[00:03] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: slony1-2 [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed/universe) [2.2.10-2] (no packageset)
[00:07] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: tds-fdw [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed/universe) [2.0.2-3] (no packageset)
[00:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: toastinfo [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.4-2] (no packageset)
[00:08] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: wal2json [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed/universe) [2.4-2] (no packageset)
[00:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: slony1-2 [riscv64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [2.2.10-2] (no packageset)
[00:13] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: starpu [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.3.9+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[00:35] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: software-properties (focal-proposed/main) [<IP_ADDRESS> => <IP_ADDRESS>] (core)
[00:58] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: starpu [riscv64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.3.9+dfsg-1] (no packageset)
[05:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cmark [amd64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [0.30.2-3] (no packageset)
[05:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cmark [armhf] (jammy-proposed/universe) [0.30.2-3] (no packageset)
[05:21] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cmark [arm64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [0.30.2-3] (no packageset)
[05:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cmark [s390x] (jammy-proposed/universe) [0.30.2-3] (no packageset)
[05:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cmark [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed/universe) [0.30.2-3] (no packageset)
[05:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: cmark [riscv64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [0.30.2-3] (no packageset)
[08:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cmark [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [0.30.2-2]
[08:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cmark [armhf] (jammy-proposed) [0.30.2-2]
[08:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cmark [arm64] (jammy-proposed) [0.30.2-2]
[08:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cmark [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed) [0.30.2-2]
[08:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cmark [riscv64] (jammy-proposed) [0.30.2-2]
[08:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cmark [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [0.30.2-3]
[08:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cmark [armhf] (jammy-proposed) [0.30.2-3]
[08:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cmark [riscv64] (jammy-proposed) [0.30.2-3]
[08:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cmark [s390x] (jammy-proposed) [0.30.2-2]
[08:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cmark [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed) [0.30.2-3]
[08:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cmark [arm64] (jammy-proposed) [0.30.2-3]
[08:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted cmark [s390x] (jammy-proposed) [0.30.2-3]
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pglogical [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [2.4.0-1]
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pglogical [armhf] (jammy-proposed) [2.4.0-1]
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pglogical [riscv64] (jammy-proposed) [2.4.0-1]
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted plr [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [1:8.4.4-1]
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted plr [armhf] (jammy-proposed) [1:8.4.4-1]
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted plr [riscv64] (jammy-proposed) [1:8.4.4-1]
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted powa-archivist [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [4.1.2-2]
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted powa-archivist [armhf] (jammy-proposed) [4.1.2-2]
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted powa-archivist [riscv64] (jammy-proposed) [4.1.2-2]
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted prefix [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [1.2.9-4]
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pglogical [arm64] (jammy-proposed) [2.4.0-1]
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pglogical [s390x] (jammy-proposed) [2.4.0-1]
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted plr [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed) [1:8.4.4-1]
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted powa-archivist [arm64] (jammy-proposed) [4.1.2-2]
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted powa-archivist [s390x] (jammy-proposed) [4.1.2-2]
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted prefix [armhf] (jammy-proposed) [1.2.9-4]
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted prefix [riscv64] (jammy-proposed) [1.2.9-4]
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted preprepare [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [0.9-6]
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted preprepare [armhf] (jammy-proposed) [0.9-6]
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted preprepare [riscv64] (jammy-proposed) [0.9-6]
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pglogical [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed) [2.4.0-1]
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted plr [s390x] (jammy-proposed) [1:8.4.4-1]
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted prefix [arm64] (jammy-proposed) [1.2.9-4]
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted prefix [s390x] (jammy-proposed) [1.2.9-4]
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted preprepare [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed) [0.9-6]
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted pssh [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [2.3.4-1]
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted plr [arm64] (jammy-proposed) [1:8.4.4-1]
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted prefix [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed) [1.2.9-4]
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted preprepare [s390x] (jammy-proposed) [0.9-6]
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted powa-archivist [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed) [4.1.2-2]
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted preprepare [arm64] (jammy-proposed) [0.9-6]
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted repmgr [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [5.2.1-2]
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted repmgr [armhf] (jammy-proposed) [5.2.1-2]
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted repmgr [riscv64] (jammy-proposed) [5.2.1-2]
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted slony1-2 [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [2.2.10-2]
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted slony1-2 [armhf] (jammy-proposed) [2.2.10-2]
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted slony1-2 [riscv64] (jammy-proposed) [2.2.10-2]
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted starpu [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [1.3.9+dfsg-1]
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted starpu [armhf] (jammy-proposed) [1.3.9+dfsg-1]
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted starpu [riscv64] (jammy-proposed) [1.3.9+dfsg-1]
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tds-fdw [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [2.0.2-3]
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted repmgr [arm64] (jammy-proposed) [5.2.1-2]
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted repmgr [s390x] (jammy-proposed) [5.2.1-2]
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted slony1-2 [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed) [2.2.10-2]
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted starpu [arm64] (jammy-proposed) [1.3.9+dfsg-1]
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted starpu [s390x] (jammy-proposed) [1.3.9+dfsg-1]
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tds-fdw [armhf] (jammy-proposed) [2.0.2-3]
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tds-fdw [riscv64] (jammy-proposed) [2.0.2-3]
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted toastinfo [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [1.4-2]
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted toastinfo [armhf] (jammy-proposed) [1.4-2]
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted toastinfo [riscv64] (jammy-proposed) [1.4-2]
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted repmgr [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed) [5.2.1-2]
[08:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted slony1-2 [s390x] (jammy-proposed) [2.2.10-2]
[08:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tds-fdw [arm64] (jammy-proposed) [2.0.2-3]
[08:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tds-fdw [s390x] (jammy-proposed) [2.0.2-3]
[08:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted toastinfo [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed) [1.4-2]
[08:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wal2json [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [2.4-2]
[08:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wal2json [armhf] (jammy-proposed) [2.4-2]
[08:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wal2json [riscv64] (jammy-proposed) [2.4-2]
[08:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted slony1-2 [arm64] (jammy-proposed) [2.2.10-2]
[08:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted tds-fdw [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed) [2.0.2-3]
[08:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted toastinfo [s390x] (jammy-proposed) [1.4-2]
[08:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wal2json [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed) [2.4-2]
[08:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted starpu [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed) [1.3.9+dfsg-1]
[08:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wal2json [arm64] (jammy-proposed) [2.4-2]
[08:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted toastinfo [arm64] (jammy-proposed) [1.4-2]
[08:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted wal2json [s390x] (jammy-proposed) [2.4-2]
[09:26] <doko> no britney run for the last 30hours?
[09:26] <tsimonq2> Was just wondering myself.
[09:37] <RikMills> juliank: ^^^
[09:38] <juliank> sil2100: ^^^^
[09:38] <juliank> RikMills: sorry, I don't do britney
[09:38] <RikMills> ah, right. sorry
[09:39] <juliank> anyhow, this run seems stuck: Generated on: 2021.10.26 15:53:56 +0000
[09:39] <juliank> judging from https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/update_output.txt
[09:40] <ginggs> ben also seems to be on vac  https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/transitions/ generated on  Tue, 26 Oct 2021 17:08:14 +0000
[09:40] <RikMills> https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/log/jammy/2021-10-26/
[09:40] <RikMills> there the last run crashed and died, then no more
[09:42] <RikMills> possibly coincidence, but that went foobar just after you did https://irclogs.ubuntu.com/2021/10/26/%23ubuntu-release.html#t12:13
[09:50] <RikMills> which I misread :/
[10:09] <laney> oooooooooh let me back on snakefruit
[10:09] <laney> :D
[10:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: glance (hirsute-proposed/main) [2:22.0.0-0ubuntu1 => 2:22.1.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack)
[10:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nova (hirsute-proposed/main) [3:23.0.2-0ubuntu1 => 3:23.1.0-0ubuntu1] (openstack)
[11:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [s390x] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.53.0+dfsg1+llvm-4ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[11:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [i386] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.53.0+dfsg1+llvm-4ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[12:00] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.53.0+dfsg1+llvm-4ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[12:45] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected squid-deb-proxy [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.8.14ubuntu1]
[12:54] <vorlon> juliank, ginggs, RikMills: hung python process talking to launchpad (the one that grabs excuses bugs); cleared now, next run will start shortly
[12:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: squid-deb-proxy (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.8.14 => 0.8.14ubuntu1] (no packageset)
[12:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: unity (impish-proposed/universe) [7.5.1+21.10.20210601.1-0ubuntu1 => 7.5.1+21.10.20211026-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) (sync)
[12:55] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: unity (focal-proposed/universe) [7.5.0+20.04.20200312-0ubuntu1 => 7.5.1+20.04.20211026.1-0ubuntu1] (no packageset) (sync)
[12:56] <RikMills> vorlon: ty :)
[12:57] <ginggs> thanks!
