context: The district court properly dismissed Brown's "denial of self-defense" claims, retaliation claim based on his complaint of excessive force, and due process claims because Brown failed to allege facts sufficient to state a plausible claim.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 515 U.S. 472, 486
citation_a.parenthetical: "[S]egregated confinement [does] not present the type of atypical, significant deprivation in which a State might conceivably create a liberty interest."
citation_a.sentence: See Hebbe, 627 F.3d at 341-42 (although pro se pleadings are liberally construed, a plaintiff must still present factual allegations sufficient to state a plausible claim for relief); see also Sandin v. Conner, 515 U.S. 472, 486, 115 S.Ct. 2293, 132 L.Ed.2d 418 (1995) (“[S]egregated confinement [does] not present the type of atypical, significant deprivation in which a State might conceivably create a liberty interest.”); Brodheim v. Cry, 584 F.3d 1262, 1269 (9th Cir. 2009) (setting forth elements of retaliation claim in prisoner context).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 627 F.3d 341, 341-42
citation_b.parenthetical: although pro se pleadings are liberally construed, a plaintiff must still present factual allegations sufficient to state a plausible claim for relief
citation_b.sentence: See Hebbe, 627 F.3d at 341-42 (although pro se pleadings are liberally construed, a plaintiff must still present factual allegations sufficient to state a plausible claim for relief); see also Sandin v. Conner, 515 U.S. 472, 486, 115 S.Ct. 2293, 132 L.Ed.2d 418 (1995) (“[S]egregated confinement [does] not present the type of atypical, significant deprivation in which a State might conceivably create a liberty interest.”); Brodheim v. Cry, 584 F.3d 1262, 1269 (9th Cir. 2009) (setting forth elements of retaliation claim in prisoner context).