context: . Plaintiff intertwines her discussion of issue preclusion and claim preclusion. It is clear that Defendant's Motion is based upon claim preclusion.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 653 N.W.2d 345, 348
citation_a.parenthetical: "The doctrine of res judicata embraces the concepts of claim preclusion and issue preclusion."
citation_a.sentence: See Weishaar v. Snap-On Tools Corp., 582 N.W.2d 177, 180 (Iowa 1998) (explaining that claim preclusion means that "further litigation on the claim is prohibited” and issue preclusion means that “further litigation on a specific issue is barred”); see also Colvin v. Story County Bd. of Review, 653 N.W.2d 345, 348 (Iowa 2002) ("The doctrine of res judicata embraces the concepts of claim preclusion and issue preclusion.”).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 582 N.W.2d 177, 180
citation_b.parenthetical: explaining that claim preclusion means that "further litigation on the claim is prohibited" and issue preclusion means that "further litigation on a specific issue is barred"
citation_b.sentence: See Weishaar v. Snap-On Tools Corp., 582 N.W.2d 177, 180 (Iowa 1998) (explaining that claim preclusion means that "further litigation on the claim is prohibited” and issue preclusion means that “further litigation on a specific issue is barred”); see also Colvin v. Story County Bd. of Review, 653 N.W.2d 345, 348 (Iowa 2002) ("The doctrine of res judicata embraces the concepts of claim preclusion and issue preclusion.”).