context: The plaintiffs' representative received either a copy of the motion presented at the board meeting or a draft copy of the Notice of Action the day after the decision was rendered and thus was able to discern the reasons for the board's denial. The motion contained the reasons for the denial of the site plan application, and the draft Notice of Action also contained reasons for the board's decision.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 133 N.H. 290, 290
citation_a.parenthetical: statute satisfied because plaintiff well aware of primary reasons for denial of plan
citation_a.sentence: See K & P, Inc., 133 N.H. at 290, 575 A.2d at 808 (statute satisfied because plaintiff well aware of primary reasons for denial of plan). Lack of a final version of the reasons for the board’s decision, which was not statutorily required as of the time the decision was rendered, did not divest the plaintiffs of the ability to file their appeal timely.
citation_b.signal: cf.
citation_b.identifier: 109 N.H. 176, 176
citation_b.parenthetical: temporary unavailability of minutes did not relieve plaintiffs of necessity of stating ground for their motion for rehearing
citation_b.sentence: Cf. DiPietro, 109 N.H. at 176, 246 A.2d at 696 (temporary unavailability of minutes did not relieve plaintiffs of necessity of stating ground for their motion for rehearing).