context: Appellant likewise presented no argument or evidence, either in the trial court or on appeal, regarding the racial composition of the entire venire, such that we- can consider whether the State used a disproportionate number of its strikes to challenge African-Americans relative to the number of African-Americans on the veni-re. Appellant also did not rebut the State's observations on the record concerning Prospective Juror No. 36's courtroom demeanor.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 414 S.W.3d 767, 767
citation_a.parenthetical: "[A] prospective juror's demeanor may be 'considered proved on the record' if the prosecutor recites his observation of that demeanor for the record and defense counsel fails to 'rebut the observation.' "
citation_a.sentence: See Nieto v. State, 365 S.W.3d 673, 680 (Tex. Crim.App.2012) (“We have held that the demeanor of a potential juror is a valid reason to exercise a peremptory strike.”); see also Blackman, 414 S.W.3d at 767 (“[A] prospective juror’s demeanor may be ‘considered proved on the record’ if the prosecutor recites his observation of that demeanor for the record and defense counsel fails to ‘rebut the observation.’ ”).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 365 S.W.3d 673, 680
citation_b.parenthetical: "We have held that the demeanor of a potential juror is a valid reason to exercise a peremptory strike."
citation_b.sentence: See Nieto v. State, 365 S.W.3d 673, 680 (Tex. Crim.App.2012) (“We have held that the demeanor of a potential juror is a valid reason to exercise a peremptory strike.”); see also Blackman, 414 S.W.3d at 767 (“[A] prospective juror’s demeanor may be ‘considered proved on the record’ if the prosecutor recites his observation of that demeanor for the record and defense counsel fails to ‘rebut the observation.’ ”).