot> i think it is something to do with a network share that i have mounted as a subfolder in my home directory, but the network share is not currently accessible
[03:06] <teratoma> 'meta' key ( alt ) in gnome-terminal doesnt do what it used to in quantal, what do i do?
[03:56] <xiambax_> I have full disk encryption and am looking to update to beta.
[03:56] <xiambax_> update-manager -d doesnt find a released
[03:56] <xiambax_> and i get no option to upgrade when booting to usb key
[04:03] <wilee-nilee> xiambax_, What release are you in now?
[04:05] <xiambax_> im silly
[04:05] <xiambax_> apparently i have been running betas this whole time.
[04:05] <xiambax_> its just gone so smoothly i never noticed
[08:14] <Dreaman> i use ubuntu 13.04 rc  reinstall final or just update system
[08:15] <MonkeyDust> Dreaman  just update
[08:16] <Dreaman> :) ok
[08:16] <bazhang> !final | Dreaman
[08:16] <Dreaman> ok
[08:16] <valorie> I've done the upgrades and they worked flawlessly in kubuntu
[08:17] <valorie> on both 64-bit and 32-bit for my netbook
[09:42] <captine> hi all.  seems my 13.04 sound system is broken...   output device listed as "Dummy Output"
[12:08] <derbarb> having trouble using ubuntu one to backup my files using deja dup, getting a bad request error
[12:49] <gmg85> is it true that 13.04 will have the alx ethernet driver in its kernel?
[12:53] <patdk-wk> gmg85, that would have been stabilised a long time ago
[12:55] <gmg85> patdk-wk, when i installed xubuntu  12.10....i had to download the alx ethernet driver from compact wireless and compile it myself]
[12:56] <gmg85> was wondering whether 13.04 will come with the ethernet driver so i dont have to compile the source
[12:56] <patdk-wk> how is that relevent?
[12:56] <patdk-wk> well, what kernel is it included in?
[12:56] <gmg85> 03:00.0 Ethernet controller: Atheros Communications Inc. AR8162 Fast Ethernet (rev 08)
[12:56] <gmg85> tht's my card
[12:56] <gmg85> the ubuntu kernel
[12:56] <patdk-wk> well, what kernel is it included in?
[12:56] <patdk-wk> ubuntu doesn't make kernels
[12:57] <gmg85> does it modify kernels
[12:57] <Pici> er, it definitely applies its own and others patches to kernels.
[12:59] <johnflux__> Hey all
[12:59] <johnflux__> vim in 13.04 is compiled without clipboard support
[12:59] <johnflux__> this is a regression  - is it known?
[12:59] <patdk-wk> johnflux__, checked launchpad?
[13:00] <BluesKaj> Hey all
[13:01] <johnflux__> patdk-wk: how?
[13:03] <patdk-wk> gmg85, well, as the alx driver is not in the linux kernel, it won't be
[13:03] <johnflux__> usr13: usr13: googling, it seems that actually you have to install vim-gtk   if you want the vim console version to have clipboard support
[13:03] <johnflux__> I found https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vim/+bug/837882
[13:04] <usr13> Ok
[13:04] <gmg85> patdk-wk, i guess i will just have to download the sources and compile...what kernel version will 13.04 have?
[13:05] <patdk-wk> it's in the compat-wireless package though
[13:05] <patdk-wk> not sure what version it was included in though
[13:10] <patdk-wk> hmm, 3.8.0, where 3.8.8 is the newest
[13:11] <Rompoy> anyone knows why Ubuntu consumes double power watts than Windows?
[13:13] <yofel> patdk-wk: from the changelog the -19 kernel is v3.8.6 + patches
[13:13] <patdk-wk> ok
[13:14] <patdk-wk> still won't help him though, as the alx driver isn't in the kernel yet
[13:44] <p0wn3d> has anyone tested MATE with the 13.04 beta?
[14:07] <jmnoz> for some reason my keyboard shortcuts in xfce doesn't always seem to work properly (running under Ubuntu) any idea of how to troubleshoot?
[14:08] <SonikkuAmerica> Apparently VBox isn't supposed to be launched from Unity in Raring...?
[14:09] <SonikkuAmerica> It doesn't appear in the launcher but I can open it from the terminal with no problems.
[14:09] <wilee-nilee> SonikkuAmerica, Launches from icon here, do you have the latest?
[14:10] <SonikkuAmerica> Give me a second (or 2-3 minutes anyway...)
[14:10] <wilee-nilee> I don't use unity however
[14:10] <SonikkuAmerica> The latest what?
[14:12] <tyrog> Hello. Do you think Ubuntu 13.04 is a worthy upgrade from 12.04 lts?
[14:13] <SonikkuAmerica> Depends.
[14:14] <tyrog> SonikkuAmerica: more specifically on what? xD
[14:15] <SonikkuAmerica> tyrog: Do you need a stable (production, e.g.) environment?
[14:16] <tyrog> SonikkuAmerica: not at all. Can live with some randomness xD
[14:17] <SonikkuAmerica> Then you're welcome to; it's not required for another 9 months for 12.10 or until April 2017 for 12.04.
[14:20] <SonikkuAmerica> In fact, due to the support period being shortened, you don't have to upgrade to 13.04 at all! :)\
[14:20] <SonikkuAmerica> *:)
[14:21] <SonikkuAmerica> wilee-nilee: I have the latest updates and everything if that's what you mean...
[14:22] <Rompoy> anyone knows why Ubuntu consumes double power watts than Windows?
[14:22] <tyrog> SonikkuAmerica: we can always upgrade to 13.10 when it's released, or up to 3 months after xD
[14:23] <SonikkuAmerica> tyrog: The thing is... between January and April 2014, only 10.04 LTS Server, 12.04 LTS, 12.10 and 13.10 will be supported.
[14:24] <wilee-nilee> SonikkuAmerica, When I installed the latest release from their website I had to purge the previous to install, check your version against the oracle website. https://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Downloads
[14:24] <wilee-nilee> not sure if the ubnutu repos version is the latest
[14:25] <SonikkuAmerica> wilee-nilee: Oh. I see. I just tacked the PPA on and installed it fresh. My sources.list entry is "raring contrib"
[14:25] <SonikkuAmerica> It could be that the PPA itself is still incomplete.
[14:25] <tyrog> SonikkuAmerica: what do you think is the most reliable upgrade path? lts to lts? or interim to interim?
[14:26] <SonikkuAmerica> tyrog: I would say LTS > LTS, as they are the most stable.
[14:26] <SonikkuAmerica> I've burned a hard copy of every LTS since 10.04 (only 2 of course, but Canonical didn't catch on till now).
[14:27] <tyrog> SonikkuAmerica: do you have a dual boot LTS and current?
[14:27] <SonikkuAmerica> No. I just use the current. I'm VBoxing Xubuntu LTS and Lubuntu daily.
[14:28] <wilee-nilee> VirtualBox 4.2.12?
[14:28] <tyrog> SonikkuAmerica: do you make fresh install of each new ubuntu release?
[14:29] <SonikkuAmerica> wilee-nilee: Yep
[14:29] <SonikkuAmerica> tyrog: No, I [ do-release-upgrade ], like Debian.
