context: However, the jury could have fairly concluded the assault on Buford was part of a continuous chain of events that started when appellants were across the street planning to enter the presumably (at 3 a.m.) occupied house.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 699 A.2d 373, 386
citation_a.parenthetical: reasonable jury could have found that shootings [or a stabbing] were "a means of facilitating the successful completion of the armed burglary, and that the burglary and the [stabbing] were 'all part of one continuous chain of events' "
citation_a.sentence: See Lee v. United States, 699 A.2d 373, 386 (D.C.1997) (reasonable jury could have found that shootings [or a stabbing] were “a means of facilitating the successful completion of the armed burglary, and that the burglary and the [stabbing] were ‘all part of one continuous chain of events’ ”) (citation omitted); see also Price v. United States, 813 A.2d 169, 176-77 (D.C.2002) (evidence sufficient for aiding and abetting where appellant arrived with two companions, who had visible guns, and remained with them as one made threats to kill and the other shot two people).
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.identifier: 813 A.2d 169, 176-77
citation_b.parenthetical: evidence sufficient for aiding and abetting where appellant arrived with two companions, who had visible guns, and remained with them as one made threats to kill and the other shot two people
citation_b.sentence: See Lee v. United States, 699 A.2d 373, 386 (D.C.1997) (reasonable jury could have found that shootings [or a stabbing] were “a means of facilitating the successful completion of the armed burglary, and that the burglary and the [stabbing] were ‘all part of one continuous chain of events’ ”) (citation omitted); see also Price v. United States, 813 A.2d 169, 176-77 (D.C.2002) (evidence sufficient for aiding and abetting where appellant arrived with two companions, who had visible guns, and remained with them as one made threats to kill and the other shot two people).