context: The appellant's Article 15 punishment given on 29 March 1989 was the result of unrelated misconduct. This court has found that misconduct by an accused's absence without leave will restart the speedy trial clock, not just toll its running.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.parenthetical: appellant's period of incarceration by foreign civil authorities was not accountable to the government
citation_a.sentence: See also United States v. Smith, 5 M.J. 525 (N.C.M.R.1978), pet. denied, 5 M.J. 324 (C.M.A.1978) (appellant’s period of incarceration by foreign civil authorities was not accountable to the government).
citation_b.signal: but see
citation_b.parenthetical: unauthorized absence tolled the statute but did not reset the clock to zero
citation_b.sentence: But see United States v. Lilly, 22 M.J. 620 (N.M.C.M.R.1986) (unauthorized absence tolled the statute but did not reset the clock to zero).