context: Generally, a prisoner has a protected liberty interest in remaining in the general population.
citation_a.signal: no signal
citation_a.parenthetical: holding that placing a prisoner in disciplinary confinement clearly effects liberty interest
citation_a.sentence: Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 94 S.Ct. 2963, 41 L.Ed.2d 935 (1974) (holding that placing a prisoner in disciplinary confinement clearly effects liberty interest); See Parker v. Cook, 642 F.2d 865, 867-68 (5th Cir.1981) (holding that the due process clause protects only those liberty interests created by the state.)
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 642 F.2d 865, 867-68
citation_b.parenthetical: holding that the due process clause protects only those liberty interests created by the state.
citation_b.sentence: Wolff v. McDonnell, 418 U.S. 539, 94 S.Ct. 2963, 41 L.Ed.2d 935 (1974) (holding that placing a prisoner in disciplinary confinement clearly effects liberty interest); See Parker v. Cook, 642 F.2d 865, 867-68 (5th Cir.1981) (holding that the due process clause protects only those liberty interests created by the state.)