context: Moreover, as a specific example in the context of criminal intent, this court has indicated that the required criminal intent in carjacking cases is determined from the totality of the circumstances.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 421 F.3d 1119, 1123
citation_a.parenthetical: "We determine whether a defendant possesses the conditional intent necessary to support a carjacking conviction by considering the totality of the circumstances." (emphasis added
citation_a.sentence: See United States v. Malone, 222 F.3d 1286, 1291 (10th Cir.2000) (“[I]t is necessary to look at the totality of the circumstances to determine whether the words and actions of the defendants sufficiently demonstrate a conditional intent to cause serious bodily harm.” (emphasis added)); see also United States v. Vallejos, 421 F.3d 1119, 1123 (10th Cir.2005) (“We determine whether a defendant possesses the conditional intent necessary to support a carjacking conviction by considering the totality of the circumstances.” (emphasis added) (internal quotation marks omitted)).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 222 F.3d 1286, 1291
citation_b.parenthetical: "[I]t is necessary to look at the totality of the circumstances to determine whether the words and actions of the defendants sufficiently demonstrate a conditional intent to cause serious bodily harm." (emphasis added
citation_b.sentence: See United States v. Malone, 222 F.3d 1286, 1291 (10th Cir.2000) (“[I]t is necessary to look at the totality of the circumstances to determine whether the words and actions of the defendants sufficiently demonstrate a conditional intent to cause serious bodily harm.” (emphasis added)); see also United States v. Vallejos, 421 F.3d 1119, 1123 (10th Cir.2005) (“We determine whether a defendant possesses the conditional intent necessary to support a carjacking conviction by considering the totality of the circumstances.” (emphasis added) (internal quotation marks omitted)).