context: L. c. 93A damages, and the question of G. L. c. 93A relief has not been committed to it. See G. The question whether Columbia submitted unreasonable bills to Trust, based on the furnishing of unneeded chiropractic services or an overcharging for such services, is not a complicated issue calling for agency expertise.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 396 Mass. 643, 649-650
citation_a.parenthetical: question whether disciplinary rule was violated within province of jury
citation_a.sentence: See also Fishman v. Brooks, 396 Mass. 643, 649-650 (1986) (question whether disciplinary rule was violated within province of jury). We see no merit in Columbia’s belated assertion that Trust may not press its claim of unfair or deceptive acts or practices based on the very facts that are in dispute in the claims that Columbia asserts against Trust.
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 383 Mass. 739, 743
citation_b.parenthetical: reasonableness and necessity of medical bills appropriately for trier of fact
citation_b.sentence: See Vieira v. Schupp, 383 Mass. 739, 743 (1981) (reasonableness and necessity of medical bills appropriately for trier of fact); Victum v. Martin, 367 Mass. 404, 410 (1975) (same).