context: Moreover, the parties agree that Stewart's medical condition was known by the prison guards. Our review of the summary judgment evidence indicates that Appellees also intentionally disregarded the established treatment plan for Stewart.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 467 F.3d 465, 465
citation_a.parenthetical: holding that summary judgment was improper on qualified immunity grounds when defendant was aware of prisoner's need for medical treatment but failed to provide it
citation_a.sentence: See Chapman v. Johnson, 339 Fed.Appx. 446, 448 (5th Cir.2009) (per curiam) (unpublished) (stating that a defendant is not entitled to summary judgment based on qualified immunity when the defendant knew of prisoner’s injury and treatment protocol but failed to follow it); see also Easter, 467 F.3d at 465 (holding that summary judgment was improper on qualified immunity grounds when defendant was aware of prisoner’s need for medical treatment but failed to provide it).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 339 Fed.Appx. 446, 448
citation_b.parenthetical: stating that a defendant is not entitled to summary judgment based on qualified immunity when the defendant knew of prisoner's injury and treatment protocol but failed to follow it
citation_b.sentence: See Chapman v. Johnson, 339 Fed.Appx. 446, 448 (5th Cir.2009) (per curiam) (unpublished) (stating that a defendant is not entitled to summary judgment based on qualified immunity when the defendant knew of prisoner’s injury and treatment protocol but failed to follow it); see also Easter, 467 F.3d at 465 (holding that summary judgment was improper on qualified immunity grounds when defendant was aware of prisoner’s need for medical treatment but failed to provide it).