context: This is not a new rule. "For more than 35 years, this court has declined to entertain appeals when the appellant does not file a required appendix."
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 281 F.2d 775, 778
citation_a.parenthetical: failure to include in appendix all parts of record and transcript necessary to present any error justifies refusal to consider same
citation_a.sentence: See also Morrison v. Texas Co., 289 F.2d 382, 384 (7th Cir.1961) (court has power to dismiss appeal or affirm judgment due to appellant’s disregard of appendix rule by failing to delineate relevant portions of district court record from which appeal was taken); Potomac Ins. Co. v. Stanley, 281 F.2d 775, 778 (7th Cir.1960) (failure to include in appendix all parts of record and transcript necessary to present any error justifies refusal to consider same).
citation_b.signal: no signal
citation_b.identifier: 72 F.3d 59, 61
citation_b.parenthetical: failure to provide district court's explanation for refusal to award attorneys' fees to taxpayer prevented appellate review of that issue, citing numerous decisions, including Gomez and Mortell
citation_b.sentence: Urso v. United States, 72 F.3d 59, 61 (7th Cir.1995) (failure to provide district court’s explanation for refusal to award attorneys’ fees to taxpayer prevented appellate review of that issue, citing numerous decisions, including Gomez and Mortell).