context: "Commerce retains broad discretion to define and clarify the scope of an antidumping investigation in a manner which reflects the intent of the petition."
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 796 F. Supp. 1532, 1535
citation_a.parenthetical: ''Commerce, however, must exercise cau-thion in redefining scope in midstream to include items which were clearly known about and excluded at the time of initiation of the investigation * * *."
citation_a.sentence: See Smith Corona v. United States, 16 CIT 562, 565, 796 F. Supp. 1532, 1535 (1992) (’’Commerce, however, must exercise cau-thion in redefining scope in midstream to include items which were clearly known about and excluded at the time of initiation of the investigation * * *.”).
citation_b.signal: no signal
citation_b.identifier: 782 F. Supp. 117, 120
citation_b.parenthetical: upholding as supported by substantial evidence scope clarification made after notice of initiation
citation_b.sentence: Minebea Co. v. United States, 16 CIT 20, 22; 782 F. Supp. 117, 120 (1992) (upholding as supported by substantial evidence scope clarification made after notice of initiation). This discretion is limited by the requirement that it be exercised reasonably and that any consequent determination be supported by substantial evidence in the administrative record.