context: Trademark standards do not traverse international borders. "The concept of territoriality is basic to trademark law; trademark rights exist in each country solely according to that country's statutory scheme."
citation_a.signal: see also
citation_a.identifier: 234 F.2d 633, 639
citation_a.parenthetical: "[W]hen trade-mark rights within the United States are being litigated in an American court, the decisions of foreign courts concerning the respective trademark rights of the parties are irrelevant and inadmissible."
citation_a.sentence: Fuji Photo, 754 F.2d at 599 (finding it “error to admit evidence of the parties’ foreign trademark practices”); see also E. Remy Martin & Co. v. Shaw-Ross Int’l Imports, Inc., 756 F.2d 1525, 1531 (11th Cir.1985) (district court erred in considering status of parties’ marks in France; “Our concern must be the business and goodwill attached to United States trademarks, not French trademark rights under French law.”) (quotation omitted); Vanity Fair Mills v. T. Eaton Co., 234 F.2d 633, 639 (2d Cir.1956) (“[W]hen trade-mark rights within the United States are being litigated in an American court, the decisions of foreign courts concerning the respective trademark rights of the parties are irrelevant and inadmissible.”).
citation_b.signal: no signal
citation_b.identifier: 754 F.2d 599, 599
citation_b.parenthetical: finding it "error to admit evidence of the parties' foreign trademark practices"
citation_b.sentence: Fuji Photo, 754 F.2d at 599 (finding it “error to admit evidence of the parties’ foreign trademark practices”); see also E. Remy Martin & Co. v. Shaw-Ross Int’l Imports, Inc., 756 F.2d 1525, 1531 (11th Cir.1985) (district court erred in considering status of parties’ marks in France; “Our concern must be the business and goodwill attached to United States trademarks, not French trademark rights under French law.”) (quotation omitted); Vanity Fair Mills v. T. Eaton Co., 234 F.2d 633, 639 (2d Cir.1956) (“[W]hen trade-mark rights within the United States are being litigated in an American court, the decisions of foreign courts concerning the respective trademark rights of the parties are irrelevant and inadmissible.”).