context: It can scarcely be argued that the Government builds streets, which are ordinarily traditional public fora, for the primary purpose of fostering First Amendment activities. At least, the Supreme Court does not think it can be.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.parenthetical: "Municipal authorities, as trustees for the public, have the duty to keep their communities' streets open and available for movement of people and property, the primary purpose to which the streets are dedicated,."
citation_a.sentence: See Schneider v. State, 308 U.S. 147, 160, 60 S.Ct. 146, 150, 84 L.Ed. 155 (1939) (“Municipal authorities, as trustees for the public, have the duty to keep their communities’ streets open and available for movement of people and property, the primary purpose to which the streets are dedicated,.”) (emphasis added); see also Wolin, 392 F.2d at 89 (acknowledging that Port Authority bus terminal is “designed for precisely the purpose of transit,” but nevertheless finding it to be a public forum).
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.identifier: 392 F.2d 89, 89
citation_b.parenthetical: acknowledging that Port Authority bus terminal is "designed for precisely the purpose of transit," but nevertheless finding it to be a public forum
citation_b.sentence: See Schneider v. State, 308 U.S. 147, 160, 60 S.Ct. 146, 150, 84 L.Ed. 155 (1939) (“Municipal authorities, as trustees for the public, have the duty to keep their communities’ streets open and available for movement of people and property, the primary purpose to which the streets are dedicated,.”) (emphasis added); see also Wolin, 392 F.2d at 89 (acknowledging that Port Authority bus terminal is “designed for precisely the purpose of transit,” but nevertheless finding it to be a public forum).