context: Had his attorney objected to the application of SS 4B1.1, Cabello's sentence would, under the Guidelines, have involved at least 8 years and 11 months less prison time. Such a "significantly less harsh" sentence constitutes the sort of prejudice that supports a Sixth Amendment ineffective-assistance claim based on failure to assure the proper Guideline sentence.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 31 F.3d 529, 534
citation_a.parenthetical: confirming Durrive standard where counsel error led to erroneous Guideline sentence
citation_a.sentence: See Durrive v. United States, 4 F.3d 548, 551 (7th Cir.1993) (setting out standard for ineffective-assistance claims based on counsel’s error at sentencing); see also United States v. Partee, 31 F.3d 529, 534 (7th Cir.1994) (confirming Durrive standard where counsel error led to erroneous Guideline sentence).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 4 F.3d 548, 551
citation_b.parenthetical: setting out standard for ineffective-assistance claims based on counsel's error at sentencing
citation_b.sentence: See Durrive v. United States, 4 F.3d 548, 551 (7th Cir.1993) (setting out standard for ineffective-assistance claims based on counsel’s error at sentencing); see also United States v. Partee, 31 F.3d 529, 534 (7th Cir.1994) (confirming Durrive standard where counsel error led to erroneous Guideline sentence).