context: A parent's broad general policy statements regarding employment matters are not enough to satisfy this prong. To satisfy the control prong, a parent must control the day-to-day employment decisions of the subsidiary."
citation_a.signal: no signal
citation_a.identifier: 51 F.Supp.2d 1028, 1034
citation_a.parenthetical: "although a court must consider each of the factors [in the integrated enterprise test], the critical inquiry requires an examination of which entity made the final decisions regarding employment matters."
citation_a.sentence: Inc., 3 F.3d 1357, 1363 (10th Cir.1993)); Cellini v. Harcourt Brace & Co., 51 F.Supp.2d 1028, 1034 (S.D.Cal.1999) (“although a court must consider each of the factors [in the integrated enterprise test], the critical inquiry requires an examination of which entity made the final decisions regarding employment matters.”); cf. Singh v. 7-Eleven, Inc., 2007 WL 715488 *7 (N.D.Cal.2007) (“California courts have consistently recognized that the principle test for determining employment relationships is the right of control over the manner or means of accomplishing the result desired.”).
citation_b.signal: cf.
citation_b.identifier: 2007 WL 715488, *7
citation_b.parenthetical: "California courts have consistently recognized that the principle test for determining employment relationships is the right of control over the manner or means of accomplishing the result desired."
citation_b.sentence: Inc., 3 F.3d 1357, 1363 (10th Cir.1993)); Cellini v. Harcourt Brace & Co., 51 F.Supp.2d 1028, 1034 (S.D.Cal.1999) (“although a court must consider each of the factors [in the integrated enterprise test], the critical inquiry requires an examination of which entity made the final decisions regarding employment matters.”); cf. Singh v. 7-Eleven, Inc., 2007 WL 715488 *7 (N.D.Cal.2007) (“California courts have consistently recognized that the principle test for determining employment relationships is the right of control over the manner or means of accomplishing the result desired.”).