context: We find that he properly included Fleming's medical limitations in the RFC finding and the hypothetical to the VE that were supported by substantial evidence in the record after discounting Fleming's credibility. Although Fleming points to a number of detailed errors, as we have held previously, we will not reverse where, as here, "the ALJ took into account those limitations for which there was record support that did not depend on [the claimant's] subjective complaints."
citation_a.signal: no signal
citation_a.identifier: 427 F.3d 1217, 1217
citation_a.parenthetical: upholding ALJ decision despite failure to perform function-by-function assessment and failure to consider drowsiness or reactions to stress
citation_a.sentence: Bayliss, 427 F.3d at 1217 (upholding ALJ decision despite failure to perform function-by-function assessment and failure to consider drowsiness or reactions to stress); see also Stubbs-Danielson v. Astrue, 539 F.3d 1169, 1174 (9th Cir.2008) (finding that the ALJ adequately captured limitations to “concentration, persistence, or pace” with a restriction to “simple tasks”).
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.identifier: 539 F.3d 1169, 1174
citation_b.parenthetical: finding that the ALJ adequately captured limitations to "concentration, persistence, or pace" with a restriction to "simple tasks"
citation_b.sentence: Bayliss, 427 F.3d at 1217 (upholding ALJ decision despite failure to perform function-by-function assessment and failure to consider drowsiness or reactions to stress); see also Stubbs-Danielson v. Astrue, 539 F.3d 1169, 1174 (9th Cir.2008) (finding that the ALJ adequately captured limitations to “concentration, persistence, or pace” with a restriction to “simple tasks”).