context: Here the trial court properly awarded prejudgment interest from the date of the original verdict.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 294 Minn. 406, 408
citation_a.parenthetical: "interest should be calculated from the date the liability is established by the rendition of the verdict"
citation_a.sentence: See McCormack v. Hankscraft Co., 281 Minn. 571, 161 N.W.2d 523 (1968) (when jury verdict is erroneously overturned by grant of post-trial motion, but later reinstated on appeal, prejudgment interest is awarded from date of original verdict); see also Bastianson v. Forschen, 294 Minn. 406, 408, 202 N.W.2d 667, 668 (1972) (“interest should be calculated from the date the liability is established by the rendition of the verdict”).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.parenthetical: when jury verdict is erroneously overturned by grant of post-trial motion, but later reinstated on appeal, prejudgment interest is awarded from date of original verdict
citation_b.sentence: See McCormack v. Hankscraft Co., 281 Minn. 571, 161 N.W.2d 523 (1968) (when jury verdict is erroneously overturned by grant of post-trial motion, but later reinstated on appeal, prejudgment interest is awarded from date of original verdict); see also Bastianson v. Forschen, 294 Minn. 406, 408, 202 N.W.2d 667, 668 (1972) (“interest should be calculated from the date the liability is established by the rendition of the verdict”).