context: BJVSD has made no showing that it had an individual legal right relative to the underlying judgment and the complained-of post-judgment orders.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 533 S.W.2d 923, 927
citation_a.parenthetical: "Without breach of a legal right belonging to the plaintiff no cause of action can accrue to his benefit."
citation_a.sentence: See Nauslar, 170 S.W.3d at 249 (holding that only one whose primary legal right has been breached may seek redress for injury); see also Nobles v. Marcus, 533 S.W.2d 923, 927 (Tex.1976) (“Without breach of a legal right belonging to the plaintiff no cause of action can accrue to his benefit.”).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 170 S.W.3d 249, 249
citation_b.parenthetical: holding that only one whose primary legal right has been breached may seek redress for injury
citation_b.sentence: See Nauslar, 170 S.W.3d at 249 (holding that only one whose primary legal right has been breached may seek redress for injury); see also Nobles v. Marcus, 533 S.W.2d 923, 927 (Tex.1976) (“Without breach of a legal right belonging to the plaintiff no cause of action can accrue to his benefit.”).