context: We note in conclusion that our decision today aligns us with all but one of the several circuit courts to address this question.
citation_a.signal: no signal
citation_a.parenthetical: requiring "evidence of conduct more egregious than intentional discrimination to support an award of punitive damages in Title VII cases"
citation_a.sentence: Resort Corp., 140 F.3d 1299 (9th Cir.1998) (requiring “evidence of conduct more egregious than intentional discrimination to support an award of punitive damages in Title VII cases”); but see Luciano v. Olsten Corp., 110 F.3d 210, 219-20 (2d Cir.1997) (finding that no additional evidence is required for punitive liability).
citation_b.signal: but see
citation_b.identifier: 110 F.3d 210, 219-20
citation_b.parenthetical: finding that no additional evidence is required for punitive liability
citation_b.sentence: Resort Corp., 140 F.3d 1299 (9th Cir.1998) (requiring “evidence of conduct more egregious than intentional discrimination to support an award of punitive damages in Title VII cases”); but see Luciano v. Olsten Corp., 110 F.3d 210, 219-20 (2d Cir.1997) (finding that no additional evidence is required for punitive liability).