[00:08] <sil2100> rbasak, RAOF: thanks guys o/
[01:46] <Laney> now autopkgtest /running is going to show the time a job was submitted to the queue
[01:46] <Laney> which you can use to see if a request is going around forever
[01:59] <sil2100> \o/
[04:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.38.0+dfsg0.2+llvm-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[04:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.38.0+dfsg0.2+llvm-0ubuntu1]
[04:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [i386] (focal-proposed) [1.38.0+dfsg0.2+llvm-0ubuntu1]
[04:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [s390x] (focal-proposed) [1.38.0+dfsg0.2+llvm-0ubuntu1]
[04:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [arm64] (focal-proposed) [1.38.0+dfsg0.2+llvm-0ubuntu1]
[04:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rustc [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [1.38.0+dfsg0.2+llvm-0ubuntu1]
[05:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: dnsenum [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.3.0-2] (no packageset)
[05:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: editobj3 [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.1+ds1-2] (no packageset)
[05:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: phonon [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [4:4.11.1-3] (kubuntu)
[05:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: phonon [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [4:4.11.1-3] (kubuntu)
[05:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: phonon [i386] (focal-proposed/universe) [4:4.11.1-3] (kubuntu)
[05:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: phonon [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [4:4.11.1-3] (kubuntu)
[05:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd (focal-proposed/main) [1.3.3-3 => 1.3.3-3] (core)
[05:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd (focal-proposed/main) [1.3.3-3 => 1.3.3-3] (core)
[05:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: phonon [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [4:4.11.1-3] (kubuntu)
[05:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd (focal-proposed/main) [1.3.3-3 => 1.3.3-3] (core)
[05:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: phonon [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [4:4.11.1-3] (kubuntu)
[05:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: fwupd (focal-proposed/main) [1.3.3-3 => 1.3.3-3] (core)
[05:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted dnsenum [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.3.0-2]
[05:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted phonon [amd64] (focal-proposed) [4:4.11.1-3]
[05:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted phonon [armhf] (focal-proposed) [4:4.11.1-3]
[05:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted phonon [ppc64el] (focal-proposed) [4:4.11.1-3]
[05:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted editobj3 [amd64] (focal-proposed) [0.1+ds1-2]
[05:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted phonon [i386] (focal-proposed) [4:4.11.1-3]
[05:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted phonon [arm64] (focal-proposed) [4:4.11.1-3]
[05:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted phonon [s390x] (focal-proposed) [4:4.11.1-3]
[08:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-edge [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.3.0-23.25~18.04.1] (kernel)
[08:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-1064.73] (kernel)
[08:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [s390x] (eoan-proposed/main) [5.3.0-23.25] (core, kernel)
[08:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-edge [s390x] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.3.0-23.25~18.04.1] (kernel)
[08:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-70.79] (core, kernel)
[08:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-edge [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.3.0-23.25~18.04.1] (kernel)
[08:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.0.0-36.39~18.04.1] (kernel)
[08:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed/main) [5.3.0-23.25] (core, kernel)
[08:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.0.0-36.39~18.04.1] (kernel)
[08:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-oem-osp1 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [5.0.0-1028.32] (no packageset)
[08:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-edge [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-23.25~18.04.1]
[08:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-edge [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-23.25~18.04.1]
[08:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-36.39~18.04.1]
[08:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-1064.73]
[08:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (eoan-proposed) [5.3.0-23.25]
[08:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-edge [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-23.25~18.04.1]
[08:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-oem-osp1 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-1028.32]
[08:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [s390x] (eoan-proposed) [5.3.0-23.25]
[08:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-36.39~18.04.1]
[08:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-70.79]
[08:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [ppc64el] (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-36.39] (core, kernel)
[08:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [4.15.0-70.79] (core, kernel)
[08:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (eoan-proposed/main) [5.3.0-23.25] (core, kernel)
[08:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-36.39] (core, kernel)
[08:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.15.0-70.79]
[08:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [ppc64el] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-36.39]
[08:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-36.39]
[08:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (eoan-proposed) [5.3.0-23.25]
[08:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe-edge [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.3.0-23.25~18.04.1] (kernel)
[08:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [arm64] (disco-proposed/main) [5.0.0-36.39] (core, kernel)
[08:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-70.79~16.04.1] (kernel)
[08:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.4.0-169.198] (core, kernel)
[08:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [5.0.0-36.39~18.04.1] (kernel)
[08:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed/main) [4.15.0-70.79~16.04.1] (kernel)
[08:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: linux-signed [arm64] (eoan-proposed/main) [5.3.0-23.25] (core, kernel)
[08:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe-edge [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [5.3.0-23.25~18.04.1]
[08:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [arm64] (disco-proposed) [5.0.0-36.39]
[08:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-70.79~16.04.1]
[08:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (xenial-proposed) [4.4.0-169.198]
[08:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [5.0.0-36.39~18.04.1]
[08:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed-hwe [ppc64el] (xenial-proposed) [4.15.0-70.79~16.04.1]
[08:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [arm64] (eoan-proposed) [5.3.0-23.25]
[11:54] <tjaalton> doko: will focal ship with jdk8?
