<blockquote>
  <p>Should I get a digital SLR video camera, or a camcorder, or something else?</p>
</blockquote>

<p>It depends on your planned usage. Canon and I <em>think</em> Nikon DSLRs are still limited to recording up to 4GiB of footage, and then they stop. This works out to roughly 15-20 minutes of footage per shot, depending on bitrate (which will be influences by shooting modes and the amount of motion in a shot). Some mirrorless cameras, including the Panasonic Lumix series and the Sony Alpha series, feature shooting modes that can record for as long as they have power. So if you're going to have a dedicated camera operator, or plan on primarily shooting everything in quick, small shots, a DSLR might work out, otherwise look at cameras that use AVCHD, XAVC, or some similar system to overcome clip length.</p>

<p>DSLRs and mirrorless cameras also typically do not have servo-controlled zoom mechanisms, so any zoom changes will need to be done by hand, and if you're planning on shooting any of these zooms they may look unsteady if you don't use some kind of additional hardware to smooth things out. On the other hand, that means you can do things like snap-zooms if you so wish.</p>

<p>The other thing of concern is rolling shutter. DSLRs use a CMOS sensor which is better for still photography, while camcorders use CCDs, which are better for video. The problem with CMOS sensors is that while they are cheaper than CCDs, they don't have what's called a "global shutter," and each imaging line is scanned individually, which produces a rolling shutter effect (AKA: Jello-vision) when there is a lot of horizontal movement. Most modern DSLRs have this tamped down to a reasonable level, but it's still something to look out for when choosing a camera.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Should I try or try not to couple my audio and video?</p>
</blockquote>

<p>You should keep the two separate, if possible, and not mix in the field. Or if you do mix in the field make sure you have an isolated recording. Mixing in post will give you the maximum amount of flexibility and will reduce the amount of opportunities for things to be screwed up on accident, which would necessitate a reshoot.</p>

<p>If you don't want to synch by hand you could look into <a href="https://www.redgiant.com/products/pluraleyes/" rel="nofollow noreferrer">Red Giant's PluralEyes</a> and have it do the synching for you, just make sure you're recording some kind of audio on the camera.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Do I really need lighting equipment? I see people producing tolerable youtube vlogs with what seems to be minimal equipment.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Generally speaking, yes, you should have some kind of lighting setup. The more light you can throw on a subject the better, and you should definitely have one if you are going to be shooting in different environments so you can make sure you always have sufficient light.</p>

<p>For a typical interview a three-point lighting setup is recommended, and thankfully with LEDs becoming cheaper you can often find some small, cheap, light lighting kits that don't produce ten tons of heat. You can also experiment with different kinds of cheap lighting to suit your needs, like getting a cheap utility light from the hardware store and throwing a bunch of diffusion on it to soften the harshness.</p>

<p>I would also recommend getting some sort of bounce board to help better control your lighting. You can use colored boards to add a subtle "look" to your video (using a gold bounce board is common to help give a shot a warmer look), to soften shadows, or as a flag to control where your light is being thrown to reduce glare, lens flares, and reflections. There are nice ones that are very portable, alternatively get some cheap foam core from the local office supply shop.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>Are there certain cameras that are betting with not great internal lighting than others?</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Yes. A camera's light sensitivity is, generally speaking, governed by the size of its imaging sensor. The bigger the sensor the more light can be focused on it. Professional camcorders use sensors that are two thirds of an inch (measured diagonally), while a lot of consumer camcorders use sensors that are only one third of an inch. In DSLRs and mirrorless cameras the size can be almost anything. It could be as small as 0.85 inches, as in Micro Four Thirds, all the way up to just over an inch in the case of Canon APC-S sized sensors.</p>

<p>Also different sensor manufacturers may do better or worse in terms of performance at the same light level. For example the low light performance of the Sony A7s II is way beyond anything Panasonic can deliver at that size.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>What is the best way to record the music that the instructors will be demoing to?</p>
</blockquote>

