context: . Young's statement that Alexander "[has] a gun on him now" is not rendered inadmissible simply because it was made in response to the dispatcher's question.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 192 F.3d 767, 767
citation_a.parenthetical: fact that declarant answered dispatcher's questions, rather than giving spontaneous narrative, did not disprove excitement
citation_a.sentence: See Joy, 192 F.3d at 767 (fact that declarant answered dispatcher’s questions, rather than giving spontaneous narrative, did not disprove excitement); see also United States v. Glenn, 473 F.2d 191, 194 (D.C.Cir.1972) ("Declarations relating to the circumstances of a violent crime, made by the victim shortly after its occurrence ... may be admissible although made in response to an inquiry.").
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.identifier: 473 F.2d 191, 194
citation_b.parenthetical: "Declarations relating to the circumstances of a violent crime, made by the victim shortly after its occurrence ... may be admissible although made in response to an inquiry."
citation_b.sentence: See Joy, 192 F.3d at 767 (fact that declarant answered dispatcher’s questions, rather than giving spontaneous narrative, did not disprove excitement); see also United States v. Glenn, 473 F.2d 191, 194 (D.C.Cir.1972) ("Declarations relating to the circumstances of a violent crime, made by the victim shortly after its occurrence ... may be admissible although made in response to an inquiry.").