context: First, the notice requirement is only three days. Second, a university is less able than a city or other entity with police powers to deal with a significant disruption on short notice.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 762 F.2d 1197, 1203
citation_a.parenthetical: "[a] college has a right to preserve the campus for its intended purpose and to protect college students from the pressures of solicitation"
citation_a.sentence: Mote, 321 F.Supp.2d at 681 (“a University’s resources are limited and the University has an interest in reserving those resources for University community members”); see also Glover v. Cole, 762 F.2d 1197, 1203 (4th Cir.1985) (“[a] college has a right to preserve the campus for its intended purpose and to protect college students from the pressures of solicitation”). In light of the modest nature of the requirement and what the district court described as the University’s reduced capacity to address “the exigencies of determining what, if any, security, crowd control, additional insurance, etc., will be required for a particular event,” we conclude that the advance notice requirement is sufficiently narrowly tailored, and thus permissible.
citation_b.signal: no signal
citation_b.identifier: 321 F.Supp.2d 681, 681
citation_b.parenthetical: "a University's resources are limited and the University has an interest in reserving those resources for University community members"
citation_b.sentence: Mote, 321 F.Supp.2d at 681 (“a University’s resources are limited and the University has an interest in reserving those resources for University community members”); see also Glover v. Cole, 762 F.2d 1197, 1203 (4th Cir.1985) (“[a] college has a right to preserve the campus for its intended purpose and to protect college students from the pressures of solicitation”). In light of the modest nature of the requirement and what the district court described as the University’s reduced capacity to address “the exigencies of determining what, if any, security, crowd control, additional insurance, etc., will be required for a particular event,” we conclude that the advance notice requirement is sufficiently narrowly tailored, and thus permissible.