context: This court has previously reconsidered its decisions when presented with compelling new evidence.
citation_a.signal: but see
citation_a.identifier: 877 F.2d 174, 179
citation_a.parenthetical: declining to reconsider a previous Miranda holding based on new evidence concerning officer motivation in questioning suspect
citation_a.sentence: See Cirami, 563 F.2d at 33-35 (new “extraordinary” evidence of attorney negligence supported reconsideration); Fernandez, 506 F.2d at 1204 (reconsidered holding because new evidence conclusively contradicted government’s previous representation); but see United States v. Adegbite, 877 F.2d 174, 179 (2d Cir.1989) (declining to reconsider a previous Miranda holding based on new evidence concerning officer motivation in questioning suspect).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 506 F.2d 1204, 1204
citation_b.parenthetical: reconsidered holding because new evidence conclusively contradicted government's previous representation
citation_b.sentence: See Cirami, 563 F.2d at 33-35 (new “extraordinary” evidence of attorney negligence supported reconsideration); Fernandez, 506 F.2d at 1204 (reconsidered holding because new evidence conclusively contradicted government’s previous representation); but see United States v. Adegbite, 877 F.2d 174, 179 (2d Cir.1989) (declining to reconsider a previous Miranda holding based on new evidence concerning officer motivation in questioning suspect).