<p>So here is what I found out, if anyone's interested (however unlikely this might be, considering the poor popularity of that question ! :)) :<br>
– Scorp Video Thumbnails Maker gets the colors right for Bt.709 footage with its “Engine 2” rendering module (not the other three with the current 11.0.0.3 version) and the CCCP codec pack. I created <a href="http://www.suu-design.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&amp;t=1893" rel="nofollow noreferrer">a thread about that issue on the support forum for that tool</a>.<br>
– I managed to tweak VCSI by adding <code>"-vf", "zscale=matrixin=709:matrix=709,format=rgb24",</code> to each <code>ffmpeg</code> call, so that it preserves Bt.709 colors; it's still slower and less convenient than Scorp VTM (and that modified script won't get accurate colors for Bt.601 footage so both versions would have to be installed and used accordingly), but it's free.<br>
– Since I created this thread I found a few other tools which can perform this task : StaxRip (which has an internal thumbnails preview generation module, in addition to the older MTN), PotPlayer, BSPlayer, Auto Movie Thumbnailer. The latter is based on MPlayer, and is supposed to give control over the rendering engine, but I couldn't get it to use Bt.709. Otherwise it's a good free dedicated GUI alternative to Scorp Movie Thumbnails Maker, with many customization options.</p>

<p>I also created <a href="https://forum.videohelp.com/threads/390691-Generating-video-thumbnails-preview-contact-sheet-in-batch-color-issue" rel="nofollow noreferrer">a thread on VideoHelp regarding that specific issue</a>, and <a href="https://forum.videohelp.com/threads/390710-Screenshots-and-respect-of-the-YUV-RGB-colorspace-conversion" rel="nofollow noreferrer">another about the color accuracy of screenshots in general</a>.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2018-11-24T18:44:53.187Z
2018-11-24T18:44:53.187Z
GabrielB
<p>I have a large collection of videos to sort out, and for that purpose I want to create a thumbnail preview for each one of them, as quickly and efficiently as possible. I have tested several tools which have that capacity, with a varying degree of satisfaction.</p>

<ul>
<li>Media Player Classic : Does not allow command line interaction or batch directory processing. The presentation of timestamps and other informations is good enough as it is, but not customizable. The aspect of the screenshots, as I found out, depends upon the settings of the graphic driver : whether there are “enhancements” active or disabled, or whether the entry levels are set to full range or restricted range. With the default “restricted range”, the picture appears more vivid, with more contrast, but the blacks are crushed and the highlights are blown ; with entry levels set to “full range”, the picture is rather dull, with slightly faded / washed-out colors, similar to the representation of the other tools below.</li>
</ul>

<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/ihwwe.jpg" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/ihwwe.jpg" alt="MPC-HC default graphic settings"></a>
{default graphic settings}
<a href="https://i.sstatic.net/Vg0IV.jpg" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/Vg0IV.jpg" alt="MPC-HC “full range” in Intel graphic settings"></a>
{“full range” in Intel graphic settings}
<a href="https://i.sstatic.net/dgUc4.jpg" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/dgUc4.jpg" alt="MPC-HC all “enhancements” disabled in Intel graphic settings"></a>
{all “enhancements” disabled in Intel graphic settings}</p>

<ul>
<li>SMPlayer : Does not allow command line interaction or batch directory processing. The display of information is not customizable (does not allow to display the file size in bytes for instance). The colors on the screenshots appear shifted compared with the other tools, i.e. the greens are darker / less saturated while the reds are lighter / more saturated, which I know is related with the matrix used for YUV>RGB conversion (Bt.601 vs. Bt.709), but it's hard to determine which of these provide the most accurate representation.</li>
</ul>

<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/6mrmx.jpg" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/6mrmx.jpg" alt="SMPlayer"></a></p>

<ul>
<li>Scorp Video Thumbnail Maker (GUI tool) : The display of information is fairly customizable, it allows to treat a whole directory recursively, but there's a huge logo / watermark covering one tile with the free license.</li>
</ul>

<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/9vIXd.jpg" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/9vIXd.jpg" alt="Scorp Video Thumbnail Maker"></a></p>

<ul>
<li>MTN / Movie Thumbnailer (CLI tool, also included in StaxRip) : The display of informations is fairly customizable, but the aspect of the screenshots is slightly blurry compared with the others (perhaps it creates JPEG-compressed temporary files ?). That tool, which apparently hasn't been updated since 2008, comes as an already compiled .exe file interacting with a bunch of DLL (based on libavcodec), so I don't know how to see which commands it uses internally.</li>
</ul>

<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/qNQJy.jpg" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/qNQJy.jpg" alt="MTN"></a></p>

<ul>
<li>VCSI (Python script) : The display of informations is fairly customizable, but some useful items are missing (video bitrate for instance). A small drawback is that it seems to be creating a temporary PNG file for each tile before generating the actual thumbnails file, it's still quick enough with 4 tiles but could make it slower for more complex presentations. Since it comes as a script interacting with ffmpeg, I could modify some parameters if necessary.</li>
</ul>

<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/Unbz9.jpg" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/Unbz9.jpg" alt="VCSI"></a></p>

<p>QUESTIONS : </p>

<ul>
<li><p>My main issue is the color accuracy and sharpness of the screenshots. MTN would have been fine as it's simple and quick and provides all the relevant informations in the description, but the resulting files are definitely blurry : what are the likely causes of this ? When comparing the results, how can I determine which color representation is the most accurate, and is there a way to modify this behaviour, either by tweaking each tool's parameters or by adjusting global, system-wide parameters ?</p></li>
<li><p>Are there other similar tools which would be worth trying ?</p></li>
</ul>

<colorspace><thumbnails><screenshot>
Generating video thumbnails preview / contact sheet in batch, color issue
GabrielB
# Generating video thumbnails preview / contact sheet in batch, color issue

(Asked by: username_0 on 2018-10-28)

I have a large collection of videos to sort out, and for that purpose I want to create a thumbnail preview for each one of them, as quickly and efficiently as possible. I have tested several tools which have that capacity, with a varying degree of satisfaction.

