context: At the same time, the VRPA is as targeted as it is comprehensive, protecting consumer data while "allowing the information's ... disclosure in only a few narrow and well-justified circumstances." Additionally, there is no evidence that the Michigan legislature enacted the VRPA because it disagreed with the message of those who use consumer identifying information.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.parenthetical: "Vermont may be displeased that [marketers] ... are effective in promoting brand-name drugs -- But [it cannot] burden the speech of others in order to tilt public debate in a preferred direction,"
citation_a.sentence: See id, at 578-79, 131 S.Ct. 2653 (“Vermont may be displeased that [marketers] ... are effective in promoting brand-name drugs — But [it cannot] burden the speech of others in order to tilt public debate in a preferred direction,”); see also King, 903 F.Supp.2d at 309 (“[T]he Somll decision largely rested on the fact that Vermont was restraining a certain form of speech communicated by a certain speaker solely because of the State’s disagreement with it.”). ■
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.identifier: 903 F.Supp.2d 309, 309
citation_b.parenthetical: "[T]he Somll decision largely rested on the fact that Vermont was restraining a certain form of speech communicated by a certain speaker solely because of the State's disagreement with it."
citation_b.sentence: See id, at 578-79, 131 S.Ct. 2653 (“Vermont may be displeased that [marketers] ... are effective in promoting brand-name drugs — But [it cannot] burden the speech of others in order to tilt public debate in a preferred direction,”); see also King, 903 F.Supp.2d at 309 (“[T]he Somll decision largely rested on the fact that Vermont was restraining a certain form of speech communicated by a certain speaker solely because of the State’s disagreement with it.”). ■