context: However, Plaintiff alleges that the eavesdropping violation occurred "[i]n between the demonstrations" and while Plaintiff and his colleagues were "video reeoi'd[ing] the Circus' treatment of animals over the [loading dock] wall" near the back of the San Jose arena. There is no allegation that Plaintiff, by "lean[ing] in close to the ear of Mark Ennis" after having "looked around to visually ensure no one" else was listening, id. P 48, was addressing anyone other than Ennis, let alone members of the public at a public meeting, rally, or assembly of some sort.
citation_a.signal: cf.
citation_a.parenthetical: characterizing "a large, public celebration held outdoors in a public park, featuring, in the course of a political campaign, a public official as the principal speaker" as a "public meeting" or "public gathering"
citation_a.sentence: See ACLU of Ill. v. Alvarez, 679 F.3d 583, 609 (7th Cir.2012) (Posner, J., dissenting) (explaining that the term “public gathering,” as used in section 632(c), “connotes a public meeting of some sort”); cf. In re Kay, 1 Cal.3d 930, 83 Cal.Rptr. 686, 464 P.2d 142, 151, 153 (1970) (characterizing “a large, public celebration held outdoors in a public park, featuring, in the course of a political campaign, a public official as the principal speaker” as a “public meeting” or “public gathering”).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 679 F.3d 583, 609
citation_b.parenthetical: explaining that the term "public gathering," as used in section 632(c
citation_b.sentence: See ACLU of Ill. v. Alvarez, 679 F.3d 583, 609 (7th Cir.2012) (Posner, J., dissenting) (explaining that the term “public gathering,” as used in section 632(c), “connotes a public meeting of some sort”); cf. In re Kay, 1 Cal.3d 930, 83 Cal.Rptr. 686, 464 P.2d 142, 151, 153 (1970) (characterizing “a large, public celebration held outdoors in a public park, featuring, in the course of a political campaign, a public official as the principal speaker” as a “public meeting” or “public gathering”).