[19:42] <ibeardslee> morning
[22:45] <chilts> morning
[22:50] <olly> morning
[23:28] <mwhudson> morning


[00:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: libcupsfilters (lunar-proposed/primary) [2.0~b2-0ubuntu4]
 "I believe workaround here is..." <- Hi, libreoffice doesn't depend on ca-certificates-java by itself. It gets pulled in by another package and dpkg decides the installation order. So openjdk is the problem as mentioned above.
[06:50] <ricotz> regarding the urgency, I guess this depends on the transitions which are blocked by libreoffice currently
[07:50] <ricotz> RAOF, hello :), would you be still avaiable to handle https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/2003735 ?
[07:50] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2003735 in libreoffice (Ubuntu Kinetic) "[SRU] libreoffice 7.4.4 updates for kinetic" [Critical, In Progress]
[08:46] <LocutusOfBorg> seb128, hello, ruby3.1 build on i386 please?
[08:59] <seb128> LocutusOfBorg, hey, building now
[09:01] <seb128> and brb
[09:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed onetbb from i386-whitelist in lunar
[09:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed openjdk-lts from i386-whitelist in lunar
[09:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed pydata-sphinx-theme from i386-whitelist in lunar
[09:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed sphinx-book-theme from i386-whitelist in lunar
[09:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Removed tbb from i386-whitelist in lunar
[09:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Packageset: Added ruby3.1 to i386-whitelist in lunar
[09:31] <LocutusOfBorg> ta!
[09:49] <seb128> np!
[09:52] <LocutusOfBorg> ubuntu-archive, can we please remove anfo due to Debian RC: #1012893 ?
[09:53] <LocutusOfBorg> ubuntu-archive, can we please remove ortools due to Debian RC: #1024790 ?
[09:55] <seb128> LocutusOfBorg, unless those are needed to unblock some transition there is no need to ping about those, Debian removal are processed semiregularly, see 5.3 on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ArchiveAdministration
[09:55] <LocutusOfBorg> protobuf seb128
[09:56] <seb128> LocutusOfBorg, please state the reasons when you do requests
[09:56] <LocutusOfBorg> same for pytorch due to Debian RC: #1027851
[09:56] <LocutusOfBorg> pardon :) https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/html/auto-protobuf.html
[09:56] <LocutusOfBorg> this is the reason
[09:57] <ginggs> seb128: these were not removals from unstable, only from testing
[09:57] <LocutusOfBorg> also nageru on ppc64el needs to be kicked out, removed in debian
[09:57] <ginggs> LocutusOfBorg: please file bug reports
[09:57] <ginggs> and subscribe ubuntu-archive
[09:57] <seb128> we can demote to proposed to unblock a transition
[09:57] <seb128> rather than remove
[09:57] <LocutusOfBorg> seb128, nageru on ppc64el need actual removal
[09:58] <LocutusOfBorg> Debian bug: #1014241
[09:58] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Debian bug 1014241 in ftp.debian.org "RM: nageru [ppc64el] -- ANAIS; nageru no longer built on ppc64el" [Normal, Open] https://bugs.debian.org/1014241
[09:58] <LocutusOfBorg> it should have been done months ago :/
[09:58] <seb128> such statement about what others should have been doing isn't really productive
[09:58] <LocutusOfBorg> well, its not to blame people
[09:59] <LocutusOfBorg> the reason for it not being done, is that for some months luajit was provided by luajit2 on ppc64el, but it has been found to be equally broken
[09:59] <LocutusOfBorg> so, it was a really sad situation, with alternate dpendencies that were back and forth, rc bugs being open/closed, and reopened
[10:00] <LocutusOfBorg> at the end, ppc64el is no-go for libluajit2-5.1-2
[10:00] <LocutusOfBorg> I hope this verbosity helps :)
[11:51] <schopin> vorlon: thanks for hinting the i386 badtests for ruby-net-telnet, I was going to ask you for it :)
[14:57] <ricotz> bdmurray, hello :), could you please accept libreoffice/kinetic - https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/2003735
[14:57] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2003735 in libreoffice (Ubuntu Kinetic) "[SRU] libreoffice 7.4.4 updates for kinetic" [Critical, In Progress]
[15:11] <LocutusOfBorg> somebody please remove  futatabi on ppc64el? (its the above nageru request)
[15:42] <ginggs> it seems that pcre2 10.42-1 may be bad, see debian bug #1027952
[15:42] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Debian bug 1027952 in libpcre2-8-0 "pcre2 causes crashes in link-grammar" [Serious, Open] https://bugs.debian.org/1027952
[15:44] <ginggs> can we revert to 10.40-1ubuntu1 and rebuild link-grammar?
