context: The record, however, does not support this claim. The bare representation of counsel as to Tirrell's fear of Walpole does not make out coercion different in kind or degree from the inevitable decision-making pressures described above.
citation_a.signal: cf.
citation_a.identifier: 431 U.S. 63, 74
citation_a.parenthetical: defendant's declaration in open court carries strong presumption of verity and court may dismiss subsequent unsupported conclusory allegations of coercion
citation_a.sentence: Cf. Blackledge v. Allison, 431 U.S. 63, 74 (1977) (defendant’s declaration in open court carries strong presumption of verity and court may dismiss subsequent unsupported conclusory allegations of coercion).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 584 F.2d 687, 690
citation_b.parenthetical: coercion established if fear of greater penalty destroyed defendant's ability to weigh relative advantages of trial and plea
citation_b.sentence: See Jones v. Estelle, 584 F.2d 687, 690 (5th Cir. 1978) (coercion established if fear of greater penalty destroyed defendant’s ability to weigh relative advantages of trial and plea).