context: We conclude that Funtanilla adequately alleged deliberate indifference under the Eighth Amendment. Specifically, Funtanilla alleged that while he was in the suicide prevention cell, "defendant Rubles observed him once during the night cutting his arm."
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 828 F.2d 556, 561
citation_a.parenthetical: indicating at dismissal all reasonable inferences are drawn in favor of the plaintiff
citation_a.sentence: See Usher v. City of Los Angeles, 828 F.2d 556, 561 (9th Cir.1987) (indicating at dismissal all reasonable inferences are drawn in favor of the plaintiff).
citation_b.signal: no signal
citation_b.identifier: 70 F.3d 1074, 1077
citation_b.parenthetical: indicating circumstantial evidence may be sufficient to show prison official's knowledge of risk
citation_b.sentence: (Complaint at 2, ¶ 10). See Farmer, 511 U.S. at 837, 114 S.Ct. 1970 (holding prison official is deliberately indifferent if he knew that prisoner faced a substantial risk of harm and disregarded that risk); Wallis v. Baldwin, 70 F.3d 1074, 1077 (9th Cir.1995) (indicating circumstantial evidence may be sufficient to show prison official’s knowledge of risk). Funtanilla also alleged that Rubles left the hospital “after 3 A.M.,” and that he was not removed from the suicide prevention cell until 5 A.M., covered in his own blood.