context: . We note that a defendant charged with violating a condition of supervised release has limited due process rights.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.parenthetical: holding that revocation of parole does not impinge upon "absolute liberty" but only on "the conditional liberty properly dependent on observance of special parole restrictions"
citation_a.sentence: See Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471, 480, 92 S.Ct. 2593, 33 L.Ed.2d 484 (1972) (holding that revocation of parole does not impinge upon "absolute liberty” but only on "the conditional liberty properly dependent on observance of special parole restrictions”); see also United States v. Manuel, 732 F.3d 283, 291 (3d Cir.2013) (holding that "there is no constitutional right to representation by counsel at a parole revocation”).
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.identifier: 732 F.3d 283, 291
citation_b.parenthetical: holding that "there is no constitutional right to representation by counsel at a parole revocation"
citation_b.sentence: See Morrissey v. Brewer, 408 U.S. 471, 480, 92 S.Ct. 2593, 33 L.Ed.2d 484 (1972) (holding that revocation of parole does not impinge upon "absolute liberty” but only on "the conditional liberty properly dependent on observance of special parole restrictions”); see also United States v. Manuel, 732 F.3d 283, 291 (3d Cir.2013) (holding that "there is no constitutional right to representation by counsel at a parole revocation”).