context: Prior to the issuance of Johnson, we had held that, although a statistical disparity could be sufficient to make a prima facie inference of bias, such a presumption could be dispelled by other relevant circumstances.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 371 F.3d 1091, 1091
citation_a.parenthetical: 'We sometimes consider whether the context in which a defendant made a Batson objection changes the significance of a statistical pattern in the exercise of peremptory challenges."
citation_a.sentence: See Paulino, 371 F.3d at 1091 (‘We sometimes consider whether the context in which a defendant made a Batson objection changes the significance of a statistical pattern in the exercise of peremptory challenges.”); see also Fernandez, 286 F.3d at 1079 (“Under Batson, we must consider ‘all relevant circumstances’ surrounding the challenges.”).
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.identifier: 286 F.3d 1079, 1079
citation_b.parenthetical: "Under Batson, we must consider 'all relevant circumstances' surrounding the challenges."
citation_b.sentence: See Paulino, 371 F.3d at 1091 (‘We sometimes consider whether the context in which a defendant made a Batson objection changes the significance of a statistical pattern in the exercise of peremptory challenges.”); see also Fernandez, 286 F.3d at 1079 (“Under Batson, we must consider ‘all relevant circumstances’ surrounding the challenges.”).