context: Moreover, the January/February, 2000 Confession Date first was articulated here by the Plaintiffs own witness, Denise. Accordingly, this court is not persuaded that the Debtor is playing "fast and loose" with the courts by using the January/February, 2000 Confession Date here.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 563 F.Supp.2d 332, 339
citation_a.parenthetical: "Judicial estoppel ... is an equitable doctrine invoked by a court at its discretion."
citation_a.sentence: See also Galin v. I.R.S., 563 F.Supp.2d 332, 339 (D.Conn.2008) (“Judicial estoppel ... is an equitable doctrine invoked by a court at its discretion.”).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 219 F.3d 79, 89
citation_b.parenthetical: "Judicial estoppel is designed to prevent a party who plays fast and loose with the courts from gaining unfair advantage through the deliberate adoption of inconsistent positions in successive suits."
citation_b.sentence: See Wight v. BankAmerica Corp., 219 F.3d 79, 89 (2d Cir.2000) (“Judicial estoppel is designed to prevent a party who plays fast and loose with the courts from gaining unfair advantage through the deliberate adoption of inconsistent positions in successive suits.”).