context: Because none of the parties has identified non-party witnesses, this factor adds little to the court's analysis. Certainly, defendants have not demonstrated that the factor favors transfer.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 1993 WL 341274, *4
citation_a.parenthetical: "The movant is obligated to clearly specify the key witnesses to be called and make at least a generalized statement of what their testimony would have included"
citation_a.sentence: See Bohara, 390 F.Supp.2d at 963 (“If the [requested] transfer is for the convenience of witnesses, [the] defendant must name the witnesses it wishes to call, the anticipated area of their testimony and its relevance, and the reasons why the present forum would present hardship to them”); see also Fireman’s Fund Ins. Co. v. National Bank for Cooperatives, No. C 92-2667 BAC, 1993 WL 341274, *4 (N.D.Cal. Aug. 27, 1993) (“The movant is obligated to clearly specify the key witnesses to be called and make at least a generalized statement of what their testimony would have included”).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 390 F.Supp.2d 963, 963
citation_b.parenthetical: "If the [requested] transfer is for the convenience of witnesses, [the] defendant must name the witnesses it wishes to call, the anticipated area of their testimony and its relevance, and the reasons why the present forum would present hardship to them"
citation_b.sentence: See Bohara, 390 F.Supp.2d at 963 (“If the [requested] transfer is for the convenience of witnesses, [the] defendant must name the witnesses it wishes to call, the anticipated area of their testimony and its relevance, and the reasons why the present forum would present hardship to them”); see also Fireman’s Fund Ins. Co. v. National Bank for Cooperatives, No. C 92-2667 BAC, 1993 WL 341274, *4 (N.D.Cal. Aug. 27, 1993) (“The movant is obligated to clearly specify the key witnesses to be called and make at least a generalized statement of what their testimony would have included”).