[15:53] <Eickmeyer> sil2100: getting movement on Debian bug 1029377 so we might be able to revert the changes I made in the Ubuntu Studio seed that (hopefully) get it building today, but a new upload of pipewire and its related sync, that should resolve it.
[15:53] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Debian bug 1029377 in pipewire-pulse "pipewire-pulse: Please remove Recommends: pipewire-alsa" [Important, Open] https://bugs.debian.org/1029377
[15:54] <Eickmeyer> Looks like there's some other issues, but they're python migration related.
[15:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: dpdk-kmods (jammy-proposed/universe) [0~20220111+git-1 => 0~20220111+git-1ubuntu1~22.04.1] (no packageset)
[15:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: evdi (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.9.1-1ubuntu5 => 1.12.0+dfsg-0ubuntu2~22.04.1] (kernel-dkms)
[16:08] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: I answered before that nageru should get a sourceful fix because it has a wrong builddep on ppc64el
[16:08] <vorlon> the build-dep should be arch qualified so that futatabi can continue to be built
[16:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rtl8812au (jammy-proposed/universe) [<IP_ADDRESS>75.20140902+dfsg-0ubuntu15 => <IP_ADDRESS>75.20140902+dfsg-0ubuntu17~22.04.1] (kernel-dkms)
[16:23] <LocutusOfBorg> sorry I missed probably this answer
[16:24] <LocutusOfBorg>  Futatabi is a video server and multitrack recorder, made to work in tandem
[16:24] <LocutusOfBorg>  with Nageru. It can record multiple video tracks in sync and play back
[16:24] <LocutusOfBorg> but does it make sense without nageru?
[16:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: openafs (jammy-proposed/universe) [<IP_ADDRESS>-1 => <IP_ADDRESS>-3ubuntu2~22.04.1] (kernel-dkms)
[16:36] <LocutusOfBorg> a:q
[16:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rtl8821ce (jammy-proposed/universe) [<IP_ADDRESS>-0ubuntu10 => <IP_ADDRESS>-0ubuntu11~<IP_ADDRESS>] (kernel-dkms)
[17:00] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, https://launchpadlibrarian.net/647716799/buildlog_ubuntu-lunar-ppc64el.nageru_2.2.0-2ubuntu1_BUILDING.txt.gz
[17:00] <LocutusOfBorg> futatabi only its nogo
[17:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: libppd (lunar-proposed/primary) [2:2.0~b2-0ubuntu4]
[17:09] <LocutusOfBorg> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nageru/2.2.0-2ubuntu2
[17:10] <LocutusOfBorg> this looks more a good fix
[17:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xtrx-dkms (jammy-proposed/universe) [0.0.1+git20190320.5ae3a3e-2 => 0.0.1+git20190320.5ae3a3e-3ubuntu1~22.04.1] (no packageset)
[17:34] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, is this better now? https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nageru/2.2.0-2ubuntu2
[17:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: cups-browsed (lunar-proposed/primary) [2.0~b2-0ubuntu2]
[17:52] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: if you think futatabi shouldn't be built on ppc64el without nageru then you should talk to the Debian maintainer who explicitly configured the package to do that on ppc64el
[17:57] <vorlon> seb128: please don't demote packages to -proposed that are ftbfs when they are syncs from Debian, they just make more work for +1 maintenance for packages that aren't being cared for
[17:57] <vorlon> straight removals are better
[18:07] <vorlon> error: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: '/usr/share/javascript/jquery/jquery.js' -> '/<<PKGBUILDDIR>>/debian/tmp/usr/share/xpra/www/js/lib/jquery.js'
[18:07] <vorlon> ah yes, very sensible for this to be a per-architecture failure
[18:16] <sil2100> Eickmeyer: \o/
[18:16] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, nack, it was removed, but not autosyncd
[18:17] <sil2100> Eickmeyer: thanks for the heads up!
