context: .Some jurisdictions that consider otherwise excluded inheritances as deviations from presumptive child support guidelines have identified an approach that should be helpful in assuring that all applicable factors are fairly considered in the analysis.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.parenthetical: suggesting first a calculation under the guideline formula before deviating when strict application produces an unjust result
citation_a.sentence: See, e.g., Connell, supra, 712 A.2d at 1269-70 (explaining that child support should be calculated first utilizing the parties’ gross income as defined in the child support guidelines before undertaking an analysis of statutory factors for deviation); see also Cody v. Evans-Cody, 291 A.D.2d 27, 735 N.Y.S.2d 181 (2001) (suggesting first a calculation under the guideline formula before deviating when strict application produces an unjust result).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 712 A.2d 1269, 1269-70
citation_b.parenthetical: explaining that child support should be calculated first utilizing the parties' gross income as defined in the child support guidelines before undertaking an analysis of statutory factors for deviation
citation_b.sentence: See, e.g., Connell, supra, 712 A.2d at 1269-70 (explaining that child support should be calculated first utilizing the parties’ gross income as defined in the child support guidelines before undertaking an analysis of statutory factors for deviation); see also Cody v. Evans-Cody, 291 A.D.2d 27, 735 N.Y.S.2d 181 (2001) (suggesting first a calculation under the guideline formula before deviating when strict application produces an unjust result).