context: In its brief, DOCS omits the sentence in the regulations immediately following the passage it quotes. That sentence indicates that "[o]ther impairments, however, such as HIV infection, are inherently substantially limiting." 29 C.F.R. Pt. 1630, App. SS 1630.2Q). This unquoted sentence undercuts DOCS's argument since it confirms that some diagnoses can reveal an impairment which is "inherently substantially limiting."
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 527 U.S. 566, 566
citation_a.parenthetical: noting that some impairments may invariably cause a substantial limitation of a major life activity
citation_a.sentence: See also Albertson’s, 527 U.S. at 566, 119 S.Ct. 2162 (noting that some impairments may invariably cause a substantial limitation of a major life activity); cf. Fountain, 190 F.Supp.2d at 339 (noting that the general diagnosis “received chemotherapy” would cause an employee to divulge a disability or perceived disability).
citation_b.signal: cf.
citation_b.identifier: 190 F.Supp.2d 339, 339
citation_b.parenthetical: noting that the general diagnosis "received chemotherapy" would cause an employee to divulge a disability or perceived disability
citation_b.sentence: See also Albertson’s, 527 U.S. at 566, 119 S.Ct. 2162 (noting that some impairments may invariably cause a substantial limitation of a major life activity); cf. Fountain, 190 F.Supp.2d at 339 (noting that the general diagnosis “received chemotherapy” would cause an employee to divulge a disability or perceived disability).