[00:39] <BUGabundo> ti manhana
[07:18] <asac> bdmurray: gratias
[07:18] <micahg> asac: bdmurray: thanks
[07:18] <micahg> asac: I already flipped one non-security issue
[07:43] <micahg> question, system menu says Minefield for ff3.5 but about menu says Shiretoko
[09:19] <gnomefreak> people suck. "Due to a recent increase in the number of accounts being created for abusive purposes we have decided to suspend new user registrations until further notice."
[09:19] <gnomefreak> i need one more email address
[09:26] <fta> so sloowwww
[09:29] <fta> asac, jcastro: Mark is not aware of our dailes :( /me so sad
[09:46] <gnomefreak> what is a good free email service?
[09:46]  * gnomefreak cant find one that seems to be any good outside of gmail
[09:48] <asac> hehe
[09:48] <asac> yeah. now its working better
[09:49] <asac> fta: i will send him a mail and mention you explicitly ... so yeah.
[09:49] <asac> gnomefreak: gmail
[09:49] <asac> ;)
[09:49] <asac> ?
[09:50] <gnomefreak> asac: yeah i have 7_ gmail accounts im looking for another one :)
[09:51] <gnomefreak> everything i find is <250MB
[09:54] <gnomefreak> looking for something profesional for the domain nametrying to stay away from hotmail,yahoo,aim/aol/ect..
[10:15] <gnomefreak> gmail it is
[10:17] <asac> gnomefreak: ack
[10:17] <asac> fta: 08:43 < micahg> question, system menu says Minefield for ff3.5 but about menu says Shiretoko
[10:17] <asac> is that a bug in our build system (e.g. use minefield for "pre" ?
[10:18] <fta_> hm, let me look
[10:18] <gnomefreak> thought minefield was 3.6
[10:18] <asac> gnomefreak: yes. its a bug and it was shiretoko when 3.5 was still beta
[10:18] <gnomefreak> asac: ah
[10:22] <fta> asac, yep, that's why
[10:24] <fta> asac, imho, it should use the real branding now, it's almost a RC
[10:27] <asac> hmm
[10:28] <asac> fta: but before doing that we should review all our patches imo and get ubufox working
[10:28] <fta> asac, sure
[10:29] <asac> let me check whats up with xul 1.9.1 branch
[10:29] <gnomefreak> make sure extensions are updated to use 3.5
[10:32] <gnomefreak> at least we are going to need to if not already
[10:32] <asac> gnomefreak: yeah. but that has to happen during this cycle anyway imo
[10:32] <gnomefreak> true
[10:32] <asac> also we need to move all rdepends that dont go to webkit to use 1.9.1
[10:44] <asac> fta: so lets schedule a session on firefox 3.5 by default in karmic i guess
[10:59] <gnomefreak> did you hit your first session yet?
[11:10] <gnomefreak> why the hell doesnt TB3 use wrapping this is getting annoying everything being on one line
[11:30] <asac> gnomefreak: i was in a session ... now doing some pair programming with awe
[11:32] <gnomefreak> asac: ubufox when listing possible plugins does it use random choice?
[11:33] <asac> gnomefreak: no ... it uses a deterministic choice ... why?
[11:35] <gnomefreak> asac: they want flashplayer to be first in list.
[11:35] <asac> gnomefreak: oh yeah. thats a bug. do you have a id?
[11:35] <gnomefreak> bug 371800
[11:36] <gnomefreak> saim guessing it is due to 64bit? but he doesnt state what arch
[11:36] <gnomefreak> asac: im guessing ....
[11:38] <asac> gnomefreak: doesnt matter ... we had a hack in the plugin db so that adobe flash shows up first. that was forgotten to be moved to flashplugin-installer (after rename)
[11:38] <gnomefreak> ah ok
[11:54] <gnomefreak> asac: the above bug should fix the intrepid>jaunty upgrade flash problem too.
[11:54] <gnomefreak> i made note on the above bug report
[12:13] <gnomefreak> ok enough work for now
[12:13]  * gnomefreak smoke
[13:16] <fta> @time
[13:16] <fta> !ping
[13:16] <fta> :)
[13:17] <fta> anyone using gwibber trunk here?
[13:17] <fta> BUGabundo, ?
[14:11] <BUGabundo> guud afternoon
[14:11] <BUGabundo> fta yesterday I was
[14:12] <BUGabundo> bzr trunk
[14:12] <BUGabundo> working but crashing a lot
[14:12] <BUGabundo> haven't booted laptopd today, so can't be sure of any changes
[14:12] <BUGabundo> when I get to the office, ill boot it and see what's new
[15:31] <RainCT> where is fta? :P
[15:32] <micahg> RainCT: UDS?
