[00:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted pymacaroons [source] (artful-proposed) [0.12.0-1~ubuntu17.10.1]
[00:44] <nacc_> slangasek: please reject s2tc from the new queue (LP: #1752198)
[00:44] <ubot5`> Launchpad bug 1752198 in steam (Ubuntu) "Steam is not installable on Ubuntu 18.04" [Critical,Fix committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1752198
[00:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted linux-signed [amd64] (trusty-proposed) [3.13.0-143.192]
[00:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted nplan [source] (artful-proposed) [0.32~17.10.2]
[01:32] <slangasek> nacc_: oh, this was about a steam package that's in the Ubuntu archive even? hrm, reverse-depends didn't show this at all when I did the removal
[01:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected s2tc [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.0+git20151227-2ubuntu1]
[01:38] <nacc_> slangasek: yeah :(
[01:38] <nacc_> slangasek: perhaps because it's a provides, etc?
[01:38] <nacc_> i'm not sure, really
[02:00] <tgm4883> I don't mean to be a pest, but this has been sitting in -proposed for over a week and feature freeze is tomorrow. Is there anything I need to be doing about this? http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/bionic/update_excuses.html#mythtv
[02:01] <mwhudson> tgm4883: things in -proposed before freeze are ok :)
[02:04] <tgm4883> mwhudson: ok good news, thanks
[02:06] <slangasek> tgm4883: well, http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_excuses.html#linphone says that helping to analyze the autopkgtest failures which block glibc would be useful
[02:06] <slangasek> the exercise here is "what else depends on the thing which mythtv depends on, and is blocked for some reason"
[02:08] <jbicha> tgm4883: you need everything on that page that Depends on libvpx to be green (or yellow)
[02:09] <jbicha> "Valid candidate" is good, "Not considered" is bad
[02:45] <tsimonq2> slangasek: Did you get a chance to look at ukui* and ukwm in Bionic NEW? If the UKWM stack is going to get in, we're sort of running low on time, heh
[03:08] <slangasek> tsimonq2: ukwm is just complicated enough that I keep swapping out context and not making any progress on it. :P  Let me see if I can make some headway now
[03:13] <tsimonq2> slangasek: Sure.
[03:14] <slangasek> tsimonq2: good news, critical bug in ukwm debian/copyright ;)
[03:14] <tsimonq2> slangasek: drat
[03:14] <tsimonq2> Of COURSE there is.
[03:15] <slangasek> tsimonq2: 'Files: * License: GPL-2+ or LGPL-2+ or MIT~OldStyle+LegalDisclaimer or Expat or SGI-B-2.0' is incorrect, as this syntax claims that the work can be distributed under any of these licenses
[03:15] <slangasek> it can't, the aggregate license is GPL-2+
[03:15] <slangasek> s/aggregate/effective/
[03:16] <tsimonq2> So that should just be GPL-2+?
[03:18] <slangasek> tsimonq2: I think the terms of the SGI-B-2.0 and Expat licenses also must be reproduced verbatim; best to do that by listing separate Files: stanzas for each license
[03:20] <tsimonq2> slangasek: s2tc and steam> Someone just told me via PM that apparently the dep chain wasn't followed far enough. libgl1-mesa-dri recommends libtxc-dxtn-s2tc | libtxc-dxtn-s2tc0 | libtxc-dxtn0 and none of those are present in the archive now.
[03:20] <tsimonq2> slangasek: ukwm> Sure.
[03:21] <slangasek> tsimonq2: "recommends", not "depends".  Also the next mesa drops this recommends.
[03:21] <slangasek> the mesa recommends was seen and discussed before removing s2tc
[03:21] <tsimonq2> slangasek: next mesa drops this recommends> Are you sure about that? I don't think it does.
[03:21] <tsimonq2> Hm.
[03:22] <slangasek> tsimonq2: no, I'm not sure about it, I'm just a messenger
[03:22] <tsimonq2> slangasek: OK ;)
[03:23] <slangasek> tsimonq2: (and a poor one)
[03:23] <slangasek> tsimonq2: what was actually said, as of yesterday, is that the Recommends has been dropped in git
[03:24] <tsimonq2> slangasek: So could that be uploaded please? :)
[03:24] <tsimonq2> (E: not in ~core-dev)
[03:24] <slangasek> tsimonq2: by tjaalton perhaps.  But also, I believe we want the one currently in -proposed to migrate ASAP
[03:25] <tsimonq2> slangasek: Sure.
[03:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected ukwm [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.1.6-0ubuntu1]
[03:28] <tsimonq2> slangasek: I'll work on ukwm (and latte-dock, for that matter), but what about the rest of the ukui* packages?
[04:26] <tsimonq2> slangasek: latte-dock uploaded
[05:53] <tsimonq2> Laney: Hi! I'd like to use the minimal install option in Lubuntu, but I noticed that it's sort of dependent on the usage of a desktop.minimal-remove. In Lubuntu, our seeds are sort of split in two, into desktop-qt and desktop-gtk; will this naming scheme still work when adding this to the seed, or will the recently merged tooling for this need to be changed?
[05:54] <tsimonq2> (So e.g. desktop-qt.minimal-remove and desktop-gtk.minimal-remove.)
[05:55] <tsimonq2> Also, I think we'll need a new ISO QA test for the minimal option should it be enabled in a particular image.
[05:55] <tsimonq2> I can take care of that, as soon as Lubuntu can use it. ;)
[06:09] <tsimonq2> slangasek: No update on qtbase it seems, tests are still running... I'll take a look tomorrow
[06:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop amd64 [Xenial 16.04.4] has been marked as ready
[06:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop i386 [Xenial 16.04.4] has been marked as ready
[06:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: php7.1 [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [7.1.13-1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[06:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: php7.1 [s390x] (bionic-proposed/main) [7.1.13-1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[06:42] <slangasek> xnox: there are some autopkgtests now failing because of the libcurl3 vs libcurl4 conflicts, so I'm starting the uploads now
[06:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: php7.1 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [7.1.13-1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[06:56] <slangasek> hmm how was no one screaming about cmake being uninstallable in -proposed for the past 24+h?
[07:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: php7.1 [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [7.1.13-1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[07:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: php7.1 [armhf] (bionic-proposed/main) [7.1.13-1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[07:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: php7.1 [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [7.1.13-1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[07:49] <acheronuk> tsimonq2> slangasek: latte-dock uploaded
[07:50] <acheronuk> tsimonq2: ^^^ the queue doesn't agree?
[08:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ksmtp [source] (bionic-proposed) [17.12.2-0ubuntu1]
[08:57] <LocutusOfBorg> slangasek, I got a bug report about cmake being uninstallable
[08:57] <LocutusOfBorg> and I closed it :)
[09:03] <Laney> tsimonq2: check the code in livecd-rootfs for how it finds that file
[09:04] <Laney> you probably just want to fix/change live-build/auto/config:670
[09:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kmime [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [17.12.2-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[09:06] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kmime [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [17.12.2-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[09:21] <tkamppeter> Hi, I want to sync cups-filters 1.20.1-1 from Debian and I get "syncpackage: Error: Debian version 1.20.1-1 has not been picked up by LP yet. Please try again later." now already for 2 days. What is happening and what should I do?
[09:21] <Laney> don't remove anything that's a dependency though or you'll have quite a bad time
[09:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kmime [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [17.12.2-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[09:24] <ginggs> tkamppeter: importer not importing
[09:26] <ginggs> tkamppeter: c.j.watson is aware of it
[09:29] <tkamppeter> ginggs, how long will it take to get fixed?
[09:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kmime [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [17.12.2-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[09:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kmime [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [17.12.2-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[09:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kmime [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [17.12.2-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[09:31] <ginggs> tkamppeter: no idea - progress might be reported in #launchpad
[09:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kmime [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [17.12.2-0ubuntu1]
[09:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kmime [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [17.12.2-0ubuntu1]
[09:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kmime [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [17.12.2-0ubuntu1]
[09:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kmime [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [17.12.2-0ubuntu1]
[09:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kmime [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [17.12.2-0ubuntu1]
[09:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kmime [i386] (bionic-proposed) [17.12.2-0ubuntu1]
[09:41] <cjwatson> tkamppeter: we're working on it right now, almost done
[09:41] <cjwatson> tkamppeter: you won't need to sync it manually - auto-sync will pick it up once it's fixed
[09:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Xenial 16.04.4] has been marked as ready
[09:54] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop i386 [Xenial 16.04.4] has been marked as ready
[09:54] <jamespage> ok so I think i got this right - https://code.launchpad.net/~james-page/britney/openvswitch-2.9.0-0ubuntu1/+merge/340081
[09:54] <jamespage> if a release team member could review +1 thanks!
[10:02]  * apw has a look
[10:05] <xnox> slangasek, i was hoping to catch curl4 & ruby2.5-as-default in the archive rebuild, instead of manual builds.
[10:05] <xnox> slangasek, but i guess you want to autopkgtest the hell out of bionic
[10:06] <tkamppeter> cjwatson, it is working now. Thanks. cups-filters is synced now.
[10:08] <cjwatson> tkamppeter: oh, you couldn't wait for auto-sync?  OK.
