context: Second, it was plainly reasonable for defendants to place plaintiff on TB hold, in light of the fact that the condition of his immune system was such that defendants could not place complete confidence in the negative results of his TB test results.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 230 F.Supp.2d 512, 512
citation_a.parenthetical: DOCS's placement of plaintiff on TB hold was reasonable where DOCS was "unable to determine the extent to which Plaintiff pose[d] a risk of contagion"
citation_a.sentence: See Word, 230 F.Supp.2d at 512 (DOCS’s placement of plaintiff on TB hold was reasonable where DOCS was “unable to determine the extent to which Plaintiff pose[d] a risk of contagion”); cf. Reynolds v. Goord, 103 F.Supp.2d 316, 337-38 (S.D.N.Y.2000) (finding it irrational to place on TB hold inmate who refused to submit to PPD testing on religious grounds, where other diagnostic tools to which plaintiff did submit, such as a chest x-ray, sputum testing, and physical examination, indicated that plaintiff was negative for TB).
citation_b.signal: cf.
citation_b.identifier: 103 F.Supp.2d 316, 337-38
citation_b.parenthetical: finding it irrational to place on TB hold inmate who refused to submit to PPD testing on religious grounds, where other diagnostic tools to which plaintiff did submit, such as a chest x-ray, sputum testing, and physical examination, indicated that plaintiff was negative for TB
citation_b.sentence: See Word, 230 F.Supp.2d at 512 (DOCS’s placement of plaintiff on TB hold was reasonable where DOCS was “unable to determine the extent to which Plaintiff pose[d] a risk of contagion”); cf. Reynolds v. Goord, 103 F.Supp.2d 316, 337-38 (S.D.N.Y.2000) (finding it irrational to place on TB hold inmate who refused to submit to PPD testing on religious grounds, where other diagnostic tools to which plaintiff did submit, such as a chest x-ray, sputum testing, and physical examination, indicated that plaintiff was negative for TB).