context: After considering the relevant factors for each witness, the Court finds that each of the witness's statement is independently reliable for purposes of determining probable cause. The Court further notes that any one of the three witnesses' identification of Respondent would generally be sufficient to establish probable cause.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 268 F.Supp.2d 773, 773
citation_a.parenthetical: "In the domestic law enforcement context, an ordinary citizen's eyewitness account of criminal activity and identification of a perpetrator is normally regarded as sufficient to supply probable cause."
citation_a.sentence: See Escobedo, 623 F.2d at 1102 (relying on deposition of victim identifying petitioner after being shown a single photograph of petitioner in upholding finding of probable cause); see also Cervantes Valles, 268 F.Supp.2d at 773 (“In the domestic law enforcement context, an ordinary citizen’s eyewitness account of criminal activity and identification of a perpetrator is normally regarded as sufficient to supply probable cause.”) (citing Burbridge, 252 F.3d at 778).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 623 F.2d 1102, 1102
citation_b.parenthetical: relying on deposition of victim identifying petitioner after being shown a single photograph of petitioner in upholding finding of probable cause
citation_b.sentence: See Escobedo, 623 F.2d at 1102 (relying on deposition of victim identifying petitioner after being shown a single photograph of petitioner in upholding finding of probable cause); see also Cervantes Valles, 268 F.Supp.2d at 773 (“In the domestic law enforcement context, an ordinary citizen’s eyewitness account of criminal activity and identification of a perpetrator is normally regarded as sufficient to supply probable cause.”) (citing Burbridge, 252 F.3d at 778).