[07:36] <lpotter> unity8 hates me
[08:36] <tsdgeos> karni: ping
[08:36] <karni> tsdgeos: hi
[08:37] <tsdgeos> karni: are you aware of a bug of the telegram app in which the text and button of the welcome screen overlap?
[08:37] <tsdgeos> want a screenshot?
[08:37] <karni> tsdgeos: was this in landscape mode perhaps?
[08:37] <tsdgeos> no it's portrait
[08:37] <karni> (FWIW we disabled landscape mode for such reasons, as it was enabled for a while unintentionally)
[08:37] <karni> tsdgeos: Nexus 4?
[08:37] <tsdgeos> Meizu
[08:38] <tsdgeos> not sure which version of the app though
[08:38] <tsdgeos> the one that comes when flashin
[08:38] <tsdgeos> not sure if the store has something newer
[08:38] <karni> tsdgeos: I see. I'm aware of this, but please do file a bug. https://bugs.launchpad.net/telegram-app/+filebug
[08:38] <karni> I'm not sure if we have it properly filed already or just in my head :D
[08:38] <tsdgeos> :D
[08:39] <karni> tsdgeos: ah.. then I think I may have even fixed it
[08:39] <tsdgeos> i saw a new version on the store
[08:39] <tsdgeos> let me recheck
[08:39] <karni> tsdgeos: bottom of the telegram settings screen, says the version. which one is it?
[08:39] <tsdgeos> ah yes
[08:39] <tsdgeos> fiixed
[08:39] <tsdgeos> sorry :/
[08:39] <karni> tsdgeos: np :)!
[08:40] <karni> thanks for reporting
[08:40] <tsdgeos> i thought todays image would have latest thing
[08:40] <tsdgeos> but i guess for store apps works diferently
[08:46] <tsdgeos> mzanetti: ping
[08:46] <mzanetti> hi tsdgeos
[08:46] <tsdgeos> mzanetti: your thing for the folded delegte works indeed better
[08:46] <tsdgeos> but i do not understand why :D
[08:46] <mzanetti> heh, no?
[08:47] <tsdgeos> FoldingLauncherDelegate.qml offset is 0 for the last and first
[08:47] <tsdgeos> or so seems to say the code
[08:47] <mzanetti> don't think so. let me open the code
[08:47] <tsdgeos> but given how it behaves i'd say doesn't do that really?
[08:47] <tsdgeos> ah wait
[08:47] <tsdgeos> can't read :D
[08:48] <mzanetti> that's the offset that keeps items inside the panel
[08:48] <tsdgeos> yes yes
[09:30] <tsdgeos> cimi: ping
[09:33] <cimi> tsdgeos, pong
[09:34] <tsdgeos> cimi: see the question i made on the binding branch
[09:34] <tsdgeos> cimi: https://code.launchpad.net/~cimi/unity8/preview-sharing-fix-broken-binding/+merge/280875
[09:34] <cimi> tsdgeos, I think pawel made a click
[09:35] <tsdgeos> pstolowski: ping-o-matic
[09:35] <cimi> tsdgeos, lp:~stolowski/+junk/scope-previewtest
[09:35] <cimi> tsdgeos, in the click dir
[09:35] <pstolowski> yeah
[09:35] <tsdgeos> k
[09:38] <pstolowski> tsdgeos, cimi hold on, it's currently using the old naming (shareData)
[09:38] <cimi> yeah.....
[09:39] <pstolowski> tsdgeos, give me 5 minutes and i'll update it
[09:41] <tsdgeos> oki
[09:48] <pstolowski> tsdgeos, done. no guarantess though, i wasn't able to test this since it was broken
[09:56] <tsdgeos> pstolowski: cimi: so what broke before?
[09:56] <pstolowski> tsdgeos, no icons/buttons for sharing were displayed for me
[09:56] <tsdgeos> ok
[09:57] <tsdgeos> it does not
[09:57] <tsdgeos> and i can get to the content hub
[09:57] <pstolowski> (before or after my renaming)
[09:57] <tsdgeos> i tried sharing it on telegram
[09:57] <tsdgeos> and it failed
[09:57] <tsdgeos> but that may be something different
[09:57] <pstolowski> uhm
[09:57] <tsdgeos> maybe there's not even anything to really share
[09:57] <tsdgeos> not sure what you coded :D
[09:58] <pstolowski> tsdgeos, yeah i probably make a mistake. i'm sharing the path of the art (local file), setting content-type to 'links'
[09:59] <tsdgeos> anyhow i'll approve cimi's change
[09:59] <tsdgeos> since it's a step forward
[09:59] <mzanetti> tsdgeos, hey, xvfbtestShell segfaulting for you too?
