[01:35] <bonny> how do i update google chromium on lx terminal
[01:39] <Unit193> "sudo apt-get update" then "sudo apt-get install chromium" without quotes
[01:39] <bonny> ok thnx
[01:40] <bonny> thankyou unit
[01:41] <bonny> would i do that for any web browser
[01:42] <bonny> it still says i need to update it
[01:47] <Unit193> sudo apt-get update then sudo apt-get upgrade to update all programs
[01:47] <bonny> do i press enter after sudo apt-get update
[01:50] <Unit193> yeah
[01:52] <amin2511> chromium-browser --version
[01:53] <MrChrisDruif> Isn't chromium-webbrowser installed by default? (Chromium is some kind of game ;))
[01:54] <MrChrisDruif> *browser
[01:56] <amin2511> sudo apt-get update
[01:56] <amin2511> sudo apt-get install chromium-browser
[01:56] <bonny> ok
[01:56] <amin2511> isn't it ?
[01:57] <Unit193> Yeah, my bad
[01:59] <bonny> i need to upgrade the whole system so im listening to unit right now
[02:00] <bonny> i mean upgrade watever there is needed to be upgraded
[02:01] <amin2511> sudo apt-get update
[02:01] <Unit193> "sudo apt-get update" then "sudo apt-get upgrade" then "sudo apt-get dist-upgrade"
[02:01] <amin2511>  than sudo apt-get upgrade
[02:04] <imacalcutt> I already have 10.10 installed, but would like to test 11.04. If I install them side by side on my computer will I be able to boot either one when starting my computer?
[02:05] <bonny> yep thats what i did but i did this sudo apt-get update then sudo apt-get upgrade
[02:05] <bonny> imacalcutt what distro do you use
[02:06] <imacalcutt> i am using lubuntu 10.10
[02:06] <bonny> ok
[02:06] <bonny> well are u installing 11.o4 from live cd
[02:06] <imacalcutt> I understand that 11.04 is not stable, but I would like to test it
[02:06] <imacalcutt> yes
[02:07] <bonny> well i think there is a choice of installing them side by side
[02:07] <bonny> and it gives u a choice at the beginning i think
[02:07] <imacalcutt> If I install them side by side I will be able to boot either one
[02:07] <imacalcutt> ?
[02:07] <EricR2427> imacalcutt: yes
[02:07] <bonny> because i have peppermint and lubuntu on this computer and i can select which one at the begining
[02:08] <imacalcutt> Perfect
[02:08] <Unit193> Grub
[02:08] <imacalcutt> I want to keep the 10.10, but also wanted to test 11.04
[02:08] <imacalcutt> Thanks
[02:08] <bonny> u can do that imacalutt
[02:08] <imacalcutt> I understand
[02:08] <imacalcutt> thanks for the help
[02:08] <bonny> ok good :)
[02:09] <imacalcutt> I am using an older machine, will it slow down my machine
[02:09] <imacalcutt> ?
[02:09] <bonny> wat year is it
[02:09] <Unit193> You wouldn't be running both at the same time
[02:10] <imacalcutt> no not running both at the same time
[02:10] <imacalcutt> 2006
[02:10] <bonny> it will work just fine if its 2006
[02:10] <imacalcutt> thanks again
[02:10] <bonny> my computer this one is 2003
[02:11] <imacalcutt> its taken me a long time to find a program that will work well on my machine
[02:11] <imacalcutt> I don't want to mess up what I have
[02:11] <imacalcutt> appreciate the help
[02:11] <bonny> well if u want u can try puppy linux and maybe peppermint i found those two good peppermint is almost the same as lubuntu
[02:11] <bonny> but easier to use
[02:12] <imacalcutt> thanks
[02:13] <bonny> no problem just come back straight here if you need help
[02:14] <imacalcutt> I am kind of new at using at this, so I appreciate the wisdom
[02:15] <bonny> No problem
[02:15] <bonny> so am I
[02:15] <bonny> the funniest thing is that im only 10
[02:19] <Unit193> Puppy has it's own channel that may help you more if you look into it #puppylinux
[02:26] <bonny> yep units right like i mentioned u should check out puppy
[02:54] <bonny> how do i install google chrome not google chromium on lx terminal
[02:54] <Unit193> bonny: http://www.ubuntuupdates.org/ppa/google_chrome
[02:59] <bonny> ok
[13:45] <gilir> wolfpack, if you can't reproduce a bug with natty alpha :
[13:45] <gilir> 1) Add a comment to explain this
[13:45] <gilir> in the bug report
[13:45] <gilir> 2) ask the user to try with a new natty iso
[13:45] <gilir> 3) set the bug status to "Imcomplete"
[13:47] <wolfpack> gilir: Should I ask him to update the pcmannfm package ?
