context: Furthermore, it was Wife's burden as the movant to establish she was entitled to an award of fees on appeal.' Although Wife, filed a motion alleging Husband was capable of paying Wife's attorney fees, the record reflects no evidence of the parties' financial conditions at the time of the. motion hearing ten months later.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 210 S.W.3d 517, 517
citation_a.parenthetical: noting evidence of financial condition eight months after dissolution should have been presented at hearing on mov-ant's motion for appellate attorney's fees
citation_a.sentence: See also Davis, 210 S.W.3d at 517 (noting evidence of financial condition eight months after dissolution should have been presented at hearing on mov-ant’s motion for appellate attorney’s fees).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 303 S.W.3d 197, 197
citation_b.parenthetical: "[T]he court is to consider the financial resources of the parties since the dissolution, even if the time period between the dissolution' hearing and the appellate Tee hearing is relatively short."
citation_b.sentence: See Potts v. Potts, 303 S.W.3d at 197 (“[T]he court is to consider the financial resources of the parties since the dissolution, even if the time period between the dissolution' hearing and the appellate Tee hearing is relatively short.”).