context: Given these circumstances, there is no reasonable probability that trial counsel's failure to object to the admission of the sentencing sheets had any impact on the jury's verdict.
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 279 Ga. 522, 527
citation_a.parenthetical: admission of defendant's prior convictions was harmless in light of defendant's admissions during his testimony before the State brought up his convictions
citation_a.sentence: See also Hoffler v. State, 292 Ga. 537, 540 (2) (739 SE2d 362) (2013) (admission of prior conviction to impeach witness was harmless, where witness “made an unsolicited reference to his ‘rap sheet’ ” during his testimony and thus there was “other evidence before the jury of [the witness’s] criminal record”); Harris v. State, 279 Ga. 522, 527 (5) (615 SE2d 532) (2005) (admission of defendant’s prior convictions was harmless in light of defendant’s admissions during his testimony before the State brought up his convictions).
citation_b.signal: see
citation_b.identifier: 292 Ga. App. 560, 563-564
citation_b.parenthetical: trial counsel's failure to object to admission on cross-examination of sentencing sheets as part of prior convictions was not prejudicial, where defendant already admitted to the prior convictions on direct examination
citation_b.sentence: See Daniel v. State, 292 Ga. App. 560, 563-564 (4) (a) (665 SE2d 696) (2008) (trial counsel’s failure to object to admission on cross-examination of sentencing sheets as part of prior convictions was not prejudicial, where defendant already admitted to the prior convictions on direct examination).