context: We find that Defendants' convictions for conspiracy to distribute heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. SSSS 841(b)(1)(C), 846, and conspiracy to defraud the United States or commit any offense against the United States (la, provide and possess contraband in prison), in violation of 18 U.S.C. SS 371, although both stemming from the same events, were not the same offense for double jeopardy purposes.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 128 F.3d 1254, 1257-58
citation_a.parenthetical: holding that convictions under SSSS 846 and 371 do not offend the Double Jeopardy Clause
citation_a.sentence: See Albernaz v. United States, 450 U.S. 333, 344 n. 3, 101 S.Ct. 1137, 67 L.Ed.2d 275 (1981) (recognizing that a single conspiracy “can give rise to distinct offenses under separate statutes without violating the Double Jeopardy Clause”); see also United States v. Holloway, 128 F.3d 1254, 1257-58 (8th Cir.1997) (holding that convictions under §§ 846 and 371 do not offend the Double Jeopardy Clause).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.parenthetical: recognizing that a single conspiracy "can give rise to distinct offenses under separate statutes without violating the Double Jeopardy Clause"
citation_b.sentence: See Albernaz v. United States, 450 U.S. 333, 344 n. 3, 101 S.Ct. 1137, 67 L.Ed.2d 275 (1981) (recognizing that a single conspiracy “can give rise to distinct offenses under separate statutes without violating the Double Jeopardy Clause”); see also United States v. Holloway, 128 F.3d 1254, 1257-58 (8th Cir.1997) (holding that convictions under §§ 846 and 371 do not offend the Double Jeopardy Clause).