context: Given this basic precept, some courts have concluded that, if the court plans to rely upon facts not described in a presentence report, the defendant must be given prehear-ing notice of those facts and an opportunity to contest them.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.parenthetical: court properly recessed sentencing hearing and ordered investigation when defendant volunteered additional facts at hearing
citation_a.sentence: See United States v. Jackson, 32 F.3d 1101 (7th Cir.1994); United States v. Morales, 994 F.2d 386, 389 (7th Cir.1993)(“The defendant has a right to know what evidence will be used against him at the sentencing hearing.”); see also People v. Quarles, 182 Colo. 321, 512 P.2d 1240 (1973)(court properly recessed sentencing hearing and ordered investigation when defendant volunteered additional facts at hearing).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 994 F.2d 386, 389
citation_b.parenthetical: "The defendant has a right to know what evidence will be used against him at the sentencing hearing."
citation_b.sentence: See United States v. Jackson, 32 F.3d 1101 (7th Cir.1994); United States v. Morales, 994 F.2d 386, 389 (7th Cir.1993)(“The defendant has a right to know what evidence will be used against him at the sentencing hearing.”); see also People v. Quarles, 182 Colo. 321, 512 P.2d 1240 (1973)(court properly recessed sentencing hearing and ordered investigation when defendant volunteered additional facts at hearing).