context: When a court remands under sentence six of 42 U.S.C. section 405(g), the court retains jurisdiction and thus the ability to award EAJA compensation for post-remand administrative work. By contrast, when a court remands under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. section 405(g), ordinarily the court will not retain jurisdiction to permit EAJA fees for post-remand administrative work.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.parenthetical: explaining that a sentence four remand terminates a civil action
citation_a.sentence: See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. at 299-300 & n. 4, 113 S.Ct. 2625 (explaining that a sentence four remand terminates a civil action); but see Flores v. Shalala, 49 F.3d 562, 571 (9th Cir.1995) (where district court erroneously retained jurisdiction after sentence four remand without objection, the claimant was deemed eligible for EAJA fees for post-remand administrative work).
citation_b.signal: but see
citation_b.identifier: 49 F.3d 562, 571
citation_b.parenthetical: where district court erroneously retained jurisdiction after sentence four remand without objection, the claimant was deemed eligible for EAJA fees for post-remand administrative work
citation_b.sentence: See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. at 299-300 & n. 4, 113 S.Ct. 2625 (explaining that a sentence four remand terminates a civil action); but see Flores v. Shalala, 49 F.3d 562, 571 (9th Cir.1995) (where district court erroneously retained jurisdiction after sentence four remand without objection, the claimant was deemed eligible for EAJA fees for post-remand administrative work).