[13:47] <gilir> wolfpack, I need to update LXDE PPA first
[13:48] <gilir> wolfpack, after, you can add a comment that he can test with a newer version of pcmanfm using the LXDE PPA
[13:51] <wolfpack> The version of pcmanfm reported is 0.9.7 and repository has 0.9.8. Is it available for maverock also ?
[13:52] <gilir> wolfpack, 0.9.7 is in official repository, 0.9.8 is only availabel if you enable LXDE PPA : https://launchpad.net/~lxde/+archive/ppa
[13:53] <wolfpack> Ok. Thanks :)
[13:53] <gilir> not all users have its enable, and it's not mandatory to have it to use Lubuntu :)
[17:06] <Yorvyk> Hi all,
[17:08] <Yorvyk> Anybody else having problems with time out errors when using launchpad and Lubuntu 11.04
[17:09] <wolfpack> Yorvyk: Can you elaborate your problem a little more ?
[17:17] <NRWlion> !Pastebin
[18:13] <umino> hi guys
[18:13] <umino> can someone tell me how to get new window themes with lubuntu ?
[18:19] <szczur> you mean window borders?
[18:19] <szczur> http://box-look.org/index.php?xcontentmode=7402
[18:21] <umino> yeah .. like putting a darker, more ubuntu like theme on the bright lubuntu default theme
[18:22] <szczur> also take look at http://gnome-look.org/index.php?xcontentmode=100&PHPSESSID=b550a6802f72dbcb551d3340073c0b28
[18:22] <umino> ok ... thats where i get the themes but how do i install them ?
[18:22] <szczur> you can dowhnload the theme you like
[18:23] <szczur> and unpack it to .themes folder in your home folder
[18:24] <umino> what if there is no such folder (hidden stuff is visible)
[18:24] <szczur> then you have to create it
[18:25] <umino> ok ...
[18:27] <umino> ah ... so much for the colors but i still got this ugly mint-greenish window tops
[18:28] <kristian-aalborg> lubuntu kernel = ubuntu kernel?
[18:28] <umino> i guess
[18:29] <kristian-aalborg> also, hi
[18:29] <kristian-aalborg> I can't see why it shouldn't be, but nice to know
[18:31] <szczur> umino, you can change window borders with Openbox configuration manager
[18:31] <umino> lxappearance ?
[18:32] <umino> ah no ...
[18:32] <umino> sorry
[18:32] <umino> ok ... that was the stuff i was looking for ..
[18:33] <umino> thanks
[18:36] <umino> have a nice day
[19:41] <Yorvyk> Anybody know how to remove the 'window title bar' globally.
[19:53] <mark76> Have you tried ctrl alt b?
[20:18] <GaryD> How can I use xserver-xorg-video-nv instead of xserver-xorg-video-nouveau?
[20:18] <Yorvyk> mark76, Yes, I was hoping there was a config file I could edit
[20:27] <mark76> I'm pretty sure openbox has config files
[20:28] <GaryD> Sorry. I am running 11.04 by the way.I can't install nvidia-173 like I normally do because of the missing dependency issue. I would like to be able to see the objects on the screen.
[20:30] <Yorvyk> GaryD, You'll probably have to create and xorg.conf.
[20:32] <Yorvyk> mark76, there is, and there appears a to be a way to do it but I'm having problems understanding it. (.config/openbox/lubuntu-rc.xml)
[20:32] <stlsaint> Yorvyk: hey could you point me towards the lubuntu wiki page
[20:33] <Yorvyk> stlsaint,
[20:33] <stlsaint> ?
