[00:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: slurm-wlm-contrib [arm64] (oracular-proposed/multiverse) [23.11.6-1] (no packageset)
[07:33] <LocutusOfBorg> hello, any news about the transition tracker failing to start ben?
[09:14] <vorlon> LocutusOfBorg: ubuntu-build --retry, without --batch?
[09:15] <vorlon> tjaalton: pycache> heh apparently?
[09:15] <vorlon> tjaalton: (but it hasn't changed at all since the .1 upload ;P)
[10:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: qemu (jammy-proposed/main) [1:6.2+dfsg-2ubuntu6.19 => 1:6.2+dfsg-2ubuntu6.20] (ubuntu-server, virt)
[10:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: libreoffice (mantic-proposed/main) [4:7.6.6-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS> => 4:7.6.7-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>] (ubuntu-desktop)
[11:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: nxtomo [amd64] (oracular-proposed/universe) [1.2.3-2] (no packageset)
[13:03] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, yes
[14:15] <tsimonq2> vorlon, LocutusOfBorg: Ben not running> From my own personal experience, this could very likely be because of /srv/mirrors/ubuntu not having armhf for Oracular... of course I don't have SSH access, could someone Canonical-side take a look?
[14:15] <vorlon> that's not what it is
[14:15] <tsimonq2> oh?
[14:15] <vorlon> I already looked at this last week
[14:17] <tsimonq2> ok :) anything further we can do to help?
[14:19] <vorlon> well LocutusOfBorg proposed a speculative merge of salsa upstream to try to address the current backtrace that I posted here last week, which I'm not enthusiastic about
[14:20] <vorlon> if someone were to prove that it actually fixes the backtrace, I would JFDI but I don't want to have to deal with an upgrade that maybe doesn't fix this backtrace *and* could introduce different issues
[14:26] <tsimonq2> FWIW, using the configs repo and Oracular's Ben (with some quick changes to global.conf to point to actual directories on my system rather than /srv/[etc.]), I have been able to produce the intended output.
[14:26] <tsimonq2> Additionally, lp:ubuntu-transition-tracker does not reflect prod anyway...
[14:27] <tsimonq2> I agree we should do the upgrade to a newer Ben, but I'll get you some proof to double check things.
[14:30] <vorlon> tsimonq2: I don't know what lp:ubuntu-transition-tracker is for, we are running ben from package on 20.04
[14:32] <tsimonq2> vorlon: I thought (before I noticed it didn't deploy automatically) that prod would reflect what is in lp:ubuntu-transition-tracker instead of a package... that being said, the package in question is a backport of Jammy's Ben to Focal.
[14:32] <tsimonq2> I have vague memories of asking for that to be done manually... but don't remember the specifics.
[14:51] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: edubuntu-artwork (noble-proposed/universe) [24.04.26 => <IP_ADDRESS>] (no packageset)
[14:52] <vorlon> tsimonq2: the failure here is in auto-transition anyway, not ben
[14:55] <vorlon> and it is actually a problem of mozc binaries being in the release pocket from armhf but the source not, so I'll clean that up now and I think that will take care of the backtrace
[14:57] <tsimonq2> vorlon: That's about where I'm at - looking to see if perhaps error handling can be better with auto-transition...
[14:57] <tsimonq2> thanks either way :)
[14:58] <vorlon> however I don't know why these binaries were present if the source wasn't, so maybe we have to iterate and will hit others in the same situation
[14:59] <vorlon> (or check armhf Packages + Sources for integrity checking, which I don't have time to do just at the moment)
[16:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected abiword [source] (noble-proposed) [3.0.5~dfsg-3.2build5]
[16:32] <tsimonq2> vorlon: Rebase on top of Salsa's version with Python 3 porting (and some other minor fixes): https://code.launchpad.net/~tsimonq2/auto-transition/+git/auto-transition/+merge/465980
[16:32] <LocutusOfBorg> vorlon, did the new run work?