[14:30] <tyrog> Never had problems with upgrades?
[14:30] <SonikkuAmerica> tyrog: The only problems I've had were the graphical version crashing.
[14:30] <tyrog> What DE do you use? And have PPAs enabled?
[14:31] <SonikkuAmerica> Unity... and tons.
[14:31] <wilee-nilee> SonikkuAmerica, I had found the unity desktop problematic in general a while back I like it it was just loosing controls at times, probably fixed now, however have you logged out or rebooted to see if this fixes the problem?
[14:32] <SonikkuAmerica> wilee-nilee: I never did, maybe that's key.
[14:32] <tyrog> Actually I like Unity in 13.04. It's a DE that grows with you with time, and with practice
[14:32] <BluesKaj> yup, do-release-upgrade here as well , keeping the system clean with autremove and autoclean after every package upgrade seems to work for this setup.
[14:34] <wilee-nilee> I like the gnome-shell you can reload it with alt-f2-r the unity desktop used to be able to reload compiz easily as well.
[14:36] <tyrog> wilee-nilee: Actually the concepts in both are similar xD. But I think Unity handles the menus of the software (File, Edit, etc.) better
[14:36] <tyrog> With more space for the open program
[14:37] <wilee-nilee> tyrog, Not really, the shell is mutter unity is compiz.
[14:38] <tyrog> wilee-nilee: compiz allows for more effects and such
[14:39] <SonikkuAmerica> Aaaaaaaaaand now I can't search my apps anymore... it's forever searching...
[14:39] <SonikkuAmerica> All the other scopes work just fine.
[14:40] <SonikkuAmerica> Let me try again.
[14:41] <wilee-nilee> tyrog, Sure to some extent, but you used to be able to run compiz --replace and one other command I forget to reload it and or set it to a default install.
[14:46]  * BluesKaj doesn't miss compiz ...kwin does the job just fine
[14:47] <wilee-nilee> I never like kubuntu, but that is a personal thing, lol
[14:48] <BluesKaj> well, i never liked gnome , it's a matter of taste , mostly i think
[14:48] <BluesKaj> unity even less
[14:50] <LukeL> cinnamon is worth a try
[14:54] <tyrog> KDE is ok. I feel it is a bit bloated though
[14:57] <BluesKaj> tyrog, perhaps because there so many options , thewre are some apps I would like to be excluded that are dependency ridden and can't be removed , only disabled
[14:58] <tyrog> BluesKaj: Yep. KDE is not only plasma. But I have to admit it is very stable with 4.10
[14:59] <BluesKaj> tyrog, yeah seems to be so far
[14:59] <derbarb> succesfully backup up /etc/vim to ubuntu one but cannot backup my home directory, got a bad request error, anyone know why this might be?
[15:02] <BluesKaj> derbarb, maybe the ppl at #ubuntuone can help
[15:25] <tyrog> wilee-nilee: I was a bit skeptical with KDE too mainly with the first 4.x releases but now I'm using it and is very enjoyable
[15:25] <tyrog> Multitasking is fast and you get all the blinks only a KDE desktop can give you xD
[15:30] <tyrog> BluesKaj: How do I disable KWin when a fullscreen app is running?
[15:30] <tyrog> like compiz does with unity
[15:33] <BluesKaj> tyrog, don'y know , never needed to
[15:33] <LukeL> it's in the settings somewhere, keep diggin :P
[15:33] <LukeL> i remember setting it
[15:33] <piero> Is fglrx hdmi audio working on 3.8 kernel for HD series 6000?
[15:35] <BluesKaj> tyrog, system settings>desktop effects >advanced, suspend desktop effects....
[15:35] <BluesKaj> for full screen
[15:37] <tyrog> BluesKaj: foud it :) Thanks. As for que Qt graphical system, do you use Raster or Native?
[15:39] <tyrog> KDE is using less RAM than Unity with about the same workload, with many desktop effects enabled. Awesome
[15:40] <BluesKaj> tyrog, I'm using raster , but just for testing , supposedly it works with Qt  better than native
[15:41] <BluesKaj> tyrog, it's difficult to tell the differnce so far
[16:46] <mrjoel> Alright.  So ginn is working with 13.04, but the rightclick actions all occur in the bottom right hand corner of the screen (this is where the "cursor" goes when the screen is touched at all.  can anyone help me?
[17:57] <johnjohn101> is it soup yet?
[18:19] <SuperLag> uname just reports 3.8.0 as the kernel, but it's actually 3.8.something else, right? How can you find out which kernel you're really running?
[18:24] <genii-around> SuperLag: no, it should say something like:  3.8.0-19-generic   or such
[18:26] <SuperLag> aaron@wanderlust ~ % uname -r
[18:26] <SuperLag> 3.8.0-19-generic
[18:26] <SuperLag> yeah...
[18:27] <SuperLag> but that's not actually a 3.8.0 kernel... it's later, I believe
[18:27] <SuperLag> and the current stable kernel is 3.8.8
[18:27] <genii-around> !info linux-image-generic raring
[18:29] <SuperLag> hmm... okay. Maybe I'm just crazy, but I could have sworn I read somewhere that it's based on a 3.8.<greater than 0> kernel.
[18:35] <mrjoel> Anyone know why my touchscreen is sending the mouse cursor to the bottom right corner of my screen?  Is there a way to make it stay where I pointed for right-click actions?
[19:38] <FernandoMiguel> awesome.. . lot's of video corruption when using multi display on my Intel HD3000 :(
[19:42] <genii-around> Hm. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Incoming has no 13.04 listed
[20:04] <guntbert> is the deprecation of gksudo a well known thing among helpers?
[20:09] <guntbert> in case not, have a look at http://askubuntu.com/questions/284306/why-is-gksu-no-longer-installed-by-default-in-raring-13-04
[21:14] <genii-around> guntbert: Interesting. So instead of gksu/gksudo gedit   /something-priveleged     just recommended to sudo -i gedit /something-priveleged   instead?
[21:20] <nullby7e> 13.04 when?
[21:20] <bazhang> unknown
[21:21] <bjsnider> genii-around, is gksudo not installable?
[21:21] <bazhang> !info gksudo
[21:21] <genii-around> bjsnider: Apparently not
[21:21] <bazhang> !info gksu
[21:22] <bjsnider> if you grab the quantal version?
[21:22] <tyrog> 13.04 is a great release. Really improved from 12.10 in many aspects
[21:23] <bjsnider> depends on your point of view
[21:24] <tyrog> bjsnider: Of course. What is yours?
[21:25] <bjsnider> i've been using gnome 3.6 for 6 months, so there's no difference if i upgrade
[21:25] <bjsnider> until logind gets added to the gnome 3 ppa and it makes sense to upgrade for gnome 3.8
[21:25] <bjsnider> i don't use this on a phone, so i don't need to use unity
[21:25] <bjsnider> unity isn't targeted at me i suppose is the right way to say it
[21:26] <tyrog> Right. But I feel for Unity users this is the best one yet. And it has also improved in boot and shutdown time
[21:26] <tyrog> bjsnider: That's funny considering you use gnome 3.6 (suppose it is the shell) xD
[21:30] <bjsnider> i don't think gnome-shell was specifically designed for phones, but unity started out under another name as a mobile os
[21:31] <tyrog> bjsnider: You don't think gnome-shell was designed for mobile devices? So for what?
