context: The government met the mail- and wire-fraud statutes' intent requirements through proof that K. Kennedy was reckless in his disregard for the truth of the statements that he made to victims to obtain their money.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 22 Fed.Appx. 404, 410
citation_a.parenthetical: noting that the government's evidence in a mail-fraud case met the intent requirement because it supported a jury finding that the defendant "deliberately ignored a high probability" that the securities form he submitted contained material false information
citation_a.sentence: See United States v. DeSantis, 134 F.3d 760, 764 (6th Cir.1998) (holding that the prosecution may establish the intent element of mail fraud by proving that the defendant was reckless); see also United States v. Turner, 22 Fed.Appx. 404, 410 (6th Cir.2001) (noting that the government’s evidence in a mail-fraud case met the intent requirement because it supported a jury finding that the defendant “deliberately ignored a high probability” that the securities form he submitted contained material false information).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 134 F.3d 760, 764
citation_b.parenthetical: holding that the prosecution may establish the intent element of mail fraud by proving that the defendant was reckless
citation_b.sentence: See United States v. DeSantis, 134 F.3d 760, 764 (6th Cir.1998) (holding that the prosecution may establish the intent element of mail fraud by proving that the defendant was reckless); see also United States v. Turner, 22 Fed.Appx. 404, 410 (6th Cir.2001) (noting that the government’s evidence in a mail-fraud case met the intent requirement because it supported a jury finding that the defendant “deliberately ignored a high probability” that the securities form he submitted contained material false information).