[13:17] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected clevis [source] (hirsute-proposed) [16-1ubuntu0.1]
[13:18] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected clevis [source] (focal-proposed) [12-1ubuntu2.3]
[14:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: clevis (focal-proposed/universe) [12-1ubuntu2.2 => 12-1ubuntu2.3] (no packageset)
[14:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: clevis (hirsute-proposed/universe) [16-1 => 16-1ubuntu0.1] (no packageset)
[14:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-470 (impish-proposed/restricted) [470.74-0ubuntu1 => 470.82.00-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>] (i386-whitelist)
[14:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-470 (bionic-proposed/restricted) [470.74-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS> => 470.82.00-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>] (no packageset)
[14:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-470 (hirsute-proposed/restricted) [470.74-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS> => 470.82.00-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>] (i386-whitelist)
[14:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-470 (focal-proposed/restricted) [470.74-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS> => 470.82.00-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>] (i386-whitelist)
[14:24] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rustc [amd64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.53.0+dfsg1+llvm-4ubuntu1] (i386-whitelist)
[14:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: nvidia-graphics-drivers-495 (impish-proposed/primary) [495.44-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>]
[14:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: nvidia-graphics-drivers-495 (jammy-proposed/primary) [495.44-0ubuntu1]
[14:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: nvidia-graphics-drivers-495 (focal-proposed/primary) [495.44-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>]
[14:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: nvidia-graphics-drivers-495 (hirsute-proposed/primary) [495.44-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>]
[14:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tzdata [source] (impish-proposed) [2021e-0ubuntu0.21.10]
[14:26] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New source: nvidia-graphics-drivers-495 (bionic-proposed/primary) [495.44-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>]
[14:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tzdata [source] (hirsute-proposed) [2021e-0ubuntu0.21.04]
[14:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tzdata [source] (focal-proposed) [2021e-0ubuntu0.20.04]
[14:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted tzdata [source] (bionic-proposed) [2021e-0ubuntu0.18.04]
[15:05] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: sight [amd64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [21.0.0-1] (no packageset)
[15:09] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: xf86-video-armsoc-endlessm (focal-proposed/universe) [1.4.1-0ubuntu6~20.04 => 1.4.1-0ubuntu7~20.04] (no packageset)
[15:30] <bdmurray> Could an archive admin fully phase apache2 for focal? It fixes an SRU regression and should go straight to 100.
[15:34] <sil2100_> bdmurray: I can do that o/
[15:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-460-server (impish-proposed/restricted) [460.91.03-0ubuntu1 => 460.106.00-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>] (core, i386-whitelist)
[15:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-460-server (focal-proposed/restricted) [460.91.03-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS> => 460.106.00-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>] (i386-whitelist)
[15:37] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-460-server (hirsute-proposed/restricted) [460.91.03-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS> => 460.106.00-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>] (core, i386-whitelist)
[15:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-460-server (bionic-proposed/restricted) [460.91.03-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS> => 460.106.00-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>] (no packageset)
[15:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-450-server (hirsute-proposed/restricted) [450.142.00-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS> => 450.156.00-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>] (core, i386-whitelist)
[15:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-450-server (impish-proposed/restricted) [450.142.00-0ubuntu2 => 450.156.00-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>] (core, i386-whitelist)
[15:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-450-server (bionic-proposed/restricted) [450.142.00-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS> => 450.156.00-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>] (no packageset)
[15:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-450-server (focal-proposed/restricted) [450.142.00-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS> => 450.156.00-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>] (i386-whitelist)
[15:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-418-server (impish-proposed/restricted) [418.211.00-0ubuntu2 => 418.226.00-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>] (core, i386-whitelist, kernel-dkms)
[15:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-418-server (bionic-proposed/multiverse) [418.211.00-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS> => 418.226.00-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>] (kernel-dkms)
[15:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-418-server (hirsute-proposed/restricted) [418.211.00-0ubunt<IP_ADDRESS> => 418.226.00-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>] (core, i386-whitelist, kernel-dkms)
[15:40] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: nvidia-graphics-drivers-418-server (focal-proposed/multiverse) [418.211.00-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS> => 418.226.00-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>] (i386-whitelist, kernel-dkms)
[16:11] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libsignon-glib [source] (impish-proposed) [2.1-3ubuntu0.21.10]
[16:12] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted libsignon-glib [source] (hirsute-proposed) [2.1-3ubuntu0.21.04]
[16:25] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: squid-deb-proxy (bionic-proposed/universe) [0.8.14 => 0.8.14ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>] (no packageset)
[16:32] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected squid-deb-proxy [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.8.14ubuntu1]
[16:33] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted squid-deb-proxy [source] (hirsute-proposed) [0.8.15ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>]
[16:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted squid-deb-proxy [source] (bionic-proposed) [0.8.14ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>]
[16:34] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted squid-deb-proxy [source] (focal-proposed) [0.8.15ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>]
[16:46] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted unity [sync] (impish-proposed) [7.5.1+21.10.20211026-0ubuntu1]
[16:47] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted unity [sync] (focal-proposed) [7.5.1+20.04.20211026.1-0ubuntu1]
[17:02] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New: accepted sight [amd64] (jammy-proposed) [21.0.0-1]
[17:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted clevis [source] (focal-proposed) [12-1ubuntu2.3]
[17:23] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted clevis [source] (hirsute-proposed) [16-1ubuntu0.1]
[18:41] <bdmurray> vorlon, sil2100: Could one of you release tzdata and copy it to -security?
[19:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ufw (impish-proposed/main) [0.36.1-1 => 0.36.1-1ubuntu1] (core)
[19:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ufw (bionic-proposed/main) [0.36-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS> => 0.36-0ubuntu<IP_ADDRESS>] (core)
[19:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ufw (hirsute-proposed/main) [0.36-7.1 => 0.36-7.1ubuntu1] (core)
[19:20] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: ufw (focal-proposed/main) [0.36-6 => 0.36-6ubuntu1] (core)
[20:21] <coreycb> hello SRU team, we have a small software-properties update in the focal queue to enable the yoga cloud archive if someone has cycles to take a look.
[21:00] <bdmurray> coreycb: does it incorporate the failed to verify changes currently in -proposed?
[21:01] <coreycb> let me check, the diff hasn't published yet
[21:03] <coreycb> bdmurray: it looks like it includes this one https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/software-properties/+bug/1934439
[21:08] <coreycb> bdmurray: yes looks like it includes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1920836 as well. I think we'll need robert's input to unblock things.
[21:09] <bdmurray> coreycb: or blackboxsw as he's quite familiar with ESM
[21:11]  * blackboxsw reads backlog. So is the ask here for me to put up a packaging PR against  software-properties with a fix for this bug?
[21:11] <blackboxsw> from the looks of the last comment, that's a yes.
[21:13] <bdmurray> blackboxsw: more immediately with bug 1920836 should the existing changes be dropped so that other SRUs of software-properties can proceed?
[21:14] <blackboxsw> bdmurray: coreycb +1 that queued SRU should be blocked. Looks like robert and I will have to touch base on next steps ther .
[21:14] <blackboxsw> *there and get uploads in place. I don't think the existing upload will work well enough.
[21:17] <coreycb> blackboxsw: thanks for looking. should we remove it from the ubuntu/focal branch?
[21:19] <blackboxsw> coreycb: from the git-ubuntu clone pkg/ubuntu/focal-updates|proposed I don't see that the changeset officially released right?
[21:20] <blackboxsw> I'm trying to check upstream now for sofware-properties and not just the pkging branches
[21:21] <coreycb> blackboxsw: I'm looking at it here - https://git.launchpad.net/software-properties
[21:23] <coreycb> blackboxsw: it didn't officially release, so we can still revert it from the branch
[21:23] <coreycb> it was only in proposed
[21:23] <blackboxsw> coreycb: hrm. ok. yeah it's not an ideal solution, so it does lead to degredation in behavior
[21:24] <blackboxsw> this then puts me squarely in the way of your current upload though right?
[21:24] <blackboxsw> as in, your upload would be dependent on a patch from UA folks to get ua_status appropriately?
[21:25] <coreycb> blackboxsw: yes that's my only angle here, is I have an sru that is on top of the one that failed testing in proposed
[21:26] <coreycb> blackboxsw: anyway it doesn't need attention right at the moment if you want to sync with robert tomorrow or something
[21:26] <blackboxsw> ok coreycb how does a PR from me up tomorrow against the current upstream ubuntu/focal branches
[21:26] <coreycb> I do want to get mine in soonish though
[21:27] <coreycb> blackboxsw: sounds good, thanks!
[21:27] <bdmurray> blackboxsw: it would be nice to get this sorted soon as its been in -proposed for quite some time
[21:27] <blackboxsw> yeah this rejected SRU upload should probably be cleaned up sooner rather than later. Please feel free to ping me tomorrow if unresolved. I can glance at it today and put up a merge request tagging you and Robert
[21:27] <blackboxsw> bdmurray: yes it's way overdo
[21:28] <blackboxsw> overdue?