[11:55] <doko> yes, but no committed support past the lieve time of bionic
[11:55] <tjaalton> ok
[11:56] <tjaalton> I heard that fedora 32 is finally starting to move towards jdk1x
[11:56] <tjaalton> as the default
[12:42] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, any idea about r-cran-sf / armhf autopkgtest failure=?
[12:42] <LocutusOfBorg> looks like the old version needs a rebuild against new proj to start test ok
[12:43] <LocutusOfBorg> while the new version has a "bus error" on armhf-only that looks suspicious an armhf/arm64 misaligment
[12:43] <LocutusOfBorg> but I don't know about such issues and how to fix
[12:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: zfs-linux (eoan-proposed/main) [0.8.1-1ubuntu14.1 => 0.8.1-1ubuntu14.2] (core)
[13:15] <RikMills> An opinion from an AA please? Debian have renamed the libindi source package back to just 'indi'. The difficultly with us syncing that is there is already a previous indi source in the archive, with a 5: epoch :/
[13:16] <RikMills> So I wondered if you would prefer that we carry on with the libindi source and just sync that with the contents for debian do for indi?
[13:17] <RikMills> Or whether reverting to our indi source and carrying an epoch debian does not have?
[13:17] <RikMills> Neither seems a great option...
[13:36] <RikMills> apw: the new renamed indi source from debian and old ancient indi in Ubuntu don't share binary package names, so would it work to delete the old indi then sync from debian?
[13:36] <RikMills> source version would go backwards, but no binary versions would
[13:38] <RikMills> e.g.
[13:38] <RikMills> remove: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/indi
[13:38] <RikMills> sync: https://packages.debian.org/source/sid/indi
[13:39] <RikMills> then remove: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libindi/
[13:49] <apw> RikMills, my heart says we might be ok to remove and sync without an epoch _if_ there is no binary overlap, but that really is pushing the boundaries of my practicle experience; so i think we would need to ask someone with a heck of a lot more experience, infinity ?
[13:50] <RikMills> apw: ok. thanks!
[14:45] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: I haven't gotten very far with debugging r-cran-sf/armhf because gdb is hanging for me in focal instead of giving me tracebacks. >:|
[14:47] <LocutusOfBorg> :/
[14:48] <LocutusOfBorg> btw, I can't quite understand why camitk fails on amd64, libinsighttoolkit4-dev is installable on my focal...
[15:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (bionic-proposed/partner) [1:20191009.1-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS> => 1:20191113.1-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>] (no packageset)
[15:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (eoan-proposed/partner) [1:20191009.1-0ubuntu3 => 1:20191113.1-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>] (no packageset)
[15:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (disco-proposed/partner) [1:20191009.1-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS> => 1:20191113.1-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>] (no packageset)
[15:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: adobe-flashplugin (xenial-proposed/partner) [1:20191009.1-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS> => 1:20191113.1-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>] (no packageset)
[15:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted livecd-rootfs [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.525.35]
[17:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-sybil [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [1.2.0-1] (no packageset)
[18:18] <chrisccoulson> hi, would somebody please be able to approve the adobe-flashplugin partner uploads for xenial -> eoan?
[19:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-sybil [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.2.0-1]
[20:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [arm64] (focal-proposed) [1.3.3-3]
[20:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.3.3-3]
[20:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [i386] (focal-proposed) [1.3.3-3]
[20:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fwupd [armhf] (focal-proposed) [1.3.3-3]
[22:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected apport [source] (eoan-proposed) [2.20.11-0ubuntu8.3]
[22:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected apport [source] (disco-proposed) [2.20.10-0ubuntu27.4]
[22:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected apport [source] (bionic-proposed) [2.20.9-0ubuntu7.10]
[22:31] <ddstreet> anyone able to approve systemd in bionic?  been in there for quite a long time now (originally uploaded it Oct 18, then added more fixes Nov 1)
[23:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: broccoli-python [s390x] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.63-1] (no packageset)
[23:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: broccoli-python [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.63-1] (no packageset)
[23:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: broccoli-python [i386] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.63-1] (no packageset)
[23:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: broccoli-python [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.63-1] (no packageset)
[23:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: broccoli-python [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.63-1] (no packageset)
[23:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: broccoli-python [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.63-1] (no packageset)
[23:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: crun [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/none) [0.10.5+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[23:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: crun [armhf] (focal-proposed/none) [0.10.5+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[23:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: erlang-unicode-util-compat [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/none) [0.5.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: crun [s390x] (focal-proposed/none) [0.10.5+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[23:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-barrel [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/none) [0.6.2-1] (no packageset)
[23:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: phylonium [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/none) [1.1-1] (no packageset)
[23:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-box-drawing [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/none) [0.1.2-1] (no packageset)
