context: (Emphases added.) Because HRCP 12(b) is identical to Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP), the federal courts' interpretation of this rule is highly persuasive.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 10 Haw.App. 388, 394
citation_a.parenthetical: because HRCP Rule 41(b) is identical to FRCP Rule 41(b), the U.S. Supreme Court's interpretation of the federal rule is persuasive
citation_a.sentence: See Harada v. Burns, 50 Haw. 528, 532, 445 P.2d 376, 380 (1968) (federal courts’ interpretations of the FRCP are deemed “highly persuasive in, the reasoning of this court” since the HRCP were patterned after the federal rules); see also Compass Dev., Inc. v. Blevins, 10 Haw.App. 388, 394, 876 P.2d 1335, 1338 (1994) (because HRCP Rule 41(b) is identical to FRCP Rule 41(b), the U.S. Supreme Court’s interpretation of the federal rule is persuasive).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 445 P.2d 376, 380
citation_b.parenthetical: federal courts' interpretations of the FRCP are deemed "highly persuasive in, the reasoning of this court" since the HRCP were patterned after the federal rules
citation_b.sentence: See Harada v. Burns, 50 Haw. 528, 532, 445 P.2d 376, 380 (1968) (federal courts’ interpretations of the FRCP are deemed “highly persuasive in, the reasoning of this court” since the HRCP were patterned after the federal rules); see also Compass Dev., Inc. v. Blevins, 10 Haw.App. 388, 394, 876 P.2d 1335, 1338 (1994) (because HRCP Rule 41(b) is identical to FRCP Rule 41(b), the U.S. Supreme Court’s interpretation of the federal rule is persuasive).