[21:31] <tyrog> Not criticizing, I like to know the desktops and play with them all to see which one suits me better
[21:32] <tyrog> You can make gnome shell very desktop-like, and very functional, but I think it was based around mobile devices.
[21:32] <bjsnider> for computers in general
[21:33] <tyrog> Ehmm, no. My productivity drops significantly if I don't install some extensions in gnome shell, compared to what gnome 2 was
[21:33] <bjsnider> mine doesn't
[21:34] <tyrog> Do you think that taking features away from most software is a desktop approach?
[21:35] <tyrog> Putting big buttons in the GUIs too?
[21:36] <natman> When is Kubuntu 13.04 released?
[21:37] <bazhang> soon
[21:37] <wilee-nilee> natman, You can install raring ubuntu and add kubuntu.
[21:37] <tyrog> wilee-nilee: Ubuntu 13.04 hasnt been released too, so there is no difference xD
[21:38] <bazhang> wilee-nilee, thats not needed at all
[21:38] <wilee-nilee> bazhang, Did not say it was needed, just an option
[21:38] <bazhang> wilee-nilee, anda hugely unneeded option
[21:39] <wilee-nilee> bazhang, In your opinion.
[21:39] <natman> wilee-nilee: why would i do that?
[21:39] <bazhang> wilee-nilee, its not good advice.
[21:39] <wilee-nilee> I would let a user decide while informed
[21:39] <tyrog> Unneeded discussion too, cmon guys
[21:39] <tyrog> Its time for party!!
[21:40] <bazhang> !party
[21:41] <tyrog> sure, just changing the mood around here xD
[21:41] <wilee-nilee> natman, I did not say you should just giving you an option, you should do what you want. ;)
[21:42] <tyrog> natman: I tried both daily ISOs of Ubuntu and Kubuntu today. If you want to use KDE, stick to Kubuntu, as you will avoid the GTK apps within kubuntu that you won't use probably
[21:43] <bazhang> natman, if you keep up to date, you will hit final
[21:43] <natman> tyrog: totally agrree, Kubuntu is the way to go
[21:43] <bazhang> !final | natman
[21:43] <johnjohn101> ubuntu release party channel back in operation
[21:44] <natman> by the way, thinking of changing to a sony vaio laptop, any idea if they are *buntu friendly?
[21:44] <tyrog> bazhang: Probably final by now. Final ISOs are prepared some days before the final release, so you might be already further from final
[21:44] <bazhang> tyrog, not me, natman
[21:46] <tyrog> natman: Don't know why they wouldn't be as friendly as the others :)
[21:46] <tyrog> Better experience for linux is with Intel wireless chips and Intel graphics too
[21:47] <tyrog> If you want to play some games, I would recommend NVIDIA graphics then
[21:47] <tyrog> Apart from that, most software is supported nowadays.
[21:47] <tyrog> *hardware
[21:52] <johnjohn101> how close is daily to released version?  or should i wait a day?
[21:53] <tyrog> johnjohn101: Wait if you are willing to, then wait. Else, install daily
[21:55] <wilee-nilee> johnjohn101, realease day and for a time after has the servers running hard, a torrent is best for downloads and seeding, a upgrade I would do now or wait, it is up to you. Todays daily is the release minus any last minute imperative updates.
[22:01] <bazhang> yeah, dont wait
[22:10] <trism> anyone notice the sidebar in nautilus not painting properly? I have to mouseover the bookmarks/network section before they appear
[22:15] <tyrog> trism: Dont have that problem. I have another in libreoffice: menus don't get "oranged" when i put the cursor over them, a fix should come in the following days
[22:45] <rendero> !isitout
[22:45] <rendero> :P
[22:45] <tyrog> bot is working xD
[22:45] <bazhang> !party
[23:27] <scarrs> hello, just upgraded to 13.04 and looking to get my workspaces back... help?
[23:29] <wilee-nilee> scarrs, nvidia card?
[23:29] <scarrs> yessir
[23:30] <wilee-nilee> scarrs, You have to reload the drivers on a upgrade.
[23:30] <scarrs> gotcha
[23:30] <scarrs> tyvm for your help
[23:30] <wilee-nilee> no problem
[23:30] <scarrs> toodles
[23:45] <scarrs> hello again have upgraded to 13.04 and lost the virtual workspaces!!! I would like to get them back... have reinstalled nvidia-current and it helps to no avail. help?
[23:46] <wilee-nilee> scarrs, I believe you have to delete what was there first.
[23:46] <wilee-nilee> this a vbox?
[23:46] <scarrs> nope
[23:47] <scarrs> should I create a new user?
[23:47] <wilee-nilee> scarrs, What helps though for channel helpers is identifying the card, not to me but the channel.
[23:48] <scarrs> VGA compatible controller: NVIDIA Corporation GF108 [GeForce GT 440] (rev a1) is what I have
[23:52] <scarrs> anyway, created a fresh account... will see if that helps
[23:55] <tyrog> The workspaces are disabled in 13.04 :P
[23:56] <trism> System Settings/Appearance/Behavior/Enable workspaces
[23:57] <tyrog> he's gone now


[09:41] <danialbehzadi> Hey
[09:41] <danialbehzadi> Anyone can look at this build log from launchpad to see what is going wrong?
[09:41] <danialbehzadi> https://launchpadlibrarian.net/297517059/buildlog.txt.gz


[10:40] <alan_g> greyback: can you confirm? Unity8 uses QtCompositor from qtmir, not Mir's MultiThreadedCompositor?
[10:41] <greyback> alan_g: confirmed
[10:44]  * alan_g add Compositor to a list of customization points that could be improved
[11:18] <alf_> alan_g: greyback: There have been various talks about changing Unity8 to MTC, but there were always more pressing topics to pursue
[11:18] <greyback> alf_: right, kdub_ did work on that, but is blocked until we adopt qt5.5
[11:30] <Saviq> alf_, hey,so I was trying lp:~afrantzis/jenkins-launchpad-plugin/deb-artifacts-in-any-dir
[11:30] <Saviq> DUH
[11:39] <Saviq> alf_, actually, seems to be working fine, yeah
[11:41] <alf_> Saviq: good to hear
[11:42] <Saviq> alf_, and it seems to work for old s-jenkins format as well, cool
[11:43] <Saviq> alf_, one thing though, think it would make sense to order alphabetically?
[11:43] <Saviq> I've always felt lost in the list tbh
[11:47] <alf_> Saviq: I think builds at the same level were ordered alphabetically by jenkins.
[11:49] <alf_> Saviq: not sure that imposing a global alphabetical sort would make things easier to read, since it would mix different levels
[11:50] <Saviq> alf_, don't think it is ordered, http://pastebin.ubuntu.com/14886578/
[11:50] <Saviq> alf_, ah wait, it is
[11:50] <Saviq> alf_, but the problem is that it's breadth-first instead of depth-first
[11:51] <alf_> Saviq: yeah, for example all the build-2-binpkg jobs are ordered
[11:51] <Saviq> alf_, right, it'd be better if it would be depth-first IMO
[11:53] <alf_> Saviq: well, ok, I can take a look, but perhaps better to leave this for a different MP? Better to have this now I think than no output at all.
