context: Indeed, had the Defendants miscalculated the duration of Ford's supervised release and requested arrest warrants be issued, but not arrested and detained Ford, Ford's Amended Complaint suggests that he would not have suffered any damage. For these reasons, Ford's damages arise out of his false arrest and/or false imprisonment, not the alleged negligent actions of the USPC and CSOSA Defendants.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 947 F.2d 1507, 1507
citation_a.parenthetical: concluding that plaintiffs claims, though couched in terms of negligence, sounded in defamation and were therefore barred under FTCA
citation_a.sentence: See Kugel, 947 F.2d at 1507 (concluding that plaintiffs claims, though couched in terms of negligence, sounded in defamation and were therefore barred under FTCA); see also Snow-Erlin, 470 F.3d at 809 (holding that plaintiff could not sidestep the FTCA’s exclusion of false imprisonment claims by suing for the damage of false imprisonment under the label of negligence). Accordingly, the Court finds that Ford’s claims under the FTCA arise out of false arrest and false imprisonment.
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.identifier: 470 F.3d 809, 809
citation_b.parenthetical: holding that plaintiff could not sidestep the FTCA's exclusion of false imprisonment claims by suing for the damage of false imprisonment under the label of negligence
citation_b.sentence: See Kugel, 947 F.2d at 1507 (concluding that plaintiffs claims, though couched in terms of negligence, sounded in defamation and were therefore barred under FTCA); see also Snow-Erlin, 470 F.3d at 809 (holding that plaintiff could not sidestep the FTCA’s exclusion of false imprisonment claims by suing for the damage of false imprisonment under the label of negligence). Accordingly, the Court finds that Ford’s claims under the FTCA arise out of false arrest and false imprisonment.