context: That is not to say that non-discriminatory laws insulating a group of primarily local companies from competition do not have a negative impact on interstate commerce. Such laws, though, are best reviewed under the undue burden test, and are not subject to strict scrutiny.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 477 F.3d 49, 49-50
citation_a.parenthetical: a local law that does not give an advantage to local companies over out-of-state competitors is reviewed under the undue burden test
citation_a.sentence: See also Town of Southold, 477 F.3d at 49-50 (a local law that does not give an advantage to local companies over out-of-state competitors is reviewed under the undue burden test).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 127 S.Ct. 1797, 1797
citation_b.parenthetical: nondiscriminatory local laws "which treat instate private business interests exactly the same as out-of-state ones, do not 'discriminate against interstate commerce' " and are subject to the undue burden test
citation_b.sentence: See United Haulers, 127 S.Ct. at 1797 (nondiscriminatory local laws “which treat instate private business interests exactly the same as out-of-state ones, do not ‘discriminate against interstate commerce’ ” and are subject to the undue burden test).