[04:27] <pitti> Good morning
[06:02] <RAOF> pitti: Yo!
[06:03] <pitti> hey RAOF, how are you?
[06:03] <RAOF> Tired!
[06:03] <RAOF> But otherwise well :)
[07:03] <didrocks> good morning
[07:09] <pitti> bonjour didrocks
[08:06] <tkamppeter> ogra_, you asked me yesterday which release I am running on my Pandaboard. It is Precise with http://ppa.launchpad.net/tiomap-dev/release/ubuntu PPA and priority given to PPA packages.
[08:07] <tkamppeter> ogra_, XBMC is 2:11.0+16+201207280746~precise1.
[08:36] <thumper> hi didrocks
[08:37] <didrocks> hey thumper
[08:39] <thumper> didrocks: do we have a new compiz/unity planned soon for raring?
[08:39] <didrocks> thumper: when the autopilot tests will pass and every components will build
[08:39] <didrocks> thumper: the daily will then copy it
[08:39] <didrocks> why?
[08:39] <thumper> didrocks: because I'd like to get off metacity :)
[08:39] <didrocks> thumper: well, go back to raring distro first
[08:39] <thumper> how?
[08:39] <didrocks> remove your ppa and downgrade the components
[08:40] <thumper> I have removed the ppas
[08:40] <thumper> and downgraded compiz
[08:40] <thumper> but not sure about the rest
[08:40] <thumper> compiz seems to get stuck initializeing core
[08:40] <didrocks> thumper: maybe try to remove your compiz config? if it spelled garbage?
[08:40] <thumper> didrocks: where is that?
[08:40] <didrocks> thumper: come on, you worked on that :/
[08:41] <didrocks> .config/compiz*
[08:41] <thumper> not really
[08:41] <didrocks> and .compiz*
[08:41] <thumper> kk
[08:41] <didrocks> thumper: also, you can ask upstream, you know, you used an upstream ppa :p
[08:41]  * thumper tries
[08:41] <thumper> :P
[08:41] <didrocks> thumper: now, jason believes that raring is broken because of the email
[08:41] <didrocks> despite me explaining :/
[08:41] <thumper> I replied ...
[08:41] <didrocks> tech people should always check first what they installed
[08:41] <thumper> sorry
[08:41] <thumper> my bad
[08:42] <didrocks> thumper: yeah, seems it wasn't clear enough after what I was told yesterday…
[08:46] <thumper> :(
[08:46] <thumper> removed all compiz config, and downgraded unity and 3 others to raring packages
[08:47] <thumper> and compiz still freezes on core
[08:47]  * thumper sighs
[08:48] <didrocks> smspillaz: ^
[08:48] <didrocks> thumper: you should still have a leftover somewhere
[08:48] <thumper> didrocks: probably...
[08:48] <didrocks> thumper: nobody reported it on the distro, so clearly linked to that
[08:48] <didrocks> I think sil2100 as well tracked that ^
[08:48] <thumper> good
[09:15] <Laney> morning ;-)
[09:17] <chrisccoulson> hi Laney
[09:18] <Laney> hey
[09:18]  * Laney is sniffling lots
[09:22] <seb128> hey Laney chrisccoulson, how are you?
[09:25] <chrisccoulson> hi seb128. i'm not too bad thanks, how are you?
[09:25]  * chrisccoulson is also sniffling lits
[09:25] <Laney> didn't have such a good nights sleep because of it, but not too bad
[09:26] <czajkowski> morning
[09:32] <seb128> chrisccoulson, I'm good thanks
[09:32] <seb128> czajkowski, good morning!
[09:32] <seb128> I managed to fight back the sneezing so far
[09:32] <seb128> but I had a start of a running nose and it was close
[09:32] <seb128> still not calling victory but I'm ok so far
[09:34] <BigWhale> Greetings everyone.
[09:34] <seb128> BigWhale, hey, how are you?
[09:34] <BigWhale> Finally better!
[09:34] <BigWhale> Thanks.
[09:36] <czajkowski> I've played with chickens so far this morning
[09:36] <czajkowski> still no eggs :(
[09:36] <czajkowski> noisey nosiey things though
[09:37] <seb128> czajkowski, you got chickens?
[09:38] <seb128> czajkowski, what kind of game is that? does it run on ubuntu? :p
[09:38] <BigWhale> :D
[09:38] <czajkowski> seb128: https://plus.google.com/photos/102921374554385564572/albums/5848623031635547409
[09:38] <BigWhale> I am more curious why does she has to play with them to get eggs... ;)
[09:39] <czajkowski> we also have  a cam hooked up so we can check on them
[09:39] <seb128> czajkowski, oh, you got the real thing
[09:39] <czajkowski> BigWhale: I really want a fried egg!
[09:39] <seb128> nice ;-)
[09:39] <BigWhale> Even chickens aren't what they used to be!
[09:39] <czajkowski> so we didnt buy any at the weekend, and so far the hens have not laid one
[09:39] <chrisccoulson> czajkowski, it would be awesome if they just laid a fried egg for you
[09:40] <BigWhale> Fried egg? Straight from chickens? That would be something. :))
[09:40] <czajkowski> chrisccoulson: still be needing the lee and perns though
[09:40] <chrisccoulson> hah
[09:41] <czajkowski> if chickens start laying fried eggs, I demand to be able to shave off strips of crispy bacon from pigs :)
[09:41] <BigWhale> Cat on a hot tin roof should really be chicken on a hot tin roof ...
[09:42] <BigWhale> czajkowski, btw, Google+ is mocking me. I clicked on a picture of your chickens and it asked me if I want to find my face ... :D
[09:43] <czajkowski> LOL
[09:44] <BigWhale> Yeah, not to me! ;))
[09:44]  * hyperair +1's that.
[10:26] <dholbach> hiya
[10:27] <dholbach> did anyone hear of anything which would open "https://www.facebook.com/connect/login_success.html?........" in my web browser in a new tab every 10 minutes?
[10:27] <dholbach> could it be gwibber trying to authenticate to a FB account?
[10:27] <seb128> dholbach, hey, does it happen without action from your part? like if you go for lunch an hour do you have a bunch of tabs when coming back?
[10:27] <dholbach> yes
[10:28] <dholbach> like every 10-20 minutes - I don't know
[10:28] <dholbach> and the website I get on just says "Success"
[10:28] <seb128> weird
[10:28] <seb128> do you have the gwibber client open all the time?
[10:28] <seb128> like the ui on screen?
[10:29] <dholbach> hang on
[10:30] <dholbach> seb128, http://people.canonical.com/~dholbach/screenshot.png
[10:30] <dholbach> that's what I get in g-o-a
[10:30] <dholbach> so something is broken
[10:30] <seb128> dholbach, u-o-a (that's the ubuntu one), seems so
[10:31] <dholbach> ah, u-o-a
[10:31] <seb128> dholbach, let's try asking the webapp guys
[10:44]  * Laney wonders if unity's edge resistance became more sticky in the past week
[10:44] <Laney> I have to hit the edge quite hard to get across monitors now
[10:46]  * ogra_ was always wondering why people use that feature ... i find it quite distrurbing in my workflow
[10:47] <seb128> without it, it's almost impossible to hit the right edge of the left screen
[10:47] <seb128> e.g to use a scrollbar
[10:47] <seb128> same for using the launcher on the right screen
[10:47] <Laney> also raising the auto-hidden launcher is hard now
[10:47] <Laney> on the left screen
[10:47] <seb128> too easy  to overshot and end on the left one
[10:47] <marga> Heys... I'm trying to develop my own indicator, and I'm puzzled by the icon stuff.  I was planning on adding my own icons, is that possible?
[10:48] <seb128> marga, hey, you sure can
[10:48] <marga> but I need to add them to the themes, is that correct?
[10:48] <seb128> it's the usual/recommended way
[10:48] <seb128> well "the themes"
[10:49] <seb128> you can have a /usr/share/<yourapp>/icons/hicolor
[10:49] <seb128> which is a private "overlay" to the theme for your app
[10:50] <seb128> if the icons are only to be used there
[10:50] <seb128> lot of apps do that
[10:50] <seb128> e.g eog or notify-osd or gwibber
[10:51] <seb128> or you can manually load an image for somewhere as well
[10:52] <marga> ok.
[10:52] <seb128> marga, typically if you add a private hicolor dir you want to add that directory using http://developer.gnome.org/gtk3/stable/GtkIconTheme.html#gtk-icon-theme-append-search-path
[10:53] <marga> no, according to the docs you can't manually load images for the indicator
[10:53] <seb128> notify-osd does
[10:53] <seb128>         gtk_icon_theme_append_search_path(gtk_icon_theme_get_default(),
[10:53] <seb128>                                           ICONS_DIR);
[10:53] <marga> ah, right
[10:53] <marga> I was now searching through the available themes to see if I could find a set of icons that could fit
[10:53] <marga> but browsing the icons is really hard, there are tons
[10:56] <seb128> marga, wget https://launchpad.net/icon-library/trunk/lucid-release/+download/iconlibrary02052010.tar.gz; tar xf iconlibrary02052010.tar.gz; cd iconlibrary;   python icon-library.py
[10:56] <marga> lucid?
[10:57] <seb128> marga, that's a small python app , it didn't change since then but it's very handy and still works fine
[10:57] <marga> ok, thanks, I've downloaded it :)
[10:57] <seb128> marga, should help you to browse the installed icons
[10:57] <marga> yes, looks really nice
[10:57] <marga> why isn't it shipped with ubuntu?
[10:58] <seb128> nobody took the time to package it I guess
[10:58] <seb128> we should ;-)
[10:58] <marga> heh
[11:39] <chrisccoulson> seb128, did you upgrade firefox from the beta PPA yet?
[11:40] <seb128> ii  firefox                                                     20.0~b1+build2-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>~mfn3       i386         Safe and easy web browser from Mozilla
[11:40] <seb128> chrisccoulson, is what I'm running
[11:40] <seb128> chrisccoulson, anything special you want feedback on?
[11:41] <chrisccoulson> seb128, no, as long as it's working ok. it's got a fix for https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=844015 in, i just want to make sure it's not broken before i prepare new stable versions :)
[11:41] <ubot2> Mozilla bug 844015 in ImageLib "crash in imgRequestProxy::UnblockOnload" [Critical,New]
[11:42] <chrisccoulson> thanks!
[11:42] <seb128> chrisccoulson, works fine so far, including french translations! ;-)
[11:42] <seb128> chrisccoulson, yw
[11:42] <chrisccoulson> heh, that's good
[11:46] <gema> seb128: have you had the chance to have a look at bug 1091708?
[11:46] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1091708 in The Ubuntu Boot Speed Project "bootchart sometimes doesn't generate all times when annotating" [High,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1091708
[11:46] <gema> seb128: it is making bootspeed testing unstable
[11:47] <seb128> gema, looking to the xsession-errors it seems like xorg is hitting a bug/segfault/something
[11:47] <gema> seb128: ok, so what do you suggest we do?
[11:48] <seb128> gema, I've commented on the bug, would be useful to get the xorg logs when running into the issue
[11:48] <gema> seb128: if it is an xorg bug, what would be the next step?
[11:49] <seb128> gema, getting a log when it happens (that's what I asked for on the bug) and then give it to our xorg team when we have enough infos so they can have a look at fixing it
[11:49] <gema> seb128: ack
[11:54] <Laney> do we have to manually set Depends for QML stuff currently?
[11:55] <seb128> Mirv, didrocks: ^ do you know?
[11:55] <seb128> Laney, I don't know of any :Depends magic for it
[11:55] <didrocks> Laney: yeah, you do need
[11:55] <didrocks> there is not helper
[11:55] <didrocks> no*
[11:55] <Laney> hmm
[11:55] <Laney> do you have a good way of doing it?
