context: (Emphases added.) Because HRCP 12(b) is identical to Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP), the federal courts' interpretation of this rule is highly persuasive.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 50 Haw. 528, 532
citation_a.parenthetical: federal courts' interpretations of the FRCP are deemed "highly persuasive in, the reasoning of this court" since the HRCP were patterned after the federal rules
citation_a.sentence: See Harada v. Burns, 50 Haw. 528, 532, 445 P.2d 376, 380 (1968) (federal courts’ interpretations of the FRCP are deemed “highly persuasive in, the reasoning of this court” since the HRCP were patterned after the federal rules); see also Compass Dev., Inc. v. Blevins, 10 Haw.App. 388, 394, 876 P.2d 1335, 1338 (1994) (because HRCP Rule 41(b) is identical to FRCP Rule 41(b), the U.S. Supreme Court’s interpretation of the federal rule is persuasive).
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.identifier: 10 Haw.App. 388, 394
citation_b.parenthetical: because HRCP Rule 41(b) is identical to FRCP Rule 41(b), the U.S. Supreme Court's interpretation of the federal rule is persuasive
citation_b.sentence: See Harada v. Burns, 50 Haw. 528, 532, 445 P.2d 376, 380 (1968) (federal courts’ interpretations of the FRCP are deemed “highly persuasive in, the reasoning of this court” since the HRCP were patterned after the federal rules); see also Compass Dev., Inc. v. Blevins, 10 Haw.App. 388, 394, 876 P.2d 1335, 1338 (1994) (because HRCP Rule 41(b) is identical to FRCP Rule 41(b), the U.S. Supreme Court’s interpretation of the federal rule is persuasive).