context: Despite our recognition of the problem of homelessness among veterans, we are not bound by the Secretary's concession when considering whether Ms. Checo's homelessness is an extraordinary circumstance.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 19 Vet.App. 332, 332
citation_a.parenthetical: holding that the Court will "evaluate the evidence presented and determine whether equitable tolling is appropriate on a case-by-case basis"
citation_a.sentence: See Bove, 25 Vet.App. at 140-41 (holding that the 120-day judicial appeal period is not subject to waiver or forfeiture by the Secretary); see also McCreary, 19 Vet.App. at 332 (holding that the Court will “evaluate the evidence presented and determine whether equitable tolling is appropriate on a case-by-case basis”).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 25 Vet.App. 140, 140-41
citation_b.parenthetical: holding that the 120-day judicial appeal period is not subject to waiver or forfeiture by the Secretary
citation_b.sentence: See Bove, 25 Vet.App. at 140-41 (holding that the 120-day judicial appeal period is not subject to waiver or forfeiture by the Secretary); see also McCreary, 19 Vet.App. at 332 (holding that the Court will “evaluate the evidence presented and determine whether equitable tolling is appropriate on a case-by-case basis”).