context: Unfortunately for Hall, the failure to object to the recommendations and decisions of a magistrate judge is one instance we have held waiver of appellate review results. The purpose of this waiver rule is to promote efficiency between the district and appellate courts, so that district courts have the opportunity to nip errors in the bud without requiring them to conduct plenary reviews of proceedings supervised by magistrate judges.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 170 F.3d 734, 742
citation_a.parenthetical: sandbagging problem identified in Thomas may be cured with adequate notice to the district judge of the contested issues
citation_a.sentence: See Hernandez-Rivas, 348 F.3d at 598 (citing Thomas v. Am, 474 U.S. 140, 147, 106 S.Ct. 466, 88 L.Ed.2d 435 (1985)); Lockert v. Faulkner, 843 F.2d 1015, 1017-18 (7th Cir.1988) (holding the rationale of Thomas requires waiver to apply to each issue not included in an objection); see also Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 742 (7th Cir.1999) (sandbagging problem identified in Thomas may be cured with adequate notice to the district judge of the contested issues).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 843 F.2d 1015, 1017-18
citation_b.parenthetical: holding the rationale of Thomas requires waiver to apply to each issue not included in an objection
citation_b.sentence: See Hernandez-Rivas, 348 F.3d at 598 (citing Thomas v. Am, 474 U.S. 140, 147, 106 S.Ct. 466, 88 L.Ed.2d 435 (1985)); Lockert v. Faulkner, 843 F.2d 1015, 1017-18 (7th Cir.1988) (holding the rationale of Thomas requires waiver to apply to each issue not included in an objection); see also Johnson v. Zema Sys. Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 742 (7th Cir.1999) (sandbagging problem identified in Thomas may be cured with adequate notice to the district judge of the contested issues).