context: . The time period does not begin to run until the client actually learns of his lawyer's default.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 842 S.W.2d 920, 922-3
citation_a.parenthetical: ruling that insured was damaged when insurance coverage was denied, not when the policy was delivered
citation_a.sentence: See Dixon, 649 S.W.2d at 438 (ruling that clients were damaged when their attorney informed them of his mistake, not necessarily when the mistake was actually made); Nuspl v. Missouri Medical Ins. Co., 842 S.W.2d 920, 922-3 (Mo.App.1992) (ruling that insured was damaged when insurance coverage was denied, not when the policy was delivered); see also O'Reilly v. Dock, 929 S.W.2d 297, 300 (Mo.App.1996) (distinguishing “layman/expert cases” where plaintiffs are unable to ascertain their injuries without the help of experts from “most cases" where plaintiffs can ascertain their own injuries).
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.identifier: 929 S.W.2d 297, 300
citation_b.parenthetical: distinguishing "layman/expert cases" where plaintiffs are unable to ascertain their injuries without the help of experts from "most cases" where plaintiffs can ascertain their own injuries
citation_b.sentence: See Dixon, 649 S.W.2d at 438 (ruling that clients were damaged when their attorney informed them of his mistake, not necessarily when the mistake was actually made); Nuspl v. Missouri Medical Ins. Co., 842 S.W.2d 920, 922-3 (Mo.App.1992) (ruling that insured was damaged when insurance coverage was denied, not when the policy was delivered); see also O'Reilly v. Dock, 929 S.W.2d 297, 300 (Mo.App.1996) (distinguishing “layman/expert cases” where plaintiffs are unable to ascertain their injuries without the help of experts from “most cases" where plaintiffs can ascertain their own injuries).