context: Moreover, any diminution in the originals' value is justified because of the importance of excising this information to protect the privacy interests of the victims and intended victims.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 154 F.3d 930, 932
citation_a.parenthetical: upholding partial redaction of Kaczynski's psychiatric and competency reports, because court properly balanced privacy interests versus public right to know
citation_a.sentence: See, e.g., United States v. Kaczynski, 154 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir.1998) (upholding partial redaction of Kaczynski’s psychiatric and competency reports, because court properly balanced privacy interests versus public right to know); cf. Favish v. Office of Indep. Counsel, 217 F.3d 1168, 1173 (9th Cir.2000) (discussing privacy interests of survivors under Freedom of Information Act).
citation_b.signal: cf.
citation_b.identifier: 217 F.3d 1168, 1173
citation_b.parenthetical: discussing privacy interests of survivors under Freedom of Information Act
citation_b.sentence: See, e.g., United States v. Kaczynski, 154 F.3d 930, 932 (9th Cir.1998) (upholding partial redaction of Kaczynski’s psychiatric and competency reports, because court properly balanced privacy interests versus public right to know); cf. Favish v. Office of Indep. Counsel, 217 F.3d 1168, 1173 (9th Cir.2000) (discussing privacy interests of survivors under Freedom of Information Act).