Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
url
stringlengths
32
34
url_pdf
stringlengths
32
34
title
stringlengths
9
197
authors
stringlengths
6
601
primary_category
stringclasses
1 value
categories
stringlengths
5
61
abstract
stringlengths
34
3.18k
updated
timestamp[s]
published
timestamp[s]
embeddings_title
sequence
embeddings_abstract
sequence
http://arxiv.org/abs/cs/9809020v1
http://arxiv.org/pdf/cs/9809020v1
Linear Segmentation and Segment Significance
Min-Yen Kan, Judith L. Klavans, Kathleen R. McKeown
cs.CL
cs.CL, I.2.7
We present a new method for discovering a segmental discourse structure of a document while categorizing segment function. We demonstrate how retrieval of noun phrases and pronominal forms, along with a zero-sum weighting scheme, determines topicalized segmentation. Futhermore, we use term distribution to aid in identifying the role that the segment performs in the document. Finally, we present results of evaluation in terms of precision and recall which surpass earlier approaches.
1998-09-15T23:49:32
1998-09-15T23:49:32
[ -0.0027198792, -0.0076446533, -0.014167786, 0.002407074, -0.034484863, -0.027618408, 0.005458832, 0.0058021545, -0.06732178, 0.018508911, 0.04397583, 0.042388916, -0.04525757, -0.043884277, 0.04220581, -0.018463135, 0.005355835, 0.0063438416, -0.009307861, -0.02305603, -0.007...
[ 0.02722168, -0.017074585, -0.018417358, -0.040802002, -0.0209198, -0.01210022, -0.06262207, -0.005168915, 0.0090789795, 0.032562256, 0.010124207, 0.01309967, 0.0048179626, -0.007419586, -0.021484375, -0.01789856, -0.012229919, 0.046447754, -0.011108398, -0.013725281, -0.01675...
http://arxiv.org/abs/cs/9809022v1
http://arxiv.org/pdf/cs/9809022v1
Modelling Users, Intentions, and Structure in Spoken Dialog
Bernd Ludwig, Guenther Goerz, Heinrich Niemann
cs.CL
cs.CL, H.5.2
We outline how utterances in dialogs can be interpreted using a partial first order logic. We exploit the capability of this logic to talk about the truth status of formulae to define a notion of coherence between utterances and explain how this coherence relation can serve for the construction of AND/OR trees that represent the segmentation of the dialog. In a BDI model we formalize basic assumptions about dialog and cooperative behaviour of participants. These assumptions provide a basis for inferring speech acts from coherence relations between utterances and attitudes of dialog participants. Speech acts prove to be useful for determining dialog segments defined on the notion of completing expectations of dialog participants. Finally, we sketch how explicit segmentation signalled by cue phrases and performatives is covered by our dialog model.
1998-09-17T11:10:14
1998-09-17T11:10:14
[ 0.03768921, 0.0007972717, -0.03326416, -0.044006348, -0.035858154, -0.013000488, -0.061950684, -0.015396118, 0.0112838745, 0.021728516, 0.013259888, -0.03338623, -0.0012245178, -0.040771484, -0.027526855, -0.020950317, -0.02583313, 0.015617371, -0.033966064, -0.04336548, -0.0...
[ 0.0059127808, -0.036346436, -0.038238525, -0.07531738, -0.02230835, -0.005630493, -0.077941895, 0.020477295, -0.023040771, 0.03567505, 0.013244629, 0.024887085, -0.007633209, -0.0065574646, -0.02418518, -0.024887085, -0.03668213, 0.045043945, 0.0028877258, -0.038238525, 0.000...
http://arxiv.org/abs/cs/9809024v2
http://arxiv.org/pdf/cs/9809024v2
A Lexicalized Tree Adjoining Grammar for English
XTAG Research Group
cs.CL
cs.CL, I.2.7; D.3.1
This document describes a sizable grammar of English written in the TAG formalism and implemented for use with the XTAG system. This report and the grammar described herein supersedes the TAG grammar described in an earlier 1995 XTAG technical report. The English grammar described in this report is based on the TAG formalism which has been extended to include lexicalization, and unification-based feature structures. The range of syntactic phenomena that can be handled is large and includes auxiliaries (including inversion), copula, raising and small clause constructions, topicalization, relative clauses, infinitives, gerunds, passives, adjuncts, it-clefts, wh-clefts, PRO constructions, noun-noun modifications, extraposition, determiner sequences, genitives, negation, noun-verb contractions, sentential adjuncts and imperatives. This technical report corresponds to the XTAG Release 8/31/98. The XTAG grammar is continuously updated with the addition of new analyses and modification of old ones, and an online version of this report can be found at the XTAG web page at http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~xtag/
1998-09-18T02:49:22
1998-09-18T00:33:47
[ -0.008674622, -0.034484863, -0.020111084, -0.09283447, -0.027557373, 0.045043945, -0.09246826, 0.046966553, -0.0018472672, 0.028305054, -0.040405273, 0.035888672, -0.015113831, 0.0028190613, -0.004711151, -0.011054993, -0.013252258, 0.054595947, -0.0049476624, -0.031280518, 0...