[11:53] <Saviq> alf_, yeah sure, just talking :)
[12:14] <Saviq> alf_, minor comments on https://code.launchpad.net/~afrantzis/jenkins-launchpad-plugin/triggered-builds/+merge/284117
[12:29] <alf_> Saviq: thanks, commented and updated
[12:38] <Saviq> alf_, didn't save comments, did you?
[12:41] <alan_g> alf_: (not urgent) I'd like your thoughts on duflu's suggestion. (The more I think about it the more complex making it work seems - but maybe I'm missing something.) https://code.launchpad.net/~alan-griffiths/mir/fix-1535894/+merge/285058
[12:51] <alf_> Saviq: I replied inline, did these get lost?
[12:51] <Saviq> alf_, need to press "save comments" at the top
[12:51] <Saviq> alf_, should still be in your browser
[12:52] <alf_> Saviq: ah, closed tab... in any case: using set() directly would arbitrarily rearrange builds, the way it's done now the order is retained
[12:53] <Saviq> alf_, regardless if you closed tab ;)
[12:54] <Saviq> alf_, they're stored in browser
[12:54] <Saviq> alf_, right, I thought that might be the reasoning
[12:54] <Saviq> alf_, so you can go to that same URL and press Save and they should be there :0
[13:04] <Saviq> alf_, approved, let's see if they use autolanding :)
[15:38] <alf_> Saviq: Thanks for the reviews. Unless there are any objections I will trigger the recipe to publish the new version in the ppa
[15:38] <Saviq> alf_, +1 from me
[15:54] <alf_> Saviq: tools PPA now contains all the MP message goodies! Enjoy!
[15:55] <Saviq> alf_, yay, /me updates
[16:43] <mariogrip> kdub_:  AlbertA: hi could one of you help debug this issue? https://github.com/ubports/android/issues/1
[16:44] <mariogrip> android 5.1 on fairphone
[16:44] <mariogrip> 2
[17:00] <AlbertA> mariogrip: so it seems then the module open call did not return an error but returned null for the alloc_device_t...
[17:01] <AlbertA> that's in android_buffer_allocator.cpp (AndroidGraphicBufferAllocator constructor)
[17:05] <mariogrip> do you know why it does not return? it seems to print correct address
[17:05] <tvoss> mariogrip, it returns, and let's please keep the conversation in one channel
[17:05] <AlbertA> mariogrip: oh just looked at the pastebin...
[17:06] <AlbertA> mariogrip: you are missing symbols in the stack trace so could have crashed on the android side
[17:07] <tvoss> AlbertA, top of the stack is 0x0 ;) unlikely that anything is mapped to that address
[17:08] <tvoss> mariogrip, do you have a link to the actual libw module implementation handy?
[17:08] <AlbertA> null function pointer?
[17:08] <AlbertA> sounds like android side issue :)
[17:08] <tvoss> AlbertA, yup
[17:09] <tvoss> AlbertA, https://github.com/CyanogenMod/android_hardware_qcom_display/tree/cm-12.1-caf-8974
[17:09] <tvoss> AlbertA, https://github.com/CyanogenMod/android_hardware_qcom_display/blob/cm-12.1-caf-8974/libgralloc/gpu.cpp#L46
[17:09] <tvoss> alloc is null after the assignment
[17:10] <tvoss> l. 39 is funky, too, as alloc_device_t is a direct base of gpu_context_t
[17:10] <mariogrip> tvoss: libw?
[17:11] <tvoss> mariogrip, sorry, libhardware :)
[17:11] <mariogrip> https://github.com/CyanogenMod/android_hardware_libhardware
[17:11] <mariogrip> https://github.com/CyanogenMod/android_hardware_libhardware/tree/cm-12.1
[17:11] <AlbertA> tvoss: umm treating as pod, but maybe it's not a pod
[17:16] <tvoss> AlbertA, also assumes default alignment
[17:18] <tvoss> mariogrip, so I think the gralloc device is initialized here: https://github.com/CyanogenMod/android_hardware_libhardware/blob/cm-12.1/modules/gralloc/gralloc.cpp
[17:19] <mariogrip> tvoss: it should not, but I can test
[17:20] <tvoss> mariogrip, ah, no worries, I might be wrong
[17:22] <tvoss> mariogrip, I will eat something and read code later on
[17:22] <mariogrip> okey :)
[21:13] <coretex__> yay mir 0.19.1


[02:12] <rsalveti> sebjan: how many days are you going to be out for vacation?
[14:20] <ogra> hmm, so i see the analog device in pulse now
[14:20] <ogra> and can select pulse profiles
[14:20] <ogra> but i cant select the analog device as output
[15:18] <ogra> [ 2928.497467] omapdss DISPC error: GFX_FIFO_UNDERFLOW, disabling GFX
[15:18] <ogra> [ 2928.582244] omapdss DISPC error: SYNC_LOST_DIGIT, disabling TV
[15:18] <ogra> rsalveti, ^^^^
[15:18] <ogra> ndec, ^^^
[16:53] <arun_> ogra, is this related to the pandaboard display issue?
[16:54] <arun_> actually, i think that's only an issue with linaro kernels. nevermind.
[19:02] <Wizard> yo
[19:03] <Wizard> does anybody run ubuntu on pandaboard?
[19:07] <prpplague> Wizard: it is probably the most popular full distro that prople run on beagle board and panda board
[19:15] <Wizard> :)
[19:15] <Wizard> cool
[19:15] <Wizard> thanks prpplague
[19:16] <prpplague> Wizard: http://www.elinux.org/PandaBoard_Netbook
[19:18] <XorA|gone> prpplague: where mine :-D
[19:18] <XorA|gone> my netbook is still x86 :-)
[19:18] <prpplague> XorA|gone: hey hey
[19:18] <prpplague> XorA|gone: you name got kicked around a few times this week
[19:19] <XorA|gone> like an old deflated football :)
[19:19] <prpplague> XorA|gone: more like the corpse of a dead dog in an alley
[19:19] <XorA|gone> hehe
[19:19]  * prpplague jokes with XorA|gone
[19:19] <XorA|gone> prpplague: were you at ELC?
[19:19] <prpplague> XorA|gone: as soon as i get my hands on some phycores, i'll get you a net boot
[19:20] <prpplague> XorA|gone: yea
[19:20] <prpplague> XorA|gone: did a presentation
[19:20]  * XorA|gone has one of his XMs running Ubuntu natty
[19:20] <XorA|gone> just need to tuck it under the TV now
[19:20] <prpplague> XorA|gone: for an anti-social nerd, doing all this socializing wears you out
[19:21] <XorA|gone> prpplague: hehe, the beer makes it easier
[19:21] <XorA|gone> prpplague: what bad things were people saying about me?
