[00:09] <jjohansen> ogasawara: finally sent
[00:09] <jjohansen> sorry, its been a busy day
[00:09] <ogasawara> jjohansen: no worries
[01:29] <Sarvatt> ogasawara: big fat thumbs up on http://people.canonical.com/~ogasawara/lp644237/amd64/ here
[01:30] <Sarvatt> bah, I take that back, just needed more time to manifest - WARNING: at /home/ogasawara/maverick-amd64/ubuntu-2.6/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:1005 read_measured_perf_ctrs+0x78/0x90()
[01:33] <vanhoof> Sarvatt: try unplugging the power
[01:34] <vanhoof> Sarvatt: that seemed to trigger it in the bug report
[01:34] <vanhoof> not sure if thats true or not
[10:40] <tseliot> smb: do we have this commit in Maverick's kernel? http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/x86/linux-2.6-tip.git;a=commit;h=54ff7e595d763d894104d421b103a89f7becf47c
[10:41] <smb> tseliot, I check to be sure but I think this came with some of the later stable updates which will not be intitially in
[10:42] <tseliot> smb: I'm asking as it's supposed to solve a problem with Nvidia's beta driver (that I plan on uploading after RC): http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?p=2320537
[10:44] <smb> tseliot, It was in <IP_ADDRESS> which is not included on its own. You may try to convince ogasawara to pick it pre-stable for the day-0 update.
[10:45] <smb> The upstream stable updates for <IP_ADDRESS>..7 can only be uploaded when the day-0 is out in updates
[10:46] <tseliot> smb: ah, so things are frozen in the kernel now, I see
[10:47] <tseliot> a day-0 update would still be fine
[10:47] <tseliot> I'll discuss this with Nvidia too
[10:47] <smb> tseliot, As you _may_ have noticed from reading some mails. You are aware that we release on 10.10? ;-)
[10:47] <tseliot> smb: yes, kind of ;)
[10:47] <smb> Just checking :)
[13:46] <diwic> how can I run git blame but on an earlier version of the file than current HEAD?
[13:47] <smb> diwic, You can add a sha1 from the past
[13:48] <smb> git blame <sha1> <path to file>
[13:48] <smb> sha1 could also be a tag
[13:48] <diwic> hmm
[13:48] <diwic> it works now
[13:49] <diwic> I think you have to check out that old version through "git checkout" as well perhaps
[13:49] <smb> I did not think so
[13:50] <diwic> thanks anyway
[13:50] <diwic> :-)
[13:50] <smb> np :)
[15:31] <mpoirier> cooleney: I just checkout the lasted sound changes from TI - there is a lot of patches.
[17:50] <ogasawara> anyone seen JFo today?
[18:09] <jjohansen> ogasawara: hrmm, no but he was complaining of a really bad headache last night
[18:40] <ogasawara> Sarvatt: thanks for testing that kernel yesterday and also for posting a comment to the upstream bug report.  It looks like hpa has requested more info from you in the upstream bug report.  Care to follow up with him when you have a moment.
[18:40] <ogasawara> Sarvatt: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16322 (just for quick reference)
[18:41] <ubot2> bugzilla.kernel.org bug 16322 in Other "WARNING: at /arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:1005 read_measured_perf_ctrs+0x5a/0x70()" [Normal,New]
[19:15]  * tgardner lunches. where has the day gone?
[19:20] <vanhoof> ogasawara: Sarvatt is out atm, i'll follow-up so that data gets posted
[19:20] <Sarvatt> vanhoof: I responded! :)
[19:21] <Sarvatt> waiting for this hour long build to finish to reboot with the messed up bios setting to get the info he wanted
[19:21] <vanhoof> Sarvatt: oh, i thought i saw an email saying you'd be afk for a while
[19:21] <vanhoof> maybe that was yesterday
[19:21] <Sarvatt> that was yesterday yeah
[19:21] <vanhoof> NM :D
[19:21] <vanhoof> see how much im paying attention!
[19:22] <vanhoof> Sarvatt: i think ogasawara is talking about the needinfo from https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16322#c94
[19:22] <ubot2> bugzilla.kernel.org bug 16322 in Other "WARNING: at /arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h:1005 read_measured_perf_ctrs+0x5a/0x70()" [Normal,New]
[19:45]  * jjohansen -> lunch
[20:52]  * ogasawara lunch
[22:08] <sabdfl> hello rockstars
[22:08] <sabdfl> i heard i have you to thank for my longer battery life?
