context: We also will assume, again without deciding, that the judicial defendants and the administrator defendants are not immune from suit. Further, we assume, without deciding, that at least one of the plaintiffs had standing to bring this suit at the time the initial complaint was filed.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 317 F.3d 45, 58
citation_a.parenthetical: standing is based on the facts as they existed at the time the complaint was filed
citation_a.sentence: See Mangual v. Rotger-Sabat, 317 F.3d 45, 58 (1st Cir.2003) (standing is based on the facts as they existed at the time the complaint was filed); see also Friends of the Earth, Inc, v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc., 528 U.S. 167, 170, 120 S.Ct. 693, 145 L.Ed.2d 610 (2000) (“The requisite personal interest that must exist at the commencement of the litigation (standing) must continue throughout its existence (mootness).”).
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.parenthetical: "The requisite personal interest that must exist at the commencement of the litigation (standing) must continue throughout its existence (mootness)."
citation_b.sentence: See Mangual v. Rotger-Sabat, 317 F.3d 45, 58 (1st Cir.2003) (standing is based on the facts as they existed at the time the complaint was filed); see also Friends of the Earth, Inc, v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc., 528 U.S. 167, 170, 120 S.Ct. 693, 145 L.Ed.2d 610 (2000) (“The requisite personal interest that must exist at the commencement of the litigation (standing) must continue throughout its existence (mootness).”).