[11:56] <didrocks> Laney: grep the imports :p
[11:56] <Laney> I suppose "g.. yeah that
[11:56] <didrocks> ;)
[11:56] <Laney> what's the search directory to look in?
[11:56] <Laney> to map those back to packages
[11:58] <didrocks> Laney: I think it's /usr/lib/*/qt4/imports/
[11:58] <didrocks> and subdirs (qmldir/)
[11:58] <didrocks> sorry, same with qt5 ;)
[11:58] <Laney> heh
[11:58] <didrocks> but with that, you won't catch the false qml import, binding to C++ code
[11:58] <Laney> this is (currently) still qt4
[11:58] <Laney> import QtQuick 1.1
[12:00] <Mirv> libqt4-declarative in Qt4
[12:00] <didrocks> Mirv: that doesn't fix if you import modules not in the base package
[12:01] <Mirv> in qt4 the special packages are libqt4-declarative-folderlistmodel/gestures/particles/shaders
[12:02] <Mirv> didrocks: yes, I guess there is no simple way
[12:32] <chrisccoulson> i'm getting used to chromiums build system now
[12:32] <Laney> is it a thing of beauty?
[12:33] <chrisccoulson> Laney, it's ok. it's hard to describe any build system as a thing of beauty though
[12:33] <chrisccoulson> more like, "it doesn't completely suck" ;)
[12:33] <czajkowski> or break
[12:34] <czajkowski> in your case don't take a mallet to it
[12:34] <Laney> autotools and i have come to some kind of violent understanding
[12:34] <czajkowski> Laney: in your books is that a tight hug of some sort
[12:34] <czajkowski> I cant imagine you ever being violent
[12:35] <chrisccoulson> autotools is designed from the ground up to make your life as miserable as possible
[12:35] <mlankhorst> chrisccoulson: yes but the important part is it does it in a consistent way across all packages
[12:35] <mlankhorst> and people forget that about autotools
[12:35] <chrisccoulson> hah
[12:35] <chrisccoulson> that's true
[12:35] <mlankhorst> and as a packager it's rather a nice property to have
[12:35] <Laney> dh_weep
[12:36] <chrisccoulson> lol
[13:35] <BigWhale> chrisccoulson, please be nice to autotools, they help drive business of many pharmaceutical companies. That's gotta count for something. :>
[13:35] <BigWhale> autotools and sendmail ...
[13:37] <qengho> chrisccoulson: yeah, GYP is not terrible.
[13:38] <qengho> AFK for drive to cafe.  brb.
[13:44] <chrisccoulson> le sigh
[13:44] <chrisccoulson> so, i've got chromium starting on my pandaboard now with the linker fix, and a couple of other fixes
[13:45] <chrisccoulson> but the renderer crashes on startup!
[13:45] <chrisccoulson> yippee!
[13:45] <seb128> :-(
[13:45] <chrisccoulson> this is so much fun ;)
[13:46] <seb128> chrisccoulson, fsvof
[13:52] <chrisccoulson> i blame mdeslaur :P
[13:52] <chrisccoulson> it's all because we make it relocatable ;)
[13:52] <seb128> hehe
[13:53] <mdeslaur> chrisccoulson: welcome to 2008!
[13:54] <chrisccoulson> lol
[14:03] <smspillaz> thumper: virtualbox ?
[14:03] <smspillaz> thumper: I've given up on that tbh
[14:03] <smspillaz> the driver situation is just such a bloody disaster
[14:05] <smspillaz> didrocks: :(
[14:05] <smspillaz> didrocks: the situation in a nutshell: the steps required to fix it on one commonly used driver will basically break another commonly used driver
[14:05] <smspillaz> and vice versa
[14:06] <smspillaz> its madness
[14:07] <smspillaz> thumper: didrocks: our best bet really is to just get it fixed inside virtualbox https://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/11503
[14:17] <attente> ls
[14:26] <czajkowski> davmor2: any ideas on how to get my precise 32 VM working have done more updates but still being a large pita
[14:28] <davmor2> czajkowski: read above I believe the comments above cover it
[14:29] <czajkowski> ah same issue they are referring to
[14:29] <czajkowski> bugger
[14:29] <davmor2> czajkowski: language
[14:47] <ritz_> seb128 thank you :)
[14:51] <dobey> xnox: ping
[14:51] <xnox> dobey: hola =)
[14:52] <dobey> xnox: hi! it seems that the tomboy changes i proposed weren't uploaded to precise-proposed, though the MP was set to merged?
[14:52] <dobey> oh
[14:52] <Laney> sure they were https://launchpadlibrarian.net/130509506/tomboy_1.10.1-0ubuntu2_source.changes
[14:52] <dobey> maybe i should ping didrocks and/or pitti about that.
[14:52] <Laney> #ubuntu-release is good
[14:53] <dobey> Laney: huh. why is it not listed on https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tomboy then?
[14:53] <Laney> it's in the upload queue
[14:53] <Laney> you won't see it there until it's accepted
[14:53] <dobey> oh
[14:53] <xnox> Laney: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/precise/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=tomboy
[14:53] <dobey> Laney: can you accept it?
[14:53] <xnox> dobey: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/precise/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=tomboy
[14:53] <Laney> nope
[14:54] <Laney> ask in the aforementioned channel
[14:54] <xnox> dobey: you can get to the queues on launchpad.net/ubuntu/$series somewhere on the right column.
[15:17] <Sweetshark> seb128: hmm, so my little mspub build now passes this to the compiles: http://paste.ubuntu.com/5567844/ -- still I get a fortify lintian warning. Can I safely assume it to be a false positive then and override it?
[15:38] <Laney> dobey: did you see that didrocks asked you to look at bug #926763?
[15:38] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 926763 in software-center (Ubuntu) "Cannot install local packages (.deb files) without network connection (offline)" [Medium,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/926763
[15:39] <didrocks> there was a ping on IRC as well :)
[15:39] <Laney> oho
[15:39] <dobey> Laney: no i didn't see that
[15:39] <Laney> :-)
[15:39] <Laney> there's proposed patches in there
[15:40] <seb128> Sweetshark, I hate that lintian warning
[15:40] <dobey> ++++ softwarecenter/ui/gtk3/views/appdetailsview.py.new2013-01-18 13:55:46.016390022 +0530
[15:40] <dobey> looks like a broken patch :)
[15:41] <seb128> Sweetshark, blame it on the security guys for having buggy warnings :p
[15:41] <seb128> jdstrand, mdeslaur: do we have a list somewhere of the functions covered by fortify? how do you determine false positives?
[15:42] <Sweetshark> seb128: I have to have a leg to stand on for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libmspub/+bug/1124082/comments/11 but I guess the compiler line is that.
[15:42] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1124082 in libmspub "[MIR] libmspub" [Undecided,Incomplete]
[15:42] <seb128> Sweetshark, when I checked harfbuzz I used the list in http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=673112#40 and verified than none of the function flagged there as "protected" were being used
[15:42] <ubot2> Debian bug 673112 in lintian "lintian: hardening-no-stackprotector check has many false positives" [Normal,Fixed]
[15:45] <dobey> Laney, didrocks: commented on the bug
[15:45] <mdeslaur> seb128: I have no idea...sbeattie would know more once he gets online
[15:45] <seb128> ok
[15:45] <seb128> mdeslaur, thanks
[15:45] <Laney> dobey: ok thanks, I'll remove sponsors and let you handle it from here ;-)
[15:46] <Laney> I think your comment about the CLA is bogus though as he is one... of... us...
[15:48] <chrisccoulson> it's totally awesome that the chromium renderer crashes with the program counter pointing to zero
[15:48] <chrisccoulson> another linker bug?
[15:48] <qengho> chrisccoulson, ain't technology grand?
[15:49] <chrisccoulson> qengho, heh :)
[15:49] <dobey> Laney: i didn't check to see if he was an employee or what. i was just making a general statement about contributions. too many employees to keep track of who is and isn't an employee any more.
[15:49] <Laney> I clicked on his page and saw the little purple circle
[15:49] <Laney> but yeah, sure
[15:51] <Sweetshark> seb128: that perl thingie find memcpy, memmove and memset and I only find memcpy in the source from some libtool voodoo
[15:52] <qengho> chrisccoulson: Could be a broken function pointer deref, but considering other arches are fine, more likely a linker bug.
[15:54] <Laney> jbicha: you ready for the cogl transition then?
[15:54] <Laney> . o O (what in the world is a stealth FTBFS?)
[16:00] <jbicha> Laney: yes, it FTBFS but no one had noticed yet
[16:01] <Laney> ok, looking
[16:03] <jbicha> maybe that's just a normal FTBFS but what I meant is that it wasn't cogl's fault
[16:04] <Laney> bah, watchfile not tracking unstable series
[16:04] <Laney> I assume you've been running your package for a bit without any problems
[16:09] <rickspencer3> hey didrocks
[16:17] <Laney> jbicha: you forgot to rename .install and .symbols
[16:18] <jbicha> Laney: I ran the raring+newcogl stack for a few hours on Saturday but then I upgraded back to the GNOME 3.7 PPAs
[16:19] <Laney> oh no you didn't, I screwed that up somehow
[16:19] <Laney> or patch didn't understand that, or whatever
[16:28] <didrocks> hey rickspencer3, sorry, was in a hangout
[16:28] <rickspencer3> no worries didrocks
[16:28] <didrocks> ok ;)
[16:28] <rickspencer3> I assigned you a bug, you can unassign it, reassign it
[16:29] <rickspencer3> I thought you might want to see it
[16:30] <seb128> hey
[16:30] <seb128> it's meeting time
[16:30] <didrocks> rickspencer3: thanks! I'll have a quick look. Most of the python3 port was done by barry, I'll probably just give him over to him :)
[16:30] <rickspencer3> didrocks, ack
[16:31] <rickspencer3> fwiw, it happens every day when I upgrade with update-manager
[16:31] <seb128> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DesktopTeam/Meeting/2013-02-26
[16:31] <seb128> we all saw each others last week
[16:31] <seb128> so I don't think we need to go around the team this week
[16:31]  * rickspencer3 backs away quietly
[16:31] <seb128> does anyone has a topic/something to discuss?
[16:32] <Laney> yeah I think I should postpone my WIs on https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/desktop-q-deprecate-language-selector until we move on with gsd etc - do you agree?
[16:33] <seb128> Laney, +1, I let them in case you wanted to look at bit more into it, but I don't see that happening any time soon
[16:33] <seb128> especially not until we resolve the new ibus situation
[16:33] <Laney> exactly
[16:34] <seb128> Laney, thanks ;-)
[16:34] <seb128> other topics?
[16:34] <seb128> ok, seems not, end of meeting
[16:34] <didrocks> nothing from me, reported everything on the notes
[16:34] <seb128> thanks everyone ;-)
[16:34] <didrocks> thanks everyone :)
[16:34] <cyphermox> thanks
[16:35] <jbicha> seb128: apparently ibus integration is nicer with g-s-d 3.7.90 but of course the new version has its own issues...
[16:36] <seb128> jbicha, well, base of the issue is ibus 1.5, not GNOME
[16:36] <seb128> jbicha, no GNOME update is going to magically fix ibus, especially not for !GNOME desktops
[16:37] <Sweetshark> seb128, the master of the three minute meeting!
[16:37] <chrisccoulson> oh, i missed the team meeting?
