context: . The State does not argue that rational basis scrutiny, as used in LaRue, applies. Even if it had, we agree'with the Third, Fourth, Sixth, Seventh, and Eleventh Circuits, which have all concluded that 44 Liquormart's reaffirmation of LaRue's holding suggests that the La-Rue regulations would have, and must have, survived intermediate scrutiny.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 837 F.2d 1268, 1273-74
citation_a.parenthetical: stating that where the First Amendment is implicated, courts' review must be "more intense"
citation_a.sentence: See SDJ, Inc. v. City of Houston, 837 F.2d 1268, 1273-74 (5th Cir.1988) (stating that where the First Amendment is implicated, courts’ review must be "more intense”); see also Fantasy Ranch, 459 F.3d at 555 (noting that intermediate scrutiny "routinely” applies to regulations of SOBs generally).
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.identifier: 459 F.3d 555, 555
citation_b.parenthetical: noting that intermediate scrutiny "routinely" applies to regulations of SOBs generally
citation_b.sentence: See SDJ, Inc. v. City of Houston, 837 F.2d 1268, 1273-74 (5th Cir.1988) (stating that where the First Amendment is implicated, courts’ review must be "more intense”); see also Fantasy Ranch, 459 F.3d at 555 (noting that intermediate scrutiny "routinely” applies to regulations of SOBs generally).