context: None of this evidence rebuts the fact that since at least 1988, DAD's written policy has been that limited duty assignments are temporary. That the DAD may have been lax in enforcing this policy does not change that fact.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 884 F.Supp. 999, 999-1000
citation_a.parenthetical: plaintiffs' 16-year light duty assignment did not convert temporary assignment into permanent one
citation_a.sentence: See Champ, 884 F.Supp. at 999-1000 (plaintiffs’ 16-year light duty assignment did not convert temporary assignment into permanent one); see also Gaither v. Anne Arundel County, 94 Md.App. 569, 618 A.2d 244 (1993) (fact that county permitted employee to work light duty for 10 years did not create duty to continue practice).
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.parenthetical: fact that county permitted employee to work light duty for 10 years did not create duty to continue practice
citation_b.sentence: See Champ, 884 F.Supp. at 999-1000 (plaintiffs’ 16-year light duty assignment did not convert temporary assignment into permanent one); see also Gaither v. Anne Arundel County, 94 Md.App. 569, 618 A.2d 244 (1993) (fact that county permitted employee to work light duty for 10 years did not create duty to continue practice).