[22:14] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: accepted python-glance-store [source] (focal-proposed) [2.0.0-0ubuntu3]
[22:36] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- Unapproved: rejected xf86-video-armsoc-endlessm [source] (focal-proposed) [1.4.1-0ubuntu7~20.04]
[23:17] <vorlon> overdü
[23:22] <teward> bdmurray: i'm not SRU or Release Team, but it sounds like it'd be more prudent to switch to an upstream supported LibreOffice branch instead of a third party
[23:22] <teward> (switching to a 'third party' branch I don't think would qualify as Microrelease SRU since it's NOT from the original upstream provider
[23:22] <teward> might also introduce future merge chaos/difficulties even by switching providers.
[23:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-crossbeam-utils [amd64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [0.8.5-1] (no packageset)
[23:30] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-crossbeam-utils [armhf] (jammy-proposed/universe) [0.8.5-1] (no packageset)
[23:31] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-crossbeam-utils [arm64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [0.8.5-1] (no packageset)
[23:38] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-semver-0.9 [amd64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [0.9.0-2] (no packageset)
[23:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: exhale [amd64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [0.2.3-1] (no packageset)
[23:39] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-crossbeam-utils-0.7 [amd64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [0.7.2-3] (no packageset)
[23:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-crossbeam-utils-0.7 [arm64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [0.7.2-3] (no packageset)
[23:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: taskd [amd64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.1.0+dfsg-4] (no packageset)
[23:42] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-semver-0.9 [armhf] (jammy-proposed/universe) [0.9.0-2] (no packageset)
[23:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-crossbeam-utils-0.7 [armhf] (jammy-proposed/universe) [0.7.2-3] (no packageset)
[23:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-crossbeam-utils [s390x] (jammy-proposed/universe) [0.8.5-1] (no packageset)
[23:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-semver-0.9 [s390x] (jammy-proposed/universe) [0.9.0-2] (no packageset)
[23:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-crossbeam-utils-0.7 [s390x] (jammy-proposed/universe) [0.7.2-3] (no packageset)
[23:44] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-semver-0.9 [arm64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [0.9.0-2] (no packageset)
[23:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-crossbeam-utils-0.7 [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed/universe) [0.7.2-3] (no packageset)
[23:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-crossbeam-utils [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed/universe) [0.8.5-1] (no packageset)
[23:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-semver-0.9 [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed/universe) [0.9.0-2] (no packageset)
[23:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: taskd [arm64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.1.0+dfsg-4] (no packageset)
[23:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: taskd [riscv64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.1.0+dfsg-4] (no packageset)
[23:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-crossbeam-utils-0.7 [riscv64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [0.7.2-3] (no packageset)
[23:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-semver-0.9 [riscv64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [0.9.0-2] (no packageset)
[23:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: taskd [s390x] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.1.0+dfsg-4] (no packageset)
[23:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: rust-crossbeam-utils [riscv64] (jammy-proposed/universe) [0.8.5-1] (no packageset)
[23:52] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: taskd [armhf] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.1.0+dfsg-4] (no packageset)
[23:53] -queuebot:#ubuntu-release- New binary: taskd [ppc64el] (jammy-proposed/universe) [1.1.0+dfsg-4] (no packageset)


TIL trains in Switzerland cannot (by law) have 256 axles, as the hardware axle counters they use to detect train's length rollover at 256


[00:00] <luc4_mac> Or even pressing a button.
[00:00] <dileks> you tried a different mainline kernel from ppa?
[00:01] <luc4_mac> No, the one which came with 12.04.
[00:01] <dileks> http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v3.2.17-precise/
[00:01] <luc4_mac> 3.2.0-24-generic
[00:01] <dileks> http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/v3.3.5-precise/
[00:02] <luc4_mac> pae… I don't know why I have pae here...
[00:03] <luc4_mac> Do you want me to try those?
[00:03] <dileks> I hoped you want to...
[00:04] <luc4_mac> Yes, I just wanted to make sure I understood.
[00:04] <luc4_mac> This is a server, connection must stay up. I'll test those and the one from 11.10. Thanks.
[00:05] <luc4_mac> Also, this is severe bug. I would like this to be solved for anyone.
[00:05] <luc4_mac> In case it is a bug of course.
[00:07] <dileks> lets see if it is a bug
[00:08] <luc4_mac> Thank you for your time. I'll update the bugreport with the results. Thanks.
[00:08] <dileks> OK
[00:08] <luc4_mac> Do you think I should mark the related package to kernel? Or should I leave it blank?
[00:09] <dileks> do testing first?
[00:10] <luc4_mac> ok
[00:10] <dileks> hope this helped you
[00:10] <luc4_mac> sure, thanks!
[00:10] <dileks> I am afk, 02:10am here
[00:12] <luc4_mac> here as well, no problem. Bye!
[14:27] <adrian15> Hi. I'm trying to build an special kernel described at: https://github.com/ah-/gmux-scripts/blob/master/README (Compile and install the patched kernel) on my Debian Unstable although the original instructions were for Ubuntu. I am currently getting a: dpkg-shlibdeps: error: syntax error in debian/control at line 13: first block lacks a source field  when running:
[14:27] <adrian15> skipabi=true skipmodule=true fakeroot debian/rules binary-perarch . Is that linux-tools package actually needed when using the system? Is it the right channel for asking this question? Thank you.
[18:05] <bernie> hello. any chance to backport this bugfix to the stable kernels for oneiric and precise? https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48266
[18:05] <ubot2> Freedesktop bug 48266 in DRM/Intel "[GM45 regression] HDMI audio stopped working after 3.2.0" [Normal,Resolved: duplicate]
[18:07] <bernie> it's a 3.2 regression which breaks DisplayPort audio
[18:08] <bernie> on intel hardware, such as the thinkpad X201 and X220.
[18:29] <jwi> bernie: that's weird - a regression in 3.2 shouldn't affect oneiric, and the patch shouldn't make any difference on X220.
[18:30] <bernie> jwi: oh, i forgot i had upgraded my oneiric system to 3.2 long ago
[18:30] <bernie> jwi: then i guess this fix is only needed on precise
[18:33] <jwi> bernie: it's in the latest 3.2-stable kernel, so i guess precise-proposed will pick it up fairly soon


[04:57] <Mirv> morning
[09:32] <didrocks> sil2100: hey!
[09:32] <didrocks> sil2100: there is a new failure, but just one and on the 3 architectures!
[09:33] <didrocks> unity.tests.test_hud.HudBehaviorTests.test_alt_arrow_keys_not_eaten
[09:33] <didrocks> jibel: FYI ^
[09:33] <didrocks> we were almost there, snif!
[09:34] <sil2100> \o/
[09:34] <didrocks> sil2100: I was really believing we would release now :p
[09:34] <sil2100> didrocks: ok, let me see that then, looks like a more random failure, but maybe we can make it better not to fail
[09:34] <didrocks> at least the next/prev are fixed!
[09:34] <didrocks> sil2100: the weird thing is that it's failing on the 3 config
[09:34] <didrocks> let's hope it's reproduceable
[09:34] <didrocks> sil2100: ps-indicators-autopilot-release-testing
[09:34] <didrocks> rev 63
[09:35] <sil2100> Ah, ok, sorry, I misunderstood you
[09:35] <didrocks> seb128: popey: btw, do not hesitate to upgrade to the daily-build ppa
[09:35] <sil2100> So it's failing on all, hm hm
[09:35] <didrocks> sil2100: yep
[09:35] <didrocks> seb128: popey: I did it, and it looks good, just have this indicator failure ^
[09:36]  * sil2100 pulls latest unity
[09:36] <seb128> didrocks, you rebuilt unity with the compiz opengl abi downgraded?
[09:36] <didrocks> sil2100: daily-build ppa
[09:36] <didrocks> yep
[09:36] <popey> didrocks: i do every morning
[09:36] <didrocks> sweet ;)
[09:36] <seb128> didrocks, k, upgrading
[09:39] <sil2100> Ok, so, a check for is_focused is not enough, *sighs*
[09:40] <didrocks> sil2100: so, the test is giving a false positive?
[09:40] <didrocks> sil2100: do you know what changed from yesterday?
[09:41] <sil2100> didrocks: I have no idea, I mean, this failure seems to happen when the Terminal takes a bit longer to start - i.e. the shell on it
[09:42] <sil2100> I added a wait for the Terminal window to have focus, but as I can see it doesn't help always, since the window can be focused but not yet ready to fetch input
[09:42] <sil2100> I'll try to think of a quick clean solution
[09:44] <seb128> mhr3, hey
[09:45] <seb128> mhr3, with the current daily build my dash has a sort of weird blue "," between the expendable categories and their ">"
[09:45] <seb128> e.g "installed" in the app lens
[09:45] <didrocks> sil2100: thanks, counting on you to be able to release unity :)
[09:45] <seb128> is that normal/wanted?
[09:45] <didrocks> mhr3: confirmed here
[09:45] <mhr3> seb128, yea, i saw that with trunk some time ago
[09:45] <mhr3> not sure who did that :)
[09:46] <didrocks> you didn't ask? :/
[09:46] <mhr3> iirc the number of results wasn't displayed either in that case
[09:46] <seb128> no
[09:46] <seb128> there is only a ","
[09:46] <seb128> or "."