[19:22] <prpplague> XorA|gone: hehe, no bad names, khilman was discussion some linux-omap stuff
[19:22] <GrueMaster> rsalveti: Apparently there is a bug on banshee library watcher (bug 760902).  Try disabling it and rerun banshee to see if performance is better.
[19:22] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 760902 in banshee "Banshee's Library Watcher should be disabled by default in Ubuntu 11.04" [Wishlist,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/760902
[19:22] <GrueMaster> (my systems are tied up with other tasks atm).
[19:23]  * XorA|gone needs to setup his XM so I can remote controll PA on it and send audio from my desktop to 5.1 surround system
[20:44] <rsalveti> GrueMaster: interesting
[20:44] <rsalveti> and cool, the boot is back
[20:44] <GrueMaster> the boot?
[20:45] <rsalveti> ops
[20:45] <rsalveti> bot
[20:45] <rsalveti> :-)
[20:45] <GrueMaster> Oh, bugbot returns.
[20:45] <GrueMaster> yea.


[07:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: casper (focal-proposed/main) [1.445.2 => 1.445.3] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[08:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected casper [source] (focal-proposed) [1.445.3]
[08:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: casper (focal-proposed/main) [1.445.2 => 1.445.3] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[09:07] <LocutusOfBorg> hello, I'm retrying ~20 haskell builds
[09:08] <LocutusOfBorg> queues are empty, they should finish soon, and I'll cancel in case the queues go crazy
[09:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hspec-hedgehog [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [<IP_ADDRESS>-3] (no packageset)
[09:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-versions [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [5.0.3-3] (no packageset)
[09:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hedgehog-classes [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [<IP_ADDRESS>-2] (no packageset)
[09:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hspec-hedgehog [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [<IP_ADDRESS>-3] (no packageset)
[09:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hindent [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [5.3.4-1] (no packageset)
[09:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hspec-hedgehog [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [<IP_ADDRESS>-3] (no packageset)
[09:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-versions [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [5.0.3-3] (no packageset)
[09:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-versions [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [5.0.3-3] (no packageset)
[09:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-clash-prelude [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.6.3-2] (no packageset)
[09:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hindent [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [5.3.4-1] (no packageset)
[09:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hedgehog-classes [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [<IP_ADDRESS>-2] (no packageset)
[09:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hspec-hedgehog [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [<IP_ADDRESS>-3] (no packageset)
[09:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hedgehog-classes [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [<IP_ADDRESS>-2] (no packageset)
[09:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hindent [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [5.3.4-1] (no packageset)
[09:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hspec-hedgehog [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [<IP_ADDRESS>-3] (no packageset)
[09:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hindent [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [5.3.4-1] (no packageset)
[09:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-versions [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [5.0.3-3] (no packageset)
[09:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-clash-prelude [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.6.3-2] (no packageset)
[09:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hedgehog-classes [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [<IP_ADDRESS>-2] (no packageset)
[09:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-clash-prelude [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.6.3-2] (no packageset)
[09:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-versions [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [5.0.3-3] (no packageset)
[10:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hspec-hedgehog [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [<IP_ADDRESS>-3] (no packageset)
[10:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qt6-datavis3d [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [6.3.1-3] (no packageset)
[10:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qt6-datavis3d [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [6.3.1-3] (no packageset)
[10:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qt6-datavis3d [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [6.3.1-3] (no packageset)
[10:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-clash-prelude [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.6.3-2] (no packageset)
[10:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hindent [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [5.3.4-1] (no packageset)
[10:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qt6-datavis3d [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [6.3.1-3] (no packageset)
[10:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qt6-datavis3d [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [6.3.1-3] (no packageset)
[10:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-versions [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [5.0.3-3] (no packageset)
[10:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qt6-datavis3d [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [6.3.1-3] (no packageset)
[10:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted casper [source] (focal-proposed) [1.445.3]
[10:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hedgehog-classes [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [<IP_ADDRESS>-2] (no packageset)
[11:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hindent [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [5.3.4-1] (no packageset)
[11:35] <LocutusOfBorg> hello, I'm scheduling haskell rebuilds but they should be no-op
[11:35] <LocutusOfBorg> since they are all built now
[11:36] <LocutusOfBorg> but something was canceled and never gave back
[11:36] <LocutusOfBorg> (and new packages, so they don't appear on release pocket and not detected)
[12:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-string-qq [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.0.4-2] (no packageset)
[12:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-bitwise [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [<IP_ADDRESS>-2] (no packageset)
[12:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-kvitable [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [<IP_ADDRESS>-2] (no packageset)
[13:25] <lucasmoura> hi @sil2100, we have concluded the tests for release 27.10.1 of UA and it is already sitting in proposed for more than a week. Can you please take a look to see if we can already release it to updates ?
[13:27] <jibel> sil2100, Hi, could you release gnome-shell 42.4 to jammy-updates?
[13:28] <sil2100> lucasmoura: sure!
[13:29] <sil2100> lucasmoura: oh my, it's seeded in the images, right?
[13:30] <sil2100> lucasmoura: also, is this something you would like to have for 20.04.5, or unrelated?
[13:36] <lucasmoura> sil2100, yes, I believe it is seeded
[13:36] <lucasmoura> And no, it is unrelated to 20.04.5
[13:36] <sil2100> lucasmoura: grrr, I missed it earlier. Now pushed it out
[13:37] <sil2100> But now I'll have to wait for it to get fully published :( My bad
[13:37] <lucasmoura> No worries
[13:37] <LocutusOfBorg> anybody from ubuntu-archive who can process the above haskell libraries?
[13:38] <sil2100> jibel: hey! Looking
[13:38] <sil2100> LocutusOfBorg: on it!
[13:38] <LocutusOfBorg> sil2100, if you have some little cycle more, please: LP: #1987321 LP: #1986665
[13:38] <LocutusOfBorg> two really easy debdiffs :)
[13:39] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks!
[13:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hedgehog-classes [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>-2]
[13:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hspec-hedgehog [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>-3]
[13:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hspec-hedgehog [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>-3]
[13:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hindent [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [5.3.4-1]
[13:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-versions [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [5.0.3-3]
[13:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hspec-hedgehog [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>-3]
[13:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-clash-prelude [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [1.6.3-2]
[13:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hedgehog-classes [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>-2]
[13:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hindent [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [5.3.4-1]
[13:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hspec-hedgehog [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>-3]
[13:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-versions [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [5.0.3-3]
[13:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hedgehog-classes [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>-2]
[13:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hindent [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [5.3.4-1]
[13:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-versions [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [5.0.3-3]
[13:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hindent [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [5.3.4-1]
[13:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hspec-hedgehog [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>-3]
[13:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-bitwise [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>-2]
[13:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-clash-prelude [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [1.6.3-2]
[13:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hedgehog-classes [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>-2]
[13:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hindent [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [5.3.4-1]
[13:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hspec-hedgehog [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>-3]
[13:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-string-qq [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.0.4-2]
[13:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-versions [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [5.0.3-3]
[13:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-clash-prelude [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [1.6.3-2]
[13:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hedgehog-classes [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>-2]
[13:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-kvitable [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>-2]
[13:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-versions [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed) [5.0.3-3]
[13:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-clash-prelude [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [1.6.3-2]
[13:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-versions [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [5.0.3-3]
[13:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hindent [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed) [5.3.4-1]
[13:43] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks|
[13:44] <LocutusOfBorg> I'll kick some rebuilds, expect haskell-what4 haskell-parameterized-utils haskell-zenc haskell-tasty-checklist haskell-bv-sized  to produce new binaries
[13:46] <LocutusOfBorg> and some haskell-clash-prelude on armhf and riscv64 :(
[13:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-hedgehog-classes [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [<IP_ADDRESS>-2] (no packageset)
[13:55] <LocutusOfBorg> sil2100, ^^ please
[14:33] <arraybolt3[m]> I see that it looks like the focal.5 RC ISOs are probably going to hit today (the entry has appeared on the website), should I expect a ping to land in #ubuntu-flavors when they're ready, or should I keep periodically checking the website? (I don't know if the way we did it for jammy.1 was special or not.)