[22:08] <sabdfl> thank you :-)
[22:08] <sabdfl> quick question on iwlagn with 5300 chip
[22:09] <sabdfl> 03:00.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation Ultimate N WiFi Link 5300
[22:09] <sabdfl> that one
[22:09] <sabdfl> it fails every 3 minutes with N networks
[22:09] <sabdfl> firmware issue, Intel say they are working on a fix
[22:10] <sabdfl> workaround is simple:
[22:10] <sabdfl> mark@avril:~$ cat /etc/modprobe.d/intel-5300-iwlagn-disable11n.conf
[22:10] <sabdfl> options iwlagn 11n_disable=1
[22:12] <sabdfl> upstream bug is at https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=16691
[22:12] <ubot2> bugzilla.kernel.org bug 16691 in Wireless "IPW5100: iwlagn broken with 2.6.34.x to <IP_ADDRESS> update" [High,New]
[22:12] <sabdfl> intel's talking about new firmware
[22:12] <ogasawara> sabdfl: thanks for the heads up, do you know if Intel mentioned an eta for a firmware update?
[22:12] <sabdfl> nope
[22:12] <sabdfl> seems they are worried about it
[22:13] <sabdfl> workaround is confirmed good on two different laptops at Chez Moi
[22:13] <ogasawara> sabdfl: I'll make sure we make a release note for this at the very least.
[22:13] <sabdfl> without it, all these intel-based laptops go bustificated quickly on n networks
[22:14] <sabdfl> i'd prefer we put the 11n_disable thing in, it's a real showstopper, and end-users won't find the workaround
[22:14] <ogasawara> sabdfl: other option would be to add a temporary quirk to module-init-tools till we get the newer firmware
[22:14] <sabdfl> right, 11n_disable should be removed when we get the new firmware
[22:15] <sabdfl> Comment #22 From<EMAIL_ADDRESS>2010-09-22 20:20:02
[22:15] <sabdfl> I don't want to close this bug and we are very active working on this and we
[22:15] <sabdfl> believe we already have a solution for it. We are in the process of figure out
[22:15] <sabdfl> how to deliver the experimental version of uCode for user to test it out.
[22:17] <ogasawara> robbiew: around?  ^^
[22:17] <robbiew> ogasawara: yep
[22:17] <ogasawara> robbiew: just a heads up about the above discussion
[22:18] <sabdfl> sorry robbie. this was all just going too smoothly :-)
[22:22] <robbiew> ogasawara: so planning on adding another 0-day update?
[22:24] <ogasawara> robbiew: it's rather an update to module-init-tools to add the temporary disablement.  we could do it as a 0-day upload or before if ok'd by the release team.
[22:25] <sabdfl> i bet we have a bug report for it
[22:26] <robbiew> ogasawara: hmm...seems harmless enough...as it's just an option (famous last words)
[22:27] <sabdfl><EMAIL_ADDRESS>[22:27] <ogasawara> robbiew: I haven't touched module-init-tools much, but I think I could try to throw together a test package for sabdfl to test
[22:27] <robbiew> sabdfl: ack, thnx
[22:28] <sabdfl> happy to test
[22:28] <robbiew> ogasawara: ok
[22:28] <sabdfl> affects Lenovo x201 and Dell TX2
[22:28] <sabdfl> at least, probably more
[22:29] <sabdfl> i don't think pure-n networks are that widespread yet, but still
[22:29] <sabdfl> only going to get more so
[22:30] <sabdfl> leeanne, feel free to bring me PPA for test or url to .deb. I'm packing it in for the evening but have time tomorrow. Am away over the weekend (kiko's wedding) and back Tues
[22:30] <sabdfl> ping me, not bring me
[22:30] <sabdfl> cheers
[22:30]  * robbiew didn't even know kiko was engaged
[22:30] <robbiew> lol
[22:31] <robbiew> ogasawara: I guess the only thing we have to remember is to disable this option once the fix arrives...but shouldn't be a big deal...n networks aren't THAT common yet
[22:32] <robbiew> obviously we need to release note it...so I'll attach bug 630748 to ubuntu-release-notes
[22:32] <ubot2> Launchpad bug 630748 in linux (Ubuntu Maverick) (and 1 other project) "iwlagn degrades quickly during normal wifi session (affects: 4) (dups: 1) (heat: 26)" [High,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/630748
[22:33] <ogasawara> robbiew: I'll put a note in the changelog that the patch needs reverting once we get updated firmware.  I'll coordinate with tgardner to get it uploaded as I'm not sure I have upload rights for module-init-tools.
[22:34] <robbiew> ogasawara: ok...I targeted the bug to -updates, since a real FIX won't be available until then anyway
[22:34] <ogasawara> robbiew: ack


[02:41] <jthomas_> Hello all
[02:42] <jthomas_> I am facing some problems when compiling instrumented arm assembly on ubuntu-arm
[02:42] <jthomas_> I am trying to add some instrumentation code that does a simple printf
[02:42] <jthomas_> but for some reason, I am getting a segmentation fault
[02:42] <jthomas_> the interesting fact is that
[02:43] <jthomas_> since printf requires the arguments to be put into r0
[02:43] <jthomas_> for whichever basic block that does not modify r0, the instrumentation works
[02:44] <jthomas_> but when I instrument any basic block that modifies r0, either storing or loading the value of r0, then I get a segmentation fault
[02:44] <jthomas_> any idea as to why this is happening
[02:44] <jthomas_> any help would be great
[03:24] <jthomas_> any help?