[16:37] <seb128> Sweetshark, german efficiency! ;-)
[16:37] <chrisccoulson> sorry, glued to pandaboard again today
[16:37] <seb128> chrisccoulson, we had a week long meeting so we made that one short
[16:37] <chrisccoulson> hi random_nickname
[16:37] <seb128> chrisccoulson, btw did you send your summary for last week? ;-)
[16:37] <jbicha> well per-window mode is back I believe
[16:37] <chrisccoulson> seb128, oh, i'll send it in a bit. sorry ;)
[16:37] <seb128> jbicha, btw please stop uploading GNOME 3.7 packages
[16:38] <seb128> chrisccoulson, thanks
[16:38] <chrisccoulson> who's mdeslaur trolling? ;)
[16:38] <seb128> jbicha, we decided to not go for unstable versions this cycle
[16:39] <jbicha> seb128: I was done; everything else is riskier
[16:39] <seb128> jbicha, we can decide on a case by case but 1- when 3.8 is released, e.g when those are stable and not beta, 2- with a team discussion first
[16:40] <seb128> jbicha, ok, I started seeing stuff like vinagre gnome-calculator etc, I was wondering how far you were planning to go
[16:40] <jbicha> seb128: I thought after GNOME freeze but before Ubuntu Feature Freeze was a good time
[16:41] <Laney> maybe we should wait with cogl then ...
[16:41] <jbicha> bug 1132119
[16:41] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1132119 in cogl (Ubuntu) "Upgrade to cogl 1.13.4" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1132119
[16:42] <seb128> Laney, cogl is fine
[16:42] <seb128> Laney, it's a stack part and mostly not impacting Unity
[16:43] <ricotz> seb128, hi, please grab this is you have time https://launchpad.net/~gnome3-team/+archive/gnome3-staging/+sourcepub/3000802/+listing-archive-extra
[16:43] <Laney> hmm ok
[16:43] <seb128> ricotz, thanks
[16:43] <seb128> Laney, well, my feeling, I prefer to have that transition out of the way early rather than late
[16:43] <Laney> yeah I don't mind taking it
[16:43] <Laney> especially if jbicha will do the work :-)
[16:43] <ricotz> +1 for cogl
[16:43] <seb128> Laney, it's fine to take a few hits, I just don't want to stack a tons of unstable versions and having no time to deal with the mess then
[16:44] <Laney> luckily I just finished looking at it
[16:44] <Laney> so ... uploaded
[16:44] <Laney> happy NEWing!
[16:46] <chrisccoulson> man, this is a pain
[16:47] <seb128> chrisccoulson, back to binutils?
[16:47] <ricotz> chrisccoulson, hi
[16:48] <chrisccoulson> seb128, not yet. this one crashes after main, and so i'm now battling with a lack of debug symbols (for some reason, the resulting chromium binary is missing some sections that are useful to gdb)
[16:48] <chrisccoulson> i need to figure out that first ;)
[16:48] <ricotz> chrisccoulson, please keep mozjs17 in mind which is suppose to get a release soon -- https://launchpad.net/~ricotz/+archive/testing/+sourcepub/2994775/+listing-archive-extra
[16:53] <qengho> Mine:
[16:53] <qengho> * sprinty things. Chromium cross-compiling with multiarch! Tiny android app work.
[16:53] <qengho> * Looked into a Python sys.executable bug yesterday that broke my PPA build scripts.
[16:53] <qengho> * Releasing new stable of chromium today. The beta PPA came in handy! No delay.
[16:53] <qengho> EOF
[16:55] <seb128> qengho, thanks ;-) we skipped the summaries since we worked together last week
[16:55] <qengho> seb128: Yep.  Still, that misses yesterday.
[16:55] <seb128> qengho, but nice to see the chromium stable coming
[16:56] <seb128> yeah
[16:56] <chrisccoulson> qengho, i got chromium to build on my pandaboard btw, but i needed these extra fixes: http://paste.ubuntu.com/5568114/ and http://paste.ubuntu.com/5568116/
[16:56] <Laney> jbicha: you don't fancy sponsoring the SRUs for https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gnome-shell/+bug/1128804 ?
[16:56] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1128804 in mutter "Update mutter/gnome-shell to 3.6.3" [Medium,Confirmed]
[16:57] <chrisccoulson> (although the second one actually fixes a runtime failure)
[16:57] <chrisccoulson> and i did this with the arm-neon patch too: http://paste.ubuntu.com/5568110/ ;)
[16:58] <chrisccoulson> it's a shame it still doesn't run though ;)
[16:58] <chrisccoulson> (well, the main browser process runs fine. but no renderers)
[17:00] <jbicha> Laney: I could but as far as uploader endorsements go, I was thinking it might be good to have someone else do it
[17:00] <qengho> chrisccoulson: It won't help your lack of symbols, but this may come in handy: https://code.google.com/p/chromium/wiki/LinuxDebugging
[17:00] <chrisccoulson> qengho, thanks
[17:01] <Laney> well as you already reviewed the same packages for raring it seems like a slight waste to have someone else do it
[17:01] <jbicha> Laney: ok I can do it then
[17:02] <Laney> if you want this chap to have a range of sponsors then leave his next fix in the queue for someone else :-)
[17:02] <jbicha> ok
[17:03] <Laney> cheers
[17:17] <chrisccoulson> qengho, oh, i've not added you to https://launchpad.net/~chromium-team yet?
[17:18] <chrisccoulson> just done that now :)
[17:21] <Sweetshark> shouldnt this work: bzr branch debianlp:experimental/mspub mspub ?
[17:22] <Sweetshark> disregard that.
[17:22]  * Sweetshark is being stupid.
[17:32] <rickspencer3> seb128, I was looking in my xsessions-errors file and saw this:
[17:32] <rickspencer3> compiz (core) - Info: Unity is not supported by your hardware. Enabling software rendering instead (slow).
[17:32] <rickspencer3> compiz (core) - Info: Unity is fully supported by your hardware.
[17:35] <seb128> rickspencer3, don't worry about it, seems a buggy debug output
[17:39] <seb128> yeah, unity stack landing!
[17:39] <didrocks> \o/
[17:40] <didrocks> *finally* :)
[17:43] <chrisccoulson> will it break things?
[17:44] <didrocks> chrisccoulson: why would it? we are below the threshold for our integration tests :)
[17:45] <chrisccoulson> didrocks, never heard the saying "if it ain't broke, break it!"?
[17:45] <chrisccoulson> oh, wait......
[17:45] <chrisccoulson> i got that wrong ;)
[17:46] <seb128> chrisccoulson, there is compiz in there, of course it will break something
[17:46] <seb128> ;-)
[17:46] <chrisccoulson> lol
[17:47] <didrocks> still will work better than closing and reopening thunderbird here :p
[17:49]  * seb128 sits in the middle with popcorn
[17:49] <chrisccoulson> heh
[18:04] <Sweetshark> seb128, bdrung, mterry: could one of you review http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~bjoern-michaelsen/+junk/libmspub-hardening-no-fortify/revision/4 ?
[18:04] <Sweetshark> (for bug 1124082) ?
[18:04] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1124082 in libmspub (Ubuntu) "[MIR] libmspub" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1124082
[18:04] <chrisccoulson> hey, nice screenshot in http://dbaron.org/log/20130225-removing-prefixes ;)
[18:05] <didrocks> chrisccoulson: it's a little bit like "do you want to test if the site only support webkit? :p"
[18:05] <seb128> Sweetshark, do you want to multiarch the lib? in which case you need a multi-arch: foreign as well no?
[18:06] <seb128> chrisccoulson, ;-)
[18:07]  * didrocks waves good evening
[18:09] <chrisccoulson> i bet the lack of debug symbols in chromium is another gold bug :P
[18:10] <jbicha> uh, UDS is the weekend after next? http://fridge.ubuntu.com/2013/02/26/ubuntu-developer-summits-now-online-and-every-three-months/
[18:12] <seb128> jbicha, seems like it is ;-)
[18:23] <Sweetshark> seb128: I dont want to multiarch the lib, I want to fortify it -- the easy way to do that is to go to dh 9 -- which unfortunately brings multiarch with it. but yeah, will add the multiarch-foo to debian/control
[18:24] <seb128> Sweetshark, oh ok, I misunderstood your "* adds multiarch support" changelog comment
[18:30] <tkamppeter> As we have switched now to rolling release and online-UDS every three months, does this mean that https://wiki.ubuntu.com/RaringRingtail/ReleaseSchedule is invalid now and no FF on March 7?
[18:32] <Sweetshark> seb128: hmm, given that I would need to test 'should be allowed to satisfy the dependencies of a package of a different arch from itself', I would like to even leave that out as the only client of mspub AFAIK currently is LibreOffice (where I really dont bother for multiarch). Once there are actually other clients of the lib, one could test for it and then add the Multi-Arch field proper ...
[18:32] <jbicha> tkamppeter: rolling release isn't official yet, is it?
[18:33] <seb128> Sweetshark, works for me, maybe change the .install to keep installing to /usr/lib then?
[18:33] <seb128> Sweetshark, e.g usr/lib/*/lib*.so.* /usr/lib
[18:33] <seb128> same for the -dev
[18:34] <seb128> tkamppeter, what rolling release?
[18:40] <dobey> jbicha: actually, it would be next tuesday/wednesday (exactly 1 week from today)
[18:42] <Sweetshark> seb128: hum. is there a policy for that? If I get this right, it doesnt hurt to have the lib in the new (arch-specific) location, it makes testing for actual multi-arch usecases easier, but without the declaration of Multi-Arch in control, dpkg/apt will not try some funny multiarch dep resolution with it that was never tested.
[18:42] <jbicha> oops looked at April, well that's difficult timing for community participation
[18:44] <seb128> Sweetshark, good point, I don't know
[18:48] <dobey> jbicha: lol, it's difficult timing for employee participation too :)
[18:52] <dobey> guess i'll have to go hang out at kenvandine's house, and drink all his beer instead
[18:53] <dobey> he's probably one of the closest people to me
[18:59] <czajkowski> dobey: hard life!
[18:59] <czajkowski> :)
[19:00] <Sweetshark> dobey: good point.
[19:00] <czajkowski> jbicha: like we said in the other channel, timezones are pesky and it's never gonna suit everyone, but having it online does mean more people can get involved, or watch the videos afterwards
[19:01]  * Sweetshark will then invade asac home as UDS-replacement, before he finds out where I live.
[19:09] <BigWhale> I like popey's idea. About moving around the house with your laptop after each session.
[19:11]  * Laney needs to find that fix didrocks posted for the G+ hangout pluging thingy
[19:11] <jbicha> dobey: yeah, it like should we focus on finalizing last-minute features because of the impending freeze or participate in the scrambled-together-at-the-last-minute online UDS thing?
[19:14] <Sweetshark> BigWhale: I wonder how to simulate the "too much food, too little sleep and finish it off with a Ubuflu" conditions that make UDSes so unique ...
[19:17] <jbicha> Sweetshark: do like the Community Team and have a 24-hour G+ hangout complete with a big bbq?
[19:19] <Sweetshark> jbicha: that might work
[19:19] <jcastro> jbicha: the entire plan all along was to make the entire project suffer like we did!
[19:20] <BigWhale> A constant video stream of Jono's bbq. I wonder if we can simulate the smell ...
[19:23] <bdrung> Sweetshark: i have much to complain about your proposed libmspub changes.
[19:23] <bdrung> first, we have 0.0.4-1ubuntu2 in the archive, which should have hardening enabled
[19:24] <bdrung> second, adding an hardening-no-fortify-functions override makes no sense if you want to build the package with hardening
[19:26] <Laney> I think he found that the lintian tag was a false positive
[19:27] <sarnold> bdrung: hrm, I think in 1ubuntu2 fortify wasn't turned on for the library and stack protection wasn't turned on for one of the executables.
[19:27] <Laney> there was some scrollback about this
[19:30] <cyphermox> Laney: did you find didrock's post after all?
