context: (Tr., Doc. 77:7, fines 11-17.). Based on the clear evidence, I find that no connection existed between the gay pride speech and any disruptions that may have resulted at Ponce de Leon in September 2007.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 145 F.Supp.2d 1068, 1072
citation_a.parenthetical: finding that "other than the involvement of articles of clothing, little evidence has been presented to explain the nexus between a racial incident and the threat of a disruption relating to issues of sexuality."
citation_a.sentence: See Chambers v. Babbitt, 145 F.Supp.2d 1068, 1072 (D.Minn.2001) (finding that “other than the involvement of articles of clothing, little evidence has been presented to explain the nexus between a racial incident and the threat of a disruption relating to issues of sexuality.”); cf. Blackwell, supra, 363 F.2d at 754 (upholding ban on speech because “the reprehensible conduct ... was so inexorably tied to the wearing of the buttons that the two are not separable.”).
citation_b.signal: cf.
citation_b.identifier: 363 F.2d 754, 754
citation_b.parenthetical: upholding ban on speech because "the reprehensible conduct ... was so inexorably tied to the wearing of the buttons that the two are not separable."
citation_b.sentence: See Chambers v. Babbitt, 145 F.Supp.2d 1068, 1072 (D.Minn.2001) (finding that “other than the involvement of articles of clothing, little evidence has been presented to explain the nexus between a racial incident and the threat of a disruption relating to issues of sexuality.”); cf. Blackwell, supra, 363 F.2d at 754 (upholding ban on speech because “the reprehensible conduct ... was so inexorably tied to the wearing of the buttons that the two are not separable.”).