[10:11] <cjwatson> the importer looks sufficiently finished now, so running auto-sync (it'd run in an hour anyway, but we'll want to allow as much catch-up time as possible)
[10:15] <jamespage> apw: ta
[10:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kcalcore [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:17.12.2-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[10:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kcalcore [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:17.12.2-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[10:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kcalcore [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:17.12.2-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[10:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kcalcore [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:17.12.2-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[10:22] <cjwatson> auto-sync done
[10:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ksmtp [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [17.12.2-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[10:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kcalcore [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:17.12.2-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[10:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: eiskaltdcpp [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.2.10+186+g1c0173ec-2] (no packageset)
[10:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kcalcore [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:17.12.2-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[10:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qpdf [s390x] (bionic-proposed/main) [8.0.0-1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[10:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qpdf [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [8.0.0-1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[10:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qpdf [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [8.0.0-1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[10:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ksmtp [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [17.12.2-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[10:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ksmtp [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [17.12.2-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[10:41] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ksmtp [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [17.12.2-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[10:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qpdf [arm64] (bionic-proposed/main) [8.0.0-1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[10:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ksmtp [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [17.12.2-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[10:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libgwenhywfar [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.20.0-1] (kubuntu)
[10:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: ksmtp [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [17.12.2-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[10:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lcgdm [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.10.0-2] (no packageset)
[10:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qpdf [i386] (bionic-proposed/main) [8.0.0-1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[10:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qpdf [armhf] (bionic-proposed/main) [8.0.0-1] (desktop-core, ubuntu-server)
[10:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kronosnet [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.1-1] (no packageset)
[10:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: eiskaltdcpp [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.2.10+186+g1c0173ec-2] (no packageset)
[10:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libgwenhywfar [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.20.0-1] (kubuntu)
[10:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libgwenhywfar [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.20.0-1] (kubuntu)
[10:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-google-auth [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.3.0-2] (no packageset)
[10:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: eiskaltdcpp [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.2.10+186+g1c0173ec-2] (no packageset)
[10:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lcgdm [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.10.0-2] (no packageset)
[10:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: eiskaltdcpp [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.2.10+186+g1c0173ec-2] (no packageset)
[10:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lcgdm [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.10.0-2] (no packageset)
[10:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lcgdm [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.10.0-2] (no packageset)
[10:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-pluggy [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.6.0-1] (no packageset)
[10:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: irtt [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.9.0-2] (no packageset)
[11:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libgwenhywfar [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.20.0-1] (kubuntu)
[11:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: core-specs-alpha-clojure [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.1.24-1] (no packageset)
[11:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-dcso-fluxline [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.0~git20180222.25ae683-1] (no packageset)
[11:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-armon-go-socks5 [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.0~git20160902.e753329-1] (no packageset)
[11:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-go-debos-fakemachine [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.0~git20180126.e307c2f-1] (no packageset)
[11:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-go-debos-fakemachine [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.0~git20180126.e307c2f-1] (no packageset)
[11:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: irtt [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.9.0-2] (no packageset)
[11:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-safchain-ethtool [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.0~git20170622.7ff1ba2-1] (no packageset)
[11:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libtest-postgresql-perl [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.23-2] (no packageset)
[11:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: smalr [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.1-1] (no packageset)
[11:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-valyala-fasthttp [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [20160617-1] (no packageset)
[11:04] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: trac-wikiprint [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.0.0+r16816-1] (no packageset)
[11:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-cloudflare [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.0.4-1] (no packageset)
[11:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: intel-ipsec-mb [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.48-1] (no packageset)
[11:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: irtt [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.9.0-2] (no packageset)
[11:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: irtt [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.9.0-2] (no packageset)
[11:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qgis [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.18.17+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[11:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: anosql [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.2.0-1] (no packageset)
[11:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: pipsi [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.9-1] (no packageset)
[11:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: apertium-crh-tur [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.3.0~r83159-1] (no packageset)
[11:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: apertium-ukr [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.1.0~r82563-1] (no packageset)
[11:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: proxmoxer [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.2-1] (no packageset)
[11:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libgwenhywfar [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.20.0-1] (kubuntu)
[11:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: eiskaltdcpp [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.2.10+186+g1c0173ec-2] (no packageset)
[11:27] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libgwenhywfar [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4.20.0-1] (kubuntu)
[11:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: eiskaltdcpp [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.2.10+186+g1c0173ec-2] (no packageset)
[11:29] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libmstoolkit [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [82-2] (no packageset)
[11:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qgis [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.18.17+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[11:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libmstoolkit [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [82-2] (no packageset)
[11:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libmstoolkit [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [82-2] (no packageset)
[11:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: polymake [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.2r2-2] (no packageset)
[11:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lcgdm [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.10.0-2] (no packageset)
[11:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: fonts-ubuntu (bionic-proposed/primary) [0.83-1]
[11:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: lcgdm [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.10.0-2] (no packageset)
[11:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libmstoolkit [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [82-2] (no packageset)
[11:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: polymake [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.2r2-2] (no packageset)
[11:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qgis [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.18.17+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[11:50] <jbicha> fonts-ubuntu ^ will need special handling. It should go in main (it's the new name for ubuntu-font-family-sources). And the transitional pkgs should go to oldlibs
[11:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: polymake [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.2r2-2] (no packageset)
[11:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted anosql [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [0.2.0-1]
[11:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted apertium-ukr [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [0.1.0~r82563-1]
[11:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted eiskaltdcpp [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [2.2.10+186+g1c0173ec-2]
[11:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted eiskaltdcpp [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [2.2.10+186+g1c0173ec-2]
[11:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted eiskaltdcpp [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [2.2.10+186+g1c0173ec-2]
[11:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-armon-go-socks5 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [0.0~git20160902.e753329-1]
[11:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: php7.1 [s390x] (bionic-proposed/main) [7.1.13-1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[11:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: rax-nova-agent (bionic-proposed/primary) [2.1.12-0ubuntu1]
[11:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted apertium-crh-tur [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [0.3.0~r83159-1]
[11:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted eiskaltdcpp [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [2.2.10+186+g1c0173ec-2]
[11:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted eiskaltdcpp [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [2.2.10+186+g1c0173ec-2]
[11:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: pyxs (bionic-proposed/primary) [0.4.1+dfsg1-0ubuntu1]
[11:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted core-specs-alpha-clojure [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [0.1.24-1]
[11:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: php7.1 [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/main) [7.1.13-1] (kubuntu, ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[11:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted eiskaltdcpp [i386] (bionic-proposed) [2.2.10+186+g1c0173ec-2]
[11:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-dcso-fluxline [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [0.0~git20180222.25ae683-1]
[11:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-go-debos-fakemachine [i386] (bionic-proposed) [0.0~git20180126.e307c2f-1]
[11:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-valyala-fasthttp [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [20160617-1]
[11:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kronosnet [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [1.1-1]
[11:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lcgdm [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [1.10.0-2]
[11:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lcgdm [i386] (bionic-proposed) [1.10.0-2]
[11:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lcgdm [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [1.10.0-2]
[11:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libgwenhywfar [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [4.20.0-1]
[11:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libgwenhywfar [i386] (bionic-proposed) [4.20.0-1]
[11:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libgwenhywfar [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [4.20.0-1]
[11:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-go-debos-fakemachine [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [0.0~git20180126.e307c2f-1]
[11:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted intel-ipsec-mb [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [0.48-1]
[11:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lcgdm [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [1.10.0-2]
[11:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libgwenhywfar [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4.20.0-1]
[11:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libgwenhywfar [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [4.20.0-1]
[11:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: ippsample (bionic-proposed/primary) [0.0+20180213-0ubuntu1]
[11:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: ukui-settings-daemon (bionic-proposed/primary) [1.1.5-0ubuntu1]
[11:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-safchain-ethtool [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [0.0~git20170622.7ff1ba2-1]
[11:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lcgdm [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [1.10.0-2]
[11:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: dptfxtract (bionic-proposed/primary) [1.2-0ubuntu1]
[11:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted lcgdm [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [1.10.0-2]
[11:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: ukui-media (bionic-proposed/primary) [1.1.1-0ubuntu1]
[11:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libgwenhywfar [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [4.20.0-1]
[11:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libtest-postgresql-perl [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [1.23-2]
[11:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted proxmoxer [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.2-1]
[11:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-google-auth [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [1.3.0-2]
[11:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pipsi [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [0.9-1]
[11:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-pluggy [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [0.6.0-1]
[11:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted python-cloudflare [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [2.0.4-1]
[11:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qpdf [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [8.0.0-1]
[11:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qpdf [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [8.0.0-1]
[11:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qpdf [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [8.0.0-1]
[11:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qpdf [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [8.0.0-1]
[11:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qpdf [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [8.0.0-1]
[11:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted qpdf [i386] (bionic-proposed) [8.0.0-1]
[11:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted smalr [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [1.0.1-1]
[11:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted trac-wikiprint [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [2.0.0+r16816-1]
[11:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted php7.1 [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [7.1.13-1]
[11:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted php7.1 [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [7.1.13-1]
[11:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted php7.1 [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [7.1.13-1]
[11:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libmstoolkit [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [82-2.1~build1] (no packageset)
[11:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted php7.1 [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [7.1.13-1]
[11:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted php7.1 [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [7.1.13-1]
[11:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted php7.1 [i386] (bionic-proposed) [7.1.13-1]
[12:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libmstoolkit [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [82-2.1~build1] (no packageset)
[12:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libmstoolkit [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [82-2.1~build1] (no packageset)
[12:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libmstoolkit [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [82-2.1~build1] (no packageset)
[12:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: golang-github-go-debos-fakemachine [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.0~git20180126.e307c2f-1] (no packageset)
[12:10] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: irtt [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.9.0-2] (no packageset)
[12:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: irtt [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.9.0-2] (no packageset)
[12:22] <xnox> nacc_, slangasek - is it an autosync mistake that php7.1 is back in bionic?
