context: As discussed above, this case is simply not about CITA's non-reviewable substantive decisions concerning the imposition of safeguards. Plaintiff challenges the existence of CITA's regulations and CITA's actions pursuant thereto. The Federal Circuit has held that such regulatory challenges do not require the exhaustion of administrative remedies.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 903 F.Supp. 76, 76-77
citation_a.parenthetical: finding question of CITA's ultra vires actions ripe for judicial review absent final agency action
citation_a.sentence: See AAEI-TAG II, 751 F.2d at 1245-46 (not requiring exhaustion under protest procedures where importers challenged existence of CITA-directed regulations imposing import restrictions); see also Fieldston Clothes, 19 CIT at 1185, 903 F.Supp. at 76-77 (finding question of CITA’s ultra vires actions ripe for judicial review absent final agency action).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 751 F.2d 1245, 1245-46
citation_b.parenthetical: not requiring exhaustion under protest procedures where importers challenged existence of CITA-directed regulations imposing import restrictions
citation_b.sentence: See AAEI-TAG II, 751 F.2d at 1245-46 (not requiring exhaustion under protest procedures where importers challenged existence of CITA-directed regulations imposing import restrictions); see also Fieldston Clothes, 19 CIT at 1185, 903 F.Supp. at 76-77 (finding question of CITA’s ultra vires actions ripe for judicial review absent final agency action).