context: Thus, in contrast to Judge Coffey's representations, the Trust was funded with a significant portion of the Coffeys' assets, real and personal. Accordingly, we concur with the JCC's implicit finding that Judge Coffey was less than forthright, see AJS STUDY, supra at 82 (explaining how consideration should be given to whether a judge has offered an unlikely defense), and find that she made evasive and misleading statements to the JCC.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 141 N.H. 7, 7
citation_a.parenthetical: "We cannot give the respondent credit for cooperating with the disciplinary process when he misle[d] the referee about the extent of his misconduct."
citation_a.sentence: See Fitzpatrick’s Case, 132 N.H. 211, 218 (1989) (finding that an attorney who attempts to mislead the PCC cannot be found to have fully cooperated); see also Basbanes’ Case, 141 N.H. at 7 (“We cannot give the respondent credit for cooperating with the disciplinary process when he misle[d] the referee about the extent of his misconduct.”).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 132 N.H. 211, 218
citation_b.parenthetical: finding that an attorney who attempts to mislead the PCC cannot be found to have fully cooperated
citation_b.sentence: See Fitzpatrick’s Case, 132 N.H. 211, 218 (1989) (finding that an attorney who attempts to mislead the PCC cannot be found to have fully cooperated); see also Basbanes’ Case, 141 N.H. at 7 (“We cannot give the respondent credit for cooperating with the disciplinary process when he misle[d] the referee about the extent of his misconduct.”).