 If you decide otherwise let me know and we'll remove Lubuntu.
[10:18] <phillw> flexiondotorg: yes we are
[10:20] <flexiondotorg> Thanks phillw
[10:21] <phillw> flexiondotorg: to save any confusion, lubuntu does all the pre-release milestones :)
[10:21] <flexiondotorg> phillw, OK, if I do this again I will just assume Lubuntu are taking part.
[10:21] <flexiondotorg> Can someone from Lubuntu update the wiki please? https://wiki.ubuntu.com/WilyWerewolf/Beta1
[10:23] <phillw> flexiondotorg: as soon as the notes are ready :)
[10:29] <phillw> flexiondotorg: done
[10:30] <flexiondotorg> phillw, Great. Thank you.
[11:39] <phillw> Beta 1 spins are now available.
[15:31] <sakang> anyone using the lxqt ppa?  the appearance is not working and desktop missing in the lxqt config
[15:33] <sakang> this on wily, lxqt 0.9
[15:37] <sakang> just noticed lxqt-common has 15.04.1 suffix while everything is 15.10?
[15:37] <sakang> and it's version 0.9.1
[17:48] <wxl> flexiondotorg: sorry. email follows me where i go but not irc. yep, we're on
[17:59] <phillw> wxl: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/WilyWerewolf/Beta1/Lubuntu will need updating with what ever bugs we're carrying forward
[18:01] <wxl> phillw: yes dear. :) thank you very much for all your help
[18:04] <phillw> hey, I was lurking :P
[18:13]  * ianorlin grabs desktopamd64 for live session
[18:50] <phillw> wxl: any ideas on the latest twist with double / not double / not appearing at all applets?
[18:51] <wxl> phillw: yeah i don't know. that's some weird stuff, for sure.
[18:51] <phillw> it is when same iso exhibits different behaviour!
[18:52] <ianorlinlive> I have not produced a bug but it is quite confusing
[18:52] <wxl> that just doesn't make any bloody sense
[18:52] <ianorlinlive> ok only one nm-applet is running I found out through pgrep
[18:53] <phillw> i still have two network and two skype applets on my production wily... which is down from the 4 i had last Friday!
[18:53] <ianorlinlive> also the new applet is actually the fcitx input method
[18:53] <ianorlinlive> ok I may have found a workaround
[18:53] <phillw> ianorlinlive: i was debating killing that, as I still have dbus
[18:54] <phillw> which... has started to fall out again... not got a full bug report on it as yet.
[18:54] <ianorlinlive> ok this makes no sense as right clicking indicator applet settings and pressing show indicators and then start it back again gets one
[18:55] <ianorlinlive> also lubuntu software center has a wierd ui typo but not sure this will be fixed when clicking on info for a package it says infos on $package
[18:59] <phillw> ianorlinlive: wxl the lsc bug for alternate has a proposed work around, that I'll test out. It would be a lot of effort to try and trap the instance that is causing the issue in LSC with alternate.
[19:00] <ianorlinlive> phillw I think there are several actually
[19:00] <phillw> ianorlinlive: if it is a type, let jorn know that's a quick fix :)
[19:00] <phillw> Typo
[19:00] <ianorlinlive> yeah I could probably do this myself even
[19:01] <phillw> yeah, and then just ask for a merge. Jorn has been baby sitting it, whilst the work on cute progresses.
[19:24] <phillw> wxl: I can confirm that Jorn's workaround for LSC works... just need to tell people to ignore all the bitching the error reports throw up, but it does not report an error on completion and the full suite is available to LSC
[19:24] <wxl> phillw: make that clear in the bug and we'll be good
[19:25] <phillw> wilco
[19:25] <phillw> it's not going to get a fix, but is it okay to mark as triaged?
[19:26] <wxl> phillw: naw, we should just call it won't fix. but change the title that there's a workaround.
[19:27] <phillw> okies... let go dig it up!
[19:27] <phillw> +me
[19:27] <wxl> phillw: if you need me to do anything, let me know
[19:27] <wxl> i'm upgrading bsd servers over here
[19:39] <phillw> wxl: you'll have to change bug status.. needs a bug person :) bug 1467517
[19:39] <wxl> phillw: on it
[19:41] <wxl> bug 1467517 is done, thanks
[19:41] <phillw> wxl: no longer critical... actually - it never wa
[19:41] <wxl> ianorlin: you might want to pop onto #lubuntu and help whouser with multimonitor
[19:43] <phillw> important, sure ... but critical.... nah
[19:43] <wxl> heh i made it low oops XD
[19:44] <phillw> for a n00b, it is important... I know we know how to get around it using apt / synaptic etc... but :)
[20:04] <phillw> wxl: appreciate your views on the applet email now that melodie has updated it.... We NEED a bug raising :)
[20:18] <phillw> bbs need to drop internet soon, else alternate ignores the ISO
[20:44] <wxl> phillw: so is there a bug report?
[20:46] <phillw> wxl: not to my knowledge,,, what would you like it reporting against... I can use the VM with the multiple a-applets if you want.
[20:47] <wxl> phillw: sheesh, i don't know. lxpanel?
[20:47] <wxl> we can always reassign it
[20:47] <phillw> i was thinking openbox, after what melodie said about us running an older version
[20:48] <wxl> just getting the report will be the essential factor
[20:48] <phillw> but, I'll do it for lxpanel
[20:51] <phillw> this bug is bloody crazy..... 32 bit alternate... no a-applet and only 1 nm applet (as i saw with 64 bit alternate)
[21:00] <phillw> wxl: can you give me the link for the email thread [Lubuntu-qa] Duplicate applet icons for online help etc 'â' and network-manager (nm-applet) Thanks
[21:01] <wxl> phillw: starts at https://lists.launchpad.net/lubuntu-qa/msg05277.html
[21:02] <phillw> wxl: does it make sense to you to tie the bug to the on going email, as it has far more detail?
