context: XIV. A two and one-half hour detention absent probable cause, accompanied by a search of both their vehicles and personal belongings, conducted in view of # an ever-growing crowd of on-lookers, would undoubtedly deter an average law-abiding citizen from similarly expressing controversial views on the streets of the greater Dayton area.
citation_a.signal: cf.
citation_a.identifier: 203 F.3d 964, 974
citation_a.parenthetical: loss of business after being removed from a police station's rotating call list sufficient to "deter the average wrecker service operator" from similarly criticizing defendant sheriff
citation_a.sentence: See McCurdy v. Montgomery County, 240 F.3d 512, 520 (6th Cir.2001) (impliedly acknowledging an arrest without probable cause constitutes adverse action of sufficient consequence); cf. Lucas v. Monroe County, 203 F.3d 964, 974 (6th Cir.2000) (loss of business after being removed from a police station’s rotating call list sufficient to “deter the average wrecker service operator” from similarly criticizing defendant sheriff).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 240 F.3d 512, 520
citation_b.parenthetical: impliedly acknowledging an arrest without probable cause constitutes adverse action of sufficient consequence
citation_b.sentence: See McCurdy v. Montgomery County, 240 F.3d 512, 520 (6th Cir.2001) (impliedly acknowledging an arrest without probable cause constitutes adverse action of sufficient consequence); cf. Lucas v. Monroe County, 203 F.3d 964, 974 (6th Cir.2000) (loss of business after being removed from a police station’s rotating call list sufficient to “deter the average wrecker service operator” from similarly criticizing defendant sheriff).