context: The court can determine class members' consent through class-wide proof.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 301 F.R.D. 292, 299
citation_a.parenthetical: denying motion to strike class claims as immature because discovery would reveal whether proposed class members' claims are susceptible to generalized proof
citation_a.sentence: See Buonomo v. Optimum Outcomes, Inc., 301 F.R.D. 292, 299 (N.D.Ill.2014) (denying motion to strike class claims as immature because discovery would reveal whether proposed class members’ claims are susceptible to generalized proof); cf. Gene & Gene L.L.C. v. Bio-Pay, L.L.C., 541 F.3d 318, 329 (5th Cir.2008) (reversing the trial court’s class certification because the defendant had “culled fax numbers from a variety of sources over a period of time, such that class-wide proof of consent [wa]s not possible”).
citation_b.signal: cf.
citation_b.identifier: 541 F.3d 318, 329
citation_b.parenthetical: reversing the trial court's class certification because the defendant had "culled fax numbers from a variety of sources over a period of time, such that class-wide proof of consent [wa]s not possible"
citation_b.sentence: See Buonomo v. Optimum Outcomes, Inc., 301 F.R.D. 292, 299 (N.D.Ill.2014) (denying motion to strike class claims as immature because discovery would reveal whether proposed class members’ claims are susceptible to generalized proof); cf. Gene & Gene L.L.C. v. Bio-Pay, L.L.C., 541 F.3d 318, 329 (5th Cir.2008) (reversing the trial court’s class certification because the defendant had “culled fax numbers from a variety of sources over a period of time, such that class-wide proof of consent [wa]s not possible”).