context: Finally, we reject Pisabaj-Mejia's contention that the BIA committed legal error in assessing his argument for a continuance for prosecutorial discretion.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.parenthetical: prosecutorial discretion by the agency can be granted at any stage of the administrative process
citation_a.sentence: See Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir.2000) (explaining that a petitioner must show error and prejudice to prevail on a due process claim); see also Reno v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee, 525 U.S. 471, 483-85, 119 S.Ct. 936, 142 L.Ed.2d 940 (1999) (prosecutorial discretion by the agency can be granted at any stage of the administrative process).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 204 F.3d 1241, 1246
citation_b.parenthetical: explaining that a petitioner must show error and prejudice to prevail on a due process claim
citation_b.sentence: See Lata v. INS, 204 F.3d 1241, 1246 (9th Cir.2000) (explaining that a petitioner must show error and prejudice to prevail on a due process claim); see also Reno v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee, 525 U.S. 471, 483-85, 119 S.Ct. 936, 142 L.Ed.2d 940 (1999) (prosecutorial discretion by the agency can be granted at any stage of the administrative process).