context: See generally Utah R. Civ. P. 11. On August 26, 1991, the trial court granted the Kurzets' partial summary judgment motion, dismissing Bailey-Alien's mechanics' lien cause of action. Bailey-Alien then filed a Motion for Reconsideration of the Order Dismissing the Mechanie[s'] Lien Claim, which the court later denied. Bailey-Alien did not seek appellate review of the trial court's denial of their reconsideration motion.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 920 P.2d 1159, 1161
citation_a.parenthetical: reviewing appellate court jurisdiction over appeal from denial of motion to reconsider
citation_a.sentence: See Ross v. Schackel, 920 P.2d 1159, 1161 (Utah 1996) (reviewing appellate court jurisdiction over appeal from denial of motion to reconsider); cf. Arnica Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schettler, 768 P.2d 950, 970 (Utah Ct.App.1989) (“If Schettler believed the trial court erred in denying his first motion to set aside the default judgment, the appropriate remedy was by direct appeal_”).
citation_b.signal: cf.
citation_b.identifier: 768 P.2d 950, 970
citation_b.parenthetical: "If Schettler believed the trial court erred in denying his first motion to set aside the default judgment, the appropriate remedy was by direct appeal_"
citation_b.sentence: See Ross v. Schackel, 920 P.2d 1159, 1161 (Utah 1996) (reviewing appellate court jurisdiction over appeal from denial of motion to reconsider); cf. Arnica Mut. Ins. Co. v. Schettler, 768 P.2d 950, 970 (Utah Ct.App.1989) (“If Schettler believed the trial court erred in denying his first motion to set aside the default judgment, the appropriate remedy was by direct appeal_”).