context: The term "reasonably" indicates that an objective standard should apply. The term "reasonably" is not ambiguous.
citation_a.signal: no signal
citation_a.parenthetical: in context of professional liability insurance policy, the phrase "might be expected to be the basis of a claim or suit" was unambiguous and "perfectly clear"
citation_a.sentence: Phoenix Ins. Co. v. Sukut Constr. Co., 136 Cal.App.3d 673, 186 Cal.Rptr. 513, 514 (1982) (in context of professional liability insurance policy, the phrase “might be expected to be the basis of a claim or suit” was unambiguous and “perfectly clear”); see also Coregis Ins. Co. v. Camico Mut. Ins. Co., 959 F.Supp. 1213, 1222 (C.D.Cal.1997) (“a reasonable person would have foreseen that the conduct alleged ... might form the basis of a claim or suit”).
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.identifier: 959 F.Supp. 1213, 1222
citation_b.parenthetical: "a reasonable person would have foreseen that the conduct alleged ... might form the basis of a claim or suit"
citation_b.sentence: Phoenix Ins. Co. v. Sukut Constr. Co., 136 Cal.App.3d 673, 186 Cal.Rptr. 513, 514 (1982) (in context of professional liability insurance policy, the phrase “might be expected to be the basis of a claim or suit” was unambiguous and “perfectly clear”); see also Coregis Ins. Co. v. Camico Mut. Ins. Co., 959 F.Supp. 1213, 1222 (C.D.Cal.1997) (“a reasonable person would have foreseen that the conduct alleged ... might form the basis of a claim or suit”).