context: The emphasized portion of $ 18-8-208.1(2) has been interpreted as requiring that sentences imposed for attempted escape convictions run consecutive to the sentence for the "underlying felony."
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 746 P.2d 1381, 1385
citation_a.parenthetical: "General Assembly intended that a defendant must serve a consecutive sentence for' the substantive crime of escape, whether completed or not"
citation_a.sentence: People v. Andrews, 871 P.2d 1199, 1203 (Colo.1994); see also People v. Akers, 746 P.2d 1381, 1385 (Colo.App.1987) ("General Assembly intended that a defendant must serve a consecutive sentence for' the substantive crime of escape, whether completed or not"); but see People v. Martines, 703 P.2d 619, 620 (Colo.App.1985) (interpreting § 18-8-208.1 as requiring that the sentence imposed for an attempted escape conviction run consecutive to "the term defendant was serving at the time of the escape").
citation_b.signal: but see
citation_b.identifier: 703 P.2d 619, 620
citation_b.parenthetical: interpreting SS 18-8-208.1 as requiring that the sentence imposed for an attempted escape conviction run consecutive to "the term defendant was serving at the time of the escape"
citation_b.sentence: People v. Andrews, 871 P.2d 1199, 1203 (Colo.1994); see also People v. Akers, 746 P.2d 1381, 1385 (Colo.App.1987) ("General Assembly intended that a defendant must serve a consecutive sentence for' the substantive crime of escape, whether completed or not"); but see People v. Martines, 703 P.2d 619, 620 (Colo.App.1985) (interpreting § 18-8-208.1 as requiring that the sentence imposed for an attempted escape conviction run consecutive to "the term defendant was serving at the time of the escape").