context: Under Home and earlier Supreme Court decisions, a motion to vacate, such as defendants have filed here, requires the Court to determine whether the "objective" of the court orders has been attained.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 2010 WL 1270202, at *11
citation_a.parenthetical: in addressing motion to vacate consent decree, "it is appropriate to consider whether the objectives of the decree have been achieved"
citation_a.sentence: Id.; Frew, 540 U.S. at 442, 124 S.Ct. 899 (“The federal court must exercise its equi table powers to ensure that when the objects of the decree have been attained, responsibility for discharging the State’s obligations is returned promptly to the State and its officials.”); see also LaShaim, 701 F.Supp.2d at 98, 2010 WL 1270202, at *11 (in addressing motion to vacate consent decree, “it is appropriate to consider whether the objectives of the decree have been achieved”).
citation_b.signal: no signal
citation_b.identifier: 540 U.S. 442, 442
citation_b.parenthetical: "The federal court must exercise its equi table powers to ensure that when the objects of the decree have been attained, responsibility for discharging the State's obligations is returned promptly to the State and its officials."
citation_b.sentence: Id.; Frew, 540 U.S. at 442, 124 S.Ct. 899 (“The federal court must exercise its equi table powers to ensure that when the objects of the decree have been attained, responsibility for discharging the State’s obligations is returned promptly to the State and its officials.”); see also LaShaim, 701 F.Supp.2d at 98, 2010 WL 1270202, at *11 (in addressing motion to vacate consent decree, “it is appropriate to consider whether the objectives of the decree have been achieved”).