[14:33] <arraybolt3[m]> s/the website/iso.qa.ubuntu.com/
[14:46] <blackboxsw> sil2100: if you have time today: cloud-init has an SRU in the unapproved upload for -proposed B, F and J series. Thursday RAOF caught that we had missed a postinst that was released in a hot fix branch and Steve suggested we update our wiki page to more clearly document when SRU bug 'TODO's are expected.  We have fixed the postinst/d/changelog and wiki pages per the request. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1987318.
[14:47] <blackboxsw> our SRU wiki page changes mere to better preface TODO-PRIOR-TO-PROPOSED vs. TODO-SRU-VERIFICATION   https://wiki.ubuntu.com/CloudinitUpdates?action=diff&rev1=13&rev2=14
[14:47] <blackboxsw> *WIKI page change were*
[15:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-hedgehog-classes [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>-2]
[15:30] <sil2100> blackboxsw: hm, I'll try to take a look, but I need to do some 20.04.5 work in a moment o/
[15:31] <sil2100> Everyone! I'll be kicking off 20.04.5 RCs in the next hour or so!
[15:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: grub2-signed (jammy-proposed/main) [1.180 => 1.182~22.04.1] (core) (sync)
[15:44] <vorlon> someone seems to be really keen on retrying haskell-text-format builds
[15:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-zenc [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.1.2-2] (no packageset)
[15:46] <Odd_Bloke> They must not understand it has side effects. =(
[15:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-parameterized-utils [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [<IP_ADDRESS>-2] (no packageset)
[15:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-zenc [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.1.2-2] (no packageset)
[15:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-zenc [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.1.2-2] (no packageset)
[15:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-parameterized-utils [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [<IP_ADDRESS>-2] (no packageset)
[15:49] <LocutusOfBorg> indeed vorlon removed from the list
[15:49] <LocutusOfBorg> I have 31 packages on the list, including stuff that was "disappearing" from the tracker
[15:50] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: well, I've removed haskell-text-format from the archive, so between the two, I should stop getting emails soon ;)
[15:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-zenc [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.1.2-2] (no packageset)
[15:50] <LocutusOfBorg> stuff like bnfc was not building at all
[15:51] <LocutusOfBorg> and I'm trying to bootstrap the above  binaries ^^ zenc/what4 and so on
[15:51] <LocutusOfBorg> sorry for the email spam, I removed it this morning (text format) from the list, due to the Debian rc bug
[15:52] <LocutusOfBorg> in the afternoon I found that many haskells were needing rebuilds, so I did a mass rebuild and grepped for "done" string, and checked manually them
[15:52] <LocutusOfBorg> (the list is 31 packages)
[15:52] <LocutusOfBorg> 30 now
[15:53] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: ruby-uglifier: you say it's affected by the Debian ftbfs bug but it does not show up on https://people.canonical.com/~ginggs/ftbfs-report/test-rebuild-20220617-kinetic-kinetic.html as broken in Ubuntu
[15:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-parameterized-utils [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [<IP_ADDRESS>-2] (no packageset)
[15:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-zenc [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [0.1.2-2] (no packageset)
[15:53] <vorlon> I can reproduce the build failure in -proposed
[15:54] <LocutusOfBorg> in june we had an old nodejs :)
[15:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-parameterized-utils [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>-2]
[15:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-parameterized-utils [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>-2]
[15:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-zenc [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [0.1.2-2]
[15:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-zenc [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [0.1.2-2]
[15:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-parameterized-utils [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>-2]
[15:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-zenc [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [0.1.2-2]
[15:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-zenc [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.1.2-2]
[15:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-zenc [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [0.1.2-2]
[15:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qt6-datavis3d [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [6.3.1-3]
[15:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qt6-datavis3d [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [6.3.1-3]
[15:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qt6-datavis3d [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [6.3.1-3]
[15:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qt6-datavis3d [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [6.3.1-3]
[15:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qt6-datavis3d [riscv64] (kinetic-proposed) [6.3.1-3]
[15:54] <LocutusOfBorg> we kept old nodejs around for too much time due to FTBFS in proposed (sigh openssl)
[15:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qt6-datavis3d [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [6.3.1-3]
[15:55] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: ah so it has now regressed in release
[15:55] <LocutusOfBorg> maybe its not nodejs that broke it, but I guess its him
[15:56] <LocutusOfBorg> and the alternative ruby-terser exists
[15:56] <LocutusOfBorg> and almost everything already did switch to it
[15:56] <vorlon> ok
[15:57] <LocutusOfBorg> e.g. https://github.com/diaspora/diaspora/pull/8268
[15:58] <LocutusOfBorg> btw moment-timezone.js is BD-waiting for new timezone
[15:58] <LocutusOfBorg> is anybody looking at it? I can try to merge it if needed
[15:58] <LocutusOfBorg> Missing build dependencies: tzdata (>= 2022c)
[15:58] <LocutusOfBorg> bdmurray, ^^
[15:59] <vorlon> yes, someone is working on it, I think schopin
[15:59] <LocutusOfBorg> oh I just pinged last uploader :)
[15:59] <LocutusOfBorg> so schopin please retry moment-timezone.js when possible :)
[16:00] <vorlon> (confirmed, it's schopin)
[16:02] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks
[16:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop amd64 [Focal 20.04.5] (20220829) has been added
[16:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop amd64 [Focal 20.04.5] (20220829.1) has been added
[16:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Focal 20.04.5] (20220829) has been added
[16:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop amd64 [Focal 20.04.5] (20220829.1) has been added
[16:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Budgie Desktop amd64 [Focal 20.04.5] (20220829) has been added
[16:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-bv-sized [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.0.4-2] (no packageset)
[16:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-bv-sized [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.0.4-2] (no packageset)
[16:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-tasty-checklist [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [<IP_ADDRESS>-2] (no packageset)
[16:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-bv-sized [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.0.4-2] (no packageset)
[16:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-tasty-checklist [s390x] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [<IP_ADDRESS>-2] (no packageset)
[16:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-tasty-checklist [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [<IP_ADDRESS>-2] (no packageset)
[16:30] <tsimonq2> ubuntu-sru: Hi, this isn't a nag necessarily but I'd like to ask (for $dayjob's sake) if bug 1882279 will be released to updates prior to Wednesday US EOD. If you think it needs another verification, please do ping me directly (so I can get paid to do it ;)) thanks!
