context: Although she argued in her brief before the BIA that the IJ created an unnecessarily hostile environment, she never referred to a violation of her due process rights or alluded to the hearing being fundamentally unfair or precluding judicial review. See A.R. at 23-24. Because Gomez failed to raise her due process challenge in her BIA appeal, we lack jurisdiction to consider this issue.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 252 F.3d 383, 389
citation_a.parenthetical: noting that the BIA should be given the first opportunity to correct any procedural errors committed during the petitioner's hearing
citation_a.sentence: See Rodriguez, 9 F.3d at 414 (“Because [the petitioner] failed to raise this issue before the BIA, he has not exhausted his administrative remedies, and we have no jurisdiction to consider these grounds.”); see also Goonsuwan v. Ashcroft, 252 F.3d 383, 389 (5th Cir.2001) (noting that the BIA should be given the first opportunity to correct any procedural errors committed during the petitioner’s hearing).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 9 F.3d 414, 414
citation_b.parenthetical: "Because [the petitioner] failed to raise this issue before the BIA, he has not exhausted his administrative remedies, and we have no jurisdiction to consider these grounds."
citation_b.sentence: See Rodriguez, 9 F.3d at 414 (“Because [the petitioner] failed to raise this issue before the BIA, he has not exhausted his administrative remedies, and we have no jurisdiction to consider these grounds.”); see also Goonsuwan v. Ashcroft, 252 F.3d 383, 389 (5th Cir.2001) (noting that the BIA should be given the first opportunity to correct any procedural errors committed during the petitioner’s hearing).