context: Under the law, however, Colony Square had an affirmative duty to monitor Prudential's compliance with the lease.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 250 S.E.2d 155, 157
citation_a.parenthetical: "a plaintiff must exercise reasonable diligence to learn of the existence of a cause of action"
citation_a.sentence: See Limoli v. First Ga. Bank, 147 Ga.App. 755, 757, 250 S.E.2d 155, 157 (1978) (“a plaintiff must exercise reasonable diligence to learn of the existence of a cause of action”); see also Owen v. Mobley Construction Co., 171 Ga.App. 462, 320 S.E.2d 225 (1984) (Georgia’s “discovery rule” for the accrual of a tort cause of action inapplicable to a claim for breach of contract). Colony Square has presented no evidence of either its due diligence or of Prudential’s concealment.
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.parenthetical: Georgia's "discovery rule" for the accrual of a tort cause of action inapplicable to a claim for breach of contract
citation_b.sentence: See Limoli v. First Ga. Bank, 147 Ga.App. 755, 757, 250 S.E.2d 155, 157 (1978) (“a plaintiff must exercise reasonable diligence to learn of the existence of a cause of action”); see also Owen v. Mobley Construction Co., 171 Ga.App. 462, 320 S.E.2d 225 (1984) (Georgia’s “discovery rule” for the accrual of a tort cause of action inapplicable to a claim for breach of contract). Colony Square has presented no evidence of either its due diligence or of Prudential’s concealment.