context: However, effects of the Act have been declared in violation of the ex post facto clause contained in the Indiana Constitution, as applied to persons who had committed their crimes prior to the imposition of any registration requirement.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 905 N.E.2d 371, 384
citation_a.parenthetical: defendant's conviction for failing to register as a sex offender was reversed because the registration statute, as applied to him, added punishment beyond that which could have been imposed when he committed his crime
citation_a.sentence: See Wallace v. State, 905 N.E.2d 371, 384 (Ind.2009) (defendant’s conviction for failing to register as a sex offender was reversed because the registration statute, as applied to him, added punishment beyond that which could have been imposed when he committed his crime), reh’g denied; see also State v. Pollard, 908 N.E.2d 1145, 1154 (Ind.2009) (trial court properly dismissed charge that Pollard violated the residency restriction provision of the Sex Offender Registration Act when he had served his sentence before the Act was enacted and application to him would add punishment beyond that possible when his crime was committed).
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.identifier: 908 N.E.2d 1145, 1154
citation_b.parenthetical: trial court properly dismissed charge that Pollard violated the residency restriction provision of the Sex Offender Registration Act when he had served his sentence before the Act was enacted and application to him would add punishment beyond that possible when his crime was committed
citation_b.sentence: See Wallace v. State, 905 N.E.2d 371, 384 (Ind.2009) (defendant’s conviction for failing to register as a sex offender was reversed because the registration statute, as applied to him, added punishment beyond that which could have been imposed when he committed his crime), reh’g denied; see also State v. Pollard, 908 N.E.2d 1145, 1154 (Ind.2009) (trial court properly dismissed charge that Pollard violated the residency restriction provision of the Sex Offender Registration Act when he had served his sentence before the Act was enacted and application to him would add punishment beyond that possible when his crime was committed).