context: Because of the imminent threat of a serious conflict, disqualification would have been appropriate here even before any proceedings began.
citation_a.signal: cf.
citation_a.parenthetical: disqualification appropriate when conflict will taint a trial by affecting attorney's presentation of a case
citation_a.sentence: Cf. Armstrong v. McAlpin, 625 F.2d 433, 444-46 (2d Cir.1980) (en banc) (disqualification appropriate when conflict will taint a trial by affecting attorney’s presentation of a case), vacated on other grounds, 449 U.S. 1106, 101 S.Ct. 911, 66 L.Ed.2d 835 (1981).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 521 F.Supp. 87, 88-90
citation_b.parenthetical: granting motion to disqualify in virtually identical case because of "high potential for conflicting loyalties"
citation_b.sentence: See Shadid v. Jackson, 521 F.Supp. 87, 88-90 (E.D.Tex.1981) (granting motion to disqualify in virtually identical case because of “high potential for conflicting loyalties”).