context: Our conclusion that courts cannot provide a remedy when the Legislature has failed to do so is also entirely consistent with the position of Florida courts in other contexts. See, e.g., Jolley v. Seamco Labs.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 633 So.2d 3, 6
citation_a.parenthetical: finding that if Legislature had intended penalty for a violation of a time limit to be dismissal of the administrative complaint, it would have expressly included that sanction within section 455.225, Florida Statutes (Supp.1986
citation_a.sentence: Inc., 828 So.2d 1050, 1051 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002) (declining to provide a remedy for a violation of Florida’s Wrongful Death Act); see also Carter v. Dep’t of Prof'l Regulation, 633 So.2d 3, 6 (Fla.1994) (finding that if Legislature had intended penalty for a violation of a time limit to be dismissal of the administrative complaint, it would have expressly included that sanction within section 455.225, Florida Statutes (Supp.1986)).
citation_b.signal: no signal
citation_b.identifier: 828 So.2d 1050, 1051
citation_b.parenthetical: declining to provide a remedy for a violation of Florida's Wrongful Death Act
citation_b.sentence: Inc., 828 So.2d 1050, 1051 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002) (declining to provide a remedy for a violation of Florida’s Wrongful Death Act); see also Carter v. Dep’t of Prof'l Regulation, 633 So.2d 3, 6 (Fla.1994) (finding that if Legislature had intended penalty for a violation of a time limit to be dismissal of the administrative complaint, it would have expressly included that sanction within section 455.225, Florida Statutes (Supp.1986)).