payload: {"action":"created","issue":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/QUIC-Tracker/quic-tracker/issues/17","repository_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/QUIC-Tracker/quic-tracker","labels_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/QUIC-Tracker/quic-tracker/issues/17/labels{/name}","comments_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/QUIC-Tracker/quic-tracker/issues/17/comments","events_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/QUIC-Tracker/quic-tracker/issues/17/events","html_url":"https://github.com/QUIC-Tracker/quic-tracker/issues/17","id":515406559,"node_id":"MDU6SXNzdWU1MTU0MDY1NTk=","number":17,"title":"New test: multi-packet ClientHello","user":{"login":"ghedo","id":117643,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjExNzY0Mw==","avatar_url":"https://avatars3.githubusercontent.com/u/117643?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/ghedo","html_url":"https://github.com/ghedo","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ghedo/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ghedo/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ghedo/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ghedo/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ghedo/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ghedo/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ghedo/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ghedo/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/ghedo/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"labels":[],"state":"open","locked":false,"assignee":null,"assignees":[],"milestone":null,"comments":3,"created_at":"2019-10-31T12:48:58Z","updated_at":"2019-11-06T09:36:06Z","closed_at":null,"author_association":"CONTRIBUTOR","body":"The next draft will allow splitting ClientHello messages across Initial packets, so it'd be nice if quic-tracker had a test for it. For example, the TLS padding extension could be added to the ClientHello message by quic-tracker such that the message would be bigger than MTU.\r\n\r\nIt would also be nice if quic-tracker could swap those packets (send second packet first, then the first one after a delay), to see if the server can process that."},"comment":{"url":"https://api.github.com/repos/QUIC-Tracker/quic-tracker/issues/comments/550227054","html_url":"https://github.com/QUIC-Tracker/quic-tracker/issues/17#issuecomment-550227054","issue_url":"https://api.github.com/repos/QUIC-Tracker/quic-tracker/issues/17","id":550227054,"node_id":"MDEyOklzc3VlQ29tbWVudDU1MDIyNzA1NA==","user":{"login":"mpiraux","id":7137742,"node_id":"MDQ6VXNlcjcxMzc3NDI=","avatar_url":"https://avatars2.githubusercontent.com/u/7137742?v=4","gravatar_id":"","url":"https://api.github.com/users/mpiraux","html_url":"https://github.com/mpiraux","followers_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mpiraux/followers","following_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mpiraux/following{/other_user}","gists_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mpiraux/gists{/gist_id}","starred_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mpiraux/starred{/owner}{/repo}","subscriptions_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mpiraux/subscriptions","organizations_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mpiraux/orgs","repos_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mpiraux/repos","events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mpiraux/events{/privacy}","received_events_url":"https://api.github.com/users/mpiraux/received_events","type":"User","site_admin":false},"created_at":"2019-11-06T09:36:05Z","updated_at":"2019-11-06T09:36:05Z","author_association":"MEMBER","body":"I wrote a quick test to cut my existing CRYPTO frame in half and send it in two pieces, padded with PADDING frames. That's good enough to test whether implementations buffer out-of-order Initials IMO. \r\n\r\nI could add another test for the following MUST though:\r\n\r\n> 7.4.  Cryptographic Message Buffering\r\n> ...\r\n> Implementations MUST support buffering at least 4096 bytes of data\r\n> received in CRYPTO frames out of order.\r\nIn that case I will probably add that QUIC TP."}}
other: {"actor":{"display_login":"mpiraux"}}