context: Nor does the Remand Redetermination mention that Commerce asked for and received source data for the data in ques tion. In this circumstance, the failure to address the considerable amount of evidence contrary to the Department's finding that the data were not from publicly available sources casts doubt upon the validity of the finding itself.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 340 U.S. 474, 488
citation_a.parenthetical: "The substantiality of evidence must take into account whatever in the record fairly detracts from its weight."
citation_a.sentence: See Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474, 488 (1951) (“The substantiality of evidence must take into account whatever in the record fairly detracts from its weight.”); see also Cleo Inc. v. United States, 501 F.3d 1291, 1296 (Fed. Cir. 2007) (“Although a reviewing court must take into account contradictory evidence or any evidence in the record that undermines the agency’s finding, the substantial evidence test does not require that there be an absence of evidence detracting from the agency’s conclusion.”) (citing Universal Camera, 340 U.S. at 487-88).
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.identifier: 501 F.3d 1291, 1296
citation_b.parenthetical: "Although a reviewing court must take into account contradictory evidence or any evidence in the record that undermines the agency's finding, the substantial evidence test does not require that there be an absence of evidence detracting from the agency's conclusion."
citation_b.sentence: See Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474, 488 (1951) (“The substantiality of evidence must take into account whatever in the record fairly detracts from its weight.”); see also Cleo Inc. v. United States, 501 F.3d 1291, 1296 (Fed. Cir. 2007) (“Although a reviewing court must take into account contradictory evidence or any evidence in the record that undermines the agency’s finding, the substantial evidence test does not require that there be an absence of evidence detracting from the agency’s conclusion.”) (citing Universal Camera, 340 U.S. at 487-88).