context: The district court properly concluded that Title VII and the Rehabilitation Act ("RA") were Miller's exclusive remedies for claims of discrimination in federal employment.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 64 F.3d 1421, 1424
citation_a.parenthetical: Title VII's exclusivity regarding discrimination on the basis of sex also applies to discrimination on the basis of gender
citation_a.sentence: See Boyd v. U.S. Postal Serv., 752 F.2d 410, 413-14 (9th Cir.1985) (Title VII is the exclusive remedy for discrimination by the federal government on the basis of sex, and the RA is the exclusive remedy for discrimination by the federal government on the basis of disability); see also Brock v. United States, 64 F.3d 1421, 1424 (9th Cir.1995) (Title VII’s exclusivity regarding discrimination on the basis of sex also applies to discrimination on the basis of gender); Clemente v. United States, 766 F.2d 1358, 1364 n. 7 (9th Cir.1985) (“To the extent that plaintiffs Bivens claims are founded in actions proscribed by Title VII, they may not be maintained because Title VII provides the exclusive remedy.”).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 752 F.2d 410, 413-14
citation_b.parenthetical: Title VII is the exclusive remedy for discrimination by the federal government on the basis of sex, and the RA is the exclusive remedy for discrimination by the federal government on the basis of disability
citation_b.sentence: See Boyd v. U.S. Postal Serv., 752 F.2d 410, 413-14 (9th Cir.1985) (Title VII is the exclusive remedy for discrimination by the federal government on the basis of sex, and the RA is the exclusive remedy for discrimination by the federal government on the basis of disability); see also Brock v. United States, 64 F.3d 1421, 1424 (9th Cir.1995) (Title VII’s exclusivity regarding discrimination on the basis of sex also applies to discrimination on the basis of gender); Clemente v. United States, 766 F.2d 1358, 1364 n. 7 (9th Cir.1985) (“To the extent that plaintiffs Bivens claims are founded in actions proscribed by Title VII, they may not be maintained because Title VII provides the exclusive remedy.”).