[20:33] <GaryD> Yorvyk: I tried killing X and running Xorg -configure as root, but got errors. Failed to create configuratoni file or something. I tried to uninstall nouveau, installing nv, and rebooting, i got the black screen of death. So I looked for a command to change which driver is used, and could find nothing. how can I create the xorg.conf?
[20:34] <Yorvyk> stlsaint, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Lubuntu
[20:35] <stlsaint> haha i thought it was something else
[20:40] <Yorvyk> GaryD, I could never get that to work
[20:43] <Yorvyk> GaryD, I'm not sure if the following works any more but worth a try.
[20:44] <Yorvyk> GaryD, sudo dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg
[20:46] <GaryD> did nothing as far as i can tell.
[20:47] <bioterror> GaryD,
[20:48] <bioterror> https://help.ubuntu.com/community/Lubuntu/Documentation/FAQ there you have guide
[20:48] <bioterror> section 2.6.
[20:48] <bioterror> oh, I have it wrong, should say lxdm, not gdm :D
[20:49] <bioterror> now it's right and correct
[20:52] <Yorvyk> 'sudo Xorg -configure' is the command I never remember but I can remember 'sudo dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg'
[20:53] <GaryD> I'll try. If it doesn't work, I will reinstall again and come back again. Thanks.
[21:15] <bioterror> hi
[21:15] <bioterror> did you install again?
[21:16] <Yorvyk> bioterror, thanks for that FAQ it solved my remove title bar problem.
[21:16] <bioterror> :o
[21:16] <bioterror> :D
[21:18] <GaryD> No good. Still a gray screen, and no xorg.conf file in root or /etc/X11/. I still got the error of not being able to create xorg.conf.
[21:19] <bioterror> you need to stop LXDM
[21:19] <bioterror> sudo service lxdm stop
[21:19] <bioterror> then you can create xorg.conf
[21:19] <GaryD> I ran both commands. Xorg -configure and dpkg-reconfigure-xserver-xorg.
[21:20] <GaryD> I did stop lxdm.
[21:20] <bioterror> what's the error message then
[21:21] <GaryD> Number of created screens do not match number of detected devices. Configuration failed.
[21:27] <GaryD> OK...for some reason, when I tried the mv xorg.conf.new /etc/X11/xorg.conf I got an error saying no such file exists. However, I just looked in pcmanfm, and the file is there. i am now copying it to /etc/X11. There are Screen0, Screen2 and Screen3.
[21:28] <GaryD> http://pastebin.com/ZcX70zrj
[21:30] <GaryD> should I remove lines 3 and 4 and the corresponding lines of code at the bottom for each screen?
[21:31] <bioterror> you have two displays and two graphics cards?
[21:33] <GaryD> As far as I have known I have one display and one graphics card. that is the problem.
[21:34] <GaryD> Can I just remove the second one from xorg.conf?
[21:35] <bioterror> you should have screen0 and card0 ;)
[21:36] <GaryD> I will modify it real quick..
[21:39] <GaryD> Does this look right? http://pastebin.com/qU3UeDs6
[21:47] <Yorvyk> GaryD, it looks a lot better than the first one.  I would stick with vesa first and if /when the Xorg.conf works change to nv
[21:47] <GaryD> ok. Thanks. I'll go try that.
[21:48] <Yorvyk> Lubuntu Unity any one? http://imagebin.org/142453
[21:52] <bioterror> I have to say this: I dont like that pastel blue theme
[22:03] <Yorvyk> I'am not a fan of blue but, it is innocuous and doesn't cause problems on CRT's.
[22:04] <bioterror> problems on CRT's? :D
[22:10] <Yorvyk> There are a lot still in use and on most the colour balance is out.  Even on old LCD monitors as well.  Blue seems to work better.
[22:12] <Yorvyk> GaryD, any luck
[22:13] <GaryD> No good. Both vesa and nv allow plymouth to load clear as day, but after that black screen. i can't even use ctrl+alt+F1, I changed it back to nouveau, and it is still the same as before. Why would plymouth load clearly now, but not the desktop?
