context: By contrast, here Plaintiff does not challenge any regulation or policy. Rather, she simply challenges Defendant's refusal to comply with the EEOC's order granting her relief. That order, however, addresses a "mere personal action" and provides merely injunctive relief that is "collateral to ... a money judgment."
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 794 F.2d 1036, 1036
citation_a.parenthetical: cases for non-monetary relief are allowed to proceed when "they involve challenges to the facial validity of military regulations and [are] not tied to discrete personnel matters."
citation_a.sentence: Wilkins, 279 F.3d at 786-87 (explaining the distinction between non-monetary claims subject to the Feres doctrine from the “[b]road-based declaratory and injunctive relief regarding Navy policies affecting the structure of the military chaplaincy” challenged by Wilkins); see also Watson v. Arkansas Nat. Guard, 886 F.2d at 1008-1010; Crawford v. Texas Army Nat. Guard, 794 F.2d at 1036 (cases for non-monetary relief are allowed to proceed when “they involve challenges to the facial validity of military regulations and [are] not tied to discrete personnel matters.”)
citation_b.signal: no signal
citation_b.identifier: 279 F.3d 786, 786-87
citation_b.parenthetical: explaining the distinction between non-monetary claims subject to the Feres doctrine from the "[b]road-based declaratory and injunctive relief regarding Navy policies affecting the structure of the military chaplaincy" challenged by Wilkins
citation_b.sentence: Wilkins, 279 F.3d at 786-87 (explaining the distinction between non-monetary claims subject to the Feres doctrine from the “[b]road-based declaratory and injunctive relief regarding Navy policies affecting the structure of the military chaplaincy” challenged by Wilkins); see also Watson v. Arkansas Nat. Guard, 886 F.2d at 1008-1010; Crawford v. Texas Army Nat. Guard, 794 F.2d at 1036 (cases for non-monetary relief are allowed to proceed when “they involve challenges to the facial validity of military regulations and [are] not tied to discrete personnel matters.”)