payload: {"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/1097","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/openjournals/joss-reviews","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/1097/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/1097/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/1097/events","html_url":"https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/1097","id":384337898,"node_id":"MDU6SXNzdWUzODQzMzc4OTg=","number":1097,"title":"[REVIEW]: OApackage: A Python package for generation and analysis of orthogonal arrays and conference designs","user":{"login":"whedon","id":18508068,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjE4NTA4MDY4","avatar_url":"https://avatars3.githubusercontent.com/u/18508068?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/whedon","html_url":"https://github.com/whedon","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/whedon/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/whedon/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/whedon/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/whedon/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/whedon/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/whedon/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/whedon/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/whedon/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/whedon/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[{"id":330465313,"node_id":"MDU6TGFiZWwzMzA0NjUzMTM=","url":"https://api.github.com/repos/openjournals/joss-reviews/labels/review","name":"review","color":"fbca04","default":false}],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":{"login":"danielskatz","id":2913845,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjI5MTM4NDU=","avatar_url":"https://avatars1.githubusercontent.com/u/2913845?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/danielskatz","html_url":"https://github.com/danielskatz","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danielskatz/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danielskatz/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danielskatz/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danielskatz/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danielskatz/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danielskatz/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danielskatz/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danielskatz/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danielskatz/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"assignees":[{"login":"danielskatz","id":2913845,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjI5MTM4NDU=","avatar_url":"https://avatars1.githubusercontent.com/u/2913845?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/danielskatz","html_url":"https://github.com/danielskatz","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danielskatz/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danielskatz/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danielskatz/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danielskatz/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danielskatz/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danielskatz/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danielskatz/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danielskatz/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/danielskatz/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false}],"milestone":null,"comments":70,"created_at":"2018-11-26T13:46:39Z","updated_at":"2019-02-27T14:13:26Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"COLLABORATOR","body":"**Submitting author:** @eendebakpt (<a href=\"http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7018-1124\">Pieter Eendebak</a>)\r\n**Repository:** <a href=\"https://github.com/eendebakpt/oapackage\" target =\"_blank\">https://github.com/eendebakpt/oapackage</a>\r\n**Version:** 2.6.3\n**Editor:** @danielskatz\r\n**Reviewer:** @djmitche, @gsagnol\r\n**Archive:** <a href=\"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2579025\" target=\"_blank\">10.5281/zenodo.2579025</a>\n\r\n## Status\r\n\r\n[![status](http://joss.theoj.org/papers/452707998bc50b787c0ba41cf544b1c3/status.svg)](http://joss.theoj.org/papers/452707998bc50b787c0ba41cf544b1c3)\r\n\r\nStatus badge code:\r\n\r\n```\r\nHTML: <a href=\"http://joss.theoj.org/papers/452707998bc50b787c0ba41cf544b1c3\"><img src=\"http://joss.theoj.org/papers/452707998bc50b787c0ba41cf544b1c3/status.svg\"></a>\r\nMarkdown: [![status](http://joss.theoj.org/papers/452707998bc50b787c0ba41cf544b1c3/status.svg)](http://joss.theoj.org/papers/452707998bc50b787c0ba41cf544b1c3)\r\n```\r\n**Reviewers and authors**:\r\n\r\nPlease avoid lengthy details of difficulties in the review thread. Instead, please create a new issue in the <a href=\"https://github.com/eendebakpt/oapackage\" target=\"_blank\">target repository</a> and link to those issues (especially acceptance-blockers) in the review thread below. (For completists: if the target issue tracker is also on GitHub, linking the review thread in the issue or vice versa will create corresponding breadcrumb trails in the link target.)\r\n\r\n## Reviewer instructions & questions\r\n\r\n@djmitche & @ gsagnol, please carry out your review in this issue by updating the checklist below. If you cannot edit the checklist please:\r\n1. Make sure you're logged in to your GitHub account\r\n2. Be sure to accept the invite at this URL: https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/invitations\r\n\r\nThe reviewer guidelines are available here: https://joss.theoj.org/about#reviewer_guidelines. Any questions/concerns please let @danielskatz know.\r\n\r\n✨ **Please try and complete your review in the next two weeks** ✨ \r\n\r\n## Review checklist for @djmitche\r\n### Conflict of interest\r\n\r\n- [x] As the reviewer I confirm that I have read the [JOSS conflict of interest policy](https://github.com/openjournals/joss/blob/master/COI.md) and that there are no conflicts of interest for me to review this work.\r\n\r\n### Code of Conduct\r\n\r\n- [x] I confirm that I read and will adhere to the [JOSS code of conduct](https://joss.theoj.org/about#code_of_conduct).