context: But notice of the settlement agreement without more leaves Corn-erica's right to challenge the district court's damages determination unaffected. The Owner-Operators could bind Comeri-ca only through joining them as a party to the earlier litigation.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 495 F.3d 282, 286
citation_a.parenthetical: acknowledging that a non-party to a consent judgment "is entitled to its 'own day in court' to challenge actions taken under the judgments"
citation_a.sentence: See Martin v. Wilks, 490 U.S. 755, 765, 109 S.Ct. 2180, 104 L.Ed.2d 835 (1989) (“Joinder as a party, rather than knowledge of a lawsuit and an opportunity to intervene, is the method by which potential parties are subjected to the jurisdiction of the court and bound by a judgment or decree.”); see also City of Warren v. City of Detroit, 495 F.3d 282, 286 (6th Cir.2007) (acknowledging that a non-party to a consent judgment “is entitled to its ‘own day in court’ to challenge actions taken under the judgments”).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.parenthetical: "Joinder as a party, rather than knowledge of a lawsuit and an opportunity to intervene, is the method by which potential parties are subjected to the jurisdiction of the court and bound by a judgment or decree."
citation_b.sentence: See Martin v. Wilks, 490 U.S. 755, 765, 109 S.Ct. 2180, 104 L.Ed.2d 835 (1989) (“Joinder as a party, rather than knowledge of a lawsuit and an opportunity to intervene, is the method by which potential parties are subjected to the jurisdiction of the court and bound by a judgment or decree.”); see also City of Warren v. City of Detroit, 495 F.3d 282, 286 (6th Cir.2007) (acknowledging that a non-party to a consent judgment “is entitled to its ‘own day in court’ to challenge actions taken under the judgments”).