context: As one example of such a sufficiently distant event, the Court cited a "collapse of the collective-bargaining relationship, as evidenced by decertification of the union." Id.)
citation_a.signal: no signal
citation_a.identifier: 50 F.3d 1057, 1057
citation_a.parenthetical: "If employees wish to seek the protections of the Sherman Act, they may forego unionization or even decertify their unions."
citation_a.sentence: Brown, 50 F.3d at 1057 (“If employees wish to seek the protections of the Sherman Act, they may forego unionization or even decertify their unions.”); see also NBA v. Williams, 857 F.Supp. 1069, 1078 (S.D.N.Y.1994) (pre dieting the players can avoid the labor injunction if they disclaim the union as their collective bargaining agent); Powell v. NFL, 764 F.Supp. 1351, 1356-57 (D.Minn.1991) (holding that the ongoing collective bargaining relationship ends, and the nonstatutory labor exemption no longer applies, when the players vote to repudiate the union).
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.identifier: 764 F.Supp. 1351, 1356-57
citation_b.parenthetical: holding that the ongoing collective bargaining relationship ends, and the nonstatutory labor exemption no longer applies, when the players vote to repudiate the union
citation_b.sentence: Brown, 50 F.3d at 1057 (“If employees wish to seek the protections of the Sherman Act, they may forego unionization or even decertify their unions.”); see also NBA v. Williams, 857 F.Supp. 1069, 1078 (S.D.N.Y.1994) (pre dieting the players can avoid the labor injunction if they disclaim the union as their collective bargaining agent); Powell v. NFL, 764 F.Supp. 1351, 1356-57 (D.Minn.1991) (holding that the ongoing collective bargaining relationship ends, and the nonstatutory labor exemption no longer applies, when the players vote to repudiate the union).