# High brightness fully coherent X-ray amplifier seeded by a free-electron
laser oscillator

Kai Li1,2 Jiawei Yan1,2 Chao Feng1 Meng Zhang1 Haixiao Deng1,
<EMAIL_ADDRESS>1Shanghai Institute of Applied Physics, Chinese
Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201800, China
2University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China.

###### Abstract

X-ray free-electron laser oscillator (XFELO) is expected to be a cutting edge
tool for fully coherent X-ray laser generation, and undulator taper technique
is well-known for considerably increasing the efficiency of free-electron
lasers (FELs). In order to combine the advantages of these two schemes, FEL
amplifier seeded by XFELO is proposed by simply using a chirped electron beam.
With the right choice of the beam parameters, the bunch tail is within the
gain bandwidth of XFELO, and lase to saturation, which will be served as a
seeding for further amplification. Meanwhile, the bunch head which is outside
the gain bandwidth of XFELO, is preserved and used in the following FEL
amplifier. It is found that the natural “double-horn” beam current as well as
residual energy chirp from chicane compressor are quite suitable for the new
scheme. Inheriting the advantages from XFELO seeding and undulator tapering,
it is feasible to generate nearly terawatt level, fully coherent X-ray pulses
with unprecedented shot-to-shot stability, which might open up new scientific
opportunities in various research fields.

PACS numbers

41.60.Cr

###### pacs:

Valid PACS appear here

††preprint: APS/123-QED

##  I Introduction

The successful operation of self-amplified spontaneous emission (SASE)
Kondratenko and Saldin (1980); Bonifacio  _et al._ (1984) X-ray free electron
lasers (XFEL) Emma  _et al._ (2010); Pile (2011); Kang  _et al._ (2013);
Altarelli  _et al._ (2006) around the world offer innovative approach for
studying various objects such as nonlinear spectroscopy, diffraction before
destruction, time-resolved pump-probe dynamics and coherent scattering Bostedt
_et al._ (2016). Starting from initial electron beam density distribution shot
noise, SASE is able to produce spatially coherent short wavelength radiation
pulse with GW level peak power and around 100 fs pulse duration. In order to
increase the resolution of X-ray imaging experiments Chapman  _et al._ (2011);
Seibert  _et al._ (2011), one major goal for the future XFEL is to further
enhance peak power and photon flux. Sustainable energy extraction from
electron beam to radiation field is guaranteed by resonant condition in FEL
process. Saturation occurs for normal planar undulator when electron beams
loss too much energy and drop out of resonance with wave. To further extract
energy and increase radiation peak power to TW level, the resonant condition
should be preserved and undulator parameters ought to be precisely optimized
to compensate the electron beam energy loss Kroll  _et al._ (1981). Lots of
efforts have been made to improve the energy extraction efficiency in the last
decades Schneidmiller and Yurkov (2015); Jiao  _et al._ (2012), and the
tapering technique has proved to be feasible to improve energy extraction
efficiency in long wavelength regions, i.e., microwave radiation and visible
light regime Orzechowski  _et al._ (1986); Wang  _et al._ (2009). However, it
is predicted that tapered undulator technique is sensitive to shot-to-shot
fluctuation and poor temporal coherence of SASE Huang and Stupakov (2005);
Saldin  _et al._ (2006), thus effectively enhancing XFEL output power by
tapered undulator is still challenging.

Improving the longitudinal coherence of X-ray FEL is of great interest ever
since the first light of Linac Coherent Light Source. Modifications to SASE,
e.g., self-seeding Geloni  _et al._ (2011); Amann  _et al._ (2012) and
slippage-boosted methods Xiang  _et al._ (2013); McNeil  _et al._ (2013); Wu
_et al._ (2012), have been proposed to achieve this goal. Self-seeding takes
advantages of monochromator to obtain a coherent seed from SASE which is
amplified in downstream undulator. Although self-seeding has been successfully
demonstrated to improve the longitudinal coherence, the intrinsic fluctuation
of purified seeding is a great challenge. Other methods of increasing the
coherent length by speeding up the slippage in undulators, however, will still
suffer from large shot-to-shot fluctuations. In addition, for external-seeding
technique Yu (1991); Stupakov (2009); Deng and Feng (2013a), the preservation
of temporal coherence and operation stability are still not clear in hard
X-ray region. These shortcomings of previous methods are the obstacles to
further enhance photon flux by tapering technique.

