context: . St. Joseph also complains that the district court erroneously submitted a question on ratification. We need not address this issue, however, as the jury's finding of liability based on joint enterprise renders the submission of ratification to show liability immaterial.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 675 S.W.2d 724, 725
citation_a.parenthetical: circumventing other issues where jury's verdict can be upheld on independent ground presented at trial
citation_a.sentence: See Ginther v. Taub, 675 S.W.2d 724, 725 (Tex.1984) (circumventing other issues where jury’s verdict can be upheld on independent ground presented at trial); see also City of Brownsville v. Alvarado, 897 S.W.2d 750, 752 (Tex.1995) (submission of improper jury question can be harmless if jury’s answers to other questions render improper question immaterial).
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.identifier: 897 S.W.2d 750, 752
citation_b.parenthetical: submission of improper jury question can be harmless if jury's answers to other questions render improper question immaterial
citation_b.sentence: See Ginther v. Taub, 675 S.W.2d 724, 725 (Tex.1984) (circumventing other issues where jury’s verdict can be upheld on independent ground presented at trial); see also City of Brownsville v. Alvarado, 897 S.W.2d 750, 752 (Tex.1995) (submission of improper jury question can be harmless if jury’s answers to other questions render improper question immaterial).