context: Only if the record, viewed in that manner and without regard to credibility determinations, reveals no genuine issue as to any material fact may the court enter summary judgment." However, summary judgment is inappropriate where there are issues of motive and intent as related to the material facts.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 202 F.3d 424, 433
citation_a.parenthetical: finding that "determinations of motive and intent ... are questions better suited for the jury"
citation_a.sentence: See Poller v. Columbia Broad. Sys., 368 U.S. 464, 473, 82 S.Ct. 486, 7 L.Ed.2d 458 (1962)(summary judgment is to be issued “sparingly” in litigation “where motive and intent play leading roles”); see also Dominguez-Cruz v. Suttle Caribe, Inc., 202 F.3d 424, 433 (1st Cir. 2000)(finding that “determinations of motive and intent ... are questions better suited for the jury”).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 368 U.S. 464, 473
citation_b.parenthetical: summary judgment is to be issued "sparingly" in litigation "where motive and intent play leading roles"
citation_b.sentence: See Poller v. Columbia Broad. Sys., 368 U.S. 464, 473, 82 S.Ct. 486, 7 L.Ed.2d 458 (1962)(summary judgment is to be issued “sparingly” in litigation “where motive and intent play leading roles”); see also Dominguez-Cruz v. Suttle Caribe, Inc., 202 F.3d 424, 433 (1st Cir. 2000)(finding that “determinations of motive and intent ... are questions better suited for the jury”).