context: A government need not produce all evidence necessary to ensure a conviction in order to obtain extradition. Thus, while Respondent identifies arguments that may help him at trial, he does not undermine the evidence establishing probable cause to believe that he is the person who killed the victim.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 180 Fed.Appx. 522, 522
citation_a.parenthetical: upholding district court's finding of probable cause even though there was no eyewitness identifying respondent as the shooter, but there was circumstantial evidence including that respondent had "quarreled with the victim and brandished a gun at him a few hours prior to the shooting" and that respondent was in Reynosa, Tamaulipas, Mexico the night of the murder
citation_a.sentence: Salazar, 2010 WL 2925444, at *11 (stating that the Mexican government’s failure to interview potential witnesses or to provide the Court with all witness statements did not undermine the evidence establishing probable cause); see also Garza, 180 Fed.Appx. at 522 (upholding district court’s finding of probable cause even though there was no eyewitness identifying respondent as the shooter, but there was circumstantial evidence including that respondent had “quarreled with the victim and brandished a gun at him a few hours prior to the shooting” and that respondent was in Reynosa, Tamaulipas, Mexico the night of the murder).
citation_b.signal: no signal
citation_b.identifier: 2010 WL 2925444, at *11
citation_b.parenthetical: stating that the Mexican government's failure to interview potential witnesses or to provide the Court with all witness statements did not undermine the evidence establishing probable cause
citation_b.sentence: Salazar, 2010 WL 2925444, at *11 (stating that the Mexican government’s failure to interview potential witnesses or to provide the Court with all witness statements did not undermine the evidence establishing probable cause); see also Garza, 180 Fed.Appx. at 522 (upholding district court’s finding of probable cause even though there was no eyewitness identifying respondent as the shooter, but there was circumstantial evidence including that respondent had “quarreled with the victim and brandished a gun at him a few hours prior to the shooting” and that respondent was in Reynosa, Tamaulipas, Mexico the night of the murder).