context: See, e.g. Graham v. Children's Servs. In fact, the Oregon courts have gone so far as to hold that even a custodial grandparent lacks a protected interest in the adoption of her grandchildren.
citation_a.signal: no signal
citation_a.identifier: 591 P.2d 377, 377-78
citation_a.parenthetical: considering appeal by grandmother who had temporary custody of children for 14 months prior the filing of the adoption petition
citation_a.sentence: Graham, 591 P.2d at 377-78 (considering appeal by grandmother who had temporary custody of children for 14 months prior the filing of the adoption petition); see also Browder v. Harmeyer, 453 N.E.2d 301, 308-09 (Ind.Ct.App.1983) (similar); but cf. In re P.C., 842 P.2d 364, 367 (Ok.Ct.App.1992) (holding that grandmother in loco “parentis of her three grandchildren had protected liberty interest in their future care and custody).
citation_b.signal: but cf.
citation_b.identifier: 842 P.2d 364, 367
citation_b.parenthetical: holding that grandmother in loco "parentis of her three grandchildren had protected liberty interest in their future care and custody
citation_b.sentence: Graham, 591 P.2d at 377-78 (considering appeal by grandmother who had temporary custody of children for 14 months prior the filing of the adoption petition); see also Browder v. Harmeyer, 453 N.E.2d 301, 308-09 (Ind.Ct.App.1983) (similar); but cf. In re P.C., 842 P.2d 364, 367 (Ok.Ct.App.1992) (holding that grandmother in loco “parentis of her three grandchildren had protected liberty interest in their future care and custody).