context: Next, we decline to consider his ineffective-assistance claims on direct appeal. Further, after careful de novo review, we enforce the appeal waiver as to the remaining challenges to Valencia-Mata's sentence.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 333 F.3d 886, 889-92
citation_a.parenthetical: court should enforce appeal waiver and dismiss appeal where it falls within scope of waiver, plea agreement and waiver were entered into knowingly and voluntarily, and no miscarriage of justice would result
citation_a.sentence: See United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir.2003) (en banc) (court should enforce appeal waiver and dismiss appeal where it falls within scope of waiver, plea agreement and waiver were entered into knowingly and voluntarily, and no miscarriage of justice would result); see also United States v. Scott, 627 F.3d 702, 704 (8th Cir.2010) (de novo review of validity and applicability of appeal waiver).
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.identifier: 627 F.3d 702, 704
citation_b.parenthetical: de novo review of validity and applicability of appeal waiver
citation_b.sentence: See United States v. Andis, 333 F.3d 886, 889-92 (8th Cir.2003) (en banc) (court should enforce appeal waiver and dismiss appeal where it falls within scope of waiver, plea agreement and waiver were entered into knowingly and voluntarily, and no miscarriage of justice would result); see also United States v. Scott, 627 F.3d 702, 704 (8th Cir.2010) (de novo review of validity and applicability of appeal waiver).