context: Related cases have also generated two appeals to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit. One appeal dealt with the question of whether or not the identities of various confidential informants should be disclosed to Plaintiffs for use in this and related civil litigation.
citation_a.signal: no signal
citation_a.parenthetical: affirming Judge Ur-bom's refusal to require the government to disclose the names of confidential informants and to produce unredacted search warrant affidavit for civil-litigation purposes
citation_a.sentence: United States v. Jones Oil Co., 60 F.3d 831, 1995 WL 408251 (8th Cir.1995) (affirming Judge Ur-bom’s refusal to require the government to disclose the names of confidential informants and to produce unredacted search warrant affidavit for civil-litigation purposes).
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.identifier: 869 F.Supp. 749, 749-50
citation_b.parenthetical: adopting Judge Urbom's decision and holding that the government should not be compelled to disclose identities of confidential informants described but not named in search warrant affidavit
citation_b.sentence: See also Jones I, 869 F.Supp. at 749-50 (adopting Judge Urbom’s decision and holding that the government should not be compelled to disclose identities of confidential informants described but not named in search warrant affidavit).