[19:30] <Laney> I didn't look, but it was on his block IIRC
[19:30] <cyphermox> yeah
[19:30] <cyphermox> http://blog.didrocks.fr/post/Getting-sound-working-during-a-hangout-in-raring
[19:31] <Laney> cheers
[19:31]  * Laney is playing borderland atm ;-)
[19:31] <cyphermox> lucky you
[19:31]  * cyphermox looking forward to playing some more minecraft tonight
[19:31] <BigWhale> Last time our LoCo had a hangout my ISP's modem was freezing after 1 minute into Hangout session. It was driving me crazy.
[19:32] <BigWhale> I hope this is fixed now. :/
[19:32] <cyphermox> I signed up for trying to fix something in NM I thought would take 5 minutes, turns out to not being that easy after all ;)
[19:32] <chrisccoulson> hmmm, chromium actually builds surprisingly fast on my laptop
[19:33] <Sweetshark> bdrung: hah, indeed I missed that update. please consider to link to the relevant bug 1124082 next time when updating ...
[19:33] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 1124082 in libmspub (Ubuntu) "[MIR] libmspub" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1124082
[19:34] <Sweetshark> bdrung: I was discussing this with mterry in London for the MIR while you sneaked by the update ;)
[19:34] <qengho> chrisccoulson: yeah, it's not so bad with decent IO/
[19:34] <Sweetshark> bdrung: anyway dh9 should solve the fortify issue, so the MIR is unblocked -- deleting my branch then.
[19:36] <mterry> Sweetshark, we don't need your branch?
[19:37] <Sweetshark> mterry: no
[19:37] <mterry> Sweetshark, is latest packaging using dh9 and hardening?
[19:38] <bdrung> mterry: yes
[19:38] <Sweetshark> bdrung: actually you _did_ write that in the bug, sorry.
[19:38] <mterry> bdrung, awesome.  let me confirm and comment in MIR then
[19:39] <Sweetshark> bdrung: mterry and me sat in the same room and discussed why this was still on incomplete. We probably missed out the comment because we could discuss f2f and thus had less of a look on the bug itself.
[19:40] <Sweetshark> bdrung: sorry again for that one.
[19:40] <bdrung> Sweetshark: no problem :)
[19:41] <sarnold> mterry: while discussing this, thanks for the explanation re: MIR and test suites. :)
[19:42] <seb128> dobey, going to kenvandine's house to drink beer for UDS seems like a plan
[19:42] <mterry> sarnold, 'course  :)
[19:43] <mterry> I'll road-trip to kenvandine's
[19:43] <jbicha> seb128: +1 :)
[19:47] <BigWhale> mterry, for some of us it would be a voyage not a road trip :>
[19:48] <mterry> BigWhale, kenvandine's beer is worth it!
[19:49] <BigWhale> :))
[19:50] <kenvandine> sounds good to me!
[19:55] <bdrung> sarnold: looking at the build log, fortify was passed to every command. therefore i assume that the missing fortify is a false positive.
[19:56] <bdrung> sarnold: -fstack-protector is used for the executables
[19:56] <seb128> bdrung, Sweetshark you mean?
[19:56] <sarnold> bdrung: thank you
[19:56] <sarnold> seb128: no, I had questions/complaints :)
[19:56] <seb128> oh, ok
[20:01] <bdrung> sarnold: i have commented the bug. please note the reviewed version in the future, please.
[20:04] <sarnold> bdrung: ack, thanks :)
[20:04] <dupondje> After booting, 50% of the time gui fails to start :( lightdm stop && lightdm start fixes it ... any idea's? Known bug?
[20:05] <mterry> Sweetshark, bdrung: compiling the latest libmspub (-1ubuntu2), I still get "libmspub-0.0-0: hardening-no-fortify-functions usr/lib/libmspub-0.0.so.0.0.4"
[20:05] <seb128> dupondje, bug #873495 I guess
[20:05] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 873495 in lightdm (Ubuntu Precise) "LightDM fails to start after nvidia-current or nvidia-current-updates are installed (upstart job issue)" [High,Triaged] https://launchpad.net/bugs/873495
[20:05] <seb128> or similar
[20:05] <seb128> mterry, ok, update-manager is still misbehaving for me
[20:06] <bdrung> mterry: which lintian version do you use?
[20:06] <mterry> bdrung, 2.5.11ubuntu1
[20:06] <mterry> seb128, which way this time?
[20:06]  * didrocks really waves good evening
[20:06] <seb128> mterry, I get the "you have sources not auth" stuff, I do "ok", then I get the list, click "upgrade", then it gives me a "can't upgrade, needs unverified package"
[20:07] <mterry> seb128, hrm.  Can you file a new bug?
[20:07] <seb128> mterry, can do
[20:07] <mterry> seb128, though I'm not sure what the right behavior is there.  Just asking the user if it's OK is one of those 'train-the-user-to-click-OK' issues
[20:08] <seb128> mterry, yeah, I don't even know why I'm getting those, I added the sources through software-properties
[20:08] <bdrung> mterry: as commented in the bug: it's a false positive. lintian 2.5.12~git20130218 won't complain about it any more.
[20:08] <seb128> it feels like something should suggest you to try to fetch the keys from the ppa again or something
[20:08] <mterry> bdrung, OK, cool
[20:10] <Sweetshark> mterry, bdrung: I a/ looked at the compile commands issued by that autotools mess and the had the fortify switches b/ used http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=673112#40 as advised by seb128 c/ found memcpy, memset and one other call with that d/ grepped for those in the source, but only found memcpy -- exclusively inside libtool
[20:10] <ubot2> Debian bug 673112 in lintian "lintian: hardening-no-stackprotector check has many false positives" [Normal,Fixed]
[20:11] <mterry> Sweetshark, cool
[20:11] <mterry> Sweetshark, I approved the MIR
[20:11] <dupondje> seb128: no nvidia installed. And running Raring :)
[20:12] <Sweetshark> mterry: AFAIK thats reasonably save, if the security guys have a better way to get about with it, Im all ears.
[20:13] <seb128> dupondje, it seems like more a timing/upstart job issue, the title is misleading
[21:37] <chrisccoulson> oh, man, we actually compile chromium without "-g". that will be why there's no symbols. we don't pass CFLAGS to the build environment, and the build system only gives you symbols if it's a debug build or if you build with breakpad enabled
[21:37] <TheMuso> Hey folks.
[22:01] <asac> Sweetshark: :)
[22:04] <RAOF> chrisccoulson: Funky!
[22:17] <chrisccoulson> bah, build is much slower with debug symbols. i take my earlier comments back now :P
[22:18] <RAOF> *Much* slower? I thought it was already multi-hour!
[22:21] <TheMuso> Hey RAOF, hope you've recovered and had an uneventful flight.
[22:21] <RAOF> TheMuso: You too!
[22:21] <RAOF> I'm mostly recovered; Zoë makes it a little bit difficult to tell :)
[22:21] <RAOF> The flight back was a tiny bit bumpier than usual, but otherwise uneventful.
[22:22] <TheMuso> Thanks, after 2 early nights, I'm feeling recovered. Both my flights were quite turbulent.
[22:23] <TheMuso> And we literally hit a bad patch right in the middle of the first meal service on the second flight from Singapore.
[22:23] <TheMuso> It was quite literally a roller coaster ride for a couple of minutes there.
[22:24] <TheMuso> Quite fun if you are properly strapped in...
[22:25] <RAOF> Not my cup of tea :)
[22:27] <TheMuso> Well it wasn't really that bad, but yeah certainly not smooth.
[22:27] <bcurtiswx> hmm, i wonder what package hates empathy
[23:04] <jbicha> Laney: could you rebuild clutter-gtk, clutter-gst & clutter-gst-2.0 for me?
[23:16] <TheMuso> jbicha_: At the rate I'm going with the pilot queue here, I may not have anything to do in a while... So I'll take care of those rebuilds for you if I get a chance.
[23:23] <jbicha_> TheMuso: thanks


[03:31] <mwhudson> anyone happen to know how grub finds its configuration when booting under uefi?
[03:37] <stgraber> there's normally a minimal grub.cfg alongside grubx64.efi in /boot/efi/EFI/ubuntu/ which has enough logic to source the main config from whatever partition has /boot/grub.cfg
[04:00] <mwhudson> stgraber: thanks, turns out i was not testing the thing i thought i was testing, sigh
[05:11] <teward> bryyce: rbasak: when the nginx package has been git-ubuntufied can you give me the location to git-ubuntu clone it?
[05:11] <teward> (thank you!)
[05:24] <bryyce> teward, sure.  It'll be findable at https://code.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nginx, or just run 'snap install git-ubuntu; git ubuntu clone nginx'
[05:27] <bryyce> teward, I finished importing it to git ubuntu today, but need to make sure what remains is accurate, and build/autopkgtest it.
[05:32] <teward> cool.  i have git-ubuntu installed already so i'll just git ubuntu clone it as you indicated.
[05:32] <teward> and again if there's anything you want me to peek at let me know, there's a few changes also in the works - moving some of the SSL components to a conf.d snippet instead of keeping in nginx.conf (been requested many times)
[05:32] <teward> s/SSL components/default SSL components/
[05:32] <teward> so that's a packaging level change but i'll let the merge happen first :)
[05:35] <bryyce> teward, thanks, yeah would be helpful to get your eyes on the result to make sure I haven't messed any important bits up :-)
[05:37] <bryyce> teward, btw I noticed debian seems to have some of the php version stuff under /run rather than /var/run, so wondered if that's led to any issues with anyone, or if it's just a theoretical issue
[05:45] <teward> bryyce: it's more of an issue when we do backports to releases where everything isn't in /run or /var/run or such isn't symlinked to /run or a few other cases - i haven't heard of it causing any issues in Debian so long as the configuration is updated properly to know the different locations.  The NGINX PPA has been a direct-from-debian sync since eternity and has not had any issues with /run vs. /var/run so long as the PID config is done
[05:45] <teward> right.
[05:46] <teward> but i'll take a look after i wake up
[05:46] <teward> 01:46 local and last night I didn't sleep well so i need to get to bed heh
[05:46] <bryyce> teward, sleep well
[05:49] <teward> bryyce: ideally what we're going to do here is match the Ubuntuisms with the configs (php paths, etc.) so if you want to do me a solid and see where php-fpm in Groovy ends up dropping its socket, that'd be great, I *think* it's a /var/run path, but I forget exactly.  :P
[05:50] <teward> i'm also thinking of moving the PHP configs to a snippets/ config snippet for easier inclusion into other configs as well, just as a heads up for future planned ideas/changes that are minor but make things look nicer and easier for end users heh
[05:54] <bryyce> teward, that'd be great, thanks
[05:55] <bryyce> yeah I can look into what php-fpm does
[06:04] <teward> bryyce: I don't have upload / push privs it seems, heh.  not sure whether that's an issue, but I can just dump merge requests if necessary
[06:06] <bryyce> teward, Mp's are fine, that's basically our standard procedure already.  afaik push privs are just == core dev
[06:06] <teward> heh.  well i am coredev so xD
[06:07] <teward> alls good.  actually going to sleep now.  /off
[06:07] <bryyce> night o/
[08:05] <knocte> do gtk2 apps have the same theme as gtk3 apps in ubuntu 20.04? or is that a known issue?
[10:19] <seb128> rbasak, hey, if you doa  SRU shift today could you review the gnome-shell stack in the focal queue? it's waiting for 10 days and including some fixes we would like to see landing
[10:20] <seb128> rbasak, also for an easier one gnutl28/focal would be nice
[10:27] <seb128> rbasak, gnutls28 uploaded to bionic as well, would be nice to also review, it's a simple patch but it should fix connection failing to yahoo/aol/verizon emails servers (following server changes so it used to work and recently stopped working in bionic/focal)
[10:55] <rbasak> seb128: sure - if I get to my SRU shift today I'll look at those.