[22:15] <Yorvyk> It doesn't sound like the video driver to me then.  What do the logs have to say?
[22:22] <GaryD> The only errors in the log is that the fonts directories don't exist, as far as I can tell. Should I pastebin? I have the one for vesa, as i tried it first and after nv before I went back to nouveau.
[22:26] <GaryD> Could it be an issue with lxdm?
[22:27] <GaryD> this is in the lxdm config file under [server]. # arg=/usr/bin/X -nr vt1. not sure if this has anything to do with it.
[22:27] <GaryD> it is commented out, though.
[22:28] <GaryD> argh.
[22:32] <Yorvyk> argh indeed
[22:32] <GaryD> Xorg log - http://pastebin.com/8ULxa2vA
[22:32] <GaryD> for vesa.
[22:38] <GaryD> BTW...I thank you for helping me with this.
[22:44] <GaryD> Do you think installing nouveau-firmware will clear up my screen using nouveau? Not sure what the firmware is for.
[22:48] <Yorvyk> no idea what the firmware does, never heard of it.
[22:50] <GaryD> My video card is nvidia NV36 GeForce FX Go570. on all other lubuntus, nv worked just fine and nvidia-173 worked jut fine as well.
[22:50] <GaryD> nouveau has never worked.
[22:51] <GaryD> sorry...GeForce FX 5700
[22:56] <Yorvyk> Sorry GaryD my machine came to a grinding halt load average: 3.99, 5.27, 2.74 every thing was trying to use the cpu
[22:56] <GaryD> dang.
[22:56] <GaryD> sorry
[22:59] <GaryD> Did it come back alive?
[23:03] <GaryD> Well, I appreciate it. I have to go, now. I will mess with it later. If I can't get it working, I will go back to lubuntu 10.10.
[23:03] <Yorvyk> What resolution is your screen
[23:04] <GaryD> 1280x768
[23:05] <Yorvyk> It seems to think it's either 800x600 or 1024x768
[23:07] <Yorvyk> Try http://pastebin.com/556Xh3UC when you have time, i'll be around tomorrow.
[23:07] <GaryD> I will try it now. I have a minute.
[23:08] <Yorvyk> OK
[23:09] <GaryD> Let me restart to see if it works. BRB
[23:19] <GaryD> No Good.
[23:20] <GaryD> Yorvyk: I will have to test other things later, I guess. Thank you for all your help
[23:20] <GaryD> Yorvyk: Have a great day!
[23:20] <Yorvyk> OH!  I'll have anothe rlook at the log and let you know tomorrow if I find any thing.
[23:20] <Yorvyk> Night#
[23:20] <GaryD> Cool. Thanks


[10:08] <dpm> cjwatson, wgrant, do you have a minute for a question about project aliases? I aliased lp:reminders-app to 'notes-app', with then realizing there was an existing lp:notes-app project. Now I don't seem to be able to remove the alias, and when submitting a MP against lp:reminders, LP says that branches are not mergeable (as it seems to try to merge them against lp:notes-app)
[10:08] <dpm> Is there any way to fix the alias?
[10:10] <wgrant> dpm: Hm, I wouldn't expect you to be able to create an alias. What exactly did you do?
[10:10] <wgrant> Oh, you're in ~registry, forgot that detail.
[10:10] <dpm> wgrant, went to https://launchpad.net/reminders-app/+admin and set an alias to 'notes-app'
[10:10] <dpm> as the app is no longer named 'reminders-app'
[10:10] <wgrant> dpm: The alias would have failed to set.
[10:11] <wgrant> Do you perhaps want to rename the project and leave an alias from the old name?
[10:11] <dpm> wgrant, if that helps fixing it, yes, but there is the existing lp:notes-app project
[10:11] <wgrant> A project can't have an alias that matches the name of an existing project; LP will refuse to save the form.
[10:12] <wgrant> Are they related?
[10:12] <wgrant> notes-app also looks to be a phone app.
[10:12] <wgrant> Having two phone apps named notes-app sounds like a bad idea.
[10:12] <dpm> no, they're not related. The old one is abandoned
[10:13] <wgrant> If you can convince the maintainer of the old one to consent to renaming or deleting it, we can then rename reminders-app in its place.