[09:46] <mhr3> thought it's an upcoming design change
[09:47] <seb128> well, it could be to drop the label, the weird char seems wrong and misaligned though, I somewhat doubt it's a design change
[09:47] <mhr3> andyrock, would you know something about that ^?
[09:47] <popey> it's a ':' here seb128
[09:48] <popey> you have good eyes! I never noticed that! ☺
[09:48] <didrocks> I just have a . here
[09:48] <seb128> popey, could be, I've an hard time to see exactly what char it is with my background color
[09:48] <didrocks> popey: he's good, isn't it? :)
[09:49] <andyrock> mhr3, no ask nick :)
[09:51] <andyrock> mhr3, btw if Nick is not online (or busy) i can try to fix it in the afternoon
[09:51] <didrocks> we will never be able to release unity :(
[09:52] <sil2100> huh? Something besides the AP test is broken? :(
[09:53] <didrocks> sil2100: yeah, but not linked
[09:53] <didrocks> sil2100: you can continue on the test :)
[09:53] <sil2100> Oh...
[09:53] <sil2100> ;)
[09:54] <didrocks> hey dednick :)
[09:54] <dednick> howdy
[09:54] <didrocks> seb128 | mhr3, with the current daily build my dash has a sort of weird blue "," between the expendable categories and
[09:54] <didrocks>        | their ">"
[09:54] <didrocks> seb128 | e.g "installed" in the app lens
[09:54] <didrocks> dednick: good, this and one test failing that sil2100 is working on are the last step before enabling daily release of unity :-)
[09:55] <didrocks> dednick: do you know about it? or maybe have a look at it?
[09:55] <dednick> seb128: Do you have the "See X more results" showing next to the > ?
[09:55] <seb128> no
[09:55] <seb128> that replace those labels
[09:55] <seb128> replaces
[09:56] <seb128> I've like "Installed "," >"
[09:56] <seb128> without the ""
[09:56] <seb128> didrocks and mhr3 and popey confirmed
[09:56] <dednick> ok. i think i know what this is. mandel was doing something with StaticCairoText width calculations that might have caused a regression.
[09:56] <didrocks> dednick: I just have one one the file category working, all the others are like seb128 told
[09:56] <dednick> i know it has caused some problems before
[09:56] <didrocks> interesting :)
[09:57] <dednick> didrocks: i'll check with mandel about the status of that quick.
[09:57] <didrocks> thanks :)
[09:58] <popey> didrocks: what do we need to do to allow users to file bugs against the compiz package in the daily ppa with "ubuntu-bug compiz"? I am getting the usual "This is not an official Ubuntu package" popup from apport
[09:59] <didrocks> popey: let's see if we need to do that, as the daily-build is just a 4 hours step between build and distro normally
[09:59] <didrocks> popey: if we have some stack stalled for more days, maybe it will be useful, I'm just unsure for now
[10:01] <popey> ok
[10:18] <jibel> didrocks, with unity ppa, dash blinks when I type something in the search bar, I'll try to make a video
[10:18] <didrocks> thanks jibel, duflu will maybe have some hint about it
[10:23] <sil2100> hm, there doesn't seem any 100% safe way, so I'll do it a bit hackish
[10:24] <didrocks> sil2100: so adding more timing?
[10:26] <sil2100> Or maybe, let me check something on my guest session ;p
[10:27] <jibel> popey, hey, which tool do you use to record a video of a desktop session with the dash? I tried recordmydesktop, but it's all dark and only captures the background
[10:29] <popey> jibel: kazam
[10:30] <seb128> jibel, gtk-recordmydesktop works for recording the dash, etc on my raring
[10:30] <seb128> jibel, you can always use your phone or camera or something otherwise ;-)
[10:32] <jibel> seb128, it doesn't here with raring, all updates, etc on an intel atom IGC
[10:32] <jibel> i'll try kazam
[10:35] <didrocks> dednick: did you find anything relevant?
[10:39] <jibel> seb128, finally recordmydesktop works fine, the problem comes from totem for the playback
[10:42] <seb128> ahah
[10:47] <jibel> bug 1098502
[10:50] <sil2100> Ok, tested all nice solutions, none were giving me complete guarantee, so I'm using the simplest one
[10:50] <sil2100> A sleep call, yea, we like those
[10:52] <didrocks> sil2100: well, let's do that I guess…
[10:52]  * sil2100 sighs
[10:53] <sil2100> Preparing a merge
[10:53] <sil2100> I'll have a talk with thomi next week about doing it nicer, for now let's hope this will solve the issue for releasing unity
[10:54] <didrocks> sil2100: sounds good, yeah, let's do what we can for now :)
[10:54] <didrocks> but I need to know where dednick is as well, not sure if we should block the release on that issue, specifically if the fix is trivial…
[10:55] <dednick> didrocks: mandel is looking at the issue now.
[10:56] <didrocks> dednick: ah sweet, what is his IRC nickname? can he come into that chan? :)
[10:56] <dednick> didrocks: mandel
[10:56] <dednick> didrocks: i've just asked him to join
[10:57] <didrocks> thanks dednick :)
[10:57] <mandel> dednick, hello
[10:57] <didrocks> hey mandel ;)
[10:57] <didrocks> mandel: so, I guess all eyes are on you to release unity now, but no pressure :-)
[10:58] <didrocks> mandel: more seriously, do you think the fix will be trivial?
[10:58] <mandel> didrocks, hello, so I'm looking at the StaticCairotText rendering, it seems that the PrelayoutManagement does have the correct size, witch is interesting
[10:58] <mandel> didrocks,he, no pressure :)
[10:59] <didrocks> mandel: oh, "funny" did you notice it's a blue dot as well?
[10:59] <mandel> didrocks, that I did not see, let me check
[11:00] <didrocks> mandel: it's barely noticeable, but we are more than one having <category> . >
[11:00] <didrocks> with . being : for popey
[11:00] <mandel> didrocks, is more like two blue dots,  but is probably it trying to render the font and doing something wrong
[11:00] <didrocks> (and blue)
[11:00] <didrocks> ok :)
[11:00] <popey> yeah, could be squished text
[11:00] <popey> and not actually a :
[11:00] <didrocks> but why blue? :p
[11:01] <popey> well that too
[11:02] <mandel> didrocks, popey no to worry, I already have a fix, I need to clean the code a little and make sure it does not break in other cases
[11:02] <mandel> give me 15/30 mins or so to make sure
[11:02] <didrocks> mandel: you rock! :-)
[11:02] <dednick> mandel: remember to check the tooltip as well ;)
[11:03] <mandel> dednick, hehe, yes, I remember that ;)
[11:04] <sil2100> \o/
[11:04] <didrocks> sil2100: btw, if you need some approval on your branch
[11:04] <sil2100> https://code.launchpad.net/~sil2100/unity/autopilot_add_ugly_sleep/+merge/142869
[11:04] <didrocks> mandel: just to know, the fix will be in nux or unity?
[11:04] <sil2100> Please, free karma ;)
[11:04] <mandel> didrocks, unity
[11:04] <didrocks> mandel: ok, great, thanks ;)
[11:05] <didrocks> not respawing a rebuild immediately then
[11:05]  * sil2100 always wonders why he spends so much time writing all this rationale in the merge requests
[11:05] <didrocks> sil2100: I read them, worth it!
[11:05] <didrocks> :)
[11:06] <didrocks> sil2100: thanks! approved :)
[11:06] <sil2100> Thanks :)
[11:07] <sil2100> andyrock: soo, a Qt application for testing bug #1087422 is fine as well? ;)
[11:08] <sil2100> andyrock: I'll add the feature you're requesting in a moment then!
[11:09] <andyrock> sil2100, yeah it's fine I've already tested :)
[11:09] <andyrock> thank you btw :)
[11:18] <sil2100> andyrock: updated - the name is fine btw. ;p
[11:18] <sil2100> andyrock: test it once again and if it works as it did before, approve and let's get it merged!
[11:19] <didrocks> andyrock: sil2100: can you just wait that we do this release before getting it merged?
[11:19] <didrocks> andyrock: sil2100: I don't want we add one another variable parameter before this release :)
[11:19] <sil2100> andyrock: ^ ;)
[11:20] <andyrock> didrocks, sil2100 yeah no problem :)
[11:20] <didrocks> thanks :)
[11:21] <sil2100> andyrock: let's get the testapp thing merged in the meantime
[11:25] <mandel> didrocks, so nux revno 742 fixed a logical error in the layouts (no bug number, doh!) and before that was fixed I added a workaound for statica cairo text, with the new code in nux that is not longer needed and goes wrong in a diff way, I have fixed it and changed the test to ensure everything works correctly
[11:26] <didrocks> mandel: oh interesting side effect of a workaround then :-) do you have a branch handy?
