context: Only where there are no disputed questions of historical fact does the court make the excessive force determination on its own, such as on summary judgment.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 535 F.3d 1210, 1215
citation_a.parenthetical: noting that "while probable cause is usually a question for the jury, a court should decide it when there is no genuine issue of material fact"
citation_a.sentence: See Keylon v. City of Albuquerque, 535 F.3d 1210, 1215 (10th Cir.2008) (noting that “while probable cause is usually a question for the jury, a court should decide it when there is no genuine issue of material fact”); see also Scott v. Harris, 550 U.S. 372, 386, 127 S.Ct. 1769, 167 L.Ed.2d 686 (2007) (concluding that officer’s conduct in ending high-speed chase was objectively reasonable given undisputed video showing recklessness of fleeing driver).
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.parenthetical: concluding that officer's conduct in ending high-speed chase was objectively reasonable given undisputed video showing recklessness of fleeing driver
citation_b.sentence: See Keylon v. City of Albuquerque, 535 F.3d 1210, 1215 (10th Cir.2008) (noting that “while probable cause is usually a question for the jury, a court should decide it when there is no genuine issue of material fact”); see also Scott v. Harris, 550 U.S. 372, 386, 127 S.Ct. 1769, 167 L.Ed.2d 686 (2007) (concluding that officer’s conduct in ending high-speed chase was objectively reasonable given undisputed video showing recklessness of fleeing driver).