context: P 11 On appeal, we presume the trial court exercised its discretion by considering all the relevant factors to determine whether to forfeit the entire bond amount or only a portion thereof.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 97 P.3d 876, 883
citation_a.parenthetical: appellate court presumes trial court knows law and applied correct standard unless presumption rebutted by record
citation_a.sentence: See Fuentes v. Fuentes, 209 Ariz. 51, ¶ 32, 97 P.3d 876, 883 (App.2004) (appellate court presumes trial court knows law and applied correct standard unless presumption rebutted by record). And we do not re-weigh those factors to determine whether we would reach the same decision as the trial court.
citation_b.signal: cf.
citation_b.identifier: 132 Ariz. 35, 37
citation_b.parenthetical: difference in judicial opinion not synonymous with abuse of discretion
citation_b.sentence: Cf. State v. Mincey, 141 Ariz. 425, 432, 687 P.2d 1180, 1187 (1984); Quigley v. City Court, 132 Ariz. 35, 37, 643 P.2d 738, 740 (App.1982) (difference in judicial opinion not synonymous with abuse of discretion).