context: Detective Collins testified that Hodge's drug business in Virginia was related to the New York sales in that Collins "had received information that .... Hodge was selling cocaine on the Eastern Seaboard from Upstate New York to Virginia, as well as North Carolina, transporting cocaine."
citation_a.signal: no signal
citation_a.identifier: 975 F.2d 1016, 1019
citation_a.parenthetical: explaining that at sentencing district court may consider reliable hearsay in determining drug quantity
citation_a.sentence: Id. at 433. This evidence, taken together, constituted a strong showing of regularity. Cf. United States v. Uwaeme, 975 F.2d 1016, 1019 (4th Cir.1992) (explaining that at sentencing district court may consider reliable hearsay in determining drug quantity).
citation_b.signal: but see
citation_b.identifier: 960 F.2d 903, 911
citation_b.parenthetical: stating without explanation that "[w]hen regularity is to provide most of the foundation for temporally remote, relevant conduct, specific repeated events outside the offense of conviction must be identified"
citation_b.sentence: But see United States v. Hahn, 960 F.2d 903, 911 (9th Cir.1992) (stating without explanation that “[w]hen regularity is to provide most of the foundation for temporally remote, relevant conduct, specific repeated events outside the offense of conviction must be identified”).