<p>So I am a singer with a huge dynamic range. I think it is useful to let the singer hear the problem (i.e. the clipping or etc.) and then to ask her/him to adjust distance to the mic for particularly loud passages. I think this comes quite naturally to many singers as most of us have seen our favourite singers do this. I also think that it's worthwhile to let them know that many technical solutions have drawbacks (let them hear these). I also think that reminding them that they are in studio as opposed to on a stage, and that as such, that there are more options apart from volume to communicate intensity is also a good idea. Letting them play around and listen to the effects is something they can do before getting into studio (with a mic and computer at home) or depending upon the studio something they can experiment in studio. </p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-03-14T17:54:14.047Z
2017-03-14T17:54:14.047Z
Antonella
<p>I'm no audio engineer, but I wonder: When doing multitrack-recordings anyway, why not place a &quot;backup microphone&quot; at some distance?</p>
<p>So if the main vocal microphone starts clipping, you could blend over to the backup microphone that has a lower input level.
Maybe you'll have to compensate for the runtime of the audio, too.</p>
<p>The other thing is that 24-bits covers a huge range, allowing for a safety margin (meaning: don't head for 0dB) unless your equipment is rather noisy.</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2023-04-28T18:58:24.140Z
2023-04-28T18:58:24.140Z
U. Windl
<p>What Kim Burgaard said is very true. The vocalist has a lot of control over how their voice is recorded. As I'm a much inferior vocalist to those I record, it can be difficult teaching them this technique, as you just want to get a good take.</p>

<p>So what I end up doing is have the vocalist scream. Well, I ask them to warm up and hit the loudest levels they can. I then adjust via that. I try not affect overall sound with compression in the analog domain. With the takes in 24bit, I can use envelopes or a compressor in the mixing stage.</p>

<p>I would stay away from ridding the level during recording. It's more difficult to get the levels right in the mixing stage.</p>

<p>You mention running a second mic for the vocal. I would hope that is what you are doing anyway. I don't think recording the mic and guitar with one mic is a good idea at all. You'll not be able to mix anything.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2011-05-02T04:55:26.663Z
No no no no no. A second mic *for the vocal*; I already had a mic for the guitar and a mic for the vocal.
Goodbye Stack Exchange
CC BY-SA 3.0
2011-05-02T04:57:56.897Z
But yeah, I do the "what's the loudest thing you'll be singing" question, and set the trim based on that, then add a little for safety. When I add a little more, I always [misunderestimate](http://english.stackexchange.com/q/23363/161) and go too low. Performers often get caught up in their energy and go louder than they thought they would; I'll try asking them to scream!
Goodbye Stack Exchange
CC BY-SA 3.0
2011-05-02T05:20:16.297Z
I see what you mean. I don't think two mics on the vocal will help this situation any. It sounds like you are doing the right thing. If you have a nice pre with a good compressor, that should help a lot. Though, you'll probably have to play it safe with that MOTU and bring down the levels. It takes time to get to know a singer and how they perform. It sounds like you are going at quite a pace!
d-_-b
CC BY-SA 3.0
2011-05-02T05:26:41.070Z
@Kim Burgaard, Of course you raise the noise floor. While 24bit helps, it won't be as good as a silent studio with a great pre and analog compressor. However, it looks like the MOTU Audio Express and a noisy room is the environment.
d-_-b
CC BY-SA 3.0
2011-05-02T05:32:09.237Z
@sims - Well, "learn to live with it" *is* an option. :)
Goodbye Stack Exchange
CC BY-SA 3.0
2011-05-02T06:07:23.000Z
@Neil Fein, I'd probably change that to "learn to deal with it". I'm sure you can get some good sound out of what you have. ;)
d-_-b
CC BY-SA 3.0
2011-07-14T06:02:28.847Z
In the end, the sound was quite excellent. I delivered good, clean tracks to the client. Thanks for the advice.
Goodbye Stack Exchange
CC BY-SA 3.0
2011-05-02T04:53:54.657Z
2011-05-02T04:53:54.657Z
d-_-b
<p>Just finished a tracking session with a singer who has a <em>huge</em> dynamic range. This musician is otherwise very professional, and is a joy to have in the studio, and I'm not in any way criticizing her. However, there are some variables I'd like to know how to handle should they recur (with either her or another musician): </p>

<p>The was musician playing guitar while singing live in the studio. By the end of the session, we got the takes we needed, and their quality was good. She never needed more than a few takes, but we had to do a few retakes on top of that because of a little clipping. (But hey, six songs in three hours...not bad.) But this is making me wonder: </p>

<p>The extreme dynamic range makes using the pad setting problematic, coupled with a slightly noisy environment. (Read: lotsa planes and trucks today in my normally quiet neighborhood.) </p>

<p>In general, what can one do to cope with a situation like this? Should the tracking engineer ride the trim pot in a situation like this, or would that make the recording choppy? Suck it up and use automation and light compression on the audio in post? Run a second mic for the vocal?</p>

<p>Here's my rig. (Today was the first non-test session with a new computer and interface, after a recent rig meltdown.)</p>

<ul>
<li>Macbook Pro with Garageband, wille export to Logic for mixdown</li>
<li><a href="http://www.motu.com/products/motuaudio/audio-express">MOTU Audio Express</a> interface</li>
<li>SM58 on her vocal and a Studio Projects C1 on her guitar, with a bit of bleed between the two (as anticipated)</li>
</ul>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2023-04-29T12:40:55.210Z
This question should have been migrated to SOund Design years ago, but we must have missed it - too old to move now, so I'll close it.
Dr Mayhem
<clipping><tracking>
How to handle extreme dynamic range in a vocalist?
Goodbye Stack Exchange
# How to handle extreme dynamic range in a vocalist?

