context: Accordingly, for the reasons discussed, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs motion and remands Mr. Hegarty's claim to the administrator for further proceedings. See Pannebecker v. Liberty Life Assur.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 442 F.3d 648, 650
citation_a.parenthetical: approving remand where initial denial was an abuse of discretion
citation_a.sentence: Co. of Boston, 542 F.3d 1213, 1221 (9th Cir.2008) (explaining that “[wjhere an administrator’s initial denial of benefits is premised on a failure to apply plan provisions properly, we remand to the administrator to apply the terms correctly in the first instance”); see also Chronister v. Baptist Health, 442 F.3d 648, 650 (8th Cir.2006) (approving remand where initial denial was an abuse of discretion).
citation_b.signal: no signal
citation_b.identifier: 542 F.3d 1213, 1221
citation_b.parenthetical: explaining that "[wjhere an administrator's initial denial of benefits is premised on a failure to apply plan provisions properly, we remand to the administrator to apply the terms correctly in the first instance"
citation_b.sentence: Co. of Boston, 542 F.3d 1213, 1221 (9th Cir.2008) (explaining that “[wjhere an administrator’s initial denial of benefits is premised on a failure to apply plan provisions properly, we remand to the administrator to apply the terms correctly in the first instance”); see also Chronister v. Baptist Health, 442 F.3d 648, 650 (8th Cir.2006) (approving remand where initial denial was an abuse of discretion).