[12:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted golang-github-go-debos-fakemachine [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [0.0~git20180126.e307c2f-1]
[12:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted irtt [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [0.9.0-2]
[12:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted irtt [i386] (bionic-proposed) [0.9.0-2]
[12:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted irtt [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [0.9.0-2]
[12:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted irtt [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [0.9.0-2]
[12:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted irtt [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [0.9.0-2]
[12:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted irtt [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [0.9.0-2]
[12:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: polymake [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.2r2-2] (no packageset)
[12:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qgis [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.18.17+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[12:58] <LocutusOfBorg> can anybody please accept libmstoolkit? it is now built everywhere, and will unblock comet-ms
[12:59] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libmstoolkit [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [82-2.1~build1] (no packageset)
[13:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ksmtp [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [17.12.2-0ubuntu1]
[13:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ksmtp [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [17.12.2-0ubuntu1]
[13:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ksmtp [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [17.12.2-0ubuntu1]
[13:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libmstoolkit [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [82-2]
[13:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libmstoolkit [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [82-2]
[13:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libmstoolkit [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [82-2.1~build1] (no packageset)
[13:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ksmtp [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [17.12.2-0ubuntu1]
[13:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ksmtp [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [17.12.2-0ubuntu1]
[13:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libmstoolkit [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [82-2]
[13:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted ksmtp [i386] (bionic-proposed) [17.12.2-0ubuntu1]
[13:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libmstoolkit [i386] (bionic-proposed) [82-2]
[13:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libmstoolkit [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [82-2.1~build1]
[13:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libmstoolkit [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [82-2.1~build1]
[13:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libmstoolkit [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [82-2.1~build1]
[13:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libmstoolkit [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [82-2.1~build1]
[13:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libmstoolkit [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [82-2.1~build1]
[13:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libmstoolkit [i386] (bionic-proposed) [82-2.1~build1]
[13:11] <smb> apw, because of my iproute2 upload I was watching its ADT progress. Beside of heartbeat which seems to be a slightly unreliable test, I also see virtualbox (the dkms drivers) showing up as regressions. But those are clearly the "kernel already got the same version" problem. Is there a way that this could be made expected failure on the Britney side?
[13:11] <apw> smb, we actually already fixed those so this would never happen (in the normal case) where these are in ubuntu, but they have just pulled one of the drivers into the kernel staging
[13:12] <apw> smb, and actually it does not have the same version, it has no version, so it should not be the same, i am debugging dkms atm
[13:12] <apw> smb, and i have hinted that version
[13:12] <smb> apw, ah ok. did not know
[13:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qgis [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.18.17+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[13:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: debos [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.0+git20180112.6e577d4-1] (no packageset)
[13:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: debos [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.0+git20180112.6e577d4-1] (no packageset)
[13:42] <tsimonq2> Laney, xnox: One of the recent ubiquity uploads regressed, Kubuntu is facing a Ubiquity bug affecting Bionic, bug 1752323...
[13:42] <ubot5`> bug 1752323 in ubiquity (Ubuntu) "Ubiquity crashes at startup on Kubuntu daily iso - 2018/02/28" [Critical,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1752323
[13:48] <acheronuk> ubiquity 18.04.2 regresses it. if I force downgrade to 18.04.1, it works
[13:48] <acheronuk> tsimonq2: ^
[13:49] <acheronuk> so we have the ultimate minimal install right now. zero - nothing!
[13:50] <tsimonq2> Laney: So then it's somewhat related to the changes made when adding the minimal mode.
[13:58] <coreycb> hi, can someone from the release team help get percona-xtradb-cluster-5.7 accepted from the NEW queue? we're moving to 5.7 for OpenStack in Bionic.
[14:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: qgis [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.18.17+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[14:02] <coreycb> or perhaps an archive admin :) ^
[14:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debian-installer (xenial-proposed/main) [20101020ubuntu451.22 => 20101020ubuntu451.23] (core)
[14:09] <xnox> sil2100, haha, i also uploaded d-i
[14:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: debian-installer (xenial-proposed/main) [20101020ubuntu451.22 => 20101020ubuntu451.23] (core)
[14:10] <xnox> as well.
[14:13] <xnox> accepting either is fine; i did push mine in bzr.
[14:13] <xnox> but that can be fixed if you accept your own.
[14:14] <Laney> tsimonq2: Can you debug please?
[14:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected debian-installer [source] (xenial-proposed) [20101020ubuntu451.23]
[14:15] <tsimonq2> Laney: acheronuk got somewhere, share your notes?
[14:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted debian-installer [source] (xenial-proposed) [20101020ubuntu451.23]
[14:16] <acheronuk> I got nowhere really.
[14:16] <tsimonq2> Alright then, I can debug
[14:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libvirt [source] (xenial-proposed) [1.3.1-1ubuntu10.20]
[14:17] <Laney> merci
[14:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libvirt [source] (artful-proposed) [3.6.0-1ubuntu6.4]
[14:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: polymake [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.2r2-2] (no packageset)
[14:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted qemu [source] (xenial-proposed) [1:2.5+dfsg-5ubuntu10.23]
[14:55] <Laney> tsimonq2: do you have a /var/log/installer/debug file?
[14:55] <tsimonq2> Laney: No, but I can grab an ISO and get you one if you'd like
[14:55]  * tsimonq2 didn't report the bug
[14:56] <Laney> ok, I thought you would be there since you said you were debugging
[14:56] <tsimonq2> I'm getting to it, people keep throwing things at me ;)
[15:01] <acheronuk> Laney: https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/sBQVpsK3ff/
[15:01] <acheronuk> hope that is what you meant
[15:03] <Laney> yeah
[15:03] <Laney> Could not create prepare page: 'QWidget' object has no attribute 'minimal_install_vbox'
[15:03] <Laney> I know what's happening I think :-)
[15:30] <acheronuk> Laney: have you built that branch anywhere? I can just try allying the changes in situ if not
[15:30] <acheronuk> *applying
[15:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot amd64 [Xenial 16.04.4] has been updated (20101020ubuntu451.23)
[15:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot arm64 [Xenial 16.04.4] has been updated (20101020ubuntu451.23)
[15:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot armhf [Xenial 16.04.4] has been updated (20101020ubuntu451.23)
[15:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot i386 [Xenial 16.04.4] has been updated (20101020ubuntu451.23)
[15:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot powerpc [Xenial 16.04.4] has been updated (20101020ubuntu451.23)
[15:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot ppc64el [Xenial 16.04.4] has been updated (20101020ubuntu451.23)
[15:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Netboot s390x [Xenial 16.04.4] has been updated (20101020ubuntu451.23)
[15:31] <tsimonq2> Laney: Would it collide with Feature Freeze if I decided to wait on that livecd-rootfs fix until this weekend (pre Beta 1 ISOs)?
[15:32] <tsimonq2> (Meaning, would it need an FFE?)
[15:32] <Laney> tsimonq2: I wouldn't worry about it if it only affects your flavour
[15:33] <Laney> acheronuk: if you trust some random guy's debs you can have mine
[15:33] <tsimonq2> Laney: OK.
[15:33] <Laney> (soon)
[15:34] <acheronuk> random. right
[15:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: debos [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.0.0+git20180112.6e577d4-1] (no packageset)
[15:35] <Laney> don't look at the postinst O:)
[15:45] <nacc_> xnox: i assume so? it probably needs adding to the blacklist
[15:47] <Laney> acheronuk: https://people.canonical.com/~laney/lp1752323/
[15:47] <Laney> let's move to #ubuntu-installer for this please
[15:58] <elopio> sorry for the late reply RAOF. Sergio has commented about artful on the bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapcraft/+bug/1745488/comments/9
[15:58] <ubot5`> Ubuntu bug 1745488 in snapcraft (Ubuntu Artful) "[SRU] New stable micro release 2.39.2" [Undecided,Confirmed]
[16:07] <slangasek> xnox: no, we want to get the transitions out of the way /before/ the archive rebuild when migratability resets
[16:08] <slangasek> xnox: php7.1 back in bionic - I did not blacklist this package for syncing, that wasn't part of the request in the bug
[16:08] <nacc> slangasek: my fault
[16:09] <slangasek> nacc: but I should remove it again, right?