[11:13] <cpaelzer> hi doko, if I'd file a LP bug to get a fix for https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23465 into Bionic is ther any chance this will happen or should I stop right away?
[11:13] <cpaelzer> fnordahl: ^^ FYI
[11:14] <cpaelzer> well I blindly assumed binutils would usually be you doko, let me actually check the changelog  ...
[11:16] <doko> cpaelzer: including the referenced commit in the bug report?
[11:19] <cpaelzer> doko: yeah I guess that is what would need to be backported
[11:19] <cpaelzer> mostly changing the self tests afaics
[11:20] <cpaelzer> I think the effective functional change would just be https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=blobdiff;f=gas/config/tc-i386.c;h=b8042ba434207efe9d70c9de9654a2ff110a2c9d;hp=cd69321bdb25f698f7764e5648d10253472724a3;hb=4e518864c879be2e6af4c64415e8775d9a20deaf;hpb=e521dc888158a6cdbdccef0397e663c437450a80
[11:25] <fnordahl> cpaelzer: ta for heads up
[11:27] <cpaelzer> sure fnordahl - if doko says it appears to be generally doable I'd file a proper LP bug for it and reply that to the mail
[11:27] <cpaelzer> asking them to chime in on the bug for e.g. testing
[11:31] <mantas-baltix> Anyone noticed, that Snap store launcher is untranslated in Applications menu (Activities Overview)? I've registered a bug #1882929 , but no answer from developer in 7 days :(
[11:33] <cpaelzer> doko: I'll file a bug as that will be quick - could you state ther eif you consider this doable or not?
[11:33] <cpaelzer> that will also serve as a single place to unite communication on the topic
[11:34] <cpaelzer> doko: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/binutils/+bug/1883880 it is
[11:34] <cpaelzer> fnordahl: ^^ for you to subscribe to
[11:36] <seb128> rbasak, thanks!
[11:55] <ahasenack> seb128, doko: hi, I'm starting my day, +1 maintenance for the whole week. I updated the wiki with what I have going on
[11:56] <seb128> ahasenack, ack, thanks, I'm about to start as well, I will check what you put there and update the channel as needed
[11:59] <doko> ahasenack, seb128: manually cleaned up some NBS binaries in -proposed, now working from the bottom, on ftbfs. lib3mf
[11:59] <ahasenack> doko: did you happen to see mail-stack-delivery (from dovecot) in those nbs?
[11:59] <ahasenack> it's not in the report yet, I think because current dovecot (a sync) is an ftbfs
[12:00] <doko> no
[12:00] <ahasenack> ok
[12:09] <ahasenack> one thing I'm noticing with this +1 rotation is that my inbox is getting out of control
[12:10] <ahasenack> since I'm not focusing on other tasks
[12:19] <ahasenack> https://github.com/golang/go/issues +5000 issues open
[12:19] <ahasenack> what chance to I have
[12:19] <ahasenack> *do
[12:20] <ahasenack> xnox: about that golang issue from yesterday, should I file a bug upstream with go? I fear a rabbit hole if I keep digging, like starting a matrix of tests with multiple versions of unpatched go (i.e., not from ubuntu, but straight upstream)
[12:20] <ahasenack> I could file that issue upstream, and upload the yaml.v2 package with that crazy patch of mine with a link to that issue
[12:21] <ahasenack> that would unblock our migration, and help prometheus to migrate as well I'm told
[12:21] <ahasenack> doko: do you have an opinion? Do you fancy go? :)
[12:21] <ahasenack> crazy patch is https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/golang-yaml.v2/+bug/1883770/comments/4
[12:22] <doko> ahasenack: you should ask mwhudson ;p   but yes, I think we need a more general solution for all the go packages
[12:23] <ahasenack> it's the first I see of this, can't say it's affecting others
[12:23] <ahasenack> mwhudson is many hours away
[12:23] <ahasenack> I'll file the upstream bug, see how they respond over this week while I'm still on +1 maint
[12:23]  * ahasenack thinks we need an acronym for "+1 maintenance"
[12:25] <rbasak> POM
[12:25] <rbasak> When there are two people on rotation, you would therefore have POM POM.
[12:25] <ahasenack> sounds like PAN PAN
[12:25] <ahasenack> inside airplane pilots joke
[13:39] <ahasenack> xnox: I filed https://github.com/golang/go/issues/39651
[14:11] <ahasenack> xnox: I also just tried upstream's s390x build and the test fails in the same way, so it doesn't look any of our patches are the culprit
[15:06] <cpaelzer> doko: the upsream people already chimed in on bug 1883880 to help wit ha testcase
[15:06] <cpaelzer> doko: that should make an SRU easier
[15:17] <sforshee> LocutusOfBorg: dkms 2.8.2-1ubuntu1 is breaking building dkms builds in our kernel packages, and it looks like the change which breaks us has been reverted upstream - https://github.com/dell/dkms/commit/885f8275aa65fb11be1e17bc28a0b0ea734dc585
[15:17] <sforshee> can we get that reverted in our package too?
[15:19] <sforshee> apw: ^
[15:19] <apw> utter shit
[15:20] <apw> oops :) applogies
[15:54] <LocutusOfBorg> ohhhhhhhhhhhhhh
[15:54] <LocutusOfBorg> thansk sforshee
[15:54] <LocutusOfBorg> I was trying hard to find that commit!
[15:54] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks a lot!
[15:54] <LocutusOfBorg> damn, I didn't look at irc :/
[15:56] <LocutusOfBorg> I have another possibly breaking change, lets see how far we go
[19:38] <ahasenack> I have a curious go test problem. In a PPA, it fails because it cannot download a certain go module
[19:38] <ahasenack> but locally in lxd, with network *disabled*, it doesn't try that, and it works
[19:38] <ahasenack> https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/G3FprRXztN/
[19:38] <ahasenack> any ideas?
[19:38] <ahasenack> same package, version, proposed enabled
[19:38] <ahasenack> ah, wait, I don't have proposed enabled in the lxd container
[19:39] <LocutusOfBorg> sforshee, looks really better now :D
[19:40] <sforshee> LocutusOfBorg: great, let me retry these kernel builds and see how it goes
[19:47] <ahasenack> hm, no change with proposed
[19:47] <ahasenack> for some reason, locally it doesn't reach out
[19:47] <ahasenack> I wonder if it's about a controlling terminal during the build, if it behaves differently in each case
[19:54] <ahasenack> aha!
[19:54] <ahasenack> it was the terminal
[19:54] <ahasenack> if I run dpkg-buildpackage -uc -us > ../log 2>&1
[19:54] <ahasenack> then it fails locally as well
[19:54] <ahasenack> sneaky!
[19:57] <ahasenack> hm, scratch that
[20:35] <ahasenack> mwhudson: hey, saw you are online
[20:35] <mwhudson> ahasenack: hi
[20:35] <ahasenack> mwhudson: if you have an idea, I have this problem: in a ppa, the go test tries to pull in a module from the internet
[20:35] <ahasenack> but locally (lxd), it doesn't: https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/G3FprRXztN/
[20:35] <ahasenack> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/golang-github-fsouza-go-dockerclient/1.6.5-1/+build/19442767 is the package/build in question
[20:36] <ahasenack> and locally I tried without a network (used lxc exec to enter the container, and disabled eth0)
[20:36] <mwhudson> does the package depend on golang-golang-x-crypto-dev?
[20:37] <mwhudson> but hm yeah that's strange
[20:38] <ahasenack> mwhudson: no, we don't even have that package
[20:38] <mwhudson> oh i bet golang-github-docker-docker-dev depends on golang-golang-x-crypto-dev in debian but not ubuntu
[20:39] <ahasenack> mwhudson: looks like it was added by http://paste.ubuntu.com/p/23vMxTBWCV/ once upon a time, and upstream took it
[20:39] <ahasenack> mwhudson: oh, so golang-golang-x-crypto-dev provides that ssh/terminal bit?
[20:39] <mwhudson> yes
[20:39] <ahasenack> but still wouldn't explain why it works locally
[20:40] <mwhudson> that's true that is strange
[20:40] <ahasenack> hm, so I have that installed
[20:40] <ahasenack> but the builder log doesn't show it being installed
[20:40] <ahasenack> I'll investigate that
[20:41] <ahasenack> mwhudson: indeed, the debian build log shows golang-golang-x-crypto-dev being installed
[20:41] <ahasenack> ours doesn't
[20:41] <ahasenack> interesting
[20:41] <ahasenack> mwhudson: I have enough to go on now, many thanks
[20:41] <mwhudson> ahasenack: it'll be related to the golang-docker-*-dev stuff
[20:43] <mwhudson> in any case, if the package imports it directly, it should be in b-d, iow that debian patch should have come with a change to control as well
[20:44] <ahasenack> mwhudson: check out this fun golang bug I filed today, btw: https://github.com/golang/go/issues/39651
[20:44] <mwhudson> ahasenack: mundaym is pretty good at fixing this kind of stuff
[20:48] <mwhudson> ahasenack: did you try 1.15beta1 fwiw? it's available as a snap now
[20:48] <ahasenack> mwhudson: I noticed he is from ibm, and he mentioned he fixed a similar bug in the past
[20:49] <ahasenack> mwhudson: I didn't, I just tried the upstream binary tarball for s390x, I saw they had one
[20:49] <mwhudson> ahasenack: yeah, he did the s390x port
[20:49] <mwhudson> ahasenack: https://dl.google.com/go/go1.15beta1.linux-s390x.tar.gz is a thing too, might be worth a try if you have an environment set up
[20:49] <ahasenack> oh, I do
[20:49] <ahasenack> let me fetch that
[20:55] <ahasenack> mwhudson: 1.15b1 failed the same way
[20:55] <mwhudson> ahasenack: ah well
[20:55] <ahasenack> worth a try
[20:56] <mwhudson> leave it to the ibm elves then :)
[20:56] <ahasenack> hehe
[20:56] <mwhudson> (unless you want to start staring at disassembly)
[20:59] <ahasenack> mwhudson: there is a shocking diff between the Depends of golang-github-docker-docker-dev in debian and ubuntu: https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/9d8XmsfGqT/
[20:59] <ahasenack> we have all that stuff vendorized?
[20:59] <mwhudson> ahasenack: ah hah um yeah
[20:59] <mwhudson> i don't know, tbh
[21:04] <ahasenack> we don't use dh-golang to build
[21:05] <ahasenack> and debian declares a *lot* of manual Depends packages
[21:05] <ahasenack> ok, something for later
[21:05] <ahasenack> let me fix this build
[21:46] <ahasenack> mwhudson: https://code.launchpad.net/~ahasenack/ubuntu/+source/golang-github-fsouza-go-dockerclient/+git/golang-github-fsouza-go-dockerclient/+merge/385957
[21:47] <ahasenack> confirmed fixed in https://launchpad.net/~ahasenack/+archive/ubuntu/fsouza/+packages
[21:47] <mwhudson> ahasenack: +1
[21:47] <ahasenack> mwhudson: can you do a quick +1 in the mp?
[21:49] <xnox> ahasenack:  we have outofsync containerd/docker-dev stuff between debian and ubuntu
[21:49] <xnox> ahasenack:  i think we are newer, and that's causing divergence in the build-depends.
[21:49] <ahasenack> mwhudson: awesome, thanks
[21:49] <xnox> because stuff got reorged
[21:49] <ahasenack> xnox: it's quite the divergence
[21:49] <ahasenack> I filed a bug to investigate that
[21:50] <ahasenack> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/docker.io/+bug/1883978
[21:50] <ahasenack> xnox: it was a difference in depends, not just build-depends
[21:50] <ahasenack> haven't checked b-d
[21:50] <mwhudson> also the debian maintainer has a king sized pair of jfdi boots
[21:53] <ahasenack> it's weird to have golang.*-dev packages as depends
[22:01] <ahasenack> rbalint: doko: osomon: seb128: hello fellow +1maintainers for tomorrow (18th), I kept my wiki entry up-to-date under the "Progress" title
[22:02]  * ahasenack -> EOD
[22:08] <sarnold> ahasenack: nice find


[00:00] <jcastro> JoseeAntonioR: why another calendar?
