context: However, it has been well-established that Bivens is not applicable for the purposes of asserting a constitutional claim against a private corporate entity. See Corr. Servs.
citation_a.signal: no signal
citation_a.parenthetical: foreclosing the extension of a Bivens remedy to the context of employer liability
citation_a.sentence: Corp. v. Malesko, 534 U.S. 61, 122 S.Ct. 515, 151 L.Ed.2d 456 (2001) (foreclosing the extension of a Bivens remedy to the context of employer liability); see also Stoutt v. Banco Popular de P.R., 320 F.3d 26, 33 (1st Cir.2003) (holding that no Bivens claim existed against a defendant bank that supplied information required by law to the Federal Bureau of Investigations).
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.identifier: 320 F.3d 26, 33
citation_b.parenthetical: holding that no Bivens claim existed against a defendant bank that supplied information required by law to the Federal Bureau of Investigations
citation_b.sentence: Corp. v. Malesko, 534 U.S. 61, 122 S.Ct. 515, 151 L.Ed.2d 456 (2001) (foreclosing the extension of a Bivens remedy to the context of employer liability); see also Stoutt v. Banco Popular de P.R., 320 F.3d 26, 33 (1st Cir.2003) (holding that no Bivens claim existed against a defendant bank that supplied information required by law to the Federal Bureau of Investigations).