context: The Supreme Court has found that some "statutes and regulations ... clearly establish fiduciary obligations of the Government."
citation_a.signal: no signal
citation_a.parenthetical: finding specific fiduciary duties of timber management in light of a statutory and regulatory'scheme creating obligations on "virtually every aspect of forest management"
citation_a.sentence: Mitchell, 463 U.S. at 226, 103 S.Ct. 2961; id. at 220, 103 S.Ct. 2961 (finding specific fiduciary duties of timber management in light of a statutory and regulatory'scheme creating obligations on “virtually every aspect of forest management”); see also White Mountain Apache Tribe, 537 U.S. at 475, 123 S.Ct. 1126 (finding specific fiduciary duties to maintain and preserve property that is “actually administered]” in trust). But where the relevant statute cannot be fairly read as imposing the specific fiduciary duty alleged to be breached, the Court has refused to impose the obligation on the government.
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 537 U.S. 507, 507-13
citation_b.parenthetical: finding no specific fiduciary duties to ensure a specific rate of return on coal leases or to proscribe ex parte communications in an administrative appeal process
citation_b.sentence: See Navajo Nation I, 537 U.S. at 507-13, 123 S.Ct. 1079 (finding no specific fiduciary duties to ensure a specific rate of return on coal leases or to proscribe ex parte communications in an administrative appeal process); United States v. Jicarilla Apache Nation, 564 U.S. 162, 131 S.Ct. 2313, 2329-30, 180 L.Ed.2d 187 (201-1) (finding no specific fiduciary duty to disclose, all information related to the administration of Indian trusts); see also Hopi Tribe, 782 F.3d at 668-71 (finding no specific fiduciary duty to ensure adequate water quality on the Hopi reservation).