[09:59] <tsdgeos> and you can use http://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/job/generic-mediumtests-builder-vivid-armhf/5937/artifact/work/output/*zip*/output.zip to decide where the next mistake is :D
[09:59] <tsdgeos> mzanetti: on master unity8?
[09:59] <mzanetti> yes
[10:00] <tsdgeos> xenial or vivid?
[10:00] <mzanetti> x
[10:00] <conkey3> e
[10:00] <pstolowski> tsdgeos, sure
[10:00] <pstolowski> tsdgeos, unity8 seems ok if you got that far
[10:01] <tsdgeos> you never know, but yeah at least it's an improvement :D
[10:01] <tsdgeos> mzanetti: let me recompile just in case
[10:06] <tsdgeos> mzanetti: ah, maxDelta
[10:06] <tsdgeos> mzanetti: https://code.launchpad.net/~dandrader/unity8/fixDragHandleTest/+merge/280733
[10:06] <mzanetti> ah, nice
[10:06] <tsdgeos> if we could land some of these branches it'd be awesome
[10:07] <tsdgeos> we have so many qmluitests failing witih branches that fix it
[10:07] <tsdgeos> that's getting hard to keep track of which branch fixes what
[10:07] <tsdgeos> and if the failures are really fixed or not
[10:10] <mzanetti> yeah...
[10:10] <mzanetti> anyone knows what's up with landings?
[10:10] <mzanetti> the queue is bigger than ever before
[10:10] <tsdgeos> Saviq has a mega-silo somewhere
[10:10] <tsdgeos> not sure what's holding it
[10:12] <pstolowski> it wasn't qa'ed yet it seems
[10:12] <pstolowski> inline-playback was qa-granted yesterday though, so unity8 silos will need rebuilding
[13:20] <tsdgeos> karni: another thing about the telgram app, it doesn't sync read status from other clients, no?
[13:27] <tsdgeos> or at least doesn't remove the notifications from the "new notifications"
[13:35] <karni> tsdgeos: yes. Telegram currently don't send this type of notification to the phones. it's something I'm aware of, but is not planned for, at least not in near future.
[13:41] <tsdgeos> karni: to our phones only though, no? Because my other non Ubuntu phone properly retracts the "blinking light of unread messages" when i read the message on the web
[13:42] <karni> tsdgeos: they don't send it to Ubuntu only. I don't know if it works or not with Windows. I know it does with Android, and most probably with iOS as well.
[13:42] <tsdgeos> ok
[14:57] <Saviq> pstolowski, tsdgeos, that was the plan - to get playback in, then my mega silo
[15:00] <pstolowski> coolio
[15:01] <Saviq> with dpr in between, greyback how's that going?
[15:03] <greyback> Saviq: all good, everything ready for QA. Just worried about FF
[15:03] <Saviq> greyback, we're good for FF AFAICT, shall we switch to "ready for qa" then?
[15:03] <greyback> yes yes yes
[15:06] <greyback> dun
[15:06] <Saviq> pstolowski, fyi, it's the lander that needs to press "publish" now, it doesn't happen automagically or by trainguards
[15:07] <pstolowski> Saviq, oh, thanks for the hint
[15:07] <Saviq> pstolowski, I'm taking care of it now
[15:07] <pstolowski> Saviq, i think it said you're not allowed?
[15:07] <Saviq> pstolowski, not any more
[15:08] <Saviq> pstolowski, if there's packaging changes, it will tell you and you need to ping a core dev (what I did just now)
[15:08] <Saviq> but if there are none, you can do yourself
[15:09] <Saviq> pstolowski, ah wait,
[15:09] <Saviq> pstolowski, that I didn't expect
[15:09] <Saviq> robru, I think I misunderstood you before when you said there's no special rights for publishing, https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-004-2-publish/1/console ?
[15:10] <Saviq> wonder why, I'm a member of both driver and maintainer teams
[15:11] <pstolowski> Saviq, note, the warning re mediascanner scope changelog can be ignored as discussed before xmas
[15:11] <Saviq> pstolowski, yup
[15:19] <Saviq> greyback, mzanetti, can you please add comment on https://requests.ci-train.ubuntu.com/#/ticket/776 where was it tested
[15:19] <pstolowski> uh, what is it this time? is it a the consequence of changelog issue?
