context: (Compile 20-23, 26.) Although Fleming claims to have suffered this harassment both at the Woodside Garage and at CPCC, Van Houten's alleged conduct created one hostile work environment because he supervised Fleming throughout both periods.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 23 F.3d 704, 704
citation_a.parenthetical: holding that a hostile work environment continued even after plaintiffs three-year absence because plaintiff "suffered the same kinds of harassment ... under the aegis of some of the same supervisory personnel"
citation_a.sentence: See Cornwell, 23 F.3d at 704 (holding that a hostile work environment continued even after plaintiffs three-year absence because plaintiff “suffered the same kinds of harassment ... under the aegis of some of the same supervisory personnel”); see also Fitzgerald, 251 F.3d at 362-63 (allegations of a “constant stream of unjustified criticisms of [plaintiffs] work described ... a continuity of allegedly unlawful conduct”).
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.identifier: 251 F.3d 362, 362-63
citation_b.parenthetical: allegations of a "constant stream of unjustified criticisms of [plaintiffs] work described ... a continuity of allegedly unlawful conduct"
citation_b.sentence: See Cornwell, 23 F.3d at 704 (holding that a hostile work environment continued even after plaintiffs three-year absence because plaintiff “suffered the same kinds of harassment ... under the aegis of some of the same supervisory personnel”); see also Fitzgerald, 251 F.3d at 362-63 (allegations of a “constant stream of unjustified criticisms of [plaintiffs] work described ... a continuity of allegedly unlawful conduct”).