context: Plaintiffs request that the court reconsider the business relationships that existed between the various parties and find that in light of these business relationships, the constructive ordering doctrine "should be applied through the entire communications path of the traffic, not just isolated segments of the path." As the court explained in the summary judgment order, because plaintiffs seek to recover access charges owed pursuant to their tariffs, the relevant question is whether plaintiffs provided each defendant with access services pursuant to their tariffs.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 83 F.3d 549, 552
citation_a.parenthetical: setting out terms of relevant tariff in determining whether defendant was obligated to pay charges under the tariff
citation_a.sentence: See Advamtel LLC v. AT & T Corp., 118 F.Supp.2d 680, 683 (E.D.Va.2000) (explaining that to recover for amounts charged pursuant to their tariffs, plaintiffs must show that they operated under a valid tariff and that they provided services to the customer pursuant to that tariff); see also American Tel. & Tel. Co. v. City of New York, 83 F.3d 549, 552 (2d Cir.1996) (setting out terms of relevant tariff in determining whether defendant was obligated to pay charges under the tariff).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 118 F.Supp.2d 680, 683
citation_b.parenthetical: explaining that to recover for amounts charged pursuant to their tariffs, plaintiffs must show that they operated under a valid tariff and that they provided services to the customer pursuant to that tariff
citation_b.sentence: See Advamtel LLC v. AT & T Corp., 118 F.Supp.2d 680, 683 (E.D.Va.2000) (explaining that to recover for amounts charged pursuant to their tariffs, plaintiffs must show that they operated under a valid tariff and that they provided services to the customer pursuant to that tariff); see also American Tel. & Tel. Co. v. City of New York, 83 F.3d 549, 552 (2d Cir.1996) (setting out terms of relevant tariff in determining whether defendant was obligated to pay charges under the tariff).