context: Statements which "intimate that an investigation has focussed on a specific individual easily could induce a reasonable person to believe that failure to cooperate would only lead to formal detention." Thus, a seizure occurred when officer had defendant's ticket and "took [the defendant] aside and informed him that he was suspected of carrying narcotics."
citation_a.signal: but see
citation_a.identifier: 725 F.2d 56, 57
citation_a.parenthetical: statement that person under suspicion may not be enough to constitute seizure
citation_a.sentence: United States v. Hanson, 801 F.2d 757, 761 (5th Cir.1986); United States v. Nunley, 873 F.2d 182, 184-85 (8th Cir. 1989) (consensual airport conversation became detention when officer told traveller that officers were there to stop flow of drugs through airport); United States v. Sadosky, 732 F.2d 1388, 1392 (8th Cir.1983) cert. denied, 469 U.S. 884, 105 S.Ct. 254, 83 L.Ed.2d 191 (1984); but see United States v. Morgan, 725 F.2d 56, 57 (7th Cir.1984) (statement that person under suspicion may not be enough to constitute seizure).
citation_b.signal: no signal
citation_b.identifier: 873 F.2d 182, 184-85
citation_b.parenthetical: consensual airport conversation became detention when officer told traveller that officers were there to stop flow of drugs through airport
citation_b.sentence: United States v. Hanson, 801 F.2d 757, 761 (5th Cir.1986); United States v. Nunley, 873 F.2d 182, 184-85 (8th Cir. 1989) (consensual airport conversation became detention when officer told traveller that officers were there to stop flow of drugs through airport); United States v. Sadosky, 732 F.2d 1388, 1392 (8th Cir.1983) cert. denied, 469 U.S. 884, 105 S.Ct. 254, 83 L.Ed.2d 191 (1984); but see United States v. Morgan, 725 F.2d 56, 57 (7th Cir.1984) (statement that person under suspicion may not be enough to constitute seizure).