context: On a motion to dismiss, courts may take judicial notice .of docket sheets and filings in other cases in determining when a claim accrued. See, e.g., Staehr v. Hartford Fin. Servs.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 471 F.3d 391, 398
citation_a.parenthetical: "docket sheets are public records of which the court could take judicial notice"
citation_a.sentence: Grp., 547 F.3d 406, 425 (2d Cir.2008) (stating that, on a motion to dismiss, “it is proper to take judicial notice of the fact that press coverage, prior lawsuits, or regulatory filings contained certain information, without regard to the truth of their contents” to determine when “inquiry notice” was triggered for statute of limitations purposes in a securities case); see also Mangiafico v. Blumenthal, 471 F.3d 391, 398 (2d Cir.2006) (“docket sheets are public records of which the court could take judicial notice”).
citation_b.signal: no signal
citation_b.identifier: 547 F.3d 406, 425
citation_b.parenthetical: stating that, on a motion to dismiss, "it is proper to take judicial notice of the fact that press coverage, prior lawsuits, or regulatory filings contained certain information, without regard to the truth of their contents" to determine when "inquiry notice" was triggered for statute of limitations purposes in a securities case
citation_b.sentence: Grp., 547 F.3d 406, 425 (2d Cir.2008) (stating that, on a motion to dismiss, “it is proper to take judicial notice of the fact that press coverage, prior lawsuits, or regulatory filings contained certain information, without regard to the truth of their contents” to determine when “inquiry notice” was triggered for statute of limitations purposes in a securities case); see also Mangiafico v. Blumenthal, 471 F.3d 391, 398 (2d Cir.2006) (“docket sheets are public records of which the court could take judicial notice”).