[11:26] <mandel> didrocks, please take a look at https://code.launchpad.net/~mandel/unity/static-cairo-text/+merge/142873
[11:26] <andyrock> sil2100, ok let me wrote the AP test for unity (without merging it for the moment)
[11:26]  * didrocks opens and builds while reviewing
[11:26] <sil2100> \o/
[11:26] <mandel> didrocks, I will add no comments about nux && layouts ;-)
[11:27] <didrocks> heh :)
[11:27] <didrocks> mandel: well, I know what you mean, I felt the pain in the past :)
[11:28] <mandel> didrocks, I don't know if I should feel happy because I knew where to find the problem or otherwise
[11:29] <didrocks> mandel: ahah, well, you can call that "expertise on the subject" :)
[11:29] <didrocks> some kind of niche knowledge ;)
[11:32] <Mirv> can you reproduce that nautilus again starts behind other windows in raring+daily?
[11:34] <didrocks> mandel: confirming the fix is working! :)
[11:34] <didrocks> Mirv: hum, I don't see that
[11:34] <didrocks> mandel: nice work, thanks! ;)
[11:34] <didrocks> and still having tooltips :p
[11:34] <mandel> didrocks, take a look at the launcher, but works too, just in case :)
[11:34] <mandel> didrocks, you are faster than me ;)
[11:34] <Mirv> eg. maximized firefox, super + 1, nautilus starts to the background not front
[11:35] <Mirv> didrocks: ok, interesting, seems to me similar to what quantal had before nautilus was patched
[11:35] <didrocks> mandel: heh :)
[11:35] <didrocks> Mirv: ah indeed, if started with super + something
[11:36] <didrocks> I was cliking on the launcher
[11:36] <seb128> even clicking on the launcher it goes unfocussed for me
[11:37] <didrocks> hum, not here, maybe something with the state
[11:37] <seb128> we had to drop the nautilus patch, upstream fixed it in a different way for 3.6 which works for gnome-shell but not us
[11:37] <Mirv> same as seb128, although I noticed it requires the maximized window
[11:39] <seb128> andyrock was working on that
[11:39] <seb128> he had a patch for gtk, not sure how that is going
[11:40] <andyrock> seb128, what?
[11:40] <seb128> andyrock, nautilus not getting focus in raring
[11:40] <andyrock> again?
[11:40] <seb128> andyrock, well, "in raring", in 3.6 since we dropped your patch, since cosimoc did a different version which works for gnome-shell but not unity
[11:41] <seb128> andyrock, well, didn't you say it's a gtk bug in the timestamp handling?
[11:41] <andyrock> seb128, yeah i'm sure that gtk/gdk had that bug but startup notifications maybe can workaround it :)
[11:42] <andyrock> and unity does not support them
[11:42] <seb128> right
[11:42] <seb128> so it's not "again", it's "still" ;-)
[11:42] <seb128> andyrock, did you ever get any feedback on your gtk patch?
[11:42] <seb128> I wonder if we should just distro patch it
[11:43] <andyrock> seb128, no Trevinho and me opened a gdk bug with a very simple test program showing the issue
[11:43] <andyrock> btw we really need to support startup notification in unity
[11:44] <andyrock> Trevinho wants to do it directly in bamf
[11:44] <andyrock> but he is too busy
[11:44] <andyrock> we need to put that bug in the "polish blueprint"
[11:46] <seb128> right
[11:48] <Mirv> filed bug #1098533
[11:49] <didrocks> s/fullscreen/maximized/ isn't it?
[11:49] <Mirv> didrocks: thanks, yes, title is wrong
[11:49] <didrocks> yw ;)
[11:50] <Mirv> test case was correct. fixed title.
[13:06] <Trevinho> seb128: I have a workaround that I'll try to land upstream too...
[13:07] <Trevinho> seb128: this is the issue (and workaround) https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=688830
[13:19] <seb128> Trevinho, hey, thanks, I was looking for the bug earlier but I didn't remember enough about it to find it back
[13:19] <seb128> Trevinho, we should maybe distro patch it
[13:20] <seb128> Trevinho, not sure upstream is going to go anywhere on that anytime soon
[13:20] <Trevinho> seb128: I was talking of nautilus only.... Even if that change could maybe done at gdk level...
[13:21] <seb128> oh, ok
[13:27] <didrocks> Trevinho: another subject: on the one ws by default, do you still have something to do on the unity side?
[13:27] <didrocks> Trevinho: on the g-c-c side, I'll just set the hsize and hsize to 1x1 or 2x2 if disabled/enabled
[13:33] <Trevinho> didrocks: yes, I'm in the process of updating the shortcut-hints now... That's the final step..
[13:33] <Trevinho> didrocks: ah, and probably a few lines to remove in launcher controller (to avoid removal), but on launcher side everything is done
[13:33] <didrocks> Trevinho: ok, but agreed that on my side, I just have to do that, change hsize/vsize?
[13:33] <Trevinho> didrocks: yes, we listen to that value
[13:33] <didrocks> if one of them is > 1, you enable the "ws mode"
[13:34] <didrocks> Trevinho: excellent, thanks :)
[13:34] <didrocks> would be a nice hacking during my first flight on sunday
[13:34] <didrocks> too early on Sunday, so need something easy :)
[14:01] <mterry> cyphermox, more yellow paint.  While my branch built fine for i386 in a PPA, amd64 apparently died overnight
[14:21] <Trevinho> didrocks: will you also include an option to show/hide the desktop icon?
[14:21] <Trevinho> didrocks: it should be explained here btw https://docs.google.com/a/canonical.com/document/d/1cbPd9WSSbFHg4Z7BSOQxDKusMe2aJjj0FEF2AMxNOZM/edit
[14:23] <didrocks> Trevinho: yep, I'll do it at the same time
[14:23] <Trevinho> didrocks: fine, the notes at the bottom should explain everything
[14:27] <didrocks> yep ;)
[14:31] <mterry> didrocks, so how can we match a given daily build to a bzr commit number?
[14:33] <didrocks> mterry: quick easily, look at debian/changelog
[14:33] <didrocks> you have "automatic snapshot from rev <…>"
[14:33] <mterry> didrocks, ah yes!  ok
[14:34] <didrocks> mterry: btw, hopefully this build will be the first daily release! :)
[14:34] <didrocks> running all the tests
[14:34] <mterry> didrocks, yeah  :)
[14:34] <didrocks> then, running only the indicator tests on the indicator stack + whole ppa
[14:34] <didrocks> and if everything is fine, publishing!
[14:34]  * mterry crosses fingers
[14:37]  * didrocks too
[14:37] <didrocks> I think ~ 20 minutes for all the test running
[14:37] <didrocks> then, the indicators one will start (~55 minutes)
[14:37] <didrocks> tests*
[14:49] <mterry> didrocks, how can I see a list of packages uploaded for SRU but not yet accepted into -proposed?
[14:50] <didrocks> mterry: check the unapproved queue
[14:50] <didrocks> like for quantal:
[14:50] <didrocks> https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/quantal/+queue?queue_state=1&queue_text=
[14:50] <mterry> didrocks, there's a page on LP, right?
[14:50] <didrocks> yep :)
[14:50] <mterry> didrocks, nice, thanks
[14:50] <didrocks> yw
[14:50] <mterry> that's what I couldn't remember
[15:07] <mterry> cyphermox, despite the amd64 build failing for libappindicator in my PPA, I have to work on some other stuff today.  But I do think my branch makes things better anyway (i386 worked)
[15:34] <didrocks> mterry: cyphermox: FYI, I remove dbusmenu from the list of daily release, it's failing on every arch due (weirdly) to a missing file (see ppa failure)
[15:34] <didrocks> mterry: sil2100: on another note, all indicator tests passed \o/
[15:34] <didrocks> nice work sil2100 ;)
[15:34] <mterry> yay
[15:35] <sil2100> Yaaay! \o/
[15:35] <didrocks> as soon as unity is published on armhf, it will be time for the first daily release :)
[15:35] <sil2100> https://launchpadlibrarian.net/128198353/buildlog_ubuntu-raring-armhf.unity_6.12.0daily12.12.05bzr3034pkg0raring0_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz <- but it looks like a random failure
[15:36] <sil2100> didrocks: I guess in daily all is OK?
[15:36] <didrocks> sil2100: yeah, waiting for publishing
[15:41] <mterry> sil2100, ld crashed!?  ick
[15:46] <didrocks> ok, done
[15:46] <didrocks> time to force publication \o/
[15:47] <sil2100> Excellent!
[15:53] <didrocks> ok, readyyyyyyy
[15:54] <didrocks> and copy request to distro done \o/
[15:54] <didrocks> sil2100: mterry: first real daily release of unity done to the distro \o/
[15:54] <didrocks> enabling the cronjob now!
[15:55] <didrocks> nice work everyone :)
[15:55] <mterry> w00t!
[15:55]  * mterry opens champagne
[15:55]  * sil2100 claps his hands
[15:56]  * mterry uncomfortably watches the Jenkins bot proposing and approving its own branches
[15:57] <didrocks> mterry: heh, you know that even that was broken?
