context: . Nor can Congress confer the Executive's unique Article III standing to private individuals.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.parenthetical: holding that Congress cannot confer the Executive's standing to enforce public rights on private individuals through ''citizen-suit" provisions
citation_a.sentence: See Lujan, 504 U.S. at 573-74, 112 S.Ct. 2130 (holding that Congress cannot confer the Executive’s standing to enforce public rights on private individuals through ''citizen-suit” provisions); see also Vt. Agency of Nat. Res. v. U.S. ex rel. Stevens, 529 U.S. 765, 772-74, 120 S.Ct. 1858, 146 L.Ed.2d 836 (2000) (holding that private individuals can assert the federal government’s interests in a qui tam suit because they have their own pecuniary interest as partial assignees of the government's pecuniary claim).
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.identifier: 529 U.S. 765, 772-74
citation_b.parenthetical: holding that private individuals can assert the federal government's interests in a qui tam suit because they have their own pecuniary interest as partial assignees of the government's pecuniary claim
citation_b.sentence: See Lujan, 504 U.S. at 573-74, 112 S.Ct. 2130 (holding that Congress cannot confer the Executive’s standing to enforce public rights on private individuals through ''citizen-suit” provisions); see also Vt. Agency of Nat. Res. v. U.S. ex rel. Stevens, 529 U.S. 765, 772-74, 120 S.Ct. 1858, 146 L.Ed.2d 836 (2000) (holding that private individuals can assert the federal government’s interests in a qui tam suit because they have their own pecuniary interest as partial assignees of the government's pecuniary claim).