context: This Court has jurisdiction to review a confined immigrant's application for a writ of habeas corpus.
citation_a.signal: no signal
citation_a.parenthetical: holding that "habeas jurisdiction under SS 2241 was not repealed by ... [the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996, 'IIRIRA']"
citation_a.sentence: INS v. St. Cyr, 533 U.S. 289, 312-13, 121 S.Ct. 2271, 150 L.Ed.2d 347 (2001) (holding that “habeas jurisdiction under § 2241 was not repealed by ... [the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996, ‘IIRIRA’]”).
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.parenthetical: finding jurisdiction to hear a habeas challenge to a de-portable immigrant's continued detention
citation_b.sentence: See also Bravo v. Ashcroft, 341 F.3d 590, 592-93 (5th Cir.2003) (noting that “federal courts retain habeas jurisdiction to review statutory and constitutional claims”); Zadvydas v. Underdawn, 185 F.3d 279 (5th Cir.1999) (finding jurisdiction to hear a habeas challenge to a de-portable immigrant’s continued detention), overruled on other grounds by Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. 678, 121 S.Ct. 2491, 150 L.Ed.2d 653 (2001).