[15:32] <BUGabundo> yep
[15:34] <RainCT> I know
[15:34] <RainCT> But I haven't seen him :P
[15:35] <RainCT> I've seen asac twice (but still have to say "hi" to him :P), but not fta
[15:35] <BUGabundo1> lol
[15:35] <BUGabundo1> lucky you
[15:35] <BUGabundo1> I haven't seen *anyone*
[15:35] <BUGabundo1> take pics ok ?
[15:59] <BUGabundo> hey fta
[16:00] <BUGabundo> fta: RainCT is looking for you offline
[16:00] <BUGabundo> (2009-05-25 14:12:57) freenode: fta yesterday I was
[16:00] <BUGabundo> (2009-05-25 14:12:57) freenode: bzr trunk
[16:00] <BUGabundo> (2009-05-25 14:13:03) freenode: working but crashing a lot
[16:00] <BUGabundo> (2009-05-25 14:13:22) freenode: haven't booted laptopd today, so can't be sure of any changes
[16:00] <BUGabundo> (2009-05-25 14:13:36) freenode: when I get to the office, ill boot it and see what's new
[16:01] <fta> yeah, crappy network
[16:01] <fta> much crappier than the last few uds
[16:01] <fta> imho
[16:02] <BUGabundo1> fta: should be better now
[16:02] <BUGabundo1> with all those cisco APs
[16:02] <fta> dtchen, are you in a session / busy right now?
[16:03] <fta> BUGabundo, not really, irc seems fine, web too but i can't post anything using gwibber
[16:03] <fta> or is gwibber crappy too?
[16:03] <BUGabundo1> gwbbier fault
[16:04] <BUGabundo1> mine freezes a lot
[16:04] <BUGabundo1> going back to 302?
[16:04] <BUGabundo1> or even 0.9x ?
[16:04] <fta> mine doesn't, but it's really bad with a crappy network
[16:04] <fta> pickup any older version from the daily ppa, and stick it
[16:05] <BUGabundo1> gwibber (as many other app) handle *very* bad under poor conectivity
[16:05] <BUGabundo1> yesterday trunk is lasting for now
[16:05] <BUGabundo1> may upgrade to last one for small fixes
[16:07] <BUGabundo1> Rev 316: Added support for deleting Twitter and Identi.ca message
[16:19] <fta> grrr, i/o errors
[16:20] <fta> bad kernel (resume)
[16:20] <BUGabundo1> LOL
[16:22] <asac> fta: where are you now?
[16:23] <BUGabundo1> asac: don't think so
[16:23] <BUGabundo1> just a gosht
[16:25] <fta> asac, room 9 (test session moved from room 6, too small)
[16:26] <BUGabundo1> LOL
[16:44] <asac> fta: rainct is here ... we are sitting in the main hall (prism)
[16:45] <fta> hm, im' in a session :P
[16:46] <fta> asac, could you discuss something else? ;)
[16:47] <asac> fta: yeah. we will figure something
[17:51] <micahg> Is TB 2 still receiving patches from upstream?
[17:51] <BUGabundo> kem hummok
[17:52] <micahg> ??
[17:53] <BUGabundo> nvm
[17:53] <BUGabundo> wrong wind
[20:14] <micahg> BUGabundo: are you using TB3?
[20:15] <BUGabundo> don't use it
[20:15] <micahg> ok
[20:16] <micahg> BUGabundo: can you look at bug 191006?
[20:16] <BUGabundo> can't test
[20:17] <micahg> OK
[20:17] <micahg> I just wanted feedback for an idea
[20:18] <BUGabundo> shoot
[20:18] <micahg> I was thinking of converting that bug to a wishlist for an RSS feed limit
[20:18] <micahg> on max downloads per feed
[20:18] <micahg> at one shot
[20:19] <micahg> I can't find anything like it on LP or Bugzilla
[20:20] <BUGabundo> didn't get it
[20:21] <micahg> my idea or the bug?
[20:22] <BUGabundo> idea
[20:22] <micahg> ok, the guy in the bug had an issue that he added a sself created feed with 250k entries
[20:22] <BUGabundo> autch
[20:23] <micahg> so, he seemed to need a feature that would limit hte amount of entries retrieved per feed per download
[20:25] <BUGabundo> why not just use page2rss?
[20:25] <micahg> is that an extension?
[20:25] <BUGabundo> site/service
[20:25] <micahg> it doesn't seem like an unreasonable request for TB
[23:26] <mbana> asac: you back?