context: While Jiang argues that the evidence he submitted demonstrates that he will be subject to China's family planning policy for having two children, the BIA reasonably gave little or no evidentiary weight to Jiang's documents in light of the adverse credibility determination that was made in his underlying proceedings.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 500 F.3d 143, 146-48
citation_a.parenthetical: holding that the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying a motion to reopen supported by allegedly unavailable evidence regarding changed country conditions where there had been a previous adverse credibility finding in the underlying asylum hearing
citation_a.sentence: See Qin Wen Zheng v. Gonzales, 500 F.3d 143, 146-48 (2d Cir.2007) (holding that the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying a motion to reopen supported by allegedly unavailable evidence regarding changed country conditions where there had been a previous adverse credibility finding in the underlying asylum hearing); see also Xiao Ji Chen v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, 471 F.3d 315, 342 (2d Cir.2006) (finding that the weight afforded to the applicant’s evidence in immigration proceedings lies largely within the discretion of the agency).
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.identifier: 471 F.3d 315, 342
citation_b.parenthetical: finding that the weight afforded to the applicant's evidence in immigration proceedings lies largely within the discretion of the agency
citation_b.sentence: See Qin Wen Zheng v. Gonzales, 500 F.3d 143, 146-48 (2d Cir.2007) (holding that the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying a motion to reopen supported by allegedly unavailable evidence regarding changed country conditions where there had been a previous adverse credibility finding in the underlying asylum hearing); see also Xiao Ji Chen v. U.S. Dep’t of Justice, 471 F.3d 315, 342 (2d Cir.2006) (finding that the weight afforded to the applicant’s evidence in immigration proceedings lies largely within the discretion of the agency).