context: The IJ correctly determined that RosasLeon's 2004 conviction for violating Cal.Penal Code SS 273.5 is an aggravated felony crime of violence under 8 U.S.C. SS 1101(a)(43)(F), where he was sentenced to a term of imprisonment of one year.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 611 F.3d 1080, 1083
citation_a.parenthetical: a conviction under Cal.Penal Code SS 273.5 is categorically a crime of violence under 18 U.S.C. SS 16(a
citation_a.sentence: See Banuelos-Ayon v. Holder, 611 F.3d 1080, 1083 (9th Cir.2010) (a conviction under Cal.Penal Code § 273.5 is categorically a crime of violence under 18 U.S.C. § 16(a)); see also Renteria-Morales v. Mukasey, 551 F.3d 1076, 1083 (9th Cir. 2008) (“[W]e do not use the categorical and modified categorical approach to determine whether a petitioner has met any sentencing requirement specified in § 1101(a)(43).”). The IJ therefore did not err in concluding that Rosas-Leon was statutorily ineligible for cancellation of removal. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(a)(3).
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.identifier: 551 F.3d 1076, 1083
citation_b.parenthetical: "[W]e do not use the categorical and modified categorical approach to determine whether a petitioner has met any sentencing requirement specified in SS 1101(a)(43)."
citation_b.sentence: See Banuelos-Ayon v. Holder, 611 F.3d 1080, 1083 (9th Cir.2010) (a conviction under Cal.Penal Code § 273.5 is categorically a crime of violence under 18 U.S.C. § 16(a)); see also Renteria-Morales v. Mukasey, 551 F.3d 1076, 1083 (9th Cir. 2008) (“[W]e do not use the categorical and modified categorical approach to determine whether a petitioner has met any sentencing requirement specified in § 1101(a)(43).”). The IJ therefore did not err in concluding that Rosas-Leon was statutorily ineligible for cancellation of removal. See 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(a)(3).