context: . After Buckley, the court has considered various mitigating factors in determining an appropriate sanction where an attorney has improperly dealt with client funds.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 553 A.2d 206, 211-12
citation_a.parenthetical: alteration of credit card receipts submitted to law firm for reimbursement in violation of DR 1-102(A
citation_a.sentence: See In re Schneider, 553 A.2d 206, 211-12 (D.C.1989) (alteration of credit card receipts submitted to law firm for reimbursement in violation of DR 1-102(A)(4), 30-day suspension).
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.identifier: 549 A.2d 700, 716
citation_b.parenthetical: commingling and misappropriation through simple negligence in violation of DR 9-103(A
citation_b.sentence: See also In re Hessler, 549 A.2d 700, 716 (D.C.1988) (commingling and misappropriation through simple negligence in violation of DR 9-103(A), six-month suspension).