context: Mere verbal remonstrances or disagreements with an officer, standing alone, would not generally be considered an obstruction or a hindrance to the performance of his duty to the point of rendering the speaker guilty of criminal conduct.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.parenthetical: business owner who stood in front of officers in* his own place of business and asked them to conduct investigation outside did not resist or obstruct officers
citation_a.sentence: Moccia v. State, 174 Ga.App. 764, 331 S.E.2d 99 (Ga.Ct.App.1985) (defendant who made no threat of violence or physical advance on officer did not obstruct officer); see also English v. State, 293 So.2d 105 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1974) (business owner who stood in front of officers in* his own place of business and asked them to conduct investigation outside did not resist or obstruct officers).
citation_b.signal: no signal
citation_b.parenthetical: defendant who made no threat of violence or physical advance on officer did not obstruct officer
citation_b.sentence: Moccia v. State, 174 Ga.App. 764, 331 S.E.2d 99 (Ga.Ct.App.1985) (defendant who made no threat of violence or physical advance on officer did not obstruct officer); see also English v. State, 293 So.2d 105 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1974) (business owner who stood in front of officers in* his own place of business and asked them to conduct investigation outside did not resist or obstruct officers).