context: The District Court's categorical denial of tolling is also incompatible with Delaware's apparent intent to encourage SS 220 actions as a way to allow stockholders to resolve disputes with the aid of a streamlined books and records proceeding. See Cal. State Teachers' Ret. Sys. v. Alvarez, CIV.
citation_a.signal: no signal
citation_a.identifier: 2017 WL 239364, at *3
citation_a.parenthetical: noting that "Section 220 proceedings are supposed to be streamlined and summary"
citation_a.sentence: A. No. 7455, 2017 WL 239364, at *3 (Del. Jan. 18, 2017) (noting that “Section 220 proceedings are supposed to be streamlined and summary”); see also King v. VeriFone Holdings, Inc., 12 A.3d 1140, 1145 (Del. 2011) (noting that “Delaware courts have strongly encouraged stockholder-plaintiffs to utilize Section 220”).
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.identifier: 12 A.3d 1140, 1145
citation_b.parenthetical: noting that "Delaware courts have strongly encouraged stockholder-plaintiffs to utilize Section 220"
citation_b.sentence: A. No. 7455, 2017 WL 239364, at *3 (Del. Jan. 18, 2017) (noting that “Section 220 proceedings are supposed to be streamlined and summary”); see also King v. VeriFone Holdings, Inc., 12 A.3d 1140, 1145 (Del. 2011) (noting that “Delaware courts have strongly encouraged stockholder-plaintiffs to utilize Section 220”).