context: . Moreover, the allegations may state a claim under a substantive due process analysis.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.parenthetical: holding that mere neglect for prisoner's safety does not amount to a substantive due process violation, implying that intent to do harm would be an abuse of government power and amount to a substantive due process violation
citation_a.sentence: See Davidson v. Cannon, 474 U.S. 344, 106 S.Ct. 668, 88 L.Ed.2d 677 (1986) (holding that mere neglect for prisoner’s safety does not amount to a substantive due process violation, implying that intent to do harm would be an abuse of government power and amount to a substantive due process violation).
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.identifier: 944 F.2d 347, 347-49
citation_b.parenthetical: discussing Davidson and the required mental state of prison officials in prisoner assault cases
citation_b.sentence: See also McGill, 944 F.2d at 347-49 (discussing Davidson and the required mental state of prison officials in prisoner assault cases).