text stringlengths 12 234k | embeddings sequencelengths 1.02k 1.02k |
|---|---|
Levin, J.
The question presented is whether annual installments of a Michigan state lottery prize, unpaid at the winner’s death, are exempt from the inheritance tax under a provision of the Lottery Act providing that no state or local tax "of any kind whatsoever shall be imposed upon the proceeds from a prize” awarded ... | [
-0.04443359375,
0.0230712890625,
0.01263427734375,
0.002655029296875,
-0.037353515625,
-0.0167236328125,
-0.0220947265625,
0.01171875,
-0.023681640625,
0.046142578125,
0.0419921875,
0.0017242431640625,
0.00927734375,
0.0167236328125,
-0.021240234375,
-0.056396484375,
-0.0390625,
0.... |
Griffin, J.
Defendant was bound over for trial to face felony charges on the basis of hearsay testimony erroneously admitted at the preliminary examination. Although it appears that the ensuing trial was fair and error free, the Court of Appeals determined that this error compelled automatic reversal of defendant’s con... | [
-0.01123046875,
0.006195068359375,
0.0184326171875,
0.0206298828125,
-0.040771484375,
-0.033935546875,
-0.04931640625,
-0.02392578125,
-0.030517578125,
0.06982421875,
0.07861328125,
-0.0169677734375,
0.0020294189453125,
0.0034942626953125,
-0.00714111328125,
-0.01397705078125,
-0.010... |
Archer, J.
We granted leave to appeal in order to consider two principal questions. The first question is whether four police reports were properly admitted into evidence under either MRE 803(6), the business records exception to the hearsay rule, or MRE 803(8), the public records hearsay exception. The second question... | [
0.0018157958984375,
0.01373291015625,
0.00982666015625,
0.0247802734375,
-0.0546875,
-0.009765625,
-0.05908203125,
-0.0157470703125,
-0.0016937255859375,
0.0517578125,
0.0361328125,
0.0120849609375,
0.01171875,
0.0225830078125,
-0.004852294921875,
-0.01165771484375,
-0.01708984375,
... |
"Boyle, J.\nWe consider whether the Court of Appeals properly reversed the trial court’s decision (...TRUNCATED) | [-0.0272216796875,0.00537109375,0.01336669921875,0.040771484375,-0.053466796875,-0.0162353515625,-0.(...TRUNCATED) |
"Per Curiam.\nThe defendants are insurance companies that cannot agree with regard to their respecti(...TRUNCATED) | [-0.01434326171875,0.01068115234375,0.0322265625,0.035400390625,-0.0264892578125,-0.00836181640625,-(...TRUNCATED) |
"Brickley, J.\nThis case presents the question whether procedural due process is denied a public sch(...TRUNCATED) | [0.03173828125,-0.031494140625,0.0234375,0.036865234375,-0.031005859375,-0.0181884765625,-0.06640625(...TRUNCATED) |
"Brickuey, J.\nI. INTRODUCTION\nA\nBefore us today stands a defendant who alleges that the trial cou(...TRUNCATED) | [-0.0032958984375,-0.000278472900390625,0.00836181640625,0.0267333984375,-0.08740234375,-0.029296875(...TRUNCATED) |
"AFTER REMAND\nBrickley, J.\nThe issues presented in this case are whether a plaintiff, before comme(...TRUNCATED) | [-0.00738525390625,-0.044921875,-0.0283203125,0.0625,-0.0230712890625,-0.05517578125,-0.003234863281(...TRUNCATED) |
"AFTER REMAND\nBrickley, J.\nI am unable to agree entirely with the analysis adopted in the opinions(...TRUNCATED) | [0.00982666015625,-0.0128173828125,0.01806640625,0.03564453125,-0.05712890625,-0.046142578125,-0.032(...TRUNCATED) |
"ON REHEARING\nBrickley, J.\nAddison Township and Michigan Consolidated Gas Company entered into a c(...TRUNCATED) | [-0.015869140625,-0.006500244140625,0.016845703125,0.0260009765625,-0.068359375,-0.0225830078125,-0.(...TRUNCATED) |
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 20