context: Marsh chose to rely upon assistance from the prison legal access attorney and an inmate law clerk despite the fact that he was raising in the state courts only the unexhausted claims he already had raised in federal court." R. doc. 11, at 5-6. The fact that an inmate law clerk was assisting in drafting the state petition does not relieve Mr. Marsh from the personal responsibility of complying with the law.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 1 F.Supp.2d 650, 655
citation_a.parenthetical: noting that although inmate had received assistance from fellow inmate, he could have filed the petition himself at any time
citation_a.sentence: See Henderson v. John son, 1 F.Supp.2d 650, 655 (N.D.Tex.1998) (noting that although inmate had received assistance from fellow inmate, he could have filed the petition himself at any time); see also Steed, 219 F.3d 1298, 1300 (holding that attorney miscalculation of AEDPA time period did not justify equitable tolling).
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.identifier: 219 F.3d 1298, 1300
citation_b.parenthetical: holding that attorney miscalculation of AEDPA time period did not justify equitable tolling
citation_b.sentence: See Henderson v. John son, 1 F.Supp.2d 650, 655 (N.D.Tex.1998) (noting that although inmate had received assistance from fellow inmate, he could have filed the petition himself at any time); see also Steed, 219 F.3d 1298, 1300 (holding that attorney miscalculation of AEDPA time period did not justify equitable tolling).