context: Because Gutierrez did not demonstrate prejudice before the BIA, the BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying his motion to reopen based on the record before it.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 593 F.3d 1025, 1030
citation_a.parenthetical: approving reliance on an alien's admission that he had been convicted of a controlled substance offense in denying application for adjustment of status
citation_a.sentence: See Ortiz v. INS, 179 F.3d 1148, 1153 (9th Cir.1999) (no prejudice where petitioner failed to describe the evidence that his counsel incompetently failed to introduce); see also Esquivel-Garcia v. Holder, 593 F.3d 1025, 1030 (9th Cir.2010) (approving reliance on an alien’s admission that he had been convicted of a controlled substance offense in denying application for adjustment of status).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 179 F.3d 1148, 1153
citation_b.parenthetical: no prejudice where petitioner failed to describe the evidence that his counsel incompetently failed to introduce
citation_b.sentence: See Ortiz v. INS, 179 F.3d 1148, 1153 (9th Cir.1999) (no prejudice where petitioner failed to describe the evidence that his counsel incompetently failed to introduce); see also Esquivel-Garcia v. Holder, 593 F.3d 1025, 1030 (9th Cir.2010) (approving reliance on an alien’s admission that he had been convicted of a controlled substance offense in denying application for adjustment of status).