[23:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: crun [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [0.10.5+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[23:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: erlang-unicode-util-compat [arm64] (focal-proposed/none) [0.5.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fst [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [0.115.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-crossterm-winapi [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/none) [0.3.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: erlang-unicode-util-compat [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [0.5.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-tempora [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [1.14.1-1] (no packageset)
[23:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: erlang-unicode-util-compat [armhf] (focal-proposed/none) [0.5.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-radix-trie [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/none) [0.1.5-1] (no packageset)
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: crun [arm64] (focal-proposed/none) [0.10.5+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ddogleg [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [0.17+ds-2] (no packageset)
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: erlang-unicode-util-compat [s390x] (focal-proposed/none) [0.5.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qcelemental [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [0.5.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ruby-rqrcode-core [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [0.1.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-barrel [arm64] (focal-proposed/none) [0.6.2-1] (no packageset)
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-barrel [s390x] (focal-proposed/none) [0.6.2-1] (no packageset)
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-box-drawing [armhf] (focal-proposed/none) [0.1.2-1] (no packageset)
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-crossterm-winapi [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [0.3.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-migrations-macros [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/none) [1.4.1-1] (no packageset)
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: crun [i386] (focal-proposed/none) [0.10.5+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnome-shell-extension-arc-menu [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [38.3-dev-1] (no packageset)
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-barrel [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [0.6.2-1] (no packageset)
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-box-drawing [arm64] (focal-proposed/none) [0.1.2-1] (no packageset)
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-crossterm-winapi [arm64] (focal-proposed/none) [0.3.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-radix-trie [arm64] (focal-proposed/none) [0.1.5-1] (no packageset)
[23:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-section-testing [arm64] (focal-proposed/none) [0.0.4-1] (no packageset)
[23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wpebackend-fdo [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/none) [1.4.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: erlang-unicode-util-compat [i386] (focal-proposed/none) [0.5.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-barrel [armhf] (focal-proposed/none) [0.6.2-1] (no packageset)
[23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-prettytable-rs [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/none) [0.8.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-section-testing [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/none) [0.0.4-1] (no packageset)
[23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-bioc-biocversion [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [3.10.1-1] (no packageset)
[23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-radix-trie [armhf] (focal-proposed/none) [0.1.5-1] (no packageset)
[23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-box-drawing [i386] (focal-proposed/none) [0.1.2-1] (no packageset)
[23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gnumed-client [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [1.7.8+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: phylonium [arm64] (focal-proposed/none) [1.1-1] (no packageset)
[23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: phylonium [s390x] (focal-proposed/none) [1.1-1] (no packageset)
[23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-box-drawing [s390x] (focal-proposed/none) [0.1.2-1] (no packageset)
[23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-crossterm-winapi [s390x] (focal-proposed/none) [0.3.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-prettytable-rs [armhf] (focal-proposed/none) [0.8.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-section-testing [armhf] (focal-proposed/none) [0.0.4-1] (no packageset)
[23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: phylonium [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [1.1-1] (no packageset)
[23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-box-drawing [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [0.1.2-1] (no packageset)
[23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-prettytable-rs [arm64] (focal-proposed/none) [0.8.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: phylonium [armhf] (focal-proposed/none) [1.1-1] (no packageset)
[23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-radix-trie [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [0.1.5-1] (no packageset)
[23:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-crossterm-winapi [i386] (focal-proposed/none) [0.3.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: inkscape-survex-export [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [1.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-dmsh [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [0.1.3-1] (no packageset)
[23:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-crossterm-winapi [armhf] (focal-proposed/none) [0.3.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-migrations-macros [arm64] (focal-proposed/none) [1.4.1-1] (no packageset)
[23:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-migrations-macros [i386] (focal-proposed/none) [1.4.1-1] (no packageset)
[23:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-prettytable-rs [i386] (focal-proposed/none) [0.8.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-radix-trie [i386] (focal-proposed/none) [0.1.5-1] (no packageset)
[23:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wpebackend-fdo [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [1.4.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wpebackend-fdo [armhf] (focal-proposed/none) [1.4.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lightbox2.js [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [2.11.1+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[23:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-migrations-macros [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [1.4.1-1] (no packageset)
[23:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-migrations-macros [s390x] (focal-proposed/none) [1.4.1-1] (no packageset)
[23:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-section-testing [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [0.0.4-1] (no packageset)
