context: Pis.' Post-Trial Br. at 58-59. The court, however, does not have jurisdiction to award relief for future infringements.
citation_a.signal: no signal
citation_a.identifier: 228 Ct.Cl. 780, 784
citation_a.parenthetical: "[R]elief for future infringements is beyond the power of the court by declaratory judgment or otherwise."
citation_a.sentence: De Graffenried v. United States, 228 Ct.Cl. 780, 784 (1981) (“[R]elief for future infringements is beyond the power of the court by declaratory judgment or otherwise.”); see also Motorola, 729 F.2d at 768 n,3 (“[I]njunctive relief under 35 U.S.C. § 283 is not available to a patent owner in a [Section] 1498 action.”) (citations omitted).
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.parenthetical: "[I]njunctive relief under 35 U.S.C. SS 283 is not available to a patent owner in a [Section] 1498 action."
citation_b.sentence: De Graffenried v. United States, 228 Ct.Cl. 780, 784 (1981) (“[R]elief for future infringements is beyond the power of the court by declaratory judgment or otherwise.”); see also Motorola, 729 F.2d at 768 n,3 (“[I]njunctive relief under 35 U.S.C. § 283 is not available to a patent owner in a [Section] 1498 action.”) (citations omitted).