context: On January 28, 2013, Shabazz filed a motion for release pending appeal and on February 20, 2013, he filed objections to the presentence report. Because only two months have passed since Shabazz filed his objections to the presentence report and three months since the filing of his motion for release pending appeal, the delay "does not yet rise to the level of a denial of due process."
citation_a.signal: no signal
citation_a.identifier: 102 F.3d 79, 79
citation_a.parenthetical: denying a mandamus petition where the district court had not ruled on petitioner's motion in four months
citation_a.sentence: Madden, 102 F.3d at 79 (denying a mandamus petition where the district court had not ruled on petitioner’s motion in four months).
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.parenthetical: five month delay between guilty plea and sentence was not "unreasonable" within the meaning of Fed.R.Crim.P. 32(a
citation_b.sentence: See also United States v. Campisi, 583 F.2d 692 (3d Cir.1978) (five month delay between guilty plea and sentence was not "unreasonable” within the meaning of Fed.R.Crim.P. 32(a)).