context: Moreover, our review of the record persuades us that the record is not sufficiently developed for us to address the merits of Santiago-Lugo's Sixth Amendment claim at this time. Accordingly, we do not reach it.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 958 F.2d 9, 15
citation_a.parenthetical: "Time and again we have held that a claim of inadequate representation will not be resolved on direct appeal when the claim has not been raised in the district court, unless the critical facts are not in dispute and a sufficiently developed record exists."
citation_a.sentence: See, e.g., United States v. Gray, 958 F.2d 9, 15 (1st Cir.1992) (“Time and again we have held that a claim of inadequate representation will not be resolved on direct appeal when the claim has not been raised in the district court, unless the critical facts are not in dispute and a sufficiently developed record exists.”); see also United States v. Hoyos-Medina, 878 F.2d 21, 22 (1st Cir.1989) (“Fairness to the parties and judicial economy both warrant that, absent extraordinary circumstances, an appellate court will not consider an ineffective assistance claim where no endeavor was first made to determine the claim at the district court level.”).
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.identifier: 878 F.2d 21, 22
citation_b.parenthetical: "Fairness to the parties and judicial economy both warrant that, absent extraordinary circumstances, an appellate court will not consider an ineffective assistance claim where no endeavor was first made to determine the claim at the district court level."
citation_b.sentence: See, e.g., United States v. Gray, 958 F.2d 9, 15 (1st Cir.1992) (“Time and again we have held that a claim of inadequate representation will not be resolved on direct appeal when the claim has not been raised in the district court, unless the critical facts are not in dispute and a sufficiently developed record exists.”); see also United States v. Hoyos-Medina, 878 F.2d 21, 22 (1st Cir.1989) (“Fairness to the parties and judicial economy both warrant that, absent extraordinary circumstances, an appellate court will not consider an ineffective assistance claim where no endeavor was first made to determine the claim at the district court level.”).