context: As to purported violations of NGFA Grain Trade Rules, the arbitrators stated that they had looked beyond the rules to the express terms of the contract, which they held took precedence over NGFA rules. Thus, there was no "manifest disregard" of the NGFA Grain Trade Rules; at most, there'was an unreviewable legal error as to the applicability of those rules.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 137 F.3d 594, 594-95
citation_a.parenthetical: "Regardless of the wisdom of the panel's [legal] conclusion, it in no way demonstrates a manifest disregard for the law warranting vacation of the arbitration award in this case."
citation_a.sentence: UHC Management Co., 148 F.3d at 998 (‘“We may not set an award aside simply because we might have interpreted the agreement differently or because the arbitrators erred in interpreting the law or in determining the facts.’ ”) (quoting Kiernan, 137 F.3d at 594); see also Kieman, 137 F.3d at 594-95 (“Regardless of the wisdom of the panel’s [legal] conclusion, it in no way demonstrates a manifest disregard for the law warranting vacation of the arbitration award in this case.”).
citation_b.signal: no signal
citation_b.identifier: 148 F.3d 998, 998
citation_b.parenthetical: '"We may not set an award aside simply because we might have interpreted the agreement differently or because the arbitrators erred in interpreting the law or in determining the facts.' "
citation_b.sentence: UHC Management Co., 148 F.3d at 998 (‘“We may not set an award aside simply because we might have interpreted the agreement differently or because the arbitrators erred in interpreting the law or in determining the facts.’ ”) (quoting Kiernan, 137 F.3d at 594); see also Kieman, 137 F.3d at 594-95 (“Regardless of the wisdom of the panel’s [legal] conclusion, it in no way demonstrates a manifest disregard for the law warranting vacation of the arbitration award in this case.”).