[00:11] <JoseeAntonioR> jcastro: huh?
[00:12] <JoseeAntonioR> jcastro: ah, that has been over there for a long time, to keep track on which events where on-air and which weren't
[00:13] <JoseeAntonioR> and a few days ago you said "we'll need our calendar!", so there you go!
[04:27] <snap-l> http://www.metalinjection.net/fm
[06:53] <dholbach> good morning
[08:06] <czajkowski> aloha
[11:56] <daker> czajkowski: hi
[11:56] <daker> czajkowski: https://answers.launchpad.net/loco-team-portal/+question/206393
[11:58] <czajkowski> daker: hey so usually the LC will mail them also and see if any replies happen
[11:58] <czajkowski> they do need to check
[11:58] <czajkowski> then the LP admins will then change the owner
[12:00] <daker> ok
[12:22] <cjohnston> mhall119: UDS sponsorship should be turned off correct? the email I saw had yesterday as the deadline
[13:04] <mhall119> cjohnston: done
[13:35]  * daker crosses his fingers
[13:37] <czajkowski> daker: that has been taken care of now for you
[13:37] <czajkowski> and the issue answered
[13:37] <daker> czajkowski: thank you :)
[13:39] <jcastro> bkerensa: what gear do you use to measure your house?
[13:45] <czajkowski> daker: np
[15:51] <jcastro> greg-g: ping me when you're around pls
[16:00] <greg-g> jcastro: hello there sir
[16:00] <jcastro> hey just a quick question
[16:00] <jcastro> http://www.nasa.gov/audience/formedia/features/MP_Photo_Guidelines.html
[16:01] <jcastro> I was wondering how this uhh, "license" would work wrt. CC BY SA
[16:01] <jcastro> I was hoping someone would like, submit a wallpaper with Curiosity photos
[16:01] <jcastro> but I don't know how we fit into that.
[16:09] <greg-g> sorry, had a morning computer fart... loading the link now
[16:10] <greg-g> so, anything created by a federal employee during the course of their work is not protected by copyright*
[16:10] <greg-g> *(In the US, the US gov has the potential option of enforcing copyrights in other jurisdictions, but they rarely do (I don't think ever, actually))
[16:10] <jcastro> greg-g: yeah so a bunch of the curiosity pics are totally awesome.
[16:11] <jcastro> I think it'd be awesome to see it as a wallpaper, triumph of humanity, etc.
[16:11] <greg-g> so, they can't be licensed BY-SA or any other copyright license since they are not subject to copyright, they are PD
[16:11] <jcastro> will that be a problem for ubuntu?
[16:11] <greg-g> shouldn't be
[16:11] <greg-g> IANAL, TINLA, OMGWTFBBQ
[16:14] <jcastro> heh
[16:21] <dholbach> alright my friends - I call it a day
[16:21] <dholbach> see you all tomorrow
[16:21] <dholbach> HUGS
[16:35] <jcastro> hey mhall119
[16:35] <jcastro> do you think the 2d->3d thing for ubuntu tv will be done this cycle?
[16:36] <jcastro> I have a WI for testing the ubuntutv PPA
[16:36] <mhall119> jcastro: I can't say for sure, but from my discussion with them I would say no
[16:36] <jcastro> k
[16:36] <mhall119> I think it's safe to mark that WI as postponed
[16:36] <mhall119> or blocked
[16:36] <jcastro> bummer, I am really aching for it
[16:37]  * mhall119 <-- choir
[16:37] <jcastro> from a non work perspective too, heh
[18:12] <bkerensa> jcastro:  Belkin Conserve Energy Monitor, ThinkEco Modlets and I also monitor my kWH on my bill
[18:16] <balloons> pleia2, ping
[18:16] <pleia2> balloons: pong
[18:51] <bkerensa> I'm wondering if 12.10 will have a startup sound
[18:51] <AlanBell> does it not at the moment bkerensa?
[18:51] <AlanBell> I should test an iso really
[18:52] <bkerensa> 12.04 doesnt and no 12.10 not yet
[19:04] <AlanBell> yikes quantal is very broken in virtualbox
[19:07] <jono> mhall119, btw, I extended UDS sponsorship a little
[19:07] <jono> see the date of the ubuntu-devel announce
[19:08] <mhall119> jono: did you just send it? last one I see from you was on the 14th
[19:08] <jono> mhall119, the email I sent last week
[19:09] <jono> mhall119, ahhh it did close
[19:09] <jono> ok cool :-)
[19:10] <mhall119> so we're good then?
[19:53] <twobottux`> aucommunity: Is there any project in existence to have common( all apps) settings? <http://askubuntu.com/questions/178695/is-there-any-project-in-existence-to-have-common-all-apps-settings>
[20:05] <twobottux`> aucommunity: Are there transcripts of UDS sessions? <http://askubuntu.com/questions/74440/are-there-transcripts-of-uds-sessions>
[20:06] <jcastro> bot
[20:19] <snap-l> Is that a new feature?
[20:20] <snap-l> and is it staying?
[20:20] <snap-l> :)
[20:20] <AlanBell> snap-l: I believe it has been here some time and brings in stuff tagged community
[20:20] <jcastro> I don't get why it did the 2nd one
[20:22] <AlanBell> don't get why it did the first one, maybe it was tagged community and has been untagged since or something
[20:22] <jcastro> yeah
[20:22] <jcastro> I untagged it community
[20:22] <AlanBell> oh, right
[20:22] <jcastro> it was originally tagged that way but that didn't make sense so I undid it
[20:23] <jcastro> why it mentioned the 2nd one I have no idea
[20:23] <AlanBell> second one is tagged community
[20:23] <jcastro> yeah but it's answered
[20:23] <jcastro> I was under the impression the bot did new questions
[20:23] <jcastro> not old ones
[20:24] <AlanBell> ah, I see what you mean
[20:45] <marcoceppi> jcastro: no idea, but it's done similar things in the Juju room
[20:53] <jcastro> k
[20:53] <jcastro> I'll mention it to jokerdino next time I see him
[21:39] <bkerensa> jcastro: :P I may not be able to hack on Juju in the future ;o
[21:41] <mhall119> bkerensa: the first juju charm for django was built around a puppet script, so he's not going to let you off the hook that easily :P
[21:42] <bkerensa> mhall119: heh :P I imagine I will be too busy ;) the role requires extensive travel
[21:43] <mhall119> so does jcastro's
[21:49] <bkerensa> mhall119: you dont have to travel too much do you? Just lots of calls
[22:14] <mhall119> bkerensa: not me, no


[19:57] <sillyslux> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T6nYdHwgCIk
[19:57] <datase> ^ YouTube :: Volkswagen I.D. R Pikes Peak – record run, all angles :: Duration: 08:48 :: Views: 13,911 uploaded by Volkswagen Motorsport :: 125 likes :: 4 dislikes :: 0 favorites
[19:57] <sillyslux> ayyme koji zvuk auta
[20:12] <sillyslux> oh bug ima neki night mode


[00:14] <wgrant> libaccounts-glib fixes the FTBFS and unblocks most of the remaining desktop stacks
[00:14] <wgrant> on riscv64
[00:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: neutron (focal-proposed/main) [2:16.0.0~b3~git2020032420.a0e1b5804e-0ubuntu3 => 2:16.0.0~b3~git2020032420.a0e1b5804e-0ubuntu4] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[00:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nova (focal-proposed/main) [2:21.0.0~b3~git2020032515.35240b0d8c-0ubuntu1 => 2:21.0.0~b3~git2020032515.35240b0d8c-0ubuntu2] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[01:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: pcs (focal-proposed/universe) [0.10.4-2ubuntu1 => 0.10.4-3] (no packageset) (sync)
[01:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pcs [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.10.4-3]
[01:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: autoradio (focal-proposed/universe) [3.1-6 => 3.4-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[01:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted autoradio [sync] (focal-proposed) [3.4-2]
[01:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: backupchecker (focal-proposed/universe) [1.7-1 => 1.7-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[01:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted backupchecker [source] (focal-proposed) [1.7-1ubuntu1]
[01:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: brebis (focal-proposed/universe) [0.10-1build1 => 0.10-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[01:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted brebis [source] (focal-proposed) [0.10-1ubuntu1]
[01:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: c-icap-modules (focal-proposed/universe) [1:0.5.3-2 => 1:0.5.4-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[01:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted c-icap-modules [sync] (focal-proposed) [1:0.5.4-1]
[02:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: can-utils (focal-proposed/universe) [2018.02.0-1 => 2018.02.0-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[02:04] <tjaalton> vorlon: right, there hadn't been a nee release since 2016 so i made that snapshot, it had three commits for py3 fixes etc. here's the git log https://pastebin.com/1Qh9Grx
[02:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted can-utils [source] (focal-proposed) [2018.02.0-1ubuntu1]
[02:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloop (focal-proposed/universe) [<IP_ADDRESS>ubuntu2 => <IP_ADDRESS>ubuntu3] (no packageset)
[02:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cloop [source] (focal-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>ubuntu3]
[02:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cmark-gfm (focal-proposed/universe) [0.29.0.gfm.0-3 => 0.29.0.gfm.0-4] (no packageset) (sync)
[02:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cmark-gfm [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.29.0.gfm.0-4]
[02:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: colord-kde (focal-proposed/universe) [0.5.0-3build1 => 0.5.0-4] (kubuntu) (sync)
[02:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: construct (focal-proposed/universe) [2.8.16-0.3 => 2.8.16-0.3ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[02:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted construct [source] (focal-proposed) [2.8.16-0.3ubuntu1]
[02:32] <Eickmeyer[m]> tjaalton: I just formally approved bug 1871049 and renamed it if you want to use it as a FFe for darktable.
[02:33] <tjaalton> Eickmeyer[m]: ah, thanks!
[02:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cutesdr (focal-proposed/universe) [1.20-3build2 => 1.20-4] (no packageset) (sync)
[02:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cutesdr [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.20-4]
[02:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debbugs (focal-proposed/universe) [2.6.0 => 2.6.0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[02:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted debbugs [source] (focal-proposed) [2.6.0ubuntu1]
[02:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dlz-ldap-enum (focal-proposed/universe) [1.1.0-1 => 1.1.0-1.1] (no packageset) (sync)
[02:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted dlz-ldap-enum [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.1.0-1.1]
[02:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: egl-wayland (focal-proposed/universe) [1:1.1.3-1 => 1:1.1.3-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[02:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted egl-wayland [source] (focal-proposed) [1:1.1.3-1ubuntu1]
[03:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: firmware-microbit-micropython (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0.1-1 => 1.0.1-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[03:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: flake8-polyfill (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0.2-1 => 1.0.2-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[03:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted firmware-microbit-micropython [source] (focal-proposed) [1.0.1-1ubuntu1]
[03:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted flake8-polyfill [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.0.2-2]
[03:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gnome-software (bionic-proposed/main) [3.28.1-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS> => 3.28.1-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>] (ubuntu-desktop)
[03:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ukui-control-center (focal-proposed/universe) [<IP_ADDRESS>-2 => 2.0.3-1] (ubuntukylin) (sync)
[03:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ukui-panel (focal-proposed/universe) [2.0.3-1 => 2.0.5-1] (ubuntukylin) (sync)
[03:59] <tjaalton> please ack intel-gpu-tools sync, fixes the build
[03:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kylin-nm (focal-proposed/universe) [<IP_ADDRESS>-1 => 1.2.3-1] (ubuntukylin) (sync)
[04:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ukui-media (focal-proposed/universe) [2.0.1-1 => 2.0.3-1] (ubuntukylin) (sync)
[04:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: peony (focal-proposed/universe) [2.1.0-1 => 2.1.2-1] (ubuntukylin) (sync)
[04:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dropwatch [riscv64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.5.1-2] (no packageset)
[04:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [s390x] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-23.27] (core, kernel)
[04:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-23.27] (core, kernel)
[04:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-23.27] (core, kernel)
[05:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [arm64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-23.27] (core, kernel)
[05:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-23.27]
[05:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-23.27]
[05:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [arm64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-23.27]
[05:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [s390x] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-23.27]
[06:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libaccounts-glib [source] (focal-proposed) [1.23+17.04.20161104-0ubuntu3]
[06:42] <seb128> hey there, did anyone see my question from yesterday evening? how is update_excuses.yaml generated? was the generation changed recently to special case the new riscv entries?
