context: CDN may eventually be entitled to a return of excess or unclaimed funds. See Six Mex.
citation_a.signal: cf.
citation_a.identifier: 129 F.3d 1026, 1027
citation_a.parenthetical: assuming that when absent class members do not have a calculable interest in unclaimed money, the balance of a fund is returned to defendants
citation_a.sentence: Workers v. Ariz. Citrus Growers, 904 F.2d 1301, 1308 (9th Cir.1990) (“Reversion to the defendant may be appropriate when deterrence is not a goal of the statute or is not required by the circumstances.”); cf. Williams v. MGM-Pathe Commc’ns Co., 129 F.3d 1026, 1027 (9th Cir.1997) (per curiam) (assuming that when absent class members do not have a calculable interest in unclaimed money, the balance of a fund is returned to defendants). The district court, however, has entered an order providing that it will await the running of the statute of limitations on the filing of individual suits against CDN before calculating any distribution of excess and unclaimed funds.
citation_b.signal: no signal
citation_b.identifier: 904 F.2d 1301, 1308
citation_b.parenthetical: "Reversion to the defendant may be appropriate when deterrence is not a goal of the statute or is not required by the circumstances."
citation_b.sentence: Workers v. Ariz. Citrus Growers, 904 F.2d 1301, 1308 (9th Cir.1990) (“Reversion to the defendant may be appropriate when deterrence is not a goal of the statute or is not required by the circumstances.”); cf. Williams v. MGM-Pathe Commc’ns Co., 129 F.3d 1026, 1027 (9th Cir.1997) (per curiam) (assuming that when absent class members do not have a calculable interest in unclaimed money, the balance of a fund is returned to defendants). The district court, however, has entered an order providing that it will await the running of the statute of limitations on the filing of individual suits against CDN before calculating any distribution of excess and unclaimed funds.