[18:17] <LocutusOfBorg>  nageru (2.2.0-2) unstable; urgency=medium
[18:17] <LocutusOfBorg>  .
[18:17] <LocutusOfBorg>    * Remove ppc64el from futatabi's architecture list.
[18:17] <LocutusOfBorg> I got trapped today by the same issue
[18:17] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: ok, seen
[18:17] <LocutusOfBorg> and I reported the lld link change as bug, so we can sync on next release
[18:18] <LocutusOfBorg> Debian: #1029571
[18:18] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Debian bug 1029571 in src:nageru "nageru: please build with sha1 to let lld link correctly" [Normal, Open] https://bugs.debian.org/1029571
[18:18] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: futatabi/ppc64el removed
[18:18] <LocutusOfBorg> sadly MoM is not caring about proposed pocket, otherwise we would have seen the -2 upload months ago
[18:18] <LocutusOfBorg> thanks!

[18:18] <LocutusOfBorg> meh!
[18:19] <ginggs> let's try a new link-grammar upload before reverting pcre2
[18:19] <vorlon> (i.e. MoM should be replaced by reporting around git-ubuntu)
[18:19] <LocutusOfBorg> its easier to change a default init system in Debian, then a command I'm used to use since more than 10 years every day
[19:01] <seb128> vorlon, ack about demote-to-propose vs removal
[19:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-notifier (kinetic-proposed/main) [<IP_ADDRESS> => <IP_ADDRESS>] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[19:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-notifier (jammy-proposed/main) [<IP_ADDRESS> => <IP_ADDRESS>] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[19:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-notifier (bionic-proposed/main) [<IP_ADDRESS> => <IP_ADDRESS>] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[19:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-notifier (focal-proposed/main) [<IP_ADDRESS> => <IP_ADDRESS>] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[19:59] <vorlon> I'd appreciate eyes on the xpra build failure on arm64 and armhf; it's reproducible, but not for me in a lunar instance
[20:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-notifier (xenial-proposed/main) [3.168.18 => 3.168.19] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[20:13] <vorlon> bryceh, jawn-smith: hi, either of you working on python3-defaults autopkgtest regressions this week for +1?
[20:13] <jawn-smith> vorlon: I haven't been, but I can pivot to that if you'd like
[20:14] <vorlon> https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses_by_team.html#foundations-bugs is looking cleaner wrt test retries stuck in queues; there are still some on s390x that are waiting to be re-run, but most of what's there now represents real failures
[20:14] <vorlon> I've uploaded xpra but it ftbfs on arm* as mentioned above; targetcli-fb is fixed by an upload of python-configshell-fb; q2-fragment-insurtion, q2-sample-classifier are fixed by an upload of sepp that I've just done
[20:14] <bdmurray> ricotz: I don't see any tests being added in the libreoffice SRU so what is the test plan for verifying the fix?
[20:16] <bdmurray> Re the autopkgtest environment I've sorted out an issue with the number of armhf workers and I'm now fiddling with the number of s390x workers to try and find a sweet spot.
[20:19] <ricotz> bdmurray, the test/reproducer is in comment #3 - https://bugs.launchpad.net/df-libreoffice/+bug/2003735/comments/3
[20:19] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2003735 in libreoffice (Ubuntu Kinetic) "[SRU] libreoffice 7.4.4 updates for kinetic" [Critical, In Progress]
[20:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: lubuntu-default-settings (kinetic-proposed/universe) [22.10.4 => 22.10.5] (lubuntu)
[20:20] <arraybolt3> ubuntu-sru: ^ Would like some help with a regression fix when anyone's available. Bug is https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/kinetic/+source/xscreensaver/+bug/1989163.
[20:20] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 1989163 in xscreensaver (Ubuntu Kinetic) "Unable to run screensaver when selected from menu" [High, In Progress]
[20:20] <jawn-smith> vorlon: I'm going to wrap up a package I've been working on today and then pivot to xpra
[20:20] <vorlon> jawn-smith: cool thanks
[20:21] <bdmurray> ricotz: Okay, so the Testing section of the bug description is incorrect then?
