context: Enforcing an agreement, such as this one, that requires the parents to meet and agree after they already have demonstrated their inability to agree exposes the child to further discord and surrounds the child with an atmosphere of hostility and insecurity.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 328 A.2d 691, 695
citation_a.parenthetical: agreement providing for choice of school by noncustodial parent deleted from separation agreement because it would lead to further parental conflict
citation_a.sentence: See Cleveland v. Cleveland, 165 Conn. 95, 328 A.2d 691, 695 (1973) (agreement providing for choice of school by noncustodial parent deleted from separation agreement because it would lead to further parental conflict); cf. Rhoades v. Rhoades, 188 Colo. 423, 428, 535 P.2d 1122, 1125 (1975) (statute awarding child rearing decisions to custodial parent has rational basis because it will avoid the “constant buffeting of a child between two parents who disagree on the issues of the child’s upbringing, including his education, health care and religious training_”).
citation_b.signal: cf.
citation_b.identifier: 188 Colo. 423, 428
citation_b.parenthetical: statute awarding child rearing decisions to custodial parent has rational basis because it will avoid the "constant buffeting of a child between two parents who disagree on the issues of the child's upbringing, including his education, health care and religious training_"
citation_b.sentence: See Cleveland v. Cleveland, 165 Conn. 95, 328 A.2d 691, 695 (1973) (agreement providing for choice of school by noncustodial parent deleted from separation agreement because it would lead to further parental conflict); cf. Rhoades v. Rhoades, 188 Colo. 423, 428, 535 P.2d 1122, 1125 (1975) (statute awarding child rearing decisions to custodial parent has rational basis because it will avoid the “constant buffeting of a child between two parents who disagree on the issues of the child’s upbringing, including his education, health care and religious training_”).