context: Although the two paragraphs cobble together a few details, they fail to give even one date on which an alleged misrepresentation occurred. That alone dooms ABI's ability to allege fraud with particularity.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 501 F.3d 493, 504-05
citation_a.parenthetical: holding that pleading was insufficient where the plaintiff failed to, among other things, set forth the dates of any fraudulent statements
citation_a.sentence: See Heinrich, 668 F.3d at 393 (finding that a plaintiff failed to allege fraud with sufficient particularity because she “d[id] not include [in her affidavit] the date she received the allegedly fraudulent email from the defendants.”); see also United States ex rel. Bledsoe v. Cmty. Health Sys., Inc., 501 F.3d 493, 504-05 (6th Cir. 2007) (holding that pleading was insufficient where the plaintiff failed to, among other things, set forth the dates of any fraudulent statements); United States ex rel. Hirt v. Walgreen Co., 846 F.3d 879, 881 (6th Cir. 2017) (same).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 668 F.3d 393, 393
citation_b.parenthetical: finding that a plaintiff failed to allege fraud with sufficient particularity because she "d[id] not include [in her affidavit] the date she received the allegedly fraudulent email from the defendants."
citation_b.sentence: See Heinrich, 668 F.3d at 393 (finding that a plaintiff failed to allege fraud with sufficient particularity because she “d[id] not include [in her affidavit] the date she received the allegedly fraudulent email from the defendants.”); see also United States ex rel. Bledsoe v. Cmty. Health Sys., Inc., 501 F.3d 493, 504-05 (6th Cir. 2007) (holding that pleading was insufficient where the plaintiff failed to, among other things, set forth the dates of any fraudulent statements); United States ex rel. Hirt v. Walgreen Co., 846 F.3d 879, 881 (6th Cir. 2017) (same).