context: These arguments apply with equal force in the present case because Murphy's decision to file a federal court complaint before exhausting his administrative remedies threatens to undermine the hearing process established by the police department for the adjudication of disciplinary complaints.
citation_a.signal: but cf.
citation_a.identifier: 926 F.2d 567, 572-73
citation_a.parenthetical: Younger abstention does not apply if administrative proceedings have been completed and the agency's ruling has not been appealed
citation_a.sentence: See O’Neill v. City of Philadelphia, 32 F.3d 785, 791 (3d Cir.1994) (.Younger abstention applies to final administrative rulings that have not been appealed to state court); Alleghany Corp. v. Pomeroy, 898 F.2d 1314, 1317-18 (8th Cir.1990) (same); but cf. Norfolk & Western Ry. v. Pub. Util. Comm’n of Ohio, 926 F.2d 567, 572-73 (6th Cir.1991) (Younger abstention does not apply if administrative proceedings have been completed and the agency’s ruling has not been appealed); Thomas v. Texas State Bd. of Med. Exam’rs, 807 F.2d 453, 456 (5th Cir.1987) (same).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 32 F.3d 785, 791
citation_b.parenthetical: .Younger abstention applies to final administrative rulings that have not been appealed to state court
citation_b.sentence: See O’Neill v. City of Philadelphia, 32 F.3d 785, 791 (3d Cir.1994) (.Younger abstention applies to final administrative rulings that have not been appealed to state court); Alleghany Corp. v. Pomeroy, 898 F.2d 1314, 1317-18 (8th Cir.1990) (same); but cf. Norfolk & Western Ry. v. Pub. Util. Comm’n of Ohio, 926 F.2d 567, 572-73 (6th Cir.1991) (Younger abstention does not apply if administrative proceedings have been completed and the agency’s ruling has not been appealed); Thomas v. Texas State Bd. of Med. Exam’rs, 807 F.2d 453, 456 (5th Cir.1987) (same).