context: Accordingly, we hold that the procedure limned in 18 U.S.C. SS 3626(b) applies to any existing prospective relief, regardless of when that relief was first ordered.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 245 F.3d 718, 720
citation_a.parenthetical: holding that prospective relief made "in the absence of the required findings" is immediately terminable "regardless of when ordered"
citation_a.sentence: See Miller, 530 U.S. at 333, 120 S.Ct. 2246 (stating that section 3626(b) applies to “existing injunctions”); Harvey v. Schoen, 245 F.3d 718, 720 (8th Cir. 2001) (holding that prospective relief made “in the absence of the required findings” is immediately terminable “regardless of when ordered”); see also Rouse, 129 F.3d at 654 (suggesting that the termination procedures set forth in section 3626(b) apply to all existing federal court orders).
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.identifier: 129 F.3d 654, 654
citation_b.parenthetical: suggesting that the termination procedures set forth in section 3626(b) apply to all existing federal court orders
citation_b.sentence: See Miller, 530 U.S. at 333, 120 S.Ct. 2246 (stating that section 3626(b) applies to “existing injunctions”); Harvey v. Schoen, 245 F.3d 718, 720 (8th Cir. 2001) (holding that prospective relief made “in the absence of the required findings” is immediately terminable “regardless of when ordered”); see also Rouse, 129 F.3d at 654 (suggesting that the termination procedures set forth in section 3626(b) apply to all existing federal court orders).