context: . The district court correctly reasoned that the finding of the state court jury of "recklessness" by the Diocese and the Archdiocese, for purpose of awarding punitive damages, is a separate and distinct issue from insurance coverage.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 858 F.Supp. 1417, 1417-19
citation_a.parenthetical: recklessness reflects degree of culpability -- such as an unreasonable' but slight risk of extreme harm -- rather than likelihood of occurrence
citation_a.sentence: See Diocese, 858 F.Supp. at 1417-19 (recklessness reflects degree of culpability — such as an unreasonable' but slight risk of extreme harm — rather than likelihood of occurrence); but cf. Ohio Casualty Ins. Co. v. Terrace Enters., Inc., 260 N.W.2d 450, 452-53 (Minn.1977) (suggesting in dicta that a reckless act may not constitute an occurrence).
citation_b.signal: but cf.
citation_b.identifier: 260 N.W.2d 450, 452-53
citation_b.parenthetical: suggesting in dicta that a reckless act may not constitute an occurrence
citation_b.sentence: See Diocese, 858 F.Supp. at 1417-19 (recklessness reflects degree of culpability — such as an unreasonable' but slight risk of extreme harm — rather than likelihood of occurrence); but cf. Ohio Casualty Ins. Co. v. Terrace Enters., Inc., 260 N.W.2d 450, 452-53 (Minn.1977) (suggesting in dicta that a reckless act may not constitute an occurrence).