context: Suffice it to say, Plaintiffs Motion to Strike lacked any colorable basis in the factual record.
citation_a.signal: no signal
citation_a.identifier: 899 F.2d 40, 43-44
citation_a.parenthetical: affirming district court's finding that party "failed to make a reasonable inquiry into the factual basis of the amended complaint" and imposition of Rule 11 sanctions
citation_a.sentence: Hilton Hotels Corp. v. Banov, 899 F.2d 40, 43-44 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (affirming district court’s finding that party “failed to make a reasonable inquiry into the factual basis of the amended complaint” and imposition of Rule 11 sanctions); cf. Marina Mgmt. Services, Inc. v. Vessel My Girls, 202 F.3d 315, 325 (D.C. Cir. 2000) (upholding sanctions for counterclaim “which included allegations not necessarily integrally linked to the legitimacy of the ... action”).
citation_b.signal: cf.
citation_b.identifier: 202 F.3d 315, 325
citation_b.parenthetical: upholding sanctions for counterclaim "which included allegations not necessarily integrally linked to the legitimacy of the ... action"
citation_b.sentence: Hilton Hotels Corp. v. Banov, 899 F.2d 40, 43-44 (D.C. Cir. 1990) (affirming district court’s finding that party “failed to make a reasonable inquiry into the factual basis of the amended complaint” and imposition of Rule 11 sanctions); cf. Marina Mgmt. Services, Inc. v. Vessel My Girls, 202 F.3d 315, 325 (D.C. Cir. 2000) (upholding sanctions for counterclaim “which included allegations not necessarily integrally linked to the legitimacy of the ... action”).