[ 0.012908936, 0.004371643, -0.010063171, -0.06665039, 0.0016260147, 0.024856567, -0.0670166, -0.0065612793, -0.004207611, 0.038757324, -0.017791748, -0.008773804, 0.038269043, -0.0046653748, 0.0015192032, -0.012886047, -0.028076172, 0.078125, 0.021820068, -0.044769287, 0.00827...
http://arxiv.org/abs/cs/9809026v1
http://arxiv.org/pdf/cs/9809026v1
Prefix Probabilities from Stochastic Tree Adjoining Grammars
Mark-Jan Nederhof, Anoop Sarkar, Giorgio Satta
cs.CL
cs.CL, I.2.7; D.3.1
Language models for speech recognition typically use a probability model of the form Pr(a_n | a_1, a_2, ..., a_{n-1}). Stochastic grammars, on the other hand, are typically used to assign structure to utterances. A language model of the above form is constructed from such grammars by computing the prefix probability Sum_{w in Sigma*} Pr(a_1 ... a_n w), where w represents all possible terminations of the prefix a_1 ... a_n. The main result in this paper is an algorithm to compute such prefix probabilities given a stochastic Tree Adjoining Grammar (TAG). The algorithm achieves the required computation in O(n^6) time. The probability of subderivations that do not derive any words in the prefix, but contribute structurally to its derivation, are precomputed to achieve termination. This algorithm enables existing corpus-based estimation techniques for stochastic TAGs to be used for language modelling.
1998-09-18T03:45:45
1998-09-18T03:45:45
[ -0.031082153, -0.016220093, -0.0385437, -0.08831787, -0.028381348, 0.03970337, -0.11053467, 0.025268555, -0.0138168335, 0.0049972534, 0.02670288, 0.019470215, -0.03768921, -0.038757324, 0.004169464, -0.008674622, -0.021896362, 0.042175293, -0.048828125, -0.05331421, 0.0027046...
[ -0.01209259, -0.017211914, -0.02557373, -0.04574585, -0.026901245, 0.021850586, -0.11584473, -0.0085372925, -0.020477295, 0.007335663, -0.0008482933, -0.014678955, -0.01374054, -0.02658081, 0.0013437271, -0.045715332, -0.024032593, 0.06210327, -0.0013103485, -0.03503418, 0.01...
http://arxiv.org/abs/cs/9809027v1
http://arxiv.org/pdf/cs/9809027v1
Conditions on Consistency of Probabilistic Tree Adjoining Grammars
Anoop Sarkar
cs.CL
cs.CL, I.2.7; D.3.1
Much of the power of probabilistic methods in modelling language comes from their ability to compare several derivations for the same string in the language. An important starting point for the study of such cross-derivational properties is the notion of _consistency_. The probability model defined by a probabilistic grammar is said to be _consistent_ if the probabilities assigned to all the strings in the language sum to one. From the literature on probabilistic context-free grammars (CFGs), we know precisely the conditions which ensure that consistency is true for a given CFG. This paper derives the conditions under which a given probabilistic Tree Adjoining Grammar (TAG) can be shown to be consistent. It gives a simple algorithm for checking consistency and gives the formal justification for its correctness. The conditions derived here can be used to ensure that probability models that use TAGs can be checked for _deficiency_ (i.e. whether any probability mass is assigned to strings that cannot be generated).
1998-09-18T03:58:57
1998-09-18T03:58:57
[ -0.003627777, -0.0067710876, -0.04953003, -0.11975098, -0.0016679764, 0.037109375, -0.11602783, 0.044403076, 0.0022239685, 0.011024475, -0.008033752, -0.0027770996, 0.0063552856, -0.030929565, 0.0048599243, -0.028884888, -0.023544312, 0.021499634, -0.08203125, -0.051971436, 0...
[ 0.0013551712, -0.013763428, -0.04095459, -0.0960083, 0.0059814453, 0.027954102, -0.109375, 0.024520874, -0.0010595322, 0.019515991, -0.0041046143, -0.0009813309, 0.020568848, -0.021148682, 0.005973816, -0.0135269165, -0.03265381, 0.05029297, -0.033966064, -0.05291748, 0.01649...
http://arxiv.org/abs/cs/9809028v1
http://arxiv.org/pdf/cs/9809028v1
Separating Dependency from Constituency in a Tree Rewriting System
Anoop Sarkar
cs.CL
cs.CL, I.2.7; D.3.1
In this paper we present a new tree-rewriting formalism called Link-Sharing Tree Adjoining Grammar (LSTAG) which is a variant of synchronous TAGs. Using LSTAG we define an approach towards coordination where linguistic dependency is distinguished from the notion of constituency. Such an approach towards coordination that explicitly distinguishes dependencies from constituency gives a better formal understanding of its representation when compared to previous approaches that use tree-rewriting systems which conflate the two issues.