[23:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-barrel [i386] (focal-proposed/none) [0.6.2-1] (no packageset)
[23:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-prettytable-rs [s390x] (focal-proposed/none) [0.8.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-migrations-macros [armhf] (focal-proposed/none) [1.4.1-1] (no packageset)
[23:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wpebackend-fdo [arm64] (focal-proposed/none) [1.4.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: phylonium [i386] (focal-proposed/none) [1.1-1] (no packageset)
[23:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-prettytable-rs [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [0.8.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-section-testing [i386] (focal-proposed/none) [0.0.4-1] (no packageset)
[23:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: r-bioc-all [amd64] (focal-proposed/none) [1.28.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wpebackend-fdo [i386] (focal-proposed/none) [1.4.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-radix-trie [s390x] (focal-proposed/none) [0.1.5-1] (no packageset)
[23:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-section-testing [s390x] (focal-proposed/none) [0.0.4-1] (no packageset)
[23:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wpebackend-fdo [s390x] (focal-proposed/none) [1.4.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted phylonium [i386] (focal-proposed) [1.1-1]
[23:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-migrations-macros [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.4.1-1]
[23:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-prettytable-rs [amd64] (focal-proposed) [0.8.0-1]
[23:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-section-testing [i386] (focal-proposed) [0.0.4-1]
[23:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wpebackend-fdo [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.4.0-1]
[23:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wpebackend-fdo [i386] (focal-proposed) [1.4.0-1]
[23:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: broccoli-python [amd64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.63-1] (no packageset)
[23:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: broccoli-python [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.63-1] (no packageset)
[23:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: broccoli-python [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.63-1] (no packageset)
[23:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: crun [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.10.5+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[23:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted r-bioc-all [amd64] (focal-proposed) [1.28.0-1]
[23:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-radix-trie [s390x] (focal-proposed) [0.1.5-1]
[23:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wpebackend-fdo [armhf] (focal-proposed) [1.4.0-1]
[23:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: broccoli-python [arm64] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.63-1] (no packageset)
[23:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: crun [armhf] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.10.5+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[23:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-migrations-macros [armhf] (focal-proposed) [1.4.1-1]
[23:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wpebackend-fdo [s390x] (focal-proposed) [1.4.0-1]
[23:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: erlang-unicode-util-compat [ppc64el] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.5.0-1] (no packageset)
[23:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted rust-section-testing [s390x] (focal-proposed) [0.0.4-1]
[23:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: broccoli-python [i386] (focal-proposed/universe) [0.63-1] (no packageset)


[09:51] <motorto> Hi guys , I am trying to set a static ip addr for my ubuntu server, but after modifying my netplan to this : http://ix.io/2Ahm , and run netplan apply , I get no internet connection
[09:51] <motorto> Could you help me ?
[09:51] <motorto> Maybe what I am missing / doing wrong
[09:54] <mgedmin> motorto: that looks like a YAML syntax error to me; you need a space after the colon in "dhcp4:false"
[09:55] <mgedmin> you can check for syntax problems with apt install yamllint
[09:55] <motorto> Ups , my original file doesn't have that syntax error
[09:56] <motorto> I had to transpose the file to my host machine by hand
[09:56] <motorto> Running on a vm
[09:56] <motorto> Ubuntu-Server
[09:56] <mgedmin> also indentation seems wrong (dhcp4 under nameservers?)
[09:56] <motorto> That's the default
[09:57] <motorto> It came like that on default installation
[09:57] <mgedmin> ah! never mind then
[09:58] <mgedmin> )although the manual page says that's not valid)
[09:59] <motorto> I added rendered line , and of course the settings to enp0s3 (disabled dhcp)
[09:59] <mgedmin> version: 2 is also in the wrong place?
[09:59] <motorto> Once again the defaults , didn't modify the structure of the file
[10:00] <motorto> And netplan try doesn't gives me any errors
[10:01] <mgedmin> I'm going to assume the file is fine, just you messed up the indentation when copying it by hand into the pastebin
[10:02] <motorto> Correct , netplan doesn't gives me any errors !
[10:03] <motorto> http://ix.io/2Ahq
[10:03] <motorto> Sorry just noticed now how bad indented the file I sent was
[10:03] <mgedmin> ah, that's mor elike it
[10:03] <motorto> Now its indented as it is on my vm
[10:04] <mgedmin> what's the output of 'ip a'?
[10:04] <mgedmin> since it's hard to pastebin without working network maybe you can take a screenshot and upload it to imgur.com?
[10:05] <motorto> Thanks , you just made my life easier
[10:05] <motorto> https://imgur.com/a/EFQevyO
[10:10] <motorto> Sorry , changed networks , and had to log out and log in again mgedmin
[10:13] <mgedmin> well, so the IP you specified _is_ configured
[10:13] <mgedmin> hey I only just now noticed
[10:13] <mgedmin> you set the gateway address to be the same as the host address
[10:13] <mgedmin> so it can't reach anything else on the internet as a result
[10:14] <motorto> Can my gateway be anything ?
[10:14] <motorto> Except the same as ip ?
[10:15] <mgedmin> no, it needs to be the correct gateway IP for the network you're in
[10:15] <mgedmin> e.g. if you rent a VPS from a provider, the provider will tell you what IP, netmask, gateway to use (or they may tell you to use DHCP)
[10:15] <mgedmin> you can't just pick random numbers and expect to be able to connect to the internet
[10:16] <motorto> How do I check the current gateway ?
[10:16] <motorto> ip route ?
[10:16] <motorto> I am going to enable dhcp then
[10:16] <motorto> reboot and the set the static ip , to the gateway that dhcp connected
[10:17] <mgedmin> yeah `ip r` will show you the gateway in the `default via X.X.X.X ...` line
[10:20] <motorto> https://imgur.com/a/HvPhJvG
[10:20] <motorto> In this case my gateway is <IP_ADDRESS>
[10:21] <motorto> Can I keep the yaml as is  and simply modify the gateway line to <IP_ADDRESS> ?
