context: The term "reasonably" indicates that an objective standard should apply. The term "reasonably" is not ambiguous.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 959 F.Supp. 1213, 1222
citation_a.parenthetical: "a reasonable person would have foreseen that the conduct alleged ... might form the basis of a claim or suit"
citation_a.sentence: Phoenix Ins. Co. v. Sukut Constr. Co., 136 Cal.App.3d 673, 186 Cal.Rptr. 513, 514 (1982) (in context of professional liability insurance policy, the phrase “might be expected to be the basis of a claim or suit” was unambiguous and “perfectly clear”); see also Coregis Ins. Co. v. Camico Mut. Ins. Co., 959 F.Supp. 1213, 1222 (C.D.Cal.1997) (“a reasonable person would have foreseen that the conduct alleged ... might form the basis of a claim or suit”).
citation_b.signal: no signal
citation_b.identifier: 186 Cal.Rptr. 513, 514
citation_b.parenthetical: in context of professional liability insurance policy, the phrase "might be expected to be the basis of a claim or suit" was unambiguous and "perfectly clear"
citation_b.sentence: Phoenix Ins. Co. v. Sukut Constr. Co., 136 Cal.App.3d 673, 186 Cal.Rptr. 513, 514 (1982) (in context of professional liability insurance policy, the phrase “might be expected to be the basis of a claim or suit” was unambiguous and “perfectly clear”); see also Coregis Ins. Co. v. Camico Mut. Ins. Co., 959 F.Supp. 1213, 1222 (C.D.Cal.1997) (“a reasonable person would have foreseen that the conduct alleged ... might form the basis of a claim or suit”).