context: A defendant's making a profit does not preclude its receiving First Amendment protection.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 332 F.3d 924, 924
citation_a.parenthetical: "Speech is protected even though it is carried in a form that is sold for profit."
citation_a.sentence: See also ETW, 332 F.3d at 924 (“Speech is protected even though it is carried in a form that is sold for profit.”) (citations omitted) and (“The fact that expressive materials are sold does not diminish the degree of protection to which they are entitled under the First Amendment”) (citing City of Lakewood v. Plain Dealer Publ’g Co., 486 U.S. 750, 756 n. 5,108 S.Ct. 2138, 100 L.Ed.2d 771 (1988)).
citation_b.signal: no signal
citation_b.parenthetical: " 'That books, newspapers, and magazines are published and sold for profit does not prevent them from being a form of expression whose liberty is safeguarded by the First Amendment.' "
citation_b.sentence: Time Inc. v. Hill, 385 U.S. 374, 396-97, 87 S.Ct. 534, 17 L.Ed.2d 456 (1967) (“ ‘That books, newspapers, and magazines are published and sold for profit does not prevent them from being a form of expression whose liberty is safeguarded by the First Amendment.’ ”) (citations omitted).