* Media Player Classic : Does not allow command line interaction or batch directory processing. The presentation of timestamps and other informations is good enough as it is, but not customizable. The aspect of the screenshots, as I found out, depends upon the settings of the graphic driver : whether there are “enhancements” active or disabled, or whether the entry levels are set to full range or restricted range. With the default “restricted range”, the picture appears more vivid, with more contrast, but the blacks are crushed and the highlights are blown ; with entry levels set to “full range”, the picture is rather dull, with slightly faded / washed-out colors, similar to the representation of the other tools below.

[![MPC-HC default graphic settings](https://i.sstatic.net/ihwwe.jpg)](https://i.sstatic.net/ihwwe.jpg)
{default graphic settings}
[![MPC-HC “full range” in Intel graphic settings](https://i.sstatic.net/Vg0IV.jpg)](https://i.sstatic.net/Vg0IV.jpg)
{“full range” in Intel graphic settings}
[![MPC-HC all “enhancements” disabled in Intel graphic settings](https://i.sstatic.net/dgUc4.jpg)](https://i.sstatic.net/dgUc4.jpg)
{all “enhancements” disabled in Intel graphic settings}

* SMPlayer : Does not allow command line interaction or batch directory processing. The display of information is not customizable (does not allow to display the file size in bytes for instance). The colors on the screenshots appear shifted compared with the other tools, i.e. the greens are darker / less saturated while the reds are lighter / more saturated, which I know is related with the matrix used for YUV>RGB conversion (Bt.601 vs. Bt.709), but it's hard to determine which of these provide the most accurate representation.

[![SMPlayer](https://i.sstatic.net/6mrmx.jpg)](https://i.sstatic.net/6mrmx.jpg)

* Scorp Video Thumbnail Maker (GUI tool) : The display of information is fairly customizable, it allows to treat a whole directory recursively, but there's a huge logo / watermark covering one tile with the free license.

[![Scorp Video Thumbnail Maker](https://i.sstatic.net/9vIXd.jpg)](https://i.sstatic.net/9vIXd.jpg)

* MTN / Movie Thumbnailer (CLI tool, also included in StaxRip) : The display of informations is fairly customizable, but the aspect of the screenshots is slightly blurry compared with the others (perhaps it creates JPEG-compressed temporary files ?). That tool, which apparently hasn't been updated since 2008, comes as an already compiled .exe file interacting with a bunch of DLL (based on libavcodec), so I don't know how to see which commands it uses internally.

[![MTN](https://i.sstatic.net/qNQJy.jpg)](https://i.sstatic.net/qNQJy.jpg)

* VCSI (Python script) : The display of informations is fairly customizable, but some useful items are missing (video bitrate for instance). A small drawback is that it seems to be creating a temporary PNG file for each tile before generating the actual thumbnails file, it's still quick enough with 4 tiles but could make it slower for more complex presentations. Since it comes as a script interacting with ffmpeg, I could modify some parameters if necessary.

[![VCSI](https://i.sstatic.net/Unbz9.jpg)](https://i.sstatic.net/Unbz9.jpg)

QUESTIONS :

* My main issue is the color accuracy and sharpness of the screenshots. MTN would have been fine as it's simple and quick and provides all the relevant informations in the description, but the resulting files are definitely blurry : what are the likely causes of this ? When comparing the results, how can I determine which color representation is the most accurate, and is there a way to modify this behaviour, either by tweaking each tool's parameters or by adjusting global, system-wide parameters ?
* Are there other similar tools which would be worth trying ?

**Tags:** colorspace, thumbnails, screenshot


---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_0 on 2018-11-24. Score: 0

So here is what I found out, if anyone's interested (however unlikely this might be, considering the poor popularity of that question ! :)) :  
– Scorp Video Thumbnails Maker gets the colors right for Bt.709 footage with its “Engine 2” rendering module (not the other three with the current 11.0.0.3 version) and the CCCP codec pack. I created [a thread about that issue on the support forum for that tool](http://www.suu-design.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=1893).  
– I managed to tweak VCSI by adding `"-vf", "zscale=matrixin=709:matrix=709,format=rgb24",` to each `ffmpeg` call, so that it preserves Bt.709 colors; it's still slower and less convenient than Scorp VTM (and that modified script won't get accurate colors for Bt.601 footage so both versions would have to be installed and used accordingly), but it's free.  
– Since I created this thread I found a few other tools which can perform this task : StaxRip (which has an internal thumbnails preview generation module, in addition to the older MTN), PotPlayer, BSPlayer, Auto Movie Thumbnailer. The latter is based on MPlayer, and is supposed to give control over the rendering engine, but I couldn't get it to use Bt.709. Otherwise it's a good free dedicated GUI alternative to Scorp Movie Thumbnails Maker, with many customization options.

I also created [a thread on VideoHelp regarding that specific issue](https://forum.videohelp.com/threads/390691-Generating-video-thumbnails-preview-contact-sheet-in-batch-color-issue), and [another about the color accuracy of screenshots in general](https://forum.videohelp.com/threads/390710-Screenshots-and-respect-of-the-YUV-RGB-colorspace-conversion).


---