In order to further improve the XFEL performances by undulator tapering,
according to the conventional oscillator-amplifier configuration in laser
community, a robust X-ray source which served as a seed is crucial. It is
straightforward to take X-ray FEL oscillator (XFELO) output as a high
qualified stable seed source and to be amplified in the following FEL
amplifier Deng and Feng (2013b). Utilizing relativistic electron beam as gain
medium and crystals as optical cavity mirrors, XFELO starts from spontaneous
radiation and generates stable, high repetition rate, fully coherent X-ray
pulses, which are promising candidates for seeding FEL Kim  _et al._ (2008);
Dai  _et al._ (2012). In this paper, a novel and simple FEL amplifier seeded
by XFELO is proposed by using a chirped electron beam. In this scheme, with
the right choice of the beam parameters, only the bunch tail lases inside the
XFELO. After over energy modulation by X-ray pulse in the cavity, the
degenerate electron beam passes through a chicane delay, and then the bunch
head overlaps with the output XFELO pulse in the following FEL amplifier with
tapered undulators, where more power is drawn from the electron beam,
substantially increases the photon flux. The stable coherent seeds from
oscillator ensure high efficiency of tapering technique, and according to the
simulation results, nearly terawatt level, ultrahigh brightness, highly stable
X-ray pulses can be delivered, which is an ideal light source for scientific
users.

Using the parameters of Shanghai Coherent Light Facility (SCLF) as an example
Li and Deng (2017), we show that XFELO seeded amplifier is able to
significantly enhance FEL peak power, spectral brightness as well as output
power stability. It is believed this scheme, which is similar to conventional
laser configurations, is quite potential for many future XFEL user facilities.
This paper is organized as following: the principles of our scheme is
presented in Sec. II. The simulation results at 5 keV photon energy using a 3
kA flat-top electron beam is illustrated in Sec. III. The start-to-end
simulations on the basis of SCLF are discussed in Sec. IV and the output power
stability analysis is shown in Sec. V. Finally, a brief conclusion is given in
Sec. VI.

##  II The principles description

Unlike conventional lasers whose wavelength is limited by the energy levels of
gain materials, XFELO extracts power from relativistic electron beam, thus the
output photon energy is unbounded theoretically. Taking advantages of high
Bragg reflection crystals demonstrated recently Shvyd’Ko  _et al._ (2010), the
X-ray radiation, which starts from spontaneous radiation, is trapped inside
the resonator and oscillates back and forth. During each round trip, X-ray
pulse overlaps with electron beam and obtains energy insides the undulator. In
order to ensure the growth of light power, undulator should be long enough to
maintain sufficient single pass gain, i.e.

$R(1+G)>1,$ (1)

where $R$ is the total reflectivity of the crystal mirrors, and $G$ is the
single pass gain. The X-ray radiation is amplified over and over again and
experiences exponential growth until saturation. In the saturation regime,
electron bunch is over modulated by the high power X-ray which leads to gain
degradation. When the round trip net gain equals to one, the XFELO reaches
equilibrium and produces stable output X-ray pulses.

Similar to traditional laser, with carefully optimized electron beam quality,
undulator length and cavity output coupling, XFELO is able to deliver stable,
high repetition rate, fully coherent X-ray pulses Li  _et al._ (2017);
Lindberg  _et al._ (2011). The peak power is typically several MW for low peak
current electron beam ($\thicksim$10A) in the early XFELO proposals Kim  _et
al._ (2008); Dai  _et al._ (2012); Lindberg  _et al._ (2011); Borland  _et
al._ (2007), and due to the narrow spectral acceptance of the Bragg crystal
Shvyd’ko and Lindberg (2012), typically tens of meV, the average brightness
for XFELO output is predicted to be 2 orders of magnitudes higher than SASE.
With the development of superconducting accelerator technology, several kA
peak current Linac-based high repetition rate X-ray FELs are under
construction Pierini  _et al._ (2017); Burrill  _et al._ (2017), which is
suitable for high current XFELO operation. For a typical FEL oscillator, the
maximum fractional energy extracted from electron beam is inverse proportion
to $1/N_{u}$, where $N_{u}$ is the number of undulator periods. For a given
single pass gain, high peak current means short undulator length, which is
expected to generate X-ray pulse with peak power nearly GW level. For further
enhancing the peak power, Fig. 1 shows the schematic diagram of high peak
current XFELO supplies a seed laser for subsequent tapered FEL amplifier. A
chicane is applied to displace the electron beam horizontally to bypass the
crystal mirror and to match the delay of X-ray pulse by crystal. The details
of configuration and properties are investigated in the following.

