context: This interpretation is also supported by reading the language of section 40-6-118(6) in tandem with the court's duties under seetion 40-6-115(3) to determine whether the PUC has regularly pursued its authority, whether the decision of the PUC is just and reasonable, and whether the PUC's conclusions are in accordance with the evidence. We have previously stated that in order to fulfill its duties, a reviewing court should have the same information available to it as the agency did in making its decision.
citation_a.signal: no signal
citation_a.identifier: 135 Colo. 146, 154
citation_a.parenthetical: noting that a court reviewing the action of an administrative agency should be placed in the same position as such agency, and therefore the agency's knowledge of a fact that is acted upon should become part of the record
citation_a.sentence: Geer v. Stathopulos, 135 Colo. 146, 154, 309 P.2d 606, 610-11 (1957) (noting that a court reviewing the action of an administrative agency should be placed in the same position as such agency, and therefore the agency's knowledge of a fact that is acted upon should become part of the record).
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.identifier: 653 F.Supp. 1229, 1236
citation_b.parenthetical: "if a court is to review an agency's action fairly, it should have before it neither more nor less information than did the agency when it made its decision"
citation_b.sentence: See also Pub. Citizen v. Heckler, 653 F.Supp. 1229, 1236 (D.D.C.1987) ("if a court is to review an agency's action fairly, it should have before it neither more nor less information than did the agency when it made its decision") (qguot-ing Walter O.