context: To secure a new trial, however, it is not sufficient for the moving party to show that the district court made a mistake in admitting certain testimony or by using improper jury instructions. A motion for a new trial "will not be granted unless the moving party suffered prejudice."
citation_a.signal: no signal
citation_a.identifier: 386 F.3d 729, 736
citation_a.parenthetical: applying the harmless error standard to the improper admission of evidence
citation_a.sentence: Field v. Trigg Cnty. Hosp. Inc., 386 F.3d 729, 736 (6th Cir.2004) (applying the harmless error standard to the improper admission of evidence); see Anderson v. Branen, 17 F.3d 552, 556 (2d Cir.1994) (“An erroneous [jury] instruction, unless harmless, requires a new trial.”).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 17 F.3d 552, 556
citation_b.parenthetical: "An erroneous [jury] instruction, unless harmless, requires a new trial."
citation_b.sentence: Field v. Trigg Cnty. Hosp. Inc., 386 F.3d 729, 736 (6th Cir.2004) (applying the harmless error standard to the improper admission of evidence); see Anderson v. Branen, 17 F.3d 552, 556 (2d Cir.1994) (“An erroneous [jury] instruction, unless harmless, requires a new trial.”).