context: Doc. 37 at PP 43, 47, 49-53, 76, 80, 83. Taken together, those allegations are sufficient to state an unfair conduct claim under the ICFA.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 762 F.Supp.2d 342, 353-54
citation_a.parenthetical: where complaint alleged "several injuries resulting from defendant's allegedly deceptive representations about HAMP, including wrongful foreclosures, increased fees, costs incurred to avoid foreclosure, loss of opportunities to pursue refinancing or loss mitigation strategies, and emotional distress," plaintiff adequately stated a claim under analogous Massachusetts consumer protection statute
citation_a.sentence: See Windy City, 536 F.3d at 672 (allegation of specific unfair conduct and resulting harm sufficient to state an ICFA unfairness claim); see also Bosque v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 762 F.Supp.2d 342, 353-54 (D.Mass.2011) (where complaint alleged “several injuries resulting from defendant’s allegedly deceptive representations about HAMP, including wrongful foreclosures, increased fees, costs incurred to avoid foreclosure, loss of opportunities to pursue refinancing or loss mitigation strategies, and emotional distress,” plaintiff adequately stated a claim under analogous Massachusetts consumer protection statute).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 536 F.3d 672, 672
citation_b.parenthetical: allegation of specific unfair conduct and resulting harm sufficient to state an ICFA unfairness claim
citation_b.sentence: See Windy City, 536 F.3d at 672 (allegation of specific unfair conduct and resulting harm sufficient to state an ICFA unfairness claim); see also Bosque v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 762 F.Supp.2d 342, 353-54 (D.Mass.2011) (where complaint alleged “several injuries resulting from defendant’s allegedly deceptive representations about HAMP, including wrongful foreclosures, increased fees, costs incurred to avoid foreclosure, loss of opportunities to pursue refinancing or loss mitigation strategies, and emotional distress,” plaintiff adequately stated a claim under analogous Massachusetts consumer protection statute).