context: On the other hand, the Husses reside in Mississippi, and Barbara has suffered harm chiefly in that state. On balance, we believe that the "center of gravity" in this case is in Tennessee, and that Mississippi does not have a more significant relationship to the case.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 849 F.2d 639, 642-43
citation_a.parenthetical: applying Restatement and holding that where patient-physician relationship was based in Maryland, Maryland law applied to D.C. resident's medical malpractice claim
citation_a.sentence: See, e.g., Bledsoe v. Crowley, 849 F.2d 639, 642-43 (D.C.Cir.1988) (applying Restatement and holding that where patient-physician relationship was based in Maryland, Maryland law applied to D.C. resident’s medical malpractice claim); cf. Denman, 131 F.3d at 549 (“Under Mississippi law, the substantive law of the place of injury controls unless another state has a more significant relationship to the occurrence and the parties.”) (citation omitted).
citation_b.signal: cf.
citation_b.identifier: 131 F.3d 549, 549
citation_b.parenthetical: "Under Mississippi law, the substantive law of the place of injury controls unless another state has a more significant relationship to the occurrence and the parties."
citation_b.sentence: See, e.g., Bledsoe v. Crowley, 849 F.2d 639, 642-43 (D.C.Cir.1988) (applying Restatement and holding that where patient-physician relationship was based in Maryland, Maryland law applied to D.C. resident’s medical malpractice claim); cf. Denman, 131 F.3d at 549 (“Under Mississippi law, the substantive law of the place of injury controls unless another state has a more significant relationship to the occurrence and the parties.”) (citation omitted).