context: Most of these courts, however, also take the view that there are limits on a plan proponent's classification freedom.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 800 F.2d 586, 586
citation_a.parenthetical: Bankruptcy courts have "broad discretion to determine proper classification according to the factual circumstances of each individual case."
citation_a.sentence: See U.S. Truck, 800 F.2d at 586 (Bankruptcy courts have “broad discretion to determine proper classification according to the factual circumstances of each individual case.”); see also Chateaugay, 89 F.3d at 949 (“[T]o warrant having separate classification of similar claims, the debtor must advance a legitimate reason supported by credible proof.”); see also In re Stratford Assocs.
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.identifier: 89 F.3d 949, 949
citation_b.parenthetical: "[T]o warrant having separate classification of similar claims, the debtor must advance a legitimate reason supported by credible proof."
citation_b.sentence: See U.S. Truck, 800 F.2d at 586 (Bankruptcy courts have “broad discretion to determine proper classification according to the factual circumstances of each individual case.”); see also Chateaugay, 89 F.3d at 949 (“[T]o warrant having separate classification of similar claims, the debtor must advance a legitimate reason supported by credible proof.”); see also In re Stratford Assocs.