context: However, based on the justifications offered by defendants in the classified documents reviewed by this Court, it cannot conclude that defendants' explanation for its change in policy is a post hoc rationalization.
citation_a.signal: no signal
citation_a.parenthetical: "National-security policy is the prerogative of the Congress and President."
citation_a.sentence: Ziglar v. Abbasi, — U.S. —, 137 S.Ct. 1843, 1861, 198 L.Ed.2d 290 (2017) (“National-security policy is the prerogative of the Congress and President.”); Schneider v. Kissinger, 412 F.3d 190, 195 (D.C. Cir. 2005); see also Adams v. Vance, 570 F.2d 950, 954 (D.C. Cir. 1978) (noting that application of injunctive-relief standards changes where core concerns of the executive branch are at stake).
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.identifier: 570 F.2d 950, 954
citation_b.parenthetical: noting that application of injunctive-relief standards changes where core concerns of the executive branch are at stake
citation_b.sentence: Ziglar v. Abbasi, — U.S. —, 137 S.Ct. 1843, 1861, 198 L.Ed.2d 290 (2017) (“National-security policy is the prerogative of the Congress and President.”); Schneider v. Kissinger, 412 F.3d 190, 195 (D.C. Cir. 2005); see also Adams v. Vance, 570 F.2d 950, 954 (D.C. Cir. 1978) (noting that application of injunctive-relief standards changes where core concerns of the executive branch are at stake).