context: Osterhaus concludes most, if not all, of these matters could not have been discovered through reasonable inspection.
citation_a.signal: cf.
citation_a.identifier: 277 Kan. 411, 411
citation_a.parenthetical: buyer could not reasonably rely upon representations of seller when truth or falsity of representation would have been revealed by an inspection of the property, unless fraud "prevented the making of a full, fair, and complete examination of the property"
citation_a.sentence: Cf. Alires, 277 Kan. at 411 (buyer could not reasonably rely upon representations of seller when truth or falsity of representation would have been revealed by an inspection of the property, unless fraud “prevented the making of a full, fair, and complete examination of the property”).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 37 Kan. App. 2d 379, 379
citation_b.parenthetical: fraudulent nondisclosure, or fraud by silence, depends in large part on the buyer's inability to discover a defect with a reasonable inspection
citation_b.sentence: See Brennan, 37 Kan. App. 2d at 379 (fraudulent nondisclosure, or fraud by silence, depends in large part on the buyer’s inability to discover a defect with a reasonable inspection).