context: Nor does the later introduction of the tape in evidence at the hearing transform the preparation of the tape into a prosecu-torial activity.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 55 F.3d 26, 29
citation_a.parenthetical: "The prosecutorial nature of an act does not spread backwards like an inkblot, immunizing everything it touches."
citation_a.sentence: See Guzman-Rivera v. Rivera-Cruz, 55 F.3d 26, 29 (1st Cir.1995) (“The prosecutorial nature of an act does not spread backwards like an inkblot, immunizing everything it touches.”); see also Buckley, 509 U.S. at 275-76, 113 S.Ct. 2606 (“That the prosecutors later called a grand jury to consider the evidence this work produced does not retroactively transform that work from administrative into the prosecutorial.”).
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.identifier: 509 U.S. 275, 275-76
citation_b.parenthetical: "That the prosecutors later called a grand jury to consider the evidence this work produced does not retroactively transform that work from administrative into the prosecutorial."
citation_b.sentence: See Guzman-Rivera v. Rivera-Cruz, 55 F.3d 26, 29 (1st Cir.1995) (“The prosecutorial nature of an act does not spread backwards like an inkblot, immunizing everything it touches.”); see also Buckley, 509 U.S. at 275-76, 113 S.Ct. 2606 (“That the prosecutors later called a grand jury to consider the evidence this work produced does not retroactively transform that work from administrative into the prosecutorial.”).