[16:10] <nacc> slangasek: yes please
[16:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: falkon (bionic-proposed/primary) [3.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[16:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted falkon [source] (bionic-proposed) [3.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[16:22] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kio-gdrive [source] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.1-0ubuntu1]
[16:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kcalcore [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4:17.12.2-0ubuntu1]
[16:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kcalcore [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [4:17.12.2-0ubuntu1]
[16:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kcalcore [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [4:17.12.2-0ubuntu1]
[16:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kcalcore [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [4:17.12.2-0ubuntu1]
[16:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kcalcore [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [4:17.12.2-0ubuntu1]
[16:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kcalcore [i386] (bionic-proposed) [4:17.12.2-0ubuntu1]
[16:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: falkon [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [3.0.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[16:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: falkon [i386] (bionic-proposed/none) [3.0.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[16:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kio-gdrive [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [1.2.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[16:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kio-gdrive [i386] (bionic-proposed/none) [1.2.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[16:26] <tsimonq2> yay @ Riddell doing some AA reviews for Kubuntu :)
[16:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kio-gdrive [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.2.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[16:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: latte-dock (bionic-proposed/primary) [0.7.3-0ubuntu1]
[16:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kio-gdrive [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.2.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[16:42] <sil2100> flexiondotorg: poke poke, looking for ubuntu-mate testers o/
[16:42] <sil2100> flexiondotorg: could you poke around to get the .4 images tested?
[16:42] <tsimonq2> Oh, speaking of that, let's see how far along Lubuntu is...
[16:42] <sil2100> Lubuntu's doing pretty good I guess
[16:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop amd64 [Xenial 16.04.4] has been marked as ready
[16:44] <tsimonq2> The rest of the Lubuntu testing should be pretty easy
[16:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: falkon [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.0.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[16:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: falkon [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.0.0-0ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[16:50] <elopio> arges: rbasak: can you help us with the release of snapcraft 2.39.2? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/snapcraft/+bug/1745488
[16:50] <ubot5`> Ubuntu bug 1745488 in snapcraft (Ubuntu Artful) "[SRU] New stable micro release 2.39.2" [Undecided,Confirmed]
[16:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kio-gdrive [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.1-0ubuntu1]
[16:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kio-gdrive [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.1-0ubuntu1]
[16:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kio-gdrive [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.1-0ubuntu1]
[16:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kio-gdrive [i386] (bionic-proposed) [1.2.1-0ubuntu1]
[16:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected falkon [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [3.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[16:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected falkon [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [3.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[16:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected falkon [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [3.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[16:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: rejected falkon [i386] (bionic-proposed) [3.0.0-0ubuntu1]
[17:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: polymake [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.2r2-2] (no packageset)
[17:09] <sil2100>  flexiondotorg: ok, nvm the testing request, I'll be re-spinnning the images anyway
[17:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: leatherman [s390x] (bionic-proposed/none) [1.4.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[17:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: falkon [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.0.0-0ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[17:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: leatherman [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/none) [1.4.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[17:15] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: python-funcsigs [amd64] (bionic-proposed/main) [1.0.2-4] (ubuntu-server)
[17:15] <blackboxsw> RAOF  you processing the cloud-init pending-sru for xenial/artful. rmadison says artful updates has the latest 17.2.35 but xenial-updates not quite yet. Though the bug says publishing is done
[17:15] <blackboxsw> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-init/+bug/1747059
[17:15] <ubot5`> Ubuntu bug 1747059 in cloud-init (Ubuntu Xenial) "sru cloud-init (17.1.46-g7acc9e86-0ubuntu1) update to 17.2-35-gf576b2a2-0ubuntu1~16.04.1" [Medium,Fix committed]
[17:16] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fonts-ubuntu [sync] (bionic-proposed) [0.83-1]
[17:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: leatherman [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.4.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[17:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fonts-ubuntu [amd64] (bionic-proposed/none) [0.83-1] (no packageset)
[17:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: puredata [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.48.1-3] (ubuntustudio)
[17:18] <blackboxsw> it's definitely not an ideal time to talk to RAOF, rbasak  if you have a chance today can you peek at cloud-init xenial SRU status? artful looks in
[17:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: falkon [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.0.0-0ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[17:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: leatherman [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.4.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: falkon [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.0.0-0ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[17:28] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: fonts-monoid [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.61-1] (no packageset)
[17:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kalarmcal [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:17.12.2-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[17:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kcalutils [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:17.12.2-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[17:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: leatherman [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.4.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[17:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kalarmcal [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:17.12.2-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[17:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kcalutils [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:17.12.2-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[17:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kalarmcal [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:17.12.2-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[17:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kcalutils [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:17.12.2-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[17:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kcalutils [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:17.12.2-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[17:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: falkon [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [3.0.0-0ubuntu2] (no packageset)
[17:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: leatherman [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [1.4.0+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[17:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kalarmcal [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:17.12.2-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[17:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kalarmcal [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:17.12.2-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[17:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kalarmcal [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:17.12.2-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[17:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kalarmcal [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4:17.12.2-0ubuntu1]
[17:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kalarmcal [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [4:17.12.2-0ubuntu1]
[17:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kalarmcal [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [4:17.12.2-0ubuntu1]
[17:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kcalutils [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4:17.12.2-0ubuntu1]
[17:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kcalutils [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [4:17.12.2-0ubuntu1]
[17:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kcalutils [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:17.12.2-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[17:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kalarmcal [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [4:17.12.2-0ubuntu1]
[17:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kalarmcal [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [4:17.12.2-0ubuntu1]
[17:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kcalutils [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [4:17.12.2-0ubuntu1]
[17:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kalarmcal [i386] (bionic-proposed) [4:17.12.2-0ubuntu1]
[17:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kcalutils [i386] (bionic-proposed) [4:17.12.2-0ubuntu1]
[17:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted falkon [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [3.0.0-0ubuntu2]
[17:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted falkon [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [3.0.0-0ubuntu2]
[17:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted falkon [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [3.0.0-0ubuntu2]
[17:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted falkon [i386] (bionic-proposed) [3.0.0-0ubuntu2]
[17:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kcalutils [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [4:17.12.2-0ubuntu1]
[17:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted fonts-ubuntu [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [0.83-1]
[17:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: kcalutils [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:17.12.2-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[17:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: akonadi-calendar [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:17.12.2-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[17:50] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libkf5libkdepim [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:17.12.2-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[17:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: akonadi-calendar [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:17.12.2-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[17:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libkf5libkdepim [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:17.12.2-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[17:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: akonadi-calendar [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:17.12.2-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[17:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: akonadi-calendar [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:17.12.2-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[17:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libkf5libkdepim [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:17.12.2-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[17:56] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libkf5libkdepim [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:17.12.2-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[18:01] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libkf5libkdepim [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:17.12.2-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[18:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: akonadi-calendar [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:17.12.2-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[18:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: libkf5libkdepim [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [4:17.12.2-0ubuntu1] (kubuntu)
[18:09] <Laney> I just phat phingered something on the autopkgtest lxd machines and it made a bunch of jobs falsely fail
[18:09] <Laney> sozzles, will try to put them back in the queue
[18:21] <Laney> done I think, but if you see anything failed with a weird error about a remote not existing that's not requeued then please click the nice big button
[18:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Mythbuntu Desktop amd64 [Xenial 16.04.4] has been updated (20180228)
[18:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Mythbuntu Desktop i386 [Xenial 16.04.4] has been updated (20180228)
[18:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server amd64 [Xenial 16.04.4] has been updated (20180228)
[18:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server arm64 [Xenial 16.04.4] has been updated (20180228)
[18:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server i386 [Xenial 16.04.4] has been updated (20180228)
[18:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server powerpc [Xenial 16.04.4] has been updated (20180228)
[18:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server ppc64el [Xenial 16.04.4] has been updated (20180228)
[18:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server s390x [Xenial 16.04.4] has been updated (20180228)
[18:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop amd64 [Xenial 16.04.4] has been updated (20180228)
[18:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop i386 [Xenial 16.04.4] has been updated (20180228)
[18:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop amd64 [Xenial 16.04.4] has been updated (20180228)
[18:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu MATE Desktop i386 [Xenial 16.04.4] has been updated (20180228)
[18:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop amd64 [Xenial 16.04.4] has been updated (20180228)
[18:57] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Kubuntu Desktop i386 [Xenial 16.04.4] has been updated (20180228)
[19:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop amd64 [Xenial 16.04.4] has been updated (20180228)
[19:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Kylin Desktop i386 [Xenial 16.04.4] has been updated (20180228)
[19:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD amd64 [Xenial 16.04.4] has been updated (20180228)
[19:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Studio DVD i386 [Xenial 16.04.4] has been updated (20180228)
[19:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Server armhf+raspi2 [Xenial 16.04.4] has been updated (20180228)
[19:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop amd64 [Xenial 16.04.4] has been updated (20180228)
[19:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop amd64 [Xenial 16.04.4] has been updated (20180228)
[19:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Desktop i386 [Xenial 16.04.4] has been updated (20180228)
[19:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Lubuntu Desktop i386 [Xenial 16.04.4] has been updated (20180228)
[19:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu GNOME Desktop amd64 [Xenial 16.04.4] has been updated (20180228)
[19:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu GNOME Desktop i386 [Xenial 16.04.4] has been updated (20180228)
[19:20] <tsimonq2> Why the respin?
