context: P14 Probable cause to believe that a man has committed a crime on the street does not necessarily give rise to probable cause to search his home. And an officer's general conclusions about drug dealers' habits are, standing alone, insufficient to justify a search of a suspected drug dealer's home.
citation_a.signal: no signal
citation_a.identifier: 138 Wn.2d 148, 148-49
citation_a.parenthetical: holding that broad generalizations do not alone establish probable cause
citation_a.sentence: Thein, 138 Wn.2d at 148-49 (holding that broad generalizations do not alone establish probable cause); see also State v. Olson, 73 Wn. App. 348, 357, 869 P.2d 110 (1994) (stating “an officer’s belief that persons who cultivate marijuana often keep records and materials in safe houses is not, in our judgment, a sufficient basis for the issuance of a warrant to search a residence of a person connected to the grow operation”).
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.parenthetical: stating "an officer's belief that persons who cultivate marijuana often keep records and materials in safe houses is not, in our judgment, a sufficient basis for the issuance of a warrant to search a residence of a person connected to the grow operation"
citation_b.sentence: Thein, 138 Wn.2d at 148-49 (holding that broad generalizations do not alone establish probable cause); see also State v. Olson, 73 Wn. App. 348, 357, 869 P.2d 110 (1994) (stating “an officer’s belief that persons who cultivate marijuana often keep records and materials in safe houses is not, in our judgment, a sufficient basis for the issuance of a warrant to search a residence of a person connected to the grow operation”).