context: The district court properly concluded that Miller failed to exhaust his administrative remedies on his Title VII and RA. claims because he failed'to complete the negotiated grievance procedure..
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 989 F.2d 768, 768
citation_a.parenthetical: a federal employee who is a union member and alleges employment discrimination must elect to pursue his claim under either a statutory procedure or a negotiated grievance procedure, but "he cannot pursue both avenues, and his election is irrevocable"
citation_a.sentence: See Vinieratos, 939 F.2d at 767-68 (“Title VII spe cifically requires a federal employee to exhaust his administrative remedies as a precondition to filing suit.”); Boyd, 752 F.2d at 418-14 (the same requirement applies to RA claims); see also Vinieratos, 989 F.2d at 768 (a federal employee who is a union member and alleges employment discrimination must elect to pursue his claim under either a statutory procedure or a negotiated grievance procedure, but “he cannot pursue both avenues, and his election is irrevocable”).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 939 F.2d 767, 767-68
citation_b.parenthetical: "Title VII spe cifically requires a federal employee to exhaust his administrative remedies as a precondition to filing suit."
citation_b.sentence: See Vinieratos, 939 F.2d at 767-68 (“Title VII spe cifically requires a federal employee to exhaust his administrative remedies as a precondition to filing suit.”); Boyd, 752 F.2d at 418-14 (the same requirement applies to RA claims); see also Vinieratos, 989 F.2d at 768 (a federal employee who is a union member and alleges employment discrimination must elect to pursue his claim under either a statutory procedure or a negotiated grievance procedure, but “he cannot pursue both avenues, and his election is irrevocable”).