context: A series of misclassified entries was each determined by Customs to be a separate violation of section 1641(b)(4) in light of the totality of the circumstances addressed in this opinion. Moreover, it is doubtful that the doctrine of multiplicity is applicable to civil or administrative matters.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 522 U.S. 93, 99
citation_a.parenthetical: 'The Clause protects only against the imposition of multiple criminal punishments for the same offense."
citation_a.sentence: See Hudson v. United States, 522 U.S. 93, 99 (1997) (‘The Clause protects only against the imposition of multiple criminal punishments for the same offense.”) (emphasis in origianl); see also United States ex rel. Marcus v. Hess, 317 U.S. 537, 548-49 (1943) (“Only [criminal punishment] subject[s] the defendant to ‘jeopard/ within the constitutional meaning”).
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.identifier: 317 U.S. 537, 548-49
citation_b.parenthetical: "Only [criminal punishment] subject[s] the defendant to 'jeopard/ within the constitutional meaning"
citation_b.sentence: See Hudson v. United States, 522 U.S. 93, 99 (1997) (‘The Clause protects only against the imposition of multiple criminal punishments for the same offense.”) (emphasis in origianl); see also United States ex rel. Marcus v. Hess, 317 U.S. 537, 548-49 (1943) (“Only [criminal punishment] subject[s] the defendant to ‘jeopard/ within the constitutional meaning”).