context: The district court properly dismissed Bonilla's claims against defendants in their individual capacities because Bonilla did not exhaust prison grievance procedures concerning those claims.
citation_a.signal: cf.
citation_a.identifier: 591 F.3d 1217, 1224-26
citation_a.parenthetical: excusing prisoner's failure to exhaust where prisoner is prevented from doing so
citation_a.sentence: See Woodford v. Ngo, 548 U.S. 81, 93-95, 126 S.Ct. 2378, 165 L.Ed.2d 368 (2006) (exhaustion is mandatory and must be done in a timely manner consistent with prison policies); cf. Nunez v. Duncan, 591 F.3d 1217, 1224-26 (9th Cir.2010) (excusing prisoner’s failure to exhaust where prisoner is prevented from doing so).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 548 U.S. 81, 93-95
citation_b.parenthetical: exhaustion is mandatory and must be done in a timely manner consistent with prison policies
citation_b.sentence: See Woodford v. Ngo, 548 U.S. 81, 93-95, 126 S.Ct. 2378, 165 L.Ed.2d 368 (2006) (exhaustion is mandatory and must be done in a timely manner consistent with prison policies); cf. Nunez v. Duncan, 591 F.3d 1217, 1224-26 (9th Cir.2010) (excusing prisoner’s failure to exhaust where prisoner is prevented from doing so).