context: We cannot say, on the record presented to us, that either of these statements show extrinsic influence on Juror Hart or any other juror. Porter's Affidavit does not allege that Hart was influenced by these external communications, and neither William nor Chantal offer any other evidence to show that juror Hart was influenced in any way.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 761 F.2d 1459, 1465
citation_a.parenthetical: recognizing, that "failure to hold a hearing constitutes ah abuse of discretion only where there is evidence that the jury was subjected to influence by outside sources."
citation_a.sentence: See United States v. Watchmaker, 761 F.2d 1459, 1465 (11th Cir.1985) (recognizing, that “failure to hold a hearing constitutes ah abuse of discretion only where there is evidence that the jury was subjected to influence by outside sources.”).
citation_b.signal: cf.
citation_b.identifier: 733 F.2d 842, 851
citation_b.parenthetical: recognizing that trial court is obligated to conduct evidentiary hearing only when defendant makes "a colorable showing of extrinsic influence.... "
citation_b.sentence: Cf. United States v. Barshov, 733 F.2d 842, 851 (11th Cir.1984) (recognizing that trial court is obligated to conduct evidentiary hearing only when defendant makes “a colorable showing of extrinsic influence.... ”).