context: Rather, the primary remedy sought by the named Plaintiffs is purely monetary, as is confirmed by the deposition testimony of Christian, wherein she definitively states that her primary interest in this case is recouping her expenses.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 211 F.R.D. 573, 599-600
citation_a.parenthetical: finding the compensatory damages requested by the named plaintiffs more than "incidental" when they had to be "assessed based on the individual circumstances of the class representative's work history and personal injury" and therefore would require "individualized analysis of each class member's circumstances"
citation_a.sentence: See Avritt, 615 F.3d at 1035-36 (affirming the district court’s denial of class certification under Rule 23(b)(2) when the primary remedy sought by the plaintiffs was monetary, not injunctive relief); see also Clayborne v. Omaha Pub. Power Dist., 211 F.R.D. 573, 599-600 (D.Neb.2002) (finding the compensatory damages requested by the named plaintiffs more than “incidental” when they had to be “assessed based on the individual circumstances of the class representative’s work history and personal injury” and therefore would require “individualized analysis of each class member’s circumstances”).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 615 F.3d 1035, 1035-36
citation_b.parenthetical: affirming the district court's denial of class certification under Rule 23(b)(2) when the primary remedy sought by the plaintiffs was monetary, not injunctive relief
citation_b.sentence: See Avritt, 615 F.3d at 1035-36 (affirming the district court’s denial of class certification under Rule 23(b)(2) when the primary remedy sought by the plaintiffs was monetary, not injunctive relief); see also Clayborne v. Omaha Pub. Power Dist., 211 F.R.D. 573, 599-600 (D.Neb.2002) (finding the compensatory damages requested by the named plaintiffs more than “incidental” when they had to be “assessed based on the individual circumstances of the class representative’s work history and personal injury” and therefore would require “individualized analysis of each class member’s circumstances”).