[07:17] <ppisati> morning
[15:16] <zul> ogra is there any documentation about putting ubuntu arm on a toshiba ac100?
[15:17] <ogra_> zul, yes
[15:18] <ogra_> zul, you got one ?!?
[15:18] <zul> ogra_: yep, christmas came early
[15:18] <ogra_> awesome
[15:19] <ogra_> zul, https://launchpad.net/~ac100/+archive/ppa follow the link to my people account
[15:19] <zul> android sucks as an os ;)
[15:19] <ogra_> yeah
[15:19] <ogra_> currentl installation means to jump thought some hoops
[15:20] <lilstevie> zul: android serves a purpose
[15:20] <lilstevie> just not on tablet devices
[15:20] <ogra_> i'm working on a proper installer that should be ready within this week
[15:20] <ogra_> lilstevie, i would use it on a tablet ... but on nothing with a keyboard
[15:21] <lilstevie> ogra_: it is ok on the galaxy tab
[15:21] <ogra_> yeah
[15:21] <lilstevie> but ubuntu is still better
[15:21] <ogra_> :)
[15:22] <ogra_> zul, start with http://developer.download.nvidia.com/tegra/files/os/tegra_froyo_20110207.run.gz it contains the nvflash utiliy you will need to flash the new kernel to the device
[15:22] <lilstevie> the easiest way to explain how android feels on the tab is like having a Ferrari that is locked out of 4th gear +
[15:22] <zul> ogra_: cool ll poke around
[15:23] <zul> and ask if i need help
[15:23] <ogra_> zul, http://ac100.gudinna.com/README/ has outdated instructions for older images ... the commands are stil the same though
[15:23] <lilstevie> it  works just not very very
[15:26] <gildean> zul: and if you want 3d, suspend and sound, you can follow my guide for .32 http://ac100.tunk.org/wiki/phh
[15:26] <ndec> ogra_: hi. i installed natty from the minimal FS. what's the meta package to install the full desktop? ubuntu-netbook or ubuntu-desktop?
[15:26] <zul> gildean: meh
[15:26] <gildean> but it has a bunch of nvidia-binaries and crap like that
[15:27] <ogra_> ndec, up to oneiric its ubuntu-netbook
[15:27] <ogra_> with this release we'll switch to -desktop on arm too
[15:27] <ndec> ogra_: thx
[15:27] <zul> im more interested in running other things other that desktop on it
[15:27] <ogra_> gildean, zul surely wants to work with things like lxc
[15:27] <ogra_> so he should use a sane kernel
[15:27] <gildean> ogra_: yeah, just mentioning :)
[15:28] <zul> ogra_: and normal server work loads ;)
[15:28] <ogra_> yeah
[15:28] <ndec> ogra_: so on natty ubuntu-netbook should install the unity2D?
[15:28] <ogra_> zul, go for my .37 image then, if you run into issues, just ping ... same goes for the kernel, if you are mising options or patches, tell me
[15:29] <ogra_> ndec, both actually
[15:29] <zul> will do
[15:29] <ogra_> unity as well as unity-2d
[15:29] <ogra_> defaulting to 2d
[15:29] <ndec> ogra_: ok.. 1gb is being installed ;-)
[15:32] <lilstevie> I really wish I could crack the 3D accel nut on the tab
[15:32] <lilstevie> unity would be win on the tab
[15:33] <ogra_> lilstevie, use unity-2d as we do in all arm images ?
[15:33] <lilstevie> ogra_: it fails
[15:33] <ogra_> and florence so you have an android like kbd
[15:33] <ogra_> it fails ?
[15:33] <ogra_> bug number ?
[15:34] <ogra_> :)
[15:34] <lilstevie> ogra_: not bug number
[15:34] <lilstevie> unless you want my own trac :p
[15:34] <lilstevie> I have zero accel
[15:34] <lilstevie> even 2D
[15:34] <ogra_> and ?
