context: One federal circuit extended the Kelly rationale to include federal restitution orders, even though the court recognized that Kelly "was partially influenced by federalism concerns."
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.parenthetical: restitution ordered by federal district court not discharged in Chapter 7 proceeding
citation_a.sentence: United States v. Caddell, 830 F.2d 36, 39 (5th Cir.1987) (restitution order did not illegally require debt- or to divert funds from Chapter 11 estate); see also In re Wright, 87 B.R. 1011, 1015 n. 3 (Bankr.S.D.1988) (restitution ordered by federal district court not discharged in Chapter 7 proceeding); In re O’Connell, 80 B.R. 475, 476 (Bankr.E.D.Mo.1987) (same).
citation_b.signal: no signal
citation_b.identifier: 830 F.2d 36, 39
citation_b.parenthetical: restitution order did not illegally require debt- or to divert funds from Chapter 11 estate
citation_b.sentence: United States v. Caddell, 830 F.2d 36, 39 (5th Cir.1987) (restitution order did not illegally require debt- or to divert funds from Chapter 11 estate); see also In re Wright, 87 B.R. 1011, 1015 n. 3 (Bankr.S.D.1988) (restitution ordered by federal district court not discharged in Chapter 7 proceeding); In re O’Connell, 80 B.R. 475, 476 (Bankr.E.D.Mo.1987) (same).