\r\n\r\n### General checks\r\n\r\n- [x] **Repository:** Is the source code for this software available at the <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https://github.com/eendebakpt/oapackage\">repository url</a>?\r\n- [x] **License:** Does the repository contain a plain-text LICENSE file with the contents of an [OSI approved](https://opensource.org/licenses/alphabetical) software license?\r\n- [x] **Version:** 2.6.3\n- [x] **Authorship:** Has the submitting author (@eendebakpt) made major contributions to the software? Does the full list of paper authors seem appropriate and complete?\r\n\r\n### Functionality\r\n\r\n- [x] **Installation:** Does installation proceed as outlined in the documentation?\r\n- [x] **Functionality:** Have the functional claims of the software been confirmed?\r\n- [x] **Performance:** If there are any performance claims of the software, have they been confirmed? (If there are no claims, please check off this item.)\r\n\r\n### Documentation\r\n\r\n- [x] **A statement of need:** Do the authors clearly state what problems the software is designed to solve and who the target audience is?\r\n- [x] **Installation instructions:** Is there a clearly-stated list of dependencies? Ideally these should be handled with an automated package management solution.\r\n- [x] **Example usage:** Do the authors include examples of how to use the software (ideally to solve real-world analysis problems).\r\n- [x] **Functionality documentation:** Is the core functionality of the software documented to a satisfactory level (e.g., API method documentation)?\r\n- [x] **Automated tests:** Are there automated tests or manual steps described so that the function of the software can be verified?\r\n- [x] **Community guidelines:** Are there clear guidelines for third parties wishing to 1) Contribute to the software 2) Report issues or problems with the software 3) Seek support\r\n\r\n### Software paper\r\n\r\n- [x] **Authors:** Does the `paper.md` file include a list of authors with their affiliations?\r\n- [x] **A statement of need:** Do the authors clearly state what problems the software is designed to solve and who the target audience is?\r\n- [x] **References:** Do all archival references that should have a DOI list one (e.g., papers, datasets, software)?\r\n\r\n## Review checklist for @gsagnol\r\n### Conflict of interest\r\n\r\n- [x] As the reviewer I confirm that I have read the [JOSS conflict of interest policy](https://github.com/openjournals/joss/blob/master/COI.md) and that there are no conflicts of interest for me to review this work.\r\n\r\n### Code of Conduct\r\n\r\n- [x] I confirm that I read and will adhere to the [JOSS code of conduct](https://joss.theoj.org/about#code_of_conduct).\r\n\r\n### General checks\r\n\r\n- [x] **Repository:** Is the source code for this software available at the <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https://github.com/eendebakpt/oapackage\">repository url</a>?\r\n- [x] **License:** Does the repository contain a plain-text LICENSE file with the contents of an [OSI approved](https://opensource.org/licenses/alphabetical) software license?\r\n- [x] **Version:** 2.6.3\n- [x] **Authorship:** Has the submitting author (@eendebakpt) made major contributions to the software? Does the full list of paper authors seem appropriate and complete?\r\n\r\n### Functionality\r\n\r\n- [x] **Installation:** Does installation proceed as outlined in the documentation?\r\n- [x] **Functionality:** Have the functional claims of the software been confirmed?\r\n- [x] **Performance:** If there are any performance claims of the software, have they been confirmed? (If there are no claims, please check off this item.)\r\n\r\n### Documentation\r\n\r\n- [x] **A statement of need:** Do the authors clearly state what problems the software is designed to solve and who the target audience is?\r\n- [x] **Installation instructions:** Is there a clearly-stated list of dependencies? Ideally these should be handled with an automated package management solution.\r\n- [x] **Example usage:** Do the authors include examples of how to use the software (ideally to solve real-world analysis problems).\r\n- [x] **Functionality documentation:** Is the core functionality of the software documented to a satisfactory level (e.g., API method documentation)?\r\n- [x] **Automated tests:** Are there automated tests or manual steps described so that the function of the software can be verified?\r\n- [x] **Community guidelines:** Are there clear guidelines for third parties wishing to 1) Contribute to the software 2) Report issues or problems with the software 3) Seek support\r\n\r\n### Software paper\r\n\r\n- [x] **Authors:** Does the `paper.md` file include a list of authors with their affiliations?\r\n- [x] **A statement of need:** Do the authors clearly state what problems the software is designed to solve and who the target audience is?\r\n- [x] **References:** Do all archival references that should have a DOI list one (e.g., papers, datasets, software)?\r\n\r\n"},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/comments/467876456","html_url":"https://github.com/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/1097#issuecomment-467876456","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/openjournals/joss-reviews/issues/1097","id":467876456,"node_id":"MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDQ2Nzg3NjQ1Ng==","user":{"login":"whedon","id":18508068,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjE4NTA4MDY4","avatar_url":"https://avatars3.githubusercontent.com/u/18508068?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/whedon","html_url":"https://github.com/whedon","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/whedon/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/whedon/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/whedon/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/whedon/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/whedon/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/whedon/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/whedon/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/whedon/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/whedon/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2019-02-27T14:13:26Z","updated_at":"2019-02-27T14:13:26Z","author_association":"COLLABORATOR","body":"```\nAttempting dry run of processing paper acceptance...\n```"}}
other: {"actor":{"display_login":"whedon"}}