[19:21] <tsimonq2> :/
[19:25] <nacc> tsimonq2: https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-release/2018-February/004301.html
[19:35] <sil2100> tsimonq2: ...don't ask
[19:35] <sil2100> ;)
[19:43] <flocculant> sil2100: why the respin :D
[19:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base amd64 [Xenial 16.04.4] has been updated (20180228)
[19:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base arm64 [Xenial 16.04.4] has been updated (20180228)
[19:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base armhf [Xenial 16.04.4] has been updated (20180228)
[19:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base i386 [Xenial 16.04.4] has been updated (20180228)
[19:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base powerpc [Xenial 16.04.4] has been updated (20180228)
[19:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base ppc64el [Xenial 16.04.4] has been updated (20180228)
[19:43] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Ubuntu Base s390x [Xenial 16.04.4] has been updated (20180228)
[20:01] <jbicha> slangasek: please promote fonts-ubuntu to main, and move the binaries ttf-ubuntu-font-family and fonts-ubuntu-font-family-console to oldlibs
[20:14] <slangasek> jbicha: uh is this related to the debootstrap failures I *just* saw in autopkgtest logs? http://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/p/pbuilder/bionic/ppc64el
[20:15] <slangasek> jbicha: do you know why fonts-ubuntu source is in multiverse?
[20:15] <jbicha> slangasek: oops, missing Breaks/Replaces indeed. How do you want me to fix this
[20:16] <jbicha> yes, Debian considers it to be non-free. Ubuntu disagrees
[20:16] <slangasek> jbicha: hmm, add them? :)
[20:16] <jbicha> sorry, I was overthinking, uploading in a minute…
[20:17] <slangasek> it's a bit strange to have the Ubuntu fonts packages maintained via Debian sync, though.  I wonder if we should blacklist
[20:17] <slangasek> the package rename to be consistent with font naming policy makes sense
[20:19] <slangasek> "the Debian project considers" it to be non-free, that's interesting, I wonder where that discussion happened
[20:20] <slangasek> jbicha: oh, but you're the maintainer, so that's a bit better than some random DD being the "upstream" for our fonts :)
[20:20] <jbicha> yes
[20:20] <jbicha> the license issue was a big reason why it took 7 years to finally reach Debian (non-free)
[20:20] <jbicha> https://salsa.debian.org/fonts-team/fonts-ubuntu/blob/debian/unstable/debian/copyright
[20:21] <jbicha> Debian bug 603157
[20:21] <ubot5`> Debian bug 603157 in wnpp "ITP: fonts-ubuntu -- sans-serif font set from Ubuntu" [Wishlist,Fixed] http://bugs.debian.org/603157
[20:22] <tsimonq2> slangasek: There WAS an Ubuntu Developers team in Aliothh...
[20:22] <tsimonq2> I'm pondering reserving the namespace iin Salsaf it hasn't been allready
[20:22] <tsimonq2> (grr mobile keyboard)
[20:23] <jbicha> the Ubuntu Font License was supposed to be a temporary license so maybe it's time to reconsider what license is used, but that's not my job ;)
[20:24] <slangasek> jbicha: is fonts-ubuntu's Ubuntu*.ttf glob equivalent to ttf-ubuntu-font-family's Ubuntu-[LRMBC]*.ttf + UbuntuMono-*.ttf, or does the new package pull in more fonts?
[20:24] <slangasek> jbicha: the new source also appears to drop debian/ttf-ubuntu-font-family.maintscript which seems to still be relevant on upgrades to bionic
[20:26] <jbicha> the package should not be including any additional fonts
[20:26] <jbicha> the maintscript should be obsolete since the package hasn't been modified since xenial
[20:28] <slangasek> jbicha: ah, sure enough - I had failed to check that
[20:28] <sergiusens> slangasek: while you are here, is there any chance we can get snapcraft into xenial-updates today?
[20:30] <slangasek> sergiusens: is the SRU vanguard unavailable?
[20:30] <slangasek> I'm in the middle of these overrides for jbicha
[20:31] <sergiusens> slangasek: no worries, sorry for not checking (I usually check) while it is outside sil2100's timezone, I guess bdmurray could look into it
[20:32] <tsimonq2> slangasek: There, added the vorlon user to ubuntu-dev-teeam, we can mifgrate things over frlom Alioth eventtually I guess
[20:33] <tsimonq2> (this HAS to be connectbot... wtf)
[20:33] <tsimonq2> slangasek: It also might be for the sake of reserving the namespace
[20:34] <tsimonq2> ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
[20:34] <sil2100> What's up?
[20:34] <sil2100> I'm available, but doing testing generally
[20:35] <sil2100> sergiusens: since snapcraft is universe and not seeded, I can publish it in a bit, sure
[20:38] <sergiusens> sil2100: thanks! I wasn't aware you were still around
[20:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop amd64 [Xenial 16.04.4] has been marked as ready
[20:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Builds: Xubuntu Desktop i386 [Xenial 16.04.4] has been marked as ready
[20:42] <mwhudson> hi can docker-libkv/0.2.1-1 be hinted as a bad test? it's broked in release too
[20:43] <mwhudson> oh wait what i just did didn't prove that
[20:43] <mwhudson> (but i'm pretty sure it's broken anyway)
[20:44] <manjo> sil2100, the download information link from http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/386/builds/167237/testcases is broken
[20:44] <manjo> sil2100, hereis the broken link http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/milestones/386/builds/167237/downloads
[20:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: friendly-recovery (artful-proposed/main) [0.2.36 => 0.2.36ubuntu1] (core)
[20:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: friendly-recovery (xenial-proposed/main) [0.2.31 => 0.2.31ubuntu1] (core)
[20:50] <sil2100> manjo: is is a regression? Or was it always broken? I'll fix that, thanks!
[20:50] <manjo> sil2100, not sure .. I just noticed it .. thanks for fixing
[20:50] <manjo> sil2100, last time I noticed ARM64 had similar broken links
[20:51] <sil2100> Yeah, arm64 I fixed
[20:52] <manjo> yes is fixed for arm64 now
[21:20] <slangasek> fonts-ubuntu 0.83-1ubuntu1 now publishing to release
[21:36] <tjaalton> slangasek: fyi, latest mesa should unbreak clutter tests
[21:36] <tjaalton> once the font mess is sorted :)
[21:44] <slangasek> \o/
[21:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: flatpak (artful-proposed/universe) [0.8.7-5 => 0.8.9-0ubuntu0.1] (ubuntugnome)
[21:55] <slangasek> is ruby-all-dev currently broken?  References to ruby2.3 without depending on it? https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/uwsgi/2.0.15-10.2build1/+build/14404152
[21:59] <jbicha> slangasek: looks like fonts-ubuntu has migrated
[22:00] <slangasek> jbicha: yes; I was waiting to confirm I see it in apt output before retriggering tests
[22:00] <slangasek> archive.u.c is being coy
[22:01] <jbicha> rmadison and https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/packages/adduser/bionic/ppc64el says we're good
[22:02] <slangasek> ok cool
[22:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New sync: granite (bionic-proposed/primary) [0.5+ds-1]
[22:12] <mwhudson> slangasek: will you be retrying all failures from the last hour or whatever or just the ones showing on excuses?
[22:13] <slangasek> mwhudson: the retrying is based on excuses, so if you have failures you care about that are *not* listed there, they wouldn't get retried
[22:22] <mwhudson> slangasek: ok
[22:26] <slangasek> uwsgi> not a ruby-defaults problem, just needed uwsgi itself to change package names
[22:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: uwsgi [s390x] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.0.15-10.2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[22:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: uwsgi [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.0.15-10.2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[22:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: python-cliff (artful-proposed/main) [2.8.0-0ubuntu1 => 2.8.0-0ubuntu1.1] (ubuntu-desktop, ubuntu-server)
[22:40] <mwhudson> slangasek: poking at fpc vs glibc while i wait for other things
[22:40] <slangasek> xnox: xmltooling looks unsolvable, xml-security-c requires openssl-1.0 with no upstream solution (https://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-shibboleth-devel/2016-October/004315.html), and it also uses curl_easy_setopt(SSL_CTX)
[22:40] <mwhudson> (i think it might be very silly)
[22:43] <sil2100> sergiusens: done
[22:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: uwsgi [amd64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.0.15-10.2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[22:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: uwsgi [i386] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.0.15-10.2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[22:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: uwsgi [armhf] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.0.15-10.2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[22:56] <mwhudson> huh huh no it's not _completely_ silly
[22:56] <mwhudson> a test that used to segfault now fails to compile
[22:57] <mwhudson> /usr/bin/ld.bfd: output/x86_64-linux/webtbs/chunk000020000webtbs/tw0876: hidden symbol `__dso_handle' isn't defined
[22:57] <mwhudson> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc_nonshared.a(atexit.oS): In function `atexit':
[22:57]  * mwhudson scratches head
[23:00] <sil2100> flexiondotorg: hey! Once you're up, the testing request of .4 ubuntu-mate is valid again
[23:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: uwsgi [arm64] (bionic-proposed/universe) [2.0.15-10.2ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[23:01] <flexiondotorg> sil2100: We're on it. Thanks :-)
[23:03] <sil2100> flexiondotorg: thanks! I'll be picking up the some of the i386 tests to speed things up :)
[23:03] <sil2100> manjo: fixed the link to ppc64el, thanks for noticing it!
[23:05] <mwhudson> pfffffffffffffffff two instances of __dso_handle have changed from WEAK to GLOBAL in libc_nonshared
[23:06] <mwhudson> slangasek: halp
[23:11] <mwhudson> well i guess this explains that: http://paste.ubuntu.com/p/Dp29kBbT9t/
[23:13] <mwhudson> lalala https://sourceware.org/git/?p=glibc.git;a=commit;h=825adeeed1e95990fd1efb70d9ac3eb7f1ea802a i guess somehow should tell fpc about this
[23:13] <mwhudson> *someone
[23:18] <slangasek> mdeslaur: do you want to sanity-check a change I'm considering for xmltooling to un-break it wrt openssl 1.1 transition?