<p>Add it in post. This will give you maximum flexibility to keep the levels constant. You can use recording from the onboard camera mic(s) to synchronize it to the music. I've never tested it, but PluralEyes may actually be able to do that for you too.</p>

<blockquote>
  <p>What am I overlooking? This world is new to me, but I'm excited about entering it.</p>
</blockquote>

<p>A good tripod. If you plan on doing any tilting or panning or any of that jazz you want to make sure you get a tripod with a fluid head. You may also want to consider some kind of shock resistance system if you're going to be shooting on floors that have a lot of flex to them.</p>

<p>If you anticipate a lot of moving around you should consider maybe a monopod (monopods can also be used as a jib if you're willing to risk it), or, if you plan to be shooting while you move the camera, maybe a Steadicam rig or some kind of gimbal. There's a ton of guides out there on how to make your own Steadicam-like system, and most of the time they're pretty inexpensive to build.</p>

<p>You should also consider lenses if you're buying a camera with interchangeable lenses. The lenses included in basic kits aren't bad, but you may find them somewhat limiting, such as a limited "zoom" range, or it doesn't open up wide enough. You may want to consider adapting different kinds of lenses to it, but keep in mind lenses with electronically controlled focus and aperture may require some kind of powered adapter (one brand is SpeedBooster by Metabones), and those can get kind of expensive. Sometimes you can get away with just using a non-electrified adapters can also be used, and are very cheap, but you will not get autofocus, and you might not have control over the aperture.</p>

<p>When shooting it's strongly recommended <em>not</em> to use auto-focus or auto-exposure, or for that matter any other automatic controls. The results are almost never as good as doing it yourself, and the systems are easily bamboozled. Before you shoot, and after every time your lighting changes, you should re-white balance your camera using a clean white sheet of paper being held exactly where the talent will be standing.</p>

<p>Don't get caught up in the whole 4K/UHD thing. Distribution of 4K isn't quite "there" yet, and there isn't a ton of demand for it outside of enthusiast circles. It does give you some flexibility in post production, however, to punch in closer or for image stabilization, plus additional color detail when downscaling, but I wouldn't rule out a camera because it <em>doesn't</em> shoot 4K/UHD.</p>

<p>Focus a lot on sound. Microphones will pick up all sorts of extraneous noises you don't hear, like the sound of HVAC systems circulating air, or the hum of a refrigerator's compressor. You should have your sound engineer listen for these things and make sure they speak up if there's a problem with the audio. Don't be afraid to do things like post signs outside telling people you're shooting, and unplugging appliances (a fridge will keep cool for however long you're shooting).</p>

<ul>
<li>Always shoot some test footage and have your talent test your microphones.</li>
<li>Always arrive early</li>
<li>Never stop your audio recorder if the camera is still running</li>
<li>Always run the camera a little longer than you think you need to, you can trim the slop in edit.</li>
<li>Make sure your talent stops and holds position when they're done doing whatever it is they're doing. This gives you more flexibility in post.</li>
<li>Use your audio meters to ensure your audio is mixed to around the same level, but don't "ride the levels" and be too fine grained</li>
<li>Don't go too extreme with your color grading</li>
</ul>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-04-24T18:33:24.073Z
2017-04-24T18:33:24.073Z
ivkowalenko
<p>To answer your questions:</p>

<p>1) A DSLR is fine for a first try out. As an acquisition format (not delivery), HD is on its way out very fast though. The rage these days in 2K or actually 4K. So, later or now, look into, getting a camera that does that. For a DSLR price-range and for a person who is not used to shooting video, I'd recommend the GH5 that just came out.</p>

<p>2) If you use a DSLR-like camera, use an external recorder, and sync the audio and the video later, in your editing program. This will give you more flexibility and better quality, for sure.</p>

