context: Moreover, to maintain a claim for abuse of process the plaintiff must allege that he was unlawfully arrested or his property unlawfully seized.
citation_a.signal: no signal
citation_a.identifier: 21 Md.App. 536, 536
citation_a.parenthetical: "[T]he injuries contemplated by this particular tort (and an indispensable element of it
citation_a.sentence: Herring, 21 Md.App. at 536, 321 A.2d 182 (“[T]he injuries contemplated by this particular tort (and an indispensable element of it) are limited to an improper arrest of the person or an improper seizure of property.”); see also One Thousand Fleet, 346 Md. at 45-46, 694 A.2d 952 (“The plaintiff [must] establish that an arrest of the person or a seizure of property of the plaintiff resulted from the abuse of process.”). Unfortunately, appellant has failed to allege either impropriety.
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.parenthetical: "The plaintiff [must] establish that an arrest of the person or a seizure of property of the plaintiff resulted from the abuse of process."
citation_b.sentence: Herring, 21 Md.App. at 536, 321 A.2d 182 (“[T]he injuries contemplated by this particular tort (and an indispensable element of it) are limited to an improper arrest of the person or an improper seizure of property.”); see also One Thousand Fleet, 346 Md. at 45-46, 694 A.2d 952 (“The plaintiff [must] establish that an arrest of the person or a seizure of property of the plaintiff resulted from the abuse of process.”). Unfortunately, appellant has failed to allege either impropriety.