context: . Under the federal standards for qualified immunity, a prosecutor would be "shielded from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known."
citation_a.signal: no signal
citation_a.identifier: 457 U.S. 800, 818
citation_a.parenthetical: recognizing objective standard applicable under 42 U.S.C. SS 1983 and suits under United States Constitution
citation_a.sentence: Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800, 818, 102 S.Ct. 2727, 73 L.Ed.2d 396 (1982) (recognizing objective standard applicable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and suits under United States Constitution); see Ballantyne v. Champion Builders, Inc., 144 S.W.3d 417, 427 n. 3 (Tex.2004) (noting similarity of qualified immunity and official immunity); cf. City of Lancaster v. Chambers, 883 S.W.2d 650, 653 (Tex.1994) (Under Texas common law, official immunity provides government officials "immunity from suit arising from the performance of their (1) discretionary duties in (2) good faith as long as they are (3) acting within the scope of their authority.”).
citation_b.signal: cf.
citation_b.identifier: 883 S.W.2d 650, 653
citation_b.parenthetical: Under Texas common law, official immunity provides government officials "immunity from suit arising from the performance of their (1
citation_b.sentence: Harlow v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 800, 818, 102 S.Ct. 2727, 73 L.Ed.2d 396 (1982) (recognizing objective standard applicable under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and suits under United States Constitution); see Ballantyne v. Champion Builders, Inc., 144 S.W.3d 417, 427 n. 3 (Tex.2004) (noting similarity of qualified immunity and official immunity); cf. City of Lancaster v. Chambers, 883 S.W.2d 650, 653 (Tex.1994) (Under Texas common law, official immunity provides government officials "immunity from suit arising from the performance of their (1) discretionary duties in (2) good faith as long as they are (3) acting within the scope of their authority.”).