context: McGuire argued in his venue motion that the pretrial publicity was pervasive and unfairly prejudicial. He attached to his venue motion several articles concerning the accident and his criminal prosecution that had been published online and in print. However, he offered no evidence regarding the circulation of these materials.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 619 F.2d 1124, 1132
citation_a.parenthetical: failure to produce newspaper circulation statistics instrumental in court's rejection of appellant's pretrial publicity claims
citation_a.sentence: See Ryser, 453 S.W.3d at 35 (considering readership of newspapers containing relevant articles and viewership of news programs in evaluating pervasiveness of pretrial publicity); see also U.S. v. Ricardo, 619 F.2d 1124, 1132 (5th Cir.1980) (failure to produce newspaper circulation statistics instrumental in court’s rejection of appellant’s pretrial publicity claims).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 453 S.W.3d 35, 35
citation_b.parenthetical: considering readership of newspapers containing relevant articles and viewership of news programs in evaluating pervasiveness of pretrial publicity
citation_b.sentence: See Ryser, 453 S.W.3d at 35 (considering readership of newspapers containing relevant articles and viewership of news programs in evaluating pervasiveness of pretrial publicity); see also U.S. v. Ricardo, 619 F.2d 1124, 1132 (5th Cir.1980) (failure to produce newspaper circulation statistics instrumental in court’s rejection of appellant’s pretrial publicity claims).