[10:22] <motorto> Because I am pretty sure the answer is no ( tried it and no internet connection
[10:23] <mgedmin> you can't just pick random IP addresses, you might conflict with some other VPS already using that IP
[10:24] <mgedmin> besides <IP_ADDRESS> is in a different network from <IP_ADDRESS>/24
[10:24] <mgedmin> a gateway needs to be in the same subnet
[10:34] <motorto> Hum thanks ,for the help !
[10:35] <motorto> I am still not succefull , basically what I want is my vm to have always the same ip so that I can ssh into that , independent if my laptop is on wifi or ethernet
[10:35] <motorto> But that's offtopic here
[10:38] <mgedmin> wait, is it a VM running on your local machine?  I assumed a cloud VPS for some reason
[10:39] <mgedmin> if you install avahi-daemon in the VM, perhaps you can always ssh using its hostname.local?
[10:39] <motorto> Yeah , its a local vm on my host machine
[10:39] <motorto> *on my local machine
[10:40] <motorto> Ok let me try that
[10:40] <mgedmin> what virtualization tech do you have?  the hypervisor ought to be able to configure a static IP
[10:41] <mgedmin> I have a bunch of libvirt-managed VMs with static IPs in my office
[10:41] <motorto> I am using oracle virtualbox
[10:41] <motorto> Just because it's easier to setup than a libvirt
[10:41] <mgedmin> (actually they're static only in the sense that my router assigns them the same IP via DHCP based on the MAC address)
[10:42] <motorto> But there on your local machine you are connected to the same network all the time right ?
[10:43] <motorto> Ubuntu enables automatically the systemd services ?
[10:44] <mgedmin> IIRC in virtualbox you have a choice of using bridged vs NATed vs host-only network
[10:44] <motorto> I know , bridged changes ip addr all the time
[10:45] <motorto> NAT , it's what I am currently using with port-forwarding
[10:45] <motorto> But that doesn't seem to be working
[10:45] <mgedmin> what is your goal?  ssh into your VM from the host?  ssh into your VM from other machines on the LAN?
[10:47] <motorto> ssh from my host to the vm
[10:49] <mgedmin> that's certainly simpler
[10:49] <mgedmin> doesn't virtualbox allow you to specify a static (internal) IP for the VM?
[10:50] <mgedmin> then inside the VM you can use DHCP and you'll always get the right fixed IP
[10:50] <mgedmin> and outside you can add it to /etc/hosts, or set up an alias via ~/.ssh/config, whichever you like
[10:59] <motorto> Can I delete  the yaml , and on bot it will be recreated ?
[11:09] <motorto> On ubuntu server 20.04 can I still use the /etc/network/interfaces instead of netplan ?
[11:23] <motorto> So I created a adapter on virtualbox, and it has the following settings:
[11:23] <motorto> ipv4 address: <IP_ADDRESS>
[11:23] <motorto> ipv4 network mask: <IP_ADDRESS>
[11:24] <motorto> ipv6 addr fe80::7727:807e:68e8:755e
[11:24] <motorto> ipv6 prefix length: 64
[11:24] <motorto> Now setting the adapter on netplan , doesn't seem possible ... Can't find a network mask adapter
[11:25] <motorto> Option on netplan
[11:30] <RoyK> fe80:: is just link local
[12:24] <samba35> how to optimize  /auto tune swap usage on ram / swap on hdd ?
[12:30] <ice9> after upgrading to 20.04, I get this error during 'apt update': https://bpa.st/OLZA   any idea?
[12:31] <lotuspsychje> !crosspost | ice9
[12:35] <RoyK> iwell,  that's a ppa, not supported
[12:36] <oerheks> wireguard ppa is no longer needed.
[12:36] <samba35> ok
[15:27] <mgedmin> hmm, I cannot apt install atop inside an LXD container?
[15:36] <tomreyn> is that because when you try to, you computer mutates into a coffee machine?
[15:38] <tomreyn> i assume it is not, but you didn't really tell us what happens whenyou try.
[15:39] <mgedmin> sorry, the postinst script fails because the atopacct.service unit fails because
[15:39] <mgedmin> atopacctd[1839]: receive NETLINK family, errno -2
[15:42] <mgedmin> found a workaround: systemctl mask atopacct.service before the apt install
[15:42] <Aison> hello, one of my ubuntu servers (btrfs as root) refuses to boot. The boot process ends with initramfs and the busybox console. The last message I can read is run-init PID must be 1
[15:44] <Aison> I tried to mount the real /dev/sdb2 (the real root) on /root and then do run-init /root /sbin/init
[15:45] <Aison> but this is not accepted with the same error PID must be 1
[15:46] <Aison> or how can I manually continue from busybox?
[15:46] <Soni> these tests take 2 hours to run on qemu-system-s390x
[15:46] <Soni> they take 2 minutes to run on CI
[15:46] <Soni> but that's x86_64 CI, not s390x
[15:47] <Soni> we haven't tried running them on x86_64 locally...
[15:49] <Soni> let's see how fast they run locally...
[15:53] <Soni> oh yeah
[15:53] <Soni> it runs in minutes locally
[15:53] <Soni> ;-;
[15:54] <Soni> done in 86 seconds
[15:58] <Soni> anyone got an s390x box we could use? .-.