[20:23] <ricotz> bdmurray, I am going to add the specific instructions there too now
[20:23] <bdmurray> ricotz: Thanks, that help out other SRU team members
[20:31] <ricotz> bdmurray, everything good now?
[20:54] <bdmurray> ricotz: yes, I've accepted it now
[20:55] <LocutusOfBorg> +  * Add xvfb runtime dependency on armhf (Closes: #921700, #956822)
[20:55] <LocutusOfBorg> +    - This should fix autopkgtests
[20:55] <LocutusOfBorg> +
[20:55] <LocutusOfBorg> + -- Gianfranco Costamagna<EMAIL_ADDRESS>Fri, 05 Feb 2021
[20:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libreoffice [source] (kinetic-proposed) [1:7.4.4-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>]
[20:55] <ricotz> bdmurray, thank you very much
[20:55] <LocutusOfBorg> jawn-smith, ^^ this might help
[20:59] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: you were mentioning lld earlier, is there an obvious fix for the regression in https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/halide/14.0.0-2build1/+build/25424340 ?
[21:00] <LocutusOfBorg> yes
[21:01] <LocutusOfBorg> but syncpackage is not working :)
[21:01] <LocutusOfBorg> 1027939	llvm-toolchain-14	clang-14 lost its (indirect) dependency on libclang-rt-14-dev	halide
[21:01] <jawn-smith> LocutusOfBorg: thanks! I'll keep that in mind
[21:01] <LocutusOfBorg> I did upload it yesterday in debian
[21:01] <LocutusOfBorg> 14.0.0-3
[21:02] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, do you plan to fakesync or something similar?
[21:02] <LocutusOfBorg> I was hoping for autosync to work again
[21:02] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: I wasn't planning on fakesyncing; if it's fixed in unstable and should autosync I'll ignore for now
[21:02] <LocutusOfBorg> ack
[21:10] <cjwatson> auto-sync will hopefully work again soon - I got a notification from the Debian BTS that their ftpmaster had fixed the dak bug we hit
[21:10] <cjwatson> I assume it will take at least one archive cycle to shake out so haven't checked yet
[21:24] <LocutusOfBorg> pj--- O ,ossed ot!
[21:24] <LocutusOfBorg> ooohhh I missed it!
[21:24] <LocutusOfBorg> I checked this morning and no news where on the bug, nice to know!
[22:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-notifier (focal-proposed/main) [<IP_ADDRESS> => <IP_ADDRESS>] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[22:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected update-notifier [source] (focal-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>]
[22:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected update-notifier [source] (bionic-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>]
[22:32] <bryceh> vorlon, hah, breezy ecosystem stuck in -proposed yet again?
[22:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted update-notifier [source] (kinetic-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>]
[22:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted update-notifier [source] (jammy-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>]
[22:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted update-notifier [source] (focal-proposed) [<IP_ADDRESS>]
[22:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-manager (jammy-proposed/main) [1:22.04.10 => 1:22.04.11] (core)
[22:56] <cjwatson> and indeed, importer running again now, so I expect to see auto-sync doing a bunch of stuff in a few minutes
[22:57] <cjwatson> (though the importer had a lot of work to do so it's possible the 23:00 auto-sync may start before it finishes; shouldn't be a big problem, it might just only pick things up from the earlier parts of the alphabet for now and will get the rest at 05:00)
[22:58] <vorlon> bryceh: fwiw paride indicated he was working with breezy upstream to get things sorted
[23:00] <cjwatson> yeah, the importer only got up to about node-<something> before auto-sync started
[23:02]  * tsimonq2 passes Britney some coffee for the long night ahead
[23:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-manager (focal-proposed/main) [1:<IP_ADDRESS> => 1:<IP_ADDRESS>] (core)
[23:02] <vorlon> how long was autosyncing out of commission?