[15:57] <didrocks> I had to patch bzr lp-propose to have the option working
[15:58] <mterry> :)
[16:46] <didrocks> fginther: hey, I thought that merging for the latestsnapshot was skipping the build? https://code.launchpad.net/~ps-jenkins/bamf/latestsnapshot/+merge/142925
[16:49] <fginther> didrocks, no sorry, there has been no progress on that
[16:49] <didrocks> fginther: ok, you follow them and reapprove? :)
[16:50] <cyphermox> didrocks: indicator-session buils fine now (but with start-service disabled), and I got a autopkgtest test almost working; wanna do a first review before I propose a merge to actually merge this?
[16:50] <fginther> didrocks, I thought the approved rev_id issue was fixed. This is the first one of seen w/o an approved revid for many weeks
[16:50] <cyphermox> https://code.launchpad.net/~mathieu-tl/indicator-session/fix-tests/+merge/142951
[16:51] <didrocks> cyphermox: I would love to! looking :)
[16:52] <fginther> didrocks, looking into what happened here
[16:52] <didrocks> fginther: thanks :)
[16:54] <didrocks> cyphermox: it sounds good to me, did you run it with some autopkg infra?
[16:55] <cyphermox> yeah that's what I'm doing
[16:55] <didrocks> cyphermox: maybe localcheck should be integrationcheck ?
[16:55] <cyphermox> for now it's still failing but I was able to manually run it
[16:55] <cyphermox> could be
[16:55] <didrocks> ok :)
[16:55] <didrocks> cyphermox: as you wish for the naming, but this makes more sense to me than "local"
[16:55] <cyphermox> so it's just a matter of getting the autopkgtest script right
[16:55] <cyphermox> yeah
[16:55] <didrocks> sweet!
[16:55] <didrocks> :)
[16:55] <didrocks> nice work cyphermox, can't wait to see that one down! :)
[16:56] <cyphermox> yeah me too
[16:56] <cyphermox> the heavy drinking is starting to take a toll ;D
[16:56] <didrocks> cyphermox: ahah, you needed an excuse for that! :-)
[16:56] <cyphermox> didrocks: always do :P
[16:56] <didrocks> heh
[17:27] <didrocks> fginther: bamf and dee are the only 2 remaining ones not merged yet, isn't it?
[17:30] <fginther> didrocks, compiz is still building
[17:31] <didrocks> right :)
[17:32] <fginther> didrocks, yes, just those 3
[17:32] <didrocks> fginther: ok, thanks!
[17:32] <didrocks> fginther: yeah, maybe in the future, having those bypassing the build will gain a lot of CPU cycle
[17:32] <didrocks> fginther: especially as we are doing that everyday now (for all projects having new code)
[17:36] <fginther> didrocks, I'll make some time to work on this today and next week, will keep you posted
[17:36] <didrocks> fginther: excellent, thanks!
[17:36] <didrocks> fginther: if you need some special tag to recognize those kinds of merge or have any question, do not hesitate to ask!
[17:37] <fginther> didrocks, thanks!


[12:12] <sveinse> Yes! Finally it seems I've found a way to cross compile ARM applications (outside of xdeb) for Ubuntu ARM target!
[20:59] <gcl> apw: ping?  You wrote conmux, right?


[02:42]  * nigelb hugs persia
[02:42] <nigelb> Finally, the script worked!
[03:14] <nigelb> persia: I have some good news :)
[03:14] <nigelb> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bugs?field.subscriber=ubuntu-reviewers&field.tag=-patch-needswork+-patch-forwarded-upstream+-patch-forwarded-debian+-patch-accepted-upstream+-patch-accepted-debian+-patch-rejected-upstream+-patch-rejected-debian+-patch-rejected&field.tags_combinator=ALL&start=0
[03:14] <nigelb> only 1433 bugs with patches :)
[03:14] <nigelb> well, counting only those that fall in our subset :)
[03:26] <nigelb> I'll get to work on things when I get back from work :)
[03:26] <nigelb> So, I need to document workflow, add graphics, and re-write the docs :)
[03:39] <nigelb> hyperair: I got the sid pbuilder failure again
[03:39] <nigelb> can take a look at the logs and point out whats wrong?
[03:40] <nigelb> I: Configuring e2fsprogs...
[03:40] <nigelb> W: Failure while configuring required packages.
[03:40] <nigelb> hyperair: ^
[03:40] <hyperair> O_o
[03:40] <hyperair> that's all there is to it?
[03:41] <nigelb> yep
[03:41] <nigelb> no i mean thats the last 2 lines
[03:41] <nigelb> you want the whole thing?
[03:41] <hyperair> =\ weird thing
[03:41] <nigelb> that is the error about apt, but I have the fix for that in .pbuilderrc
[03:42] <nigelb> so, Im not sure whta I'm doing wrong
[03:43] <hyperair> O_o the fix for that in .pbuilderrc?
[03:43] <hyperair> what fix is this?
[03:43] <nigelb> um, apt isn't a required package, so generally DEBOOTSTRAPOPTS=("--include=apt" "${DEBOOTSTRAPOPTS[@]}") works
[03:44] <nigelb> thats the usual error I used to see in karmic when making sid pbuilder
[04:13] <hyperair> nigelb: that's just the apt issue. i thought you had an issue with e2fsprogs
[04:13] <nigelb> hyperair: oh, grr.
[04:13] <nigelb> how do I fix it?
[04:14] <nigelb> hyperair: my pbuilderrc file http://paste.ubuntu.com/440668/
[04:15] <hyperair> nigelb: i dunno.
[04:15] <hyperair> nigelb: can i see the full log?
[04:15] <nigelb> hyperair: sure, one moment
[04:16] <nigelb> http://paste.ubuntu.com/440670/
[04:16] <hyperair> weird. i've never seen that before
[04:17] <nigelb> hmmm
[04:17] <nigelb> later, work. I'm late.
[07:38] <dholbach> good morning
[15:07] <seb128> nigelb, dholbach: hey
[15:07] <seb128> could we get patch-needsdesign as an option?
[15:08] <seb128> seems to be required for some changes blocked on a design decision
[15:09] <dholbach> I'll let bdmurray and nigelb handle that :)
[15:09] <seb128> also would be nice to have a tools or an easy description about how to open a bug in debian
[15:09] <seb128> like give it a bug number in launchpad and get it to open an email with tags etc
[15:09] <seb128> similar to submittodebian
[15:10] <seb128> to forward changes to the bts
[15:10]  * vish thinks it is a nice addition , there are some bugs patches which are requests to change design
[16:16] <nigelb> seb128: no problem. Can you give me the exact situation when it has to be used? I'll update documentation and poke brian about the change
[16:18] <seb128> bug #562729
[16:18] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 562729 in gdebi (Ubuntu) (and 1 other project) "gdebi: could not show link: operation not supported (affects: 2) (heat: 14)" [Undecided,Confirmed] https://launchpad.net/bugs/562729
[16:18] <seb128> nigelb, ^
[16:18] <seb128> ups
[16:19] <seb128> #433838
[16:19] <nigelb> seb128: no no, I mean what should I change in the doc :)
[16:19] <seb128> rather
[16:19] <seb128> nigelb, well those have been reviewed from a packager perspective now
[16:19] <seb128> so they should not be in the review list
[16:20] <seb128> but they are blocked on design input
[16:20] <seb128> so they are neither needswork
[16:20] <seb128> not reviewed
[16:20] <seb128> nor
[16:20] <nigelb> hm, I agree, but in that case we can add all the things blocked by something else into a new category
[16:21] <seb128> ok, patch-needsreview
[16:21] <seb128> or needs<something>
[16:22] <seb128> I'm not sure what would be best wording
[16:22] <nigelb> patch-blocked?
[16:22] <nigelb> that sounds improper
[16:22] <seb128> we just need a way to opt things out of the queue
[16:22] <seb128> needsdecision
[16:22] <nigelb> yep, I hear you, I just want to think of something that could do that proprly
[16:22] <nigelb>  \o/
[16:22] <seb128> or input
[16:22] <nigelb> patch-needsdecision it is :)
[16:22] <seb128> or whatever
[16:23] <seb128> you should maybe check with a native speaker ;-)
[16:23] <seb128> I like needsinput as well I think
[16:23] <seb128> but I'm not english speaker ;-)
[16:23] <nigelb> needsinput or needsdecision - whatever is fine.
[16:23] <nigelb> I'll talk to brian and get the script updated along with the documentation
[16:24] <nigelb> seb128: Also, thanks for the suggesion :)
[16:24] <seb128> np
[16:24] <seb128> thank you for working on this
[16:24] <nigelb> happy to be :)
[16:24] <seb128> what about the "make easier to open a debian bug"?
[16:24] <seb128> do you think we could have a script
[16:24] <seb128> or email template?
[16:24] <nigelb> my coding skills are very poor, I know the right person to ping - bryce :D
[16:25] <nigelb> he probably already has a working beta of something similar ;)
[16:36] <nigelb> seb128: things seem to go faster than I thought.  I may have something for the debian bug in a few hours.  turns out its very easy :)
[16:38] <seb128> nice
[16:49] <vish> nigelb: needsinput or needsdecision , miss the "design" mention there , which is the actual blocker
[16:51] <nigelb> vish: I want a catch-all-tag for all issues blocked by something else
[16:51] <nigelb> We really don't wanna have 25 tags do we? ;)
[16:52] <vish> nigelb: the problem there would be getting back to such design bugs , how does a UX advocate get to the bugs?