<p>3) Look for cameras that work well in low-light conditions. DSLRs work rather well generally. And yes, if you are moving a lot, stay away from cumbersome equipment: you'll be exhausted before you've shot one image. Have with you a case of 650W lights perhaps, with their stand and a couple of sand bags and extension cables. These are versatile and can enhance your image nicely.</p>

<p>4) As regards the music, best would be to digital-feed it into a recorder and record on-set ambiance as well, on top of miking your talent. So yes, that's a lot. Short of that, I'd mike the talent and record on-set audio. You can add the music later in post and mix the on-set ambiance with it. </p>

<p>5) </p>

<ul>
<li>Aim to get good footage and very good audio. So, when you visit a
location, look and listen: if it looks good, it might not sound good,
and vice versa.</li>
<li>If, while you're shooting, you start to hear sounds coming from outside the venue, stop the shoot and try to stop the sounds from
happening. Why? 'Cause you want your footage and production audio to
be as good as possible the first time around. It can be very hard to
save bad footage or bad audio later on, in post. So get it right the
first time, while keeping an eye on the clock, the budget, etc.</li>
<li>In post, use filters to clean up your audio tracks, like the iZotope RX programs.</li>
<li>Test your gear before you show up on set. Make sure you know what you're doing with it, so as not to waste your time and your talents'.</li>
<li>Have at least one assistant with you on each shoot, either hired on the spot, or someone who travels with you. You don't want to overextend yourself too much, particularly since you're starting out. You don't want to do everything poorly and later become disillusioned with the process. It's not easy ... but it can be rewarding.</li>
</ul>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-03-24T14:01:22.267Z
2017-03-24T14:01:22.267Z
CyanideBaby
<p>I'm gathering equipment for a "mobile recording studio" focusing on dance instruction. I'm pretty much a novice at this and my budget, while not shoestring, is pretty small. I'm not aiming for very high production quality, but something like youtube tutorial quality is fine for me at this point. </p>

<p>These are the things that I know I'll need:</p>

<ul>
<li>Video Camera (just one to start)</li>
<li>Mics for instructors (wireless)</li>
<li>Mics for ambient sound</li>
</ul>

<p>These are things that I may need (or think I will) depending on what type of setup I choose:</p>

<ul>
<li>Audio mixer</li>
<li>Handheld audio recorder</li>
<li>lighting</li>
</ul>

<p>My question is about the best way to set this up. And the following info briefly describes the situations I'm likely to record in: I'll be indoors, near power sources. The dance instructors will be no more than 20 feet from the camera.</p>

<p>So my questions are:</p>

<p>1) Should I get a digital SLR video camera, or a camcorder, or something else? Camcorders seem to have more ports for connecting things, and seem to have more options for audio. I'm not really sure the pros / cons here, except camcorders seem more expensive, DSLRs also take photos, and share lenses with photography work.</p>

<p>2) Should I try or try not to couple my audio and video? That is should I use a handheld recorder (I won't be moving or outside) and record multiple tracks to that (this will complicate post production but allow more freedom to alter track characteristics independently) or should I use a mixer that feeds into my camera and record the audio with the video (I like the simplicity of this and can tolerate the loss of freedom). I'm not sure.</p>

<p>3) Do I really need lighting equipment? I see people producing tolerable youtube vlogs with what seems to be minimal equipment. I plan to be on the road filming, and I'd rather not have to bring lighting with me, or bother renting. Are there certain cameras that are betting with not great internal lighting than others?</p>

<p>4) What is the best way to record the music that the instructors will be demoing to? I guess my major options are adding the music in post, a digital feed into the audio mix, or actually miking the audio source itself (speakers).</p>

<p>5) What am I overlooking? This world is new to me, but I'm excited about entering it. I realize my questions here are attempts to understand what I need, and may not even be able to recognize questions I should be asking because of my lack of experience/knowledge.</p>

<p>If I were to buy this setup today (I'm going to wait a bit) I would probably get:</p>