[23:02] <cjwatson> At least the builders have caught up after I broke them last night
[23:04] <cjwatson> vorlon: the previous successful import would've been the one just before the auto-sync run at 11:00 on Saturday
[23:04] <cjwatson> so about 3.5 days
[23:04] <vorlon> ok
[23:04] <vorlon> not terrible
[23:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: update-manager (bionic-proposed/main) [1:<IP_ADDRESS> => 1:<IP_ADDRESS>] (core)
[23:23] <cjwatson> In fact auto-sync got up to openarena-oacmp1 before outracing the importer, since it's not exactly transactional about when it starts
[23:28] <cjwatson> If somebody wants a simple optimization task, the architectures_allowed function in auto-sync could do with caching the result for each target_arch/dsc_arch pair; it's actually noticeably slow
[23:30] <cjwatson> Pulling the subprocess call out to a function and sticking a functools.lru_cache with some reasonable maxsize on it would do the job, I expect
[23:30] <cjwatson> (or even just maxsize=None)
[23:33] <cjwatson> and here come a few hundred copies
[23:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected autopkgtest [source] (kinetic-proposed) [5.25ubuntu1.1]
[23:40] <arraybolt3> RAOF: I hope I'm not being annoying, but if you or bdmurray (or anyone else) is there to review lubuntu-update-notifier and lubuntu-default-settings, I'd be much appreciative. The former is an SRU that was allowed for Jammy and Kinetic that needs to be in Focal (a user in the wild ran into the bug in Focal), while the latter is a regression fix.
[23:40] <arraybolt3> The relevant bug reports are https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/jammy/+source/lubuntu-update-notifier/+bug/2002255 and https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/kinetic/+source/xscreensaver/+bug/1989163.
[23:40] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 2002255 in lubuntu-update-notifier (Ubuntu Focal) "lubuntu-update-notifier provides no good way to resolve a forcibly terminated system update" [High, In Progress]
[23:40] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Launchpad bug 1989163 in xscreensaver (Ubuntu Kinetic) "Unable to run screensaver when selected from menu" [High, In Progress]
[23:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: notus-scanner [amd64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [22.4.2-1] (no packageset)
[23:54] <RAOF> @arraybolt3 Sure, next on my list.
[23:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted fonts-noto-color-emoji [source] (jammy-proposed) [2.038-0ubuntu1]
[23:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: censys [amd64] (lunar-proposed/none) [2.1.9-2] (no packageset)
[23:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gosa-plugins-sudo [amd64] (lunar-proposed/none) [2.8~git20211022.7ff3ed2-2] (no packageset)
[23:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: gosa-plugins-netgroups [amd64] (lunar-proposed/none) [2.8~git20211022.3b6449d-4] (no packageset)
[23:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libfilezilla [amd64] (lunar-proposed/universe) [0.41.0-2] (no packageset)
[23:56] <arraybolt3> Thanks so much!
[23:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libclass-measure-perl [amd64] (lunar-proposed/none) [0.09-2] (no packageset)
[23:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libcudacxx [amd64] (lunar-proposed/none) [1.7.0-2] (no packageset)
[23:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libdbix-admin-createtable-perl [amd64] (lunar-proposed/none) [2.11-2] (no packageset)
[23:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libdevel-cover-report-clover-perl [amd64] (lunar-proposed/none) [1.01-2] (no packageset)
[23:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libhash-safekeys-perl [amd64] (lunar-proposed/none) [0.04-1] (no packageset)
[23:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libtest-mock-cmd-perl [amd64] (lunar-proposed/none) [0.7-2] (no packageset)
[23:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libtest2-tools-explain-perl [amd64] (lunar-proposed/none) [0.02-2] (no packageset)
[23:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libdatetime-hires-perl [amd64] (lunar-proposed/none) [0.04-2] (no packageset)
[23:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libgoto-file-perl [amd64] (lunar-proposed/none) [0.005-2] (no packageset)
[23:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libtest-mocktime-hires-perl [amd64] (lunar-proposed/none) [0.08-2] (no packageset)
[23:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libdbix-class-schema-populatemore-perl [amd64] (lunar-proposed/none) [0.19-2] (no packageset)
[23:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libomemo-c [amd64] (lunar-proposed/none) [0.5.0-2] (no packageset)
[23:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libretro-nestopia [amd64] (lunar-proposed/none) [1.52.0+20221230.gitdd78611-1] (no packageset)
[23:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lingua-franca [amd64] (lunar-proposed/none) [0.4.3-1] (no packageset)
[23:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: liburjtag [amd64] (lunar-proposed/none) [0.0~git20221218.4e7e1f6-2] (no packageset)
[23:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: muon-meson [amd64] (lunar-proposed/none) [0.1.0-2] (no packageset)


[00:12] <nhaines> pleia2: In consideration of Ubuntu Community Appreciation Day, I just wanted to say that I appreciate you and all the work you do pretty much everywhere.
