context: In fact, Elsen testified in his deposition that there were LMC documents- "under the control of Barry Carroll in a storage facility at his residence." (R. 256, Pl.'s Resp. to Carroll's Mot. to Strike, Elsen Dep. at 56.) "When a party has produced the document in question in response to a subpoena or discovery request, he has implicitly authenticated the document."
citation_a.signal: no signal
citation_a.identifier: 117 F.3d 1044, 1049
citation_a.parenthetical: admitting evidence where that evidence was found in a criminal raid on a place under a defendant's control and the evidence otherwise appeared to have been belong to the defendant
citation_a.sentence: United States v. Lawrence, 934 F.2d 868, 871-72 (7th Cir.1991); United States v. Harvey, 117 F.3d 1044, 1049 (7th Cir.1997) (admitting evidence where that evidence was found in a criminal raid on a place under a defendant’s control and the evidence otherwise appeared to have been belong to the defendant); see also United States v. Munoz, 16 F.3d 1116, 1121 (11th Cir.1994) (finding that documents may be found authentic where there are discovered in the defen dant’s possession); Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. Jacobson, 644 F.Supp. 1240, 1253 (N.D.Ill.1986).
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.identifier: 16 F.3d 1116, 1121
citation_b.parenthetical: finding that documents may be found authentic where there are discovered in the defen dant's possession
citation_b.sentence: United States v. Lawrence, 934 F.2d 868, 871-72 (7th Cir.1991); United States v. Harvey, 117 F.3d 1044, 1049 (7th Cir.1997) (admitting evidence where that evidence was found in a criminal raid on a place under a defendant’s control and the evidence otherwise appeared to have been belong to the defendant); see also United States v. Munoz, 16 F.3d 1116, 1121 (11th Cir.1994) (finding that documents may be found authentic where there are discovered in the defen dant’s possession); Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. Jacobson, 644 F.Supp. 1240, 1253 (N.D.Ill.1986).