context: (Ex. A to Horbatiuk Aff. at LINA 1242.) Plaintiff did not receive the ACF until discovery, despite earlier requests for his entire claim file, and defendant has not attempted to show that the ACF complied with the amendment rule.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 2011 WL 4102143, at *4
citation_a.parenthetical: holding in the alternative that the ACF was unenforceable because it was "neither attached to nor endorsed on the policy"
citation_a.sentence: See Francis, 2011 WL 4102143, at *4 (holding in the alternative that the ACF was unenforceable because it was "neither attached to nor endorsed on the policy”); see also Heim v. Life Ins. Co. of N. Am., No Civ.A. 10-1567, 2010 WL 5300537, at *2 (E.D.Pa. Dec. 22, 2010) (finding ACF not a plan document where it was not attached to the policy or part of the claim file plaintiff was provided).
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.identifier: 2010 WL 5300537, at *2
citation_b.parenthetical: finding ACF not a plan document where it was not attached to the policy or part of the claim file plaintiff was provided
citation_b.sentence: See Francis, 2011 WL 4102143, at *4 (holding in the alternative that the ACF was unenforceable because it was "neither attached to nor endorsed on the policy”); see also Heim v. Life Ins. Co. of N. Am., No Civ.A. 10-1567, 2010 WL 5300537, at *2 (E.D.Pa. Dec. 22, 2010) (finding ACF not a plan document where it was not attached to the policy or part of the claim file plaintiff was provided).