context: Likewise, the medical evidence is devoid of any evidence showing that Claimant's condition has deteriorated or required aggressive medical treatment although Claimant testified otherwise at the hearing. After undergoing a discectomy and internal fixation with spinal reconstruction C5-C6 in July, 2004, Claimant's functional use of her cervical spine had been restored.
citation_a.signal: no signal
citation_a.identifier: 479 F.3d 979, 983
citation_a.parenthetical: noting that if impairment can be controlled by treatment, it cannot be considered disabling
citation_a.sentence: Schultz v. Astrue, 479 F.3d 979, 983 (8th Cir.2007) (noting that if impairment can be controlled by treatment, it cannot be considered disabling); see also Brown v. Barnhart, 390 F.3d 535, 540 (8th Cir.2004) (“If an impairment can be controlled by treatment or medication, it cannot be considered disabling.”).
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.identifier: 390 F.3d 535, 540
citation_b.parenthetical: "If an impairment can be controlled by treatment or medication, it cannot be considered disabling."
citation_b.sentence: Schultz v. Astrue, 479 F.3d 979, 983 (8th Cir.2007) (noting that if impairment can be controlled by treatment, it cannot be considered disabling); see also Brown v. Barnhart, 390 F.3d 535, 540 (8th Cir.2004) (“If an impairment can be controlled by treatment or medication, it cannot be considered disabling.”).