context: T41 Furthermore, the prosecutor made the comment only at the outset of his closing argument and did not repeat it at any other point during the trial, including the rebuttal closing.
citation_a.signal: cf.
citation_a.identifier: 888 P.2d 259, 268
citation_a.parenthetical: reversal required where improper comments repeated over the course of the entire closing argument
citation_a.sentence: See Munsey, 232 P.3d at 124 (where there are no other allegations of prosecutorial misconduct during closing, it is unlikely that isolated portion of closing argument substantially influenced the verdict); cf. Harris v. People, 888 P.2d 259, 268 (Colo.1995) (reversal required where improper comments repeated over the course of the entire closing argument).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 232 P.3d 124, 124
citation_b.parenthetical: where there are no other allegations of prosecutorial misconduct during closing, it is unlikely that isolated portion of closing argument substantially influenced the verdict
citation_b.sentence: See Munsey, 232 P.3d at 124 (where there are no other allegations of prosecutorial misconduct during closing, it is unlikely that isolated portion of closing argument substantially influenced the verdict); cf. Harris v. People, 888 P.2d 259, 268 (Colo.1995) (reversal required where improper comments repeated over the course of the entire closing argument).