[15:34] <lilstevie> gnome-classic is the only thing that doesn't put too much load on the cpu
[15:34] <ogra_> my ac100 does only framebuffer too
[15:35] <ogra_> but unity-2d is snappier than the 3D one on my intel laptop
[15:35] <lilstevie> your ac100 is also dualcore :)
[15:35] <ogra_> true
[15:35] <ogra_> but the cores are not actually used for graphics stuff
[15:35] <lilstevie> my software framebuffer is a bit fail
[15:36] <lilstevie> the SGX540 is meant to software accelerate without the need for the userland blobs
[15:36] <lilstevie> it is a bug my end though
[15:36] <lilstevie> the 2.6.32 sourcedrop from samsung had the most ugly unoptimized code
[21:28] <sveinse> I'm sitting here upgrading our target to natty, and I've hit this --sysroot thing. How can I compile Qt (not from deb source) with xdeb ? E.g. are there any tutorials of how to build with xdeb out there?
[21:29] <sveinse> uhm, *cross compile Qt
[21:30] <sveinse> Dodgy network atm?
[21:54] <Neko> if anyone's answering sveinse's questions, I'd also like to know how to get xdeb to work without actually packaging things as source packages...
[21:54] <Neko> is there something like a cross-debhelper?
[22:09] <Neko> hrw, nudge?
[22:20] <hallyn> ogra_: my update fetched your new kernel, buti'm not booting from it.  how do i update it?  flash-kernel with options, or some different command?
[22:28] <hallyn> went ahead an dared to flash-kernel
[22:28] <hallyn> zul: how's your's treating you?
[22:30] <hallyn> zul: yay, i have a running container
[23:28] <zul> hallyn: missing some usb cables
[23:35] <hallyn> doh
[23:36] <hallyn> well lxc is working for me, with the -2 kernel.  will put off heavier testing till tomorrow
[23:36] <hallyn> (since today is holiday :)
[23:37] <stgraber> hallyn: now we just need some ARM machines with fast I/Os to actually do something useful in containers ;)
[23:38] <zul> i actually need to see if openstack works first
[23:46] <hallyn> zul: jikes, good luck.  gonna use an external hd for that?
[23:47] <zul> nfs probably
[23:47] <hallyn> stgraber: that would make it easier to test a range of uses, yes :)
[23:47] <hallyn> zul: ah
[23:48] <hallyn> maybe i'll install lvm on a big usb stick so i can do some quick cloning :)
[23:48] <zul> bbl need to reboot to hopefully fix this freaking ipod


[13:27] <MutantTurkey> red lion for breakfast is so nice
[13:44] <jedijf> MutantTurkey++
[13:44] <jedijf> what are you doing in horsham?
[13:45] <MutantTurkey> eating breakfast that is all.
[13:45] <jedijf> good choice, that's my client
[13:45] <MutantTurkey> oh yeah?
[13:46] <jedijf> certainly, what toast did you have with breakfast...white, wheat or rye
[13:46] <jedijf> rolls, bagels
[13:46] <MutantTurkey> rye of course
[13:47] <jedijf> item 0768, #4 rye sliced
[13:47] <MutantTurkey> hahaha you sure know your bread
[13:47] <jedijf> it's a curse
[13:48] <MutantTurkey> do you find yourself hating bread more and more as the days go by?
[13:49]  * jedijf doesn't think the bread hate can increase
[13:49] <JonathanD> yay bread.
[13:49] <JonathanD> I love me some rye bread.
[13:49] <jedijf> that's a lie.....actually I love it, that's part of the curse
[13:50] <MutantTurkey> D: even worse.
[13:50] <jedijf> well, not the bread so much, but the selling it.....super excited about new roll(s) I am working on
[13:50] <MutantTurkey> I am sure they will be delicious
[13:51] <jedijf> i really don't care about that either; i let the clients decide that, i just like the *activity* of selling
[13:52] <MutantTurkey> right
[13:52]  * jedijf <----whore
[13:53]  * jedijf goes back to the corner
[14:17]  * InHisName notes that he has no rye in the house. And too cold to leave.
[14:24] <InHisName> jedijf: do the new rolls  have a NEW grain besides the big four?   oats, wheat, corn, rice ?
[14:25] <JonathanD> They have rubber grain.
[14:27] <InHisName> Will they bounce like a super-ball ?
[14:54] <InHisName> back online for a bit again
[17:32] <MutantTurkey> get off the roads ladies and gents, the turkey has gotten his permit!
[17:38] <ChinnoDog> uh oh
[17:40] <ChinnoDog> How will we recognize the turkeymobile?
[17:49] <EvilPhoenix> because it'll have a big red target on it :P
[17:49] <EvilPhoenix> because the police will be keeping an eye on him
[17:49] <andrew> ChinnoDog: http://images2.travbuddy.com/1301348_12277294435397.jpg
[18:00] <ChinnoDog> haha
[18:00] <ChinnoDog> turkeymobile++
[18:14] <EvilPhoenix> that is lol :P
[18:14] <EvilPhoenix> what ChinnoDog said, turkeymobile++
[18:23] <waltman> krispykreme++
[18:47] <EvilPhoenix> grah, vbox crashed while i was testing natty