context: This is not the only inquiry, though. The Court may also consider the financial burden placed on claimants as a result of the seizure.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 38 F.3d 323, 323
citation_a.parenthetical: pointing out that the nature of the prejudice suffered by a claimant differs in every case
citation_a.sentence: See also Jones, 38 F.3d at 323 (pointing out that the nature of the prejudice suffered by a claimant differs in every case).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 655 F.Supp. 1348, 1352
citation_b.parenthetical: holding that "prejudice ... can be presumed where [claimants are] deprived of the use of [their] property by the government without justifiable cause for a period of twenty-three months"
citation_b.sentence: See United States v. Sharp, 655 F.Supp. 1348, 1352 (W.D.Mo.1987) (holding that “prejudice ... can be presumed where [claimants are] deprived of the use of [their] property by the government without justifiable cause for a period of twenty-three months”).