<p>I noticed a couple of issues on your sequence settings. Your pixel aspect ratio should be square pixels. You also shouldn't have interlaced fields. They should be progressive to match your output settings. If you are using a higher resolution image, you need to scale it down under motion in effects settings. I'm pretty sure that's what's happening.</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-04-14T15:20:46.123Z
The square aspect ratio was the source of my issue! apparently premiere doesnt like certain effects on things if your aspect isnt square, so thank you!
Eren Black Edits
CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-04-10T05:09:49.883Z
2017-04-10T05:09:49.883Z
LetTheWritersWrite
<p>I'd say you may need to do nested compositions; and pre-renders with that many layers. </p>

<p>The honest truth is there are bugs in premiere... in terms of if you have a lot of layers; with specific opacity settings, or filters applied to them; in particular 3rd party filters; they simply don't always play well together. </p>

<p>Thats why AfterEffects tends to be a more useful platform for projects using lots of layers. </p>

<p>They are idiosynchosies... they don't make sense... in terms of what causes them. They might preview correct within premiere, but output with issues. </p>

<p>The fix is typically to either move to AE, or pre-comp grouped layers to reduce the total layers/effects. Render pre-comps of layers with effects applied, then use the new file as the source with no filter. </p>

<p>Lastly, as stated above, make sure you are interpolating your footage to the same standard, progressive or interlaced. </p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-04-10T04:54:57.440Z
2017-04-10T04:54:57.440Z
McFlySoHigh
<p>I have an issue to where the sequence preview resolution sometimes changes when certain objects are in play. My settings are all correct and match, but for some odd reason, it still comes out wrong. Here are some examples of that:</p>

<p><a href="https://i.sstatic.net/Xmwpf.jpg" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/Xmwpf.jpg" alt="1-3"></a>
<a href="https://i.sstatic.net/gvGm9.png" rel="nofollow noreferrer"><img src="https://i.sstatic.net/gvGm9.png" alt="4-6"></a></p>

<p>Does anyone have an answer to my issue?</p>

CC BY-SA 3.0
2017-04-10T02:06:30.123Z
Is page2 heart bigger than 1920x1080? are those black bars something you want or not: if not, shouldn't you be using a pixel aspect ratio of 1, the dv preset is meant for SD footage asfaik? side note: why are you using interlaced if you are outputting progressive?
Alex
<premiere><pro><cc-2014>
Premiere pro cc 2014 Rendered out video not matching sequence, as well as sequence constantly changing
Eren Black Edits
# Premiere pro cc 2014 Rendered out video not matching sequence, as well as sequence constantly changing

(Asked by: username_0 on 2017-04-09)

I have an issue to where the sequence preview resolution sometimes changes when certain objects are in play. My settings are all correct and match, but for some odd reason, it still comes out wrong. Here are some examples of that:

[![1-3](https://i.sstatic.net/Xmwpf.jpg)](https://i.sstatic.net/Xmwpf.jpg)
[![4-6](https://i.sstatic.net/gvGm9.png)](https://i.sstatic.net/gvGm9.png)

Does anyone have an answer to my issue?

**Tags:** premiere, pro, cc-2014

> **Comments:**
> **username_1**: Is page2 heart bigger than 1920x1080? are those black bars something you want or not: if not, shouldn't you be using a pixel aspect ratio of 1, the dv preset is meant for SD footage asfaik? side note: why are you using interlaced if you are outputting progressive?  

---

## 2 answers

### Answer by username_2 on 2017-04-10. Score: 0 | Accepted answer

I noticed a couple of issues on your sequence settings. Your pixel aspect ratio should be square pixels. You also shouldn't have interlaced fields. They should be progressive to match your output settings. If you are using a higher resolution image, you need to scale it down under motion in effects settings. I'm pretty sure that's what's happening.

> **Comments:**
> **username_0**: The square aspect ratio was the source of my issue! apparently premiere doesnt like certain effects on things if your aspect isnt square, so thank you!  

---

### Answer by username_3 on 2017-04-10. Score: 0

I'd say you may need to do nested compositions; and pre-renders with that many layers.

The honest truth is there are bugs in premiere... in terms of if you have a lot of layers; with specific opacity settings, or filters applied to them; in particular 3rd party filters; they simply don't always play well together.

Thats why AfterEffects tends to be a more useful platform for projects using lots of layers.

They are idiosynchosies... they don't make sense... in terms of what causes them. They might preview correct within premiere, but output with issues.

The fix is typically to either move to AE, or pre-comp grouped layers to reduce the total layers/effects. Render pre-comps of layers with effects applied, then use the new file as the source with no filter.

Lastly, as stated above, make sure you are interpolating your footage to the same standard, progressive or interlaced.


---

