context: The Sixth Amendment right to a trial by jury requires "criminal convie-tions to rest upon a jury determination that the defendant is guilty of every element of the erime with which he is charged, beyond a reasonable doubt." However, a judgment of NGRI does not constitute a conviction; rather, it operates as an acquittal of the charged offenses.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 869 P.2d 207, 209
citation_a.parenthetical: stating that a person committed after a finding of insanity "will not actually have been convicted of the crime charged"
citation_a.sentence: See Jacobs v. Carmel, 869 P.2d 207, 209 (Colo.1994) (stating that a person committed after a finding of insanity "will not actually have been convicted of the crime charged"); see also Parks v. Dist. Court, 180 Colo. 202, 503 P.2d 1029, 1033 (1972) (holding that insanity is "a complete defense to the criminal charge").
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.parenthetical: holding that insanity is "a complete defense to the criminal charge"
citation_b.sentence: See Jacobs v. Carmel, 869 P.2d 207, 209 (Colo.1994) (stating that a person committed after a finding of insanity "will not actually have been convicted of the crime charged"); see also Parks v. Dist. Court, 180 Colo. 202, 503 P.2d 1029, 1033 (1972) (holding that insanity is "a complete defense to the criminal charge").