context: Weber's substitute might also receive less rest and time off between runs than he or she might otherwise. The mere possibility of an adverse impact on co-workers as a result of "skipping over" is sufficient to constitute an undue hardship.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.parenthetical: finding that an employer is not required to rearrange its neutral scheduling practices to accommodate an employee
citation_a.sentence: See Hardison, 432 U.S. at 81, 97 S.Ct. 2264 (the Supreme Court frowned upon a proposed accommodation that affected the possible job preferences of other employees); See also Brener, 671 F.2d 141 (5th Cir.1982), and Eversley, 843 F.2d 172 (5th Cir.1988) (finding that an employer is not required to rearrange its neutral scheduling practices to accommodate an employee).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 432 U.S. 81, 81
citation_b.parenthetical: the Supreme Court frowned upon a proposed accommodation that affected the possible job preferences of other employees
citation_b.sentence: See Hardison, 432 U.S. at 81, 97 S.Ct. 2264 (the Supreme Court frowned upon a proposed accommodation that affected the possible job preferences of other employees); See also Brener, 671 F.2d 141 (5th Cir.1982), and Eversley, 843 F.2d 172 (5th Cir.1988) (finding that an employer is not required to rearrange its neutral scheduling practices to accommodate an employee).