context: P 10 The State contends, and Hansen concedes, that if A.R.S. SS 13-804.D is substantive, it indisputably governs.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.parenthetical: "In Arizona, the legislature is endowed with the legislative power of the State, and has plenary power to consider any subject within the scope of government unless the provisions of the Constitution restrain it."
citation_a.sentence: See State v. Murray, 194 Ariz. 373, 375 ¶6, 982 P.2d 1287, 1289 (1999) (“Within constitutional limits, the legislature is vested with plenary power to change the substantive law prospectively ____”); see also Brown, 194 Ariz. at 342 ¶ 5, 982 P.2d at 817 (“In Arizona, the legislature is endowed with the legislative power of the State, and has plenary power to consider any subject within the scope of government unless the provisions of the Constitution restrain it.”).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 982 P.2d 1287, 1289
citation_b.parenthetical: "Within constitutional limits, the legislature is vested with plenary power to change the substantive law prospectively ____"
citation_b.sentence: See State v. Murray, 194 Ariz. 373, 375 ¶6, 982 P.2d 1287, 1289 (1999) (“Within constitutional limits, the legislature is vested with plenary power to change the substantive law prospectively ____”); see also Brown, 194 Ariz. at 342 ¶ 5, 982 P.2d at 817 (“In Arizona, the legislature is endowed with the legislative power of the State, and has plenary power to consider any subject within the scope of government unless the provisions of the Constitution restrain it.”).