[00:04]  * penguin42 wonders where the convert to question thing lives
[00:05] <penguin42> ah - there
[00:08] <charlie-tca> top right
[00:11] <penguin42> bah, keep getting lp oops when I try it
[00:13] <charlie-tca> oh, yeah
[00:13] <charlie-tca> I got that too, finally gave up on it
[00:13] <penguin42> it's managed it - with a rather confusing set of 'i's on it 'This bug could not be converted into a question' directly above 'This bug report was converted into a question: question #145177'
[00:13] <charlie-tca> I am hoping it goes through, since everything else that does that actually happens, even if it oops
[00:14] <penguin42> 3rd time lucky
[00:14] <charlie-tca> Great. Maybe mine never converted then, since I gave up resending it
[00:14] <penguin42> I copied the text into a text editor on the 2nd try so I didn't have to retype it for a 3rd time
[00:16] <charlie-tca> I just looped over and over, and finally gave up
[00:23] <penguin42> bah, 503s from launchpadlibrarian now
[00:39] <penguin42> charlie-tca: Can you set bug 716927 to Low ?
[00:39] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 716927 in gnome-disk-utility (Ubuntu) "USB connection speed is reported as MB/s when it should be Mb/s (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/716927
[00:40] <penguin42> actually, it's a dupe - let me tidy that up first
[07:51] <slicer> Hi. Can someone mark #714701 as a duplicate/depending on #714696 ?
[07:58] <vish> bug #714701 , bug #714696
[07:58] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 714701 in mumble (Ubuntu) "Setting Keyboard Shortcut in mumble will not accept input (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/714701
[07:58] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 714696 in libxi (Ubuntu) "Mumble Push to Talk does not work on Natty (affects: 1) (heat: 16)" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/714696
[08:02] <vish> slicer: if you feel it is a dup, you can mark it yourself(anyone can).. click on the "Mark as Duplicate" on the top right
[08:02] <vish> and enter the bug number in the pop-up
[08:03] <slicer> vish: I must be blind. Thanks :)
[08:03] <vish> np.. :)
[08:05] <vish> slicer: seems you know about mumble? (and are the upstream author?) you can ask join bugcontrol too, to set bug importance of the bugs or close bugs as wontfix
[08:06] <vish> slicer: if you are interested in triaging the bugs in ubuntu, you need to contact jcastro with your info and he'll add you to bug control
[08:06] <vish> !bugcontrol
[08:06] <ubot4> Factoid 'bugcontrol' not found
[08:06] <slicer> vish: I was in bugcontrol for a long time, but my membership expired while I was on vacation. Seeing as I really did more requests for renewing the membership than actually marking things as wontfix, I'm not sure it makes sense to reapply :)
[08:06] <vish> cool! :)
[08:08] <slicer> And yes, I'm the mumble upstream.
[08:13] <vish> slicer: neat! well, its not for wontfix alone , but being upstream and being active triaging in Ubuntu, bugcontrol membership is something that is good to have, (not to overlook the fact that upstream is active in lp triage) if the renewal is something that is being a bother, then we can probably have the membership period longer or check the policy regarding that..
[08:17] <slicer> vish: That would be a big help. I think it's 6 months or so now?
[08:18] <vish> slicer: it starts with a shorter period initially, and once the member has been active then the period gets longer
[08:19] <vish> its initially 3m, then 6m and then 1 yr i think or maybe 3m » 1yr
[08:19] <slicer> Aha. I haven't really been that active, so that would probably explain it :)
[08:19] <vish> :)
[08:20] <slicer> I'll have a look tomorrow and see if I can find that expiry mail again and reapply.
[08:20] <slicer> Need some sleep first though. Thanks for the info :)
[08:20] <vish> slicer: awesome! :)
[08:20] <vish> np..
[13:24] <nigelb> vish: hey, is shanefagan on IRC?
[13:24] <nigelb> err, what's his nick
[13:24] <vish> fagan
[13:25] <nigelb> thanks
[13:25] <nigelb> darn, not online.
[15:29] <shankhs> Hi , the bug 642577 is no longer reproducible, should the status be changed to invalid?
[15:29] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 642577 in openoffice.org (Ubuntu) "Menu text in OpenOffice are obscured in Maverick (affects: 1) (heat: 8)" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/642577
[15:34]  * penguin42 looks
[15:36] <penguin42> shankhs: I'm not sure; I'd mark it as fixed released but with a comment saying that you're not sure when - if it still breaks on Lucid and lucid is lts is OOo included in the long term support?
[15:47] <shankhs> penguin42: OOo is in Lucid so I am going to change the status to "Fix Released" with comment that "Not sure when - not sure if it still an issue in Lucid". Will that be fine? I am new so confirming , trying not to give any misinformation.
[15:48] <penguin42> yeh I'm not sure what the right thing to do is in that situation
[15:55] <shankhs> penguin42: thanks
[15:57] <shankhs> I will go ahead and make those changes , if somebody finds it not right they can correct it anytime right?
[15:57] <penguin42> yeh
[15:59] <charlie-tca> I sometimes use https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Responses#Fixed%20in%20Development%20release%20while%20still%20existing%20in%20a%20previous%20release , modifying it to Ubuntu 10.10 instead of natty, in these cases
[16:00] <charlie-tca> We can do a backport or sru to LTS releases
[16:01] <penguin42> oh yeh that's kind of a useful response
[16:02] <shankhs> ok  should I copy paste the comments from wiki?
[16:02] <shankhs> with changes to maverick
[16:03] <charlie-tca> yup, that is a good way to do it
[16:03] <shankhs> Can I delete the comment in the bug page?
[16:05] <charlie-tca> if you already applied it, you can not delete
[16:05] <charlie-tca> You can simply say add the new comment
[16:07] <shankhs> penguin42: charlie-tca : Done, thanks guys
[16:08] <vish> charlie-tca: i dont think shankhs has confirmed that the bug is fixed
[16:08] <vish> shankhs: has the bug been fixed? or are you just closing OOo bugs?
[16:08] <charlie-tca> vish: he said it is no longer reproducable in Maverick
[16:09] <shankhs> yeh
[16:09] <charlie-tca> I read that as fixed in maverick
[16:09]  * vish couldnt find that in the scrollback.. or maybe i -re-joined late
[16:10]  * charlie-tca hates when he does that
[16:11] <vish> shankhs: afaik, OOo in lucid and maverick hasnt changed a lot.. let me check the versions just to be sure..
[16:17] <penguin42> vish: But it might be a graphics driverism rather than OOo
[16:20] <vish> penguin42: i seem to have missed part of the conversation.. i only have from "  <shankhs> penguin42: OOo is in Lucid .." but  timestamp says i had rejoined 10mins.. so i may have missed something :)
[16:20] <vish> 10mins earlier*
[16:21] <penguin42> vish: Original bug was some issue with OOo on Lucid misrendering something; it's apparently working in Maverick; the fact that OOo hasnt' changed much doesn't mean that whatever underlying thing that caused the error might have changed
[16:21] <vish> penguin42: ah! cool.. thanks :)
[16:22]  * vish wanders off and lets folks do their work.. ;)  lalala  lalaaa
[17:56] <shankhs> I worked on some of the bugs of LO and OOo and I would love to continue to work for the LO and OOo package to know it better. So what should I do next?  Please advice. Thank you
[17:59] <charlie-tca> take a look at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBugDay/20110210
[17:59] <charlie-tca> it gives a few that can use help
[18:15] <shankhs> charlie-tca: thanks
[18:24] <charlie-tca> You are welcome