[16:02] <Soni> can we get that box *and* finish running tests on it *before* this run finishes? it's at 1300 seconds, so we have a little over an hour to do all that
[16:02] <Soni> (yeah, this is ridiculous. :/)
[16:25] <tomreyn> Soni: i'm not sure what the context is of what you're saying, but other than the s390x resources i believe canonical and ubuntu have available via launchpadbuild nodes, a couple other open source friendly projects also got some, and share them.
[16:26] <Soni> and how do you use those with a fork? https://github.com/WebAssembly/wabt/pull/1557
[16:27] <tomreyn> travis ci should work, i guess
[16:27] <Soni> just, anything that would get rid of 2 hour test times .-.
[16:28] <tomreyn> is this on github build infrastructure?
[16:28] <Soni> apparently?
[16:30] <Soni> ideally a shell would make this easier but eh w/e
[16:31] <tomreyn> i see. well, you could try on travix ci, launchpad, osuosl, i think obs, too
[16:45] <Soni> linuxone community cloud?
[19:22] <ubone> installed mailman3
[19:22] <ubone> https://ubuntu.com/server/docs/mail-mailman and postfix's master.cf says there should be /usr/lib/mailman/bin/postfix-to-mailman.py but there is not
[19:23] <ubone> nor in mailman3
[19:42] <ubone> a bug from 2004 ...
[21:47] <tomreyn> ubone: there is in package "mailman", on 18.04 (and maybe other releases). you did not state which ubuntu release you'Re using.
[21:49] <tomreyn> most likely, though, you're looking for a wyay to do it with python 3, and /usr/lib/mailman/bin/postfix-to-mailman.py will be python 2.
[21:51] <tomreyn><EMAIL_ADDRESS>[21:54] <tomreyn> https://docs.mailman3.org/projects/mailman/en/latest/src/mailman/docs/mta.html
[22:00] <ubone> yep i used mailman3 not the legacy one
[22:01] <ubone> it's 1804
[22:02] <tomreyn> no, no, it's 2020


[09:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: smifb2 (noble-proposed/universe) [<IP_ADDRESS>.gbbd2e82-1 => <IP_ADDRESS>.gbbd2e82-1ubuntu0.1] (no packageset)
[14:24] <jbicha> ubuntu-sru: could glib2.0/noble be reviewed? it is on the list of release day SRUs at https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/noble-numbat-24-04-release-status-tracking/44043
[14:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (noble-proposed/main) [1:24.04.16 => 1:24.04.17] (core)
[14:29] <juliank> ubuntu-sru Please reject the first two ubuntu-release-upgrader (the one from enr0n and the first of mine I accidentally ran the pre-build to early, anyway), so third time is the charm
[14:29] <juliank> Good date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 16:26:40 +0200
[14:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntu-release-upgrader (noble-proposed/main) [1:24.04.16 => 1:24.04.17] (core)
[14:35] <juliank> mfo: ^ the ubuntu-release-upgrader noble SRU is sort of urgent to fix the systemd-resolved upgrade failure (we sadly can't verify it, but the fix is adding it to the list of packages to install, so that's the best we can do), and wrong markings of t64 packages as manually installed. It would be great to get that accepted today (the third upload, reject the earlier two :))
[14:36] <mfo> juliank, ack, thanks for the ping!
[17:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (noble-proposed/main) [24.1.3-0ubuntu3 => 24.1.3-0ubuntu3.1] (core, ubuntu-cloud)
[18:15] <mfo> juliank, hey o/ re: ubuntu-release-upgrader noble SRU
[18:16] <juliank> mfo: o/
[18:16] <mfo> Right now "just ~ubuntu-sru" can't reject/accept to noble (task [1] not yet done), this would need ~ubuntu-archive or ~ubuntu-release, IIUIC.
[18:16] <mfo> [1] https://warthogs.atlassian.net/browse/RTMP-1657
[18:16] <mfo> Also, I had a question in bug 2061891 (the other 2 look good to me), if you or enr0n  have a chance.
[18:16] <mfo> Thanks!
[18:16] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2061891 in ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu Noble) "Noble upgrade breaks iptables-persistent and netfilter-persistent usage" [Undecided, Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2061891
[18:17] <mfo> Sorry, I can't do much more than that at the moment.
[18:19] <juliank> mfo: comment added
[18:21] <liushuyu> Hi Ubuntu release, I have a SRU request for rustc https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/rustc/+bug/2052985
[18:21] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2052985 in rustc (Ubuntu) "[SRU] Upgrade Rust to 1.76.0" [Medium, Incomplete]
[18:22] <mfo> juliank, that looks good, thanks for clarifying
[18:24] <juliank> Now we just need an ubuntu-archive or ubuntu-release to workaround the queue not being handed over to ubuntu-sru yet
[18:24] <juliank> :D
[18:24] <mfo> liushuyu, o/ ack, i'll add it to the list to review.
[18:25] <jbicha> juliank: oh so we need to ping ubuntu-release about -upgrader & glib2.0?
