context: . While the majority contends that its decision today affects only Swanner's conduct, not his religious beliefs, Opinion at 283, I do not believe that the Alaska Constitution distinguishes so clearly between religious belief and religious conduct.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 604 P.2d 1070, 1070
citation_a.parenthetical: because of the close relationship between conduct and belief, and because of the high value we assign to religious beliefs, religiously impelled actions can be forbidden only where they are outweighed by a compelling governmental interest
citation_a.sentence: See Frank, 604 P.2d at 1070 (because of the close relationship between conduct and belief, and because of the high value we assign to religious beliefs, religiously impelled actions can be forbidden only where they are outweighed by a compelling governmental interest).
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.identifier: 92 S.Ct. 1526, 1535-36
citation_b.parenthetical: "[Bjelief and action cannot be neatly confined in logic-tight compartments."
citation_b.sentence: See also Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205, 220, 92 S.Ct. 1526, 1535-36, 32 L.Ed.2d 15 (1972) ("[Bjelief and action cannot be neatly confined in logic-tight compartments.”); Smith, 494 U.S. at 893, 110 S.Ct. at 1608 (O’Connor, J., concurring) (“Because the First Amendment does not distinguish between religious belief and religious conduct, conduct motivated by sincere religious belief, like the belief itself, must therefore be at least presumptively protected by the Free Exercise Clause.”).