[16:32] <tsimonq2> vorlon: Separate MP fixing this specific error: https://code.launchpad.net/~tsimonq2/auto-transition/+git/auto-transition/+merge/465981
[16:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: graphviz (noble-proposed/universe) [2.42.2-9build1 => 2.42.2-9ubuntu0.1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)
[16:33] <tsimonq2> LocutusOfBorg: It should work now, yes. Just tested a non-modified run locally with a fresh mirror pull and it works
[16:33] <LocutusOfBorg> tsimonq2, https://git.launchpad.net/~costamagnagianfranco/auto-transition/commit/?id=385e48751d3bd72dab322eb281376fd94866d613 doesn't seem to different from mine
[16:33] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Commit 385e487 in ~costamagnagianfranco/auto-transition "Merge remote-tracking branch 'salsa/master' HEAD master"
[16:34] <LocutusOfBorg> except for one quoting
[16:34] <tsimonq2> LocutusOfBorg: I agree, let's go with yours, where is your MP again? :P
[16:34] <LocutusOfBorg> don't even know why we have a delta from laney here
[16:34] <LocutusOfBorg> tsimonq2, don't know how to open one :D
[16:35] <tsimonq2> LocutusOfBorg: Delta from laney seems to be accounting for -proposed being a partial pocket
[16:35] <tsimonq2> LocutusOfBorg: hmmm just click the button ;D
[16:36] <tsimonq2> vorlon: Anyway, if this merge from upstream is what you were talking about ^^^^ I tested it, it works
[16:38] <LocutusOfBorg> I don't have that button from page https://code.launchpad.net/~costamagnagianfranco/auto-transition/+git/auto-transition
[16:39] <LocutusOfBorg> https://code.launchpad.net/~costamagnagianfranco/auto-transition/+git/auto-transition/+merge/465982
[16:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: graphviz (mantic-proposed/universe) [2.42.2-7build3 => 2.42.2-7ubuntu0.1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)
[16:39] <LocutusOfBorg> I want the "create pull request" in the github way
[16:40] <LocutusOfBorg> tsimonq2, also experimental is a partial pocket?
[16:43] <tsimonq2> LocutusOfBorg: This is true... trying a revert of that commit to see what happens
[16:44] <tsimonq2> hmmm yeah there's a lot packed into that commit, fails :/
[16:49] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: graphviz (jammy-proposed/universe) [2.42.2-6 => 2.42.2-6ubuntu0.1] (i386-whitelist, kubuntu)
[18:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected quickml [source] (noble-proposed) [0.8-1ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>]
[18:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected quickml [source] (mantic-proposed) [0.8-1ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>]
[18:19] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected quickml [source] (jammy-proposed) [0.7-6ubuntu0.1]
[18:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected quickml [source] (focal-proposed) [0.7-5.1ubuntu0.1]
[18:23] <tsimonq2> ubuntu-sru: Hello, just following up to see if we could get Lintian and Vim released today? bug 2064686 bug 2064687
[18:23] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2064686 in lintian (Ubuntu Noble) "Add 'oracular' as a known Ubuntu distribution" [Wishlist, Fix Committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2064686
[18:23] -ubottu:#ubuntu-release- Bug 2064687 in vim (Ubuntu Oracular) "Add Oracular as a known Ubuntu distribution, make Debian and Ubuntu codenames current" [Wishlist, Fix Committed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/2064687
[18:40] <tsimonq2> I gave Ben a facelift, that should go into Oracular soon. Would be good to investigate a backport to Focal, for use in prod
[18:55] <sudip> thanks mfo
[18:58] <LocutusOfBorg> ricotz, libreoffice on armhf looks sad... new upload?
[18:58] <LocutusOfBorg> https://ubuntu-archive-team.ubuntu.com/transitions/html/auto-abseil.html#!good,bad,partial,unknown,!notintesting
[18:58] <LocutusOfBorg> libreoffice	[build logs] (4:24.2.3~rc2-0ubuntu1)	✔	✔	✘		✔	✔	✔
[19:11] <ricotz> LocutusOfBorg, hey, this is fun :(
[19:13] <mfo> sudip, you're welcome. thanks for all your contributions.
[19:13] <ricotz> LocutusOfBorg, this doesnt seem urgent while it will be blocked by qt6 still, there will be a libreoffice 24.2.4 rc1 upload later this week


[14:23] <Eickmeyer> Hey all! When seeding a snap, how does one specify a channel/track? I'm having trouble with a requirement with a gnome-3-28-1804 requrement for a seeded snap in 20.10 not having a fallback.
[14:25] <Eickmeyer> sil2100: ^ (as you probably know my plight with the Ubuntu Studio builds failing)
[14:41] <Eickmeyer> Maybe kenvandine has an idea? ^
[14:45] <Eickmeyer> (Looks like gnome-3-28-1804 is missing a stable/ubuntu-##.## track)
[16:42] <Eickmeyer> Ok... is *anybody* with the Canonical snap team available?
[16:48] <Eickmeyer> Nvm.... I see now that the desktop team owns the snap.
[17:01] <tsimonq2> xnox: https://code.launchpad.net/~tsimonq2/ubiquity/+git/ubiquity/+merge/424979
[17:01] <tsimonq2> xnox: I don't have commit access. That MR had literally existed since I uploaded it. :)
[18:37] <jawn-smith> Is there an archive admin available to nudge a few things to help with my +1 shift?
