context: "[A] party's objections to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation must be both timely and specific to preserve an issue for de novo review by the district court or for appellate review."
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 980 F.2d 1342, 1352
citation_a.parenthetical: by then-failure to file objections, plaintiffs waived their right to appeal the magistrate's ruling
citation_a.sentence: See Vega v. Suthers, 195 F.3d 573, 579-80 (10th Cir.1999) (district court’s decision to review a magistrate’s recommendation de novo despite the lack of an objection does not preclude application of the “firm waiver rule”); One Parcel of Real Property, 73 F.3d at 1059-60 (a party’s objections to the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation must be both timely and specific to preserve an issue for de novo review by the district court or for appellate review); International Surplus Lines Insurance Co. v. Wyoming Coal Refining Systems, Inc., 52 F.3d 901, 904 (10th Cir.1995) (by failing to object to certain portions of the magistrate’s order, cross-claimant had waived its right to appeal those portions of the ruling); Ayala v. United States, 980 F.2d 1342, 1352 (10th Cir.1992) (by then-failure to file objections, plaintiffs waived their right to appeal the magistrate’s ruling).
citation_b.signal: but see
citation_b.identifier: 418 F.3d 1116, 1122
citation_b.parenthetical: firm waiver rule does not apply when the interests of justice require review
citation_b.sentence: But see, Morales-Fernandez v. INS, 418 F.3d 1116, 1122 (10th Cir.2005) (firm waiver rule does not apply when the interests of justice require review).