<p>RG59 vs RG6 vs RG11 cable lengths</p>

<p>HDSDI can be 1.5GHz or 3.0 or more depending in if it is a 1080i or 1080P or 2K and at what frame rate.</p>

<p>It is a far more technical question requiring a much more detailed answer.  If you are buying cable, quad shield is supposed to be muchbetter than dual shield.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-09-19T14:36:55.937Z
2017-09-19T14:36:55.937Z
Rick Projectionist
<p>Unfortunately there is no perfect or exact answer. Your question topic mentions HD-SDI, which is a digital signal. Those tends to degrade 'cliff-wise', unlike analog signals where degradation is gradual. It will partly depend on the quality of the receiving device -- whether or not, or how well, it can capture the signal as the eye pattern turns to mush.</p>

<p>Having said that, 900 feet over RG59 is bound to be trouble, even over the premium shielded variants like Belden 1505a. For 720p, that's rated for maybe 200 feet. Your footage may vary (-:</p>

<p>RG6 will be better, but again, shielding matters so you're better off with 1694a or equivalent. Even then, I wouldn't gamble on 900' without testing it in place.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2013-04-07T13:10:43.753Z
Thanks for the thorough answer. After further research, it does look like Belden 1694a RG6 will probably be the best bang for my buck. Here's a chart from Belden showing their cables and the recommended footage: http://www.belden.com/docs/upload/Recommended_Transmission_Distance_at_Serial_Digital_Data_Rates.pdf
Luke Shaheen
CC BY-SA 3.0
2013-04-07T13:11:45.587Z
Using that chart and a dealer's pricing charts, it looks like the 1694a RG6 is the best price point. If I go down in the cable, it looses distance. If I go up, it gets too pricey.
Luke Shaheen
CC BY-SA 3.0
2013-04-07T23:54:54.510Z
When considering costs, don't forget to consider the cost of testing out various solutions, replacing 'cheap' cable with better cable, etc. Also factor in the labor cost of running 900' of cable. Taken as a percentage of your total cost rather than an absolute value, the upgrade to better cable may be more palatable.
ObscureRobot
CC BY-SA 3.0
2013-04-07T00:21:11.193Z
2013-04-07T00:21:11.193Z
Jim Mack
<p>It seems there are lots of discussions on the web, none recently though, on <code>RG6</code> vs <code>RG59</code> and the distances that they can carry signal.</p>

<p>For situations when quality matters, such as live streaming (as opposed to something like CCTV), is <code>RG6</code> the only way to go?</p>

<p>A <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/415820-REG/Canare_L_4CFB_984_L_4CFB_75_Ohm_RG59.html" rel="nofollow">984' RG59</a> cable costs just about as much as a <a href="http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/863724-REG/Canare_200_HD_SDI_Video_Coaxial.html" rel="nofollow">200' RG6</a> cable. Assume that the signal is powerful enough to send the signal over 900'. Will the <code>RG59</code> cable experience significant and noticeable signal loss compared to the <code>RG6</code> cable? </p>

<p>There is a significant price different between the two types, so if I can get away with a <code>RG59</code> cable, certainly I will.</p>

<streaming><cable><sdi>
RG6 vs RG59 HD-SDI cables for live stream
Luke Shaheen
# RG6 vs RG59 HD-SDI cables for live stream

(Asked by: username_0 on 2013-04-05)

It seems there are lots of discussions on the web, none recently though, on `RG6` vs `RG59` and the distances that they can carry signal.

For situations when quality matters, such as live streaming (as opposed to something like CCTV), is `RG6` the only way to go?

A [984' RG59](http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/415820-REG/Canare_L_4CFB_984_L_4CFB_75_Ohm_RG59.html) cable costs just about as much as a [200' RG6](http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/863724-REG/Canare_200_HD_SDI_Video_Coaxial.html) cable. Assume that the signal is powerful enough to send the signal over 900'. Will the `RG59` cable experience significant and noticeable signal loss compared to the `RG6` cable?

There is a significant price different between the two types, so if I can get away with a `RG59` cable, certainly I will.

**Tags:** streaming, cable, sdi


---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_2 on 2013-04-07. Score: 4 | Accepted answer

Unfortunately there is no perfect or exact answer. Your question topic mentions HD-SDI, which is a digital signal. Those tends to degrade 'cliff-wise', unlike analog signals where degradation is gradual. It will partly depend on the quality of the receiving device -- whether or not, or how well, it can capture the signal as the eye pattern turns to mush.

Having said that, 900 feet over RG59 is bound to be trouble, even over the premium shielded variants like Belden 1505a. For 720p, that's rated for maybe 200 feet. Your footage may vary (-:

RG6 will be better, but again, shielding matters so you're better off with 1694a or equivalent. Even then, I wouldn't gamble on 900' without testing it in place.

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: Thanks for the thorough answer. After further research, it does look like Belden 1694a RG6 will probably be the best bang for my buck. Here's a chart from Belden showing their cables and the recommended footage: http://www.belden.com/docs/upload/Recommended_Transmission_Distance_at_Serial_Digital_Data_Rates.pdf  
> **username_0**: Using that chart and a dealer's pricing charts, it looks like the 1694a RG6 is the best price point. If I go down in the cable, it looses distance. If I go up, it gets too pricey.  
> **username_3**: When considering costs, don't forget to consider the cost of testing out various solutions, replacing 'cheap' cable with better cable, etc. Also factor in the labor cost of running 900' of cable. Taken as a percentage of your total cost rather than an absolute value, the upgrade to better cable may be more palatable.  

---

### Answer by username_1 on 2017-09-19. Score: -1

RG59 vs RG6 vs RG11 cable lengths

HDSDI can be 1.5GHz or 3.0 or more depending in if it is a 1080i or 1080P or 2K and at what frame rate.

It is a far more technical question requiring a much more detailed answer. If you are buying cable, quad shield is supposed to be muchbetter than dual shield.


---