[06:42] <seb128> those are missing a policyinfo and the by team proposed migration doesn't like it
[06:42] <seb128> wgrant, ^ do you know?
[06:43] <wgrant> seb128: I don't know much about proposed-migration, I'm afraid
[07:06] <sil2100> Morning o/ Let me start with a quick browse through the queue
[07:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected wine-development [sync] (focal-proposed) [5.5-3]
[07:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted wine-development [source] (focal-proposed) [5.5-3ubuntu1]
[07:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fonts-ebgaramond [source] (focal-proposed) [0.016-1ubuntu1]
[07:11] <sil2100> tjaalton: hey! Looking at rapid-photo-downloader, the new upstream version of 0.9.20 seems to be adding at least one new feature - is that right? Is there an FFe for this?
[07:12] <tjaalton> sil2100: nope
[07:12] <tjaalton> no ffe I mean
[07:12] <tjaalton> though I could write one I guess
[07:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gnome-settings-daemon [source] (focal-proposed) [3.36.0-1ubuntu1]
[07:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ukui-power-manager [sync] (focal-proposed) [2.0.2-1]
[07:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apparmor [source] (focal-proposed) [2.13.3-7ubuntu4]
[07:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted command-not-found [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04.2]
[07:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted isc-dhcp [source] (focal-proposed) [4.4.1-2.1ubuntu4]
[07:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted json-glib [source] (focal-proposed) [1.4.4-2ubuntu2]
[07:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pacemaker [source] (focal-proposed) [2.0.3-3ubuntu3]
[07:22] <seb128> sil2100, hey
[07:22] <seb128> do you know how is update_excuses.yaml generated? was the generation changed recently to special case the new riscv entries?
[07:22] <seb128> those are missing a policyinfo and the by team proposed migration doesn't like it, it fails to update for a day now
[07:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-aws [sync] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1008.8]
[07:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-gcp [sync] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1008.8]
[07:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-meta-aws [sync] (focal-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>8.10]
[07:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-meta-gcp [sync] (focal-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>8.8]
[07:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-meta-oracle [sync] (focal-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>8.8]
[07:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-restricted-modules-aws [sync] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1008.8]
[07:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-restricted-modules-gcp [sync] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1008.8]
[07:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-signed-azure [sync] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1009.9]
[07:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-signed-oracle [sync] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1008.8]
[07:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-azure [sync] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1009.9]
[07:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-meta-azure [sync] (focal-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>9.10]
[07:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-oracle [sync] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1008.8]
[07:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-restricted-modules-oracle [sync] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1008.8]
[07:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-kvm [sync] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1007.7]
[07:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-restricted-modules-azure [sync] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1009.9]
[07:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-meta-kvm [sync] (focal-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>7.7]
[07:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted linux-signed-gcp [sync] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1008.8]
[07:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted update-manager [source] (focal-proposed) [1:20.04.3]
[07:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed/main) [5.3.0-47.39] (core, kernel)
[07:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.4.0-178.208] (core, kernel)
[07:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [s390x] (eoan-proposed/main) [5.3.0-47.39] (core, kernel)
[07:27] <RikMills> morning. I don't have anything urgent in the queue. howver, from the ubuntutestingweek chat, I think kylin are keen to have  ukui-control-center through so their setting app does not segfault on start and testers can properly test
[07:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (eoan-proposed/main) [5.3.0-47.39] (core, kernel)
[07:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted engrampa [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.24.0-2]
[07:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [arm64] (eoan-proposed/main) [5.3.0-47.39] (core, kernel)
[07:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.4.0-178.208]
[07:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron [source] (focal-proposed) [2:16.0.0~b3~git2020032420.a0e1b5804e-0ubuntu4]
[07:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nova [source] (focal-proposed) [2:21.0.0~b3~git2020032515.35240b0d8c-0ubuntu2]
[07:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [5.3.0-47.39]
[07:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed) [5.3.0-47.39]
[07:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted colord-kde [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.5.0-4]
[07:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [arm64] (eoan-proposed) [5.3.0-47.39]
[07:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [s390x] (eoan-proposed) [5.3.0-47.39]
[07:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ukui-control-center [sync] (focal-proposed) [2.0.3-1]
[07:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ukui-panel [sync] (focal-proposed) [2.0.5-1]
[07:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted kylin-nm [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.2.3-1]
[07:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ukui-media [sync] (focal-proposed) [2.0.3-1]
[07:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted peony [sync] (focal-proposed) [2.1.2-1]
[07:39] <handsome_feng> RikMills and release team: Thanks! :)
[07:39] <sil2100> yw o/
[07:47] <RikMills> :)
[07:57] <tjaalton> sil2100: filed bug 1871315 for r-p-d
[08:29] <doko> tjaalton: reading https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/darktable/+bug/1871049, why is u-a subscribed?
[08:31] <tjaalton> doko: it's a FFe?
[08:31] <tjaalton> ahh
[08:31] <tjaalton> sorry :D
[08:32] <tjaalton> fixed
[08:32] <tjaalton> s/archive/release/, same for r-p-d
[08:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: gfxboot-theme-ubuntu (focal-proposed/main) [0.23.0 => 0.23.1] (core)
[08:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ukui-sidebar (focal-proposed/universe) [1.1.0-1 => 1.1.2-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[08:39] <Laney> seb128: it looks like those "/<arch>" items don't have to have an age for some reason
[08:42] <seb128> Laney, so the by_team script needs to be fixed to handle that case?
[08:42] <seb128> well the age is not the only issue, I made it return 0 for those without an age yesterday but had another error
[08:43] <seb128> unsure if the items are buggy/shouldn't lack those info and that what needs to be fixed or if the tool needs to deal with those new records
[08:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qt5-ukui-platformtheme (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0.2-0ubuntu1 => 1.0.3-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[08:44] <Laney> It looks like binary only migrations don't have (all) the policies run for them
[08:44] <Laney> I think assume the yaml is ok and make the script deal with it
[08:45] <seb128> k
[08:45]  * seb128 adds to the todo
[08:45] <seb128> I will try to poke a bit later but if someone has the free cycles earlier and want to beat me please do
[08:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: util-linux (focal-proposed/main) [2.34-0.1ubuntu8 => 2.34-0.1ubuntu9] (core, i386-whitelist)
[09:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libdmx (focal-proposed/main) [1:1.1.4-1 => 1:1.1.4-2] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[09:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qt5-ukui-platformtheme [source] (focal-proposed) [1.0.3-0ubuntu1]
[09:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted gfxboot-theme-ubuntu [source] (focal-proposed) [0.23.1]
[09:26] <doko> Eickmeyer[m]: I need to remove displaycal, removed python2 dependencies
[09:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-azure [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1009.9] (core, kernel)
[09:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1008.8] (core, kernel)
[09:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (focal-proposed/main) [5.4.0-1008.8] (core, kernel)
[09:51] <Laney> seb128: proposed a merge if you don't see the email, seems to work for me
[09:52] <seb128> Laney, thanks! will look in a bit
[10:04] <cking> hi there, a SRU for stress-ng in bionic is pending an upload, 'Not touching package due to block request by freeze', but a re-test on armhf has now passed and there are a few bugs (1858858, 1853832) waiting on this
[10:07] <seb128> Laney, k, merged, pushed and updated the checkout on the server
[10:09] <seb128> Laney, bah, looks like you (force?) pushed other changes to the same location while I was merging
[10:10] <Laney> did not force
[10:10] <Laney> you must have just been too quick for me
[10:10] <seb128> ah, I guess the launchpad UI is just smart enough and removed the commit that got merge from the mp
[10:11] <seb128> Laney, k, 272 as well now :)
[10:12] <Laney> thanks!
[10:13] <seb128> thank *you* :-)
[10:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python2.7 (focal-proposed/universe) [2.7.17-1ubuntu6 => 2.7.18~rc1-1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)
[10:40] <doko> RikMills: ^^^ apparently python2 is still in the kubuntu package set. can we fix that for final focal?
[10:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted firefox [source] (focal-proposed) [75.0+build3-0ubuntu1]
[10:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xserver-xorg-video-qxl [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.1.5+git20200331-1]
[11:02] <RikMills> doko: its not in the supported seed. must have been added by the packageset generation scripts at some point
[11:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted util-linux [source] (focal-proposed) [2.34-0.1ubuntu9]
[11:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: freeipa (focal-proposed/primary) [4.8.6-1ubuntu1]
[11:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dropwatch [riscv64] (focal-proposed) [1.5.1-2]
[11:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted freeipa [source] (focal-proposed) [4.8.6-1ubuntu1]
[11:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-gwidgetsrgtk2 [amd64] (focal-proposed) [0.0-86-2]
[11:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted xubuntu-community-artwork [amd64] (focal-proposed) [20.04.0]
[11:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted eslint [sync] (focal-proposed) [5.0.1~dfsg-4]
[11:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-gwidgetstcltk [amd64] (focal-proposed) [0.0-55-2]
[11:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pop-icon-theme [amd64] (focal-proposed) [2.1.0~1571158475~19.10~6bf9347]
[11:20] <bluesabre> Yay!
[11:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: freeipa [s390x] (focal-proposed/none) [4.8.6-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[11:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: freeipa [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/none) [4.8.6-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[11:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: freeipa [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [4.8.6-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[11:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: freeipa [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [4.8.6-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[11:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: freeipa [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [4.8.6-1ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[11:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xubuntu-artwork (focal-proposed/universe) [20.04 => 20.04.1] (ubuntustudio, xubuntu)
[11:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: artikulate (focal-proposed/universe) [4:19.12.3-0ubuntu1 => 4:19.12.3-0ubuntu2] (kubuntu)
[11:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted freeipa [amd64] (focal-proposed) [4.8.6-1ubuntu1]
[11:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted freeipa [armhf] (focal-proposed) [4.8.6-1ubuntu1]
[11:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted freeipa [s390x] (focal-proposed) [4.8.6-1ubuntu1]
[11:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted freeipa [arm64] (focal-proposed) [4.8.6-1ubuntu1]
[11:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted freeipa [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [4.8.6-1ubuntu1]
[11:39] <RikMills> ^^ artikulate fix to build for riscv64
[11:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted artikulate [source] (focal-proposed) [4:19.12.3-0ubuntu2]
[11:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: binutils (focal-proposed/main) [2.34-5ubuntu1 => 2.34-6ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[11:54] <bluesabre> Hello release team! Please accept the xubuntu-artwork package above which includes our 20.04 wallpaper. In my excitement, I jumped ahead and uploaded it before the UIFe bug (lp #1871357) was reviewed... (in the past, we've been given the go ahead for our artwork since it doesn't affect any existing translations or documentation)
[11:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted binutils [source] (focal-proposed) [2.34-6ubuntu1]
[12:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: glslang (focal-proposed/universe) [8.13.3559-3 => 8.13.3559-4] (i386-whitelist) (sync)
[12:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-rsgcc [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0.6-2] (no packageset)
[12:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-rsgcc [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0.6-2] (no packageset)
[12:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-rsgcc [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0.6-2] (no packageset)
[12:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: systemd (focal-proposed/main) [245.2-1ubuntu3 => 245.4-2ubuntu1] (core, i386-whitelist)
[12:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-glanceclient (focal-proposed/main) [1:2.17.0-0ubuntu2 => 1:2.17.0-0ubuntu3] (openstack, ubuntu-server)
[12:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-cran-rsgcc [riscv64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0.6-2] (no packageset)
[13:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libaccounts-qt (focal-proposed/universe) [1.15+17.04.20161104.1-0ubuntu2 => 1.15+17.04.20161104.1-0ubuntu3] (kubuntu)
[13:36] <mfo> seb128, thanks for the util-linux review/upload for focal.
