context: We decline to decide this case on the mere possibility that the Board can and will assume that authority and then will exercise it in defendant's case.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 301 Or 129, 133-34
citation_a.parenthetical: challenge to expired agency rule dismissed as moot even though agency could readopt the rule at " 'any time it chooses' "
citation_a.sentence: See Hay v. Dept. of Transportation, 301 Or 129, 133-34, 719 P2d 860 (1986) (challenge to expired agency rule dismissed as moot even though agency could readopt the rule at “ ‘any time it chooses’ ”).
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.identifier: 315 Or 406, 406-07
citation_b.parenthetical: challenge to PSRB order keeping petitioner confined in Oregon State Hospital moot after petitioner released from supervision even though state might later attempt to assess costs for his care during the time petitioner claimed he was wrongfully hospitalized
citation_b.sentence: See also Brumnett v. PSRB, supra, 315 Or at 406-07 (challenge to PSRB order keeping petitioner confined in Oregon State Hospital moot after petitioner released from supervision even though state might later attempt to assess costs for his care during the time petitioner claimed he was wrongfully hospitalized); State ex rel Van Hoomissen v. Burke, 236 Or 366, 368, 388 P2d 467 (1964) (mandamus proceeding that prosecutor brought to force judge to impose five-year sentence on defendant rather than two-year probation dismissed as moot after defendant violated terms of probation and judge imposed five-year sentence).