<p>The primal problem will be the stabilization. GoPro's Cameras offer a decent image-stabilization and are wide-angled. This allows shakes and bumps to have less of an impact. If you now go for a camcorder with, say, a lens of 50mm, you will experience an extreme increase in shakiness.</p>

<p>In other words: When you worry about your camera to break due to shakes and bumps, the footage will most likely not be great.</p>

<p>There are some options you have, which one to choose is on you.</p>

<p>First, you could try to buy a GoPro that can record in 4k (maybe you already own one). That way, you can hit two birds with one stone. On the one hand side, you will be able to zoom in digitally in post without losing any image quality, assuming you want to render in full HD (1920x1080). This fixes the issue of the wide-angle lens. On the other hand side, there will be plenty of material around the visible area, so a warp-stabilizer in After-Effects should easily help stabilize the footage, giving you a much more smooth result than opting to put a camcorder on your bike.</p>

<p>The other options would be to use a camcorder indeed, or even a tv-production or cinema-camera if you like, but staying off that bike. Either, you can rent or buy a Steady-Cam or Gimble (the ones from Ronin are very good) and run along. The Gimble or Steady-Cam will stabilize your Camera and will give you probably the best results (assuming you know how to properly use a Gimble / Steady-Cam).
This is also the priciest option though, I fear.</p>

<p>The other is to use the camcorder or higher-tier camera again, but stay still entirely. You can try to find a Spot on the path where the water flows around you a small bit, like in any curve of the river. Position yourself on the extended piece of land and just pan with the Subject, instead of moving at all. This would be the easiest and probably cheapest option, though it only really works well for short, preferably fast pace sequences, so you don't catch that the camera is stationary. Many people use this method to capture people running in forests: The actors simply run in a circle around the camera and the operator pans with them, which results in footage looking like they follow the subject horizontally.</p>

<p>I hope my answer was helpful, good luck with your project!</p>

CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-05-20T11:52:09.497Z
Thanks for the detailed comments. I am post-processing my videos for stabilisation already using ffmpeg and have experimented with DIY replacing the lens in the GoPro. Not moving along is not an option as these videos are used for coaching and feedback - so it is not an artistic endeavour.
Christian Lindig
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-05-20T11:53:49.610Z
Indeed, when you go for a tighter lens, you will increase the shakiness. Post-Processing stabilization should not be a necessity, it should retouch small bumps. When you up your gopro to, say, 50mm, you will end up with a shake that even stabilization won't make pretty.
Florian Claaßen
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-05-21T08:25:32.537Z
I found the discussion at [Stabilizing GoPro videos](https://video.stackexchange.com/a/10512/24544) helpful, too.
Christian Lindig
CC BY-SA 4.0
2019-05-20T11:42:11.137Z
2019-05-20T11:42:11.137Z
Florian Claaßen
<p>I am using a GoPro mounted to a bike to capture crews rowing in a boat next to a (gravel) bike path. I am mostly happy with what the GoPro offers except that I need a less wide-angled view. For better quality and having access to zoom lenses, I am considering using a camcorder instead. However, I am worried that mechanical vibrations are going to break the camcorder which I would expect containing moving parts whereas a GoPro has none. Any recommendations from people taking videos by mounting them to vehicles (rather than holding them)?</p>

<p>Example: <a href="https://vimeo.com/338228818" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://vimeo.com/338228818</a></p>

<camcorder><action-cam><gopro>
Camcorder vs. GoPro mounted on bike
Christian Lindig
# Camcorder vs. GoPro mounted on bike

(Asked by: username_0 on 2019-05-19)

I am using a GoPro mounted to a bike to capture crews rowing in a boat next to a (gravel) bike path. I am mostly happy with what the GoPro offers except that I need a less wide-angled view. For better quality and having access to zoom lenses, I am considering using a camcorder instead. However, I am worried that mechanical vibrations are going to break the camcorder which I would expect containing moving parts whereas a GoPro has none. Any recommendations from people taking videos by mounting them to vehicles (rather than holding them)?

Example: <https://vimeo.com/338228818>

**Tags:** camcorder, action-cam, gopro


---

## 1 answers

### Answer by username_1 on 2019-05-20. Score: 2 | Accepted answer

The primal problem will be the stabilization. GoPro's Cameras offer a decent image-stabilization and are wide-angled. This allows shakes and bumps to have less of an impact. If you now go for a camcorder with, say, a lens of 50mm, you will experience an extreme increase in shakiness.

In other words: When you worry about your camera to break due to shakes and bumps, the footage will most likely not be great.

There are some options you have, which one to choose is on you.

First, you could try to buy a GoPro that can record in 4k (maybe you already own one). That way, you can hit two birds with one stone. On the one hand side, you will be able to zoom in digitally in post without losing any image quality, assuming you want to render in full HD (1920x1080). This fixes the issue of the wide-angle lens. On the other hand side, there will be plenty of material around the visible area, so a warp-stabilizer in After-Effects should easily help stabilize the footage, giving you a much more smooth result than opting to put a camcorder on your bike.

The other options would be to use a camcorder indeed, or even a tv-production or cinema-camera if you like, but staying off that bike. Either, you can rent or buy a Steady-Cam or Gimble (the ones from Ronin are very good) and run along. The Gimble or Steady-Cam will stabilize your Camera and will give you probably the best results (assuming you know how to properly use a Gimble / Steady-Cam).
This is also the priciest option though, I fear.

The other is to use the camcorder or higher-tier camera again, but stay still entirely. You can try to find a Spot on the path where the water flows around you a small bit, like in any curve of the river. Position yourself on the extended piece of land and just pan with the Subject, instead of moving at all. This would be the easiest and probably cheapest option, though it only really works well for short, preferably fast pace sequences, so you don't catch that the camera is stationary. Many people use this method to capture people running in forests: The actors simply run in a circle around the camera and the operator pans with them, which results in footage looking like they follow the subject horizontally.

I hope my answer was helpful, good luck with your project!

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: Thanks for the detailed comments. I am post-processing my videos for stabilisation already using ffmpeg and have experimented with DIY replacing the lens in the GoPro. Not moving along is not an option as these videos are used for coaching and feedback - so it is not an artistic endeavour.  
> **username_1**: Indeed, when you go for a tighter lens, you will increase the shakiness. Post-Processing stabilization should not be a necessity, it should retouch small bumps. When you up your gopro to, say, 50mm, you will end up with a shake that even stabilization won't make pretty.  
> **username_0**: I found the discussion at [Stabilizing GoPro videos](https://video.stackexchange.com/a/10512/24544) helpful, too.  

---

