context: In Sibley, the private duty nurse was entirely dependent upon the hospital for access to her patients; without the hospital's referral, she had no relationship with any particular patient. Faced with this set of facts, the Sibley court held the interference prohibited under Title VII.
citation_a.signal: cf.
citation_a.identifier: 838 F.2d 1156, 1156
citation_a.parenthetical: applying Sibley where denial of staff privileges to a doctor by a hospital may have interfered with a written contract of employment with a professional corporation
citation_a.sentence: Cf. Pardazi, 838 F.2d at 1156 (applying Sibley where denial of staff privileges to a doctor by a hospital may have interfered with a written contract of employment with a professional corporation).
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.parenthetical: applying Sibley under the same set of facts, except that contract was between a private nurse and the doctors who employed her
citation_b.sentence: Sibley, 488 F.2d at 1342; see also Christopher, 936 F.2d at 877 n. 3 (applying Sibley under the same set of facts, except that contract was between a private nurse and the doctors who employed her).