context: The district court properly granted summary judgment on Weldon's excessive force claim because it would not have been clear to every reasonable officer that the conduct violated a clearly established right.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 810 F.3d 609, 614
citation_a.parenthetical: police officer entitled to qualified immunity unless the conduct at issue violated a clearly established constitutional right
citation_a.sentence: See Sjurset v. Button, 810 F.3d 609, 614 (9th Cir. 2015) (police officer entitled to qualified immunity unless the conduct at issue violated a clearly established constitutional right); see also Arpin v. Santa Clara Valley Transp. Agency, 261 F.3d 912, 922 (9th Cir. 2001) (conclusory allega tions unsupported by factual data are insufficient to defeat a summary judgment motion).
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.identifier: 261 F.3d 912, 922
citation_b.parenthetical: conclusory allega tions unsupported by factual data are insufficient to defeat a summary judgment motion
citation_b.sentence: See Sjurset v. Button, 810 F.3d 609, 614 (9th Cir. 2015) (police officer entitled to qualified immunity unless the conduct at issue violated a clearly established constitutional right); see also Arpin v. Santa Clara Valley Transp. Agency, 261 F.3d 912, 922 (9th Cir. 2001) (conclusory allega tions unsupported by factual data are insufficient to defeat a summary judgment motion).