context: Parol evidence may be used, however, to show that false representations were made when the contract was executed.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 300 A.2d 189, 189
citation_a.parenthetical: parole evidence "does not preclude evidence that would tend to subvert or overthrow the writing entirely"
citation_a.sentence: May v. Shohan, 131 N.J.L. 321, 36 A.2d 409 (1944); See also Emerson, 300 A.2d at 189 (parole evidence “does not preclude evidence that would tend to subvert or overthrow the writing entirely”).
citation_b.signal: no signal
citation_b.parenthetical: parol evidence admissible where defendant agreed to fill in certain terms in contract but did not do so
citation_b.sentence: Kero v. Terminal Construction Corp., 6 N.J. 361, 78 A.2d 814 (1951) (parol evidence admissible where defendant agreed to fill in certain terms in contract but did not do so). Such an exception is limited, though, to those instances where one party seeks to disaffirm the contract rather than alter or change the agreement.