[15:21] <mzanetti> done
[16:27] <Saviq> dandrader|lunch, please merge qtmir trunk in sizeHints
[16:40] <Saviq> ltinkl, hey, there's a conflict between lp:~lukas-kde/unity8/fixLauncherDismiss and either lp:~mzanetti/unity8/launcher_folded_quicklist or lp:~mzanetti/unity8/launcher-updates, can you please check and resubmit as appropriate? https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-031-1-build/lastBuild/console
[16:41] <ltinkl> Saviq, yup, will do
[16:43] <Saviq> tx
[16:44] <ltinkl> Saviq, the former merges fine
[16:45] <ltinkl> Saviq, and a conflict in the latter; will rebase
[16:49] <Saviq> ltinkl, re: our discussion yesterday https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Sound
[16:52] <ltinkl> Saviq, hmm, on unity7 the Mute action is a mode
[16:53] <ltinkl> Saviq, so this suggests on u8, it should behave differently
[16:53] <Saviq> ltinkl, yeah I know, and the obvious question is "how do I prevent sounds from playing" when mute is what is described there
[16:59] <ltinkl> Saviq, resubmitted https://code.launchpad.net/~lukas-kde/unity8/fixLauncherDismiss/+merge/282031 on top of lp:~mzanetti/unity8/launcher-updates
[17:02] <mzanetti> thanks ltinkl
[17:59] <dandrader> Saviq, done
[19:42] <robru> Saviq: train guards no longer have any special publishing power, the train goes by who has archive upload rights. But anyone can publish as long as there's no packaging diff
[20:51] <mterry> Saviq, mzanetti: I've been dogfooding rc-proposed for a while and haven't noticed a resurgence of the dreaded "three-power-press" bug where the screen won't turn on at first.  Have either of you?
[21:18] <conkey3> mterry, it happened to me a couple of time on arale/rc-proposed
[21:18] <mterry> conkey3, grrr -- within the last month?
[21:18] <conkey3> mterry, yep
[21:18] <conkey3> 2 days ago
[21:19] <conkey3> or 3
[21:19] <conkey3> this week
[21:19] <conkey3> mostly when the phone is connected to the pc via usb
[21:20] <conkey3> mostly aka only
[21:21] <conkey3> night all o/
[21:29] <mzanetti> mterry, I think I saw it once still too, yes, it did improve but wouldn't say it disappeared completely
[21:30] <mterry> mzanetti, ah well.  Had a fleeting hope
[21:30] <mzanetti> mterry, different cause maybe... it did improve a lot
[23:18] <Saviq> robru, why "foo is not authorized to upload bar", then?
[23:18] <robru> Saviq: because you're not authorized in that particular instance.
[23:19] <robru> Saviq: if it says you're not authorized, you need to find core dev / motu / ppu to do the publish for you. but if there's no packaging diff then you are authorized.
[23:21] <Saviq> robru, but but but... https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-004-2-publish/1/console is different to https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-004-2-publish/2/console
[23:21] <robru> Saviq: yes, that's because lukas is authorized.
[23:21] <Saviq> one says "not authorized", the other says "need manual acking", not to mention that unity-scope-mediascanner didn't have packaging diffs :P
[23:22] <Saviq> oh well I'm lying
[23:22] <Saviq> it did
[23:22] <robru> Saviq: yeah https://ci-train.ubuntu.com/job/ubuntu-landing-004-1-build/lastBuild/
[23:22] <Saviq> then u-s-m was just the first one reported?
[23:22] <robru> Saviq: if you're authorized to ack the packaging changes, the error will be "requires ack". if you're not authorized, the message is "not authorized"
[23:22] <robru> Saviq: yeah it just bails out on the first one it finds
[23:23] <Saviq> robru, could use an update to the "not authorized" message to say it's because of packaging changes

[23:23] <robru> Saviq: it's ALWAYS because of packaging changes
[23:23] <Saviq> robru, it doesn't SAY so :P
[23:23] <Saviq> ;)
[23:24] <robru> Saviq: you're not the first person to complain about this
[23:25] <robru> Saviq: I don't really understand the complaint, I mean, if you're not authorized you need to find somebody who is
[23:25] <robru> (which is never me)
[23:25] <robru> at least until I get off my butt and apply for motu
[23:25] <Saviq> robru, thing is the message is misleading, because uploading (without packaging diffs) does not require authorization
[23:26] <robru> Saviq: but what difference does it make though? if it says 'not authorized due to packaging diffs' then you still need to go find somebody who is authorized. it shouldn't change your response
[23:28] <Saviq> robru, it does change it in that I won't be hunting for reasons why I'm not authorized
[23:28] <Saviq> and will know I won't be, otherwise I start thinking maybe I'm not in the team who can upload $package, especially since it only mentions one of them
[23:29] <robru> hmm
[23:35] <robru> Saviq: ok I added a note to the message that you're not authorized because a diff was found.
[23:35] <Saviq> success! ;)
[23:35] <Saviq> robru, thanks ;)
[23:39] <robru> Saviq: you're welcome