context: In addition to not raising the catalyst theory in his opening brief, Mr. Klein further fails to produce evidence necessary to establish his entitlement to fees under the catalyst theory in any of the declarations or exhibits filed with his opening brief. See In re Hansen Natural Corp. Secs.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 2011 WL 9820198, at *3
citation_a.parenthetical: "Local Rule 7-5(b) of the Central District of California specifies that '[t]he evidence upon which the moving party will rely in support of the motion[]' 'shall be served and filed with the notice of the motion.' "
citation_a.sentence: Litig., 527 F.Supp.2d 1142, 1150 (C.D.Cal. 2007) (“[T]he Court will not consider evidence presented for the first time in a reply.”); see also Kruszka v. Toyota Motor Corp., No. CV 11-01578-RGK FFMx, 2011 WL 9820198, at *3 (C.D.Cal. Aug. 2, 2011) (“Local Rule 7-5(b) of the Central District of California specifies that ‘[t]he evidence upon which the moving party will rely in support of the motion[]’ ‘shall be served and filed with the notice of the motion.’ ”).
citation_b.signal: no signal
citation_b.identifier: 527 F.Supp.2d 1142, 1150
citation_b.parenthetical: "[T]he Court will not consider evidence presented for the first time in a reply."
citation_b.sentence: Litig., 527 F.Supp.2d 1142, 1150 (C.D.Cal. 2007) (“[T]he Court will not consider evidence presented for the first time in a reply.”); see also Kruszka v. Toyota Motor Corp., No. CV 11-01578-RGK FFMx, 2011 WL 9820198, at *3 (C.D.Cal. Aug. 2, 2011) (“Local Rule 7-5(b) of the Central District of California specifies that ‘[t]he evidence upon which the moving party will rely in support of the motion[]’ ‘shall be served and filed with the notice of the motion.’ ”).