context: Nevertheless, to file a brief after indicating that he would do Moreover, he failed to respond to the Government' dismiss his appeal for such failure. Under these circumstances, the BIA's dismissal of Zhao's appeal was proper.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 317 F.3d 515, 515-16
citation_a.parenthetical: finding summary dismissal was proper where appellant failed to file a brief after indicating that he would do so, or to explain the reasons for such failure
citation_a.sentence: See Rioja, 317 F.3d at 515-16 (finding summary dismissal was proper where appellant failed to file a brief after indicating that he would do so, or to explain the reasons for such failure); Kokar v. Gonzales, 478 F.3d 803, 811-13 (7th Cir.2007) (same); see also Singh, 416 F.3d at 1014 (finding that an appellant’s failure to file a brief cannot be attributed to a deficiency in the BIA’s notice procedures when counsel’s actions clearly show that the failure was due to his oversight and error); Toquero v. I.N.S., 956 F.2d 193, 196-97 (9th Cir.1992) (finding that the BIA’s dismissal of petitioner’s appeal was justified when counsel was on notice that the failure to file a brief could result in summary dismissal but failed to file a brief or explain such failure).
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.identifier: 416 F.3d 1014, 1014
citation_b.parenthetical: finding that an appellant's failure to file a brief cannot be attributed to a deficiency in the BIA's notice procedures when counsel's actions clearly show that the failure was due to his oversight and error
citation_b.sentence: See Rioja, 317 F.3d at 515-16 (finding summary dismissal was proper where appellant failed to file a brief after indicating that he would do so, or to explain the reasons for such failure); Kokar v. Gonzales, 478 F.3d 803, 811-13 (7th Cir.2007) (same); see also Singh, 416 F.3d at 1014 (finding that an appellant’s failure to file a brief cannot be attributed to a deficiency in the BIA’s notice procedures when counsel’s actions clearly show that the failure was due to his oversight and error); Toquero v. I.N.S., 956 F.2d 193, 196-97 (9th Cir.1992) (finding that the BIA’s dismissal of petitioner’s appeal was justified when counsel was on notice that the failure to file a brief could result in summary dismissal but failed to file a brief or explain such failure).