context: Nor could plaintiffs' conduct in the terminal be reasonably viewed as an escalation of events that would then have given rise to probable cause.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 393 F.3d 63, 71
citation_a.parenthetical: "The propriety of an officer's actions after an initial stop depends on ... how events unfold."
citation_a.sentence: See United States v. Romain, 393 F.3d 63, 71 (1st Cir.2004) (“The propriety of an officer’s actions after an initial stop depends on ... how events unfold.”); cf. Hooper, 935 F.2d at 494-95 (noting that investigation conducted pursuant to a valid Terry stop had yielded probable cause to arrest). The Court fails to grasp the significance of Farag telling Smith that because he spoke Arabic he had been asked by the Bureau of Prisons to translate tapes, and that guns had been pointed at him as a police officer — both logical consequences of his past and present employments.
citation_b.signal: cf.
citation_b.identifier: 935 F.2d 494, 494-95
citation_b.parenthetical: noting that investigation conducted pursuant to a valid Terry stop had yielded probable cause to arrest
citation_b.sentence: See United States v. Romain, 393 F.3d 63, 71 (1st Cir.2004) (“The propriety of an officer’s actions after an initial stop depends on ... how events unfold.”); cf. Hooper, 935 F.2d at 494-95 (noting that investigation conducted pursuant to a valid Terry stop had yielded probable cause to arrest). The Court fails to grasp the significance of Farag telling Smith that because he spoke Arabic he had been asked by the Bureau of Prisons to translate tapes, and that guns had been pointed at him as a police officer — both logical consequences of his past and present employments.