context: J.A. 41-42. Given the facts of this case, we cannot conclude that the district court clearly erred when reaching this conclusion.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 77 F.3d 74, 74
citation_a.parenthetical: "The district court's decision whether to grant a two-level reduction for acceptance of responsibility is a factual determination that we review for clear error."
citation_a.sentence: See Miller, 77 F.3d at 74 (“The district court’s decision whether to grant a two-level reduction for acceptance of responsibility is a factual determination that we review for clear error.”); see also United States v. Hawley, 93 F.3d 682, 689-90 (10th Cir.1996) (affirming denial of acceptance of responsibility to defendant who received an obstruction of justice enhancement for pre-guiltyplea violation of appearance bond: “Conduct amounting to escape or violation of an appearance bond is certainly evidence of failure to accept responsibility, and this fact alone provides adequate foundation for the district court’s decision.”).
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.identifier: 93 F.3d 682, 689-90
citation_b.parenthetical: affirming denial of acceptance of responsibility to defendant who received an obstruction of justice enhancement for pre-guiltyplea violation of appearance bond: "Conduct amounting to escape or violation of an appearance bond is certainly evidence of failure to accept responsibility, and this fact alone provides adequate foundation for the district court's decision."
citation_b.sentence: See Miller, 77 F.3d at 74 (“The district court’s decision whether to grant a two-level reduction for acceptance of responsibility is a factual determination that we review for clear error.”); see also United States v. Hawley, 93 F.3d 682, 689-90 (10th Cir.1996) (affirming denial of acceptance of responsibility to defendant who received an obstruction of justice enhancement for pre-guiltyplea violation of appearance bond: “Conduct amounting to escape or violation of an appearance bond is certainly evidence of failure to accept responsibility, and this fact alone provides adequate foundation for the district court’s decision.”).