context: In reviewing the district court's judgment of this issue, we must refrain from second-guessing the district court's assessment, unless we find that the court abused its discretion.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 418 F.3d 46, 46
citation_a.parenthetical: "[J]udgment calls and issues that demand the balancing of conflicting factors are reviewed deferentially."
citation_a.sentence: See George Weston Bakeries, 570 F.3d at 8 (“[W]e afford considerable deference to the trial court’s balancing of equities.”); see also Wine & Spirits Retailers, 418 F.3d at 46 (“[J]udgment calls and issues that demand the balancing of conflicting factors are reviewed deferentially.”).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 570 F.3d 8, 8
citation_b.parenthetical: "[W]e afford considerable deference to the trial court's balancing of equities."
citation_b.sentence: See George Weston Bakeries, 570 F.3d at 8 (“[W]e afford considerable deference to the trial court’s balancing of equities.”); see also Wine & Spirits Retailers, 418 F.3d at 46 (“[J]udgment calls and issues that demand the balancing of conflicting factors are reviewed deferentially.”).