context: . In contrast, if the worker accepts an assignment from the temporary agency, but refuses without good cause to complete that specific assignment, the worker may face disqualification under the "quit" provisions.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 349 N.W.2d 339, 341
citation_a.parenthetical: disqualifying relator for quitting when he accepted two-week assignment from temporary agency, but worked only one day and then refused to complete assignment
citation_a.sentence: See McDonnell v. Anytime Temporaries, 349 N.W.2d 339, 341 (Minn.App.1984) (disqualifying relator for quitting when he accepted two-week assignment from temporary agency, but worked only one day and then refused to complete assignment); see also Holman v. Olsten Corp., 389 N.W.2d 236, 240-41 (Minn.App.1986) (relator who accepted six-week assignment with temporary agency, then quit after two days, was not disqualified, but her benefits were suspended for period she would have held temporary assignment).
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.identifier: 389 N.W.2d 236, 240-41
citation_b.parenthetical: relator who accepted six-week assignment with temporary agency, then quit after two days, was not disqualified, but her benefits were suspended for period she would have held temporary assignment
citation_b.sentence: See McDonnell v. Anytime Temporaries, 349 N.W.2d 339, 341 (Minn.App.1984) (disqualifying relator for quitting when he accepted two-week assignment from temporary agency, but worked only one day and then refused to complete assignment); see also Holman v. Olsten Corp., 389 N.W.2d 236, 240-41 (Minn.App.1986) (relator who accepted six-week assignment with temporary agency, then quit after two days, was not disqualified, but her benefits were suspended for period she would have held temporary assignment).