[16:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [Focal 20.04.5] (20220829.1) has been added
[16:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop amd64 [Focal 20.04.5] (20220829.1) has been added
[16:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Focal 20.04.5] (20220829) has been added
[16:37] <athos> tsimonq2: feel free to perform any additional verifications in there :) Although I have already marked that as verified, any additional testing would be helpful there, specially if you have access to x86_64 v1 hardware :)
[16:39] <athos> regarding the release schedule, it was accepted in proposed on Aug. 25th, therefore, I don't believe it will land in updates before Sep 1st (Thursday)
[16:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity amd64 [Focal 20.04.5] (20220829.1) has been added
[16:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity arm64 [Focal 20.04.5] (20220829.1) has been added
[16:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity ppc64el [Focal 20.04.5] (20220829.1) has been added
[16:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server Subiquity s390x [Focal 20.04.5] (20220829.1) has been added
[17:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-tasty-checklist [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [<IP_ADDRESS>-2] (no packageset)
[17:01] <blackboxsw> sil2100: please rejecet the cloud-init SRU review request. If you end up having time. Regression in netplan rendering discovered in some network v2 passthrough configs https://bugs.launchpad.net/subiquity/+bug/1986551
[17:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-bv-sized [arm64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.0.4-2] (no packageset)
[17:06] <enr0n> ubuntu-archive: Please take a look at bug 1988070 to remove sicherboot from kinetic. This is needed to allow systemd to migrate.
[17:07] <enr0n> juliank: FYSA ^
[17:31] <Eickmeyer[m]> Once again, bdmurray, sil2100, for some reason the Ubuntu Studio links on the ISO tracker for focal are wrong.
[17:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base amd64 [Focal 20.04.5] (20220829.1) has been added
[17:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base arm64 [Focal 20.04.5] (20220829.1) has been added
[17:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base armhf [Focal 20.04.5] (20220829.1) has been added
[17:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base ppc64el [Focal 20.04.5] (20220829.1) has been added
[17:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base riscv64 [Focal 20.04.5] (20220829.1) has been added
[17:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base s390x [Focal 20.04.5] (20220829.1) has been added
[18:03] <seb128> question to the iso tracker people, is there a way to kick a rebuild for a flavor with a ppa included? the desktop canary image has a ppa but when a build is started for the iso tracker the ppa isn't included
[18:26] <bdmurray> seb128: that's not the behavior I would have expected. sil2100 might have understand how the rebuild kicking works.
[18:42] <fossfreedom> bdmurray: sil2100 quick question of the contents of the Ubuntu Budgie 20.04.5 iso .... in the .list file I see lots of kernel 5.13  .deb files. Is this expected given that 5.15 is the default kernel now?
[18:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64+raspi [Focal 20.04.5] (20220829.1) has been added
[18:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server armhf+raspi [Focal 20.04.5] (20220829.1) has been added
[18:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+unleashed [Focal 20.04.5] (20220829.1) has been added
[18:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server riscv64+unmatched [Focal 20.04.5] (20220829.1) has been added
[18:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-tasty-checklist [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [<IP_ADDRESS>-2] (no packageset)
[19:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-bv-sized [armhf] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.0.4-2] (no packageset)
[19:04] <Renato> hello
[19:30] <arraybolt3[m]> sil2100: I am so sorry to report this, but I just found a critical bug in Ubuntu Desktop 20.04.5. It appears that installing proprietary WiFi drivers fails silently, meaning that an installed system with a Broadcom Wi-Fi card has no Wi-Fi after installation, despire the fact that Wi-Fi was working in the live environment.
[19:30] <arraybolt3[m]> Specific steps to reproduce:
[19:31] <arraybolt3[m]> 1: Boot Ubuntu 20.04.5. 2: Launch Ubiquity. 3: When you get to the screen where you are allowed to select whether you want to install proprietary drivers or not, check the box, then go to the next screen. 3: When the screen advances, go back to the last screen. 4: Connect to Wi-Fi (which will be available now). 5: Check the box to install updates, and leave the proprietary drivers box checked. 6: Finish installation.
[19:31] <arraybolt3[m]> If you do this on a system with a Broadcom Wi-Fi chip, the installed system will have no Wi-Fi connectivity when complete.
[19:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-bv-sized [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [1.0.4-2]
[19:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-bv-sized [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [1.0.4-2]
[19:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-tasty-checklist [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>-2]
[19:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-tasty-checklist [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>-2]
[19:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-tasty-checklist [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>-2]
[19:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-bv-sized [armhf] (kinetic-proposed) [1.0.4-2]
[19:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-tasty-checklist [arm64] (kinetic-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>-2]
[19:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-bv-sized [s390x] (kinetic-proposed) [1.0.4-2]
[19:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-tasty-checklist [ppc64el] (kinetic-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>-2]
[19:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted haskell-bv-sized [amd64] (kinetic-proposed) [1.0.4-2]
[19:32] <arraybolt3[m]> I'm going to try a slightly different installation approach to see if maybe it's Ubiquity getting confused somehow.
[19:33] <arraybolt3[m]> (Also, I checked the sha256sum of the ISO, and I have experienced this same problem occur on both Ubuntu Desktop and Ubuntu Studio 20.04.5.)
[19:35] <arraybolt3[m]> Oh, also, I clicked "Try Ubuntu" and then launched Ubiquity in that.
[19:45] <arraybolt3[m]> OK, I just noticed something interesting. If I *don't* go back to the screen where I can check the "Download updates" box after getting WiFi running, but instead just proceed with the installation without installing updates, then my Wi-Fi works.
[19:47] <arraybolt3[m]> And there aren't any updates to be installed, so I guess this is a UI problem with Ubiquity somehow?
[19:58] <vorlon> enr0n: sorted, cheers
[20:38] <enr0n> vorlon: thanks!
[20:46] <teward> reminder: do I need an FFe to just fix a bug in a package?  No feature changes, but a bugfix from upstream in a python file?
[20:46] <teward> (not a python lib)
[20:46] <teward> it's been a while since i did a bug fix during freeze that wasn't me sponsoring for the Security team heh
[20:49] <vorlon> teward: no
[20:50] <teward> vorlon: ack, that's what i thought but didn't want to step on toes :)
[20:51] <teward> *goes to make more coffee now that the power isn't flickering*
[20:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: torbrowser-launcher (jammy-proposed/universe) [0.3.3-6ubuntu1 => 0.3.3-6ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>] (no packageset)
[21:00] <teward> vorlon: ^^ that's an SRU, the bug is the same as the bug referenced in the Kinetic upload to fix the same bug (not shown here because it was just Accepted)
[21:00] <teward> no rush but that's why i was asking :)
[21:00] <teward> thank you for the info confirm again :0
[21:01] <luis220413> +1
[21:02] <teward[m]> luis220413 unnecessary +1 is unnecessary and just noise, remember that 'random noise' is not smiled upon
[21:04] <luis220413> Sorry. I wanted to say that I just checked the differences and they were OK. It is always good to have someone else's look over your changes.
