context: The district court properly granted summary judgment because Wilson failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether defendant's use of less-lethal force to disarm Wilson and effectuate his arrest violated Wilson's Fourth Amendment rights.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 673 F.3d 871, 871-72
citation_a.parenthetical: explaining circumstances under which a bean bag gun, which is a " 'less-lethal' weapon," is permissible
citation_a.sentence: See Lal v. California, 746 F.3d 1112, 1115, 1117 (9th Cir. 2014) (setting forth framework for analyzing an excessive force claim under the Fourth Amendment); see also Glenn, 673 F.3d at 871-72 (explaining circumstances under which a bean bag gun, which is a “ ‘less-lethal’ weapon,” is permissible).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 746 F.3d 1112, 1115, 1117
citation_b.parenthetical: setting forth framework for analyzing an excessive force claim under the Fourth Amendment
citation_b.sentence: See Lal v. California, 746 F.3d 1112, 1115, 1117 (9th Cir. 2014) (setting forth framework for analyzing an excessive force claim under the Fourth Amendment); see also Glenn, 673 F.3d at 871-72 (explaining circumstances under which a bean bag gun, which is a “ ‘less-lethal’ weapon,” is permissible).