context: The court cautioned, however, that the time for filing such motions is not unlimited. The district court may, in the exercise of its discretion, "deny as untimely a non-procedural-defect, non-jurisdietional motion to remand if made at an unreasonably late stage of the federal litigation."
citation_a.signal: no signal
citation_a.identifier: 965 F.2d 1497, 1502-03
citation_a.parenthetical: thirty-day limit not applicable to motion for remand based upon abstention
citation_a.sentence: Id. at 1213 n. 8. Accord: Melahn v. Pennock Insurance, Inc., 965 F.2d 1497, 1502-03 (8th Cir.1992) (thirty-day limit not applicable to motion for remand based upon abstention).
citation_b.signal: cf.
citation_b.identifier: 932 F.2d 1518, 1522
citation_b.parenthetical: thirty-day limit applies to all motions for remand not based on subject matter jurisdiction
citation_b.sentence: Cf. In re Shell Oil Co., 932 F.2d 1518, 1522 (5th Cir.1991), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 112 S.Ct. 914, 116 L.Ed.2d 814 (1992) (thirty-day limit applies to all motions for remand not based on subject matter jurisdiction).