[19:10] <seb128> jawn-smith, if you just stated what you need maybe, I'm not signing a blank check but might pick up easy things once they are listed
[19:10] <seb128> or said different, don't ask to ask just ask
[19:11] <jawn-smith> golang-mongodb-mongo-driver and golang-step-crypto have binary packages in the NEW queue
[19:11] <jawn-smith> getting them published would help unblock a few other packages that depend on them
[19:13] <seb128> jawn-smith, accepted
[19:13] <jawn-smith> seb128: Thanks!
[19:13] <seb128> np!
[20:05] <jawn-smith> seb128: If you're still around and have the bandwidth could you also have a look at golang-step-cli-utils?
[20:05] <jawn-smith> It just built successfully and now has a binary package in the NEW queue
[20:05] <seb128> jawn-smith, accepted
[20:06] <jawn-smith> Thanks!


[19:33] <thorwil> vish: so i did apply for uds sponsorship. seeing how useless i have been since a while, except for what i did here, i doubt it will happen, though :}
[19:35] <vish> thorwil: yeah... i did it yesterday too.. saw jcastro's blog and only then realized.. timez up!  :)
[19:52] <flan> People can be sponsored for attending UDS?
[19:52]  * flan wishes he'd known. :(
[20:31] <dutchie> flan: you can still apply iirc
[20:32] <dutchie> ah, deadline today
[20:35] <thorwil> flan: assuming they use london time, you still have few hours. doesn't have to take long, though you have to write a bit about yourself that should better be convincing
[23:25] <ChrisWoollard> evening all
[23:26] <daker> hi ChrisWoollard
[23:26] <daker> congrats!!
[23:26] <ChrisWoollard> thanks dakar


[07:10] <ochosi> knome: about the icon themes: if we had known this earlier, we could've pumped up elementary-xfce so much that we don't need gnome at all (in fact i'm not sure we need it really, would be worth some testing)
[07:41] <knome> ochosi, well, we can still do it...
[07:42] <knome> ochosi, but yeah, i suppose we should have looked at it before
[08:12] <elfy> hi noskcaj :)
[08:12] <noskcaj> hey
[08:18] <elfy> to be frank I only ever use the wiki testcases we were told to use - which are a whole lot different than the testcases on the tracker thing
[08:21] <smartboyhw> elfy: Have you ever heard of https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/TestCaseAdmins ? That's the team who writes the testcases in QA Tracker:)
[08:23] <elfy> of course I have - but I don't take much notice
[08:24] <smartboyhw> OH yeah!
[08:24] <smartboyhw> You use the wiki ones:)
[08:25] <Unit193> I actually just use wget -qO- domain.tld/xtest |sh   to tell me what to do. :)
[08:25] <smartboyhw> ;)
[08:26] <Unit193> !pm | smartboyhw
[08:26] <smartboyhw> Unit193: I think that question can be talked in #ubuntu-beginners-team ;) GO there:)
[08:27] <smartboyhw> Sorry btw
[08:27] <Unit193> I have no question, so...
[08:27] <smartboyhw> My question
[08:27] <smartboyhw> I wanna ask you sth
[09:01] <ochosi> knome: ok, so we should ask ppl with vboxes to uninstall the gnome-icon-theme and see what happens :p (i destroyed mine with the ubiquity testing and can't reinstall before the weekend
[09:02] <knome> heh
[09:02] <knome> right
[09:14] <Unit193> Meh, I'll do it after updates.
[09:15] <ochosi> thanks
[09:15] <Unit193> Anyone else getting the gnome-keyring thing again?
[09:16] <Unit193> By standers: evince* gnome-icon-theme* humanity-icon-theme* network-manager-gnome* simple-scan* system-config-printer-gnome*
[09:17] <mr_pouit> yeah, you can't get rid of gnome-icon-theme (only gnome-icon-theme-full if it's installed, but I don't think it is by default)
[09:18] <ochosi> meh
[09:19] <Unit193> It isn't.
[09:43] <ochosi> wth, why can everyone just mess with the bugtracker
[09:43] <ochosi> someone just unlinked bug #1010487 from bug #744283 without explanation/comment
[09:46] <noskcaj> i have to agree with them as they are different
[09:46] <noskcaj> just they have the same solution it seems
[09:51] <Unit193> ochosi: Someone moved a bug I was following from the correct location, to a defunct project that wasn't right, very annoying.
[09:52] <ochosi> yeah, there should be some restrictions at least
[09:52] <ochosi> as in: you have to add a comment if you unlink a bug
[09:54] <smartboyhw> Anyway I marked it again...
[09:55] <smartboyhw> It IS clearly a duplicate as I said yesterday
[09:55] <ochosi> well it doesn't make much sense to go back and forth between marking it as duplicate and unmarking it
[09:56] <ochosi> i'd just wait, the bug should be resolved soon anyway
[09:56]  * ochosi keeps fingers crossed
[09:56] <smartboyhw> Er alright.
