context: The Debtor alleges the court erred in denying discharge under section 727(a)(4)(A) because undervaluation of an asset is an insufficient basis for denying discharge.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 114 B.R. 794, 797
citation_a.parenthetical: Undervaluation of assets which are otherwise properly listed in a debtor's schedules is not sufficient to warrant a denial of discharge
citation_a.sentence: See also In re Wines, 114 B.R. 794, 797 (Bankr.S.D.Fla.1990)(Undervaluation of assets which are otherwise properly listed in a debtor’s schedules is not sufficient to warrant a denial of discharge). This argument is not applicable to the facts of this case.
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 41 B.R. 816, 819
citation_b.parenthetical: Failure of the debtor to properly value two automobiles on his schedules was an insufficient ground for discharge since the automobiles were disclosed on debt- or's schedules to the Trustee who was afforded an opportunity to make an independent appraisal of their value
citation_b.sentence: See In re Blum, 41 B.R. 816, 819 (Bankr.S.D.Fla.1984)(Failure of the debtor to properly value two automobiles on his schedules was an insufficient ground for discharge since the automobiles were disclosed on debt- or’s schedules to the Trustee who was afforded an opportunity to make an independent appraisal of their value).