Figure 1: The schematic of XFELO seeded FEL.

###  II.1 The drawbacks of cavity detune

Since a high peak power FEL amplifier is pursued, only high peak current
electron beam is considered in this paper. In addition, large amount of
electrons may drop out of the “ponderomotive bucket” after interactions with
intense X-ray electromagnetic field in the cavity, which will degrade the
tapered FEL efficiency. Thus the beam energy spread degradation in the
previous XFELO must be avoid, and the faint X-ray pulse inside the cavity is
preferred as long as it dominates over the electron beam spontaneous
radiation. For example, an XFELO output with few MW peak power is sufficient
as a seeding to overcome the shot noise from a typical 1 kA peak current beam.
To control the XFELO power at a certain level, the simple and straightforward
options are fine tuning of X-ray cavity, e.g., by increasing the output
coupling ratio or by detuning the cavity length.

Figure 2: A typical 1 kA peak current XFELO output peak power and saturation
round trip number as a function of cavity output coupling. Figure 3: The XFELO
output peak power at different cavity detune.

According to the simulation results, however, aforementioned two approaches
are proved to be infeasible. As the output coupling rises, the decline of net
reflectivity causes dissatisfactory of Eq. (1), and the XFELO output peak
power decreases rapidly. The steep fall indicates that generating MW level
X-ray signal as a seeding pulse by increasing cavity output coupling is
unpractical. Since the peak power would either remains shot noise or grows to
GW level, it is hard to operate at an unstable status. Note that changing
mirrors reflectivity finely by varying crystal thickness is challenging in
practical. The round trips required for XFELO saturation is also plotted in
Fig. 2, which shows that much more oscillation passes are required to reach an
equilibrium status around the critical output coupling. The fine detuning of
the cavity length is also infeasible, according to Fig. 3, due to the
dramatically growth and decline of output peak power from the optimum
synchronization. In order to obtain and maintain a suitable MW output peak
power, cavity length control system with nm resolution is required. And any
jitter and vibration of cavity mirrors will lead large output power
fluctuation and undermines the following tapered FEL amplifier.

###  II.2 The chirped-beam XFELO

According to the previous results and discussions, the alternative strategies
of using XFELO output as a seeding is the subsequent FEL amplifier would be
using twin bunch lasing Qin  _et al._ (2017) or recently developed fresh-slice
technique Lutman  _et al._ (2016), which however require relatively
complicated machine setup and additional accelerator hardware components. In
this paper, however, a simpler chirped-beam XFELO scheme is proposed for
preserving energy spread of part of electron beam while getting enough seed
radiation from the other part. Schematic for optimization of a 3 kA peak
current chirped-beam for XFELO is demonstrated in Fig. 4. Assuming that single
pass gain of 50% is needed for compensating round trip loss and output
coupling. In order to guarantee only the bunch tail lases in XFELO, the
electron energy of the beam center is set corresponding to 50% single pass
gain, while the 1/4 point at the bunch tail obtains the maximum single pass
gain. Thus the optimized electron energy chirp is，

$\alpha=\frac{\Delta\gamma/\gamma_{0}}{\Delta
l/L_{b}}=4~{}\frac{\gamma_{1/2}-\gamma_{1/4}}{\gamma_{0}},$ (2)

where $\gamma_{0}$ is the resonant electron energy measured in rest mass
units, $L_{b}$ is the length of electron beam and $\Delta l$ is the length
deviation corresponding to $\Delta\gamma$ energy detune, and $\gamma_{1/4}$,
$\gamma_{1/2}$ represent the electron energy at the 1/4 and 1/2 points. Note
that an electron beam with both positive chirp (blue ellipse) and negative
chirp (pink ellipse) can be used for the XFELO seeded FEL amplifier. The
effect of linear chirp on FEL gain is equivalent to the linear tapered
undulator, and thus the beam energy chirp could be compensated with the linear
undulator taper and thus optimize the following amplification.

