context: His eonclusory allegation without "specific, detailed facts" is not sufficient to demonstrate past persecution. Moreover, Yasmeen relied solely on Mirza's claims of persecution and did not provide any evidence that she had personally been harmed or detained in Pakistan; therefore, she cannot demonstrate past persecution.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.parenthetical: "[TJhere are no derivative beneficiaries for an application for withholding of removal."
citation_a.sentence: See Arif v. Mukasey, 509 F.3d 677, 681 n.15 (5th Cir. 2007) (“[TJhere are no derivative beneficiaries for an application for withholding of removal.”) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted); see also Majd, 446 F.3d at 595 (stating that an applicant cannot base her fear of persecution solely on general conditions of violence and civil unrest).
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.identifier: 446 F.3d 595, 595
citation_b.parenthetical: stating that an applicant cannot base her fear of persecution solely on general conditions of violence and civil unrest
citation_b.sentence: See Arif v. Mukasey, 509 F.3d 677, 681 n.15 (5th Cir. 2007) (“[TJhere are no derivative beneficiaries for an application for withholding of removal.”) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted); see also Majd, 446 F.3d at 595 (stating that an applicant cannot base her fear of persecution solely on general conditions of violence and civil unrest).