context: The court held that the plaintiffs amended complaint, filed after her appointment as administratrix, would relate back to the original filing date. See E.R.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 93 F.3d 781, 790
citation_a.parenthetical: permitting relation back of statutory claim which initially lacked sufficient allegation of unreimbursed expenses
citation_a.sentence: Hakusan II, 954 F.2d 874, 886-87 (3d Cir.1992) (allowing omission of a non-diverse defendant and allowing relation back to original filing); see also Black v. Sec’y of Health and Human Sens., 93 F.3d 781, 790 (Fed.Cir.1996) (permitting relation back of statutory claim which initially lacked sufficient allegation of unreimbursed expenses).
citation_b.signal: no signal
citation_b.identifier: 954 F.2d 874, 886-87
citation_b.parenthetical: allowing omission of a non-diverse defendant and allowing relation back to original filing
citation_b.sentence: Hakusan II, 954 F.2d 874, 886-87 (3d Cir.1992) (allowing omission of a non-diverse defendant and allowing relation back to original filing); see also Black v. Sec’y of Health and Human Sens., 93 F.3d 781, 790 (Fed.Cir.1996) (permitting relation back of statutory claim which initially lacked sufficient allegation of unreimbursed expenses).