context: Evid. 801(e)(2)(C),(D). Moreover, such discrepancy goes to the weight, not the admissibility of the translated statement.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 788 S.W.2d 1, 10
citation_a.parenthetical: stating any discrepancy in testimony goes only to weight of evidence and not its admissibility
citation_a.sentence: See Stoker v. State, 788 S.W.2d 1, 10 (Tex.Crim.App.1989) (stating any discrepancy in testimony goes only to weight of evidence and not its admissibility); see also State v. Patino, 177 Wis.2d 348, 502 N.W.2d 601, 610 (1993) (holding that discrepancy between declarant's testimony at preliminary hearing compared to his translated statement offered at trial went to weight not admissibility of statement).
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.identifier: 502 N.W.2d 601, 610
citation_b.parenthetical: holding that discrepancy between declarant's testimony at preliminary hearing compared to his translated statement offered at trial went to weight not admissibility of statement
citation_b.sentence: See Stoker v. State, 788 S.W.2d 1, 10 (Tex.Crim.App.1989) (stating any discrepancy in testimony goes only to weight of evidence and not its admissibility); see also State v. Patino, 177 Wis.2d 348, 502 N.W.2d 601, 610 (1993) (holding that discrepancy between declarant's testimony at preliminary hearing compared to his translated statement offered at trial went to weight not admissibility of statement).