[10:13] <dpm> wgrant, do you suggest renaming the two?
[10:13] <dpm> wgrant, ok. Is there anything we can do now to fix the alias in the meantime?
[10:13] <wgrant> dpm: The alias doesn't exist, so there's nothing to fix.
[10:15] <dpm> wgrant, but I still can't propose merges
[10:15] <wgrant> dpm: If you pushed a branch to notes-app then it's in a totally unrelated project. You'll need to move the branch to reminders-app.
[10:16] <wgrant> notes-app and reminders-app are presently unrelated.
[10:16] <wgrant> So it doesn't make sense to merge between them.
[10:16] <wgrant> (this is true even if we rename notes-app away; the branch will still be in that project)
[10:38] <dpm> wgrant, hm, I don't think we can easily rename the original lp:notes-app project. Even if it's no longer active, there are packages for Ubuntu. In any case, I still have the issue I cannot do MP against lp:reminders. It seems it's trying to do the merge against lp:notes-app
[10:40] <dpm> I think I broke something when I initially tried to set the alias, but I'm not sure what it is
[10:40] <wgrant> dpm: You need to move (or repush) the branch to the right project.
[10:40] <wgrant> There is no alias, you just pushed to the wrong project.
[10:40] <wgrant> lp:~dpm/notes-app/foo is in the notes-app project, so you can't merge it into the reminders-app project.
[10:41] <dpm> wgrant, I don't think so, I pushed against the right project: https://code.launchpad.net/~dpm/reminders-app/fix-deb-build
[10:42] <wgrant> dpm: That defaults to proposing into lp:reminders-app for me.
[10:43] <wgrant> Oh
[10:43] <wgrant> lp:reminders-app is in the notes-app project.
[10:43] <wgrant> dpm: Did you also reconfigure the project's default branch?
[10:43] <wgrant> Or move a branch around?
[10:43] <dpm> wgrant, http://i.imgur.com/HeJQ8gn.png
[10:44] <wgrant> dpm: If you look at the code of https://code.launchpad.net/~notes-app-dev/notes-app/trunk, is that notes-app or reminders-app?
[10:44] <wgrant> It's in the notes-app project, but is set as the default branch for reminders-app.
[10:44] <wgrant> Which doesn't make sense.
[10:44] <dpm> wgrant, hm, I'm confused now. That url points to the reminders app code
[10:45] <wgrant> It looks like someone might have moved the branch to the notes-app project in an attempt to rename it.
[10:45] <wgrant> Manually.
[10:45] <wgrant> What about the notes-app-dev team? Which one is that?
[10:46] <dpm> That could only have been me, but I didn't move branches around. I tried aliases only IIRC
[10:46] <dpm> let me check the dev team. I only tried to change the project, not the team
[10:46] <wgrant> So, I think you want to move that trunk branch back to reminders-app, and then probably rename the team if that team is actually for reminders-app.
[10:47] <wgrant> LP should forbid that branch from being trunk for a different project, but there's no general project alias bug here.
[10:47] <wgrant> The alias doesn't exist, the branch is just linked in a super-weird way.
[10:47] <dpm> Re: the team, I think there is only https://code.launchpad.net/~notes-app-dev (it used to be reminders-app-dev, but I'm guessing either I or someone else changed it a while ago, but not today)
[10:48] <wgrant> Alright.
[10:48] <wgrant> So I think it's probably an idea to rename it back to avoid this confusion.
[10:48] <dpm> the notes-app team is phablet-team
[10:48] <wgrant> Once you're settled on what the project's new name should be, we can rename the team and project together.
[10:48] <wgrant> And the branch definitely needs to be moved back to the reminders-app project.
[10:50] <dpm> wgrant, ideally the new project name for lp:reminders-app should be lp:notes-app, but as there is the existing lp:notes-app one and I'd rather not generate too much work for everyone, then I think I'd leave it at lp:reminders
[10:50] <wgrant> dpm: lp:reminders or lp:reminders-app?
[10:50] <wgrant> It's currently lp:reminders-app..
