context: Both the federal and Commonwealth cases involve only Commonwealth law, but this factor does not necessarily counsel in favor of dismissal. Although the presence of a federal law issue "must always be a major consideration weighing against surrender [of jurisdiction]," Moses H. See also Arkwright-Boston Mfrs.
citation_a.signal: cf.
citation_a.identifier: 733 F.2d 1047, 1051
citation_a.parenthetical: "garden variety" federal diversity case applying well-settled state law principles
citation_a.sentence: Cf. Giardina v. Fontana, 733 F.2d 1047, 1051 (2d Cir.1984) (“garden variety” federal diversity case applying well-settled state law principles).
citation_b.signal: no signal
citation_b.identifier: 762 F.2d 205, 211
citation_b.parenthetical: case raises "serious questions of state law, which include whether a party may recover in tort for a purely economic loss, absent physical injury ... and the construction of state and municipal building, safety, and fire codes"
citation_b.sentence: Mutual v. City of New York, 762 F.2d 205, 211 (2d Cir.1985) (case raises “serious questions of state law, which include whether a party may recover in tort for a purely economic loss, absent physical injury ... and the construction of state and municipal building, safety, and fire codes”).