<ul>
<li>Mid-range Canon DSLR (D70?)</li>
<li>2 mid-quality lav mics that allow the receiver to use AC power</li>
<li>1 average cardioid condenser mic for ambient sound / music</li>
<li>a 4 channel mixer that will feed into the camera audio in</li>
<li>headphones to listen to the mix while I record</li>
</ul>

<p>I realize there's a lot of questions here but I'm out of my depth. Perhaps there are kind souls out there who would like to help steer me in the right direction. </p>

<p>Thanks in advance. </p>

<video-recording><camera><audio-recording><microphone>
What equipment do I needed for filming dance instruction?
pixelearth
# What equipment do I needed for filming dance instruction?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2017-03-23)

I'm gathering equipment for a "mobile recording studio" focusing on dance instruction. I'm pretty much a novice at this and my budget, while not shoestring, is pretty small. I'm not aiming for very high production quality, but something like youtube tutorial quality is fine for me at this point.

These are the things that I know I'll need:

* Video Camera (just one to start)
* Mics for instructors (wireless)
* Mics for ambient sound

These are things that I may need (or think I will) depending on what type of setup I choose:

* Audio mixer
* Handheld audio recorder
* lighting

My question is about the best way to set this up. And the following info briefly describes the situations I'm likely to record in: I'll be indoors, near power sources. The dance instructors will be no more than 20 feet from the camera.

So my questions are:

1) Should I get a digital SLR video camera, or a camcorder, or something else? Camcorders seem to have more ports for connecting things, and seem to have more options for audio. I'm not really sure the pros / cons here, except camcorders seem more expensive, DSLRs also take photos, and share lenses with photography work.

2) Should I try or try not to couple my audio and video? That is should I use a handheld recorder (I won't be moving or outside) and record multiple tracks to that (this will complicate post production but allow more freedom to alter track characteristics independently) or should I use a mixer that feeds into my camera and record the audio with the video (I like the simplicity of this and can tolerate the loss of freedom). I'm not sure.

3) Do I really need lighting equipment? I see people producing tolerable youtube vlogs with what seems to be minimal equipment. I plan to be on the road filming, and I'd rather not have to bring lighting with me, or bother renting. Are there certain cameras that are betting with not great internal lighting than others?

4) What is the best way to record the music that the instructors will be demoing to? I guess my major options are adding the music in post, a digital feed into the audio mix, or actually miking the audio source itself (speakers).

5) What am I overlooking? This world is new to me, but I'm excited about entering it. I realize my questions here are attempts to understand what I need, and may not even be able to recognize questions I should be asking because of my lack of experience/knowledge.

If I were to buy this setup today (I'm going to wait a bit) I would probably get:

* Mid-range Canon DSLR (D70?)
* 2 mid-quality lav mics that allow the receiver to use AC power
* 1 average cardioid condenser mic for ambient sound / music
* a 4 channel mixer that will feed into the camera audio in
* headphones to listen to the mix while I record

I realize there's a lot of questions here but I'm out of my depth. Perhaps there are kind souls out there who would like to help steer me in the right direction.

Thanks in advance.

**Tags:** video-recording, camera, audio-recording, microphone


---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2017-04-24. Score: 1

> Should I get a digital SLR video camera, or a camcorder, or something else?

It depends on your planned usage. Canon and I *think* Nikon DSLRs are still limited to recording up to 4GiB of footage, and then they stop. This works out to roughly 15-20 minutes of footage per shot, depending on bitrate (which will be influences by shooting modes and the amount of motion in a shot). Some mirrorless cameras, including the Panasonic Lumix series and the Sony Alpha series, feature shooting modes that can record for as long as they have power. So if you're going to have a dedicated camera operator, or plan on primarily shooting everything in quick, small shots, a DSLR might work out, otherwise look at cameras that use AVCHD, XAVC, or some similar system to overcome clip length.