[21:02] <wxl> phillw: sure, but summarize
[21:02] <phillw> I will :)
[21:11] <phillw> wxl: wait for it to process, then go and edit!!! bug 1488660
[22:41] <phillw> aaaaggggghhhhhhh.....
[22:42] <phillw> side by side 32 bit alternate issue had 2 x nm-applets, no 'a' applets and a reboot now shows just one nm-applet
[22:44] <phillw> aaarrrgggghhhhh... and after a 2nd reboot.. i have 2 x nm-applets....
[22:46] <phillw> then just one ....
[22:48] <phillw> and then one.... and then two....
[23:06] <phillw> wxl: hmm, it seems the boot is different as to if I get two nm-applets or just one
[23:15] <phillw> cancel that...


[01:25] <dbainbri> when MAAS is generating the dhcpd.conf, it doesn't seem to use the dns_servers specified against the subnet, instead it uses the server IP on which MAAS is installed.
[01:25] <dbainbri> are my observations accurate?
[01:25] <dbainbri> (of am i missing something)
[11:29] <imranh_> So I have a server with 3 NICs, the first 2 are to be binded together and the third will be used for management/netbooting. i want to bonded interface to be the one that gets a static IP and the third NIC should be left unconfigured by the OS. Can i expect any problems with this setup?
[11:39] <imranh_> answer: yes
[11:48] <imranh_> Can not apply stage config, no datasource found! Likely bad things to come!
[11:59] <imranh_> what i think is happening is that the bond isn't coming up properly
[11:59] <imranh_> i'm going to set it all off aagin
[12:00] <imranh_> but this time, when it's finished installing and reboots to boot from local disk
[12:00] <imranh_> i'm going to root it and log in and see what is going on
[14:18] <imranh_> ok
[14:18] <imranh_> so it may have been my fault that it doesn't work
[14:18] <imranh_> Warning: Unqualified SFP+ module detected
[15:22] <yuanliang> hello, guys!
[15:23] <yuanliang> 有人能说中文的吗
[15:23] <yuanliang> 我的英文只能看，不能说，呃
[15:29] <imranh_> ok fixed my problem, updated the fw on the nic
[15:41] <imranh_> where on earth do i put vlan info into maas...
[15:42] <imranh_> https://maas.ubuntu.com/docs/networks.html are out of date
[15:51] <imranh_> done it via cli now
[16:04] <imranh_> ok
[16:04] <imranh_> i like
[16:04] <imranh_> can't do it via cli
[16:04] <imranh_> untagging the ports on my switch instead...
[19:00] <marka13> I was able to get maas+autopilot working. Question, is it the intent to only manage 1 cloud in landscape?
[19:13] <mup> Bug #1552324 opened: Cruft in storage section in specific node view <sts> <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1552324>
[19:28] <mup> Bug #1552324 changed: Cruft in storage section in specific node view <sts> <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1552324>
[19:28] <mup> Bug #1552382 opened: 2.0 Errors for removing a subnet <design> <ui> <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1552382>
[19:34] <mup> Bug #1552382 changed: 2.0 Errors for removing a subnet <design> <ui> <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1552382>
[19:34] <mup> Bug #1552324 opened: Cruft in storage section in specific node view <sts> <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1552324>
[19:43] <mup> Bug #1552324 changed: Cruft in storage section in specific node view <sts> <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1552324>
[19:43] <mup> Bug #1552382 opened: 2.0 Errors for removing a subnet <design> <ui> <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1552382>
[23:22] <mup> Bug #1552442 opened: [2.0a1] After upgrade, the Static range shows as reserved range <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1552442>
[23:22] <mup> Bug #1552444 opened: [2.0a1] After upgrade from 1.10, DHCP is disabled <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1552444>
[23:22] <mup> Bug #1552448 opened: [2.0a1] After upgrade form 1.10, dhcpd is enabled on wrong interface <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1552448>
[23:35] <mup> Bug #1552454 opened: [2.0a1] Managing DHCP in two subnets on different fabrics results in second subnet obtaining gateway of first subnet <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1552454>
[23:35] <mup> Bug #1552456 opened: [2.0a] Enabling dhcpd in two vlans on different fabrics results on dhcpd being configured only for one <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1552456>
[23:35] <mup> Bug #1552460 opened: [1Provide DHCP needs to have the ability to specify a gateway if it is not being set already <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1552460>
[23:47] <mup> Bug #1552454 changed: [2.0a1] Managing DHCP in two subnets on different fabrics results in second subnet obtaining gateway of first subnet <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1552454>
[23:47] <mup> Bug #1552456 changed: [2.0a] Enabling dhcpd in two vlans on different fabrics results on dhcpd being configured only for one <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1552456>
[23:47] <mup> Bug #1552460 changed: [1Provide DHCP needs to have the ability to specify a gateway if it is not being set already <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1552460>
[23:53] <mup> Bug #1552456 opened: [2.0a] Enabling dhcpd in two vlans on different fabrics results on dhcpd being configured only for one <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1552456>
[23:53] <mup> Bug #1552460 opened: [1Provide DHCP needs to have the ability to specify a gateway if it is not being set already <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1552460>
[23:53] <mup> Bug #1552461 opened: Rack Controller interface parsing doesn't add the gateway even when the gateway is known <MAAS:New> <https://launchpad.net/bugs/1552461>