[23:19] <mdeslaur> slangasek: sure
[23:22] <slangasek> mdeslaur: so xmltooling depends on both curl, and xml-security-c; xml-security-c is openssl 1.0 only upstream and not straightforward to port; and it uses the bits of the curl API that are bound to the ABI of the underlying TLS implementation.
[23:22] <slangasek> mdeslaur: but it only uses SSL_CTX in order to override the protocol negotiation - to disable SSLv2 and TLSv2 by default
[23:23] <slangasek> mdeslaur: so if I switched it to use the gnutls build of curl, and continue to build with openssl1.0, and dropped the calls to override protocol flags, it would build
[23:23] <slangasek> mdeslaur: our gnutls is !SSLv2 !SSLv3 by default, right?
[23:24] <slangasek> mdeslaur: and are you comfortable with the idea of patching out this override?
[23:24] <mdeslaur> slangasek: I believe so, yes
[23:24] <mdeslaur> slangasek: yes, it's sounds fine to me
[23:31] <slangasek> mdeslaur: k thanks, I'll put together a patch and run it past the Debian maintainers as well
[23:31] <slangasek> mdeslaur: would you like a cc: also?
[23:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted akonadi-calendar [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4:17.12.2-0ubuntu1]
[23:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted akonadi-calendar [i386] (bionic-proposed) [4:17.12.2-0ubuntu1]
[23:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted akonadi-calendar [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [4:17.12.2-0ubuntu1]
[23:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libkf5libkdepim [amd64] (bionic-proposed) [4:17.12.2-0ubuntu1]
[23:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libkf5libkdepim [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [4:17.12.2-0ubuntu1]
[23:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libkf5libkdepim [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [4:17.12.2-0ubuntu1]
[23:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted akonadi-calendar [armhf] (bionic-proposed) [4:17.12.2-0ubuntu1]
[23:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted kcalutils [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [4:17.12.2-0ubuntu1]
[23:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libkf5libkdepim [i386] (bionic-proposed) [4:17.12.2-0ubuntu1]
[23:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted akonadi-calendar [ppc64el] (bionic-proposed) [4:17.12.2-0ubuntu1]
[23:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libkf5libkdepim [s390x] (bionic-proposed) [4:17.12.2-0ubuntu1]
[23:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted libkf5libkdepim [arm64] (bionic-proposed) [4:17.12.2-0ubuntu1]


[05:37] <slacker_nl> morning all
[05:39] <micahg> hi sl
[05:39] <micahg> oops
[05:39] <micahg> hi slacker_nl
[05:41] <slacker_nl> hello micahg
[05:41] <slacker_nl> micahg: where are you from .be or .de?
[05:41] <slacker_nl> uhh
[05:41] <micahg> .us :)
[05:41] <slacker_nl> ahh
[05:42] <slacker_nl> your last name sounds dutch
[13:22] <Yos> nigel_nb, ping
[13:23] <nigel_nb> yes Yos
[13:23] <Yos> Someone with low-graphics problem, what logs should they include in their bug report?
[13:25] <nigel_nb> just ask for "apport-collect BUGNUMBER"
[13:25] <nigel_nb> Yos: against what package is the bug reported against?
[13:26] <Yos> They have it in linux ubuntu
[13:27] <nigel_nb> bug number?
[13:27] <Yos> Intersesting, how does "apport-collect BUGNUMBER" work?
[13:27] <Yos> one sec
[13:28] <Yos> 501599
[13:28] <nigel_nb> bug 501599
[13:28] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 501599 in linux "Ubuntu 9.10: "Ubuntu in running in low-graphics mode" (EEE PC 1101HA)" [Undecided,Incomplete] https://launchpad.net/bugs/501599
[13:28] <Yos> Yep, that's it
[13:29] <Yos> I marked it as incomplete until more info is provided to confirm it
[13:30] <nigel_nb> Yos: first, you need to change the package to xorg
[13:30] <Yos> Ok
[13:32] <Yos> Done
[13:33] <nigel_nb> now, ask user to run "apport-collect 501599" in terminal so that the required information can be attached
[13:34] <Yos> Will it be attached automatically to the bug ?
[13:35] <nigel_nb> yep
[13:35] <nigel_nb> Xorg has an apport hook, it will collect all the logs and information attached
[13:35] <nigel_nb> automatically :)
[13:35] <Yos> Cool
[13:38] <Yos> Nice trick :D
[13:41] <nigel_nb> hehe
[13:44] <Yos> I hope it doesn't make a difference that I used x instead of X in the package name
[13:48] <nigel_nb> Yos: Nope
[13:48] <nigel_nb> it doesn't
[15:17] <^arky^> hi
[15:17] <cjohnston> hi ^arky^
[16:06] <slacker_nl> is there a section to report bugs on ubuntu's wiki?
[16:06] <slacker_nl> s/in/for/
[16:08] <micahg> slacker_nl: the ML
[16:08] <slacker_nl> ML?
[16:08] <micahg> slacker_nl: mailing list
[16:08] <slacker_nl> ahh
[16:24] <\vish> slacker_nl: you could just correct the wiki , right?
[16:32] <micahg> \vish: depends if it's a controversial thing
[16:33] <\vish> hmm... we certainly wouldnt want to do that  :)

[16:57] <cjohnston> hggdh: agreed
[17:00] <hggdh> :-)
[17:02] <cjohnston> how goes hggdh?
[17:02] <hggdh> life goes on, with little regard to us ;-)
[17:03] <hggdh> which is to say -- life is good (beats being dead)
[17:06] <cjohnston> true
[17:16] <matti> ;]
[17:18] <cjohnston> hey matti
[17:19] <matti> Hi cjohnston ;]
[18:34] <yofel> bug 462895 Low/Triaged
[18:34] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 462895 in python-qt4 "python-qt4-doc examples do not work" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/462895
[18:38] <yofel> and bug 381409 would be whishlist I think
[18:38] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 381409 in python-qt4 "python-qt4 depends on phonon" [Undecided,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/381409
[18:48] <micahg> yofel: wishlist done
[18:49] <micahg> yofel: Low/Triaged done
[18:49] <yofel> thx :)
[22:12] <jibel> hi, anyone with knowledge of install-info could take a look at bug 295542 ?
[22:12] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 295542 in texinfo "Texlive2008 install-info conflicts with system's version of install-info" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/295542
[22:13] <jibel> shouldn't have this been fixed with the transition to gnu's i-i in 9.10 ?
[22:32] <hggdh> jibel: I do not understand -- the reporter is using an unpackaged install-info
[22:34] <hggdh> so there could be problems, as far as I can understand
[22:40] <jibel> hggdh, sure this is an unpackaged version, and I was about to simply close it.
[22:40] <jibel> hggdh, but I've seen this many times when processing install failure reports.
[22:42] <jibel> Is there a place in the wiki to document this kind of issue ?
[22:42] <hggdh> for install-info, I do not know of any
[22:43] <hggdh> but if this has been happening, it might be a good idea to add an entry somewhere
[22:44] <jibel> I've created the page https://wiki.ubuntu.com/DebuggingApportPackage with general install issues.
[22:45] <jibel> Do you think it's worth adding another one with known installation issues but for specific packages ?
[22:47] <hggdh> jibel: wouldn't it be better to rename the page to something else (like DebuggingUpdatesIssues)?
[22:48] <hggdh> otherwise THANK YOU! ;-)
[22:48] <hggdh> reason is the pages does not really deal with apport, but with install/update of packages
[22:49] <BUGabundo> hey guys
[22:49] <hggdh> hey BUGabundo
[22:51] <jibel> hggdh, will rename, and merge the 'How to triage' section of DebuggingUpdateManager, I'll see with bdmurray when he's back.
[22:52] <jibel> Finally I will create another page with known installation issues, otherwise there will be to much content.
[22:53] <jibel> s/to/too/
[22:53] <hggdh> jibel: thank you
[22:54] <jibel> hggdh, thank you too


[02:10] <dega> hello quasslers
[02:10] <dega> aa
 Namaste! dega
 hello, i need support,  i tried simple screen recorder, my voice was too low, not comfortible to listen, i thougt there was problem about my mic, 2 days ago as i shared here i put ram and ssd to laptop and they installed win10 to show me it works but there was bios problem cuz of ram, so i couldnt install lubuntu, that night, before going
 in short there s problem at lubuntu about getting my voice via mic
[08:25] <guiverc> @tbs, I have no experience with recording voice via mic, but I'd suggest looking in pavucontrol (or pavucontrol-qt if using modern lxqt) to increase volume..   If i look in my own, i gives blank and "No application is currently recording audio" but I'd hope you'd have options there with OBS etc installed
 guiverc, it s not about increasing voice, cuz i also tried it before, but it just reduce its quality
[17:48] <nmzm> Hello everyone :)
[18:06] <wxl> heyo nmzm
[19:01] <tipreg> Hello, desperate here. I had lubuntu on a machine with 500G almost full hard disk.  Is there any way to recover the data?
