context: As to the second requirement, however, a breach of privilege is usually an insufficient showing of harm, at least under the strict terms of the standard, because the breach is not "a ruinous injury."
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 151 S.W.3d 803, 808
citation_a.parenthetical: noting that a writ is proper to stop the "breaching [of] a tightly guarded privilege"
citation_a.sentence: Bender, 343 S.W.2d at 801. The violation of a privilege is such a case. Id. at 802 (stating, regarding a privilege, that “in a certain class of cases, of which this is one, the showing of such grievous injury is not an absolute necessity”); see also Grange Mut. Ins. Co. v. Trude, 151 S.W.3d 803, 808 (Ky.2004) (noting that a writ is proper to stop the “breaching [of] a tightly guarded privilege”).
citation_b.signal: no signal
citation_b.identifier: 343 S.W.2d 801, 801
citation_b.parenthetical: stating, regarding a privilege, that "in a certain class of cases, of which this is one, the showing of such grievous injury is not an absolute necessity"
citation_b.sentence: Bender, 343 S.W.2d at 801. The violation of a privilege is such a case. Id. at 802 (stating, regarding a privilege, that “in a certain class of cases, of which this is one, the showing of such grievous injury is not an absolute necessity”); see also Grange Mut. Ins. Co. v. Trude, 151 S.W.3d 803, 808 (Ky.2004) (noting that a writ is proper to stop the “breaching [of] a tightly guarded privilege”).