context: See Second Amended Complaint, P51. With respect to the second element, the Union has alleged that Fucci exercised such control to wrongfully avoid obligations rendered under the arbitration awards and that he did so by dissolving one of the Apollo entities shortly after the final award was issued.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 733 F.Supp. 762, 762
citation_a.parenthetical: piercing corporate veil to hold individual hable for award confirmed against corporation under the LMRA
citation_a.sentence: See Directors Guild, 733 F.Supp. at 762 (piercing corporate veil to hold individual hable for award confirmed against corporation under the LMRA); see also Michigan Laborers’ Health Care Fund v. Taddie Const., Inc., 119 F.Supp.2d 698, 703 (E.D.Mich.2000) (use of “the corporate form ... to improperly fail to pay fringe benefits” satisfies the element of “wrong”) (interpreting Michigan law).
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.identifier: 119 F.Supp.2d 698, 703
citation_b.parenthetical: use of "the corporate form ... to improperly fail to pay fringe benefits" satisfies the element of "wrong"
citation_b.sentence: See Directors Guild, 733 F.Supp. at 762 (piercing corporate veil to hold individual hable for award confirmed against corporation under the LMRA); see also Michigan Laborers’ Health Care Fund v. Taddie Const., Inc., 119 F.Supp.2d 698, 703 (E.D.Mich.2000) (use of “the corporate form ... to improperly fail to pay fringe benefits” satisfies the element of “wrong”) (interpreting Michigan law).