context: We also reject Singh's contention that the BIA did not adequately consider his evidence.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 597 F.3d 983, 990
citation_a.parenthetical: the BIA "does not have to write an exegesis on every contention"
citation_a.sentence: See Fernandez v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 592, 603 (9th Cir.2006) (finding petitioner had not overcome the presumption that the BIA reviewed the record); see also Najmabadi v. Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 990 (9th Cir.2010) (the BIA “does not have to write an exegesis on every contention”).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 439 F.3d 592, 603
citation_b.parenthetical: finding petitioner had not overcome the presumption that the BIA reviewed the record
citation_b.sentence: See Fernandez v. Gonzales, 439 F.3d 592, 603 (9th Cir.2006) (finding petitioner had not overcome the presumption that the BIA reviewed the record); see also Najmabadi v. Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 990 (9th Cir.2010) (the BIA “does not have to write an exegesis on every contention”).