context: The court's discussion, quoted above, reveals that the court concluded that Mother failed to provide the Children with a safe environment, and that the termination of Mother's parental rights is in the Children's best interests.
citation_a.signal: no signal
citation_a.identifier: 71 A.3d 251, 268
citation_a.parenthetical: stating that the strong parent-child bond was an unhealthy one that could not by itself serve as grounds to prolong foster care drift
citation_a.sentence: Id. at 6. The court found that although the Children have a bond with Mother, the bond is not necessarily meaningful or healthy. Id. at 7. See In re T.S.M., 620 Pa. 602, 71 A.3d 251, 268 (2018) (stating that the strong parent-child bond was an unhealthy one that could not by itself serve as grounds to prolong foster care drift); see also In re L.M., 923 A.2d 505, 512 (Pa.Super.2007) (holding that a parent’s love of her child, alone, does not preclude a termination). The court also noted that the Children are no longer in harnfs way, which is allowing them “to grow and develop.”
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.identifier: 923 A.2d 505, 512
citation_b.parenthetical: holding that a parent's love of her child, alone, does not preclude a termination
citation_b.sentence: Id. at 6. The court found that although the Children have a bond with Mother, the bond is not necessarily meaningful or healthy. Id. at 7. See In re T.S.M., 620 Pa. 602, 71 A.3d 251, 268 (2018) (stating that the strong parent-child bond was an unhealthy one that could not by itself serve as grounds to prolong foster care drift); see also In re L.M., 923 A.2d 505, 512 (Pa.Super.2007) (holding that a parent’s love of her child, alone, does not preclude a termination). The court also noted that the Children are no longer in harnfs way, which is allowing them “to grow and develop.”