context: See also H.R.Rep. No. 102-367 at 4 (same). Consequently, the ATS "should remain intact."
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 2002 WL 319887, at *4
citation_a.parenthetical: finding that "the TVPA did not preempt torture and summary execution claims under the ATCA"
citation_a.sentence: See Saravia, 348 F.Supp.2d at 1145 (finding that the plaintiff could bring a claim for extrajudicial killing under both the TVPA and ATCA because "the enactment of the TVPA did not diminish the scope of the ATCA in any way”); Wiwa, 2002 WL 319887 at *4 (finding that "the TVPA did not preempt torture and summary execution claims under the ATCA”).
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.identifier: 480 U.S. 522, 524
citation_b.parenthetical: "It is well settled ... that repeals by implication are not favored."
citation_b.sentence: See also Rodriguez v. United States, 480 U.S. 522, 524, 107 S.Ct. 1391, 94 L.Ed.2d 533 (1987) ("It is well settled ... that repeals by implication are not favored.”).