context: . Certain statements contained in Plaintiffs' 56.1 Statement also lack citations to any evidence in violation of Local Rule 56.1(d) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(c).
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 51 F.Supp.3d 414, 417-19
citation_a.parenthetical: finding statements "lackfing] citations to admissible evidence" to violate these rules
citation_a.sentence: See Baity v. Kralik, 51 F.Supp.3d 414, 417-19 (S.D.N.Y.2014) (finding statements "lackfing] citations to admissible evidence” to violate these rules); id. at 421 (disregarding facts "not supported by citations to admissible evidence in the record”); see also Holtz v. Rockefeller & Co., 258 F.3d 62, 73-74 (2d Cir.2001) (explaining that where there are no citations to admissible evidence, or the cited materials do not support the purported undisputed facts in a party’s Rule 56.1 statement, those assertions may be disregarded).
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.identifier: 258 F.3d 62, 73-74
citation_b.parenthetical: explaining that where there are no citations to admissible evidence, or the cited materials do not support the purported undisputed facts in a party's Rule 56.1 statement, those assertions may be disregarded
citation_b.sentence: See Baity v. Kralik, 51 F.Supp.3d 414, 417-19 (S.D.N.Y.2014) (finding statements "lackfing] citations to admissible evidence” to violate these rules); id. at 421 (disregarding facts "not supported by citations to admissible evidence in the record”); see also Holtz v. Rockefeller & Co., 258 F.3d 62, 73-74 (2d Cir.2001) (explaining that where there are no citations to admissible evidence, or the cited materials do not support the purported undisputed facts in a party’s Rule 56.1 statement, those assertions may be disregarded).