DSLRs and mirrorless cameras also typically do not have servo-controlled zoom mechanisms, so any zoom changes will need to be done by hand, and if you're planning on shooting any of these zooms they may look unsteady if you don't use some kind of additional hardware to smooth things out. On the other hand, that means you can do things like snap-zooms if you so wish.

The other thing of concern is rolling shutter. DSLRs use a CMOS sensor which is better for still photography, while camcorders use CCDs, which are better for video. The problem with CMOS sensors is that while they are cheaper than CCDs, they don't have what's called a "global shutter," and each imaging line is scanned individually, which produces a rolling shutter effect (AKA: Jello-vision) when there is a lot of horizontal movement. Most modern DSLRs have this tamped down to a reasonable level, but it's still something to look out for when choosing a camera.

> Should I try or try not to couple my audio and video?

You should keep the two separate, if possible, and not mix in the field. Or if you do mix in the field make sure you have an isolated recording. Mixing in post will give you the maximum amount of flexibility and will reduce the amount of opportunities for things to be screwed up on accident, which would necessitate a reshoot.

If you don't want to synch by hand you could look into [Red Giant's PluralEyes](https://www.redgiant.com/products/pluraleyes/) and have it do the synching for you, just make sure you're recording some kind of audio on the camera.

> Do I really need lighting equipment? I see people producing tolerable youtube vlogs with what seems to be minimal equipment.

Generally speaking, yes, you should have some kind of lighting setup. The more light you can throw on a subject the better, and you should definitely have one if you are going to be shooting in different environments so you can make sure you always have sufficient light.

For a typical interview a three-point lighting setup is recommended, and thankfully with LEDs becoming cheaper you can often find some small, cheap, light lighting kits that don't produce ten tons of heat. You can also experiment with different kinds of cheap lighting to suit your needs, like getting a cheap utility light from the hardware store and throwing a bunch of diffusion on it to soften the harshness.

I would also recommend getting some sort of bounce board to help better control your lighting. You can use colored boards to add a subtle "look" to your video (using a gold bounce board is common to help give a shot a warmer look), to soften shadows, or as a flag to control where your light is being thrown to reduce glare, lens flares, and reflections. There are nice ones that are very portable, alternatively get some cheap foam core from the local office supply shop.

> Are there certain cameras that are betting with not great internal lighting than others?

Yes. A camera's light sensitivity is, generally speaking, governed by the size of its imaging sensor. The bigger the sensor the more light can be focused on it. Professional camcorders use sensors that are two thirds of an inch (measured diagonally), while a lot of consumer camcorders use sensors that are only one third of an inch. In DSLRs and mirrorless cameras the size can be almost anything. It could be as small as 0.85 inches, as in Micro Four Thirds, all the way up to just over an inch in the case of Canon APC-S sized sensors.

Also different sensor manufacturers may do better or worse in terms of performance at the same light level. For example the low light performance of the Sony A7s II is way beyond anything Panasonic can deliver at that size.

> What is the best way to record the music that the instructors will be demoing to?

Add it in post. This will give you maximum flexibility to keep the levels constant. You can use recording from the onboard camera mic(s) to synchronize it to the music. I've never tested it, but PluralEyes may actually be able to do that for you too.

> What am I overlooking? This world is new to me, but I'm excited about entering it.

A good tripod. If you plan on doing any tilting or panning or any of that jazz you want to make sure you get a tripod with a fluid head. You may also want to consider some kind of shock resistance system if you're going to be shooting on floors that have a lot of flex to them.

If you anticipate a lot of moving around you should consider maybe a monopod (monopods can also be used as a jib if you're willing to risk it), or, if you plan to be shooting while you move the camera, maybe a Steadicam rig or some kind of gimbal. There's a ton of guides out there on how to make your own Steadicam-like system, and most of the time they're pretty inexpensive to build.

