context: The district court properly granted summary judgment on Brown-Younger's disability discrimination claim because Brown-Younger failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether she suffers from a disability and whether she was subjected to an adverse employment action because of her alleged disability.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 508 F.3d 1212, 1219
citation_a.parenthetical: "Because [Plaintiff] failed to present any evidence in opposition to Ap-pellees' motion for summary judgment, she has failed to demonstrate that there are any genuine issues of material facts in dispute."
citation_a.sentence: See Nunes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 164 F.3d 1243, 1246 (9th Cir.1999) (discussing the elements of a prima facie case of discrimination under the ADA); see also Bias v. Moynihan, 508 F.3d 1212, 1219 (9th Cir.2007) (“Because [Plaintiff] failed to present any evidence in opposition to Ap-pellees’ motion for summary judgment, she has failed to demonstrate that there are any genuine issues of material facts in dispute.”).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 164 F.3d 1243, 1246
citation_b.parenthetical: discussing the elements of a prima facie case of discrimination under the ADA
citation_b.sentence: See Nunes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 164 F.3d 1243, 1246 (9th Cir.1999) (discussing the elements of a prima facie case of discrimination under the ADA); see also Bias v. Moynihan, 508 F.3d 1212, 1219 (9th Cir.2007) (“Because [Plaintiff] failed to present any evidence in opposition to Ap-pellees’ motion for summary judgment, she has failed to demonstrate that there are any genuine issues of material facts in dispute.”).