context: The government failed to establish that Garcia had any knowledge of the hidden compartment in the Altima.
citation_a.signal: see
citation_a.identifier: 554 F.2d 179, 186
citation_a.parenthetical: stating that "[t]he weakness lies in the circumstance that the evidence shows no contemporaneous knowledge or intent" during the prior act
citation_a.sentence: See United States v. Greenfield, 554 F.2d 179, 186 (5th Cir.1977) (stating that “[t]he weakness lies in the circumstance that the evidence shows no contemporaneous knowledge or intent” during the prior act); see also Jimenez, 613 F.2d at 1376 (finding extrinsic evidence of prior possession where defendant denied knowledge of possession should not have been admitted because under the circumstances, “no reasonable jury could have found appellant guilty of the alleged cocaine possession”).
citation_b.signal: see also
citation_b.identifier: 613 F.2d 1376, 1376
citation_b.parenthetical: finding extrinsic evidence of prior possession where defendant denied knowledge of possession should not have been admitted because under the circumstances, "no reasonable jury could have found appellant guilty of the alleged cocaine possession"
citation_b.sentence: See United States v. Greenfield, 554 F.2d 179, 186 (5th Cir.1977) (stating that “[t]he weakness lies in the circumstance that the evidence shows no contemporaneous knowledge or intent” during the prior act); see also Jimenez, 613 F.2d at 1376 (finding extrinsic evidence of prior possession where defendant denied knowledge of possession should not have been admitted because under the circumstances, “no reasonable jury could have found appellant guilty of the alleged cocaine possession”).