[18:26] <vorlon> juliank, mfo: I can puppet SRU accepts right now if they're signed off by another member of ubuntu-sru
[18:26] <juliank> Hooray
[18:27] <vorlon> mfo: ^ please confirm you're happy for me to accept ubuntu-release-upgrader
[18:27] <liushuyu> mfo: Thanks!
[18:28] <juliank> jbicha: you want SRU vanguard/mfo today to sign off on the SRU and then ping vorlon I suppose
[18:28] <mfo> vorlon, I'll finish the review and get back to you; thanks!
[18:28] <mfo> juliank, jbicha: yup, i'll do it that way for today's shift.
[18:48] <mfo> vorlon, please feel free to accept ubuntu-release-upgrader for noble (the most recent one, with `Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 16:26:40 +0200`), and reject its older 2 uploads.  thanks!
[19:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (focal-proposed/main) [24.1.3-0ubuntu1~20.04.1 => 24.1.3-0ubuntu1~20.04.2] (core, edubuntu, ubuntu-cloud)
[19:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (jammy-proposed/main) [24.1.3-0ubuntu1~22.04.1 => 24.1.3-0ubuntu1~22.04.2] (core, ubuntu-cloud)
[19:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: cloud-init (mantic-proposed/main) [24.1.3-0ubuntu1~23.10.2 => 24.1.3-0ubuntu1~23.10.3] (core, ubuntu-cloud)
[19:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntu-release-upgrader [source] (noble-proposed) [1:24.04.17]
[19:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntu-release-upgrader [source] (noble-proposed) [1:24.04.17]
[19:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: 7857 entries have been added or removed
[19:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted ubuntu-release-upgrader [source] (noble-proposed) [1:24.04.17]
[19:24] <blackboxsw> ubuntu-sru: SRU regression-update for cloud-init 24.1.3 released on Thursday for last week for images which don't have snapd deb package installed and user-data which requests `package_upgrade:true`. Uploads have been pushed for noble, focal, jammy and mantic to support Ubuntu images without snapd deb package per bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/2064132
[19:24] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2064132 in cloud-init (Ubuntu) "images without snapd installed error on `update_packages: true` user-data" [Critical, Fix Committed]
[19:25] <blackboxsw> While admitedly, this is a corner-case, this is a straight-forward fix.
[19:26] <blackboxsw> for release-team, this does imply the there is an upload for cloud-init wafting in the the unapproved queue with this same fix ^
[19:30] <vorlon> blackboxsw: how is this an SRU regression? what images do we ship without snapd?
[19:30] <blackboxsw> vorlon: good question. We don't ship images in canonical without snapd, even ubuntu-minimal  has snapd right? It's a general ubuntu issue for anyone with derivative images.
[19:31] <vorlon> define "ubuntu-minimal"
[19:31] <vorlon> there are minimal cloud and server images; afaik these both include snapd
[19:31] <vorlon> philroche: ^^ maybe you can confirm faster than I can check
[19:31] <blackboxsw> I was thinking minimal cloud images.
[19:32] <vorlon> blackboxsw: what was the context in which this regression was identified?
[19:32] <vorlon> blackboxsw: ftr snapd is explicitly in the server-cloud-minimal seed for noble+ and in server-minimal for jammy
[19:32] <blackboxsw> vorlon: and maybe by this sentiment,  if  all Canonical server/cloud images contain snapd, then this isn't considered an SRU regression because our primary ubuntu images streams don't have this ssue.
[19:34] <blackboxsw> I just considered it an SRU regression because there are derivative images out there (incus for instanece) which don't package snapd in their images and this does affect them. But, they are off path in their image creation, so maybe that doesn't qualify for SRU regressions?
[19:34] <blackboxsw> "off path" == divergent from Canonical Ubuntu images
[19:36] <blackboxsw> I'm ok if that's our consideration with qualifying SRU regressions: "the behavior regression must be represented within Canonical cloud/server/desktop images to be considered an SRU-regression".  It just felt a little murky to me.
[19:36] <falcojr> as far as context, in our last cloud-init release, we added support for snap alongside apt in the module that will update or install packages. Part of that code does a "snap refresh" and we had a bug report that "snap refresh" was getting called even though they didn't have snap on their system, and this is causing cloud-init to exit with error
[19:37] <falcojr> so we added new behavior in an SRU that broke somebody's use case (though looks like maybe invalid use case?)
[19:38] <blackboxsw> I get that we can't support all derivative images and use-cases, because that's unsustainable for all of our projects. So we'll defer to best judgement here.
[19:41] <vorlon> blackboxsw, falcojr: I certainly don't object to you doing a follow-on SRU to re-enable this use case, but I don't think it qualifies as an SRU regression if someone has mangled their image to remove snapd
[19:41] <blackboxsw> Ok so maybe our treatment of this as regression-updates is "severe" for this case
[19:43] <blackboxsw> ok let's demote the priority  this from regression-updates and we'll just queue for SRU review
[19:43] <blackboxsw> thanks vorlon
[19:44] <blackboxsw> "regression-update" tag dropped
[20:29] <Eickmeyer> Rats, I was hoping my SRUs would be accepted before the oracular copy. 😞
[20:30] <cjwatson> I see on https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+series that mantic is still in the "Current Stable Release" state - missed checklist step somewhere?