[19:02] <wxl> if they made a new partition, quite possibly. if they throttled over the install, no…
[19:02] <tomreyn> tipreg: only what was not overwritten probably. create an image of it, store it elsewehre, use testdisk against the image
[19:02] <wxl> i mean i guess there's some remote possibility some of the data could exist in free space, but it would take some hardcore forensics to even get to that
[19:03] <tomreyn> and... you need to always have abackup of any data you consider relevant, not only when there are people around who might install windows over your precious single copy.
[19:03] <tipreg> yes, just never imagined this could happen
[19:04] <wxl> thus the word "always" XD
[19:04] <tipreg> So is there a good chance i can recover most of it?
[19:04] <tomreyn> there are many other scenarios which could have had a comparable result.
[19:05] <tomreyn> there's a chance you may be able to recover parts of it, but without more details it's impossible to tell.
[19:06] <tipreg> he just installed windows overwriting lubuntu, nothing else (!)
[19:06] <tomreyn> and recovery of those parts will most liklely involve work by someone with a minimal level of experience in forensics.
[19:06] <wxl> yes, that
[19:06] <mycrap> will gparted recover anything in that situation?
[19:07] <wxl> you would first need to do what tomreyn suggested: image it somewhere else (`dd` is what i would use but it's a dangerous tool)
[19:07] <tipreg> I feel better for that "what was not overwritten probably"
[19:08] <wxl> well that's the other thing: data is not stored sequentially
[19:09] <tipreg> Why is it better to use testdisk on the image rather than directly on the disk?
[19:09] <tomreyn> the most common mistake after such an event is that users continue to write to the storage which is afected, such as by rebooting form a system storewd on it, or otherwise mounting data from it in read-write mode. if you do this, you're actively working against the goal of data recovery. thus you need to create an image first of all.
[19:10] <tomreyn> sorry about the typos, hope you can read it nevertheless
[19:10] <tipreg> ok, can i please ask you for an exact step-by-step
[19:11] <tipreg> also i am not sure what i will be using (usb?)
[19:11] <tipreg> (pendrive)
[19:12] <tipreg> I cant afford aforensics expert, have to do it myself
[19:12] <tipreg> unfortunately
[19:12] <tomreyn> any storage which can handle several writes and won't loose the data soon (you can create multiple copies and store it on different storages once you have created one copy)
[19:13] <tomreyn> which impact does it have to your life if this data is lost, if i may ask?
[19:13] <tipreg> Do i create the image from windows or from a live-linux?
[19:13] <nmzm> Guys, is there a way to check which version of libsdl2-mixer is installed? Not from the repository
[19:14] <tipreg> 5 years of work thrown in the garbage
[19:14] <tomreyn> hmm, and you don't even have an older backup of it?
[19:15] <tipreg> maybe some parts, but not most of it
[19:15] <tipreg> yes my mistake
[19:15] <tipreg> here
[19:15] <tomreyn> i don't mean to judge, i'm just asking.
[19:15] <tipreg> I should have had it fully backedup
[19:16] <tipreg> but this scenario was completely unpredictable
[19:16] <tomreyn> no, loss of data from a single storage is very predictable
[19:16] <tipreg> I mean who would do something like that... just idiot isn't enough...
[19:17] <tomreyn> the cause is unexpected, i agree
[19:17] <tomreyn> but you generally need to prepare better in the future
[19:17] <tomreyn> which other storage media do you have available to store those 500GB on?
[19:18] <tipreg> usbdisk
[19:18] <tomreyn> flash storage is an option but an SSD or HDD would be better
[19:18] <tipreg> yes externaldisk i mean
 @nmzm [<nmzm> Guys, is there a way to check which version of libsdl2-mixer is installed …], Are you saying you know you didnt install from the repos? If not, where?
[19:19] <tipreg> (sorry)
 500gb flash storage? so they made it too. i wonder how expensive it s
[19:19] <tipreg> consider me a beginner, actually I am
[19:20] <nmzm> lubot: Compiled from source code and then: sudo make install. So dpkg -l | grep sdl can't see it
[19:20] <nmzm> But it's installed in the system
 @nmzm [<nmzm> lubot: Compiled from source code and then: sudo make install. So dpkg -l …], Where did you get the source?
[19:22] <nmzm> Lubot: From the official website I believe. From here -> https://www.libsdl.org/projects/SDL_mixer/
[19:22] <tomreyn> tipreg: no worries, you're doing well. i need to persist on this, though: which kind of storage is this external, usb connected storage? is it a classic ultra-portable flash storage "usb stick", is it a (larger in physical dimensions, at least 1.5 inch width) SSD, is it a (even larger in physical dimensions, at least 2.5 inch width) HDD?
[19:22] <tomreyn> we can also find out when you have it connected.
[19:22] <tipreg> yes the larger one (dont have it right now though)
[19:23] <tipreg> it's a classic external hd maybetoshiba
[19:23] <tomreyn> tipreg: okay, for now tell me whether anything is running off this 500 GB storage you need to recover data from
[19:23] <nmzm> Lubot: I can see that ist's 2.0.4 on the website, but I need to add a check if it's installed in the script. Like: If sdl2-mixer=2.0.4 - continue, else: error(example)
[19:23] <tipreg> sorry i dont undertsnad what you mean
[19:24] <tipreg> running off?
[19:24] <tipreg> (also english not my first language)
[19:24] <tomreyn> tipreg: you mentioned a windows installation, you are on this lubuntu channel so you probably also have an ubuntu installation on this computer. is it a dual-boot system?
[19:24] <tipreg> no, this is another computer
[19:25] <tomreyn> is the computer with the 500 GB disk attached to it currently running?
[19:25] <tipreg> I dont have the externaldisk nor that "nowwindows machine" here with me in this moment
[19:26] <tipreg> the nowwindows machine is turned off (and not here with me now)
[19:26] <tomreyn> ah, so we can only discuss what your next steps should be, but can't guide you live now
[19:27] <tipreg> yes - though would have been nice i guess
[19:27] <tipreg> i mean nice to have you with me during the process
[19:28] <tipreg> but i'll try by myself and come back in case
[19:28] <tipreg> hoping to find you again
[19:28] <tomreyn> you can just come back here when you're about to do it, someone may be around, or if not here, then in #ubuntu
[19:29] <tomreyn> tipreg: so to keep it simple, you should have two separate external storages ready to image the 500 GB disk:
[19:29] <tipreg> yes maybe I'll do - but they (this computer and the other) are in different locations
[19:29] <tipreg> i have to move one
[19:30] <tipreg> ok so i am with you
 @nmzm> Lubot: From the official website I believe. From here - [<nmzm> Lubot: From the official website I believe. From here -> https://www.libs …], See `strings` and `readelf` suggestions here https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/58846/viewing-linux-library-executable-version-info#58849
[19:30] <tomreyn> tipreg: one should be a bootable (l)ubuntu live system (which you could prepare now), the other should be a storage (ideally ssd or hdd) which can hold those 500 GB data.
[19:30] <tipreg> is it ok if the live system is on a pendrive?
[19:30] <nmzm> lubot: Thank you!
[19:30] <tomreyn> tipreg: sure
[19:31] <tomreyn> this won't take many sustained writes.
[19:32] <tipreg> possible problem: maybe that computer won'allow usb-boot (it's old)
[19:32] <tipreg> maybe only cd
 i thought 500gb flash disk would be more expensive
[19:32] <tipreg> cd-boot
[19:32] <tipreg> is that also ok?
[19:32] <tomreyn> tipreg: dvd should also work, i guess.
[19:32] <tipreg> which distro?
[19:33] <tomreyn> tipreg: what did you have running on it before windows got installed?
[19:33] <tipreg> afornsics one or just lubuntu?
 there s some data recovery specialezed distros at distrowatch
[19:33] <tipreg> before windows lubuntu
[19:33] <tomreyn> tipreg: do you know which version of lubuntu you had?
[19:34] <tomreyn> tipreg: it's ok to say "no" if you're not sure, i'm just wondering
[19:34] <tipreg> was an older lts, not sure
[19:34] <tipreg> LTS
[19:35] <tipreg> not sure exactly which
[19:35] <tomreyn> tipreg: just use the latest stable lubuntu then
[19:36] <tipreg> Ok so i launch tthe dvd with lubuntu on the windows machine and then?
[19:36] <tipreg> I connect the externald drive?
[19:36] <tomreyn> tipreg: actually it's probably better if you use lubuntu 18.04 LTS (atest LTS release), since 19.10 (latest stable release) has a different interface you're not used to.
 https://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=clonezilla
[19:37] <tipreg> ok
 ş found this
[19:37] <tomreyn> tipreg: once you have the system booted off it, you need to attach the other large storage device which can hold the 500 GB image file.
[19:38] <tomreyn> tipreg: test whether and ensure that you can write to it, as root.
[19:39] <tipreg> ok - the other device must be empty even if it's say 1tb ?
[19:39] <tipreg> or is it ok as long as it has 500G free?
[19:40] <tipreg> how should it be formatted? fat? ext?
[19:41] <tomreyn> i would recommend it, but it's not required to be empty. you just need to be able to store the 500 GB there. you woill later also need to have some place to restore data that you recovered form this image. so if you want to store recovered data on the same device you have the image on (actually not an ideal situation, a separate storage would be better) then you'll need more than those 500 GB
[19:42] <tomreyn> i'd use an ext4 file system, or any journalled file system lubuntu supports, but it is less relevant
[19:42] <tipreg> even fat would be ok?
