context: Hurn also maintains that the 1995 conviction was too remote to be relevant and that its unfair prejudice substantially outweighed its probative value. We have held that a district court does not abuse its discretion by admitting thirteen-year-old evidence of prior bad acts where the prior conduct is very similar to the conduct charged.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 406 F.3d 793, 793
citation_a.parenthetical: holding that the admission of Rule 404(b) evidence is proper in a drug case where nine years elapse between the prior conduct and the conduct charged
citation_a.sentence: See United States v. Wimberly, 60 F.3d 281, 285 (7th Cir.1995); see also Macedo, 406 F.3d at 793 (holding that the admission of Rule 404(b) evidence is proper in a drug case where nine years elapse between the prior conduct and the conduct charged).
citation_b.signal: cf.
citation_b.identifier: 291 F.3d 127, 138-39
citation_b.parenthetical: holding that a district court errs by admitting a twelve-year-old drug conviction to prove intent in a subsequent drug prosecution
citation_b.sentence: Cf. United States v. Garcia, 291 F.3d 127, 138-39 (2d Cir.2002) (holding that a district court errs by admitting a twelve-year-old drug conviction to prove intent in a subsequent drug prosecution).