context: Given the unusually intrusive nature of computer searches, confirmation of the validity of third-party consent is worth the additional time and effort even during the pressures of arrest and investigation.
citation_a.signal: cf.
citation_a.identifier: 720 F.3d 436, 446-47
citation_a.parenthetical: where "property to be searched is a computer hard drive, the particularity requirement [for search warrants] assumes even greater importance" because the "potential for privacy violations ... is enormous"
citation_a.sentence: See United States v. Ganias, 824 F.3d 199, 231 (2d Cir. 2016) (Chin, J., dissenting) (“Virtually the entirety of a person’s life may be captured as [computer] data.”); United States v. Payton, 573 F.3d 859, 861-62 (9th Cir. 2009) (“[C]omputers are capable of storing immense amounts of information and often contain a great deal of private information.”); cf. United States v. Galpin, 720 F.3d 436, 446-47 (2d Cir. 2013) (where “property to be searched is a computer hard drive, the particularity requirement [for search warrants] assumes even greater importance” because the “potential for privacy violations ... is enormous”).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 573 F.3d 859, 861-62
citation_b.parenthetical: "[C]omputers are capable of storing immense amounts of information and often contain a great deal of private information."
citation_b.sentence: See United States v. Ganias, 824 F.3d 199, 231 (2d Cir. 2016) (Chin, J., dissenting) (“Virtually the entirety of a person’s life may be captured as [computer] data.”); United States v. Payton, 573 F.3d 859, 861-62 (9th Cir. 2009) (“[C]omputers are capable of storing immense amounts of information and often contain a great deal of private information.”); cf. United States v. Galpin, 720 F.3d 436, 446-47 (2d Cir. 2013) (where “property to be searched is a computer hard drive, the particularity requirement [for search warrants] assumes even greater importance” because the “potential for privacy violations ... is enormous”).