context: Taken as a whole, the instructions and jury forms were not misleading.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 433 P.2d 21, 21
citation_a.parenthetical: finding no prejudicial error in the submission of the jury forms because the jury received correct instructions
citation_a.sentence: See Garcia, 102 Ariz. at 471, 433 P.2d at 21 (finding no prejudicial error in the submission of the jury forms because the jury received correct instructions); cf. State v. Neal, 26 Ariz.App. 423, 425, 549 P.2d 203, 205 (1976) (although the trial court violated the criminal rule requiring it to confer with the parties and inform them of the form of verdict it intends to use, no prejudicial error occurred because the jury received correct instructions).
citation_b.signal: cf.
citation_b.identifier: 26 Ariz.App. 423, 425
citation_b.parenthetical: although the trial court violated the criminal rule requiring it to confer with the parties and inform them of the form of verdict it intends to use, no prejudicial error occurred because the jury received correct instructions
citation_b.sentence: See Garcia, 102 Ariz. at 471, 433 P.2d at 21 (finding no prejudicial error in the submission of the jury forms because the jury received correct instructions); cf. State v. Neal, 26 Ariz.App. 423, 425, 549 P.2d 203, 205 (1976) (although the trial court violated the criminal rule requiring it to confer with the parties and inform them of the form of verdict it intends to use, no prejudicial error occurred because the jury received correct instructions).