[08:07] <Saviq> Belated good morning o/
[08:18] <alan_g[m]> o/
[09:40] -GitHub[m]:#mir-server- **[MirServer/mir]** Saviq opened [issue #2501](https://github.com/MirServer/mir/issues/2501): Inclusive language problems... (full message at https://libera.ems.host/_matrix/media/r0/download/libera.chat/cbadfab34894e10f36f8a5550d0fafee436605a5)
[09:52] -GitHub[m]:#mir-server- **[MirServer/wlcs]** Saviq opened [issue #241](https://github.com/MirServer/wlcs/issues/241): Inclusive language problems... (full message at https://libera.ems.host/_matrix/media/r0/download/libera.chat/987f5856eeb30759a191b781b3027a7102ec9868)
[12:42] -GitHub[m]:#mir-server- **[MirServer/mir]** bors[bot] merged [pull request #2483](https://github.com/MirServer/mir/pull/2483): scene/BasicSurface: Switch to a data-owning Mutex
[16:20] <Saviq> OK good night all o/
[16:20] <alan_g[m]> See you in the AM
[19:14] <grayson-g[m]> Has anyone ever seen this in snapcraft?... (full message at https://libera.ems.host/_matrix/media/r0/download/libera.chat/b27005a6349e9ae7a225e9b21c6048f7c4bbdee2)
[20:07] <grayson-g[m]> > <@grayson-g:matrix.org> Has anyone ever seen this in snapcraft?... (full message at https://libera.ems.host/_matrix/media/r0/download/libera.chat/c15f6d96d039b83f20224bfd25b4f6086a9fc585)
[20:08] <Saviq> grayson-g I filled this way back
[20:08] <Saviq> https://bugs.launchpad.net/snapcraft/+bug/1831135
[20:10] <Saviq> But was unable to reproduce recently… it's an elusive one
[20:11] <Saviq> The other one may well be https://bugs.launchpad.net/snapcraft/+bug/1841892
[20:12] <grayson-g[m]> > <@saviq:matrix.org> grayson-g I filled this way back
[20:12] <grayson-g[m]> >
[20:12] <grayson-g[m]> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/snapcraft/+bug/1831135
[20:12] <grayson-g[m]> I came across this when researching it but I wasn't sure if the cause was different as my error was the version was set in the pull step instead of build.
[20:12] <Saviq> It's the worst CLI UX ever when options are positional :P
[20:12] <Saviq> grayson-g[m]: Doesn't matter the step, same problem still
 "The other one may well be https:..." <- If you're referring to why `clean` wasn't working, you're on the nose. I hadn't realized this.
[20:18] <Saviq> Yup, that.