context: Here, it appears that the parties may have two different and competing interpretations of the relevant portions of the Agreement. Regardless, the Court need not consider this issue at this time, because the Court finds that ASI has failed to clearly demonstrate irreparable injury, and this alone precludes the issuance of a preliminary injunction.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 765 F.3d 219, 219
citation_a.parenthetical: "Absent a showing of irreparable harm, a plaintiff is not entitled to injunctive relief, even if the other three elements are found."
citation_a.sentence: See Ferring Pharm., Inc., 765 F.3d at 219 (“Absent a showing of irreparable harm, a plaintiff is not entitled to injunctive relief, even if the other three elements are found.”); see also Hoxworth v. Blinder, Robinson & Co., Inc., 903 F.2d 186, 197-98 (3d Cir. 1990) (placing particular emphasis on “likelihood of success on the merits” and “irreparable harm” as necessary “prerequisites” to obtaining a preliminary injunction).
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.identifier: 903 F.2d 186, 197-98
citation_b.parenthetical: placing particular emphasis on "likelihood of success on the merits" and "irreparable harm" as necessary "prerequisites" to obtaining a preliminary injunction
citation_b.sentence: See Ferring Pharm., Inc., 765 F.3d at 219 (“Absent a showing of irreparable harm, a plaintiff is not entitled to injunctive relief, even if the other three elements are found.”); see also Hoxworth v. Blinder, Robinson & Co., Inc., 903 F.2d 186, 197-98 (3d Cir. 1990) (placing particular emphasis on “likelihood of success on the merits” and “irreparable harm” as necessary “prerequisites” to obtaining a preliminary injunction).