context: Again based on the limited record before us, Wilford's Sixth Amendment claim may not have merit. Even though Wilford's Sixth Amendment right to counsel had attached to other charges, adversary judicial criminal proceedings may not have been initiated in regard to the charges of this case at the time he was interrogated by law enforcement.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 532 U.S. 162, 167-68
citation_a.parenthetical: holding that "a defendant's statements regarding offenses for which he had not been charged were admissible notwithstanding the attachment of his Sixth Amendment right to counsel on other charged offenses"
citation_a.sentence: See Texas v. Cobb, 532 U.S. 162, 167-68, 121 S.Ct. 1335, 149 L.Ed.2d 321 (2001) (holding that “a defendant’s statements regarding offenses for which he had not been charged were admissible notwithstanding the attachment of his Sixth Amendment right to counsel on other charged offenses”).
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.identifier: 699 So.2d 629, 639
citation_b.parenthetical: stating that "the right to counsel under either the Sixth Amendment or article I, section 16, [Florida Constitution,] is offense-specific"
citation_b.sentence: See also Smith v. State, 699 So.2d 629, 639 (Fla.1997) (stating that “the right to counsel under either the Sixth Amendment or article I, section 16, [Florida Constitution,] is offense-specific”).