[13:36] <seb128> mfo, np!
[13:38] <RikMills> seb128 mfo, thanks to you both!
[13:38] <seb128> np :-)
[13:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ukui-menu (focal-proposed/universe) [2.0.4-1 => 2.0.5-1] (ubuntukylin) (sync)
[13:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-manager (focal-proposed/main) [1:20.04.3 => 1:20.04.4] (core)
[13:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: kylin-display-switch (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0.3-1 => 1.0.4-1] (ubuntukylin) (sync)
[13:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-rsgcc [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.0.6-2]
[13:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-rsgcc [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [1.0.6-2]
[13:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-rsgcc [armhf] (focal-proposed) [1.0.6-2]
[13:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-cran-rsgcc [riscv64] (focal-proposed) [1.0.6-2]
[13:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ukui-greeter (focal-proposed/universe) [1.2.3-1 => 1.2.5-1] (ubuntukylin) (sync)
[14:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: vala (focal-proposed/universe) [0.48.2-1 => 0.48.3-1] (i386-whitelist, ubuntu-desktop) (sync)
[14:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libcmis (focal-proposed/main) [0.5.2-1build1 => 0.5.2-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[14:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected libcmis [source] (focal-proposed) [0.5.2-1ubuntu1]
[14:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libcmis (focal-proposed/main) [0.5.2-1build1 => 0.5.2-1ubuntu1] (ubuntu-desktop)
[14:35] <RikMills> wgr@nt's libaccounts-qt in the queue should help more KDE/qt things build for riscv64. if anyone can let that in, would be great :)
[15:19] <seb128> vorlon, did you remove the colord/i386 hint in 4724 on purpose or by mistake? it's still failing https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/colord/focal/i386 and blocking other things now
[15:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-azure [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1009.9]
[15:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oracle [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1008.8]
[15:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-gcp [amd64] (focal-proposed) [5.4.0-1008.8]
[16:07] <rbalint> sil2100, vorlon please check systemd in the focal queue
[16:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntustudio-live (focal-proposed/universe) [1.3 => 1.4] (ubuntustudio)
[16:12] <Eickmeyer[m]> ^ Please accept/approve, fixes the package selection plugin bug (removes the plugin)
[16:12] <Eickmeyer[m]> In Ubiquity
[16:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: freeipa (focal-proposed/universe) [4.8.6-1ubuntu1 => 4.8.6-1ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[16:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted freeipa [source] (focal-proposed) [4.8.6-1ubuntu2]
[17:02] <rbalint> juliank, Laney what version of autodep8 is running on the autopkgtest infra? i suspect it does not have the latest 0.22ubuntu1 because dkms tests are failing
[17:02] <rbalint> like broadcom-sta
[17:02] <Laney> https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-release/+git/autodep8/+ref/master that
[17:04] <bdmurray> vorlon, Laney, sil2100: I've reviewed update-manager for focal and its good if you could accept it for me that'd be great.
[17:04] <Laney> sure
[17:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted update-manager [source] (focal-proposed) [1:20.04.4]
[17:08] <bdmurray> Laney: xubuntu-artwork looks good too, I also checked the image
[17:19] <sil2100> bdmurray: on it
[17:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted xubuntu-artwork [source] (focal-proposed) [20.04.1]
[17:50] <rbalint> Laney, please cherry-pick https://code.launchpad.net/~rbalint/+git/autodep8 to lp:~ubuntu-release/+git/autodep8  , lp does not allow opening a merge proposal
[17:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libtomcrypt (focal-proposed/universe) [1.18.2-2 => 1.18.2-3] (kubuntu) (sync)
[17:53] <RikMills> build fix. will let riscv64 build ^
[17:54] <RikMills> and that is in build dep chain for plasma-nm
[18:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxcfs (focal-proposed/universe) [4.0.1-0ubuntu2 => 4.0.2-0ubuntu1] (edubuntu)
[18:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted lxcfs [source] (focal-proposed) [4.0.2-0ubuntu1]
[18:31] <Eickmeyer[m]> Question: Is there a way to test an image built from a seed locally?
[18:41] <rafaeldtinoco> Could I please get FFe feedback/approval for bugs LP: #1866385 (kronosnet) and LP: #1866383 (resource-agents) ?
[18:41] <rafaeldtinoco> I'm stabilizing HA stack and need those
[19:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: apport (focal-proposed/main) [2.20.11-0ubuntu24 => 2.20.11-0ubuntu25] (core, i386-whitelist)
[19:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted glance [source] (eoan-proposed) [2:19.0.2-0ubuntu1]
[19:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron [source] (eoan-proposed) [2:15.0.2-0ubuntu1]
[19:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted neutron-fwaas [source] (eoan-proposed) [1:15.0.1-0ubuntu1]
[19:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: alsa-tools (focal-proposed/universe) [1.1.7-1build1 => 1.1.7-1ubuntu1] (ubuntustudio)
[19:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted horizon [source] (eoan-proposed) [3:16.1.0-0ubuntu1]
[20:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python2.7 (focal-proposed/universe) [2.7.17-1ubuntu6 => 2.7.18~rc1-2] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu) (sync)
[20:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected python2.7 [source] (focal-proposed) [2.7.18~rc1-1]
[21:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xubuntu-artwork (focal-proposed/universe) [20.04.1 => 20.04.2] (ubuntustudio, xubuntu)
[21:18] <bluesabre> Hello release team! Please accept the above xubuntu-artwork package. We uploaded the wrong version of our new wallpaper this morning... and now we're back with the correct one. :)
[21:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nova [source] (eoan-proposed) [2:20.1.1-0ubuntu1]
[21:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ceilometer [source] (eoan-proposed) [1:13.1.0-0ubuntu1]
[21:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted cinder [source] (eoan-proposed) [2:15.1.0-0ubuntu1]
[21:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: node-rollup-pluginutils (focal-proposed/universe) [2.8.2-7build2 => 2.8.2-7build3] (no packageset)
[21:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: node-rollup (focal-proposed/universe) [1.12.0-2build2 => 1.12.0-2build3] (no packageset)
[21:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted node-rollup-pluginutils [source] (focal-proposed) [2.8.2-7build3]
[21:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted node-rollup [source] (focal-proposed) [1.12.0-2build3]
[21:48] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted json-glib [source] (eoan-proposed) [1.4.4-2ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>]
[21:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted json-glib [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.4.2-3ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>]
[21:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.3.0-47.39~18.04.1] (kernel)
[22:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.3.0-47.39~18.04.1] (kernel)
[22:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.3.0-47.39~18.04.1] (kernel)
[22:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-97.98] (core, kernel)
[22:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem-5.6 [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [5.6.0-1007.7] (no packageset)
[22:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-97.98] (core, kernel)
[22:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: node-os-locale (focal-proposed/universe) [2.0.0-1 => 4.0.0-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[22:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: node-file-entry-cache (focal-proposed/universe) [5.0.1+~2.0.1+~2.0.0+~1.0.0+~2.0.1-4 => 5.0.1+~2.0.1+~2.0.0+~1.0.0+~2.0.1-5] (no packageset) (sync)
[22:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted node-file-entry-cache [sync] (focal-proposed) [5.0.1+~2.0.1+~2.0.0+~1.0.0+~2.0.1-5]
[22:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted node-os-locale [sync] (focal-proposed) [4.0.0-1]
[22:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: node-pump (focal-proposed/universe) [3.0.0-1 => 3.0.0-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[22:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: node-espree (focal-proposed/universe) [6.0.0+ds-2 => 6.0.0+ds-3] (no packageset) (sync)
[22:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: node-minimatch (focal-proposed/universe) [3.0.4-3 => 3.0.4-4] (no packageset) (sync)
[22:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: node-esrecurse (focal-proposed/universe) [4.2.0-1 => 4.2.1-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[22:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted node-espree [sync] (focal-proposed) [6.0.0+ds-3]
[22:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted node-minimatch [sync] (focal-proposed) [3.0.4-4]
[22:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: node-p-limit (focal-proposed/universe) [1.1.0-1 => 2.2.2-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[22:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted node-esrecurse [sync] (focal-proposed) [4.2.1-1]
[22:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: node-resolve (focal-proposed/universe) [1.5.0-1 => 1.15.1-3] (no packageset) (sync)
[22:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted node-pump [sync] (focal-proposed) [3.0.0-2]
[22:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted node-p-limit [sync] (focal-proposed) [2.2.2-1]
[22:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: node-esquery (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0.1-1 => 1.1.0-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[22:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: node-wordwrap (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-1 => 1.0.0-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[22:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted node-resolve [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.15.1-3]
[22:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: should.js (focal-proposed/universe) [13.2.3~dfsg-2 => 13.2.3~dfsg-3] (no packageset) (sync)
[22:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: node-mkdirp (focal-proposed/universe) [0.5.1-1 => 0.5.1-2] (no packageset) (sync)
[22:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted node-esquery [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.1.0-1]
[22:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted node-wordwrap [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.0.0-2]
[22:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted node-mkdirp [sync] (focal-proposed) [0.5.1-2]
[22:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted should.js [sync] (focal-proposed) [13.2.3~dfsg-3]
[22:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: node-path-is-absolute (focal-proposed/universe) [1.0.0-1 => 2.0.0-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[22:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: node-has-flag (focal-proposed/universe) [4.0.0-1 => 4.0.0-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[22:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: node-inherits (focal-proposed/universe) [2.0.4-1 => 2.0.4-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[22:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted node-has-flag [sync] (focal-proposed) [4.0.0-1]
[22:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted node-path-is-absolute [sync] (focal-proposed) [2.0.0-1]
[22:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: node-minimist (focal-proposed/universe) [1.2.0-1 => 1.2.5-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[22:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted node-inherits [sync] (focal-proposed) [2.0.4-1]
[22:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: node-function-bind (focal-proposed/universe) [1.1.1+repack-1 => 1.1.1+repack-1] (no packageset) (sync)
[22:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected node-function-bind [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.1.1+repack-1]
[22:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted node-minimist [sync] (focal-proposed) [1.2.5-1]
[23:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntustudio-icon-theme (focal-proposed/universe) [0.20 => 0.21] (ubuntustudio)
[23:02] <Eickmeyer[m]> ^ Please approve/accept, fixes bug 1871508
[23:28] <mwhudson> if someone could accept apport, that would be grand
[23:39] <vorlon> rbalint: systemd in the focal queue includes Debian changes to revert seccomp support on systemd, whereas the version in -proposed built fine on riscv64 with seccomp support, so nack, rejecting
[23:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected systemd [source] (focal-proposed) [245.4-2ubuntu1]