[04:26]  * philipballew is gonna work on a few scale things
[17:51] <pleia2> nhaines: I appreciate that :)
[18:30] <nhaines> pleia2: you deserve it.  :)
[18:31] <nhaines> So I have Super Smash Bros. for Wii U, a Mario amiibo figurine, and a GameCube controller ready to go here.
[18:31]  * nhaines dances.
[18:32] <pleia2> SSB does seem to be The Game people guy the wiiu for
[18:38] <nhaines> I bought it because Pikmin, Zelda, and Mario Kart.  The Mario Kart DLC is brilliant.  But Smash Bros didn't hurt.
[18:40] <nhaines> And Super Mario 3D World is kind of just pure joy, so that was an unexpected bonus.
[18:41] <pleia2> mmmario kart
[18:41] <pleia2> I play on my DS a lot, but my consoles are ignored, I probably won't end up getting one
[18:42] <nhaines> Aww.
[18:42] <nhaines> The F-Zero track in the first DLC pack is incredible fun.  Especially since MK8 is already pretty much F-Zero.
[19:24]  * ianorlin remembers an article aobut someone running a really old version of unix on a game boy advance
[19:57] <rww> pleia2: welcome back!
[19:57] <pleia2> rww: thanks!
[19:58] <rww> pleia2: thoughts on skipping Nov 30th (Thanksgiving weekend) and Dec 21st meetings?
[19:59] <rww> so no more meetings this month, one in December, and two in January
[19:59] <rww> (if you got the email, that's option 2A)
[20:04] <pleia2> rww: wfm
[20:04] <rww> alrighty. barring further mailing list posts, I'll announce that Sunday
[20:04] <pleia2> thanks :)
[20:04]  * pleia2 still working way through inbox, hasn't made her way to the folders yet
[21:35] <nhaines> Well, it was fun arguing over in the OMG Ubuntu comments, but now I have to get some work done.
[21:36] <nhaines> ianorlin: 5th edition Unix!  http://www.kernelthread.com/publications/gbaunix/
[21:36] <darthrobot> Title: [UNIX® on the Game Boy Advance]


[09:52] <BluesKaj> 'Morning folks
[14:58] <BluesKaj> another deliberately dumb name has been chosen by Mark Shuttleworth for 18.04 "Brillintly Bionic" !
[14:58] <BluesKaj> http://www.markshuttleworth.com/archives/1518
[14:59] <ducasse> BluesKaj: no, it's "bionic beaver" - read through to the end
[14:59]  * dax licks the /topic
[14:59] <BluesKaj> oh lord ducasse, that's even worse  :-0
[15:02] <BluesKaj> I still think wayland is for the adventurous ...gonna stick with X11 for now
[15:02] <ducasse> BluesKaj: it didn't even strike me until someone from the us pointed it out, tbh. i frankly don't care, it's just going to be referred to as 'bionic' anyhow...
[15:02] <nacc> BluesKaj: the only issue i ran into on upgrade was the wayland sessionn did nnot like my old ~/.config or ~/.local something
[15:02] <nacc> BluesKaj: so it wouldn't let me login :)
[15:03] <ducasse> bad wayland! bad!
[15:04] <nacc> heh
[15:05] <ducasse> did you find out what it was choking on?
[15:05] <BluesKaj> nacc, luvly , I'm on kde/plasma/nvidia so nouveau is my only choice with wayland , but there's not much that makes me want to use it since most of my fav features aren't available
[15:05] <nacc> ducasse: i didn't have time, was heads down on the release
[16:32] <BluesKaj> Development starts in only two days, on October 26, when the toolchain is uploaded to the archives,    http://news.softpedia.com/news/ubuntu-18-04-lts-dubbed-as-the-bionic-beaver-launches-april-26-2018-518186.shtml