context: Further, because Marshall has failed to identify a knowing violation of clearly established due process rights, as defined by Indiana law or the Seventh Circuit, the individual Defendants are also entitled to qualified immunity against Marshall's due process claims.
citation_a.signal: but see
citation_a.parenthetical: holding that the Saucier test is not mandatory, particularly at the pleading stage, where facts must first be developed to determine whether a constitutional right was violate
citation_a.sentence: See Saucier v. Katz, 533 U.S. 194, 236, 121 S.Ct. 2151, 150 L.Ed.2d 272 (2001) (holding that government officials receive qualified immunity unless: their conduct violated a constitutional right, and the law to this effect was “clearly established” under then-existing law such that a reasonable official would have known that his behavior was unlawful); but see Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. 223, 226, 238-39, 129 S.Ct. 808, 172 L.Ed.2d 565 (2009) (holding that the Saucier test is not mandatory, particularly at the pleading stage, where facts must first be developed to determine whether a constitutional right was violate).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.parenthetical: holding that government officials receive qualified immunity unless: their conduct violated a constitutional right, and the law to this effect was "clearly established" under then-existing law such that a reasonable official would have known that his behavior was unlawful
citation_b.sentence: See Saucier v. Katz, 533 U.S. 194, 236, 121 S.Ct. 2151, 150 L.Ed.2d 272 (2001) (holding that government officials receive qualified immunity unless: their conduct violated a constitutional right, and the law to this effect was “clearly established” under then-existing law such that a reasonable official would have known that his behavior was unlawful); but see Pearson v. Callahan, 555 U.S. 223, 226, 238-39, 129 S.Ct. 808, 172 L.Ed.2d 565 (2009) (holding that the Saucier test is not mandatory, particularly at the pleading stage, where facts must first be developed to determine whether a constitutional right was violate).