Figure 4: The schematic of 3 kA peak current XFELO single pass gain (red solid
line) and optimized chirped-beam. Assuming that 50% gain is necessary, and the
$1/4$ bunch tail point corresponds to the maximum single pass gain, while the
central point relates to 50% single pass gain. Thus only bunch tail gets
enough gain to compensate the round trip net loss, while bunch head does not
lase inside the XFELO. The blue and pink ellipses represent the positive and
negative chirped-beam, respectively.

###  II.3 Tapered FEL amplifier

Tapered undulator technique is well-known for the capability of maintain
resonant condition after FEL saturation, thus improving the energy extraction
efficiency. In practice, however, it is hard to generate ultra-high peak power
X-ray pulses as estimated by simulations. As far as we know, one of the main
reasons is lack of suitable seed radiation from previous undulators.

On the one hand, SASE starts from electron initial random density
fluctuations, and is known to possess poorly longitudinal coherence, thus
unstable generation of parasitic radiation with different frequency from the
signal would occur Kroll  _et al._ (1981), which causes the degeneration of
tapered amplifier performance. On the other hand, self-seeding scheme is able
to generate X-ray pulses with narrow bandwidth, however, nearly twice as much
as undulator periods are required comparing to SASE, and more undulators might
be necessary for further improving the pulse energy by tapering technique. In
addition, the narrow acceptance of Bragg crystal diffraction for a broad
bandwidth SASE from upstream undulators leads to large shot-to-shot self-
seeding pulse energy fluctuations, and matching the tapered undulators
configurations for each individual shot is impossible, thus leads to even
larger output pulse energy fluctuations. Furthermore, the relatively small
seed signal after self-seeding, which means small “ponderomotive bucket”
height, combines with large energy spread might cause portions of electron
escaping from bucket and further degradation of tapered FEL amplifier.

Figure 5: The performance of 3 kA peak current flat-top electron beam for
XFELO with 18% crystal mirror output coupling, and for tapered FEL amplifier.
The top row of panel shows (a) output pulse energy, (b) power profile (red
solid line) and beam energy spread (green dashed line), (c) spectrum for
XFELO, while the bottom row of panel (d),(e) and (f) display the corresponding
results for tapered FEL amplifier.

Figure 6: The electrons distribution in phase space (a) and the corresponding
current profile (b).

For the chirped-beam XFELO seeded FEL proposed in this paper, a fully
coherent, high peak power stable X-ray seed radiation from XFELO is benefit
for the following tapered amplifier. And the degenerate portions of lasing
electron beam is replaced by another fresh parts of bunch, thus ensures a
small energy spread. To eliminate the influence of phase mismatching of
tapered FEL amplifier, the undulators without break sections are employed in
simulations. The time-dependent results in the following sections proved that
it is feasible to generate high brightness X-ray pulses with considerable
stability.

##  III Time-dependent Simulation

To illustrate the main principles of XFELO seeded FEL, the normal parameters
of SCLF are employed. SCLF is the first hard X-ray FEL facility in China which
is now under conceptual design, and the major parameters of electron beam and
undulators are summarized in Table. 1. SCLF takes advantages of
superconducting accelerator technique which is capable of delivering nearly 1
MHz high repetition rate relativistic electron bunches. The combination of
high brightness electron beam and 200 m length undulators are suitable for
XFELO seeded FEL amplifier. The simulations are specially carried out at 5 keV
X-ray photons, due to the production of high peak power and short temporal
duration FEL radiation at that wavelength is of great interests for single-
particle imaging and coherent diffraction imaging experiments.

Table 1: The main parameters of SCLF. Parameter | Value | Unit
---|---|---
Beam energy | 8 | GeV
Slice relative energy spread | 0.01 | %
Normalized emittance | 0.4 |  $\mu$m-rad
Repetition rate | 1 | MHz
Peak current | 3 | kA
Bunch charge | 100 | pC
Undulator period | 26 | mm
Total undulator length | 200 | m

For the benefits of improving tapering efficiency, high intensity ($\sim$3 kA)
flat-top current with bunch charge equals to 100 pC electron beam is used. The
short electron bunch temporal duration corresponds to a broad spectral
bandwidth (especially for XFELO seeded FEL in which only half of electron beam
is lasing), and in order to avoid excessive cavity loss due to crystal mirror
narrow bandwidth acceptance Shvyd’ko and Lindberg (2012), the (1 1 1) atom
plane of diamond crystal with incident angle $\theta=36.9^{\circ}$ is chosen
to obtain a 324 meV Darwin bandwidth. A 300 m round trip length optical cavity
and one module of undulator with 200 periods is used for matching the electron
beam repetition rate and providing enough XFELO single pass gain.

