context: Almond argued that the deposition pertained to a question central to the validity of the suit, namely whether Bayview Loan was the owner of the note and mortgage on the date it filed suit. See Country Place Cmty. Ass'n, Inc. v. J.P. Morgan Mortg.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 913 So.2d 1281, 1285
citation_a.parenthetical: stating that party's standing is determined at time suit is filed and cannot be acquired after the fact
citation_a.sentence: Acquisition Corp., 51 So.3d 1176, 1179 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) (noting that party lacks standing to file foreclosure action if it does not own or possess note and mortgage when it files suit); see also Progressive Express Ins. Co. v. McGrath Cmty. Chiropractic, 913 So.2d 1281, 1285 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) (stating that party’s standing is determined at time suit is filed and cannot be acquired after the fact).
citation_b.signal: no signal
citation_b.identifier: 51 So.3d 1176, 1179
citation_b.parenthetical: noting that party lacks standing to file foreclosure action if it does not own or possess note and mortgage when it files suit
citation_b.sentence: Acquisition Corp., 51 So.3d 1176, 1179 (Fla. 2d DCA 2010) (noting that party lacks standing to file foreclosure action if it does not own or possess note and mortgage when it files suit); see also Progressive Express Ins. Co. v. McGrath Cmty. Chiropractic, 913 So.2d 1281, 1285 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) (stating that party’s standing is determined at time suit is filed and cannot be acquired after the fact).