context: Because the contested matter and the adversary proceeding were consolidated "for all purposes," the sixty-day limit governing the contested matter extends to the entire consolidated case.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 829 F.2d 1484, 1487
citation_a.parenthetical: finding that where the United States was a party to one case, the sixty-day rule applied to the other case if the cases were consolidated
citation_a.sentence: See In re Adams Apple, Inc., 829 F.2d 1484, 1487 (9th Cir.1987) (finding that where the United States was a party to one case, the sixty-day rule applied to the other case if the cases were consolidated); cf. Bay State HMO Mgmt., Inc. v. Tingley Sys., Inc., 181 F.3d 174, 182 (1st Cir.1999) (holding that consolidated cases should be treated as single action for purposes of determining res judicata).
citation_b.signal: cf.
citation_b.identifier: 181 F.3d 174, 182
citation_b.parenthetical: holding that consolidated cases should be treated as single action for purposes of determining res judicata
citation_b.sentence: See In re Adams Apple, Inc., 829 F.2d 1484, 1487 (9th Cir.1987) (finding that where the United States was a party to one case, the sixty-day rule applied to the other case if the cases were consolidated); cf. Bay State HMO Mgmt., Inc. v. Tingley Sys., Inc., 181 F.3d 174, 182 (1st Cir.1999) (holding that consolidated cases should be treated as single action for purposes of determining res judicata).