context: The Second Circuit has held that Section 1981 claims brought pursuant to Section 1983 are analyzed under the same standard as Title VII claims.
citation_a.signal: no signal
citation_a.identifier: 609 F.3d 486, 491
citation_a.parenthetical: "Both Mr. Ruiz's Title VII Claims and his claims for race and national origin discrimination under Sections 1981 and 1983 are analyzed under the burden-shifting framework set forth in McDonnell Douglas ..."
citation_a.sentence: Ruiz v. County of Rockland, 609 F.3d 486, 491 (2d Cir. 2010) (“Both Mr. Ruiz’s Title VII Claims and his claims for race and national origin discrimination under Sections 1981 and 1983 are analyzed under the burden-shifting framework set forth in McDonnell Douglas ...”); see also Vargas v. Morgan Stanley, 438 Fed.Appx. 7, 9 n. 1 (2d Cir. 2011) (citing Ruiz); Patterson v. County of Oneida, 375 F.3d 206, 225 (2d Cir.2004) (“[T]he factors justifying summary judgment dismissing Patterson’s Title VII claim against the municipal defendants for termination of his employment equally support the summary dismissal of his claims for termination brought under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 and 1983”).
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.identifier: 375 F.3d 206, 225
citation_b.parenthetical: "[T]he factors justifying summary judgment dismissing Patterson's Title VII claim against the municipal defendants for termination of his employment equally support the summary dismissal of his claims for termination brought under 42 U.S.C. SSSS 1981 and 1983"
citation_b.sentence: Ruiz v. County of Rockland, 609 F.3d 486, 491 (2d Cir. 2010) (“Both Mr. Ruiz’s Title VII Claims and his claims for race and national origin discrimination under Sections 1981 and 1983 are analyzed under the burden-shifting framework set forth in McDonnell Douglas ...”); see also Vargas v. Morgan Stanley, 438 Fed.Appx. 7, 9 n. 1 (2d Cir. 2011) (citing Ruiz); Patterson v. County of Oneida, 375 F.3d 206, 225 (2d Cir.2004) (“[T]he factors justifying summary judgment dismissing Patterson’s Title VII claim against the municipal defendants for termination of his employment equally support the summary dismissal of his claims for termination brought under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981 and 1983”).