context: Second, there was ample evidence in the records to support the district-court's finding that Herrera oversaw the preparation, purchase and diversion of large quantities of pseudoephedrine through both JDI and G&H.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 60 F.3d 1400, 1410
citation_a.parenthetical: holding that, where "the district court was able to estimate drug quantity, there is no reason to depart from 2D1.1."
citation_a.sentence: See United States v. Ponce, 51 F.3d 820, 827 (9th Cir.1995) (affirming a four-point enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1 where defendant oversaw procurement and distribution of large quantities of cocaine); see also United States v. Basinger, 60 F.3d 1400, 1410 (9th Cir.1995) (holding that, where “the district court was able to estimate drug quantity, there is no reason to depart from 2D1.1.”).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 51 F.3d 820, 827
citation_b.parenthetical: affirming a four-point enhancement under U.S.S.G. SS 3B1.1 where defendant oversaw procurement and distribution of large quantities of cocaine
citation_b.sentence: See United States v. Ponce, 51 F.3d 820, 827 (9th Cir.1995) (affirming a four-point enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1 where defendant oversaw procurement and distribution of large quantities of cocaine); see also United States v. Basinger, 60 F.3d 1400, 1410 (9th Cir.1995) (holding that, where “the district court was able to estimate drug quantity, there is no reason to depart from 2D1.1.”).