context: Such a threat is considered especially substantial when the administrative agency "ha[s] not disavowed enforcement if [the plaintiffs] make similar statements in the future." Moreover, the threat need not stem from a criminal action: "[A]dminis-trative action, like arrest or prosecution, may give rise to harm sufficient to justify pre-enforcement review."
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.parenthetical: "If a reasonable threat of prosecution creates a ripe controversy, we fail to see how the actual filing of the administrative action threatening sanctions in this case does not."
citation_a.sentence: SBA List, 134 S.Ct. at 2345 (noting that the threat of administrative proceedings was “a substantial one” but declining to “decide whether that threat standing alone gives rise to an Article III injury”); see also Ohio Civil Rights Comm’n v. Dayton Christian Schs., Inc., 477 U.S. 619, 625-26 n. 1, 106 S.Ct. 2718, 91 L.Ed.2d 512 (1986) (“If a reasonable threat of prosecution creates a ripe controversy, we fail to see how the actual filing of the administrative action threatening sanctions in this case does not.”).
citation_b.signal: no signal
citation_b.identifier: 134 S.Ct. 2345, 2345
citation_b.parenthetical: noting that the threat of administrative proceedings was "a substantial one" but declining to "decide whether that threat standing alone gives rise to an Article III injury"
citation_b.sentence: SBA List, 134 S.Ct. at 2345 (noting that the threat of administrative proceedings was “a substantial one” but declining to “decide whether that threat standing alone gives rise to an Article III injury”); see also Ohio Civil Rights Comm’n v. Dayton Christian Schs., Inc., 477 U.S. 619, 625-26 n. 1, 106 S.Ct. 2718, 91 L.Ed.2d 512 (1986) (“If a reasonable threat of prosecution creates a ripe controversy, we fail to see how the actual filing of the administrative action threatening sanctions in this case does not.”).