The performances of XFELO seeded FEL are simulated by the combination of
GENESIS Reiche (1999) and OPC van der Slot  _et al._ (2009). The evolution of
XFELO radiation pulse energy is shown in Fig. 5(a), which experiences an
exponential growth as expected and generates 206 $\mu$J X-ray in the
saturation regime. With the optimized electron energy chirp $\alpha=6.1\times
10^{-3}$, only the bunch tail, which provides enough FEL gain, contributes to
effective FEL interaction as well as induced significant energy spread
enhancement. Due to the spectral purification of crystal mirror Bragg
diffraction, the output spectral bandwidth is 212.5 meV (FWHM).

Figure 7: The performance of real electron beam for XFELO with the 33% crystal
mirror output coupling, and for tapered FEL amplifier. The top row of panel
shows (a) output pulse energy, (b) power profile (red solid line) and beam
energy spread (green dashed line), (c) spectrum for XFELO, while the bottom
row of panel (d), (e), (f) display the corresponding results for tapered FEL
amplifier.

As aforementioned, a chicane bypass is adjusted to provide proper delay to let
the bunch head overlaps with the XFELO radiation and to wash out the XFELO-
induced microbunching. Quadratic tapering model is chosen and carefully
optimized to obtain maximum pulse energy for subsequent nearly 180 m length
tapered FEL amplifier. The second row of the panel shows that the amplifier is
able to generate 7.9 mJ pulse energy with 0.92 TW peak power, 586 meV (FWHM)
spectral bandwidth and 14 fs (FWHM) pulse duration. This corresponds to a
time-bandwidth product of 2, which is larger than the value of Fourier
transform limit (0.44) for Gaussian pulse profile and is mainly due to the
chirped electron beam we used.

##  IV Start-to-end simulation of SCLF

Figure 8: The output radiation of (a) XFELO and (b) tapered FEL amplifier. The
gray lines refer to 100 runs with $10^{-4}$ rms beam energy jitter, and red
line is the average value. Subfigure (c) shows the rms of output energy with
different rms beam energy jitter.

The performances of XFELO seeded FEL are investigated by start-to-end
simulations of SCLF. The electron beam dynamics simulation in the photon-
injector is carried out by ASTRA Flöttmann  _et al._ (2011) with space charge
effects taken into account. ELEGANT Borland (2000) is then used for simulation
in the reminder of Linac. For pursuing shorter gain length of SASE FEL, the
electrons are accelerated off-crest in the superconducting Linac and possess
large energy chirp, then the bunch is compressed longitudinally inside a
chicane compressor to obtain high peak current. In order to achieve high
efficient lasing of high-gain FELs, the residual energy chirp compensation is
of paramount importance and several techniques are available for reaching this
goal, i.e., off-crest dechirping and passively dechirping through Linac cavity
wakefield. For SCLF using low-frequency superconducting technology, however,
the wakefield is too weak to remove the residual chirp, and actively
dechirping by running the beam off-crest in a Linac is an inefficient and
costly option. Thus SCLF takes advantages of an inexpensive 12 m length
corrugated pipe as a beam dechirper Bane and Stupakov (2012); Antipov  _et
al._ (2012); Deng  _et al._ (2014).

In this paper, however, the introduced chirp is used for XFELO seeded FEL
operation strictly without further chirp removal devices. The phase space
electrons distribution (a) and the corresponding current profile (b) are
presented in Fig. 6. For a given chirp $\alpha=1.3\times 10^{-3}$, using the
strategies mentioned above, the thickness of diamond crystal is adjusted to
obtain 33% output coupling for single segment undulator XFELO simulations. The
natural “double-horn” of electron beam is proved to be quite suitable for our
scheme, since one horn is lasing inside the XFELO while the other is well-
preserved for lasing in FEL amplifier. The energy chirp required is for the
head horn to be outside the gain bandwidth while the tail horn corresponding
to maximum single pass gain, and the influence of small current between them
could be ignored, thus leads to relative small optimized energy chirp. In
addition, the large energy spread of the “double horn” current is not as
harmful to XFELO seeded FEL as self-seeding scheme, since neither the XFELO,
which works in the small signal regime, nor the tapered FEL amplifier is
sensitive to electron beam energy spread.

