context: The comprehensiveness of the regulatory scheme also weighs in favor of a strong federal interest.
citation_a.signal: cf.
citation_a.identifier: 490 U.S. 177, 177
citation_a.parenthetical: Bracket balancing weighed against preemption where federal and tribal governments did not "exercise comprehensive regulatory control" over on-reservation oil and gas production
citation_a.sentence: Barona Band of Mission Indians v. Yee, 528 F.3d 1184, 1192 (9th Cir.2008) (“Federal interests are greatest when the government's regulation of a given sphere is ‘comprehensive and pervasive.’ ”) (internal citation omitted); Bracket, 448 U.S. at 148, 100 S.Ct. 2578 (state tax was preempted where “the federal regulatory scheme [was] so pervasive as to preclude the additional burdens sought to be imposed.”); cf. Cotton Petroleum, 490 U.S. at 177, 109 S.Ct. 1698 (Bracket balancing weighed against preemption where federal and tribal governments did not “exercise comprehensive regulatory control” over on-reservation oil and gas production).
citation_b.signal: no signal
citation_b.identifier: 528 F.3d 1184, 1192
citation_b.parenthetical: "Federal interests are greatest when the government's regulation of a given sphere is 'comprehensive and pervasive.' "
citation_b.sentence: Barona Band of Mission Indians v. Yee, 528 F.3d 1184, 1192 (9th Cir.2008) (“Federal interests are greatest when the government's regulation of a given sphere is ‘comprehensive and pervasive.’ ”) (internal citation omitted); Bracket, 448 U.S. at 148, 100 S.Ct. 2578 (state tax was preempted where “the federal regulatory scheme [was] so pervasive as to preclude the additional burdens sought to be imposed.”); cf. Cotton Petroleum, 490 U.S. at 177, 109 S.Ct. 1698 (Bracket balancing weighed against preemption where federal and tribal governments did not “exercise comprehensive regulatory control” over on-reservation oil and gas production).