[20:51] <Eickmeyer> ubuntu-sru, or ubuntu-release, or ubuntu-archive (why not ping everyone?): please reject the last upload of ubuntustudio-installer, I've got something to fix two bugs and now that oracular is at least in-place, a correct SRU-worthy versioning.
[20:59] <mfo> jbicha, re: glib2.0 (bug 2063221) it looks mostly OK for SRU -- I just added a comment for a missing section in the SRU template. Thanks!
[20:59] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2063221 in glib2.0 (Ubuntu) "Drop libglib2.0-0 transitional package" [High, In Progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2063221
[21:04] <jbicha> juliank: um, because the 2063221 upload wasn't accepted before noble's release and the archive freeze, how do you recommend we proceed?
[21:06] <mfo> jbicha, if I may -- if you're referring to getting it into the devel release, I think that is covered by the task in release opening for copying anything in -updates into devel
[21:06] <mfo> https://warthogs.atlassian.net/browse/RTMP-1655
[21:06] <juliank> jbicha: vorlon removed the binary for the previous version with archive admin magic, we do need the new one in proposed to make sure we don't accidentally reintroduce it though but we can set block-proposed-noble
[21:06] <jbicha> oh ok, magic is nice
[21:08] <juliank> So it's not possible to trigger the bug anymore as mfo found out because the transitional package that is being removed is already force removed by magic
[21:08] <juliank> Makes for a funny SRU test plan I suppose
[21:08] <mfo> ah, so that's why. cool :)
[21:08] <mfo> heh, definitely.
[21:16] <jbicha> mfo: I've updated the test case etc.
[21:17] <mfo> liushuyu, hey o/ re: rust 1.76/noble, I switched the bug back from 'Incomplete' as you addressed Steve's question (please do it in the future to avoid bugs expiring :), but considering the latter answer, it's certainly best for him to follow up on it.
[21:21] <mfo> jbicha, thanks!
[21:23] <mfo> vorlon, please accept glib2.0 for noble, if you have a chance; thanks! (BTW, this is the last request for the day; I'll EOD soon. Appreciate the help today.)
[21:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntustudio-installer (noble-proposed/universe) [1.18 => 1.18.1] (ubuntustudio)
[22:34] <liushuyu> mfo: Understood. Will ping Steve when they are available
[23:08] <vorlon> cjwatson: launchpad allows two series to be marked "current stable release" at the same time? TIL; I thought this was automatic
[23:08] <vorlon> cjwatson: ah no, I see it listed in https://warthogs.atlassian.net/browse/RTMP-1598. chasing up
[23:10] <vorlon> mfo, jbicha: accepted, thanks
[23:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted glib2.0 [source] (noble-proposed) [2.80.0-6ubuntu3]
[23:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntustudio-installer [source] (noble-proposed) [1.18.1]
[23:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntustudio-installer [source] (noble-proposed) [1.19]
[23:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected ubuntustudio-installer [source] (noble-proposed) [1.19]
[23:12] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: hmm you said "last upload", I didn't realize there were others in the queue so I've wound up rejecting all 3; I'm not clear why the *latest* one had an SRU-ish version number (1.18.1) but the other older two did not?  anyway, sorry if I rejected something you didn't mean for me to, it's easiest if you re-upload anything you want processed as an SRU
[23:13] <Eickmeyer> vorlon: No, 1.18.1 is what I want. 1.19 would be for oracular.
[23:13] <vorlon> and I'm now also at the "move non-SRUs from noble-proposed unapproved to oracular-proposed" step, so there's some unpicking to do here
[23:14] <Eickmeyer> I see.
[23:14] <Eickmeyer> I mean, 1.18.1 works for both. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
[23:14] <Eickmeyer> Was mostly precautionary in this "gray" area between now and oracular officially opening.
[23:14] <vorlon> Eickmeyer: right, so as I said, best if you reupload
[23:15] <Eickmeyer> Yep, will reupload 1.19 for oracular.
[23:15] <Eickmeyer> Oh, you meant *all* of them.
[23:16] <Eickmeyer> No worries.
[23:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ubuntustudio-installer (noble-proposed/universe) [1.18 => 1.18.1] (ubuntustudio)
[23:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted apt [source] (noble-proposed) [2.8.0]
[23:19] <vorlon> cjwatson: mantic fixed
[23:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected lxd-installer [source] (noble-proposed) [5]
[23:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lxd-installer (oracular-proposed/main) [4 => 5] (core)
[23:24] <wxl> oh oracular is officially open now? i hadn't seen the email
[23:29] <Eickmeyer> wxl: I'm not sure it is...?
[23:39] <wxl> Eickmeyer: well i said that because i saw lxd-installer just pop into it ^
[23:40] <Eickmeyer> wxl: Notice it's also being held in "Unapproved".
[23:40] <wxl> true true but still i don't know that i'd expect that mcuh :)