context: Such language is inflammatory, particularly to the extent that it attributes improper motives to Appellants. Thus, we admonish counsel to refrain from needlessly inflaming the passions of the jury.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 841 A.2d 1007, 1007
citation_a.parenthetical: "Strict liability focuses solely on the product ... and is divorced from the conduct of the manufacturer."
citation_a.sentence: See Young, 761 A.2d at 563 (noting that “an appeal to passion or prejudice is improper and will not be countenanced” and equating a verdict obtained by such arguments to “one obtained by false testimony”); see also Schmidt, 11 A.3d at 939 (recognizing a “central premise that negligence concepts have no place in Pennsylvania’s strict liability law”); Phillips, 841 A.2d at 1007 (“Strict liability focuses solely on the product ... and is divorced from the conduct of the manufacturer.”).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 761 A.2d 563, 563
citation_b.parenthetical: noting that "an appeal to passion or prejudice is improper and will not be countenanced" and equating a verdict obtained by such arguments to "one obtained by false testimony"
citation_b.sentence: See Young, 761 A.2d at 563 (noting that “an appeal to passion or prejudice is improper and will not be countenanced” and equating a verdict obtained by such arguments to “one obtained by false testimony”); see also Schmidt, 11 A.3d at 939 (recognizing a “central premise that negligence concepts have no place in Pennsylvania’s strict liability law”); Phillips, 841 A.2d at 1007 (“Strict liability focuses solely on the product ... and is divorced from the conduct of the manufacturer.”).