context: In part, this concern over proper or genuine identity is borne out in the close attention courts have given to cases of forgery. They consistently have defined those activities which involved misrepresentation of identity as within the scope of SS 2314. For example, the use of a fictitious name as drawer of a check on a company account has given rise to a "forgery" under the statute when coupled with fraudulent intent.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.parenthetical: use of name other than that of actual person involved in transaction is ground for conviction
citation_a.sentence: See also United States v. Huntley, 535 F.2d 1400 (5 Cir.1976) (en banc), cert. denied, 430 U.S. 929 (1977) (use of name other than that of actual person involved in transaction is ground for conviction); United States v. Metcalf, 388 F.2d 440 (4 Cir.1968) (check on individual account opened in fictitious name).
citation_b.signal: cf.
citation_b.parenthetical: an otherwise valid security, but with a forged endorsement is not a "falsely made security"
citation_b.sentence: Cf. United States v. Tyson, 690 F.2d 9 (1 Cir.1982) (an otherwise valid security, but with a forged endorsement is not a “falsely made security”).