The simulation results of XFELO and tapered FEL amplifier for 5 keV photons
are shown in the upper and bottom row of Fig. 7, which demonstrate that the
tail horn produces a nearly 190 $\mu$J, 14.5 GW XFELO output, with 0.3 eV
(FWHM) spectral bandwidth. The energy spread corresponding to the bunch tail
increases, while the bunch head remains unchanged. The XFELO output is
amplified to 3.8 mJ, 0.55 TW, with 0.66 eV (FWHM) spectral bandwidth and 5.5
fs (FWHM) temporal duration. This corresponds to a time-bandwidth product of
0.88, which is twice the value of Fourier transform limit (0.44) for Gaussian
pulse profile. Due to the relatively small bunch energy chirp as well as short
radiation duration, the output pulse longitudinal coherence is better than the
flat-top current case mentioned above. XFELO seeded FEL is able to generate 5
keV X-ray photons with $3.35\times
10^{35}\,(photons/s/mm^{2}/mrad^{2}/0.1\%BW)$ peak brilliance, which is two
order of magnitude larger than SASE FEL brilliance $1.1\times
10^{33}\,(photons/s/mm^{2}/mrad^{2}/0.1\%BW)$ produced by the same electron
and undulator parameters.

##  V Output energy stability

To illustrate the stability of XFELO seeded FEL in real machine, 100 start-to-
end runs are carried out for each electron beam energy jitter rms value. The
results of XFELO (a) and tapered amplifier (b) with rms equals to $10^{-4}$
are shown in Fig. 8. The gray lines refer to 100 runs and the red line is the
average value of them. The results are summarized in Fig. 8(c), which
indicates that with the normal $10^{-4}$ rms beam energy jitter in SCLF, XFELO
seeded FEL is able to generate high brightness X-ray pulse with fluctuations
as low as 3%. Note that the final output is more resistant to bunch energy
jitter than XFELO, further analysis reveals that this is due to the relatively
broader gain bandwidth of tapered FEL amplifier in respect XFELO in our
simulations.

##  VI Conclusion

The chirped-beam XFELO seeded FEL is a novel strategy to generate high pulse
energy, fully coherent X-ray beam. The XFELO output provides a fully coherent,
high power, stable seed radiation, which means a favorable “bucket” to trap
electrons in phase space and to maintain consistent energy extraction in
tapered FEL amplifier. The chirped beam is optimized for ensuring the bunch
tail lases effectively in XFELO while the bunch head is preserved for
following tapered FEL amplifier. It is demonstrated that with optimized
parameters, the new scheme is able to generate a few mJ, TW level fully
coherent 5 keV X-ray radiation.

Taking advantages of the natural remnant energy chirp after chicane
compressor, a start-to-end simulation is conducted using the basic parameters
in SCLF. The “double horn” current is proved to be suitable for XFELO seeded
FEL operation. Simulation results demonstrate that the new scheme is able to
generate 3.8 mJ pulse energy, 0.55 TW peak power, 5 keV photon energy X-ray
pulses whose peak brilliance is two order of magnitude larger than SASE FEL.
In addition, XFELO seeded FEL output is quite stable, rms pulse energy
fluctuation is as small as 3% for a typical $10^{-4}$ rms electron beam energy
jitter. The ideal X-ray light source is expected to be valuable for some
special experiments, i.e., X-ray single-shot diffraction imaging and coherent
scattering techniques, which require high spectral brightness. The following
work would be to analyze the influence of bandwidth of seeding radiation on
its performances as well as the gain bandwidth of tapered FEL amplifier.

###### Acknowledgements.

The author would like to thank B. Liu, D. Wang and Z. Zhao for helpful
discussions on SCLF project; T. Liu for enthusiastic discussions on FEL
tapering physics. This work was partially supported by the National Natural
Science Foundation of China (11775293) and Ten Thousand Talent Program.

