context: The affidavit claimed the informants were ordinary citizens whose reliability can be presumed; moreover, the tips were corroborated by Officer Cross' observation of the traffic to the residence.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 274 N.W.2d 113, 116
citation_a.parenthetical: warrant may place "minimal reliance" on informant's tip even if informant's reliability not shown where there is an independent source
citation_a.sentence: See State v. Eling, 355 N.W.2d 286, 291 (Minn.1984) (lack of showing of informant’s reliability is not fatal where the tip is corroborated); see also State v. Siegfried, 274 N.W.2d 113, 116 (Minn.1978) (warrant may place “minimal reliance” on informant’s tip even if informant’s reliability not shown where there is an independent source).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 355 N.W.2d 286, 291
citation_b.parenthetical: lack of showing of informant's reliability is not fatal where the tip is corroborated
citation_b.sentence: See State v. Eling, 355 N.W.2d 286, 291 (Minn.1984) (lack of showing of informant’s reliability is not fatal where the tip is corroborated); see also State v. Siegfried, 274 N.W.2d 113, 116 (Minn.1978) (warrant may place “minimal reliance” on informant’s tip even if informant’s reliability not shown where there is an independent source).