context: "When the district court has affirmed the bankruptcy court's findings ... we will apply the clearly erroneous doctrine with particular rigor." Additionally, when we examine the facts adduced at trial, generally we will not disturb a bankruptcy court's credibility determinations.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 95 F.3d 1028, 1030
citation_a.parenthetical: requiring a reviewing court to "give due regard" to a bankruptcy court's credibility judgments
citation_a.sentence: See In re Englander, 95 F.3d 1028, 1030 (11th Cir.1996) (requiring a reviewing court to “give due regard” to a bankruptcy court’s credibility judgments); see also United States v. Peters, 403 F.3d 1263, 1270 (11th Cir.2005) (recognizing that “[assessing witness credibility is uniquely the function of the trier of fact”). Here, to the extent the appellants dispute the relevant facts, they rely exclusively on evidence drawn from their own testimony, which the bankruptcy judge expressly disbelieved.
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.identifier: 403 F.3d 1263, 1270
citation_b.parenthetical: recognizing that "[assessing witness credibility is uniquely the function of the trier of fact"
citation_b.sentence: See In re Englander, 95 F.3d 1028, 1030 (11th Cir.1996) (requiring a reviewing court to “give due regard” to a bankruptcy court’s credibility judgments); see also United States v. Peters, 403 F.3d 1263, 1270 (11th Cir.2005) (recognizing that “[assessing witness credibility is uniquely the function of the trier of fact”). Here, to the extent the appellants dispute the relevant facts, they rely exclusively on evidence drawn from their own testimony, which the bankruptcy judge expressly disbelieved.