[10:50] <dpm> argh, sorry, lp:reminders-app
[10:51] <wgrant> dpm: So, on https://code.launchpad.net/~notes-app-dev/notes-app/trunk/+edit change the target from notes-app to reminders-app
[10:51] <wgrant> Then on https://launchpad.net/~notes-app-dev/+edit change it from notes-app-dev to reminders-app-dev
[10:51] <wgrant> And I think that's all the weirdness I know about.
[10:52] <dpm> I think the second step might not be needed, as the team name's seems to be the correct one and doesn't clash with any other one
[10:52] <dpm> let me see if that fixed the MP weirdness
[10:52] <wgrant> But ~notes-app-dev is for reminders-app, not notes-app
[10:53] <wgrant> It doesn't conflict with an existing team, but it's awfully confusing.
[10:55] <dpm> right, it's the team for the correct branch, but the naming is confusing. I'd rather have a chat with the team before changing that again
[10:55] <dpm> in any case, the MPs work again, thanks!
[18:46] <jtaylor> hi, are there plans to add u2f support to launchpad/ubuntu-sso?


[00:14] <valorie> vish, I'll go check
[00:18] <valorie> accepted
[19:19] <akgraner>  Have you all heard about this already - GNOME Outreach Program for Women internships - http://live.gnome.org/GnomeWomen/OutreachProgram2010/SpreadTheWord
[19:19] <nigelb> Nice :)
[19:20] <akgraner> I sent to the mailing list as well
[19:23]  * svaksha needs to remember to blog about it.
[19:24] <akgraner> Seems exciting - they also have some non-coding projects as well on the list
[19:25] <svaksha> yep, that is a first


[05:44] <mborzecki> morning
[06:26] <mborzecki> hmm why do the remodel unit tests fail on lp?
[06:58] <ares0128> Good morning, I am work adding a tpm_tis_spi module into /etc/modules file to into Ubuntu Core image. Which is done by modifying the kernel of Raspberry Pi4. Which is the pi-kernel snap I am using. How do I modify that snap to add the modules ?
[07:12] <mborzecki> ogra: ^^
[07:14] <mborzecki> ares0128: it's probably bit easier if you ask this question in the forum, i think this is the branch the pi kernel is built from: https://git.launchpad.net/~canonical-kernel-snaps/+git/kernel-snaps-uc20/log/?h=pi
[07:19] <ares0128> OK thanks i will ask there :)
[07:30] <mardy> hi mborzecki, mvo
[07:33] <mvo> good morning mardy and mborzecki
[07:48] <mborzecki> hey
[07:56] <tuxinator> hi guys
[07:56] <tuxinator> i want to give it a try to install/compile snapd on Mageia Linux as there are no instructions for Mageia on your Website and i miss compile instructions, any hint for me? Source https://github.com/snapcore/snapd
[07:57] <mardy> tuxinator: please have a look at HACKING.md
[07:58] <mardy> tuxinator: and welcome, by the way! :_)
[08:00] <mardy> mborzecki: I'm running the spread tests with my nasty cgroup branch, and I'm getting this error: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/FZyDP5jBpC/
[08:01] <mardy> mborzecki: the journal just says: systemd[6456]: snap.test-snapd-policy-app-consumer.block-devices.708b71aa-d751-47ad-b84e-42a1f154ba78.scope: Failed to add PIDs to scope's control group: Permission denied
[08:05] <tuxinator> mardy: thx, however i just discovered for what reason some Distros don't support Snapd, my god is that a mess
[08:05] <mardy> mborzecki: the command run by the spread test is "tests.session -u test exec /snap/bin/test-snapd-policy-app-consumer.block-devices"; but if I just execute the binary, it works
[08:06] <tuxinator> i am 20+ years experienced in Linux System Engineering, but looking at that shocks me, will probably be faser to write my own Anbox before getting Snapd running :D
[08:06] <tuxinator> *faster* :D
[08:12] <mardy> tuxinator: maybe other people in this channel can give you better advice (as I never tried running snapd in a distro other than Linux), but we'd be happy to have snapd running in Mageia too.
