context: Substantial evidence supports the agency's dispositive conclusion that Perez Herrera failed to establish the government of Mexico was or would be unwilling or unable to control her alleged persecutor.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 399 F.3d 1148, 1154
citation_a.parenthetical: record did not compel finding government unwilling or unable to control private persecutors where police took reports and investigated complaints, though unable to solve crimes
citation_a.sentence: See Castro-Perez v. Gonzales, 409 F.3d 1069, 1072 (9th Cir.2005) (considering country reports and petitioner’s specific case in determining petitioner failed to establish the government was unable or unwilling to control persecutors); see also Nahrvani v. Gonzales, 399 F.3d 1148, 1154 (9th Cir.2005) (record did not compel finding government unwilling or unable to control private persecutors where police took reports and investigated complaints, though unable to solve crimes).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 409 F.3d 1069, 1072
citation_b.parenthetical: considering country reports and petitioner's specific case in determining petitioner failed to establish the government was unable or unwilling to control persecutors
citation_b.sentence: See Castro-Perez v. Gonzales, 409 F.3d 1069, 1072 (9th Cir.2005) (considering country reports and petitioner’s specific case in determining petitioner failed to establish the government was unable or unwilling to control persecutors); see also Nahrvani v. Gonzales, 399 F.3d 1148, 1154 (9th Cir.2005) (record did not compel finding government unwilling or unable to control private persecutors where police took reports and investigated complaints, though unable to solve crimes).