context: We have, therefore, held that a settlement for fraud in the sale of securities from 1975 to 1979 "is not the same as the claim that [the defendant] defrauded customers in the sale, purchase, and repurchase of other securities" in later years. Similarly, we have held that suits over later breaches of contract, financial transactions, and ship voyages are not barred by claim preclusion, even if the plaintiffs previously brought suit over earlier instances of this same conduct.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 904 F.2d 811, 816
citation_a.parenthetical: prior action did not preclude later suit regarding breaches of contract that occurred subsequent to the filing of a prior suit
citation_a.sentence: See Prime Mgmt. Co. v. Steinegger, 904 F.2d 811, 816 (2d Cir.1990) (prior action did not preclude later suit regarding breaches of contract that occurred subsequent to the filing of a prior suit); see also Greenberg, 968 F.2d at 168-70 (prior actions regarding earlier financial transactions did not preclude later suit over later financial transactions); Interoceanica Corp. v. Sound Pilots, Inc., 107 F.3d 86, 90-91 (2d Cir.1997) (prior suit regarding pilots’ fees in previous voyages did not preclude a subsequent suit regarding pilots’ rights in ocean voyages occurring after those underlying the first suit).
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.identifier: 968 F.2d 168, 168-70
citation_b.parenthetical: prior actions regarding earlier financial transactions did not preclude later suit over later financial transactions
citation_b.sentence: See Prime Mgmt. Co. v. Steinegger, 904 F.2d 811, 816 (2d Cir.1990) (prior action did not preclude later suit regarding breaches of contract that occurred subsequent to the filing of a prior suit); see also Greenberg, 968 F.2d at 168-70 (prior actions regarding earlier financial transactions did not preclude later suit over later financial transactions); Interoceanica Corp. v. Sound Pilots, Inc., 107 F.3d 86, 90-91 (2d Cir.1997) (prior suit regarding pilots’ fees in previous voyages did not preclude a subsequent suit regarding pilots’ rights in ocean voyages occurring after those underlying the first suit).