context: The district court properly dismissed Patterson's RLUIPA claim for monetary relief because such a claim may proceed only for injunctive relief against defen dants acting within their official capacities.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 753 F.3d 899, 904
citation_a.parenthetical: RLUIPA does not contemplate liability of- government employees in individual capacity
citation_a.sentence: See Wood v. Yordy, 753 F.3d 899, 904 (9th Cir.2014) (RLUIPA does not contemplate liability of- government employees in individual capacity); see also Holley v. Cal. Dep't of Corr., 599 F.3d 1108, 1114 (9th Cir.2010) (“The Eleventh Amendment bars [the plaintiffs] suit for official-capacity damages under RLUIPA.”).
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.identifier: 599 F.3d 1108, 1114
citation_b.parenthetical: "The Eleventh Amendment bars [the plaintiffs] suit for official-capacity damages under RLUIPA."
citation_b.sentence: See Wood v. Yordy, 753 F.3d 899, 904 (9th Cir.2014) (RLUIPA does not contemplate liability of- government employees in individual capacity); see also Holley v. Cal. Dep't of Corr., 599 F.3d 1108, 1114 (9th Cir.2010) (“The Eleventh Amendment bars [the plaintiffs] suit for official-capacity damages under RLUIPA.”).