context: "However, such language does not mean the matter is committed exclusively to agency discretion." "[L]anguage allowing for discretion does not create unlimited discretion____ Thus, courts routinely conclude that judicial review is available notwithstanding statutory language that seemingly allows for unlimited discretion."
citation_a.signal: cf.
citation_a.parenthetical: "Though the language of 32 CFR SS 1625.2 is permissive, it does not follow that a board may arbitrarily refuse to reopen a registrant's classification."
citation_a.sentence: Inova Alexandria Hosp. v. Shalala, 244 F.3d 342, 348 (4th Cir.2001) (citation omitted) (finding regulation providing that the Provider Reimbursement Review Board “may dismiss” an appeal was reviewable); cf. Mulloy v. United States, 398 U.S. 410, 415, 90 S.Ct. 1766, 26 L.Ed.2d 362 (1970) (“Though the language of 32 CFR § 1625.2 is permissive, it does not follow that a board may arbitrarily refuse to reopen a registrant’s classification.”).
citation_b.signal: no signal
citation_b.identifier: 244 F.3d 342, 348
citation_b.parenthetical: finding regulation providing that the Provider Reimbursement Review Board "may dismiss" an appeal was reviewable
citation_b.sentence: Inova Alexandria Hosp. v. Shalala, 244 F.3d 342, 348 (4th Cir.2001) (citation omitted) (finding regulation providing that the Provider Reimbursement Review Board “may dismiss” an appeal was reviewable); cf. Mulloy v. United States, 398 U.S. 410, 415, 90 S.Ct. 1766, 26 L.Ed.2d 362 (1970) (“Though the language of 32 CFR § 1625.2 is permissive, it does not follow that a board may arbitrarily refuse to reopen a registrant’s classification.”).