context: "[T]he timely filing of a notice of appeal is a jurisdictional requirement." An untimely appeal must be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction; the requirement cannot be waived, and is not subject to equitable tolling.
citation_a.signal: no signal
citation_a.identifier: 127 S.Ct. 2366, 2366
citation_a.parenthetical: "Because this Court has no authority to create equitable exceptions to jurisdictional requirements, use of the 'unique circumstances' doctrine is illegitimate."
citation_a.sentence: Bowles, 127 S.Ct. at 2366 (“Because this Court has no authority to create equitable exceptions to jurisdictional requirements, use of the ‘unique circumstances’ doctrine is illegitimate.”); see International Rectifier Corp. v. IXYS Corp., 515 F.3d 1353, 1357-58 (Fed.Cir.2008) (“In Bowles, the Supreme Court emphasized the jurisdictional nature of notices of appeal and held that the jurisdictional rules lack equitable exceptions.”).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 515 F.3d 1353, 1357-58
citation_b.parenthetical: "In Bowles, the Supreme Court emphasized the jurisdictional nature of notices of appeal and held that the jurisdictional rules lack equitable exceptions."
citation_b.sentence: Bowles, 127 S.Ct. at 2366 (“Because this Court has no authority to create equitable exceptions to jurisdictional requirements, use of the ‘unique circumstances’ doctrine is illegitimate.”); see International Rectifier Corp. v. IXYS Corp., 515 F.3d 1353, 1357-58 (Fed.Cir.2008) (“In Bowles, the Supreme Court emphasized the jurisdictional nature of notices of appeal and held that the jurisdictional rules lack equitable exceptions.”).