context: Where, as here, the United States seeks equitable relief brought by the United States under 18 U.S.C. SS 1964(a), "the government need not, as [Defendants] assert, demonstrate a new RICO violation to justify issuance of the injunction."
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 663 F.Supp. 192, 195
citation_a.parenthetical: rejecting argument that "the Government must show present RICO violations to secure [injunctive] relief'
citation_a.sentence: Local 560, 974 F.2d at 325 n. 5 (“[Defendant] erroneously argues ... that to succeed the government must prove a new RICO offense based on conduct which occurred after the March 16, 1984 Judgment Order”); see also United States v. Local 6A, Cement & Concrete Workers, 663 F.Supp. 192, 195 (S.D.N.Y.1986) (rejecting argument that “the Government must show present RICO violations to secure [injunctive] relief’).
citation_b.signal: no signal
citation_b.parenthetical: "[Defendant] erroneously argues ... that to succeed the government must prove a new RICO offense based on conduct which occurred after the March 16, 1984 Judgment Order"
citation_b.sentence: Local 560, 974 F.2d at 325 n. 5 (“[Defendant] erroneously argues ... that to succeed the government must prove a new RICO offense based on conduct which occurred after the March 16, 1984 Judgment Order”); see also United States v. Local 6A, Cement & Concrete Workers, 663 F.Supp. 192, 195 (S.D.N.Y.1986) (rejecting argument that “the Government must show present RICO violations to secure [injunctive] relief’).