[16:52] <vish> nigelb: the design bugs are a category of its own
[16:52] <nigelb> vish: you can have an ayatana tag saying design and then check for design+needsinput
[16:54] <vish> nigelb: you are then having an extra tag there too ;)
[16:54] <nigelb> vish: that isn't a reviewers tag
[16:54] <nigelb> I wanted to keep the review tags down
[16:54] <nigelb> because other stuff is also going to block
[16:55] <vish> nigelb: nah , i meant the reviewer has to add them anyway , and it needs to be mentioned in the wiki
[16:55] <vish> reviewers wiki
[16:55] <nigelb> vish: um why?
[16:56] <vish> nigelb: ex: bug #433838 , where the design input is waiting for the patch
[16:56] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 433838 in software-center (Ubuntu) "Use an icon in the location bar (affects: 1) (heat: 10)" [Low,New] https://launchpad.net/bugs/433838
[16:56] <nigelb> vish: its an ubuntu-specific application, which is a very speical case.
[16:56] <nigelb> Most of the time, revieweres is about pushing back upstream
[16:57]  * nigelb afk for some time.
[16:57] <nigelb> keep talking I'll reply when back
[16:57] <vish> nigelb: but we *are* having ubuntu specific  apps too and the team is being subscribed to those bugs
[16:57] <vish> nigelb: patch is there , but the reviewer needs to know the right tags to add
[17:57]  * vish *shrugs*
[18:05]  * nigelb coding
[18:05] <nigelb> Needs another few more minutes to fix this thing and push it
[18:37] <bencrisford> nigelb: so if the patch doesn't work properly I just click "Add Tag" and add patch-needswork ?
[18:43] <nigelb> bencrisford: add a comment telling what is not working.  Also tell that if the issue is fixed to change the tag back to patch tag
[18:49] <bencrisford> nigelb: Ok, I already told them what is not working, I will add the tag + second comment now
[18:49] <bencrisford> thanks :)
[18:50] <nigelb> bencrisford: awesome!! thanks :)
[18:51] <bencrisford> nigelb: hmm, it seems there wasnt even a "patch" tag in the first place
[18:51] <nigelb> how did you end up in the bug?
[18:51] <nigelb> that bug is part of clean sweep project, hence no patch tag
[18:54] <bencrisford> nigelb: Its assigned to me, bug 536975
[18:54] <ubot4> Launchpad bug 536975 in qcad (Ubuntu) "Qcad menu entry lacks a category in lucid 10.04 (affects: 8) (dups: 1) (heat: 52)" [Undecided,In progress] https://launchpad.net/bugs/536975
[18:54] <nigelb> bencrisford: ah, then its ok
[18:54] <bencrisford> the reviewers team is subscribed, but no patch tag
[18:56] <nigelb> hover over team name
[18:56] <nigelb> it should be subscribed by me
[18:57] <nigelb> I subscribed us to over 1000 bugs, adding tag would have generated huge deal of mails
[18:57] <bencrisford> Yeah it is :)
[18:57] <bencrisford> oh ok
[18:57] <nigelb> Its for a wider plan to clear all bugs with patches by maverick release
[19:07] <bencrisford> nigelb: cool :)


[04:21] <nisshh> im interested in seeing how many people download the next version of the manual compared to lucid e1 :)
[04:21] <nisshh> should be very interesting
[04:29] <godbyk> Yeah, it will be.
[04:34] <nisshh> yeah
[20:37] <trijntje> Hi all, any news on the quickshot server (or how I can take a screenshot 'manually'), the dutch translation team is dying to release e1, but we still need 1 screenshot
[21:02] <godbyk> flan: Have you had a chance to setup lucid-e1 on the new quickshot server? And is the new quickshot program available for trijntje to use?
[21:35] <jenkins> has anyone managed to share their wireless signal over bluetooth to an android phone or any phone?
[23:22] <flan> godbyk, trijntje, yes, it's available.
[23:23] <flan> But you can just take the screenshot with the Gnome screenshot utility and then upload that, with the proper name.
[23:23] <flan> It may be easier if you opnly have one.
[23:23] <flan> only*
[23:23] <trijntje> flan, can I find an example on the server of the screenshot I need? Its the first one, I think its of some step in the installation?
[23:24] <flan> Sure thing.
[23:24] <flan> I'll send you an archive of all the accepted screenshots for a language... German good with you?
[23:24] <trijntje> sure ;)
[23:25] <trijntje> but does the server work? I need to go to a live system anyway to capture the install
[23:25] <flan> Actually, it might be easier if you just grab the archive directly from godbyk's mirror.
[23:26] <flan> http://screenshots.ubuntu-manual.org/data/de.zip
[23:27] <flan> Just find the one you're missing, then capture it using the Gnome screenshot utility, give it the same filename, and DCC it to one of  (me, godbyk, jenkins) and we'll put it where it needs to go.
[23:27] <flan> The new server requires the new client; the old server's retired.
[23:27] <flan> It's just dying a slow death.
[23:28] <flan> one of us*
[23:29] <trijntje> hm, looks like nl needs 20 screenshots..
[23:29] <flan> Oh. Well, that's considerably more work.
[23:30] <flan> Willing to be among the first to help test the new system?
[23:30] <flan> I can work with godbyk to move over the partially complete nl screenshots.
[23:30] <godbyk> flan: I'm happy to help. Just let me know what you need.
[23:31] <trijntje> flan, i'm also happy to help, but not today, its late in my timezone ;)
[23:31] <flan> Actually, I don't need anything more than permission to do mean things to your bandwidth.
[23:32] <godbyk> flan: Ah, in that case, have at it!
[23:32] <flan> (Generate partial zipfiles and download them using the general lack of security in the old model)
[23:32] <flan> (Then just unpack them into the proper paths on my server)
[23:33] <trijntje> ill pop back here tomorrow to hear what i'm testing, goodnigth for now


[00:01] <guiverc> I've found 20.04.2 ML ; readying for fridge..  https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-announce/2021-February/000264.html
[00:08] <guiverc> will do so shortly... logging out as session annoying me..
[00:43] <guiverc> ubuntu 20.04.2 release needs review please (ubuntu fridge)
[00:56] <krytarik> guiverc: Ok, logging in..
[01:07] <krytarik> guiverc: I fixed the codeness of the URLs and the flipping on and off of italics in the footer line, but I think it's ok now.
[01:09] <guiverc> thank you krytarik ;  yeah I copy & pasted footer from 20.04.1, then copy/pasted updated details in.. forgot about italic mess that creates
[01:09] <guiverc> Thanks, appreciated :)
[01:09] <krytarik> Same!
[01:10] <guiverc> https://fridge.ubuntu.com/2021/02/05/ubuntu-20-04-2-lts-released/
[01:36] -SwissBot:#ubuntu-news- ::Planet:: The Fridge: Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS released. @ https://fridge.ubuntu.com/2021/02/05/ubuntu-20-04-2-lts-released/
[03:10] -SwissBot:#ubuntu-news- ::Security:: Episode 102 @ https://ubuntusecuritypodcast.org/episode-102/
[07:17] -SwissBot:#ubuntu-news- ::Planet:: Full Circle Magazine: Full Circle Weekly News #198 @ https://fullcirclemagazine.org/podcast/full-circle-weekly-news-198/
[10:58] -SwissBot:#ubuntu-news- ::Planet:: Ubuntu Blog: Portainer recommends MicroK8s for effortless deployment @ https://ubuntu.com//blog/portainer-recommends-microk8s
[11:57] -SwissBot:#ubuntu-news- ::Fridge:: Ubuntu 20.04.2 LTS released. @ https://fridge.ubuntu.com/2021/02/05/ubuntu-20-04-2-lts-released/ (by guiverc)
[17:44] -SwissBot:#ubuntu-news- ::Planet:: Alan Pope: Pitchforks set to Stun @ https://popey.com/blog/2021/02/pitchforks-set-to-stun/
[18:14] -SwissBot:#ubuntu-news- ::Planet:: Stephen Michael Kellat: Lay Down The Pitchfork @ http://coyote.works//posts/RVSC20210205/
[20:34] -SwissBot:#ubuntu-news- ::Planet:: Ubuntu Blog: AI in telecom: an overview for data scientists @ https://ubuntu.com//blog/ai-in-telecom-an-overview-for-data-scientists
[20:38] <krytarik> guiverc: Oh hi!  I've only noticed after going offline yesterday that you seem to have put a period at the end of the 20.04.2 post title on the Fridge - since removing that won't have any effect on the post URL, would you like to do that? >_<
[22:25] <guiverc> yeah I felt it was better with the period..    "." removed now krytarik  (now matches 20.04.1 without period & exact to upstream/ML)
[22:27] <krytarik> Ah, ok.  But yeah, it diverted from both prior posts and the announcement.
