context: . Other courts have recognized the existence of a determinable easement, or an easement subject to a condition subsequent. Although this Court has never recognized a defeasible easement, we have held an easement no longer used for its stated purposes has been abandoned and therefore extinguished.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.parenthetical: where railroad ceased to use its right-of-way for railroad purposes, it abandons right-of-way
citation_a.sentence: See also Saluda Motor Lines v. Crouch, 300 S.C. 43, 386 S.E.2d 290 (Ct.App.1989)(where railroad ceased to use its right-of-way for railroad purposes, it abandons right-of-way).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.parenthetical: owner of easement may relinquish that easement by express or implied abandonment
citation_b.sentence: See Immanuel Baptist Church v. Barnes, 274 S.C. 125, 264 S.E.2d 142 (1980) (owner of easement may relinquish that easement by express or implied abandonment).