context: I would adopt the third district's reasoning in its entirety. Thus, I would affirm the trial courts' denials of the appellants' motions for post-conviction relief.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 101 So.3d 886, 888
citation_a.parenthetical: agreeing with Geter, adopting its reasoning in its entirety, and holding that Miller should not be applied retroactively
citation_a.sentence: See Gonzalez v. State, 101 So.3d 886, 888 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (agreeing with Geter, adopting its reasoning in its entirety, and holding that Miller should not be applied retroactively); but see Toye v. State, 133 So.3d 540, 547 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) (concluding that Miller applies retroactively and certifying conflict with Geter and Gonzalez).
citation_b.signal: but see
citation_b.identifier: 133 So.3d 540, 547
citation_b.parenthetical: concluding that Miller applies retroactively and certifying conflict with Geter and Gonzalez
citation_b.sentence: See Gonzalez v. State, 101 So.3d 886, 888 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (agreeing with Geter, adopting its reasoning in its entirety, and holding that Miller should not be applied retroactively); but see Toye v. State, 133 So.3d 540, 547 (Fla. 2d DCA 2014) (concluding that Miller applies retroactively and certifying conflict with Geter and Gonzalez).