context: The Fourth Amendment prohibits "unreasonable searches and seizures." Even a search conducted pursuant to a warrant may be "unreasonable" given the manner in which the search has been conducted.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.parenthetical: "Excessive or unnecessary destruction of property in the course of a search may violate the Fourth Amendment, even though the entry itself is lawful."
citation_a.sentence: See, e.g., United States v. Ramirez, 523 U.S. 65, 71, 118 S.Ct. 992, 140 L.Ed.2d 191 (1998) (“Excessive or unnecessary destruction of property in the course of a search may violate the Fourth Amendment, even though the entry itself is lawful.”); cf. United States v. Young, 877 F.2d 1099, 1105 (1st Cir.1989) (“[Nothing] forbids continuing a search at night, at least when doing so is reasonable.”).
citation_b.signal: cf.
citation_b.identifier: 877 F.2d 1099, 1105
citation_b.parenthetical: "[Nothing] forbids continuing a search at night, at least when doing so is reasonable."
citation_b.sentence: See, e.g., United States v. Ramirez, 523 U.S. 65, 71, 118 S.Ct. 992, 140 L.Ed.2d 191 (1998) (“Excessive or unnecessary destruction of property in the course of a search may violate the Fourth Amendment, even though the entry itself is lawful.”); cf. United States v. Young, 877 F.2d 1099, 1105 (1st Cir.1989) (“[Nothing] forbids continuing a search at night, at least when doing so is reasonable.”).