context: "Allowing a plaintiff to abandon the administrative remedies he has initiated would tend to frustrate the ability of the agency to deal with complaints. All participants would know that at any moment an impatient complainant could take his claim to court and abort the administrative proceedings."
citation_a.signal: no signal
citation_a.identifier: 2006 WL 2051730, at *3
citation_a.parenthetical: holding that plaintiff was not allowed to voluntarily withdraw her complaint after electing to have her complaint heard before an administrative law judge
citation_a.sentence: Gagnon v. Potter, No. 3:05-CV-324RM, 2006 WL 2051730, at *3 (N.D.Ind. July 19, 2006) (holding that plaintiff was not allowed to voluntarily withdraw her complaint after electing to have her complaint heard before an administrative law judge); see also Mackay v. USPS, 607 F.Supp. 271, 276 (E.D.Pa.1985) (“The exhaustion requirement is not met by plaintiffs taking the initial administrative steps and then abandoning the process.”)
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.identifier: 607 F.Supp. 271, 276
citation_b.parenthetical: "The exhaustion requirement is not met by plaintiffs taking the initial administrative steps and then abandoning the process."
citation_b.sentence: Gagnon v. Potter, No. 3:05-CV-324RM, 2006 WL 2051730, at *3 (N.D.Ind. July 19, 2006) (holding that plaintiff was not allowed to voluntarily withdraw her complaint after electing to have her complaint heard before an administrative law judge); see also Mackay v. USPS, 607 F.Supp. 271, 276 (E.D.Pa.1985) (“The exhaustion requirement is not met by plaintiffs taking the initial administrative steps and then abandoning the process.”)