context: However, if the general employer and special employer have entered into a contract assigning liability to one of the parties, courts will give effect to that contract.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 530 F.Supp. 550, 563
citation_a.parenthetical: "[U]nder Maryland law, whatever the status of an employee under the 'borrowed servant' doctrine, the parties may allocate between themselves the risk of any loss resulting from the employee's negligent acts."
citation_a.sentence: See Temp. Staffing, 765 A.2d at 611 (directing workers’ compensation commission to consider contract between co-employers when assigning liability for benefits, for injured employee); Hercules Powder Co. v. Harry T. Campbell Sons Co., 156 Md. 346, 144 A. 510, 518 (1929) (reversing jury verdict in favor of special employer where contract between general and special employer assigned liability for employee’s negligence to special employer); see also Sea Land Indus., Inc. v. Gen. Ship Repair Corp., 530 F.Supp. 550, 563 (D. Md. 1982) (“[U]nder Maryland law, whatever the status of an employee under the ‘borrowed servant’ doctrine, the parties may allocate between themselves the risk of any loss resulting from the employee’s negligent acts.”).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 765 A.2d 611, 611
citation_b.parenthetical: directing workers' compensation commission to consider contract between co-employers when assigning liability for benefits, for injured employee
citation_b.sentence: See Temp. Staffing, 765 A.2d at 611 (directing workers’ compensation commission to consider contract between co-employers when assigning liability for benefits, for injured employee); Hercules Powder Co. v. Harry T. Campbell Sons Co., 156 Md. 346, 144 A. 510, 518 (1929) (reversing jury verdict in favor of special employer where contract between general and special employer assigned liability for employee’s negligence to special employer); see also Sea Land Indus., Inc. v. Gen. Ship Repair Corp., 530 F.Supp. 550, 563 (D. Md. 1982) (“[U]nder Maryland law, whatever the status of an employee under the ‘borrowed servant’ doctrine, the parties may allocate between themselves the risk of any loss resulting from the employee’s negligent acts.”).