context: Most of Count I can be disposed of summarily. AJi's complaint indicates that she has suffered discrimination on the basis of several protected characteristics, but she pursues only Title VII race discrimination in her brief. Her failure to support the remaining claims with legal argument or authority waives them.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 975 F.2d 1336, 1341
citation_a.parenthetical: plaintiff waived disparate impact claim alleged in complaint because she did not fulfill her "minimal responsibility of identifying the applicable law and arguing why the facts ... fit into the parameters of that law."
citation_a.sentence: See Reidt v. County of Trempealeau, 975 F.2d 1336, 1341 (7th Cir.1992) (plaintiff waived disparate impact claim alleged in complaint because she did not fulfill her “minimal responsibility of identifying the applicable law and arguing why the facts ... fit into the parameters of that law.”); see also Freeman United Coal Mining Co. v. Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs, 957 F.2d 302, 305 (7th Cir.1992) (“[W]e have no obligation to consider an issue that is ... not developed [ ] in a party’s brief.”).
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.identifier: 957 F.2d 302, 305
citation_b.parenthetical: "[W]e have no obligation to consider an issue that is ... not developed [ ] in a party's brief."
citation_b.sentence: See Reidt v. County of Trempealeau, 975 F.2d 1336, 1341 (7th Cir.1992) (plaintiff waived disparate impact claim alleged in complaint because she did not fulfill her “minimal responsibility of identifying the applicable law and arguing why the facts ... fit into the parameters of that law.”); see also Freeman United Coal Mining Co. v. Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs, 957 F.2d 302, 305 (7th Cir.1992) (“[W]e have no obligation to consider an issue that is ... not developed [ ] in a party’s brief.”).