context: In this case, Rivas claims that the defendants detained her for longer than they had authority to. Allegations of detention without authority can support a claim of violation of constitutional rights.
citation_a.signal: cf.
citation_a.identifier: 255 F.3d 1, 4
citation_a.parenthetical: "We nonetheless wish to note that aliens arrested for status offenses are not without protection from excessively long detentions."
citation_a.sentence: Armstrong v. Squadrito, 152 F.3d 564, 578 (7th Cir.1998) (“In a consti tutional sense, how much more basic could it get — jails cannot confine people without authority to do so.”); cf. United States v. Tejada, 255 F.3d 1, 4 (1st Cir.2001) (“We nonetheless wish to note that aliens arrested for status offenses are not without protection from excessively long detentions.”).
citation_b.signal: no signal
citation_b.identifier: 152 F.3d 564, 578
citation_b.parenthetical: "In a consti tutional sense, how much more basic could it get -- jails cannot confine people without authority to do so."
citation_b.sentence: Armstrong v. Squadrito, 152 F.3d 564, 578 (7th Cir.1998) (“In a consti tutional sense, how much more basic could it get — jails cannot confine people without authority to do so.”); cf. United States v. Tejada, 255 F.3d 1, 4 (1st Cir.2001) (“We nonetheless wish to note that aliens arrested for status offenses are not without protection from excessively long detentions.”).