context: "As a general rule, claims of ineffective assistance of counsel are not ordinarily cognizable on direct appeal. The exception is when the error is apparent on the face of the record, which is rarely the case."
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.parenthetical: ineffective assistance of counsel apparent on face of record based on failure to request a specific jury instruction
citation_a.sentence: Desire v. State, 928 So.2d 1256, 1257 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006); Bruno v. State, 807 So.2d 55, 63 n. 14 (Fla.2001) (“A claim of ineffectiveness can properly be raised on direct appeal only if the record on its face demonstrates ineffectiveness.”); see, e.g., Aversano v. State, 966 So.2d 493 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (ineffective assistance of counsel apparent on face of record based on failure to request a specific jury instruction).
citation_b.signal: no signal
citation_b.parenthetical: "A claim of ineffectiveness can properly be raised on direct appeal only if the record on its face demonstrates ineffectiveness."
citation_b.sentence: Desire v. State, 928 So.2d 1256, 1257 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006); Bruno v. State, 807 So.2d 55, 63 n. 14 (Fla.2001) (“A claim of ineffectiveness can properly be raised on direct appeal only if the record on its face demonstrates ineffectiveness.”); see, e.g., Aversano v. State, 966 So.2d 493 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007) (ineffective assistance of counsel apparent on face of record based on failure to request a specific jury instruction).