(Asked by: username_0 on 2011-05-02)

Just finished a tracking session with a singer who has a *huge* dynamic range. This musician is otherwise very professional, and is a joy to have in the studio, and I'm not in any way criticizing her. However, there are some variables I'd like to know how to handle should they recur (with either her or another musician):

The was musician playing guitar while singing live in the studio. By the end of the session, we got the takes we needed, and their quality was good. She never needed more than a few takes, but we had to do a few retakes on top of that because of a little clipping. (But hey, six songs in three hours...not bad.) But this is making me wonder:

The extreme dynamic range makes using the pad setting problematic, coupled with a slightly noisy environment. (Read: lotsa planes and trucks today in my normally quiet neighborhood.)

In general, what can one do to cope with a situation like this? Should the tracking engineer ride the trim pot in a situation like this, or would that make the recording choppy? Suck it up and use automation and light compression on the audio in post? Run a second mic for the vocal?

Here's my rig. (Today was the first non-test session with a new computer and interface, after a recent rig meltdown.)

* Macbook Pro with Garageband, wille export to Logic for mixdown
* [MOTU Audio Express](http://www.motu.com/products/motuaudio/audio-express) interface
* SM58 on her vocal and a Studio Projects C1 on her guitar, with a bit of bleed between the two (as anticipated)

**Tags:** clipping, tracking

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: This question should have been migrated to SOund Design years ago, but we must have missed it - too old to move now, so I'll close it.  

---

## 3 answers

### Answer by username_4 on 2011-05-02. Score: 3 | Accepted answer

What Kim Burgaard said is very true. The vocalist has a lot of control over how their voice is recorded. As I'm a much inferior vocalist to those I record, it can be difficult teaching them this technique, as you just want to get a good take.

So what I end up doing is have the vocalist scream. Well, I ask them to warm up and hit the loudest levels they can. I then adjust via that. I try not affect overall sound with compression in the analog domain. With the takes in 24bit, I can use envelopes or a compressor in the mixing stage.

I would stay away from ridding the level during recording. It's more difficult to get the levels right in the mixing stage.

You mention running a second mic for the vocal. I would hope that is what you are doing anyway. I don't think recording the mic and guitar with one mic is a good idea at all. You'll not be able to mix anything.

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: No no no no no. A second mic *for the vocal*; I already had a mic for the guitar and a mic for the vocal.  
> **username_0**: But yeah, I do the "what's the loudest thing you'll be singing" question, and set the trim based on that, then add a little for safety. When I add a little more, I always [misunderestimate](http://english.stackexchange.com/q/23363/161) and go too low. Performers often get caught up in their energy and go louder than they thought they would; I'll try asking them to scream!  
> **username_4**: I see what you mean. I don't think two mics on the vocal will help this situation any. It sounds like you are doing the right thing. If you have a nice pre with a good compressor, that should help a lot. Though, you'll probably have to play it safe with that MOTU and bring down the levels. It takes time to get to know a singer and how they perform. It sounds like you are going at quite a pace!  
> **username_4**: @Kim Burgaard, Of course you raise the noise floor. While 24bit helps, it won't be as good as a silent studio with a great pre and analog compressor. However, it looks like the MOTU Audio Express and a noisy room is the environment.  
> **username_0**: @sims - Well, "learn to live with it" *is* an option. :)  
> **username_4**: @Neil Fein, I'd probably change that to "learn to deal with it". I'm sure you can get some good sound out of what you have. ;)  
> **username_0**: In the end, the sound was quite excellent. I delivered good, clean tracks to the client. Thanks for the advice.  

---

### Answer by username_2 on 2017-03-14. Score: 2

So I am a singer with a huge dynamic range. I think it is useful to let the singer hear the problem (i.e. the clipping or etc.) and then to ask her/him to adjust distance to the mic for particularly loud passages. I think this comes quite naturally to many singers as most of us have seen our favourite singers do this. I also think that it's worthwhile to let them know that many technical solutions have drawbacks (let them hear these). I also think that reminding them that they are in studio as opposed to on a stage, and that as such, that there are more options apart from volume to communicate intensity is also a good idea. Letting them play around and listen to the effects is something they can do before getting into studio (with a mic and computer at home) or depending upon the studio something they can experiment in studio.


---

### Answer by username_3 on 2023-04-28. Score: 0

I'm no audio engineer, but I wonder: When doing multitrack-recordings anyway, why not place a "backup microphone" at some distance?

So if the main vocal microphone starts clipping, you could blend over to the backup microphone that has a lower input level.
Maybe you'll have to compensate for the runtime of the audio, too.

The other thing is that 24-bits covers a huge range, allowing for a safety margin (meaning: don't head for 0dB) unless your equipment is rather noisy.


---

