context: However, the burden is upon the appellant to furnish sufficient evidence to the trial court and to designate a record sufficient to present her points to the appellate court to establish the claimed error.
citation_a.signal: but see
citation_a.identifier: 126 Wis. 383, 383
citation_a.parenthetical: trial court must evaluate and include the pension interest in the property division whether or not the parties present evidence on its value
citation_a.sentence: See Beaty v. Beaty, 167 Mich. App. 553, 557, 423 N.W.2d 262 (1988) (a husband’s non-contributory pension does not have to be divided in the absence of any showing by the wife as to its present value); Miller v. Miller, 83 Mich. App. 672, 675, 269 N.W.2d 264, 266 (1978) (party seeking to include pension interest in marital estate for purposes of distribution in divorce proceedings bears burden of proving reasonably ascertainable value, and if burden is not met, interest should not be considered as asset subject to distribution); but see, In re Marriage of Steinke v. Steinke, 126 Wis. at 383 (trial court must evaluate and include the pension interest in the property division whether or not the parties present evidence on its value).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 269 N.W.2d 264, 266
citation_b.parenthetical: party seeking to include pension interest in marital estate for purposes of distribution in divorce proceedings bears burden of proving reasonably ascertainable value, and if burden is not met, interest should not be considered as asset subject to distribution
citation_b.sentence: See Beaty v. Beaty, 167 Mich. App. 553, 557, 423 N.W.2d 262 (1988) (a husband’s non-contributory pension does not have to be divided in the absence of any showing by the wife as to its present value); Miller v. Miller, 83 Mich. App. 672, 675, 269 N.W.2d 264, 266 (1978) (party seeking to include pension interest in marital estate for purposes of distribution in divorce proceedings bears burden of proving reasonably ascertainable value, and if burden is not met, interest should not be considered as asset subject to distribution); but see, In re Marriage of Steinke v. Steinke, 126 Wis. at 383 (trial court must evaluate and include the pension interest in the property division whether or not the parties present evidence on its value).