context: Further, while father may be inconvenienced financially by the order to pay the amount due for the child's past support, we are unable to conclude that an undue hardship or substantial injustice is created merely by enforcing his properly calculated obligation to support his child.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.parenthetical: financial inconvenience caused by a reinstatement of maintenance does not amount to prejudice
citation_a.sentence: See In re Marriage of Nielsen, 794 P.2d 1097 (Colo.App.1990) (deviation from the guideline amount of support is not justified by hardship resulting solely from application of the guideline, absent other unusual or unique financial circumstances); see also In re Marriage of Cargill, 843 P.2d 1335 (Colo.1993) (financial inconvenience caused by a reinstatement of maintenance does not amount to prejudice).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.parenthetical: deviation from the guideline amount of support is not justified by hardship resulting solely from application of the guideline, absent other unusual or unique financial circumstances
citation_b.sentence: See In re Marriage of Nielsen, 794 P.2d 1097 (Colo.App.1990) (deviation from the guideline amount of support is not justified by hardship resulting solely from application of the guideline, absent other unusual or unique financial circumstances); see also In re Marriage of Cargill, 843 P.2d 1335 (Colo.1993) (financial inconvenience caused by a reinstatement of maintenance does not amount to prejudice).