context: In light of these legitimate reasons supporting the IJ's findings that Singh testimony was not wholly credible, and that he did not produce sufficient evidence to meet his burden to show past persecution, we cannot conclude that any reasonable adjudicator would find contrary to the IJ's determination concerning Singh's credibility and refugee status. On that same basis, Singh's other claims fail.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 569 F.3d 250, 256-57
citation_a.parenthetical: IJ's finding, under stricter review of REAL ID Act, that petitioner did not testify credibly "precludes her from meeting any of these burdens of proof'
citation_a.sentence: See Bah, 462 F.3d at 643 (“Because Bah cannot show that she qualifies for asylum, she cannot meet the more stringent standards required to qualify for the protections of withholding of removal or under CAT.”); see also El-Moussa v. Holder, 569 F.3d 250, 256-57 (6th Cir.2009) (IJ’s finding, under stricter review of REAL ID Act, that petitioner did not testify credibly “precludes her from meeting any of these burdens of proof’).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 462 F.3d 643, 643
citation_b.parenthetical: "Because Bah cannot show that she qualifies for asylum, she cannot meet the more stringent standards required to qualify for the protections of withholding of removal or under CAT."
citation_b.sentence: See Bah, 462 F.3d at 643 (“Because Bah cannot show that she qualifies for asylum, she cannot meet the more stringent standards required to qualify for the protections of withholding of removal or under CAT.”); see also El-Moussa v. Holder, 569 F.3d 250, 256-57 (6th Cir.2009) (IJ’s finding, under stricter review of REAL ID Act, that petitioner did not testify credibly “precludes her from meeting any of these burdens of proof’).