context: . We also note, as an alternative basis for holding that Abbas is not eligible for withholding of removal, that he failed to demonstrate that he would be subject to persecution by the government or with the government's acquiescence.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 557 F.3d 429, 436
citation_a.parenthetical: petitioner not entitled to withholding of removal because he presented "insufficient evidence to demonstrate that the government would be unwilling or unable to control" the persons threatening harm
citation_a.sentence: See Raza v. Gonzales, 484 F.3d 125, 129 (1st Cir.2007) ("When an asylum claim focuses on non-govemmental conduct, its fate depends on some showing either that the alleged persecutors are aligned with the government or that the government is unwilling or unable to control them.”); see also Khalili v. Holder, 557 F.3d 429, 436 (6th Cir.2009) (petitioner not entitled to withholding of removal because he presented "insufficient evidence to demonstrate that the government would be unwilling or unable to control” the persons threatening harm).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 484 F.3d 125, 129
citation_b.parenthetical: "When an asylum claim focuses on non-govemmental conduct, its fate depends on some showing either that the alleged persecutors are aligned with the government or that the government is unwilling or unable to control them."
citation_b.sentence: See Raza v. Gonzales, 484 F.3d 125, 129 (1st Cir.2007) ("When an asylum claim focuses on non-govemmental conduct, its fate depends on some showing either that the alleged persecutors are aligned with the government or that the government is unwilling or unable to control them.”); see also Khalili v. Holder, 557 F.3d 429, 436 (6th Cir.2009) (petitioner not entitled to withholding of removal because he presented "insufficient evidence to demonstrate that the government would be unwilling or unable to control” the persons threatening harm).