context: Lambeth's continued detention to await the arrival of a canine unit after the completion of the traffic stop investigation and after the completion of the investigations into the troopers' other reasonable suspicions -- that Lambeth was driving with an expired license, had no registration sticker, and was driving while intoxicated -- violated his Fourth Amendment rights. Because Lambeth's detention should have ended prior to the point in time when Trooper Hatfield said that he smelled marijuana on Lambeth, this fact cannot retroactively justify Lambeth's unauthorized, continued detention.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 54 S.W.3d 924, 924
citation_a.parenthetical: explaining that traffic stop will not justify continued detention to await the arrival of a drug detection dog
citation_a.sentence: See Davis, 947 S.W.2d at 244-45; $217,590.00 In U.S. Currency, 54 S.W.3d at 924 (explaining that traffic stop will not justify continued detention to await the arrival of a drug detection dog).
citation_b.signal: cf.
citation_b.parenthetical: holding officer's articulated reasonable suspicion justified appellant's contin ued detention to await canine unit when officer suspected appellant of drug trafficking based on appellant's prior arrests for drug offenses, appellant's lie about his prior criminal history, and appellant's possession of small jeweler's bags used in cocaine trafficking
citation_b.sentence: Cf. Coleman v. State, 188 S.W.3d 708, 719 (Tex.App.-Tyler 2005, pet. ref'd) (holding officer’s articulated reasonable suspicion justified appellant’s contin ued detention to await canine unit when officer suspected appellant of drug trafficking based on appellant’s prior arrests for drug offenses, appellant’s lie about his prior criminal history, and appellant’s possession of small jeweler’s bags used in cocaine trafficking), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 502, 166 L.Ed.2d 376 (2006).