context: Accordingly, the Court will not address them. Even if these allegations were included in the complaint, the Court notes that the plaintiff does not allege any harm arising from alleged violations of ERISA reporting procedures and he has not shown any indication that he detrimentally relied or was prejudiced by any violations.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 951 F.2d 739, 743
citation_a.parenthetical: employer's failure to comply with ERISA's reporting procedures excused because no showing of bad faith or active concealment
citation_a.sentence: See Govoni, 732 F.2d at 252 (collecting cases requiring reliance and prejudice to entitle employees to monetary relief for employer’s procedural violations of ERISA); see also Kreutzer v. A.O. Smith Corp., 951 F.2d 739, 743 (7th Cir.1991) (employer’s failure to comply with ERISA’s reporting procedures excused because no showing of bad faith or active concealment).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 732 F.2d 252, 252
citation_b.parenthetical: collecting cases requiring reliance and prejudice to entitle employees to monetary relief for employer's procedural violations of ERISA
citation_b.sentence: See Govoni, 732 F.2d at 252 (collecting cases requiring reliance and prejudice to entitle employees to monetary relief for employer’s procedural violations of ERISA); see also Kreutzer v. A.O. Smith Corp., 951 F.2d 739, 743 (7th Cir.1991) (employer’s failure to comply with ERISA’s reporting procedures excused because no showing of bad faith or active concealment).