context: Because the Eleventh Circuit has not decided the issue, the Undersigned's task is to predict how the Eleventh Circuit would rule if presented with the identical issue of successor liability. Chao v. Concrete Mgt.
citation_a.signal: cf.
citation_a.identifier: 355 F.Supp.2d 1317, 1328
citation_a.parenthetical: concluding that the Eleventh Circuit would "likely follow" a line of authority
citation_a.sentence: Cf. United States v. Stickle, 355 F.Supp.2d 1317, 1328 (S.D.Fla.2004) (concluding that the Eleventh Circuit would "likely follow” a line of authority).
citation_b.signal: no signal
citation_b.identifier: 2009 WL 564381, at *3
citation_b.parenthetical: predicting that the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals would conclude that successor liability exists under the FLSA
citation_b.sentence: Res., L.L.C., No. 08-2501-JWL, 2009 WL 564381, at *3 (D.Kan. Mar. 5, 2009) (predicting that the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals would conclude that successor liability exists under the FLSA).