context: The court is also aware that survey evidence can be used in FDCPA cases to show how readers unburdened by a legal education or other experience or education in business and legal matters might interpret collection notices.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 169 F.3d 1057, 1060
citation_a.parenthetical: explaining that survey evidence under the FDCPA would be useful only if it included some benchmark measure comparing the understanding of lawful notices, since one would expect some level of confusion among unsophisticated consumers even of perfectly lawful notices
citation_a.sentence: See Durkin, 406 F.3d at 419, 422-23 (affirming summary judgment for defense after finding that district court properly rejected survey evidence as irrelevant and unreliable); Chuway, 362 F.3d at 948; Pettit v. Retrieval Masters Creditor Bureau, Inc., 211 F.3d 1057, 1062 (7th Cir.2000); see also Johnson v. Revenue Management Corp., 169 F.3d 1057, 1060 (7th Cir.1999) (explaining that survey evidence under the FDCPA would be useful only if it included some benchmark measure comparing the understanding of lawful notices, since one would expect some level of confusion among unsophisticated consumers even of perfectly lawful notices).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 406 F.3d 419, 419, 422-23
citation_b.parenthetical: affirming summary judgment for defense after finding that district court properly rejected survey evidence as irrelevant and unreliable
citation_b.sentence: See Durkin, 406 F.3d at 419, 422-23 (affirming summary judgment for defense after finding that district court properly rejected survey evidence as irrelevant and unreliable); Chuway, 362 F.3d at 948; Pettit v. Retrieval Masters Creditor Bureau, Inc., 211 F.3d 1057, 1062 (7th Cir.2000); see also Johnson v. Revenue Management Corp., 169 F.3d 1057, 1060 (7th Cir.1999) (explaining that survey evidence under the FDCPA would be useful only if it included some benchmark measure comparing the understanding of lawful notices, since one would expect some level of confusion among unsophisticated consumers even of perfectly lawful notices).