context: This court has repeatedly held that a person is not entitled to be notified of her Miranda rights before an interrogation if that person is not "in custody."
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 923 F.2d 1193, 1196
citation_a.parenthetical: warnings not required where person being interrogated was not in custody
citation_a.sentence: See, e.g., United States v. Peete, 919 F.2d 1168, 1176 (6th Cir.1990) (Miranda “only applies to situations involving custodial interrogations”); United States v. Macklin, 900 F.2d 948, 950-951 (6th Cir.1990) (“A person is entitled to receive Miranda warnings only if questioned while in custody.”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 116, 112 L.Ed.2d 86 (1990); United States v. Knox, 839 F.2d 285, 291-292 (6th Cir.1988) (“ Miranda warnings are required only where there has been such a restriction on a person’s freedom, as to render him in custody.’ ”) (internal quotations omitted) (quoting Oregon v. Mathiason, 429 U.S. 492, 97 S.Ct. 711, 50 L.Ed.2d 714 (1977)), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1019, 109 S.Ct. 1742, 104 L.Ed.2d 179 (1989); see also United States v. Wolak, 923 F.2d 1193,1196 (6th Cir.1991) (warnings not required where person being interrogated was not in custody), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2824, 115 L.Ed.2d 995 (1991).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.parenthetical: "A person is entitled to receive Miranda warnings only if questioned while in custody."
citation_b.sentence: See, e.g., United States v. Peete, 919 F.2d 1168, 1176 (6th Cir.1990) (Miranda “only applies to situations involving custodial interrogations”); United States v. Macklin, 900 F.2d 948, 950-951 (6th Cir.1990) (“A person is entitled to receive Miranda warnings only if questioned while in custody.”), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 116, 112 L.Ed.2d 86 (1990); United States v. Knox, 839 F.2d 285, 291-292 (6th Cir.1988) (“ Miranda warnings are required only where there has been such a restriction on a person’s freedom, as to render him in custody.’ ”) (internal quotations omitted) (quoting Oregon v. Mathiason, 429 U.S. 492, 97 S.Ct. 711, 50 L.Ed.2d 714 (1977)), cert. denied, 490 U.S. 1019, 109 S.Ct. 1742, 104 L.Ed.2d 179 (1989); see also United States v. Wolak, 923 F.2d 1193,1196 (6th Cir.1991) (warnings not required where person being interrogated was not in custody), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 2824, 115 L.Ed.2d 995 (1991).