context: Again, the court has considerable doubt that the evidence presented at trial will show anything but that Land O' Lakes acted in a reasonable fashion either to assist Corcoran or to protect its own reasonable financial interests. However, the court concludes that on the present record, the question is one for the jury.
citation_a.signal: cf.
citation_a.identifier: 128 F.3d 1205, 1205
citation_a.parenthetical: requiring particular deference to the non-movant on summary judgment in discrimination cases, because such cases are based on inferences from circumstantial evidence of discriminatory motive
citation_a.sentence: Cf., e.g., Snow, 128 F.3d at 1205 (requiring particular deference to the non-movant on summary judgment in discrimination cases, because such cases are based on inferences from circumstantial evidence of discriminatory motive); Webb, 94 F.3d at 486 (same); Wooten, 58 F.3d at 385 (same).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 90 F.3d 1376, 1376-77
citation_b.parenthetical: on a motion for summary judgment, the court must determine whether there are genuine issues for trial
citation_b.sentence: See Quick, 90 F.3d at 1376-77 (on a motion for summary judgment, the court must determine whether there are genuine issues for trial); Johnson, 906 F.2d at 1237. In particular, the question of a defendant’s motive, as it can be inferred from circumstantial evidence, seems to the court to be a matter particularly appropriaté for jury determination.