context: The plaintiff makes no argument in his brief before us, as he did in the court below, that the defendants' easements "to the Annisquam River" do not extend as set out in the judgment. (See n.6.)
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 22 Pick. 85, 94
citation_a.parenthetical: presumption in grant is that it extends to low water mark
citation_a.sentence: See also Valentine v. Piper, 22 Pick. 85, 94 (1839) (presumption in grant is that it extends to low water mark); Frankel, Law of Seashore Waters and Water Courses: Maine and Massachusetts 50-51 (1969).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 342 Mass. 251, 260-261
citation_b.parenthetical: "words of similar import . . . convey title to the low water mark"
citation_b.sentence: See Old Colony St. Ry. v. Phillips, 207 Mass. 174, 179-181 (1911); Michaelson v. Silver Beach Improvement Assn., 342 Mass. 251, 260-261 (1961) (“words of similar import . . . convey title to the low water mark”).