context: Accordingly, with regard to the AAA, courts refuse to enforce "vague" or "amorphous" provisions, or to create additional requirements not mentioned in the statute but merely "consistent with [its] purpose."
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 715 F.Supp. 1401, 1401
citation_a.parenthetical: no enforceable right to placement in the most family-like setting or reasonable efforts to help child remain in home
citation_a.sentence: Aristotle P. v. Johnson, 721 F.Supp. 1002, 1012 (N.D.Ill.1989) (no right to placement in the most family-like setting, “reasonable efforts to reunify families,” or “meaningful sibling visitation”); see also B.H., 715 F.Supp. at 1401 (no enforceable right to placement in the most family-like setting or reasonable efforts to help child remain in home); but see Artist M. v. Johnson, 726 F.Supp. 690, 695 (N.D.Ill.1989) (implied private right of action with respect to “rea sonable” preventive and reunification services; “the use of the word ‘reasonable’ in a statutory provision does not render the requirement too vague or ambiguous to be enforced”).
citation_b.signal: no signal
citation_b.identifier: 721 F.Supp. 1002, 1012
citation_b.parenthetical: no right to placement in the most family-like setting, "reasonable efforts to reunify families," or "meaningful sibling visitation"
citation_b.sentence: Aristotle P. v. Johnson, 721 F.Supp. 1002, 1012 (N.D.Ill.1989) (no right to placement in the most family-like setting, “reasonable efforts to reunify families,” or “meaningful sibling visitation”); see also B.H., 715 F.Supp. at 1401 (no enforceable right to placement in the most family-like setting or reasonable efforts to help child remain in home); but see Artist M. v. Johnson, 726 F.Supp. 690, 695 (N.D.Ill.1989) (implied private right of action with respect to “rea sonable” preventive and reunification services; “the use of the word ‘reasonable’ in a statutory provision does not render the requirement too vague or ambiguous to be enforced”).