## References

  * Kondratenko and Saldin (1980) A. Kondratenko and E. Saldin, Part. Accel. 10, 207 (1980).
  * Bonifacio  _et al._ (1984) R. Bonifacio, C. Pellegrini, and L. Narducci, Optics Communications 50, 373 (1984).
  * Emma  _et al._ (2010) P. Emma, R. Akre, J. Arthur, R. Bionta, C. Bostedt, J. Bozek, A. Brachmann, P. Bucksbaum, R. Coffee, F.-J. Decker, _et al._ , Nature Photonics 4, 641 (2010).
  * Pile (2011) D. Pile, Nature Photonics 5, 456 (2011).
  * Kang  _et al._ (2013) H.-S. Kang, K.-W. Kim, and I. S. Ko, in  _Proceedings of 4th International Particle Accelerator Conference_ (JACOW, Shanghai, China, 2013) p. 2074.
  * Altarelli  _et al._ (2006) M. Altarelli, R. Brinkmann, M. Chergui, W. Decking, B. Dobson, S. Düsterer, G. Grübel, W. Graeff, H. Graafsma, J. Hajdu, _et al._ , Technical Design Report, DESY 97, 1 (2006).
  * Bostedt  _et al._ (2016) C. Bostedt, S. Boutet, D. M. Fritz, Z. Huang, H. J. Lee, H. T. Lemke, A. Robert, W. F. Schlotter, J. J. Turner, and G. J. Williams, Reviews of Modern Physics 88, 015007 (2016).
  * Chapman  _et al._ (2011) H. N. Chapman, P. Fromme, A. Barty, T. A. White, R. A. Kirian, A. Aquila, M. S. Hunter, J. Schulz, D. P. DePonte, U. Weierstall, _et al._ , Nature 470, 73 (2011).
  * Seibert  _et al._ (2011) M. M. Seibert, T. Ekeberg, F. R. Maia, M. Svenda, J. Andreasson, O. Jönsson, D. Odić, B. Iwan, A. Rocker, D. Westphal, _et al._ , Nature 470, 78 (2011).
  * Kroll  _et al._ (1981) N. Kroll, P. Morton, and M. Rosenbluth, IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics 17, 1436 (1981).
  * Schneidmiller and Yurkov (2015) E. A. Schneidmiller and M. Yurkov, Physical Review Special Topics-Accelerators and Beams 18, 030705 (2015).
  * Jiao  _et al._ (2012) Y. Jiao, J. Wu, Y. Cai, A. Chao, W. Fawley, J. Frisch, Z. Huang, H.-D. Nuhn, C. Pellegrini, and S. Reiche, Physical Review Special Topics-Accelerators and Beams 15, 050704 (2012).
  * Orzechowski  _et al._ (1986) T. J. Orzechowski, B. Anderson, J. C. Clark, W. M. Fawley, A. C. Paul, D. Prosnitz, E. T. Scharlemann, S. M. Yarema, D. B. Hopkins, A. M. Sessler, _et al._ , Physical Review Letters 57, 2172 (1986).
  * Wang  _et al._ (2009) X. Wang, H. Freund, D. Harder, W. Miner Jr, J. Murphy, H. Qian, Y. Shen, and X. Yang, Physical Review Letters 103, 154801 (2009).
  * Huang and Stupakov (2005) Z. Huang and G. Stupakov, Physical Review Special Topics-Accelerators and Beams 8, 040702 (2005).
  * Saldin  _et al._ (2006) E. L. Saldin, E. A. Schneidmiller, and M. V. Yurkov, Physical Review Special Topics-Accelerators and Beams 9, 050702 (2006).
  * Geloni  _et al._ (2011) G. Geloni, V. Kocharyan, and E. Saldin, Journal of Modern Optics 58, 1391 (2011).
  * Amann  _et al._ (2012) J. Amann, W. Berg, V. Blank, F.-J. Decker, Y. Ding, P. Emma, Y. Feng, J. Frisch, D. Fritz, J. Hastings, _et al._ , Nature Photonics 6, 693 (2012).
  * Xiang  _et al._ (2013) D. Xiang, Y. Ding, Z. Huang, and H. Deng, Physical Review Special Topics-Accelerators and Beams 16, 010703 (2013).
  * McNeil  _et al._ (2013) B. McNeil, N. Thompson, and D. Dunning, Physical Review Letters 110, 134802 (2013).
  * Wu  _et al._ (2012) J. Wu, A. Marinelli, and C. Pellegrini, in  _Proceedings of the 34th International Free Electron Laser Conference_ (JACOW, Nara, Japan, 2012) p. 237.