1998-09-18T04:44:02
1998-09-18T04:44:02
[ 0.0022010803, -0.03427124, -0.03253174, -0.13903809, -0.032714844, 0.06378174, -0.09875488, 0.059448242, -0.019546509, 0.012886047, -0.018112183, 0.01725769, -0.047698975, -0.010803223, -0.006969452, -0.043914795, 0.0027999878, -0.0069770813, -0.024642944, -0.029815674, 0.021...
[ 0.02255249, -0.04144287, -0.01637268, -0.11248779, -0.008003235, 0.044647217, -0.09387207, 0.03387451, -0.007194519, 0.023071289, -0.0045394897, 0.011802673, 0.0008234978, -0.010818481, -0.0020370483, -0.044647217, -0.00182724, 0.022064209, -0.0068740845, -0.03643799, 0.01141...
http://arxiv.org/abs/cs/9809029v1
http://arxiv.org/pdf/cs/9809029v1
Incremental Parser Generation for Tree Adjoining Grammars
Anoop Sarkar
cs.CL
cs.CL, I.2.7; D.3.1
This paper describes the incremental generation of parse tables for the LR-type parsing of Tree Adjoining Languages (TALs). The algorithm presented handles modifications to the input grammar by updating the parser generated so far. In this paper, a lazy generation of LR-type parsers for TALs is defined in which parse tables are created by need while parsing. We then describe an incremental parser generator for TALs which responds to modification of the input grammar by updating parse tables built so far.
1998-09-18T05:03:48
1998-09-18T05:03:48
[ -0.007484436, -0.034240723, -0.050445557, -0.124938965, -0.019500732, 0.04574585, -0.14685059, 0.039245605, -0.0031013489, 0.019088745, -0.050720215, 0.020553589, -0.01953125, -0.0066871643, -0.006198883, -0.034820557, -0.0154418945, 0.035980225, -0.056640625, -0.03164673, 0....
[ 0.011016846, -0.046295166, -0.036132812, -0.10998535, -0.003194809, 0.036254883, -0.10992432, 0.038269043, -0.021392822, 0.03338623, -0.028625488, 0.012107849, -0.01914978, 0.010864258, -0.019424438, -0.05331421, -0.0107040405, 0.023971558, -0.022827148, -0.025863647, 0.00356...
http://arxiv.org/abs/cs/9809050v1
http://arxiv.org/pdf/cs/9809050v1
"A Freely Available Morphological Analyzer, Disambiguator and Context Sensitive Lemmatizer for Germ(...TRUNCATED)
Wolfgang Lezius, Reinhard Rapp, Manfred Wettler
cs.CL
cs.CL, H.3.4
"In this paper we present Morphy, an integrated tool for German morphology,\npart-of-speech tagging (...TRUNCATED)
1998-09-23T12:59:39
1998-09-23T12:59:39
[0.00093603134,-0.018585205,-0.017059326,-0.053131104,-0.025756836,0.031097412,-0.07885742,0.0076179(...TRUNCATED)
[0.01864624,-0.022445679,-0.015205383,-0.03640747,-0.009666443,0.011123657,-0.08203125,-0.0103302,-0(...TRUNCATED)
http://arxiv.org/abs/cs/9809106v1
http://arxiv.org/pdf/cs/9809106v1
Processing Unknown Words in HPSG
Petra Barg, Markus Walther
cs.CL
cs.CL, I.2.7
"The lexical acquisition system presented in this paper incrementally updates\nlinguistic properties(...TRUNCATED)
1998-09-25T11:02:08
1998-09-25T11:02:08
[-0.043304443,-0.026412964,-0.0287323,0.017822266,-0.03756714,0.004890442,-0.008018494,0.0035209656,(...TRUNCATED)
[-0.026947021,-0.029129028,-0.024093628,-0.028762817,-0.035980225,0.022583008,-0.071899414,0.0052337(...TRUNCATED)
http://arxiv.org/abs/cs/9809107v1
http://arxiv.org/pdf/cs/9809107v1
Computing Declarative Prosodic Morphology
Markus Walther
cs.CL
cs.CL, I.2.7
"This paper describes a computational, declarative approach to prosodic\nmorphology that uses inviol(...TRUNCATED)
1998-09-25T14:32:38
1998-09-25T14:32:38
[0.01928711,-0.005432129,0.007965088,-0.1126709,-0.02960205,0.045898438,-0.11871338,0.019805908,0.02(...TRUNCATED)
[0.0049591064,-0.010192871,0.005458832,-0.08728027,-0.025390625,0.052337646,-0.11401367,0.0041122437(...TRUNCATED)
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio

This dataset comprises a collection of the most recent (up to 23 November 2023) 10K arXiv papers' metadata in cs.CL (Computation and Language). Each metadata entry has been enriched with the 'title' and 'abstract' embeddings, generated using Cohere's Embed-v3 for 'clustering'.

Downloads last month
11