context: Again, our inquiry is limited to determining whether there is sufficient evidence upon which a reasonable jury could conclude Stanley's guilt. After diligently reviewing the record, we find that the evidence is sufficient to convict Stanley on all three Travel Act Counts.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 706 F.2d 1351, 1351
citation_a.parenthetical: where Travel Act conviction was challenged, applying reasonable jury standard to uphold that conviction
citation_a.sentence: See Carrion, 809 F.2d at 1127 (finding enough evidence to establish continuous course of conduct for Travel Act purposes); see also Cauble, 706 F.2d at 1351 (where Travel Act conviction was challenged, applying reasonable jury standard to uphold that conviction).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 809 F.2d 1127, 1127
citation_b.parenthetical: finding enough evidence to establish continuous course of conduct for Travel Act purposes
citation_b.sentence: See Carrion, 809 F.2d at 1127 (finding enough evidence to establish continuous course of conduct for Travel Act purposes); see also Cauble, 706 F.2d at 1351 (where Travel Act conviction was challenged, applying reasonable jury standard to uphold that conviction).