[09:56]  * smartboyhw keeps fingers crossed too
[10:38] <knome> pleia2, we need to have lunch/dinner with stgraber at UDS
[10:49] <mips1911> i ran a update this morning and my network no longer works
[10:50] <mips1911> I can't use network manager either as everything is greyed out?
[10:50] <pnarciso> todays update also broke software center
[10:50] <mips1911> you got the same issue?
[10:51] <mips1911> only interface I have listed in ifconfig if lo
[10:51] <mips1911> anyway I can rollback?
[10:54] <pnarciso> I have cable internet, and I wasn't affected
[10:55] <pnarciso> software-center 5.3.11, can you see if it's also installed in your system, and see if it starts?
[10:57] <mips1911> ubuntu software center starts here
[10:58] <pnarciso> is it version 5.3.11
[11:00] <mips1911> no, 5.3.10
[11:01] <pnarciso> it's 5.3.11 that's crashing
[11:01] <pnarciso> previous version worked
[11:02] <pnarciso> but that update will land sooner or later
[11:06] <mips1911> Thing is I can't do anything without network access. So I need to get this fixed somehow
[11:06] <pnarciso> time for reinstall :)
[11:07] <mips1911> no can do
[11:07] <mips1911> I can't see my ethernet interface anymore
[11:08] <mips1911> there must be a way to get it back
[11:12] <pnarciso> do you have network-manager-gnome installed
[11:15] <pnarciso> also, run nm-applet in the terminal and see what it do
[11:37] <mips1911> guys I really need some help with this network issue, can no longer see my eth interface
[11:40] <ochosi> mips1911: i guess #xubuntu would be the right channel for support
[11:40] <mips1911> for 12.10?
[12:06] <ochosi> mips1911: no, for that you could go to #ubuntu+1
[12:15] <mips1911> ochosi: figured it out, somehow my eth interface got renamed to "p17p1" ???
[17:29] <drc> 7 sept daily (64) on a USB stick boots through the new xubuntu splash screen does display (makes me thing of kubuntu with the rings towards the bottom) a "pixelated" black and white diagonal (to left to bottom right) screen and stops.  A <quick> look at the MLs and the ubuntu beta (which has similiar problems for me) release notes show nothing.
[17:30] <drc> I'm assuming it's a problem with the video drivers?  BTW I have a 256MB nVidia GeForce 8400M GS
[17:32] <drc> Is this one of reason that xubuntu decided not to release as a beta?
[17:33] <drc> opps..sorry, just realized this is -devel :(  I'll gladly move this to the main channel.
[17:36] <mips1911> how hard is it to remaster the netinstall image to include extra packages from a current install?
[18:27] <SkippersBoss> evening
[20:05] <noskcaj> if anyone can help improve this tesstcase for the iso tracker can they please edit/fix it
[20:08] <noskcaj> after any changes send a changelog to<EMAIL_ADDRESS>[20:08] <pleia2> noskcaj: the /Short and /Long tests?
[20:09] <pleia2> I'm actually not sure where we are with moving them
[20:09] <noskcaj> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1gZwZLrdmzNiFzR6ho6oSEEdhwmZ5lsc-YCGz0patXYw/edit
[20:09] <pleia2> is that a version of the /Short or /Long?
[20:09] <noskcaj> that is the draft for changes to the iso trackers version of the testcase
[20:10] <pleia2> right, I am trying to figure out which testcase :)
[20:10] <noskcaj> i'm merging parts of the /short and /long testcases of the wiki
[20:10] <pleia2> gotcha
[20:41] <noskcaj> can someone run the xubuntu daily and64 because it seems to have a login loop but it might just be my VM
[20:42] <pleia2> I am not having that problem
[20:42] <pleia2> did both VM and hardware installs, 64 and 32-bit
[20:44] <noskcaj> was your VM qemu
[20:45] <pleia2> no, virtualbox
[20:48] <noskcaj> then qemu is to blame
[20:49] <pleia2> wow, my menu on my hardware system is some kind of asian language
[20:49] <pleia2> it wasn't online when I did the install
[20:56] <pleia2> ah, I see what I did
[20:57] <pleia2> PEBKAC
[20:58] <noskcaj> pleia2: did you choose manual login?
[20:58] <pleia2> it was manual login, I didn't log in with default english ;)
[20:58] <pleia2> did you do auto login?
[21:01] <noskcaj> manual, in english
[21:02] <noskcaj> i'm seeing if virtual box makes it work for me
[21:41] <noskcaj> the auto-login in virtualbox works fine, does that meen its a bug in qemu?
[21:47] <Sysi> could be
[21:47] <Sysi> noskcaj: try removing ~/.ICEauthority
[21:48] <noskcaj> i dont have that folder
[21:52] <Sysi> I think it's single file, can still be missing though
[21:59] <noskcaj> yes it was, i have now deleted it