context: Pinell testified that these same events took place "some" time after 6:25 a.m. Accordingly, there is no direct conflict between the two accounts, and the evidence related to the parking lot video is sufficiently reliable to merit consideration.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 783 F.2d 776, 815
citation_a.parenthetical: "The magistrate does not weigh conflicting evidence and make factual determinations but, rather, determines only where there is competent evidence to support the belief that the accused has committed the charged offense."
citation_a.sentence: See In re Sainez, 2008 WL 366135 at *18, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9573 at *55-56 (rejecting inconsistencies and conflicts as “not sufficient to negate the showing of probable cause.”); see also Quinn v. Robinson, 783 F.2d 776, 815 (9th Cir.1986) (“The magistrate does not weigh conflicting evidence and make factual determinations but, rather, determines only where there is competent evidence to support the belief that the accused has committed the charged offense.”).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 2008 WL 366135, at *18
citation_b.parenthetical: rejecting inconsistencies and conflicts as "not sufficient to negate the showing of probable cause."
citation_b.sentence: See In re Sainez, 2008 WL 366135 at *18, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9573 at *55-56 (rejecting inconsistencies and conflicts as “not sufficient to negate the showing of probable cause.”); see also Quinn v. Robinson, 783 F.2d 776, 815 (9th Cir.1986) (“The magistrate does not weigh conflicting evidence and make factual determinations but, rather, determines only where there is competent evidence to support the belief that the accused has committed the charged offense.”).