[21:07] <teward> luis220413: i'm a seasoned dev, and since you are not on the SRU team, your +1 is noise.
[21:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: haskell-what4 [amd64] (kinetic-proposed/universe) [1.3-2] (no packageset)
[21:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: caja-extensions (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.26.0-1 => 1.26.0-1ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>] (ubuntu-mate)
[21:24] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, haskell-yesod-auth-oauth... kick it out?
[21:28] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: looks correct.  I'll follow through on it this afternoon
[21:29] <LocutusOfBorg> ta
[22:08] <arraybolt3[m]> sil2100: Ping regarding the bug in Ubuntu Desktop described in my previous messages (just in case you missed it, if not then disregard this ping)
[22:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gallery-dl (focal-backports/universe) [1.22.4-1~bpo20.04.1 => 1.23.0-1~bpo20.04.1] (no packageset)
[22:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gallery-dl (jammy-backports/universe) [1.22.4-1~bpo22.04.1 => 1.23.0-1~bpo22.04.1] (no packageset)
[23:38] <arraybolt3[m]> Bug report for Wi-Fi driver install problem: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/1988101
[23:44] <sarnold> heh, "go back and change this" feels like it breaks something every few years


[06:13] <mtaylor> hey ho - launchpad is rejecting packages from my ppa with the error: Unable to find source package drizzle/2010.09.1802-1.3~lucid01 in lucid
[06:17] <wgrant> mtaylor: Is that in a build's upload log?
[06:17] <mtaylor> wgrant: I got that in an email just now
[06:17] <wgrant> mtaylor: From a build? or a source upload?
[06:18] <mtaylor> I'm going to say a build ... hrm.
[06:19] <wgrant> If it was a build, can you link me to it?
[06:19] <mtaylor> wgrant: look like perhaps 2010.09.1802-1.3~lucid01 was doing something and 2010.09.1802-1.4~lucid01 got uploaded...
[06:19] <mtaylor> lemme find a link
[06:20] <wgrant> mtaylor: That would do it, yes.
[06:20] <mtaylor> ok. the message was just a little disturbing
[09:19] <LinuxJedi> timeouts whilst filing bugs :( "(Error ID: OOPS-1736F673)"
[09:23] <bilalakhtar> I am also dacing similar problems
[09:24] <bilalakhtar> *facing
[09:24] <bilalakhtar> (Error ID: OOPS-1736ED371)
[09:24] <wgrant> bilalakhtar, LinuxJedi: Filing bugs with apport?
[09:25] <wgrant> Against which package? linux?
[09:25] <bilalakhtar> wgrant: I get this when I go to the ubuntu +bugs url
[09:25] <bilalakhtar> https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs
[09:25] <bilalakhtar> wgrant: 6^
[09:25] <bilalakhtar> *^^
[09:25] <LinuxJedi> wgrant: no, launchpad website against the drizzle project.  Just started working again now though
[09:25] <bilalakhtar> wgrant: Can you access the OOPS thing?
[09:25] <bilalakhtar> wgrant: Working now for me as well!
[09:26] <wgrant> bilalakhtar: No, unfortunately.
[09:26] <wgrant> It does still seem a bit sluggish.
[09:27] <bilalakhtar> wgrant: I think only members of ~launchpad can access
[09:27] <LinuxJedi> would be nice if I didn't have to file bugs, with this beta release of drizzle people are find client side bugs faster than I can fix them ;)
[09:28] <wgrant> bilalakhtar: It's somewhat wider than that.
[09:28] <wgrant> Possibly anyone in ~canonical.
[14:18] <sladen> spam on Launchpad, can somebody delete/block:  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/653473/comments/2
[14:41] <nigelb> sladen: might help opening a question since its the weekend and there is no chr :)
[14:56]  * sladen ponders and tries to work out how to format that as a question
[14:56] <sladen> https://answers.launchpad.net/malone/+question/127676
[15:29] <nigelb> sladen: heh, you ended up quoting me for the question :)
[15:51] <seiflotfy> guys i need ur help
[15:51] <seiflotfy> i accedentaly set the wrong person as a miantainer of a project
[15:51] <seiflotfy> and now i cant change it back
[15:52] <seiflotfy> i just created the launchpad project http://launchpad.net/trophylicious
[15:52]  * sladen suspects the answer will be "file a +question"...
[15:52] <nigelb> seiflotfy: being a weekend, I don't think there are folks around.  You'd bnefit from asking a question :)
[15:52] <nigelb> sladen: heh
[15:53]  * nigelb highlights that he doesn't work on LP at all, but just likes to help :)
[17:56] <mtaylor> I'm getting errors in a PPA about it being full - but when I try to go delete superseeded packages, they don't show up as eligible for deletion
[17:57] <LinuxJedi> mtaylor: :(
[17:58] <mtaylor> LinuxJedi: :) ... I have filed a question
[17:58] <LinuxJedi> cool :)
[18:47] <shadeslayer> mtaylor: maybe wait for a few mins for lp to actually delete the packages?
[18:48] <mtaylor> shadeslayer: it never gave me the option to mark them for deletion
[18:48] <shadeslayer> oic ..
[18:57] <rajee> hai
[18:58] <rajee> im unable to add PPA to my system
[18:58] <rajee> receiving error as 'Error: can't find signing_key_fingerprint'
[18:59] <rajee> need help
[21:04] <mtaylor> is there any way to submit new bugs via email with launchpad?
[21:18] <geser> mtaylor: yes, see the LP page about the email interface
[21:19] <geser> mtaylor: https://help.launchpad.net/Bugs/EmailInterface
[21:21] <mtaylor> geser: heh. perhaps I should look at docs more often than just bugging folks in here :) thanks!
[22:59] <paissad_> guys, would like to upload my package to https://launchpad.net/~paissad/+archive/pms-linux
[23:00] <paissad_> i did ' dput ppa:paissad/ppa *.changes'
[23:01] <paissad_> here is the logfile after dput -> http://pastebin.com/Q3jwVMjK
[23:03] <paissad_> but i receive a mail noticing a failure
[23:05] <paissad> Rejected:
[23:05] <paissad> Launchpad failed to process the upload path '~paissad/ppa/ubuntu':
[23:05] <paissad> Could not find a PPA named 'ppa' for 'paissad'.
[23:05] <kklimonda> paissad: it should be dput ppa:paissad/pms-linux *.changes
[23:05] <paissad_> ok, thanks
[23:31] <paissad> [PPA paissad-pms-linux] [ubuntu/lucid] pms-linux	1.20.409+svn411-0ubuntu1 (Accepted)
[23:31] <paissad> thanks !
[23:36] <paissad> must i do the upload for maverick too ? ...
[23:36] <paissad> i think about changing the debian/changelog file & replace lucid by maverick & the re-run dput ...


[18:10] <metaphysician> In 14.04, there is a bug in /usr/lib/pm-utils/power.d/wireless script at line 23. It should "enabled" at the end of path /sys/class/net/$1/device/enable. Wireless power saving lying unutilized
[18:11] <metaphysician> I always get an ENOENT error in /var/log/pm-powersave.log when that hook runs, inspite of active wlan0.