context: And even though Chapman and A.E.W. each "chipped in" $20, Chapman made the money exchange for the heroin. Further, Chapman took possession of the entire purchase and "cooked" the heroin, playing an active role in the transaction.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 2007 WL 1412880, at *1
citation_a.parenthetical: stating that drug user's action of cooking heroin was a direct cause of another drug user's death
citation_a.sentence: See Meyer, 646 N.W.2d at 904 (concluding that, for purposes of section 609.195(b), “selling” includes manufacturing a controlled substance); see also State v. Rodriguez, No. A06-711, 2007 WL 1412880, at *1 (Minn. App. May 15, 2007) (stating that drug user’s action of cooking heroin was a direct cause of another drug user’s death), review denied (Minn. Aug. 7, 2007). Finally, Chapman prepared a needle to take home to his girlfriend, acting as a go-between for another addict.
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 646 N.W.2d 904, 904
citation_b.parenthetical: concluding that, for purposes of section 609.195(b), "selling" includes manufacturing a controlled substance
citation_b.sentence: See Meyer, 646 N.W.2d at 904 (concluding that, for purposes of section 609.195(b), “selling” includes manufacturing a controlled substance); see also State v. Rodriguez, No. A06-711, 2007 WL 1412880, at *1 (Minn. App. May 15, 2007) (stating that drug user’s action of cooking heroin was a direct cause of another drug user’s death), review denied (Minn. Aug. 7, 2007). Finally, Chapman prepared a needle to take home to his girlfriend, acting as a go-between for another addict.