[23:31] -SwissBot:#ubuntu-news- ::Planet:: Kubuntu General News: Kubuntu 20.04.2 LTS Update Available @ https://kubuntu.org/news/kubuntu-20-04-2-lts-update-available/


[18:46] <jediorder> Ei
[18:46] <jediorder> oops
[18:51] <jediorder> what's the best route to send feature suggestions?
[18:52] <OvenWerks> not sure
[18:52] <OvenWerks> I may be able to tell you if an idea makes sense or is possible.
[18:53] <jediorder> OvenWerks, ok, cool. I'll brb.
[18:59] <jediorder> ove
[18:59] <jediorder> OvenWerks, I'm not sure where I saw it, but there's something called night control or something like and I think I saw it on the Ubuntu desktop where it controls the color of the screen to change to a warmer tone for night viewing.
[19:00] <jediorder> and it's a feature that's already added to the OS. is that something that studio's going to have or already does? I haven't had the chance to check out Studio again in a couple of weeks.
[19:01] <OvenWerks> jediorder: that would be (I expect) a part of gnome sreen which the ubuntu desktop uses
[19:01] <jediorder> most of the time i've had to install a separate snap to control the color change
[19:02] <jediorder> OvenWerks, oh ok.
[19:02] <OvenWerks> Studio uses xfce
[19:02] <jediorder> oh yeah, I know.
[19:02] <OvenWerks> so you would want to see if it can be added to xfce or if a dual theme could do that
[19:03] <OvenWerks> Or it would of course be possible to install Studio on top of ubuntu via ubuntustudio-installer
[19:03] <jediorder> OvenWerks, not sure what dual theme means but just having the feature added to xfce'd be a cool thing
[19:04] <jediorder> oh yeah, I forgot about that
[19:04] <jediorder> installing studio on top of ubuntu
[19:04] <OvenWerks> I, personally, find the gnome screen desktop a pain to use, but then I tend to use a lot of windows at a time.
[19:05] <OvenWerks> I also find I use a menu a lot and ubuntu feels nobody uses those any more
[19:05] <jediorder> OvenWerks, yeah, the one issue i've got with the gnome screen is that it doesn't have a whisker menu like xfce. i love the whisker menu so much better because of the organization of the software
[19:07] <OvenWerks> While it is possible to add a menu plugin to gnome, I have not found any that actually deal properly with submenus (sub sub menus?)
[19:07] <OvenWerks> the vanilla ubuntu desktop assumes the computer will b e used for browsing and maybe the odd game.
[20:24] <mrz80> Hey folks...  I'm looking at getting larger keyboard to replace my Launchkey25. Any thoughts on an Arturia Keystep Essential 61 vs Novation Launchkey 61? With shipping they'd both be about the same, and they both look about equally capable.
[20:35] <jediorder> mrz80, not sure if I'm stepping on the toes of the admins here but discussing keyboards isn't really the topic of this channel. this topic'd be better suited for #ubuntustudio-offtopic
[20:35] <mrz80> Ok, didn't know 'bout that group.
[20:36] <mrz80> I tend to lump everything not guitar related into Ubuntu Studio in my head 'cause it's all connected to my music computer at home :D
[20:37] <jediorder> mrz80, it's ok. it happens. that's why we're here to kindly direct you where you should take certain topics to discuss. helps keep the channel on point as much as possible.
[20:40] <Eickmeyer[m]> mrz80: Another good one is #ubuntu-offtopic. Those people will discuss just about anything, but don't expect technical support as that's off-limits there.
[20:42] <Eickmeyer[m]> jediorder: You're good. As far as a theme switcher, that's outside of the scope of Ubuntu Studio, though it might be a good suggestion for the Xfce folk. As far as gnome desktop goes, there is an extension that does that.
[20:42] <mrz80> Just came across a really interesting VST JX-8p emulator that I'm installing on the U.Studio laptop right now.
[20:44] <jediorder> Eickmeyer[m], yeah, i'm going to relay my feature request over to the XFCE folks soon. oh, and so you know who you're talking to here, it's charlie. i used to go by carbonzero. i decided to change my username to something more me. lol
[20:47] <Eickmeyer[m]> OH HEY jediorder/Charlie!!!!!!!
[20:49] <jediorder> Eickmeyer[m], hey my friend!
[23:39] <popey_> hello team!
[23:39] <popey_> I just install ubuntu studio on my x220 as a test for 20.04
[23:39] <popey_> Great success!
[23:39] <guiverc> G'day popey_
[23:40] <popey_> Smile, you're on YouTube :D


[00:45] <mhall119> cjohnston: https://code.launchpad.net/~mhall119/loco-directory/fix-team-details-webchat-showing/+merge/47489
[01:33] <nigelb> ouch
[01:34] <nigelb> sorry cjohnston
[01:57] <nigelb> mhall119: where is the test site?
[01:57] <nigelb> I've got the whole day free...
[05:13] <AtomicSpark> paultag: You be trollin' on your blogs?
[06:04] <mhall119> nigelb: http://family.ubuntu-fl.org:8000
[06:06] <nigelb> mhall119: will test :D
[08:18] <dholbach> good morning
[08:26] <YoBoY> bonjour
[08:26] <dholbach> salut YoBoY
[08:26] <YoBoY> comment ça va dholbach ?
[08:27] <dholbach> ça va bien, merci beaucoup
[08:27] <dholbach> hey dpm, leoquant
[08:27] <dpm> hey dholbach :)
[08:29] <leoquant> hi UndiFineD dholbach  dpm
[08:30] <dholbach> YoBoY, et toi?
[08:32] <YoBoY> dholbach: bien aussi
[08:37] <dpm> hey all, hey leoquant :)
[12:30] <mhall119> morning
[12:30] <cjohnston> hi
[12:30] <mhall119> cjohnston: will you be able to review my webchat fix?
[12:31] <cjohnston> gonna try before i have to leave
[12:31] <mhall119> cool, thanks
[12:31] <cjohnston> class all day :-(
[12:32] <mhall119> fun
[12:33] <cjohnston> did you already merge it into f.u-fl.o?
[12:33] <cjohnston> mhall119: ^
[12:35] <cjohnston> it looks like you did.. mhall119 if thats true, go on and merge it in.
[12:35] <cjohnston> if you wanna look at https://code.launchpad.net/~ronnie.vd.c/loco-directory/707572-link-add-agenda/+merge/47468 real quick since its done and merge it in, thatd be cool too
[12:37] <nigelb> o/
[12:37] <cjohnston> theres the trouble
[12:37] <nigelb> haha
[12:37] <nigelb> How was the little guy's birthday?
[12:37] <cjohnston> good
[12:38] <cjohnston> he got some dinasours
[12:38] <nigelb> :)
[12:38] <cjohnston> and... umm... mcdonalds gift cards... and... i dont remember
[12:38] <cjohnston> they got most of their stuff at christmas
[12:40] <nigelb> :)
[13:17] <mhall119> cjohnston: yes, it's on f.u-fl.org, merging now
[13:26] <mhall119> Ronnie: should have been {% if user_is_team_member %} not {% if is_member %}
[13:26] <mhall119> I changed it and merged
[13:26] <Ronnie> mhall119: great !
[13:28] <mhall119> cjohnston: ready to deploy when you are
[13:33] <cjohnston-cell> mhall119, awesome
[17:40]  * mhall119 kicks evolution
[17:40] <mhall119> hard
[17:41] <mhall119> then backs up everything
[19:10] <mhall119> so...interviewing for your new manager is interesting
[19:10] <nigelb> heh
[19:13] <nigelb> mhall119: Its bound to be entertaining
[19:13] <nigelb> mhall119: Did you ask him trick quetsions? ;)
[19:13] <nigelb> s/him/him/\her
[19:17] <mhall119> her
[19:17] <mhall119> and yeah, kind of
[19:17] <mhall119> I've never interviewed someone for a manager position before, so I wasn't sure exactly what to ask
[22:39] <cjohnston> mhall119: I'm gonna push it then
[22:46] <cjohnston> mhall119: the translations exporter is broken, hense the long wait time
[23:03] <mhall119> yeah, i checked it today and it had even longer to wait than yesterday


[00:33] <maxj> Hi all! I emailed cjwatso/n who very helpfully informed me about the existence of dogfood.paddev.net. I'm trying to register my pgp key there but can't because the server doesn't send external email -- could someone please help me finish registering a pgp key for user "~h-max-8"?
[01:06] <maxj> also, just wondering what a good time to hang around this channel is? I would love to get myself successfully uploading packages to a ppa on dogfood. I hope I can be helpful somehow in return!
[11:35] <cjwatson> maxj: roughly EU business hours is usually good (when it's not a long weekend for most of us, as is the case at the moment)
[11:37] <cjwatson> maxj: I think the staging email redirection is broken right now so email from dogfood is going into a black hole at the moment even for developers.  Do you have a corresponding account on production?  I could copy over the key registration manually if so
[11:37] <cjwatson> maxj: (i.e. on launchpad.net)
[23:18] <maxj> cjwatson: thanks! my production account is ~justicz, and I just added the key there.
[23:19] <maxj> cjwatson: fingerprint B840A6F875A3B4306CFD02B0C7AD6330EC1C0779