context: Notwithstanding the district court's error, such erroneous reasoning does not preclude us from affirming on different grounds that are supported in the record.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 36 F.3d 1028, 1041
citation_a.parenthetical: affirming the denial of a SS 2254 claim on different grounds than those relied upon by the district court
citation_a.sentence: See Spaziano v. Singletary, 36 F.3d 1028, 1041 (11th Cir.1994) (affirming the denial of a § 2254 claim on different grounds than those relied upon by the district court); see also Gay v. United States, 816 F.2d 614, 616 n. 1 (11th Cir.1987) (explaining that the principles developed in § 2254 cases also apply to § 2255 motions).
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.parenthetical: explaining that the principles developed in SS 2254 cases also apply to SS 2255 motions
citation_b.sentence: See Spaziano v. Singletary, 36 F.3d 1028, 1041 (11th Cir.1994) (affirming the denial of a § 2254 claim on different grounds than those relied upon by the district court); see also Gay v. United States, 816 F.2d 614, 616 n. 1 (11th Cir.1987) (explaining that the principles developed in § 2254 cases also apply to § 2255 motions).