context: . We note that several federal appellate courts have assumed that Batson has applicability to racial or ethnic groups other than black Americans.
citation_a.signal: cf.
citation_a.identifier: 822 F.2d 214, 227
citation_a.parenthetical: under the Sixth Amendment, whites are a cognizable group for Batson analysis
citation_a.sentence: Cf. Roman v. Abrams, 822 F.2d 214, 227 (2d Cir.1987) (under the Sixth Amendment, whites are a cognizable group for Batson analysis), petition for cert. filed, (U.S. Dec. 12, 1987) (No. 87-6031).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 812 F.2d 1302, 1313-14
citation_b.parenthetical: applying Batson to a challenge that Native Americans were improperly excluded from jury service
citation_b.sentence: See e.g., United States v. Alcantar, 832 F.2d 1175, 1180 (9th Cir.1987) (applying Batson to a challenge that Hispanic-Americans were improperly excluded from jury service); United States v. Chalan, 812 F.2d 1302, 1313-14 (10th Cir.1987) (applying Batson to a challenge that Native Americans were improperly excluded from jury service).