context: We are also concerned about the application of the permit requirement to groups of ten or more persons. We entertain doubt whether applying the permit requirement to such a small group is sufficiently tied to the City's interest in protecting the safety and convenience of citizens who use the public sidewalks and streets.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 312 U.S. 576, 576
citation_a.parenthetical: recognizing that permit requirement, applied to a "parade or procession" of five groups of fifteen to twenty persons, serves the government interest of public convenience
citation_a.sentence: See Cox, 312 U.S. at 576, 61 S.Ct. at 765-66 (recognizing that permit requirement, applied to a “parade or procession” of five groups of fifteen to twenty persons, serves the government interest of public convenience).
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.parenthetical: stating that even if 24-hour notice requirement were justified for large groups, it sweeps too broadly in regu-lating small groups.
citation_b.sentence: See also Grossman, 33 F.3d at 1207 n. 13 (comparing the Portland ordinance to the participant requirements of other cities, and concluding that the other cities’ ordinances which, in general, had participant requirements of at least 50 persons, “appear much more narrowly tailored”); Rosen v. Port of Portland, 641 F.2d 1243, 1248 n. 8 (9th Cir.1981) (stating that even if 24-hour notice requirement were justified for large groups, it sweeps too broadly in regu-lating small groups.)