context: The Supreme Court has found that some "statutes and regulations ... clearly establish fiduciary obligations of the Government."
citation_a.signal: no signal
citation_a.parenthetical: finding specific fiduciary duties of timber management in light of a statutory and regulatory'scheme creating obligations on "virtually every aspect of forest management"
citation_a.sentence: Mitchell, 463 U.S. at 226, 103 S.Ct. 2961; id. at 220, 103 S.Ct. 2961 (finding specific fiduciary duties of timber management in light of a statutory and regulatory'scheme creating obligations on “virtually every aspect of forest management”); see also White Mountain Apache Tribe, 537 U.S. at 475, 123 S.Ct. 1126 (finding specific fiduciary duties to maintain and preserve property that is “actually administered]” in trust). But where the relevant statute cannot be fairly read as imposing the specific fiduciary duty alleged to be breached, the Court has refused to impose the obligation on the government.
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.identifier: 537 U.S. 475, 475
citation_b.parenthetical: finding specific fiduciary duties to maintain and preserve property that is "actually administered]" in trust
citation_b.sentence: Mitchell, 463 U.S. at 226, 103 S.Ct. 2961; id. at 220, 103 S.Ct. 2961 (finding specific fiduciary duties of timber management in light of a statutory and regulatory'scheme creating obligations on “virtually every aspect of forest management”); see also White Mountain Apache Tribe, 537 U.S. at 475, 123 S.Ct. 1126 (finding specific fiduciary duties to maintain and preserve property that is “actually administered]” in trust). But where the relevant statute cannot be fairly read as imposing the specific fiduciary duty alleged to be breached, the Court has refused to impose the obligation on the government.