context: The trial court, however, did not consider whether Nikzad's disclaimer of ownership itself may have been tainted by his ineffective consent to the police interview.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 544 F.2d 407, 410
citation_a.parenthetical: if defendant's arrest were illegal, his subsequent denial of ownership of luggage would have been inadmissible
citation_a.sentence: See United States v. Jackson, 544 F.2d 407, 410 (9th Cir.1976) (if defendant’s arrest were illegal, his subsequent denial of ownership of luggage would have been inadmissible).
citation_b.signal: cf.
citation_b.parenthetical: finding that defendant's disclaimer was not caused by illegal police action
citation_b.sentence: Cf. United States v. Canady, 615 F.2d at 697 n. 3 (finding that defendant’s disclaimer was not caused by illegal police action); United States v. Anderson, 500 F.2d 1311, 1318 (5th Cir.1974) (same).