context: The fact that Plaintiff decided not to exhaust the available administrative remedies by appealing to the BCNR does not affect the court's jurisdiction.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 333 F.3d 1295, 1304
citation_a.parenthetical: "[T]he failure to seek relief from a correction board ... does not prevent the plaintiff from suing immediately[.]"
citation_a.sentence: See Martinez v. United States, 333 F.3d 1295, 1304 (Fed.Cir.2003) (“[T]he failure to seek relief from a correction board ... does not prevent the plaintiff from suing immediately[.]”); see also Richey v. United States, 322 F.3d 1317, 1323 (Fed.Cir.2003) (“An officer seeking correction of military records may either apply as an initial matter to a Corrections Board, or file suit under the Tucker Act in the [United States] Court of Federal Claims.”).
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.identifier: 322 F.3d 1317, 1323
citation_b.parenthetical: "An officer seeking correction of military records may either apply as an initial matter to a Corrections Board, or file suit under the Tucker Act in the [United States] Court of Federal Claims."
citation_b.sentence: See Martinez v. United States, 333 F.3d 1295, 1304 (Fed.Cir.2003) (“[T]he failure to seek relief from a correction board ... does not prevent the plaintiff from suing immediately[.]”); see also Richey v. United States, 322 F.3d 1317, 1323 (Fed.Cir.2003) (“An officer seeking correction of military records may either apply as an initial matter to a Corrections Board, or file suit under the Tucker Act in the [United States] Court of Federal Claims.”).