context: Id Even when there is direct evidence of premeditation, the state must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that petitioner calmly deliberated or reflected on the decision to kill prior to the actual act of killing to support this aggravating factor. Our cases make clear that this aggravating factor does not apply where the evidence reasonably is susceptible to some other conclusion than that the murder was accomplished in a calculated manner or where there simply is no evidence as to the defendant's state of mind prior to the killing.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 456 So.2d 444, 445-47
citation_a.parenthetical: no evidence to set murder apart from usual holdup murder
citation_a.sentence: See Thompson v. State, 456 So.2d 444, 445-47 (Fla.1984) (no evidence to set murder apart from usual holdup murder).
citation_b.signal: no signal
citation_b.identifier: 442 So.2d 200, 202
citation_b.parenthetical: murder that occurred during burglary and robbery is susceptible to other conclusions than finding it was committed in cold, calculated, and premeditated manner
citation_b.sentence: Peavy v. State, 442 So.2d 200, 202 (Fla.1983) (murder that occurred during burglary and robbery is susceptible to other conclusions than finding it was committed in cold, calculated, and premeditated manner).