#
Token merging

Token merging (ToMe) merges redundant tokens/patches progressively in the forward pass of a Transformer-based network which can speed-up the inference latency of StableDiffusionPipeline.

Install ToMe from `pip`:

    pip install tomesd

You can use ToMe from the `tomesd` library with the `apply_patch` function:

      from diffusers import StableDiffusionPipeline
      import torch
      import tomesd

      pipeline = StableDiffusionPipeline.from_pretrained(
            "runwayml/stable-diffusion-v1-5", torch_dtype=torch.float16, use_safetensors=True,
      ).to("cuda")
    + tomesd.apply_patch(pipeline, ratio=0.5)

      image = pipeline("a photo of an astronaut riding a horse on mars").images[0]

The `apply_patch` function exposes a number of arguments to help strike a balance between pipeline inference speed and the quality of the generated tokens. The most important argument is `ratio` which controls the number of tokens that are merged during the forward pass.

As reported in the paper, ToMe can greatly preserve the quality of the generated images while boosting inference speed. By increasing the `ratio`, you can speed-up inference even further, but at the cost of some degraded image quality.

To test the quality of the generated images, we sampled a few prompts from Parti Prompts and performed inference with the StableDiffusionPipeline with the following settings:

We didn’t notice any significant decrease in the quality of the generated samples, and you can check out the generated samples in this WandB report. If you’re interested in reproducing this experiment, use this script.

##
Benchmarks

We also benchmarked the impact of `tomesd` on the StableDiffusionPipeline with xFormers enabled across several image resolutions. The results are obtained from A100 and V100 GPUs in the following development environment:

    - `diffusers` version: 0.15.1
    - Python version: 3.8.16
    - PyTorch version (GPU?): 1.13.1+cu116 (True)
    - Huggingface_hub version: 0.13.2
    - Transformers version: 4.27.2
    - Accelerate version: 0.18.0
    - xFormers version: 0.0.16
    - tomesd version: 0.1.2

To reproduce this benchmark, feel free to use this script. The results are reported in seconds, and where applicable we report the speed-up percentage over the vanilla pipeline when using ToMe and ToMe + xFormers.

GPU | Resolution | Batch size | Vanilla | ToMe | ToMe + xFormers
--- | --- | --- | --- | --- | ---
A100 | 512 | 10 | 6.88 | 5.26 (+23.55%) | 4.69 (+31.83%)
| 768 | 10 | OOM | 14.71 | 11
|  | 8 | OOM | 11.56 | 8.84
|  | 4 | OOM | 5.98 | 4.66
|  | 2 | 4.99 | 3.24 (+35.07%) | 2.1 (+37.88%)
|  | 1 | 3.29 | 2.24 (+31.91%) | 2.03 (+38.3%)
| 1024 | 10 | OOM | OOM | OOM
|  | 8 | OOM | OOM | OOM
|  | 4 | OOM | 12.51 | 9.09
|  | 2 | OOM | 6.52 | 4.96
|  | 1 | 6.4 | 3.61 (+43.59%) | 2.81 (+56.09%)
V100 | 512 | 10 | OOM | 10.03 | 9.29
|  | 8 | OOM | 8.05 | 7.47
|  | 4 | 5.7 | 4.3 (+24.56%) | 3.98 (+30.18%)
|  | 2 | 3.14 | 2.43 (+22.61%) | 2.27 (+27.71%)
|  | 1 | 1.88 | 1.57 (+16.49%) | 1.57 (+16.49%)
| 768 | 10 | OOM | OOM | 23.67
|  | 8 | OOM | OOM | 18.81
|  | 4 | OOM | 11.81 | 9.7
|  | 2 | OOM | 6.27 | 5.2
|  | 1 | 5.43 | 3.38 (+37.75%) | 2.82 (+48.07%)
| 1024 | 10 | OOM | OOM | OOM
|  | 8 | OOM | OOM | OOM
|  | 4 | OOM | OOM | 19.35
|  | 2 | OOM | 13 | 10.78
|  | 1 | OOM | 6.66 | 5.54

As seen in the tables above, the speed-up from `tomesd` becomes more pronounced for larger image resolutions. It is also interesting to note that with `tomesd`, it is possible to run the pipeline on a higher resolution like 1024x1024. You may be able to speed-up inference even more with `torch.compile`.

< > Update on GitHub