[19:42] <tipreg> I am confused because it's windows now
[19:43] <tomreyn> that's not a journalled file system, but if you have to use fat that can work too.
[19:43] <tomreyn> a windows alternative to ext3/4 is ntfs
[19:43] <tipreg> I mean the fact that it's windows now doesn't suggest to use fat?
[19:43] <tomreyn> no
[19:43] <tipreg> ok
[19:44] <tipreg> (sorry for stupid questions)
[19:44] <tipreg> :)
[19:44] <tipreg> so not even ntfs would be better?
[19:44] <tipreg> I mean ext is just as fine or better
[19:44] <tomreyn> don't try to access your old data using any of the file system or partition strcutures the windows installation created on the 500 GB drive, in fact dont try to access it at all other than by using the dd command
[19:45] <tipreg> not familiar with the dd command
[19:46] <tipreg> !dd
[19:47] <tomreyn> assuming the file system you will recover to is mounted at /media/myusername/my_external_recovery_filesystem and the 500 GB storage you want to recover is located at /dev/sdZ, you would use this command to create the image file:
[19:49] <tomreyn> sudo dd if=/dev/sdZ of=/media/myusername/my_external_recovery_filesystem/sdZ.image bs=8M
 will he create iso file of his 500gb? can i use this iso to reinstall same lubuntu system with its drivers and updates ?
[19:49] <tomreyn> no, tbs
 i mean if i do it on my system, not his
[19:50] <tipreg> ok so that creates the image (was thinking of xfburn)
[19:51] <tipreg> and then how to dotestdisk on the image?
[19:51] <tomreyn> tipreg: the hardest part will be identifying the imaging source and destination. "sudo lsblk" may help you there.
[19:51] <tipreg> should i bring it on the other (this) computer?
[19:52] <tipreg> I am not sure what you mean
[19:52] <tipreg> (last thing you said)
[19:53] <tomreyn> tipreg: concentrate on doing hte image first of all, this wilkl be a difficult task already. once you have this testdisk is the next step.
[19:53] <tomreyn> most importantly, be aware that dd is a dangerous utility. if you get those options wrong you may well overwrite the wrong storage and destroy more data
[19:54] <tomreyn> so make double sure (amybe get feedback here on this) that you got the if= and of= right
[19:55] <tipreg> the if is where i'm writng to and the of is where i'm writing from, right? (this is the possible mistake?)
[19:55] <tomreyn> tipreg: i guess your first step should be to prepare the lubuntu 18.04 bootable usb stick or dvd, bring it to the other computer, boot it off it, and login to the chat from there.
 first he can try to use dd command to create bootable usb disk so he can pratice ?
[19:55] <tomreyn> tipreg: if= IN file, of= OUT file.
 forexample with lubuntu iso
[19:56] <tomreyn> tbs: yes, if tipreg has an usb stick for this purpose (and not just optiocal media) then this could be done, feel free to guide.
[19:57] <tomreyn> tipreg: so if) is the source, of= is the destination, you had assumed otherwise.
[19:57] <tomreyn> *if=
[19:58] <tipreg> yes that's the possible mistake, any other possible mistakes?
[19:59] <tipreg> bs=8M ?
 if == input file … of == output file … usage example: … $ sudo dd status=progress if=name-of.iso of=/dev/sdb
[19:59] <tomreyn> tipreg: if of points to the wrong location, you'll write data there instead, possibly overwriting data or a full disk.
 this s basic usage of dd for creating bootable disk
[19:59] <tipreg> Ok, I will remember to double check there
 and i guess u may want to read it but im not sure ofcourse https://www.ostechnix.com/how-to-create-bootable-usb-drive-using-dd-command/
[20:00] <tipreg> what is bs=8M ?
[20:00] <tomreyn> tipreg: bs=8M just means that the copying process will read 8 MB of data then write those, then repeat.
[20:00] <tipreg> ok, no mistake can be done there?
[20:01] <tomreyn> tipreg: not unless there are typos. ;)
[20:01] <tipreg> ok
[20:01] <tipreg> so this is what you meant when you said identifying the imaging source and destination
[20:01] <tipreg> ?
[20:02] <tipreg> or is there more?
[20:02] <tomreyn> this was just a complicated way of saying "make sure you get if= and of= right".
[20:02] <tipreg> ok
[20:02] <tomreyn> i'll have some food now, should be back later, good luck
[20:02] <tipreg> now we are at the testdisk part?
[20:03] <tipreg> ok
[20:03] <tipreg> thank you
 have a nice meal tomyern:)
 as a suggest u can use 1/3 of ur stomach for food, 1/3 of ur stomach for water, 1/3 of ur stomach for air, also 2 times eating for a day
[20:07] <tipreg> Is it easy to use testdisk?
[20:07] <tipreg> I mean can a beginner manage?
 do u know virtual box?
 u can try it there i guess
[20:21] <tipreg> Thank you all
[20:22] <tipreg> Will check log later in case anybody will have added something
[20:23] <tipreg> Good thing is I feel a little better
[20:23] <tipreg> :)
[21:03] <Sefa> hello everyone, i am experianceing trouble trying to install lubuntu on my device, i am on the particioning part and dont know how to progress. Help would be much apreciated thanks in advance
[21:06] <tomreyn> Sefa: hi, which lubuntu version is it, and what's the partitioning trouble about?
[21:07] <tomreyn> have you considered automated partitioning?
[21:07] <Sefa> i dont have the option for automated partitoning
[21:08] <Sefa> its the lates version
[21:10] <bwew253tgzwhbd> guys if i upgrade lubuntu 19.10 to 20.4 when 20.04 is officially released, will my sources.list also be updated ??
 If you have swap enabled when you start the installer the erase disk option will not be presented.
 You can turn swap off in the terminal before you start `sudo swap off -a`
 Erase disk will be presented as an option after that.
[21:18] <Sefa> my terminal tells me swao is not a command he knows
[21:19] <Sefa> my terminal tells me swap is not a command he knows
 Not sure I follow you there. It is because in Ubuntu based distros swap partitions are automatically mounted. The installer will not install on a partition that is mounted.
[21:20] <Sefa> how does one unmount?
 @Sefa [<Sefa> my terminal tells me swap is not a command he knows], sorry that should have been all one command. autocorrect got me there. swapoff -a
 We put a notice in our manual regarding swap. https://manual.lubuntu.me/stable/1/1.3/installation.html
[21:26] <Sefa> okay done, but i still only have the manual partitioning
[21:42] <kc2bez> bwew253tgzwhbd: The upgrade script changes the sources but if you have any ppas enabled they will be disabled during the upgrade process and you will need to re-enable them when it gets done.


[03:18]  * solid_liq is now known as 2_tone_beat_up_old_stationwagon
[09:59] <fabo> Riddell: https://launchpad.net/~fboudra/+archive/kde/+packages
[20:41] <ulysses> is it enought to subscribe Jonathan Thomas to this bug, or shall I subscribe kubuntu-bugs too? https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/muon/+bug/901811
[20:44] <yofel> ulysses: kubuntu-bugs is already subscribed, so it's ok
[20:45] <ulysses> oh, fail
[20:45] <ulysses> too late and the night before an exam :P
[22:16] <Riddell> UDS is in california next? that breaks the europe/north america alternation
[22:22] <yofel> again?
[22:27] <Riddell> yofel: well it hasn't been in california for ages but it normally goes back to europe
[22:27] <yofel> yeah...
[22:47] <Riddell> fabo: what happened to the new package you said had to be done before networkmanagement?
[23:10] <apol> hi, can anybody tell me a little about QApt vs PackageKit as a backend?
[23:13] <glatzor> apol, what do you want to do?
[23:14] <apol> well, I'm considering to start some new development
[23:14] <apol> that would involve package management
[23:14] <Riddell> jussi: did you find out what was up with floodbots?  they're at it again in #kubuntu
[23:14] <Riddell> apol: this is the guy to ask about qapt https://launchpad.net/~echidnaman
[23:15] <Riddell> Daniel Nicoletti for kpackagekit of course
[23:16] <apol> hm
[23:16] <apol> ok
[23:17] <apol> isn't there any small issues list that I can find on the net? just to have an idea of why packagekit is not the best solution
[23:19] <glatzor> apol, if you want to support other distros you have to use packagekit
[23:20] <glatzor> apol, there is a system and a session interface. nowadays even aptdaemon provides the packagekit interface
[23:20] <apol> glatzor: and I should use qapt if...?
[23:20] <Riddell> glatzor is talking about the dbus interfaces
[23:21] <Riddell> depends if you want to use dbus or need to be more involved and use the libraries
[23:21] <glatzor> apol, if you want to develop very closely for debian/ubuntu and use special features of those
[23:21] <glatzor> apol, qapt is also installed by default - kpackagekit not
[23:22] <apol> hm
[23:22] <apol> I don't really see it, I guess I'll have to try
[23:22] <glatzor> apol, what should your application do?
[23:23] <apol> list, install, remove, etc
[23:23] <apol> and extract name, description and pictures if possible
[23:32] <glatzor> apol, you want to write a general purpose package manager?
[23:32] <apol> no
[23:34] <apol> and I don't really want to talk about projects before they start because it raises expectations where there shouldn't be :)