You should also consider lenses if you're buying a camera with interchangeable lenses. The lenses included in basic kits aren't bad, but you may find them somewhat limiting, such as a limited "zoom" range, or it doesn't open up wide enough. You may want to consider adapting different kinds of lenses to it, but keep in mind lenses with electronically controlled focus and aperture may require some kind of powered adapter (one brand is SpeedBooster by Metabones), and those can get kind of expensive. Sometimes you can get away with just using a non-electrified adapters can also be used, and are very cheap, but you will not get autofocus, and you might not have control over the aperture.

When shooting it's strongly recommended *not* to use auto-focus or auto-exposure, or for that matter any other automatic controls. The results are almost never as good as doing it yourself, and the systems are easily bamboozled. Before you shoot, and after every time your lighting changes, you should re-white balance your camera using a clean white sheet of paper being held exactly where the talent will be standing.

Don't get caught up in the whole 4K/UHD thing. Distribution of 4K isn't quite "there" yet, and there isn't a ton of demand for it outside of enthusiast circles. It does give you some flexibility in post production, however, to punch in closer or for image stabilization, plus additional color detail when downscaling, but I wouldn't rule out a camera because it *doesn't* shoot 4K/UHD.

Focus a lot on sound. Microphones will pick up all sorts of extraneous noises you don't hear, like the sound of HVAC systems circulating air, or the hum of a refrigerator's compressor. You should have your sound engineer listen for these things and make sure they speak up if there's a problem with the audio. Don't be afraid to do things like post signs outside telling people you're shooting, and unplugging appliances (a fridge will keep cool for however long you're shooting).

* Always shoot some test footage and have your talent test your microphones.
* Always arrive early
* Never stop your audio recorder if the camera is still running
* Always run the camera a little longer than you think you need to, you can trim the slop in edit.
* Make sure your talent stops and holds position when they're done doing whatever it is they're doing. This gives you more flexibility in post.
* Use your audio meters to ensure your audio is mixed to around the same level, but don't "ride the levels" and be too fine grained
* Don't go too extreme with your color grading


---

### Answer by username_2 on 2017-03-24. Score: 1

To answer your questions:

1) A DSLR is fine for a first try out. As an acquisition format (not delivery), HD is on its way out very fast though. The rage these days in 2K or actually 4K. So, later or now, look into, getting a camera that does that. For a DSLR price-range and for a person who is not used to shooting video, I'd recommend the GH5 that just came out.

2) If you use a DSLR-like camera, use an external recorder, and sync the audio and the video later, in your editing program. This will give you more flexibility and better quality, for sure.

3) Look for cameras that work well in low-light conditions. DSLRs work rather well generally. And yes, if you are moving a lot, stay away from cumbersome equipment: you'll be exhausted before you've shot one image. Have with you a case of 650W lights perhaps, with their stand and a couple of sand bags and extension cables. These are versatile and can enhance your image nicely.

4) As regards the music, best would be to digital-feed it into a recorder and record on-set ambiance as well, on top of miking your talent. So yes, that's a lot. Short of that, I'd mike the talent and record on-set audio. You can add the music later in post and mix the on-set ambiance with it.

5)

* Aim to get good footage and very good audio. So, when you visit a
  location, look and listen: if it looks good, it might not sound good,
  and vice versa.
* If, while you're shooting, you start to hear sounds coming from outside the venue, stop the shoot and try to stop the sounds from
  happening. Why? 'Cause you want your footage and production audio to
  be as good as possible the first time around. It can be very hard to
  save bad footage or bad audio later on, in post. So get it right the
  first time, while keeping an eye on the clock, the budget, etc.
* In post, use filters to clean up your audio tracks, like the iZotope RX programs.
* Test your gear before you show up on set. Make sure you know what you're doing with it, so as not to waste your time and your talents'.
* Have at least one assistant with you on each shoot, either hired on the spot, or someone who travels with you. You don't want to overextend yourself too much, particularly since you're starting out. You don't want to do everything poorly and later become disillusioned with the process. It's not easy ... but it can be rewarding.


---