  * Yu (1991) L. H. Yu, Physical Review A 44, 5178 (1991).
  * Stupakov (2009) G. Stupakov, Physical Review Letters 102, 074801 (2009).
  * Deng and Feng (2013a) H. Deng and C. Feng, Physical Review Letters 111, 084801 (2013a).
  * Deng and Feng (2013b) H. Deng and C. Feng, in  _Proceedings of the 4th International Particle Accelerator Conference_ (JACOW, Shanghai, China, 2013) p. 1214.
  * Kim  _et al._ (2008) K.-J. Kim, Y. Shvyd’ko, and S. Reiche, Physical Review Letters 100, 244802 (2008).
  * Dai  _et al._ (2012) J. Dai, H. Deng, and Z. Dai, Physical Review Letters 108, 034802 (2012).
  * Li and Deng (2017) K. Li and H. Deng, arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.06338 (2017).
  * Shvyd’Ko  _et al._ (2010) Y. V. Shvyd’Ko, S. Stoupin, A. Cunsolo, A. H. Said, and X. Huang, Nature Physics 6, 196 (2010).
  * Li  _et al._ (2017) K. Li, M. Song, and H. Deng, Physical Review Special Topics-Accelerators and Beams 20, 030702 (2017).
  * Lindberg  _et al._ (2011) R. Lindberg, K.-J. Kim, Y. Shvyd’ko, and W. Fawley, Physical Review Special Topics-Accelerators and Beams 14, 010701 (2011).
  * Borland  _et al._ (2007) M. Borland, G. Decker, A. Nassiri, and A. White, in  _Proceedings of Particle Accelerator Conference 07_ (IEEE, Albuquerque, NM USA, 2007) p. 1121.
  * Shvyd’ko and Lindberg (2012) Y. Shvyd’ko and R. Lindberg, Physical Review Special Topics-Accelerators and Beams 15, 100702 (2012).
  * Pierini  _et al._ (2017) P. Pierini, M. Bertucci, A. Bosotti, J. Chen, C. Maiano, P. Michelato, L. Monaco, M. Moretti, C. Pagani, R. Paparella, _et al._ , Physical Review Special Topics-Accelerators and Beams 20, 042006 (2017).
  * Burrill  _et al._ (2017) A. Burrill, K. Davis, D. Gonnella, A. Grassellino, O. Melnychuk, A. Palczewski, M. Ross, and L. Zhao, in  _Proceedings of 8th International Particle Accelerator Conference_ (JACOW, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2017) p. 1152.
  * Qin  _et al._ (2017) W. Qin, K.-J. Kim, R. Lindberg, and J. Wu, in  _Proceedings of 38th International Free Electron Laser Conference_ (JACOW, Santa Fe, NM USA, 2017).
  * Lutman  _et al._ (2016) A. A. Lutman, T. J. Maxwell, J. P. MacArthur, M. W. Guetg, N. Berrah, R. N. Coffee, Y. Ding, Z. Huang, A. Marinelli, S. Moeller, _et al._ , Nature Photonics 10, 745 (2016).
  * Reiche (1999) S. Reiche, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 429, 243 (1999).
  * van der Slot  _et al._ (2009) P. J. van der Slot, H. Freund, W. Miner Jr, S. Benson, M. Shinn, and K.-J. Boller, Physical Review Letters 102, 244802 (2009).
  * Flöttmann  _et al._ (2011) K. Flöttmann _et al._ , Manual, Version 3, 2014 (2011).
  * Borland (2000) M. Borland, LS-287 (2000).
  * Bane and Stupakov (2012) K. Bane and G. Stupakov, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 690, 106 (2012).
  * Antipov  _et al._ (2012) S. Antipov, C. Jing, M. Fedurin, W. Gai, A. Kanareykin, K. Kusche, P. Schoessow, V. Yakimenko, and A. Zholents, Physical Review Letters 108, 144801 (2012).
  * Deng  _et al._ (2014) H. Deng, M. Zhang, C. Feng, T. Zhang, X. Wang, T. Lan, L. Feng, W. Zhang, X. Liu, H. Yao, _et al._ , Physical Review Letters 113, 254802 (2014).