[08:13] <mup> PR core20#115 closed: Start bootchart earlier <Created by alfonsosanchezbeato> <Merged by alfonsosanchezbeato> <https://github.com/snapcore/core20/pull/115>
[08:13] <mardy> tuxinator: I wonder if you would find the Fedora's spec file somehow helpful: https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/blob/master/packaging/fedora/snapd.spec
[08:14] <tuxinator> mardy: that spec file shocks me even more and shows the complete mess!
[08:14] <tuxinator> a 10k lines spec file? Snapd devs must be joking
[08:15] <tuxinator> ok 1k without changelogs
[08:15] <tuxinator> still way to much
[08:16] <tuxinator> Better not use Snapd and don't break my System or mess it and create a chaos by installing Snapd, sorry to say but thats only my humble opinion
[08:17] <tuxinator> Thanks for the Idea and all those lines of code and the time they put in it, but no thx, think i will not use it then
[08:17] <mborzecki> tuxinator: probably easiest to start with rebuilding the rpm using either the fedora spec or one for opensuse
[08:21] <mborzecki> tuxinator: and well, it's long because the fedora spec is actually used for all versions of fedora and epel, not sure why you think a long spec file is somehow special
[09:13] <mup> PR snapd#10875 opened: client: fail fast on non-retryable errors <Created by MiguelPires> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/10875>
[09:49] <mvo> mardy: 10861 is ready for re-review
[09:50] <mvo> mardy: thanks for the suggestion there btw, really much nicer now IMHO
[11:13] <miguelpires> mvo: hi, can you merge this https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/10869 please?
[11:13] <mup> PR #10869: o/snapstate: use device ctx in prerequisite install/update <Created by MiguelPires> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/10869>
[11:54] <mup> PR snapd#10871 closed: many: support an API flag system-restart-immediate to make snap ops proceed immediately with system restarts <Squash-merge> <Created by pedronis> <Merged by pedronis> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/10871>
[12:04] <mup> PR snapd#10876 opened:  o/devicestate, o/servicestate: update gadget assets and cmdline when remodeling <Run nested> <Created by bboozzoo> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/10876>
[13:04] <mup> PR snapd#10877 opened: many: support an API flag system-restart-immediate to make snap ops proceed immediately with system restarts (2.52) <Created by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/10877>
[14:14] <mup> PR snapd#10872 closed: osutil/disks: support filtering by mount opts in MountPointsForPartitionRoot <Simple 😃> <Skip spread> <Created by anonymouse64> <Merged by anonymouse64> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/10872>
[15:03] <mvo> ijohnson[m]: 10861 is ready for re-review :)
[15:06] <mup> PR snapcraft#3585 closed: repo: use host state for apt cache (CRAFT-488) <Created by cmatsuoka> <Merged by sergiusens> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/3585>
[15:31] <miguelpires> mvo: can you merge https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/10869 please? failures are unrelated
[15:31] <mup> PR #10869: o/snapstate: use device ctx in prerequisite install/update <Created by MiguelPires> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/10869>
[15:39] <mvo> miguelpires: sure
[15:40] <mup> PR snapd#10869 closed: o/snapstate: use device ctx in prerequisite install/update <Created by MiguelPires> <Merged by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/10869>
[15:43] <mvo> mborzecki: can 10870 land ? I have not looked at the failures
[15:50] <mup> PR snapd#10777 closed: interfaces/modem-manager: add access to PCIe modems <Created by alfonsosanchezbeato> <Merged by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/10777>
[15:50] <mup> PR snapd#10870 closed: overlord/devicestate: record recovery capable system on a successful remodel <Run nested> <Created by bboozzoo> <Merged by mvo5> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/10870>
[16:02] <ijohnson[m]> pstolowski: hey did we implement support for gate-auto-refresh hook being called for kernel/base refreshes too? or was that not done for the initial version ?
[16:11] <mup> PR snapcraft#3518 closed: yaml: detect and log warning on duplicate keys in snapcraft.yaml (CRAFT-553) <Created by cjp256> <Merged by sergiusens> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapcraft/pull/3518>
[22:31] <mup> PR snapd#10878 opened: interfaces/builtin/time-control: allow pps access <Created by kubiko> <https://github.com/snapcore/snapd/pull/10878>