context: 128 Norris further asserts that Article I, Section 14 of the Utah Constitution, Utah's counterpart to the Fourth Amendment, forbids the "all records" search warrant issued by the magistrate. We decline to address this argument because Norris provides us with no substantive reason for construing Article I, Section 14 of the Utah Constitution, which is nearly identical to the Fourth Amendment, as affording him greater protection than the Fourth Amendment.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.parenthetical: deciding only the appellant's federal constitutional claim be cause she failed to support her state constitutional argument with any substantive analysis
citation_a.sentence: See State v: Davis, 972 P.2d 388, 392 (Utah 1998) (refusing to discuss defendant's state constitutional argument because he failed to support it with any substantive analysis that warranted distinct analytical treatment); see also State v. Real Property at 688 E. 640 N., 2000 UT 17, ¶5, 994 P.2d 1254 (deciding only the appellant's federal constitutional claim be cause she failed to support her state constitutional argument with any substantive analysis).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 972 P.2d 388, 392
citation_b.parenthetical: refusing to discuss defendant's state constitutional argument because he failed to support it with any substantive analysis that warranted distinct analytical treatment
citation_b.sentence: See State v: Davis, 972 P.2d 388, 392 (Utah 1998) (refusing to discuss defendant's state constitutional argument because he failed to support it with any substantive analysis that warranted distinct analytical treatment); see also State v. Real Property at 688 E. 640 N., 2000 UT 17, ¶5, 994 P.2d 1254 (deciding only the appellant's federal constitutional claim be cause she failed to support her state constitutional argument with any substantive analysis).