context: . Although the 2012 district court did not expressly rely on the Revised PSR in calculating the drug quantity, we may affirm that court's quantity finding "on any ground supported in the record." The fact that the original sentencing court likewise did not adopt the Revised PSR is not problematic either.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 694 F.3d 665, 670
citation_a.parenthetical: resentencing court may examine "the trial transcript, the sentencing hearing transcript, and the portions of the presentence report that the defendant admitted to or the sentencing court adopted" (emphasis added
citation_a.sentence: See United States v. Duncan, 639 F.3d 764, 768 (7th Cir.2011) (resentencing court entitled to rely on PSR that defendant failed to object to at original sentencing despite fact that original sentencing court did not adopt PSR); see also United States v. Hooks, 551 F.3d 1205, 1217 (10th Cir.2009) ("If a defendant fails to specifically object to a fact in the PSR, the fact is deemed admitted by the defendant....”); United States v. Valentine, 694 F.3d 665, 670 (6th Cir.2012) (resentencing court may examine “the trial transcript, the sentencing hearing transcript, and the portions of the presentence report that the defendant admitted to or the sentencing court adopted” (emphasis added)).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 639 F.3d 764, 768
citation_b.parenthetical: resentencing court entitled to rely on PSR that defendant failed to object to at original sentencing despite fact that original sentencing court did not adopt PSR
citation_b.sentence: See United States v. Duncan, 639 F.3d 764, 768 (7th Cir.2011) (resentencing court entitled to rely on PSR that defendant failed to object to at original sentencing despite fact that original sentencing court did not adopt PSR); see also United States v. Hooks, 551 F.3d 1205, 1217 (10th Cir.2009) ("If a defendant fails to specifically object to a fact in the PSR, the fact is deemed admitted by the defendant....”); United States v. Valentine, 694 F.3d 665, 670 (6th Cir.2012) (resentencing court may examine “the trial transcript, the sentencing hearing transcript, and the portions of the presentence report that the defendant admitted to or the sentencing court adopted” (emphasis added)).