context: Even taken in the light most favorable to Plaintiff, the summary judgment evidence does not establish a genuine issue of material fact that it was reasonably clear the additional repairs were covered under the Policy and that Defendant did not have a reasonable basis for delaying or denying payment.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 950 S.W.2d 54, 54-55
citation_a.parenthetical: for bad faith claim, insured must establish that insurer failed to settle the claim even though it "knew or should have known that it was reasonably clear that the claim was covered."
citation_a.sentence: See Giles, 950 S.W.2d at 54-55 (for bad faith claim, insured must establish that insurer failed to settle the claim even though it “knew or should have known that it was reasonably clear that the claim was covered.”); see also Viles, 788 S.W.2d at 567 (to determine reasonableness of insurer’s decision, court looks to facts insurer had at time it denied claim).
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.identifier: 788 S.W.2d 567, 567
citation_b.parenthetical: to determine reasonableness of insurer's decision, court looks to facts insurer had at time it denied claim
citation_b.sentence: See Giles, 950 S.W.2d at 54-55 (for bad faith claim, insured must establish that insurer failed to settle the claim even though it “knew or should have known that it was reasonably clear that the claim was covered.”); see also Viles, 788 S.W.2d at 567 (to determine reasonableness of insurer’s decision, court looks to facts insurer had at time it denied claim).