context: Nevertheless, we hold that the district court's failure to comply with Rule 32(c)(3)(D)'s requirement and with our eases is harmless error.
citation_a.signal: no signal
citation_a.identifier: 3 F.3d 270, 270
citation_a.parenthetical: harmless error analysis applied to erroneous use of PSR as evidence at sentencing
citation_a.sentence: Hammer, 3 F.3d at 270 (harmless error analysis applied to erroneous use of PSR as evidence at sentencing); see also United States v. Montoya, 891 F.2d 1273, 1279 (7th Cir.1989) (failure to rule on controverted matters in PSR subject to harmless error analysis).
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.identifier: 891 F.2d 1273, 1279
citation_b.parenthetical: failure to rule on controverted matters in PSR subject to harmless error analysis
citation_b.sentence: Hammer, 3 F.3d at 270 (harmless error analysis applied to erroneous use of PSR as evidence at sentencing); see also United States v. Montoya, 891 F.2d 1273, 1279 (7th Cir.1989) (failure to rule on controverted matters in PSR subject to harmless error analysis).