context: The Fourth Circuit has also adopted this interpretation of section 33(f) in determining apportionment among parties. See I.T.O.
citation_a.signal: no signal
citation_a.parenthetical: "Employer's offset rights [under section 33(g)] are limited to the portion intended for the claimant since the claimant is the 'person entitled to compensation.' "
citation_a.sentence: Corp. of Baltimore v. Sellman, 967 F.2d 971 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 113 S.Ct. 1579, 123 L.Ed.2d 147 (1993) (“Employer’s offset rights [under section 33(g)] are limited to the portion intended for the claimant since the claimant is the ‘person entitled to compensation.’ ”).
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.identifier: 29 F.3d 966, 972
citation_b.parenthetical: in the context of an employer's lien, "[e]m-ployer's offset rights are limited to the portion of the recovery intended for the employee"
citation_b.sentence: See also Brown v. Forest Oil Corp., 29 F.3d 966, 972 (5th Cir.1994) (in the context of an employer’s lien, “[e]m-ployer’s offset rights are limited to the portion of the recovery intended for the employee”).