context: P 7 Law enforcement officers have wide latitude to approach people and engage them in consensual conversation.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 501 U.S. 429, 437
citation_a.parenthetical: explaining no seizure occurs when police ask to examine identification
citation_a.sentence: See I.N.S. v. Delgado, 466 U.S. 210, 216, 218, 104 S.Ct. 1758, 80 L.Ed.2d 247 (1984) (holding law enforcement request for identification not tantamount to seizure; finding no constitutional violation when law enforcement conduct “consisted simply of questioning employees and arresting those they had probable cause to believe were unlawfully present”); see also Hiibel v. Sixth Judicial Dist. Court of Nev., Humboldt County., 542 U.S. 177, 188-89, 124 S.Ct. 2451,159 L.Ed.2d 292 (2004) (upholding state law requiring disclosure of identity to officers); Florida v. Bostick, 501 U.S. 429, 437, 111 S.Ct. 2382, 115 L.Ed.2d 389 (1991) (explaining no seizure occurs when police ask to examine identification).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 460 U.S. 491, 497
citation_b.parenthetical: holding officers do not violate Fourth Amendment by approaching citizen in public place and asking permission to question
citation_b.sentence: See Florida v. Royer, 460 U.S. 491, 497, 103 S.Ct. 1319, 75 L.Ed.2d 229 (1983) (holding officers do not violate Fourth Amendment by approaching citizen in public place and asking permission to question). They are also free to request identification.