context: Additionally, SBI simply does not assert that Department 710's physical environment permits different treatment of its employees based on their gender.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 433 U.S. 334, 334
citation_a.parenthetical: Title VII's bona fide occupational qualification exception is "extremely narrow"
citation_a.sentence: See United States v. Gregory, 818 F.2d 1114, 1117-18 (4th Cir.1987) (citation omitted) (employer has burden to prove that gender-based distinction is “reasonably necessary to the normal operation of that particular business”); see also Dothard, 433 U.S. at 334, 97 S.Ct. 2720 (Title VII’s bona fide occupational qualification exception is “extremely narrow”).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 818 F.2d 1114, 1117-18
citation_b.parenthetical: employer has burden to prove that gender-based distinction is "reasonably necessary to the normal operation of that particular business"
citation_b.sentence: See United States v. Gregory, 818 F.2d 1114, 1117-18 (4th Cir.1987) (citation omitted) (employer has burden to prove that gender-based distinction is “reasonably necessary to the normal operation of that particular business”); see also Dothard, 433 U.S. at 334, 97 S.Ct. 2720 (Title VII’s bona fide occupational qualification exception is “extremely narrow”).