context: The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Anaya Morales' motion to remand because he failed to show he was prejudiced by his counsels' performance.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 339 F.3d 814, 826-28
citation_a.parenthetical: no prejudice where motion failed to present plausible grounds for relief
citation_a.sentence: See Rojas-Garcia v. Ashcroft, 339 F.3d 814, 826-28 (9th Cir.2003) (no prejudice where motion failed to present plausible grounds for relief); see also Zetino, 622 F.3d at 1016 (“An alien’s desire to be free from harassment by criminals motivated by theft or random violence by gang members bears no nexus to a protected ground.”); Delgado-Ortiz v. Holder, 600 F.3d 1148, 1151-52 (9th Cir.2010).
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.identifier: 622 F.3d 1016, 1016
citation_b.parenthetical: "An alien's desire to be free from harassment by criminals motivated by theft or random violence by gang members bears no nexus to a protected ground."
citation_b.sentence: See Rojas-Garcia v. Ashcroft, 339 F.3d 814, 826-28 (9th Cir.2003) (no prejudice where motion failed to present plausible grounds for relief); see also Zetino, 622 F.3d at 1016 (“An alien’s desire to be free from harassment by criminals motivated by theft or random violence by gang members bears no nexus to a protected ground.”); Delgado-Ortiz v. Holder, 600 F.3d 1148, 1151-52 (9th Cir.2010).