context: . Although Plaintiff argues that his excessive force claim is governed by the Eighth Amendment, the district court properly analyzed Plaintiffs excessive-force claim as arising under the Fourth Amendment.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 972 F.2d 1566, 1571
citation_a.parenthetical: "[T]he Eighth Amendment applies only after a prisoner is convicted."
citation_a.sentence: See Jackson v. Sauls, 206 F.3d 1156, 1169 (11th Cir. 2000) (analyzing a claim of excessive force arising from ail arrest under the Fourth Amendment); see also United States v. Myers, 972 F.2d 1566, 1571 (11th Cir. 1992) ("[T]he Eighth Amendment applies only after a prisoner is convicted.”).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 206 F.3d 1156, 1169
citation_b.parenthetical: analyzing a claim of excessive force arising from ail arrest under the Fourth Amendment
citation_b.sentence: See Jackson v. Sauls, 206 F.3d 1156, 1169 (11th Cir. 2000) (analyzing a claim of excessive force arising from ail arrest under the Fourth Amendment); see also United States v. Myers, 972 F.2d 1566, 1571 (11th Cir. 1992) ("[T]he Eighth Amendment applies only after a prisoner is convicted.”).