context: Therefore, Fuller controls the disposition of this case. Appellant lacks standing to complain about the seizure of the cocaine because Cox did not obtain the cocaine in violation of appellant's rights.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 829 S.W.2d 201, 201-02
citation_a.parenthetical: one who has not suffered invasion of a legal right does not have standing to bring suit
citation_a.sentence: See Fuller, 829 S.W.2d at 201-02 (one who has not suffered invasion of a legal right does not have standing to bring suit); cf. House v. State, 947 S.W.2d 251, 253 (Tex.Cr.App.1997) (defendant has no standing to complain about prosecutor’s alleged ethical rule violation that does not violate or prejudice the defendant’s rights).
citation_b.signal: cf.
citation_b.identifier: 947 S.W.2d 251, 253
citation_b.parenthetical: defendant has no standing to complain about prosecutor's alleged ethical rule violation that does not violate or prejudice the defendant's rights
citation_b.sentence: See Fuller, 829 S.W.2d at 201-02 (one who has not suffered invasion of a legal right does not have standing to bring suit); cf. House v. State, 947 S.W.2d 251, 253 (Tex.Cr.App.1997) (defendant has no standing to complain about prosecutor’s alleged ethical rule violation that does not violate or prejudice the defendant’s rights).