context: A losing bidder seeking to interfere with a government procurement must meet a high burden.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 78 F.3d 1556, 1562
citation_a.parenthetical: ruling that a "protester must show not only a significant error in the procurement process, but also that the error prejudiced it."
citation_a.sentence: See, e.g., Banknote Corp., 365 F.3d at 1351; Advanced Data Concepts, Inc. v. United States, 216 F.3d 1054, 1058 (Fed.Cir.2000) (noting that the “arbitrary and capricious standard ... is highly differential ... [and] requires a reviewing court to sustain an agency action evincing rational reasoning and consideration of relevant factors.”); see also Data Gen. Corp. v. Johnson, 78 F.3d 1556, 1562 (Fed.Cir.1996) (ruling that a “protester must show not only a significant error in the procurement process, but also that the error prejudiced it.”).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 216 F.3d 1054, 1058
citation_b.parenthetical: noting that the "arbitrary and capricious standard ... is highly differential ... [and] requires a reviewing court to sustain an agency action evincing rational reasoning and consideration of relevant factors."
citation_b.sentence: See, e.g., Banknote Corp., 365 F.3d at 1351; Advanced Data Concepts, Inc. v. United States, 216 F.3d 1054, 1058 (Fed.Cir.2000) (noting that the “arbitrary and capricious standard ... is highly differential ... [and] requires a reviewing court to sustain an agency action evincing rational reasoning and consideration of relevant factors.”); see also Data Gen. Corp. v. Johnson, 78 F.3d 1556, 1562 (Fed.Cir.1996) (ruling that a “protester must show not only a significant error in the procurement process, but also that the error prejudiced it.”).